Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

slydog's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




slydog's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To slydog's Posts

 

 

To slydog's last 5 rumours posts

 

To slydog's last 5 banter posts

 

To slydog's last 5 rumour replies

 

To slydog's last 5 banter replies

 

slydog's rumours posts with other poster's replies to slydog's rumours posts

 

29 Nov 2016 21:15:53
Guy on my social media posted a selfie of him and waghorn after he delivered a parcel to the new house he's bought and going to be living in so doubt he'll be going anywhere in january hopefully he can kick on rest of season but unless MW changes his system waghorn just doesn't fit in unless he plays him through the middle but can't see him getting game time there either.

slydog

 

 

26 Oct 2016 06:30:42
Read online that the reason harry forrester isn't involved with the squads right now is because of a fall out with MW and MOH and tav can't be in the same room as each other without arguing. any one else heard this or able to clarify or deny?

slydog

1.) 26 Oct 2016 09:05:32
Maybe Forrester is too committed for Warburton who seems to like pansies like McKay that won't fight for the ball. As for MOH and Tav, if that is the case then there is only one winner and it is not MOH. So many questions which is worrying. Just a shame we don't have a proper captain and by all accounts, a manager that can bring the players together. We need things sorting and fast. I would much rather have Forrester in the team than McKay. At least Forrester looks the part for the top division in Scotland.


2.) 26 Oct 2016 11:12:07
where did u hear this you slydog? please don't say my source told me lol.


3.) 26 Oct 2016 11:43:26
I heard it was because Rangers would have to pay all his previous clubs £5m each, immediately on hitting a set number of appearances. I will never allow my source's identity to be revealed, please do not ask me to.


4.) 26 Oct 2016 11:55:36
How can Rangers be liable to all his "previous" clubs? The contract for a player is between rangers and the club they bought the player from - not any previous club!

Rangers would never negotiate a contract where they have to pay £5m to each of his previous clubs for a player after a certain number of appearances! If that was the case, I would rather have paid £5m upfront and bought a much better player.

Cuillin72 - that is beyond ridiculous! Stop posting sh1te!


5.) 26 Oct 2016 12:01:54
How would they need to pay all his previous clubs 5 mill if they sold him for a fraction of that, i smell bullshit.


6.) 26 Oct 2016 12:48:11
hes been injured for the last while. groin issues nothing to do with a fall out or paying money.


7.) 26 Oct 2016 12:49:51
Some people clearly don't understand sarcasm.


8.) 26 Oct 2016 13:09:00
I think that's called sarcasm lol.


9.) 26 Oct 2016 14:15:15
Holy shoot. I have just read some of the responses on here. I am sorry I posted it on here and not on the banter page. Give me strength, lol. Unbelievable Jeff.


10.) 27 Oct 2016 19:12:41
hahahaha

Can't believe anyone thought you were being serious.

Bring back Barton, he will whip the lads into shape, Andy has let his performances slip since Barton's been away on holiday.


 

 

 

slydog's banter posts with other poster's replies to slydog's banter posts

 

12 Feb 2017 13:35:37
I assume our youth polices regarding them playing against older professionals and playing 4-3-3 throughout every youth level will be scrapped now aswell that MW is away?

slydog

1.) 12 Feb 2017 16:31:02
Why would you assume that? Absolute tosh!


 

 

27 Nov 2016 10:00:55
Red bull will never invest in us and I don't want it either does anyone do any research on here? Red bull bought salzburg mostly because there based there and the fan hate them they changed everything right down to the strips told the fans there history meant nothing now they red bull the fans are trying to make a new side called salzburg they have the out the old one do we really want that? Also they own leipzig who sit top of the bundesliga and uefa states that beacause of red bulls involvement in these teams they can't play in the same european competitions which they are both on course to do in the summer be interesting to see how that manifests itself in the summer, we have already been burned and still being burned by our last investor ashley let's accept our place just now do things properly although will take years and some fans can stop yearning for a sugar daddy investor, and anyway red bull are not rangers men so according to king at the AGM he won't want there investment anyway.

slydog

1.) 27 Nov 2016 10:52:17
Are you massively hung over mate?

I can't say that Red Bull would be a bad thing and I can't say they would be a good thing because I don't honestly know.


2.) 27 Nov 2016 12:00:37
Massivley rafbob haha.


3.) 27 Nov 2016 13:28:16
Total bollocks. Red Bull would be an excellent investor. Would rather see that around ibrox than sports direct .


4.) 27 Nov 2016 15:25:11
We should be looking to get a main sponsor i. e. Redbull for stadium naming and shirt sponsorship not club ownership like people are saying?


5.) 28 Nov 2016 11:33:35
if red bull come in i'd be happy if they took over but I honestly think they will be our next sponsor I don't think they wil buy us but yes big chap we do crave a sugar daddy and why not .


