04 Nov 2015 11:53:56
Lose to Hibs, MA trying to jail DK, lose the big tax case, MA and his F##K KING hats, and now £7.5m losses posted, feel like am stuck in a time warp, was good vibes for a while but now back to all the negative carry on front page headlines instead of back. Turning back to the Circus again. I wish this would sort its self out. Was enjoying just the football there for a while but now back to all this shi*e again.

1.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 12:02:04
Do people expect us to make a profit? Obviously we are losing money, the papers make it out like it wasn't expected and our fans and celtic fans jump on it like a couple of dugs wae beetroot.

2.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 12:37:03
get a grip m3lvo, lose to hibs, still 5pts clear. MA trying to jail DK, you said it trying. 7.5ml loss, we all knew there was losses and main shareholders say they will fund. Just try and see what you are watching (or are you? ) compared to last year.

3.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 12:47:37
Cee an lw the point I am trying to make is I was enjoying just the football minus the circus act regarding everything else, was good not to have all the sh*te but this week it is all starting to rear its ugly head again. the last few year of front page news was enough to last a life time.

4.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 12:40:52
Cee, I love that phrase, not heard it in ages, thanks for making me smile in among the "not so positive" news.

5.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 12:48:51
Does the Ashley hate DK so much that he wants him in jail for Xmas? Strange business tactics.

6.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 15:12:06
Great news about the Big Tax Case, a victory for the honest tax paying clubs. Basically this confirms what we new all along. Recruited better players that you could not afford if they had abide by tax laws. Hence you cheated the system to gain an unfair sporting advantage. This is similar to performance enhancing drugs in sport, you cannot break these rules to gain a sporting advantage and if your caught doing so you get banned and titles removed!

Wonder what will happen here.

7.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 16:17:02
Dancer what you worried about titles and that for, you are a Falkirk fan.

8.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 16:22:43
Dancer you are a bit of a chancer. The BTC decision was the opinion of judges sitting on the second appeal panel. Have you forgotten about the opinions of the many other judges who found in favour of Rangers at the previous hearings. I suppose not because those decisions were not conducive with your petty hatred for all things Rangers. Also the over riding thing about the decision was it was based on " common sense". As far as I'm aware the decision should have been based on the Law. If judicial decisions were based on common sense then surely OJ Simpson would have went down. This decision will not affect Rangers financially or the great progress we are making building an exciting, free flowing, entertaining football team so don't come on here regurgitating your sporting integrity card we have more important things to be getting on with.

9.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 16:27:04
Listen mate, diddy team supporter as well. There was no precedent until today that EBT's breached Tax laws. Celtic gave Juninho an EBT and Neil Lennon and Allan Thompson were involved in another tax avoidance scheme through a fake film company.

In 1997–98 Falkirk should have been relegated to the third tier of Scottish football but were saved because Airdrie went bust so don't come on here giving it the big sporting integrity grabo. We will be in Europe next year while your still stuck playing Alloa on a raining Wednesday night in a shabby town.

10.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 16:29:37
FYI, The lord Nimmo Smith report was final on the matter of unfair advantage and the governing bodies have already previously confirmed all titles and merits would stand. so simmer down and go research it before you post on here trying to noise us up.

11.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 17:11:41
dancer, how on God's Earth can paying people to play football relate to taking drug? Do you not understand the difference? The players were paid, not drugged.

12.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 17:46:54
Dancer: Nothing will happen there, took them long enough to come to the decision, had to get us at some point to appease the media and fans like you.

13.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 18:53:16
Airdrie went bust in 2002.
It was brought about by David Murray calling in a debt owed to one of his companies.
I think you could call that ironic.
Falkirk were saved by a fans movement. We realise how close we came to extinction and would not wish that on any club. Show some respect to others Arte et Marte .

14.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 19:24:33
A Bairn please ensure you have the right person when you accuse someone of disrespect. I never mentioned your club in my post.

15.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 20:02:43
I posted an apology almost immediately after I realised my error.
it has not been added yet.
once again I do apologise. I'm not normally on here but like to browse other clubs forums now and then to get an idea of the feelings of others in Scottish football. I had misread the placement of the poster's name.

16.) 04 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 20:44:23
A Bairn apology appreciated and accepted.

17.) 05 Nov 2015
04 Nov 2015 20:46:30
and who was falkirks biggest creditor? correct, hmrc what for? non payment of p.a.y.e., not a whole lot of difference.

18.) 05 Nov 2015
05 Nov 2015 14:05:39
DANCER

The appeal decision is obviously beyond your comprehension and you relied on the Biased Broadcasting Corporation for your info;

1- The judge was flawed when he said his decision was based on 'common sense'. The law is based on THE LAW not common sense as anyone who has ever gone to court will tell you.

2- Whether you like it or not, whether these trusts were unfair or not, THEY WERE LEGAL AT THE TIME.

19.) 06 Nov 2015
06 Nov 2015 00:46:38
I think you'll find the learned judges ( there were 3 ) were making the point that both law AND common sense overlapped here. Loudest cannot be capricious in their findings and they must be based on sound legal interpretations. This was the Court of Session - Scotland's highest court. It was not Lord Ni, mo Smith passing a PERSONAL verdict. If you read the judgement the higher Court destroys the fantasy concocted by Nimmo Smith.

20.) 06 Nov 2015
06 Nov 2015 00:47:42
Why did predictive text print 'loudest' in my last post? Gggrrr.