Rangers Banter Archive July 10 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


10 Jul 2012 22:20:40
Heard from good source at Falkirk that clubs will have the vote on Friday [or else]. He reckons that there maybe a proposal to reject even SFL3 for TRFC on the basis of "no 3 years accounts". I wish some fans would stop bragging that we will be playing in SFL1 or indeed the majority view that it will be SFL3. It makes us look arrogant and i sense other clubs just itching to throw egg in our face.
there's no sense blaming other clubs for the mess that we're in - if any other club had done what we've done, we would be voting exactly the same way
Take punishment - however sore, and hope we still have a team in a year or two.

Believable11 Unbelievable9

Here we go again can someone point me to the rules where it says you need 3 years accounts please .

Agree1 Disagree3

They don't need it, it is for new clubs, let me explain.

Alex Thomson has been able to get some feedback from the football authorities for his latest blog post.

Read the whole piece, which comments on what FIFA and UEFA have said, but I hope he excuses me repeating below the response he got from the SFA.

“Looming large, how can “Rangers” gain league/SFA membership when they cannot produce requisite three years of accounts?

The SFA answer:

” the…policy relates to applications for a new membership. In this case, Rangers Newco will be applying for the transfer of an existing membership held with the Oldco.

Rangers Oldco submitted the necessary financial information for 2009 and 2010. It did not submit for the year 2011, which resulted in the Judicial Panel sanctioning the club a total of £160,000 for various breaches of its Articles of Association, and also imposing a transfer embargo which has been subsequently set aside after the Court of Session ruling by Lord Glennie.”

That is – transferring old to new is not the same as a new club pitching up and wanting in.”

The licence requirements are contained in the SFA requirements on Club Licensing. Part 8 includes the Legal, Admin and Financial Criteria.

Clubs are required to produce:- a summary of financial information covering the reporting year for 2011 and the previous two years i.e. 2010 and 2009 as detailed below. The required information, taken from the annual audited accounts for the years referred to is as follows:-

Turnover

Wages (Total Payroll Costs)

Wages to Turnover Ratio

Profit or Loss for Period

Net Assets at Period End

Net Debt at Period End

 

The SFA justification seems to be that there is no need for three years’ accounts because “Rangers FC” have been punished for not producing the accounts for 2011.

There are two relevant aspects of a licensing system. The system is designed to enforce standards. There are therefore certain regulatory requirements that must be fulfilled for the member to retain or obtain a membership.

Separately there are penalties for failure to fulfil the necessary licensing conditions.

The effectiveness of the licensing system is undermined if a participant can avoid meeting requirements simply by paying a penalty. This is why, for example, the penalty for failing to provide a specimen of breath is the same as for failing a breath test!

The failure to provide accounts is merely one part of the “Disrepute” charge. The fine imposed for bringing the game into disrepute totalled £160,000, being the maximum permissible. This covered the following, as detailed in the Statement of Reasons by SFA Tribunal :-

“The Disciplinary Charge 4 is bringing the game into disrepute. The charge then sets out the particular conduct which supports that charge. There were six elements set out.

It should be noted that the Judicial Panel Protocol Paragraph 11.5.4.11 permits multiple disciplinary charges being brought in respect of a single act or omission.

The six elements alleged were

1 failing to procure the disclosure of his disqualification to the Scottish FA by Mr Craig Whyte.

2 failing to comply with the rules of the PLUS Stock Exchange rules by failing to disclose the disqualification of Mr Craig Whyte.

3 failing to lodge annual accounts by 31 December 2011 in terms of s447 of the Companies Act 2006.

4 failing to hold an annual general meeting by 1January 2012 in terms of s336 of the Companies Act 2012.

5 non-payment of PAYE income tax, National Insurance Contributions and Value Added Tax to HMRC.

6 failing to pay due sums to Dunfermline Athletic Football Club by 21 February 2012 in respect of a Scottish Premier League match played on 11 February 2012 pursuant to Rule C.14.5 of the Rules of the Scottish Premier League.”

As regards the penalty the Judicial Panel stated:-

“In respect that the maximum fines which could be imposed by the Tribunal were limited to £160,000, which appears but a small fraction of an ordinary month’s expenditure for Rangers FC, it appeared to the Tribunal that the circumstances of Rangers FC were not going to be significantly affected by any fine which the Tribunal could impose.”  

If Rangers Football Club PLC had not entered administration, and had all its assets and business sold off, would it have been granted a new SFA Licence, even though the 2011 accounts had not been produced?

