1.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 14:26:56
ive not heard anything about it but if this was true wouldn't king and co come out and tell us that this is the kit we want you to buy?
or can't they say anything like that for legal reasons.

2.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 14:52:49
James, the kit isn't out yet. I'm merely just the messenger here, however from what I've heard the story comes from the father of one of the girls. She has been told that there will be a new kit soon for the players. It would make sense as a few people have been talking about under armour recently. so this just adds fuel to the flame.

3.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 14:54:29
Are you Peepil honestly thinking the Glib one, has any chance of taking on one of the biggest sports companies in world sport and sending out team in kit that is part of a watertight contract; come on guys wake up and smell the coffee. He is pushing your new club closer to a financial breakdown with every week that passes and every move he makes. He simply has to release that £30m he promised over a year ago, buy out the Contracts with it and you are at least free from these onerous and legally binding Contracts. Only problem is he nor anyone of the Blue Room brigade have the dosh; especially when you are bleeding cash and building up a bigger wage bill, which ultimately you cannot afford.
Get real and start asking questions to the GASL and not on the forum, which has no power to force change. It's good fun however to read some of the fanciful stuff you guys and the Succulent lamb brigade come up with. Don't stop.

4.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 15:22:18
Nothing happening over at your site?
You must have a rager for us considering your big game tonight.
It's your obsession with all things Blue that gets you up in the morning.

5.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 15:26:19
Although we are not supposed to know anything about our retail contract with SD the rumour and stress rumour is that RFC don't have a contract with Puma but Rangers retail do, but as you are aware we are not allowed to talk about it. 32Red allegedly are in the same situation but I'm sure our legal team will not take us down a path that would result in heavy financial penalties for the club.

6.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 16:01:14
One from the dark side!
King is playing a clever game.
I am certain that ending the contract legally and at no cost is being pursued on the basis of wishing to end a relationship detrimental to the standing of the club given the operations of Sports Direct and in particular the findings of the Parliamentary enquiry into the way that company has operated zero hours contracts and other business practices.
Given that the current board was not party to said contract, they would be perfectly entitled to seek to end it in terms of their fiduciary duties to operate in the best interests of the company.
Would Mad Mike be prepared to risk a very public court case yet again exposing his vile business practices!
I don't think so.
In King and Warburton we trust!

7.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 16:48:28
put it this way without king and co we would be nowhere near where we are at the moment and as for the 30 million he promised to invest he didn't say I will give you 30 million in one season mate go back to your green and white s*ite.

8.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 16:56:16
Dailypaget, Might be best if you checked out Desmond's latest sojourn into money laundering, instead of obsessing about the only show in town.

9.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 18:13:11
See if any of you want to know anything/ news about Rangers go the the Celtic rumours pages because they know the lot over there. They are still trying to convince each other the new club line. 4 years and you would have thought it would be old but no. Then, I suppose I can understand their obsession. If Celtic had dominated us the way that we have dominated them through the years, I would deny their existance. They are trying to be Scotlands most sucessful club by default. Quite sad really but kind of understandable. It must be cold there in our shadow.

10.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 19:33:31
Well said Tam.

11.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 20:01:32
Mad Mike has more to worry about look like he is going to be dislodged by his shareholders and replaced as chair.

12.) 23 Aug 2016
23 Aug 2016 20:16:22
I back onlyshowaround here regarding his news on a possible kit change coming soon, I'm hearing just in the last 10 minutes that rangers and club 1872 have been agreeing on a design for a new kit which will replace the current puma kit and will be manufacturerd in house short term as we are rumoured to be completely severing our ties with puma, new home made design should be on sale well before christmas, only passing on what I'm hearing fellow bears.