04 Aug 2016 19:30:38
@andynewportPA on twitter On PA wires: Rangers could ditch controversial Puma strip released without their consent and replace it with a new kit midway through season. club supposedly looking into an SPFL rule that clubs can change strip midway through season .

1.) 04 Aug 2016
04 Aug 2016 21:42:53
I'm sure fat Mike has something to do with them?

2.) 04 Aug 2016
04 Aug 2016 22:01:18
Bigtrfc, I posted on here several weeks ago that rangers were in advanced negotiations with under armour to replace puma as our new kit manufacturers, under armour tonight blundered and actually tweeted when asked about becoming rangers new kit makers, that the new rangers kit is coming soon and to watch this space, its now looking very likely that we'll be changing our kits and manufacturers in the middle of the season once we find out and get the go ahead from the scottish governing body to do it, it looks increasing likely that under armour have secured rangers to now make our kits.

3.) 05 Aug 2016
05 Aug 2016 00:17:04
I hope this is true. I know Tottenham have sponsorship with them. maybe warns put a word in. i know that not anything to do with him but hope it true. and we get decent profits on the kits.

4.) 05 Aug 2016
05 Aug 2016 08:08:24
They then retracted the statement and said its was a "negative". Could be a blunder.

Again though we'd breach the retail agreement, someone correctly pointed out on twitter that Chelsea done this quite some time ago and this resulted in them losing a legal battle and quite some money.

To be fair Ashley is breaching it by selling unlicenced goods, but its upto the lawyers to point this out. There has to be something in the pipeline.

5.) 05 Aug 2016
05 Aug 2016 13:06:52
I don't think the courts like Ashley or the way he conducts his business and could favour for us in a court case!
that being said we now have to be carefull as he likes to go to court the fat rat!

does anyone know if the contract stipulates that his franchise must be able to sell a certain amount or we could terminate the deal and/ or if that's the loophole in the spfl rules that state if retail transaction fall well short of what is expected then we can change our strips?

6.) 05 Aug 2016
05 Aug 2016 15:57:14
Blunder by under armour or "early" marketing to gazing
Puma launch?

7.) 05 Aug 2016
05 Aug 2016 16:13:10
Saw this too. I heard the under armour rumour a while ago never thought much of it but seeing as they have tweeted they will start selling Rangers kits soon its safe to say king will never be beaten. No Surrender!

8.) 07 Aug 2016
06 Aug 2016 13:15:20
I thought SD could nt use our logo after previous court case?