31 Jul 2020 17:36:51
I see a few poster say shankland isn't the answer, back in the day people said Rod wallace was a poor signing they were wrong. Give the boy a chance before judging him.

1.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 18:01:40
You just never know I suppose. I never doubted wee Wallace for a minute. Different class.

2.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 18:22:34
What a signing the wee man was 👍.

3.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 19:29:57
Another player Rangers have no interest in.

4.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 19:36:37
wallace was already playing for a team heavily involved in European competition.

5.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 19:47:09
I can't remember any negativity regarding the signing of Rod Wallace.

6.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 20:01:29
Me either stuck some people just make bs to suit their own agenda.

7.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 20:24:30
Rod the prod was a terrific wee striker 👌.

8.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 20:51:51
Wallace was welcomed as an excellent signing. As u say he had a Europe’s pedigree.

9.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 20:56:23
Not bs and certainly no agenda just sayimg give the boy a chance before righting him off.

10.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 21:25:34
No way can you compare Shankland with Wallace. What has Shankland done outside of Scotland, indeed what has he done outside the Championship. I am not saying that he is a poor player I am simply saying that there is more risk attaching that he could end up another Sandy Clark than an Ally McCoist, and he won't have a Mark Hately playing alongside him.