02 May 2017 22:42:10
What we need for next season is a fairly tested Scottish league striker. I think we should give Boyce a shot!
He has scored 20 league goals so far. I recently heard that county's record fee is £100,000.
If that's the case we could get him for a steal!?!?
He can't be worse than waggy and o'hollaran

1.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 23:29:08
A fairly tested Scottish league striker.

I certainly hope not mate!

I really think we've got to aim higher than Boyce, Moult or Cummings. In my opinion we need some xfactor, someone with a bit of quality that is going to be a match winner for us. who that'll be in don't know but I don't think they already play in Scotland

2.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 01:08:25
Cummings is a match winner I've stated before on here that I wasnt convinced by him at start of season but watching him this season I honestly think he would flourish at ibrox, he has the confidence to go and score goals! Cummings and Adam Armstrong would by my targets

3.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 07:17:37
Rite guys. heres a thought. if we don't see significant investment this summer, how about we get something set up throught club 1872,in the way of a transfer kitty? ongoing direct debit. £5,£10.or if your flush add your own above this. thoughts.

4.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 08:36:03
unfortunately guys this is the calibre of player we are going to sign. Better get used to it. We should all know by now we can't afford any better.
Just the way it is going to be for a good few years yet.

5.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 09:06:19
Kris Boyd was good enough for us when all he was a Scottish league striker. I would take Boyce, why turn your nose up at someone who regularly scores 20+

6.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 09:29:58
If we're going down the route of signing a striker currently playing in scotland, then louis moult of motherwell, is a better striker than liam boyce, imho!

7.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 09:36:58
Boyd, naismith, novo came from the scottish league and they done just fine. Look let's be honest, we would love to spend 5 to 10 mil but it just won't happen. Boyce moult cummings would be better than what we have. I would prefer a better standard of player but I wouldn't say no to them. And of course they could score in our league no problem, unlike garner and waghorn.

8.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 09:39:55
Boyce? At this rate we will become even less average than we are now. Rangers are now in the position where we either go out on a limb financially and get REAL quality in or risk becoming what DK predicted. an irrelevance. I don't want the club to endanger itself. i'm a true blue. But like so many others i thought we could make a fight of it this season.

Maybe not win title but be up there battling with the Dark side. We cannot have another season like this one. If that means spending then spend even if it means hiking the price of season tickets. I would rather pay more in the knowledge we have a team on the park who can compete. We are RANGERS

9.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 13:50:04
I can't believe some folks are still banging on about signing
Cummings from the Edinburgh GREENS, remember the Scott Allan debacle, that mob will never sell any player to us unless they are absolute GUFF and we pay well above what they are worth,
Cummings is as one footed as Waggy and has only scored goals in the championship same as Waggy, do you think Petrie, Lennon and the rest of that crew would do anything to benefit Rangers,
they HATE us more than they support their own club

10.) 04 May 2017
04 May 2017 18:21:34
moult would be one of my targets as well but i wouldn't pay more than 250,000 for him and take boyce as well as back up for moult and another striker not from here.

cam belongs to naisy if we can get him and already we have a team that would do a lot better than this year.

throw in a couple of defenders and we would be a cert for second without braking the bank but if we are to be challenging next year which i think every rangers fan wants and demands then we really need big money investment or they will keep getting further and further away from us.