Rangers Rumours


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

Most of the posts go to the Rangers Banter page

Also more posts are being added to the Rangers Other Posts page

03 Dec 2016 14:36:59
Have heard from a very reliable source that the squad is really fed up with training methods, same old same old everyday. I was one of Warburtons biggest fans but starting to doubt him so King and co, fans, players etc time has come to either back the man or let him go.

Believable0 Unbelievable13

02 Dec 2016 06:36:33
Rangers are weighing up a January loan move for Porto's Portuguese playmaker Joao Teixeira. source The Daily Pail. Ex Liverpool and Brentford 23yr old.

Believable9 Unbelievable7

02 Dec 2016 08:17:26
So this the so called big name we are after?

{Ed001's Note - he is a quality player, he just missed a few seasons with a bad back problem which held him back and meant he missed his chance with Liverpool. On the ball he is class though.}

Agree7 Disagree1

02 Dec 2016 17:59:44
So is kranjckar and whereas he!

Agree1 Disagree6

02 Dec 2016 18:28:39
@geomac - Eh? He's injured for the rest of the season.

Agree1 Disagree1

02 Dec 2016 19:09:24
Another McParland boy who didn't quite fulfill his original potential. The world of football is full of them, and so is Ibrox. I know scouts who have made careers out of tracking these players from a young age, waiting until their frailties emerge (injury prone, chicken hearted, a wee substance or drink problem, lack of energy, poor learner, bigheaded, the list goes on) and get them released from the big clubs then the scouts move in and place them with lesser clubs. For about half a season or more they look the part the lower level before their drawbacks resurface. Even in Scotland clubs had (have) scouts who operated like this with the not-quite-top-drawer legions of players.

Agree5 Disagree0

03 Dec 2016 03:07:00

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Dec 2016 12:34:44
Nobody said we were looking at any big names. Of course we aren't going to get anyone top drawer. A top drawer player would be worth more than our club.

Agree1 Disagree1

03 Dec 2016 14:10:46
The attacking midfielder warbs is trying to sign on loan is jota who's currently on loan at eibar in spain from brentford.

Agree3 Disagree1

30 Nov 2016 23:45:09
Aberdeen game will be Warburtons last. If he doesn't win that then he will be gone.

Believable22 Unbelievable21

01 Dec 2016 04:43:20
Im sorry to say this but that's the worst iv ever seen rangers play they are not performing under Warburton its obvious to see he keeps saying the teams still learning the mans not got a clue i think he's the one that's still learning most of his signings have been poor wee need somebody in pretty quick to turn things around before we lose second place.

Agree16 Disagree3

01 Dec 2016 04:54:50
im sorry but i wouldn't give him that long the teams not performing under him its obvious to see and most of his signings are a joke he keeps saying the team will learn from this well it looks to me like he's the one still learning time for change before its to late we need second place and who ever comes in will need to start from scratch they're only about four or five players worth keeping in that team.

Agree12 Disagree1

01 Dec 2016 07:13:38
Current rangers team reminds me of the team pre souness no leadership, drive or commitment.

we are rubbish pains me to say. We have some players the just not up to.
Wasted a few million non wages etc.

Mid-table will be our level come the end of the season .

Agree12 Disagree5

01 Dec 2016 07:46:13
billy1690 after watching that game, i don't even know if i would keep 4 or 5 from the squad and there's not a chance we'll finish 2nd, at this rate, we'll be lucky to finish 5th and we certainly won't be in Europe next season, which is a blessing btw. I used to go to Ibrox in the early 80's when we had a terrible team and were getting crowds of 16,000 or so but at least that team had some fight, King and co better watch out or they might see the crowds starting to dwindle.

Agree14 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 10:23:36
the players are making warbs look worse than he actually is there must be something going on that the players don't like as they aren't showing up for the manager.

its a joke professional footballers that can pass a ball.

the players are to blame .

although I do think warbs hasn't got a clue. he gets us to play out from the back and all the defenders do is pass it to each other and back to wes.

they can't pass or handle pressure on the ball so that is wrong from the manager to ask us to do that.

we are very light in the middle of the park and can't handle any tackles.
we should be trying different formations like a 5-3-2

almost everyone including myself said dodo should start but what a flop he is over hit every pass took his dissaloud goal well but that was it from him.

the whole team from back to front where dire.
souness would have kicked seven shades of sh*te out every one of them at half time.

