16 Apr 2017 17:52:23
Like a broken record here with all the views about a 'nervous' Bates and Hill being our only chance against Celtic. They're reading too many expert journalists obviously or we've got a few dozen certified psychologists as posters. Never read such rubbish.


1.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 18:34:43
I would trust bates more than keirnan.


2.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 19:17:43
What about wilson he's our most improved player the past 2 month. If pedro trusts bates against them then so do i


3.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 19:19:57
I would stick with the young lads Bates and Beerman. The only point I would make is that when we have played best against Celtic this season we have played with an extra man at the back, usually Hodson. Will be interesting to see if we revert to that. Think that either Hodson or Hill should come in, but regardless Bates and Beerman should remain in place.


4.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 19:28:25
Ross County drew with them. Why are we worrying. We will gub them twice in next couple weeks. Absolute certainty.


5.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 23:24:31
Yes put hodson rb and tav further up to replace waggy.


6.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 23:27:54
blue voice, love it. you want to put a wager on it?


7.) 16 Apr 2017
16 Apr 2017 23:53:04
Thebluevoice if that isn't jinxing us i don't know what is. What makes you so confident


8.) 17 Apr 2017
17 Apr 2017 12:22:02
No chance waghorn is getting replaced and that's good imo he's been playing well lately. I wouldn't have taverner anywhere near the celtic match.


9.) 18 Apr 2017
18 Apr 2017 22:44:59
i would put wallace on if fit not beerman as waldo done brilliantly last time stopping forester