10 Dec 2018 18:38:43
now we are looking at GILLINGHAM striker, 13 goals in 17 games, yet everyone on here bad mouths me for even suggesting AYR UTD striker Shankland, 42 goals in 45 games? one is a Rangers fan and a bargain, the other is an un-known.
Gillingham? Stevie go to specsavers, then look at how much you have spent on un-knowns so far. Shankland WOULD get us goals, that's for sure, and he has a great discipline record too.
Who knows what or who Tom Eaves is? a lower league nothing, like some of the past mistakes we brought in under Warburton, Caixina, Murty, catch yourself on mate or you will end up another ex Rangers boss, your slip is showing a bit already with your chop, change, change again, etc.


1.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 18:56:00
Ritchie 1,the striker we should have signed instead of kyle lafferty is louis moult. This guy had a 1 in 2 scoring ratio with motherwell. God knows how many he'd have scored for us? I wanted us to sign louis moult when both warburton and caixhina were our managers. Moult IMHO, would score a very good ratio of goals for us! Moult as far as i'm concerned is a better striker than lafferty!


2.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 19:43:10
Nope sorry coop . Moult is gash . Would rather take the boy from ayr, give him a go and see what happens. It's obvious we need cover for morelos. Lafferty will run and run but need an end product. This boy with the chances we should provide forwards with looks like the answer.


3.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 20:21:36
Glad to see you have such an open mind Ritchie. I've idea why your getting so frustrated. Am sure we look at lots of players. Maybe we'll sign that boy from Gillingham, maybe we'll sign shankland. I'd like to see one of our young lads given a try. Whoever we sign I'll give them my support.


4.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 20:21:42
Aye moult is gash! At motherwell and playing in the spfl he certainly wasn't gash! In fact his record with motherwell was superb! You tell me what's gash about his scoring exploits at motherwell? Moult is a far better option than lafferty for me!


5.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 20:49:48
Lafferty has been a big let down on the field and off the field. he clearly doesn't suit gerrards type of play. i'd have taken moult over lafferty we still can get moult in january and shankland wouldn't cost the earth. in my eyes more competition for strikers role. wheel and deal mr allen players here need moving on pronto.


6.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 20:52:19
The guy from Gillingham is 26 and has played around the lower leagues, last team was Yeovil and they got rid of him surely we could do better? Even bring Doodo back, or blood a youngster, like Dallas maybe.


7.) 10 Dec 2018
10 Dec 2018 21:35:47
Have to agree with Supercooper Moult isn’t gash. He scored plenty of goals and terrorised Celtic on a few occasions. He would do a job for us and is better than Lafferty.


8.) 11 Dec 2018
11 Dec 2018 07:33:44
I personally wanted Rangers to sign Moult when he was set to leave Motherwell. He knows where the goal is, has played in the SPL fast paced environment and his scoring ratio was outstanding. He also plays with a physical aggression that puts defenders under pressure throughout a game, so I would have no hesitation in bringing him in.


9.) 13 Dec 2018
13 Dec 2018 17:02:59
Lafferty has never been very good he is full of effort but has no real natural ability whatsoever.