Agree7 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 12:09:06
The points per game we have got so far would be enough for 2nd the last 3 seasons.

Agree6 Disagree6

01 Dec 2016 12:20:33
warbs must ASAP along with weir who clearly does nothing or doesn't have any input, we nd a new man in place and give him january transfer window then rest of season to see who he keeps and who releases warbs stubborness is his downfall clearly can't take criticism players aren't blameless holt and halliday are powderpuff i'm sick of the local boy done good approach most fans have to halliday he's rotten no strikers have any confidence because they aren't givin a decent run i'm sick of warbs excuses for me he has to go NOW.

Agree7 Disagree1

01 Dec 2016 12:31:04
That last night was atrocious to watch, Rangers actually made an ordinary Hearts team look good, Tav has cost us three goals in the last two games, how can he possibly start on Saturday against that flying machine Hayes. I looked forward to seeing big Crooks in action but another weird manager decision, play the big guy as attacking midfield player rather than in a central role just crazy to me. I hate to say this but now is the time for a change of manager, Warbs is showing week after week that he has no idea how to change the play or can see where certain players are not up to our level and should be dropped, only problem is who to bring in as manager.

Agree4 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 12:47:09
James sterling been sayin ths all season bout warburton he's clueless ryt now has to dith 433 or he will be goner beforr xmas, on the other hand who would be good manager for us i would go for tony pulis or alan pardew we need a boss who will stick the boot into those highly paid players.

Agree2 Disagree3

01 Dec 2016 12:53:39
Tony pulis, Alan pardew. Aye nae bother Barry Middleton.

Agree6 Disagree1

01 Dec 2016 13:11:08
Agree 100% with you colshygers about Halliday, boy is a mid table premiership team standard player, his terrible passing puts us in bother every single game he needs to be benched pronto. There is a severe lack of creativity in the team, and don't even get me started on the defending! How a proper centre back wasn't his main transfer target in the summer is beyond me. I don't think warburton will last beyond xmas, how you can stick to the same formation in a match where it clearly isn't working shows that he won't go much further than us in management! Starting to get worried about 10 in a row now.

Agree3 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 13:41:04
Rick witter did celtic not get rodgers yes n rangers are bigger thn palace and west brom if your hsppy we the dross we have thn good luck but bein ambitous is what we need to do or do we go for alex neil then instead but we more or less are mansged by acedemy coach not cut out for this level so i would definitely go for better manager any day.

Agree1 Disagree4

01 Dec 2016 15:26:22
With regard to Halliday, Who would you put in there instead of him?
I would give not one player a 5/ 10 last night, and I have calmed down a bit after watching it!

We need to change this system and style as it is making our players look even worse than they are.

Agree3 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 16:08:53
Maybe crooks and holt in the middle? Why not try a good old fashioned 4-4-2 with dodoo or waghorn running off garner? Warburton and co only have themselves to blame after poor recruitment over the summer, all have been injury prone bar hill and gilks and the less said about Barton the better.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 17:27:08
i would try 352 on saturday flood the midfield to try and get a grip of the game we know we can't defend so we might aswell attack use tav for what he's good at attackin miller garner up top aberdeen will only play 1 up because after last nights result a draw on saturday will suit then but we all know it won't happen because warbs stubborness and ego is getting in the way now it will be piss poor 433 with midfield 3 bullied again and not one player brave on the ball.

Agree5 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 17:40:06
First time post just joined site as been dying to vent for a while this season. For me Warburtons Stubborness is his biggest weakness surely refusing to alter a system when its not working is a major flaw? And how can Davie Weir who was a class defender for the gers be part of a mangement team that fails to work on anything defensive on the training pitch particularly set pieces?

