Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

WeAreRangers's Profile

Current Avatar:
WeAreRangers's Avatar
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


Current Profile Picture:
Click to view larger image
WeAreRangers's Profile Picture

Team: Rangers


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone: (GMT -5:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada), Bogota, Lima




WeAreRangers's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To WeAreRangers's Posts

 

 

To WeAreRangers's last 5 banter posts

 

To WeAreRangers's last 5 rumour replies

 

To WeAreRangers's last 5 banter replies

 

WeAreRangers has no Rumours Posts

 

 

WeAreRangers's banter posts with other poster's replies to WeAreRangers's banter posts

 

18 May 2017 03:56:07
Delighted Pedro called out Mcinnes behavior. My kind of manager and mcinnes proving his limitations.


1.) 18 May 2017 08:51:45
Personally thought Rangers were above this crap.
Until we do something worth shouting about, then they should all button their lip.
It might be quiet for a while though!


 

 

25 Apr 2017 04:15:41
So no one else noticed that their wing backs had ltd success. For all their possession ltd success thro the middle. The goals were scored from long balls only. Seems obvious. Decent cb decent hustle and decent closing down broon from cf's which was the job PC had given them.


1.) 25 Apr 2017 05:47:47
Tbh, they didn't need wing backs! One thing that did worry me was the zonal defence at corners. 6 men along the 6 yard line no one on the posts, and allowing them to have a 10 yard run at any high ball. Was amazed they didn't really threaten. Think Brenda might have noticed that unfortunately.


2.) 25 Apr 2017 06:48:55
Ive got to admit that zonal defending gives me the fear


3.) 25 Apr 2017 07:25:52
Will never understand why any team does zonal marking. It should be old fashioned Man for man so every player knows who they are marking and if you concede then it's clear who was at fault. Don't know why some coaches try to over complicate something so simple

{Ed001's Note - if you understood zonal marking, then you would also be able to pick out the man at fault. Just because you don't understand something, does not mean it is the problem. If players are switching off, then it does not matter what system you use, you will concede chances. I am pig sick of people moaning about zonal marking when not one of them understands how it works and think that the morons on Sly are correct when they blather on about a player being ignored because he has left the zone and all the other nonsense crap they send out to the people watching. There has never been a team that ever in the history of the game did not use some form of zonal marking as part of their set piece defending. They may have used varying degrees of man to man as well, but they always have some zonal within it.}


4.) 25 Apr 2017 11:12:03
I just don't like the fact 6ft 2 guys are getting a free run from the edge of the box like there 2 CBS had on Sunday and should have done better with.


5.) 25 Apr 2017 15:39:31
Ed

How can you say there has never been a team in the world that hasn't used zonal marking? Are you up to speed with tactics with teams in Honduras and El Salvador use? How many games have you been to Angola and Zambia to see how teams in these countries set up?

{Ed001's Note - because a man marking system still uses zonal within it. Men on the posts are zonal marking. Usually there is a man stationed ahead of the near post, who is zonal marking. I can say it because I know it is true. No team has ever set up with all of their players man marking an opponent and had no spare man zonal marking.}


6.) 25 Apr 2017 16:26:58
I agree to an extent Ed but none of our players were marking, they were all standing in a line along the 6 yarder. Yes, technically every team does do a form of zonal I. E;the posts, the edge of the 6yd at the side which the corner is taking but none of our players actually had a man


7.) 25 Apr 2017 19:04:00
Wearerangers, no one else noticed maybe because we never played with wingbacks we played with full backs.
2 Goals long balls?
Why was it not a great long pass it was the first of the game and took your defense out.
Ask any manager and they will tell u that they hate losing a goal like that because its schoolboy defending, 1 pass and we are in, bring it down lay it off, goal not a defender even got near to challenge.
2nd goal was a break away no long ball, 3 passes and we are in, schoolboy defending from Tav if he stays on his feet he can force LG away from goal, but no go to ground and take him out.
None of that is good defending.


 

 

 

WeAreRangers's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

23 May 2017 14:06:33
did he stop for a curry after the petrol station? :)


 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 May 2017 14:06:30
McKay comes on, gives up wing and we give up goal. totally comfortable till then. enough


 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 May 2017 03:38:46
R u sure it wisnae at the airport


 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 May 2017 03:36:14
Are you sure it wisnae Kenny chesney


 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 May 2017 04:08:07
The vocabulary is a give away. Even if true never bet on that.


 

 

 

WeAreRangers's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

20 May 2017 13:16:09
Excited to see youth play and you are right about Weiss


 

 

Click To View This Thread

20 May 2017 13:15:01
Leicester had player of year. Record goalscorer and international defense. Rethink


 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 May 2017 21:50:35
stewarty need more than pelter armour for that one.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 May 2017 16:22:05
Whereas you may have a good point I was very disappointed with his back tracking. Poor and poor positioning. Needs improvements but may happen if we can get the rest of the squad working


 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 May 2017 01:35:26
Great advice