27 Sep 2017 21:52:36
Sorry but Pedro will never cut it . doesn’t have a clue what is required. I like many gave him the benefit of the doubt however I can’t remain quiet any longer. His signings have been poor, performances have been poor, poor in front of the media and finally showed no class in dealing with Scott Brown . He won’t survive October - whoever employed him should be chased from Ibrox . Before all have a go and accuse me of being “one of them “ I have supported rangers for over 40 years and never seen a rangers team be so soft - the way Celtic swagger around ibrox makes me sick - time for a change

1.) 27 Sep 2017
27 Sep 2017 22:04:24
I'm sure we all will welcome your 100mill to help pay everyone off and start all over AGAIN!

2.) 27 Sep 2017
27 Sep 2017 22:17:57
Well said couldn’t agree more. Pedro is isn’t the man to take us foward . he must win the next 3 games if not he needs to go . there’s is no Pedro affect on the squad at all

3.) 27 Sep 2017
27 Sep 2017 23:09:36
Bil72

What are you on about? The poster is just posting what many of us feel so why the sarcastic comment? If fans don't think it's working they are entitled to say so. Think it also speaks volumes that your reply was more about the cost of paying everyone off and starting again rather than defending the managers signings or results neither of which you can

4.) 27 Sep 2017
27 Sep 2017 23:15:40
Bil72 - Derek McKinnes doesn’t have or need 100 million yet manages to compete- loses his best players each year and yet they sit second - now that’s a good manager

5.) 28 Sep 2017
28 Sep 2017 00:17:26
I've always been supportive of Pedro's appointment because I trusted that there was a good reason for him been chosen. Rumours that he was a potential major investors preferred man for the job have dissapeared completely. It is a very strange appointment if that wasn't the reason

6.) 28 Sep 2017
28 Sep 2017 08:14:43
Teams usually get a wee bounce effect when i new manager comes in. we're still waiting on ours and he's been here from March.