Agree2 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 18:39:09
Huey, what was that post all about.? It's the season n it's not good enough doesn't matter what points total snybody got last year!

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 20:40:01
Watching that rubbish the other night took felt like watching the dross we had under McCoist. I don't think warns will lose his job if we lose to the sheep on Saturday but as a true blue I really don't see any progress under the current regime.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 21:49:49
Last night was abysmal. as has been the constant possession without having shots on goal or converting possession into goals as per the last few games/ weeks/ months. wi warbs n weir getting contract extension and us having just paid off barton i just don't c us paying up their contracts. We need a million to see us thru to end of season. this 433 ain't working. we see it he must see it. so if we r stuck wi him which is likely for the forseeable then he must change the tactics.2 massive games and 6 points a MUST.

Agree2 Disagree0

02 Dec 2016 00:56:28
Wastin your time bears he ain't going to drop his fav pet big rob keirnan n he ain't going to ditch his formation simple as tht bite our tounges n accept it untill he's gone wich hopefully is soon told yas months ago he wasnt ryt for rangers and our fans sayin we wur makin progress under him far from it.

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Dec 2016 03:12:21
No chance of 6 points from those 2 games. Said on here last week wed be lucky to get 4 points from these 3 games well be lucky to get that going by wed performance.

Agree2 Disagree1

02 Dec 2016 13:43:39
Utter nonsense, and some unbelievably short memories on here if you think that's the worst team you've seen. Warburton is going nowhere for the time being.

Agree3 Disagree4

02 Dec 2016 19:13:06
I've got a long memory, Souness, going back to 1958 when I first saw Rangers, and this is mighty close to being the worst team I've ever seen representing our club in the top league. It really is that bad.

Agree3 Disagree0

02 Dec 2016 07:36:30
Bring back Sir Walter!

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Dec 2016 15:17:38
What about big sam allardyce or chris coleman? What do you think barrymiddleton?

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Dec 2016 14:30:29
Aye it's maybe not great but no way is it as bad as under the McCoist/ McDowall era. The 4-0 pumping at Easter Road was much much worse than the game the other night as Hearts are much better than that Hobs side.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Nov 2016 12:31:48
other than tabloids has there been any real intrest from red bull.
or is there just sum wee guy starting a rumour to make us think we have a way to get fixed quickly.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

30 Nov 2016 12:51:19
People are putting two and two together.

You don't just arrange a random winter friendly against a team from Germany without there being more to it.

If they're just wanting to get a 90 minutes, keep up to speed friendly, why not just arrange a friendly against someone little closer to home.

RB Leipzig is a little to specific for people not to speculate.

Agree5 Disagree3

30 Nov 2016 13:04:03
I don't even think the tabloids have mentioned it either james.

Agree3 Disagree0

30 nov 2016 13:53:02
im sure i read it in the daily record or the sun. seen it on here loads of times. but i'm sure it was in the record.

Agree0 Disagree3

30 Nov 2016 18:08:26
Our Club is hated by pretty much everyone as we all know and same goes for RB leipzig, miby that could be something to do with it lol.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Nov 2016 18:18:02
I. don't read they papers mate so you may well have . I've seen it on here plenty aswell but just can't see it happnin for many reasons but don't get me wrong that doesn't mean I wouldn't want there investment, someones investment, anybodys investment haha.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Nov 2016 18:31:09
@What a team, "everybody hates u" is maybe correct but there are reasons just look back in your short history.
U hate Celtic, Hibs, Aberdeen, Dundee Utd, Motherwell, Hearts the list goes on.
I as a Celtic supporter only hate Rangers, go figure maybe u bring it on yourselves.
But then again its never YOUR fault.

Agree2 Disagree9

30 Nov 2016 19:31:10

What age are you? 'As a Celtic supporter I only hate Rangers' you're pathetic.

Agree11 Disagree0

30 Nov 2016 20:40:26
If we have a short history why would you hate such a new team?

Agree4 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 07:54:32
My name is Rayman 99. My favourite team is Celtic. I like the colour green I have a pet dog called Larson. My mummy said I will be big and strong when I grow up. My mummy says that I am her little soldier. We all hate Rangers.