 

 

26 Nov 2016 09:34:16
Guys can we please put this red bull rumour to bed it would never get ff the ground for a number of reasons

Red bull already have invested in 2 clubs salzburg and leipzig which according to uefa if both qualify for the same tournament i. e champions league is not allowed which would cause more problems for them if we were qualify be interesting to see what they do in that regard come the summer if both them in europe
Also they changed everything regarding salzburg right down to the strip and have made them unrecognisable to the point the fans are trying to start a new team would we really want this?
Why would be happy with this sort of investment its dangerous look at what's happened with sports directs investments. i'm coming to terms with the fact that we have no money and its going to take years to reach celtics level but let's not rush into crazy investments again try and do it the proper way
Also as king stated yesterday red bull are not rangers men so he wouldn't want there investment anyway.

slydog

1.) 26 Nov 2016 17:21:36
" to the point the fans were trying to start a new team" and they say rangers fans don't do irony, lol 😁.


2.) 26 Nov 2016 21:00:59
Slydog, its not buying the club that i've heard red bull are doing, regarding rangers. Its taking over from 32Red as our new shirt sponsors, starting after this season, when our current 3 year deal with 32Red expires!

I've also heard that its a lot more money for our club, than our current deal with 32Red. Also been told that there's a possibility that red bull will become our energy drinks partner, with the possibility of a stand being sponsored and named after them. Not actually owning and buying our club matey!


3.) 27 Nov 2016 10:11:11
Its still dual interests is it not? Same as ashley and newcastle, I didn't say they would own us but have you seen what they have done to the clubs they have invested in? Stop chasing a sugar daddy.


 

 

07 Nov 2016 09:19:59
A european spot is all good and well like some off you are saying but with this team we won't make the group stages so it won't solve our problems, its investment we need imo for better players to take us to the Level can't see were that is going to come from though.

slydog

1.) 07 Nov 2016 09:24:28
Yes very true Slydog, depending on what draw we get we won't make it. however if we do finish 2nd or 3rd we will invest in the squad so that we do make the group stages.


2.) 07 Nov 2016 10:15:05
You say you will "invest". So tell me, where is the money coming from? .


3.) 07 Nov 2016 10:33:56
Bhampot, no doubt it will be a loan. we spent money this year, no doubt we will spend in the summer again, or we could steal a few players from down south, plenty of good players are available.


4.) 07 Nov 2016 10:35:05
nope not telling you bhampot.


5.) 07 Nov 2016 10:51:31
I thought gers played ok first half yesterday. Miller and garner should have had us 3 up before they scored. The worry for me is the lack of fitness in the team they can't last a full game. Every 2nd half of games there's a noticeable drop in pace even killie game pace dropped.


6.) 07 Nov 2016 13:19:17
McKay said that was not us today, well I have news for him "it was". More of the same old excuses after a poor performance. The premier league standard is extremely poor yet we cannot win regularly. Ross County, Kilmarnock, Hamilton and St Johnstone have all taken points from Rangers. MW is not getting the best out of the team, we are way behind celtic but we should be a class above the rest.


7.) 07 Nov 2016 13:30:08
Why are we accepting this as supporters? its the most basic asset in any sport to be in peak physical condition! Its a discrace tbh that RANGERS players are in that state on a football park.


8.) 07 Nov 2016 13:55:31
IF we managed to get into the Europa league qualifiers we would last 1 maybe 2 rounds. No way under this manager are we getting into the group stages. We are a poor side easy to play against and wide open at the back. God knows what a good side would do to us.


9.) 07 Nov 2016 15:10:00
All the players signed are from English leagues, why don't we start looking abroad, there are far better players and for less money.


 

 

29 Oct 2016 22:07:23
Good to see a good perfermance today at home to killie but ill be honest it was the least I expected one game at home against a team that are piss poor and with players who once stole a wage from us not so long ago and failed to get promotion won't change the fact that we've been poor this season one game doesn't mean we have turned a corner it was good to watch though and hopefully this can be a catalyst but a 3-0 home win against that pish doesn't get MW off the hook for me.

slydog

1.) 29 Oct 2016 22:27:23
A step in the right direction is better than the alternative and it may well be the turning point of our season.


2.) 29 Oct 2016 23:13:46
That same poor team you speak of was the exact same team, to a man, that beat Hearts 2-0 at Tynecastle.

It's the league that is completely poor and the only decent teams in it are ourselves and the other lot from Glesga and I don't mean Thistle. The rest are complete dross.

Our "shocking", start to the season has left us in 2nd place out right. Not too shabby considering it was as if we were fighting off relegation, the way some were acting this week.


3.) 30 Oct 2016 00:14:16
Thorn76

Please don't lower yourself to the playground banter of we beat this team who beat them so were tbe champions nonsence I agree the league is poor and what effing sickens me is we are fighting and dropping points against these teams that you call "poor" and " dross" are the teams were dropping points against never in my life have I ever seen us so far behind celtic in every aspect of football on and off the pitch and I can't see this changing and as hard as it is too accept and I never will is we are now a team that is fighying to be the best of the rest and altho we sit 2nd were making very effing hard work of it so far all I hear from my celtic mates is for every fiver and you know what its breaking my heart because I can't see us challenging celtic for a very very long time and I can't accept bein second best to that mob and fellow bears getting hard over a 3-0 home win against killie and celebrating being 2nd is destroying me.