Other conditions include having appropriate Public Liability, Employers Liability, Product Liability and Personal Accident Insurance. The SFA position would appear to suggest that, as long as the club pays a fine for not having these elements, they could get a licence without having them!

In any event, the accounts have been prepared. Reading the Duff and Phelps Proposal 5 April 2012 issued by the administrators we see the following:-

“The UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations 2010 require certain confirmations from licence applicants in relation to financial management matters. Amongst the key requirements are that the Club needs to:

Have completed, audited accounts signed off on a going concern basis. Given the uncertainty of the Club’s financial position the accounts to 30 June 2011 have not be signed off on a going concern basis.”

So there are accounts buried somewhere inside Ibrox, but they are not unqualified – which as the company shortly afterwards entered administration is not a surprise!

Has the fine been paid? Is the fine left in the wreckage of RFC PLC, or will Sevco Scotland Ltd pay it?

There was a leak of what was alleged to be the document sent to Sevco Scotland Ltd detailing what information and documents were needed to allow the transfer of the SFA membership to be effected.

This can be seen here RFC Sevco Membership Doc.

The most interesting requirements are as follows:-

Details of the Shareholding of Sevco Scotland Ltd, including all shareholders and financial backers;

The Business Plan of Sevco for the next five years;

Details of all Working Capital Arrangements;

Confirmation of there  being no involvement by Craig Whyte, and an irrevocable commitment that he have no involvement;

Confirmation of TUPE Arrangements;

Proposals to pay football debts to Rapid Vienna, Hears, Dundee United and others; and

Confirmation that Sevco Scotland will accept SFA sanctions re the Disrepute case, SPL sanctions re EBT’s and any other sanctions for matters not yet come to light.

 

On the basis that the SFA requested all of these details, and as it appears that they were produced by the 29th June deadline, one wonders why they have not also been given to the SFL members? Clyde FC have produced a statement tonight which complains, inter alia, about the lack of information provided to the SFL members in advance of Friday’s vote. Maybe this package of stuff would have helped the SFL clubs?

Conclusion

The frantic efforts of the SFA and SPL to keep “Rangers FC” in the second tier of Scottish football continue. It appears that this is all a plan of Messrs Doncaster and Regan, rather than one hatched with Sevco Rangers.

Clearly it is better financially for Mr Green if his team gets into SFL1. But he has kept quiet as he promised he would do.

The issues that face the SFA are numerous.

First of all, the application to transfer the membership will be determined by the SFA Board, which has complete discretion to approve or reject the application on whatever conditions it thinks fit. (SFA Article 14)

Second, the SFA needs to decide whether to approve Sevco Scotland Ltd for grant of a licence, where the conditions regarding the accounts have not been fulfilled.

Thirdly, the SFA Appellate Tribunal will presumably need to be reconvened to determine if the penalty to be accepted by Sevco Scotland Ltd will be expulsion, suspension or termination.

And this all needs to be done, or at worst the first two elements, in time for the season to start.

Agree3 Disagree0

I cannot beleive what is now happening to our game never mind our team. scottish football seems to be in the middle of a cival war were it looks like truth fairplay are taking aback seat .for the good of the game in this country doncaster and regan have to go . they have told lies to the press and sfl and the fans, my god whats it coming to this started in febuary and here we are inthe middle of july and no further forward. if we are to still have agame worth watching this time next year then scottish football as a whole will have to pull together. it is time to let the sfl get on with whatever it is they decide to do without outside interferance , theirs appears to be the only honest [and I include ranger so called spokesmen ] opinion in this whole sorry mess

Agree5 Disagree0

Totally agree that Regan and Doncaster have overstepped their marks here and should go along with their shoddy self-interested organisations.

Let the SFL run Scottish football, with the SFA as an admin body accountable to it. As for the SPL ...... pfffffffff.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 22:08:04
Dear Mr Green,

If the high heid yins decide it's div 1 on Friday, please will you tell them, ta but no sanctions. If these paragons of sporting virtue say no, as we must be seen to be punished, could you please tell them to shove it and send me my season ticket for div 3?

Thanking you

(the real) BB

Believable17 Unbelievable4

It may well be div 3 with sanctions or nothing who knows whats going to happen

Agree2 Disagree2

Div3 but SFA giving us heavy sanctions for the SFA license is actually correct and fair.
Anything else is a bonus.
Rangers has no sporting merit whatsoever for conning the SPL tournament since 1998.

