Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Rangers Rumours Member Posts
bluesteve's Profile
bluesteve's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To bluesteve's Posts
To bluesteve's last 5 banter posts
To bluesteve's last 5 rumour replies
To bluesteve's last 5 banter replies
bluesteve has no Rumours Posts
bluesteve's banter posts with other poster's replies to bluesteve's banter posts
15 Jan 2015 12:59:03
What do we the fans do next?
If full boycott happens and we starve them of income then we play into hands of Ashley and he secures ownership of Ibrox and MP once the £10m - £13m loan is used up and we end up in admin 2 with no assets or having to lease these back from MA.
If we support team and protest from inside stadium then the board continue to ignore the fans wishes for them to step aside and limp on with the fans cash to pay bills while siphoning off for themselves all other income streams.
Not sure we have any options here and spivs have achieved their end game.
1.) 15 Jan 2015 13:25:31
Well mate I thought Park/King bought their shares in anticipation of something like this happing,thus enabling them to prevent it. I now ask myself why did they bother?
I also think they should make a statement as to what they can do about this,if anything.
2.) 15 Jan 2015 13:34:15
Brian Kennedy saying this may not be a bad thing as it gives the board 2 options he also says ashley should give an undertaking that the stadium will only ever be use for R. F. C to play football.
r. f
3.) 15 Jan 2015 14:13:17
Ah well,its no bad thing because Brian Kennedy said so,he has no ties to the place,emotional or otherwise.Other funding is available,borrowing on the strengh of the stadium should be THE last resort.It stinks man.
4.) 15 Jan 2015 14:45:51
See u gkk I'm just posting something I read and so much for u not commenting on my posts remember u said that.
r. f
From my understanding of this, the notices of security, lodged with the Register of Scotland on 15 January, mean that only Sports Direct can be granted security on Ibrox and MP for a 35-day period. By doing this Ashley has made it impossible, for the next 35 days, to accept the security condition of the Three Bears' offer thus meaning the Three Bears £6.5m loan secured on MP cannot be accepted.
Only positive I can see is that surely David Somers position is under even more scrutiny now as I believe he said in statements that Ibrox would never be used as security against a loan.
Is this game, set and match Ashley or can anyone see a way out of this.
Bit harsh - the guy has never been given a run in the team and often played out of position
24 Mar 2015 13:50:57
Think he was suggesting we shouldn't believe everything that we read and he is happy at Ibrox.
If Ashley is doing this out of spite then he still needs our board to allow him to. It is the board that is allowing him to position himself in this way. The Easdales and Somers have turned down all external investors money which would go to the club in favour of Ashley's LOANS. They must be getting something for this.