07 Dec 2016 06:06:24
Can't believe I'm seeing people say sell windass. He's by far one of the most exciting prospects we've had in a while. Give him time, he'll get fit and he'll get back to regular football and only improve. Selling him for £1m or £2m would be a disaster. Give him time and we'll be talking £4-5m. Same with Rossiter. Patience Bears, it's been 6months. Follow Follow. In Warbs We Trust.

1.) 07 Dec 2016
07 Dec 2016 08:06:22
He's going nowhere, why would we sell the only player who has looked good this year?

2.) 07 Dec 2016
07 Dec 2016 09:54:25
Oh he will be going somewhere if we are offered 1 million to 1.5 million we have no other means of income.

3.) 07 Dec 2016
07 Dec 2016 10:08:57
Coz we're skint that's how we'd sell him if the money was offered. plain and simple.

4.) 07 Dec 2016
07 Dec 2016 10:37:21
1-2 million is a disaster what planet are you living on? A 200k investment to tenfold over a six month period? Exact same with Rossiter. I agree with you in the sense that we should be investing in the future but we can't make that kind of money anywhere else. Rossiter would have cost at least a few million anywhere inside England as would Windass and that's why they command this fee. They haven't actually improved as assets in that sense, from a board perspective it's a very easy flip considering both haven't got off the injury bed yet. With Barton's wages, the two out-going players (Rossiter and Windass) for an exaggerated estimate of 4m total, would allow us a further 55k a week on the wage bill. This could allow us to bring in a quality player but that isn't how Warburton approaches the transfer market. The wage will 100% reinvested but who would we acquire for that kind of money that would actually benefit us? Baring in mind Championship clubs can but 15m+ for players meaning our market is even worse.

5.) 07 Dec 2016
07 Dec 2016 19:25:15
You should do well on the sale of windass, 3/ 400k is a healthy return.

6.) 08 Dec 2016
08 Dec 2016 12:00:23
Does he not have a 3.5mil buy out clouse?