24 Jul 2015 06:58:08
Sa to hand in transfer request today to seal move to rangers

1.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 07:05:33
And Hibs will reject the request.
He will not be sold to us.

2.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 08:22:43
mvg180, you can't reject the request. If he wants to leave he hands it in and hibs then realise they need to sell him.

3.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 08:29:15
If rangers go in with the right money,believe me mvg180,he will indeed be at rangers!no doubt.

4.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 08:56:52
He's finished at Hibs now and will dig his heels in for a move to Rangers. Fee will be £350,000.

5.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 10:02:30
Deffo m8 with you on that one

6.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 10:15:33
He might put in a request, but they don't have to accept it.
He is still under contract for another year, so they can hold him to that if they want.
I think they would be mad to force him to stay though, why keep a player who is unhappy?
I would love to see him come to Rangers, but don't think he will.
If he comes to us then Stubbs is going to look very stupid after the comments he has made.

Hopefully he puts in the request, Rangers bid £350,000, and it gets accepted.
Fingers crossed.

7.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 10:23:43
Hibs have played it perfectly with regards their fans. They've stated he's not for sale and they don't want to sell him to their closet rival in the league. Once he hands in a transfer request and Rangers come back in with a better offer then they blame SA for wanting the move and that it would have been disruptive to keep an unhappy player. SA is the bad guy and the Hibs save face with their fans.

8.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 10:31:21
I doubt he will play on Saturday if he hands in a transfer request regardless if he signs before then or not lol.

Thats pretty damaging to the hibees midfield. I doubt he would put in a motm performance for a team holding him back against the team he wants to play for :)

Well played by the board/M Warburton

9.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 11:43:41
I agree. There's no chance he will play tomorrow

10.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 11:49:17
Not according to SSN he hasn't and our two offers are £100k and then £250k hibs value Allen at £1.5m and won't sell to a rival

11.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 12:21:04
Where did you hear Hibs are valuing him at 1.5M Kevin?

12.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 12:28:37
£1.5m- - you must be having a bloody larf mate!
its the Scottish championship, not La Liga.
The guys in the last year of his contract when he can walk away for nothing. 3 or 400k would let Stubbs buy 4 players or more!!
I wouldn't pay over 500k for anyone in the SPL never mind this league.
Wake up - the days of adding an extra zero on when the Gers come calling are long gone.

13.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 12:45:56
Kevin are you having a laugh?

1.5m Do you know how transfers work?

I know exactly what's going to happen with regards to the ongoing transfer

Let's keep it short though

The player will possibly play his last game in Petrofac

Start of next week he will be a Rangers player as Stubbs hands will be forced once Scott Allan hands in his transfer request

The sooner this shambles is over the better, for the mentality of the player and the harmony of the Hibs dressing room

Also, the embarrassment of the initial bids going in from Rangers FC

Test the water that will be right!?

I am a Rangers fan and I'm slightly embarrassed with this now he's a quality player though and it shows with the media frenzy!

Ok he's not Gazza, why all the frenzy? I will tell you why He's Hubs best player and the low bidding has caused all the stir up!

If we are hungry enough show Hibernian the money, afterall, It goes back into a Scottish football team and is good for our sport

In his last year contract

Valuation: £200,000 - £300,000

Dave King time to show the wallet for this one
He is the "marquee" signing the fans want to see

Cough up the £300,000 for Hibs

14.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 13:41:12
Your all having a laugh SA is at hibs and staying there there's a chance he will sign a 1 year extension on Monday and Rangers would be a backward step for him as for a fee £850k

15.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 13:37:05
Its a statement from hibs on SSN and anyone on here asking "do I know how transfers work?" Is being hypocritical How many of these rumours actually materialize? Few weeks ago we were sighning drogba on a free FFS!! So if you canny read don't shoot the messenger

16.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 13:54:12
I wouldn't agree Kaz. I think Rangers are only doing what every other club does, You try and get the player for as little as you can. And remember just how 'sympathetic' this club and its fans were when we hit the skids. They, along with Celtic, Aberdeen and especially DU (cant even bring myself to mention this lot), were the most scathing. I for one have a long long memory. Yes, we hit the self destruct big style, but the sheer delight felt all over the footballing world in Scotland was difficult to stomach.

17.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 14:06:45
Kaz now I can't say that king has perhaps spent what he said he would but over the years he has personally invested over 20 million million. If you had lost that amount would you be willing to throw money around give the guy a break and stop telling him to spend. And for "time to show the wallet" he already has

18.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 14:26:38
Yes I know he has already showing the wallet hence why we have the new signings at the club

What I meant was show a bit of steel for this one as this is the one most fans want to see

I think he should go all out and get his man for £300,000

19.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 14:48:21
Well Noddy, that we know is down to the TV deal we get with Sky bottom line!

TV deals alone has messed up Scottish football

Day and night between our neighbours

The Scottish teams are scraping at the bottom of the barrel as a result, hence why there is small bids here and there

What England gets in comparisons to Scottish clubs with TV rights absolutely boils my blood!

I'd rather not go there it's a total farce!

{Ed001's Note - best you don't because you are so clueless it is embarrassing. The Premier League and greed is what messed up Scottish football, nothing to do with TV deals. Scottish football ruined its product.}

20.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 15:23:46
Yes I know that too well The Lex Gold years

Doesn't hide the fact that we should be getting a better deal than what it is current!

EPL 5b over three years / 20 teams
SPL 65m over three years / currently 12 teams

Many statistic analyst's suggest Scottish Football only get 1/8 of what we SHOULD be given

We should be getting AT LEAST double the deal of what's put in front of us

130M over a 3 year contract

SPL teams should try sanction the best they can with the Old Firm paying the difference!

Therefore it is what it is and there is nothing that can be done

21.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 15:36:18
Wiiman, the is a strong belief by some on here that King got most of his money back.
Even if he didn't, the difference with investing now is that he himself is pretty much in charge of the club and will be able to protect his investment.
Therefore, none of your partyline arguments stack up.

22.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 15:57:40
Onlyshowaround how can hibs not reject allan transfer request?

What world do you live in? Hibs can do what the hell they like

23.) 24 Jul 2015
24 Jul 2015 21:20:29
Kaz,we get what people are willing to pay for a poor product.We'll get double that amount when and if the product improves accordingly,its that simple.