03 May 2013 09:44:30
Inside info from a partner in a big Glasgow legal firm - there is going to be "revelations " about ownerships of Rangers property. They can`t say more at the moment as they are under " close scrutiny "


1.) 03 May 2013
Don't tell my pal or brother in law is a senior partner wait till we hear from the QC involved in the enquiry before we start rumours


2.) 03 May 2013
Are you being ironic here? Have a look at the name of the web site. There is a clue as to what it`s all about!


3.) 03 May 2013
I wonder what these revelations will reveal, so exciting. not really. What more can come out that has not previously been rumoured.


4.) 03 May 2013
CW owns the club not the holding company. CG lied. Get the seat belts back on guys.


5.) 03 May 2013
This sounds as if it could be a FACT.


6.) 03 May 2013
I heard that dermott desmond owns ibrox and murray park, think he will flatten them for building real estate, comes from a very good source


7.) 03 May 2013
I'm hearing £5.5m never changed hands.
SDM has his name on deeds and never gave them away for a quid. All he gave away was the debt and Pinset and Mason uncovered stuff about D&Ps role.


8.) 04 May 2013
04 May 2013 04:29:29
Look what good does any of your bulls**t rumours do? What do any of you know for certain? Answer - nout! Now pack it in, its a joke! James


9.) 04 May 2013
I think the revelations which will emerge around SDM will have more to do with his foreknowledge of Craig Whyte's intentions.
SDM wanted rid and so holding on to the assets would not have fitted in with that strategy.
He would have known that the only people interested in buying Rangers would have been people of Whyte's ilk.
I think he, allegedly, may even have recruited him for the purpose and provided him with ideas/contacts as to how he could proceed (e. g. Ticketus)


10.) 04 May 2013
The bottom line is did CW pay 5.5 million for the assets, if he did not then he cannot own them. If CW was promised a share of the company that bought the assets then he is entitled to a share of the company's value.

All this nonsense about title deeds is totally irrelevant, CW is looking for a lot more than just a share of the assets, he wants a share of the TRFC.

As for SDM, its not illegal to dump a toxic company and show the buyer how to buy it without using any of his own money, its called a mortgage. CW tried to use the property as security for his loan which is nonsense, its not his property until he pays the loan, and he didn't repay the loan.


11.) 07 May 2013
You know, when all is said and done, David Murray told us he would not sell the club to someone who does not have the future of the club at heart! And what does he do? He does the exact opposite! Why is nobody bringing him to account for this? He lied to the rangers support, pure and simple. Will all these " investigations " confirm this? To me, DM started the whole ball rolling by offloading the club to a venture capitalist spiv who in turn, passed is on to another venture capitalist spiv! And people wonder why we are in this mess!