10 Jan 2017 11:32:15
If we got rid of tav senderos moh and released kranjcar plus with the money we have from Barton's contract surely we would be able to afford a top players wages if we get them on a pre contract

1.) 10 Jan 2017
10 Jan 2017 12:09:04
One top player is less than what's needed, although a step in the right direction.

2.) 10 Jan 2017
10 Jan 2017 12:49:12
still wouldn't get rid of tav I think he will prove to be a great asset for the club and one we have better quality in the cb position then he will shine still think rob Kiernan and hill and Wilson and senderos are nowhere near the quality we need hill being the best of the bunch

3.) 10 Jan 2017
10 Jan 2017 13:11:28
James what are you on mate it's tav who makes the defence bad kiernan was solid with wee hodgson beside him

4.) 10 Jan 2017
10 Jan 2017 14:24:59
Spot on bear, it was tavs fault we lost the 2nd goal against Celtic Kiernan was screaming at him for not doing his job by not picking up Sinclair, he has been at fault for a few goals, and your right Kiernan has looked much better beside hill, I would play hodson every week, wether that means pushing tav forward or dropping him I don't know, but hodson must play

5.) 12 Jan 2017
11 Jan 2017 16:56:53
How many times have some of our fans to be told that we know tavernier isn't a defender! He's playing in a system warbs wants him to play which is very attack minded! We all know he's an attacking right wing-back! I certainly wouldn't get rid of him as i agree with james stirling 100%! In the advanced attacking role that warbs has him playing he creates chances for our forwards! Put it this way if we had a better defensive mid and better and quicker centre halfs we wouldn't be talking about tavs defensive deficiencies because in the system with the correct players that would be sorted out! Try and understand guys!