Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

slydog's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




slydog's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To slydog's Posts

 

 

To slydog's last 5 rumours posts

 

To slydog's last 5 banter posts

 

To slydog's last 5 rumour replies

 

To slydog's last 5 banter replies

 

slydog's rumours posts with other poster's replies to slydog's rumours posts

 

29 Nov 2016 21:15:53
Guy on my social media posted a selfie of him and waghorn after he delivered a parcel to the new house he's bought and going to be living in so doubt he'll be going anywhere in january hopefully he can kick on rest of season but unless MW changes his system waghorn just doesn't fit in unless he plays him through the middle but can't see him getting game time there either.

slydog

 

 

26 Oct 2016 06:30:42
Read online that the reason harry forrester isn't involved with the squads right now is because of a fall out with MW and MOH and tav can't be in the same room as each other without arguing. any one else heard this or able to clarify or deny?

slydog

1.) 26 Oct 2016 09:05:32
Maybe Forrester is too committed for Warburton who seems to like pansies like McKay that won't fight for the ball. As for MOH and Tav, if that is the case then there is only one winner and it is not MOH. So many questions which is worrying. Just a shame we don't have a proper captain and by all accounts, a manager that can bring the players together. We need things sorting and fast. I would much rather have Forrester in the team than McKay. At least Forrester looks the part for the top division in Scotland.


2.) 26 Oct 2016 11:12:07
where did u hear this you slydog? please don't say my source told me lol.


3.) 26 Oct 2016 11:43:26
I heard it was because Rangers would have to pay all his previous clubs £5m each, immediately on hitting a set number of appearances. I will never allow my source's identity to be revealed, please do not ask me to.


4.) 26 Oct 2016 11:55:36
How can Rangers be liable to all his "previous" clubs? The contract for a player is between rangers and the club they bought the player from - not any previous club!

Rangers would never negotiate a contract where they have to pay £5m to each of his previous clubs for a player after a certain number of appearances! If that was the case, I would rather have paid £5m upfront and bought a much better player.

Cuillin72 - that is beyond ridiculous! Stop posting sh1te!


5.) 26 Oct 2016 12:01:54
How would they need to pay all his previous clubs 5 mill if they sold him for a fraction of that, i smell bullshit.


6.) 26 Oct 2016 12:48:11
hes been injured for the last while. groin issues nothing to do with a fall out or paying money.


7.) 26 Oct 2016 12:49:51
Some people clearly don't understand sarcasm.


8.) 26 Oct 2016 13:09:00
I think that's called sarcasm lol.


9.) 26 Oct 2016 14:15:15
Holy shoot. I have just read some of the responses on here. I am sorry I posted it on here and not on the banter page. Give me strength, lol. Unbelievable Jeff.


10.) 27 Oct 2016 19:12:41
hahahaha

Can't believe anyone thought you were being serious.

Bring back Barton, he will whip the lads into shape, Andy has let his performances slip since Barton's been away on holiday.


 

 

 

slydog's banter posts with other poster's replies to slydog's banter posts

 

19 Mar 2017 17:56:59
Sc11 you jave posted two or three times in the last few months saying your source said we were dropping puma and going to under armour then it was NB and your source was usually spot on, further proof you talk nothing but bull, now you say you haven't heard a thing regarding who's making them

slydog

1.) 19 Mar 2017 19:19:40
Slydog take a good read at your post! Yes i did say i was told about us supposedly going to drop puma with under armour and new balance rumoured to be in the frame!

Now have you got that bit? Now my post earlier on there i was stating that i and many others have heard nothing regarding Dave King on this! Understand Dave King!, not my source! comprehend?

Into the bargain this is a rumours site, yes surely you've guessed it by now, we post on here info among fellow bears, about rumours we've heard!

Hope i've simplified this for you! So before you go accusing people of things, read peoples posts properly so you can at least back up what your spouting!


 

 

08 Mar 2017 17:38:28
This recruitment process is nothing short of a fecking joke. we will have a manger this day, that day, next week what's going on. the record seem certain pedro will be the new manger but I've not seen any quotes from him, his club, his agent or even us regarding him and offering him a platform to the EPL after king slated warbs for it. and the DOF should have a say who the new manager is for obvious reasons we haven't even got one of them yet. rangers are making a complete and total utter arse of this.4 weeks ago there was a "plan" well what exactly is it getting more embarrassing by the day

slydog

1.) 08 Mar 2017 19:03:13
There were no CV, so, interviews or new Manager. Just King and Co leading you guys down the garden path.


 

 

25 Feb 2017 15:01:29
If you look across the city celtic paid top dollar for a good manager who has improved some of there players to a good level i genuinly think that no matter who comes in as manager they won't be able to improve our players because they simply just are not good enough players for this level there ceiling was the championship they really are that bad they can't me improved by any manager we need a clear out but what club which could offer fees for them would even offer in the first place there absolute muck we haven't recieved money from a transfer sinse lewis mcloed and that will continue because nobody will want these players and we can't afford to even release them we signed most of them for nothing which speaks volumes to me aswell we will need abt 6/ 7 good signings in aummer to consolidate 2nd next second but have no money to make this level signings so what do we do?

slydog

1.) 25 Feb 2017 15:18:52
Every player can be improved by good coaching at any level. We have been playing a system that does not suit our players and should have been altered depending on the opposition.