Agree7 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 01:29:34
Can someone please tell me if its true that Red Bull cannot have more than one team playing in the same European Competition?

{Ed001's Note - it is correct. Though UEFA will no doubt look the other way if another money is handed out.}

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 21:48:25
😂😂😂😂 spot on Marathon Bear. Great post.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Dec 2016 19:05:39
hi rayman you missed out lincoln red imps, did you take your punishment in 1994, oops fergus the saviour, i heard your pal wiss couldn't come on here tonight he is still trying to get into his new gers top for tonights game, i thought he, d slide into a xxxxl size easily just shows you what too many blue nose burgers can do lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 21:15:53
Guy on my social media posted a selfie of him and waghorn after he delivered a parcel to the new house he's bought and going to be living in so doubt he'll be going anywhere in january hopefully he can kick on rest of season but unless MW changes his system waghorn just doesn't fit in unless he plays him through the middle but can't see him getting game time there either.

Believable0 Unbelievable7

28 Nov 2016 23:21:11
A good source has told me that rangers will be making every effort to sign bristol rovers striker matt taylor and notts forest goalscoring midfielder henri lansbury in january. He said the fee for taylor is close to £1 million, but said the fee for lansbury was still to be negotiated! Only passing on and sharing what i've been told fellow bears!

Believable16 Unbelievable15

29 Nov 2016 00:38:26
Dont know a lot about matty taylor but goad goal ratio albeit at lower level, lasbury signing if true would b a cracker, reckon he would b a proper player for us and a leader in the side! Not sure his contarct situatin but would imagine it will be pre contract as I would reckon forest would want a couple of million.

Agree6 Disagree1

29 Nov 2016 08:44:15
I think Lansbury would be a good signing. Agree it's probably a pre-contract. Don't think it would then be much more to get him in Jan.

Agree4 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 11:26:43
Lansbury would be a magnificent signing. With him out of contract next year a pre contract would be the most viable option. His wages would be the stumbling block.

If we brought a striker in I'd imagine that would mean someone is going out, Waghorn hasn't featured much this year.

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Nov 2016 12:27:42
I think the first area is a cb that we need sum1 with pace .

then a striker.
in the middle of the park we have good quality so not too fussed if we strengthen there.

I don't think we will add too many new players think 2 tops but one of them must be a cb.

Agree1 Disagree2

29 Nov 2016 13:29:00
I actually think the middle of the park we are lacking imagination, yeah we have good players but no one who can find that little pocket of space needed to create an opportunity out of nothing.

Playing this formation requires us to have at least one intelligent midfielder who can read the game going forward rather than defensively.

I would take a cb cm and cf.

I don't think waggy is lethal enough to be considered our main goal threat and wouldn't mind if he was sold and replaced in January.

Agree3 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 14:20:09
I think biggest concern is middle of park and other than rossiter we lack quality in that area. Games are won and lost in that area we have no creative players no real ball winner for me I would b happy with a ball winner who I thought crooks might be but still yet to see him and a creative player (nikos place)

Agree4 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 19:52:18
Lansbury would be a great signing. Hattrick at the weekend captain of the Notts forrest side. Guy can certainly play. Taylors goal ratio is decent wouldn't hurt as we're crying out for a 20 goal a season striker.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Nov 2016 05:00:04
Lansbury in midfield, a commanding centre back, ideally another leader and a quality striker, (although I do believe that Dodoo can do a job for us) .

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Nov 2016 09:30:41
Lansbury would be a fantastic signing, but if we only get two in I'd rather see a CB and a striker. Might be slightly controversial at the moment with his current form but I think McKay will become a fantastic no. 10 for us and should be given a free role in the centre of the park.

Agree2 Disagree2

30 Nov 2016 09:30:41
Lansbury would be a fantastic signing, but if we only get two in I'd rather see a CB and a striker. Might be slightly controversial at the moment with his current form but I think McKay will become a fantastic no. 10 for us and should be given a free role in the centre of the park.

