Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

rglen8's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:
UsernamePoints
203.)   Scotty1236
204.)   mydogskip6
205.)   Brad766
206.)   rglen86
207.)   SGIS19726
208.)   Bhrydobhoy6
209.)   DUGALD1236
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




rglen8's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To rglen8's Posts

 

 

To rglen8's last 5 rumour replies

 

To rglen8's last 5 banter replies

 

rglen8 has no Rumours Posts

 

 

rglen8 has no Banter Posts

 

 

rglen8's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Feb 2017 00:34:44
Would of said this in my initial post. Andy1872 they did bust a gut for mw but weren't as good as they thought. As bad as some englishman think our premier leauge is its a cut above leauge one or teams in leauge two if you push the boat out. Better than a hard as POTY could handle if I remember right.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Feb 2017 00:06:15
Wide spectrum of views some less credible I may add. Few quick questions.

1)How long is warbs new bumper deal and who realistically would head hunt him and pay compensation after his relative budget in the spl and what he had achieved with it comparitavily?

2) genuine question on his contract and if he has full control of the football side of things? Does he have the final say on every player?

3) link to Q2. Are there no players that could be picked as targets and approved and offered to MW from a board of football men with an interest and presumably contacts? This elusive king dough could of been spent even if mw couldn't find the players himself to benifit the team.

4) to get a decent manager is there really any incentive to join rangers?

The reason for Q4 and a valid one and it was commented on above. Approval for Europe is still a grey area and rules will have to be bent till breaking point to allow participation. Ashley hanging over and the other finance issues. It is not as simple as saying "the ex Liverpool guy" took over and all was rosey.

BR inherited a squad of underachieving international players lost with no motivation that had talent and value. He also could ask 40k a week which isn't massive but could negotiate a massive bonus for cl/ European participation so he took the jump because he knew the foundations were there and he could have a go.

For me you guys have made the same mistakes over again, allys wages/ team wages, letting crook (s) in and not using those gate recipts properly. The argument of miler and hill getting new deals personifies it. Weir playing till the age he did altered your thinking in a terrible way.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

01 Feb 2017 22:19:49
B16jk - if someone bids

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Nov 2016 21:46:20
Charlie adam? What does he earn? Barton was tempted in on a Base rate wage with an enticing bonus structure . Same as rodgers. barton clocked it sharpish and will depart. Few months in the dressing room and some home truths, a confidentiality agreement later, 2 weeks wages and he has jumped. He is a wee w#nk but given time in your mf and managed correctly I think he would of been asset.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Nov 2016 21:33:04
Laugherty could of only dreamed of Sammys career. Come on james. That 10% was goals against us. The latter was in Europe. I'll admit I am a fan of Sammy. To be honest I'd pay kLs taxi to ibrox to sign as long as the invoice had 'the' omitted. No point kicking.

rglen8

 

 

 

rglen8's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Feb 2017 02:10:51
Aberdeen have aged and faded imo. Haven't freshened up. Still in there and are a few signings away from where they might of been. Next games. Hearts I'd say watch them bears. Not this campaign but next. Don't give an underdog the scent of blood. Too late imo. Let this one go.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 01:47:08
Mols
30-35m over the years down? He was ment to of been a 20m investor back in the day. Do you honestly think he made nothing? I'd say he made a stack through loophole accountancy. Or when things started to go wrong murray kept quiet and threw him under a 20m pound bus? Take your pick.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 01:33:12
Parky. add up what king "ect" has put in. "Ect" more than king you'll find. The question was about king v ashley though. King aquired rangers and also crippled the club by his actions.

I'd actually like anyone to pick apart every piece of account data that is actually available. Add soft loans, season tickets and the wee cut of any merch, fan donations etc. Line that up against posted losses and the difference may be your figure. I might be wrong but has DK ever said exactly what he personally has spent since taking over till now? He hasn't in my mind but I may of missed it. There are hoards of fans screaming for his head for not spending a penny and to my eyes he hasn't and hasn't replied or publicly defended himself with a counter quote or any real sum of money.

Do some extensive reading on how he aquired rangers. How he encouraged starvation of ticket sales and encouraged the company to be delisted, sorry for a nomad to be brought in. His failed alleged search for a nomad was nothing more than smoke and mirrors. For a guy that is an international business man you and many others have been sold down the river by him doing "ooh a didnae know that wiz gonnae happen" routine.
Wake up

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

29 Dec 2015 10:08:26
Quoted as "party tunes" in today's DR. Couldn't make it up.

rglen8

 

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Dec 2015 22:33:37
More I've read down the more I've seen fans not happy with it so fair play. There are a few good posters on here that see through the nonsense and I won't name my favourites but you bears can probably guess the posters that give me the best reads.
One thing I will say, big w aside I'm kept informed 😆.

rglen8