Agree4 Disagree7

Rangers will walk Div 3 with or without sanctions.

Div 1 however might be harder. But as SPL/SFA want Rangers back in SPL in 2013 there won't be sanctions enough to make promotion impossible.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 21:27:40
Gazza wants to come back and help ally out?? i personally would like to see that happen ok he might not be able to kick much these days but it would give us our smiles back after whats been a terrible time.

Believable6 Unbelievable5

Bringing gazza back will put a smile on our faces ffs get a grip wish thats all it takes to make us happy

Agree4 Disagree3

Yes why not Gazza? You may have heard of Wembly FC, managed by El Tel and having other Gazza-era players on their books.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 20:21:41
THIS IS A REALLY GOOD BIT OF PUTTING IT IN PERSPECTIVE!

Neil Doncaster, SPL Chief Executive, has made it clear to SFL clubs that up to six top flight clubs are at a high risk of going in to administration. This follows the 10-1 vote against Rangers staying in the top flight.

I believe these numbers above, prove two things:-

The SPL chairmen, those who had a backbone and did vote as a director in their position should, did not make a commercial decision. They failed to practically weigh up the cost/benefits of Rangers being out of the SPL and what it would mean for their club. The failure of the SPL/SFA to understand the issues of implications of Rangers not being in the top flight has not helped the SPL chairmen.
The Ltd company went into administration (and technically insolvent, i.e. a bust company) in February, has it really taken the SPL four or five months to get the appropriate advice from financial advisors, lawyers and insolvency experts? The SPL and SFA has simply failed to demonstrate their competency in managing such a large organisation. I feel this is another of the many reasons why those in charge should resign.

The fans that voted on behalf of their clubs (in an outrageous display of passing the buck) are putting their hatred for Rangers above the viability of their own club surviving. I don’t understand why the fans of the SPL clubs would have a fully informed opinion of the financial implications of not playing Rangers three or four times a season, and what possible impacts of future sponsorship for the league as well as a television deal. In the end, these fans voted with their hatred of Rangers.
The blame for this goes to the SPL chairman for putting them in this position of power. They demonstrated their weakness in making big decisions regardless of their own popularity.

Rival fans reading and commentating on this article may be laughing now, but when your club is struggling over the next season or two, you’ve only got yourselves and your respective chairmen to blame. You had the opportunity to support your own club instead of voting irrationally.

We’ll enjoy being in the Third division next season (hopefully!) and watching Scottish football crumble above us. We’ll have no sympathy either.

I WOULD LIKE TO HERE WHO YOU THINK WILL BE FIRST?
ABERDEEN, HIBS, HEARTS?

Believable16 Unbelievable16

Right....

1st off you are basically doing what charlie green is doing...BULLYING people to let you back into the spl,you got a transfer ban & your manager said he wanted to know who was on the pannel & now that person of raith rovers has had everything threw at him..... so bully your way into the spl or let rangers start else where ?

argee on the doncaster etc should all be sacked there like a man down they couldnt run a riot

main reason why rangers arent in the spl is ie hearts go down the tubes do they get to walk back into the spl ? no so same for rangers.....

lenny

Agree10 Disagree7

You demonstrate the attitude that resulted in us being expelled from the SPL. Do not be surprised if the SFL do not want us.

Agree12 Disagree7

How does Green think he can raise commercial sponsorship with morons like this on board.

Agree10 Disagree5

Are you hopefull we will enjoy SFL3 or hopefull we will be in it.

Agree4 Disagree1

The impression you give OP is that not one single fan of any SPL club has a working brain cell and it was all pure "anti-Rangers hatred" from the outset. You cant remotely embrace the possibility that they thought regards say, Livingston or Gretna that "fair's fair" and what they got any club in a similar situation should get.

There is also the possibility that the armageddon theory has been over-played. The notoriously fickle Scottish football going public might find the whole "above corruption" and cleansing of the game to appealing to them and vote with their feet where it counts, in stadiums up and down the country.

Two of Scotland's three main trophies went to non old firm teams last season while (on the park at least) there were still "two big teams". Make no mistake Rangers are not a force right now on the park. Forty other teams in Scottish football are suddenly thinking "there is a big one" out there, automatically that changes your mind set regards European qualification, Scottish Cups and League Cups.

I don't know how it wll work out, neither do you and for all that they are armed with figures galore Doncaster and Regan sure as hell don't know either.