Agree1 Disagree1

30 Nov 2016 13:56:56
McKay has the build the first touch and the skill level required in that no 10 role . all he needs is the brain for it which I think he has the now but he is still young with a lot to learn.

Agree1 Disagree1

26 Nov 2016 15:46:57
Stv stating that Red Bull are looking to take over Rangers. Would most likely mean the club would be know as "Red Bull Rangers" but with still seemingly financial uncertainty at the club I think if they did make an offer it would be in our best interests to accept it.

Believable16 Unbelievable12

26 Nov 2016 16:06:08
Club will be known as Rangers.

Agree10 Disagree11

26 Nov 2016 16:54:25
never happen lads, there's no profit in scottish football for a company that size to invest.

Agree8 Disagree5

26 Nov 2016 17:46:45
Kinda agree bhoywonder but Austria isn't the most commercially viable of leagues.

Agree8 Disagree3

26 Nov 2016 19:03:02
There is money to be made if you are Red Bull and you can get the team into Europe but even with Rangers' Worldwide appeal I don't see it happening!

Agree4 Disagree0

27 Nov 2016 12:23:17
I believe it could happen, maybe not this year but the closer celtic get to 10 in a row then the desperation could kick in. I know from the past that the thought of rangers doing 10 in a row was the worst time of my football days and I'm sure most honest rangers fans shall say the same about celtic doing 10 in a row.

Agree4 Disagree2

27 Nov 2016 13:24:43
10 in a row wouldn't be the same as winning ten with both teams in the league. Basically the last 5 mean sweet fa. Red Bull aren't looking to make money in football it's all about promoting the brand. RB Leipzig doesn't stand for Red Bull Leipzig either so the whole"Red Bull Rangers" thing can be put to bed right now.

Agree5 Disagree2

27 Nov 2016 14:07:19
I can't get my head round why selik are so desperate for 10 in a row when the record there trying to break is only there own since Rangers don't "exsist" anymore🤔.

Agree8 Disagree1

27 Nov 2016 23:23:23
Jmaster- the only reaso the club isn't called Red Bull Leipzig is the ban on commercial names of clubs in Germany. So the RB stands for something long an she German but is very much insinuated as Red Bull. Without similar regulations in Scotland, if they did invest it would be highly likely they'd expect the Red Bull name to be used. Off the top of my head I am sure that's the deal they have with Salzburg? Sorry if that's wrong, but 90% sure!

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Nov 2016 10:02:29
j master, that's like trying to say Andy Murray being world number 1 means nothing because Nadal and Federer were out for 6 month. or Jordan speith masters don't count because tiger woods was not playing.

Agree2 Disagree2

28 Nov 2016 10:03:34
i couldn't care any less if they wanted to call us red bull rangers.
we are rangers and it doesn't matter what comes before it or after it and most would be okay with this in the long run when we get the financial backing of a giant company like them.
to them 30 million is peanuts but would make our team a lot better.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Nov 2016 12:05:18
This is a weird one. The money would be amazing. but they'd rip the team that we know apart. Yeah sure we'd see ourselves as Rangers, but no one else would. Also, we'd no longer play in blue and white. kits would completely change. the club itself would change.

Agree2 Disagree4

28 Nov 2016 13:35:33
this is all pointless anyways as red bull can't buy rangers the resolution 11 didn't pass so there are no new shares to buy.

and comparing golf to the spl is just stupidity but what else do u expect from a celtic fan.

you all know fine well its not the same as the two nine in a rows of years gone past get this ten and pretend it means as much all you want but we know that you all know its not the same and these titles are tainted . they are titles non the less so go on convince yourselves that they mean as much as they do when we are in the league.

although saying that you guys hardly had fans at the games during those years did you and everyone came rushing back when the mighty rangers where coming back up. goes to show its all about the rangers.

Agree3 Disagree3

28 Nov 2016 16:52:32
The pain is really oozing out of some you lot. If Celtic win 10 in a row it will be deserved, the only tainted titles you lot should be worrying about are the Ones your old club won during the Ebt years. When the Supreme Court rules against the appeal they will be stripped And rightly so.

