22 Jan 2018 16:20:51
Read today that Norwich have apparently signed Kenny MacLean for only £150,000. 6 months after Rangers had reportedly offered double this amount and it was turned down as they wanted more money from us.

This goes on to solidify the fact that Scottish teams are continuously trying to rip us off.


1.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 17:31:26
Scottyger. could it not be the fact that it appears we are lowballing initial payments and extended terms do not suit scottish clubs. it could also be a factor that we are living hand to mouth and its highly publicized we are dependent on soft loans to stay afloat. there is also the possibility of sanctions from stock exchange IF Kings appeal against the take over panel is unsuccessful. playing devils advocate i feel these clubs are only looking after themselves. and unfortunately Rangers at this time are not trusted financially. tin hat on but trying to be realistic rather than seeing everything from the blue prospective.


2.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 18:20:53
Johnny g

Can you tell me what sanctions the takeover panel can impose on Rangers?


3.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 18:27:20
Jimshu. Answer None. The case is solely against aking


4.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 18:42:35
Yes that’s what I thought


5.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 18:50:54
The sanctions are well documented if you take your head out the sand. it is called "the cold shoulder" where no financial institute, company,
Bank or any business involved in the stock market
will entertain or do business with us. and jboy17 it is against king and the three bears for working in concert to aquire the shares they have so very much ultimately OUR problem. but hey you keep believing and everything will be fine. try having a share issue whilst getting the cold shoulder!


6.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 19:18:48
JohnnyG I am a significant shareholder 1percent. It is against king. Yes re working in concert but only he has been taken to task. Public papers go and read them


7.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 19:35:11
Also johnnyG look at papers released by company house re rangers FC. Two individuals have what is defined as significant control at rangers. They are alister Johnston and new director Barry Scott.
They define significant control as owning or having control of 50percent of share. Despite what many think king does not control rangers.
It is my belief that we will see significant change re share holding. I may well be wrong, but significant moves involving Hong Kong based fans
Please note I'm not having a pop, this info is available


8.) 22 Jan 2018
22 Jan 2018 22:17:13
JohnnyG Could be I suppose.

However, if that’s happening now then it’s possibly because we overspent on rubbish during the summer. Surely with what we spent during the summer, we’d have been able to pay out £600k to Aberdeen - they just wanted even more money at the time. Since we’ve not much of a transfer kitty available right this minute, then it seems that business is being done on the cheap until the season ticket money is available.