10 Feb 2017 11:02:10
Just curious to know peoples opinions.
How different would our season look if Kranjcar and Rossiter had remained fit?

1.) 10 Feb 2017
10 Feb 2017 13:06:04
Pretty obvious to me - they were brought in to improve the team and that is exactly what they would have done.

Too many on here won't consider these things when criticising our play, team, manager and board

2.) 10 Feb 2017
10 Feb 2017 13:50:00
i think rossiter would have made a difference sitting in front of our much maligned back 4 helping cover when both full backs bomb forward. from what i saw of him playing for England in the tourney last summer and a few games for us especially at dens he looked the part; loved a tackle good touch and got about the park really well

it's just my opinion but i don't think nikko would have made that much of a difference - too much is made of his injury being an excuse for our poor season. he started a number of matches including parkhead and was so far off the pace he had to be taken off before he was sent off.

i think the guy is 3/4 yrs past his best, he turned up unfit and looked miles off the pace for the SPL. he would not have influenced either game at Tynecastle for example as the game would have passed him by.

sorry bears just my opinion - hope rossiter is ok.
what's happened to josh? i'd have him in over toral

3.) 10 Feb 2017
10 Feb 2017 13:54:16
Plus Barton if that turned out better, our midfield would have been much stronger, but our problem is we just can't put the ball in the net, random. I don't think so.

4.) 10 Feb 2017
10 Feb 2017 13:59:57
BR65 so the rest of the players were not brought to improve it. Kranjar was hopeless in 75% of the games. I have my doubts about rossiter too as the recruitment is rubbish.