Agree2 Disagree3

28 Nov 2016 22:00:53
Rangers1993,you posted that STV stated that red bull were looking to take over rangers! Where did you see that mate? Can't see STV stating that anywhere my friend!

Agree0 Disagree2

28 Nov 2016 22:40:33

Red Bull recognise the size of Rangers and recognise that Rangers are on the way up and want to capitalise on Rangers rise.

To suggest there's no market or interest in Scottish football or Rangers is foolish.

1) Scottish football is covered nationwide by all big channels.

2) the old firm is viewed worldwide.

3) as Rangers grow and likewise Red Bull we'd be part of a collective group if clubs where by relationships will be built and we'll have friendlies in areas were the club and sponsors can grow the brand and name.


I'm in favour of stadium name change and that of the stadium facility and Inc the logo on strips.

£12M-£20M per year for ten years would make Rangers a force again and tell my why RB couldn't benefit from that.

Stop with the negativity people.

Agree0 Disagree1

28 Nov 2016 22:57:32
Red Bull is huge company. and we are a sleeping giant with huge potential and a massive fanbase. its not about Red Bull investing to make money. its about being associated with a succesful club and the fantastic publicity and advertising that goes with it. i'd welcome it as King doesn't seem to have any investors lining up. Just more watered down share issues which again the fans will pay for.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 10:19:31
I agree Forza, there's a huge marketing opportunity for Red Bull when Rangers are involved. It would make sense to a company like Red Bull to want to be involved with us.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 13:28:56
Keep telling yourself the titles will be stripped, ain't going to happen.

Agree2 Disagree0

29 Nov 2016 13:11:05
Just to make you aware lads this rumour was actually started on a celtic forum as a bit of a bam up lol. Red bull invested in Salzburg because that is where the RB headquarters is. This is a business with zero personal attachmenf to The Rangers, why would they pump in 20 million a year, plus all the initial outlay of millions to get the club up to scratch, for basically zero return of investment? Lol. Dreaming.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Nov 2016 23:34:34
Heard from a mate that serge atakayi has been promised some first team action in the next 5-10 games hopefully this is true as looks like one of our biggest and promising talents.

Believable6 Unbelievable14

24 Nov 2016 19:56:46
Anybody think we should bring back mo edu and bring in ben arfa?

Agree5 Disagree18

24 Nov 2016 21:15:23
Ben arfa plays for PSG no chance.

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Nov 2016 21:24:09
Don't think the manager would promise any kid game time but I have been told that they are quite excited about this boy.

Agree4 Disagree2

25 Nov 2016 10:55:18
Before these boys play 1st team football they need to train with the 1st team squad which as far as i'm aware is not the case at present so can't see any breakthroughs soon unfortunately.

Agree4 Disagree1

26 Nov 2016 08:00:11
Edu was mince first time around so why on earth bring him back now.

Agree12 Disagree5

23 Nov 2016 09:02:13
Seeing as this is a rumour site I thought I would share a rumour with you all! I have heard that the Main Stand is riddled with asbestos and they cannot access/ maintain the heating pipes without removing the asbestos first. This could cost millions, but unless done, parts of the Main Stand could be closed in 2017 as the safety certificates will not be signed off. This is from a pal of mine who works with asbestos. Hope it's just a rumour, but thought I would share.

Believable5 Unbelievable29

23 Nov 2016 11:01:12
Sure this was a favourite rumour on the other mobs site. AGM coming up, maybe someone will ask the question.

Agree5 Disagree1

23 Nov 2016 12:03:06
It's a known fact Ibrox has Asbestos in it, which their is nothing wrong with. However if it was an issue that things couldn't have maintenance done due to the asbestos it would have been highlighted at some point in the last 16 years.

Agree9 Disagree0

23 Nov 2016 12:28:55
Bigad how have they been accessing/ maintaining the pipes up until now this is another filed under bs.

Agree5 Disagree3

23 Nov 2016 13:32:44
In response to Bigar, I have also heard a similar story regarding the roofs at ibrox. I have also heard that Glasgow City Council have been out to carry out an inspection, what the outcome was I don't know. So there may be some truth in this.