Bear in mind in every single document they have produced they gave a "worst case scenario". We lose the Sky deal, we lose the ESPN deal, so they immediately wipe those figures off, there is no conceivable way there wont be NO DEAL, so they at every turn have failed to reinject into their forecasts another deal, be it BBC, STV, whomever.

And due to it's unique nature and lack of potential for visiting Rangers fans I guarantee there will be some TV deal for whatever division they are in. I don't see any factoring in of that too, all doom and gloom and worst case scenarios from the spineless duo.

Gaz

Agree10 Disagree5

Why doesn't Neil Doncaster post his best case scenario? ie Everything carries on, lower league clubs make a bit of extra cash, and then in 2016 Rangers are back in the SPL challenging for the title?

Agree1 Disagree5

:1 Bullying? all the other club's fans know what bullying is about. Vote no and we will turn up at your ground, vote yes and nobody will turn up.

Agree4 Disagree0

Am telling you! There will be no football played this year or next by the club formally known as Rangers! You need to look at the old song "no 1 likes us we don't care" well guess what! That's exactly true! I think it's time to look for a new team to support! In fact there's a wee team that play in green not to far your old stomping ground!

Agree1 Disagree3

Why dont we all the fans of scottish fitba, stop all the ear bashing an get on its only a game, we all want a team 2 support an try an respect each other we( GERS FANS) cant help what has happened 2 our team i for 1 dont want 2 see our game going down the tubes, just would have likeed spl sfa sfl 2 got together a bit earlier 2 sort the mess we and i mean WE got the game in! we are left now to sfl to do the right thing an i think for good of the game they will so hopefully the gers will be playing sfl football next season and i for 1 will be there.

Agree1 Disagree0

Happy Sheep here. Few points.

1. Stuart E Milne is nae dafty. He is sure we can survive. Who would I put my trust in? Apprentice joiner turned one of Scotlands richest or bitter ex fan of the former Rangers Football Club? Congrats Wiggy, my votes with you!
2. Who allowed contracts to be based on certain clubs remaining in the particular league? Did the SPL clubs have a say? Presumably any future contracts will have this anomally rectified, even if we have to take a small financial hit for it.
3. Surely Doncaster, Regan and Ogilvie should be sacked without further consideration. The manner this whole affair has been handled is embarrassing in the extreme, corruption also springs to mind. You hear it said everyone has a boss, everyone reports to someone. Who is these muppets bosses?
4. McMoist wants Div 3. A mighty percentage of the new clubs fans say Div 3. The rule book says Div 3 if a new club is admitted. FIFA rules suggest, in this situation, newco should start at Div 3. So if the rulers of Scottish football go against all this, and corruptly manage a move to anything other, will Green and Sally, et al, put their collective feet down and insist Div 3?

Happy days

Agree2 Disagree2

@8 Don't think any Rangers fans will be going to your ground any time soon. If Rangers don't get a team for next season the majority of fans will either just give up on football or support an English team. There will be NO CHANCE that they will support the Tic.

DO

Agree5 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 19:51:12
apparently mcgregor has agreed a 3 year deal with besiktas. more rats deserting what they think is a sinking ship. they'll all regret it when the pheonix arises. steviebear

Believable13 Unbelievable11

Yes steviebear, and the sky will turn pink, Govan will gain class and the moon will turn in to a giant maltezer

Agree6 Disagree5

If mcgegor had signed a lucrative 3 year deal with besiktas and was a very wealthy man at the end of it, do you really believe hed wish it all away for whats on offer from sevco ? Premier league delusion.

Agree1 Disagree0

From reports it sounds like he has just climbed aboard a sinking ship. Besiktas denied euro competition for failing to pay taxes and bills etc. Sound familiar to anyone lololol

