31 Jan 2017 12:18:46
So let me get this straight. We choose to spend what little money we have on a second choice GK.

Can't believe this hasn't been made more of an issue on here.

Unreal


1.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 12:25:15
Gilks has gone for similar fee. No cash spent


2.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 12:38:04
What part of we can't afford to buy players don't you understand, we have took in roughly 18million in season ticket sales, it costs about 30 million to run the club for a year, so who do you think is putting up the cash, the bloody board, give them a break, they are doing a great job


3.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 12:43:35
Scotty123 it is my understanding that gilks left for free therefore money spent on a replacement bench keeper imo makes no sense at all but what does with Rangers these days


4.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 12:58:48
Wigan sign Matt Gilks for undisclosed Fee. So there was a fee involved.


5.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 13:07:07
wasting money on all these players. why not just have 11 and tell them not to get injured

unreal


6.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 16:29:24
We have secured a young proven replacement with sell on value and upgraded quality of the squad. What is the issue?


7.) 31 Jan 2017
31 jan 2017 16:15:43
doesnt matter that we spent 250 k on a keeper as we had to get a replacement for gilks .

gilks was too good a keeper to be on the bench


8.) 31 Jan 2017
31 Jan 2017 23:07:21
Fd

How can you say we have upgraded the quality of the squad when he hasn't played for the club yet?