Agree3 Disagree6

23 Nov 2016 15:24:38
Asbestos is not an issue. We've just had it removed from our Church. Two options . if you can afford to, remove it completely. If not, use tradesmen who are trained and qualified to work in an area where there is asbestos. (i. e. with breathing masks, etc) .

Just another rumour from the dark side who are gutted that we haven't gone away!

Agree9 Disagree1

23 Nov 2016 22:37:05
Guys I have worked with asbestos and it can stay in place and be coated with a special rubber paint
Its only dangerous when its broken and gives off dust particles.
We boxed in an old asbestos garage roof last summer without any problems as we did not disturb the sheets.

Agree4 Disagree1

23 Nov 2016 22:56:27
I can assure you its not that simple Stuart.

Agree1 Disagree4

24 Nov 2016 09:58:19
Asbestos is only an issue if broken, I work with removal and management of asbestos daily. U will find asbestos in any plant room or pipework lagging of a building that age so totally not a problem, as long as it can be managed safely there is no need for removal.

As for the roof! That's not asbestos and y would Glasgow city council be checking it out? It's not a council building.

Crock of scaremongering nonsense.

Agree8 Disagree1

24 Nov 2016 10:05:01
I don't know anything about asbestos, just passing on what I've been told. thebear82, I hope it is bs.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Nov 2016 10:55:00
Very much is BS, Asbestos is far more common than you think. it's also a lot more containable than people think. This is a bs story no doubt started by the darkside.

Agree2 Disagree1

26 Nov 2016 09:36:43
Asbestos is only harmaful once disturbed. easy option is put in new pipes and use alternative route. easy peasy people. cost peanuts.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Nov 2016 22:46:34
Many, perhaps all, insurance companies will pay a chunk of asbestos removal as it is the cheaper of all of the options eg allowing it to downgrade to a dangerous state or the cost allowing so white van chancer to say they can do it, so I think the cost is manageable unless we has stinted on the insurance premiums!

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Nov 2016 02:59:40
Been told by a board member that there WONT b any money spent in Jan! Gutted as I was really hoping we could strengthen! Thoughts bears?

Believable4 Unbelievable10

23 Nov 2016 06:36:38
After much thought the last few months, I am pleasantly surprised. We do not have the money why spend it and end up in division 4? Focus on investing in youth build upwards, the only time we should begin to spend money is if 10 in a row is too close for call. King will not spend upwards of 2 Million on a player anyway, we will get a few loans, come second and see what happens next years. We welcome the chase!

Agree6 Disagree3

23 Nov 2016 08:37:46
Bringing our own players through is definitely the way forward. Unfortunately, most supporters want instant success. Any money spent on players has to be with a view to selling them on for good profit. Sometimes you have to spend £2m on a player in the belief he will be worth 3 or 4 times that a couple of seasons later. We did this a few times with the likes of Boumsong and Cuellar. Celtic have managed to achieve this lately. These players use our clubs as a stepping stone to move to a big club.

Agree4 Disagree3

23 Nov 2016 11:39:16
Lol good to see board members sharing imformation like that. Who ever the "board member" is he's a header.

Agree4 Disagree3

23 Nov 2016 17:18:29
What are the chances someone says no money will be spent, the same day we're linked with a move for Matty Taylor.

There will be money spent in January whether fans think it should be or not.

Money was spent to secure the Championship last January. Money will be spent to secure 2nd place and Europe this season, guaranteed.

Agree5 Disagree3

24 Nov 2016 14:03:16
Haha told by a board member classic.

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Nov 2016 00:00:14
Why on earth would anyone admit that we had money to spend and alert teams where we might have an interest in one of their players. Notwithstanding this I would rather we spent January finding some better quality players that we can sign on pre contracts.

If the current lot can't finish second then they really shouldn't be at Ibrox!

Agree2 Disagree0

Mobile version of this site: Rangers Rumours Mobile

Football Transfer Rumours

Rangers Rumours 2

Rangers Rumours 3

Rangers Rumours Archives

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass