11 Sep 2015 09:48:51
Sure some of you will remember the goals, the cheeky chappy and some of you will remember his dire management, personally that would make it a 1-1 draw at the moment but if any of you choose to rewrite history and gloss over this side to McCoist then you are doing your club a huge disservice.

October 21 2011 on Craig Whyte. "It's great, it's smashing, me and Craig have a great working relationship."

December 21 2012 on Charles Green. "Charles is forthright and opinionated. I'd rather have him that way. The difference between Charles and the man who was in charge before him is like night and day."

March 8 2013 The day after Green said it was the worst Rangers team ever. "He was 100% right in what he was saying. He was just trying to give everybody a realistic idea of where we are at the moment and he was spot on."

A month later Green talked of his little P*** friend and Ally said this on Apri 7 2013. "I'm not sure how many titles Charles has won in his career but I've been very fortunate to win 14 at our football club." It took him 30 days to finally back his squad and only after Green's big mouth had got him in trouble.

And then this beauty came along, as staggering an indictment of his love of money and self-preservation as you will find. May 4 2013 when asked about the huge amount of cash Rangers have spent on the squad. "If I'm going to be totally selfish about it I would have to spend it to get out of the division and keep me Kenny McDowall, Ian Durrant and the rest of the staff in a job." Wow, just wow.

But it didn't stop there, he had further executives to endorse. Of Craig Mather he said on August 7 2013 "The chief executive and the manager is arguably the biggest working relationship in the club and it is safe to say and see that we are getting on absolutely fine."

Then some contradictory sound bytes followed.

November 23 2013 "It would be suicidal for me to vote against the board."

December 14 2013 "I don't know how I'm going to vote."

December 16 2013 "I'm giving my voting rights to the fans as I promised to do when I got them." But presumably forgot about two days ago eh?

So there you have it a contradictory, self preserver who only moved when the current was already in his favour and a guy who backed spiv after spiv after spiv if the price was right, be it penny shares or a whopping amount of cash to spend on his squad that would help keep him in a job, his words not mine by the way.

1.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 13:26:17
Gaz1 it never ceases to amaze me just how much time and effort you dedicate to our great club.
Sure there are guys on here who welcome your opinions less than a melanoma, I however quite enjoy your wee digs as it serves as a continual reminder that it is in fact ALL ABOUT THE RANGERS!

2.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 11:51:22
The teams playing well?

3.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 17:19:16
Much as it pains me to agree with one of the Rangers OCD patients.

Gaz 1 is 100% accurate and correct in his analysis of Judas and I would add the classic he didn't read his contract sh*te was one that really got my back up, insulting and patronising in one short comment/lie.

Also it never gets much airplay but his petulant child outing of the 3 Judges wax the most ignorant and frankly dangerous thing a person could ever do in those circumstances. Factions, thankfully very small and disappearing ones, but yes factions of our support send explosive devices to Lennon and 2 other Celtic connected media people. These people are dangerous and to publicly out these 3 Judges was for me personally a disgrace for a Rangers manager shameful

Thank god for King and Warburton Rangers in safe professional hands at long last.

4.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 19:43:57
Like I said yesterday Gazza, you were all over a Celtic thread like a rash, I don't expect clarity or sense from you, just consistency please.

I was pondering whether to mention the outing of the 3 judges KT as it never actually impacted Rangers, he also kicked up hell about Hearts not getting fined £100,000 when they went into administration only to find out that is was Rangers lawyer who actually suggested it. He had his moments in the past three years that's for sure but while there are still three monkeys imitating, unquestioning followers like Coldo I'd say his reputation shall remain intact.

5.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 21:00:15
Gaz1 like I said replying to a post containing the word Celtic doesn't mean I'm fixated with them. I know it's hard for you but do try and keep up!
Also while we are on the subject of "consistency "didn't you tell us all recently you had little time for Rangers? Evidently that ain't true as lately you're in serious danger of making Big Wull look like a bit part player on here.

6.) 11 Sep 2015
11 Sep 2015 22:08:28
I didn't see your reply, apologies. How would it be hard for me to keep up? Am I not FIXATED by this place? More contradiction Gazza, it sounded a good wee line at the time no doubt but alas it fell on it's arse.

Gazza I have been posting in here for nearly 4 years, okay. Unless you are obsessed to the extreme with me I would be surprised if you know if I am posting more, less or the same than at any time during those years. Do you know? Thought not. For what it is worth I'd say I am posting less.

I was actually wondering how this post would be received some of it would see it factually, as he uttered every word I quoted but I also knew there would be those who no matter how accurate a criticism is, how precise in its detail a point was that would instantly jump on the poster because it criticised anything to do with the mighty Rangers, facts, relevance, detail, truth, who gives one flump eh Gazza?

Green, Whyte et al loved folk like you, the never doubting plankton feeders they can dupe with any old crap but god forbid a hint of accuracy coming from a Celtic perspective. That's to be ridiculed or ignored by personal attack from moment one, good for you Gazza, you lived up to their expectations one more time.

I don't have a lot of time for Rangers but I have a lot of time for correcting history rewriting people, try and appreciate that they are not mutually exclusive. If you fail to, lie down for a while.

7.) 12 Sep 2015
12 Sep 2015 08:16:40
Gaz1 a predictable and repetitive reply as usual. You will ramble on with the same boring criticisms our club and its fans but in typical ceptic fashion you reject the same when you get some back.

It was a perfectly valid point, you are fixated so clearly the line never fell on its arse! Proof if any be needed ( and its not because people know fine exactly what you are) comes from your own admission of posting on here for four years. FOUR YEARS! ffs.

I wouldn't waste 5 minutes on your mobs site due to the undiluted bile that's on there relating to us. I believe they have a whole section dedicated to Rangers, says it all realy.

Like I say I quite enjoy your wee outbursts as it highlights the depth of ill feeling you have toward this club. But so you know gaz, so we are crystal here, the real fans on here are well aware of our failings both past and present. We know ok! We get it. So realy there's no need for a "Celtic perspective" no matter how factually correct you think you are. You then hilariously accuse others of personal attack because you're only intension is to lead us to the truth? Now be honest gaz isn't the real reason you come on, to attack, attack, and attack again ? To put up credible argument you must be able to accept your own failings and in you're case gaz there are plenty.

Also for the record, you're own bottom feeders (no doubt you were among them) tolerated many more years in the wilderness under the whites, Kelly's and the grants than we ever did blindly following celic while they were busy filling their pockets at the same time. Glass houses son, glass houses.

8.) 12 Sep 2015
12 Sep 2015 08:43:29
It's seem strange that you say you enjoy them, if so why the lengthy unimaginative 20 line moanfest about them? Make your mind up do you like them or not.

Meantime why do you never engage in what I say? Not once have you debated or disputed a point. "Factually correct you think you are" name once you've debated with me and proved otherwise? Till then if all you are going to do is moan, make nonsense psycho babble and then, strangely, say you enjoy it when I write then don't bother okay because you will not be getting engaged with an answer. Gazza you are a one trick pony, moan but never analyse, accuse but never debate, point but never contribute, saw tons of you, wag all day but actually say nothing.

9.) 12 Sep 2015
12 Sep 2015 14:40:22
Nonsense Psycho babble? Get a grip gaz for gods sake. The reason I don't get engaged as you call it is because there is no point.

Someone like you who feels the need to regularly vent your feelings on a rivals site is never going to change. I mean comments like that " saw tons of you" you're no better than the moronic hate element among you coming away with that crap.

Anyway forgetting all that simply answer the question. Why are you on here gaz? Easy enough question