4.) 30 Oct 2016 00:15:25
And the killiegame wasnt at tynecastle either thorn it was rugby park.


5.) 30 Oct 2016 00:42:56
We shouldn't be dropping points against those teams, completely agreed.

That will hopefully change after beating Kilmarnock today, some suggest it was best performance since Scottish Cup SF. The reason that "playground banter" is mentioned is because that's really all you really have to go on. A team is really only as good as there last game.

You can analyse playing styles, shots on target, whether they play counter attack, whether they put 10 men behind the ball and so on, it's a results business and they managed to get a result that our fans would be happy to get against Hearts days before they played us.

Would ask you a question sly, does it not irritate you that were going into games like Hearts and Aberdeen and maybe even St Johnstone away from home and fans are saying "I'd take a point here", does my head in when fans expectations are such as they are.


6.) 30 Oct 2016 00:30:19
@slydog - so you've never seen us as far away from Celtic? Did you only start following Rangers this season because we've been in a far worse position these past 4 years. To blame MW for all our woes is a tad extreme in my opinion.


7.) 30 Oct 2016 01:24:36
Slydog your being a right downer man wheres the postivity get behind your team and keep your head up that's what a real fan does.


8.) 30 Oct 2016 09:01:56
Surely the manager is exactly where the blame stops? He picks the players , he decides which players he want's , he trained the players all week, he sets out the tactics and he should be responsible for results good or bad . It's a sad indictment that ross county and the sheep created much more against us and gave us harder games than your team, but I'm glad your happy with that I know I am 😉.


9.) 30 Oct 2016 09:29:29
A defeat or draw in our next game could see us slip down to 4th or 5th so it's difficult to get too excited about being 2nd. Thought Kilmarnock were the worst team I've seen this season not surprising Celtic took 6 off them and Aberdeen took 4.


10.) 30 Oct 2016 10:14:45
Some people are never happy. Great result yesterday. Great atmosphere. Great way of remembering our fallen heroes on Poppy Day at ibrox. More of that please.


11.) 30 Oct 2016 10:16:40
Slydog. Thank god you weren't around when Celtic won the European cup and nine in a row . That was a hard time for a gers fan I can assure you once we get retail side sorted and mw can take Rodgers on in a fair fight you'll see the difference then.


12.) 30 Oct 2016 12:24:46
Aye biffo, whits way you? If, if and ands were pots and pans! Honestly you crack me up! Why do you follow rangers mate? If I felt like you i'd follow hockey or something!


 

 

 

slydog's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 18:18:02
I. don't read they papers mate so you may well have . I've seen it on here plenty aswell but just can't see it happnin for many reasons but don't get me wrong that doesn't mean I wouldn't want there investment, someones investment, anybodys investment haha.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 13:04:03
I don't even think the tabloids have mentioned it either james.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 13:12:01
I really do hope your right in your op supercooper it would signal a way out this mess but just can't see us getting away from this ashley contract its costing us millions plus court fees and dk is no doubt trying but it seems no further forward sinse his statement in the summer but hope i'm wrong if not then its in rangers interests he swallows his pride and gets round the table with ashley and see if there's wiggleroom these in court battles are costing us dearly its hard enough financially in scotland without a merch deal.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 05:51:17
And its through ashley that jd and watever other outlet is selling the strips which was what I meant he decides who, why, where in this deal.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 05:49:07
"Make our own kit"? Just proves how much u haven't got a clue about what you post on here there's no money to be made for any club in the world making there own kit, as regards to strips bein sold in JD without rangers permission proves that DK has no say in rangers retail deal atall puma and ashley are sittin on thousands of unsold stock which rangers buy bk at the end of the season a clause that in the retail contract so the boycott of strips is futile anyway were stuck with ashley for 7 years the sooner u and dk realise this the better.

slydog

 

 

 

slydog's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

29 Nov 2016 21:19:11
The guy conner from barnsley is a free agent in the summer and the commentator when they played forest recently said he's been outstanding this year he's relatively young aswell so think we'll struggle to get him.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Nov 2016 12:00:37
Massivley rafbob haha.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Nov 2016 10:11:11
Its still dual interests is it not? Same as ashley and newcastle, I didn't say they would own us but have you seen what they have done to the clubs they have invested in? Stop chasing a sugar daddy.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Oct 2016 15:48:03
Last I checked supercoopereleven this was a site to express opinions be it negative or positive and open it to debate which is sonething you clearly don't grasp any negitive comments and you shoot everyone down like some sort of cyber bully if u don't like negative comments try debating instead of banging your chest and whinging like a wummin you must be great fun at social events.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Oct 2016 00:15:25
And the killiegame wasnt at tynecastle either thorn it was rugby park.

slydog