We have no confidence at all. a good manager would transform our group but a youth coach is a youth coach and should only be a very temporary situation


2.) 25 Feb 2017 15:56:05
Utter rubbish.


3.) 25 Feb 2017 16:02:13
Meant to BR65 not slydog.


4.) 25 Feb 2017 16:24:37
What do we do? We continue to support them. No one will take the likes of Tavie? Utter garbage, our problem is CB I said all along we need one what was amazing was Warb never saw it. that's why he ain't there. But who is the help? We need a COF first. Then a manager will come in.


5.) 25 Feb 2017 17:14:54
I would play Hodson against St Johnstone who is better defensively than Tav.
Tav is often caught out of position which leaves us open to a counter attack by the opposing team.
We have Bates but is this the time to introduce young players - i would say NO.


6.) 25 Feb 2017 17:28:46
the centre backs are junior level


7.) 25 Feb 2017 18:38:53
So what your suggesting KFraser is that there is no worthwhile role for coaches or managers?

Are you really suggesting that a player cannot be improved by good coaching? Jeez!


8.) 25 Feb 2017 20:15:05
BR65, I played at a reasonable level, never professional, but I can honestly say I never experienced a coach making an average player player better than he was. I did see real talent never progress during their mid and late teens. At professional level I believe you either have the belief or not and I knew a lot of amateurs who were better than those we see on TV today. The role of the coach is overplayed.


 

 

12 Feb 2017 13:35:37
I assume our youth polices regarding them playing against older professionals and playing 4-3-3 throughout every youth level will be scrapped now aswell that MW is away?

slydog

1.) 12 Feb 2017 16:31:02
Why would you assume that? Absolute tosh!


 

 

27 Nov 2016 10:00:55
Red bull will never invest in us and I don't want it either does anyone do any research on here? Red bull bought salzburg mostly because there based there and the fan hate them they changed everything right down to the strips told the fans there history meant nothing now they red bull the fans are trying to make a new side called salzburg they have the out the old one do we really want that? Also they own leipzig who sit top of the bundesliga and uefa states that beacause of red bulls involvement in these teams they can't play in the same european competitions which they are both on course to do in the summer be interesting to see how that manifests itself in the summer, we have already been burned and still being burned by our last investor ashley let's accept our place just now do things properly although will take years and some fans can stop yearning for a sugar daddy investor, and anyway red bull are not rangers men so according to king at the AGM he won't want there investment anyway.

slydog

1.) 27 Nov 2016 10:52:17
Are you massively hung over mate?

I can't say that Red Bull would be a bad thing and I can't say they would be a good thing because I don't honestly know.


2.) 27 Nov 2016 12:00:37
Massivley rafbob haha.


3.) 27 Nov 2016 13:28:16
Total bollocks. Red Bull would be an excellent investor. Would rather see that around ibrox than sports direct .


4.) 27 Nov 2016 15:25:11
We should be looking to get a main sponsor i. e. Redbull for stadium naming and shirt sponsorship not club ownership like people are saying?


5.) 28 Nov 2016 11:33:35
if red bull come in i'd be happy if they took over but I honestly think they will be our next sponsor I don't think they wil buy us but yes big chap we do crave a sugar daddy and why not .


 

 

 

slydog's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 18:18:02
I. don't read they papers mate so you may well have . I've seen it on here plenty aswell but just can't see it happnin for many reasons but don't get me wrong that doesn't mean I wouldn't want there investment, someones investment, anybodys investment haha.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 13:04:03
I don't even think the tabloids have mentioned it either james.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 13:12:01
I really do hope your right in your op supercooper it would signal a way out this mess but just can't see us getting away from this ashley contract its costing us millions plus court fees and dk is no doubt trying but it seems no further forward sinse his statement in the summer but hope i'm wrong if not then its in rangers interests he swallows his pride and gets round the table with ashley and see if there's wiggleroom these in court battles are costing us dearly its hard enough financially in scotland without a merch deal.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 05:51:17
And its through ashley that jd and watever other outlet is selling the strips which was what I meant he decides who, why, where in this deal.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Nov 2016 05:49:07
"Make our own kit"? Just proves how much u haven't got a clue about what you post on here there's no money to be made for any club in the world making there own kit, as regards to strips bein sold in JD without rangers permission proves that DK has no say in rangers retail deal atall puma and ashley are sittin on thousands of unsold stock which rangers buy bk at the end of the season a clause that in the retail contract so the boycott of strips is futile anyway were stuck with ashley for 7 years the sooner u and dk realise this the better.

slydog

 

 

 

slydog's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

29 Nov 2016 21:19:11
The guy conner from barnsley is a free agent in the summer and the commentator when they played forest recently said he's been outstanding this year he's relatively young aswell so think we'll struggle to get him.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Nov 2016 12:00:37
Massivley rafbob haha.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Nov 2016 10:11:11
Its still dual interests is it not? Same as ashley and newcastle, I didn't say they would own us but have you seen what they have done to the clubs they have invested in? Stop chasing a sugar daddy.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Oct 2016 15:48:03
Last I checked supercoopereleven this was a site to express opinions be it negative or positive and open it to debate which is sonething you clearly don't grasp any negitive comments and you shoot everyone down like some sort of cyber bully if u don't like negative comments try debating instead of banging your chest and whinging like a wummin you must be great fun at social events.

slydog

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Oct 2016 00:15:25
And the killiegame wasnt at tynecastle either thorn it was rugby park.

slydog