29 Jan 2016 00:39:46
Rangers linked with Hamilton youngster Crawford seems a good player don't know if rangers quality what do yous think?

1.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 01:07:36
Great wee player, hope this is true.

2.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 01:52:39
Good player. As long as they take monopoly money we should be OK to bring him in.

3.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 02:07:51
Well faf just looked ths up and unfortunately don't see anythin at all we certainly have no money to pay out its gotten tht bad were getting boys who can't get game from the start for hearts so wut chance do we have off getting ali crawford Hamilton would easly want 300 to 400k mind he's under contract he's 24 would love ths to happin but doubt it!

4.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 02:07:51
Well faf just looked ths up and unfortunately don't see anythin at all we certainly have no money to pay out its gotten tht bad were getting boys who can't get game from the start for hearts so wut chance do we have off getting ali crawford Hamilton would easly want 300 to 400k mind he's under contract he's 24 would love ths to happin but doubt it!

5.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 08:16:10
Barry, holt couldn't get a game for hearts either, look how he has been for us this year, and King can get a game, he's played 20 games already for hearts this season mate.

6.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 09:18:24
Took in recent Hamilton game and Crawford gave the ball away continually, took the wrong option more than the right one. We need a player capable of meeting our needs right now not next year.

7.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 09:54:17
Forfar he has played this year but as per Robbie Neilson he is now 3rd or 4th choice at the club and is being loaned out to get him some game time. The lad himself says he's here for game time in his interview.

I wonder how much influence Tynecastle now has over Rangers team selection.

The feeder teams (us) usually have to give assurances re playing time etc in order to convince the bigger club (hearts) to send their prospects to them.

8.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 10:01:50
Forfarger, the difference between king and holt is if holt has an excellent seadon with us (which he has) he is ours to keep or sell. If king has an excellent season he will be playing against us next season. I do not see the use of making this guy a better footballer when its a given he will be playing against us. We might as well try and loan scott allan to give him game time for playing against us next season. I am one very dissolutioned bear.

9.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 10:12:48
I think the loan market is fine for this season, we will win this league, when loan players return to the parent club in the summer it gives us more squad space and more scope to attract better players due to bein in the top Scottish league, if DK still doesn't back MW in the summer to strengthen the team that's when I will start worrying and looking for the panic button, until then loan signings could be key for the short term goal of automatic promotion.

10.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 10:16:57
Realistically we don't have to spend much money this transfer window Lads.
When we get promotion that's when we will start to see our transfer targets being brought in, definitely not worried in the slightest.
** * **.

11.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 10:17:55
if he can't get a game now, how is it a given he will be playing against us next year?

12.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 10:28:03
I don't buy this developing him nonsense, surely he has developed well enough already, if he does the business for us that is all that matters, it clearly hasn't come into the manager's thinking.

13.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 13:13:15
King would have been a good acquisition if it had been a permanent transfer, the fact that it is a loan deal is embarrassing.

The problem for me is still that King either does not have the cash or is not willing to part with it and one thing is for sure, we will need to spend in the summer if we are to make an impact on the SPl. No point on us being there if we are not there to win it!

14.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 15:20:31
The only thinking involved was is he decent and is he cheap. There's no other strategies at work here.

This is a good deal. For hearts. Gets a youngster game time and helps free up money for their pursuit of soutter. That's why they have been willing here folks, they ain't doing us a favour.

For us we have got a decent young player as a short term fix. Anyone else remember MW saying if we go for short term fixes we are in trouble? F not then read today's papers- he's said it again.

15.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 16:01:10
No short term fixes and yet we've brought in Forrester on a 6month deal, King on a 6month deal and a fisherman as cover for goal.

Confusing.

16.) 30 Jan 2016
30 Jan 2016 10:25:32
Forfar, as i said if he has a good season with us and comes onto a game. He will play against us next season.