Agree0 Disagree0

If and when the phoenix rises, it could well take 5,6 or 7 years if we're lucky. Football players can't wait around that length of time hoping things will pick up. Good luck to him and thanks for all the great memories, he will be missed.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 19:51:00
ED039, as one of the more reasonable
people on here, can I ask your opinions
of your fellow RFC fans ( I will call them
that until it is official they are no longer)
All we here on here and other RFC sites
is "we hate all SPL teams" "we hate all
SFL teams who vote against us" it is
all hate, hate, hate. No RFC fan I have
seen or heard, seems to acknowledgs
all this was brought on by YOUR own actions.
Another thing we here in perpetuity is,
Scottish football needs us, I hope
Scottish football dies... No remorse,
just bitterness, over and over again.
Yes the SPL will miss your team and
your fans, Celtic will miss the derby
games..
But it looks like most SPL teams have
seen an upsurge in season ticket sales,
Motherwell have said if they get a
decent euro run they will be solvent
for next 3 years.
Celtic also, if we get to CL group stages
will more than make up what we lose
in derby gates, tv etc..
Also if other SPL clubs challenge and
make it a more exciting league, it
will raise profile of SPL.
So please stop blaming everyone else
and accept your blame that your club
cheated.
You may be surprised that SPL will
manage fine without you for a season
or two and not just survive but THRIVE.
Timalloy {Ed039's Note - all good points, and I for one actually hope rangers come back to a strong league because if that is not the case then what is the point, I think the points you make though are in the long term, but if sponsorship an tv money is impacted in the immediate future then this will impact on clubs and their immediate plans. I for one don't hate other clubs or their supporters, but for example if reported sky do not come across with the 625k payment for August, do you think teams like Motherwell etc will be able to meet their obligations for salaries etc? I have acknowledged time and again that the problems are rangers making and they will impact other clubs, but it has not been acknowledged that financially other Scottish teams have depended on the old firm for years and I do think that there is some financial hardship ahead for many teams as for you not hearing rangers fans acknowledge the shortcomings of the past regime(s) then you need to troll through the site as here have been many, hope you appreciate my honesty)

Believable4 Unbelievable8

Cheers ED039, yes I do appreciate your honesty. Your team's financial input will be missed by everyone but maybe it will make more teams fiscally aware of their own outgoings and cut their cloth accordingly.
Your point about Sky not paying SPL clubs this season, is I think part of the Regan/Doncaster scaremongering. The tv deal is still in place, even without RFC and SKY are contractually obliged to honour it. They may try and probably will, try and reduce amount but must pay something for televising our games.
You have to admit that Regan/Doncaster are bending over backwards to help your club gain entry to SFL1, yes I know argument is we all need your money, but sporting integrity must come first.
But even if vote gets you back into SFL1, you only have a bare squad and only 3 weeks to prepare, you will be hard pushed to be ready in time. Then there is small matter of any other penalties that could come your way.
In the long run, it may even be better for you to go down to SFL3, regroup, rebuild, all debts paid so to speak and come back a cleaner, and hopefully a better more honestly run club with the true fans in more control. Timalloy {Ed039's Note - I don't think they are bending over backwards for rangers, I think they are bending over backwards to ensure their salaries are safeguarded although regan should go, with penalties, why should a newco suffer consequences of a former incarnation? Everybody is quick to remind why have no history and that it is a fresh company so why should these follow over, especially if rangers are in SFL3, but I do agree wit you and think that rangers would struggle to be ready for the start of the new season if in sfl1, maybe to with stating 11 quality but with match fitness/sharpness and mentally he guys there must still be crushed)

Agree3 Disagree2

We do accept blame for the mess the club created. But there are those posters on here, who would like to blame us for Global warming/World famine etc as well , if they could only find a reason to justify it. The fans of Rangers did not create this mess, WE apologise on behalf of the mess Murray/Whyte created. Maybe just maybe if some people cut our fans a bit of slack, we might all become civilised towards each other. I hold my breath in hope!

Agree5 Disagree1

I take issue with your assertion that clubs have depended upon the OF. Start with the basic that it takes 2 teams to have a football match. The paying public pay to watch 2 teams not 1.
A match at Ibrox/Parkhead attracts 45/50000 and generates revenue of around £1m.
The average OF away support is not much more than 10% of the home attendance and giving the other team extra revenue after VAT and additional policing costs of £100,000.
The smaller clubs are at a huge disadvantage from the start and this financial model has added an additional handicap and has resulted in a complete lack of competition.
An analogy would be giving the best horse the lightest weight,the best draw and best jockey.The result would be a far gone conclusion.
I am a season ticket holder and have not been to an away game in 10 years and and like most Rangers supporters have made no financial contribution to other clubs. A fairer distribution would enhance competition and make matches far more entertaining. Too many people are obssessed with Celtic and cannot see the bigger picture.
Scottish football is at a crossroads and another wrong turn could be fatal.

Agree7 Disagree2

Celtic fan here. For one time only, Scottish fan opinion is united in a single voice. If there's once thing this whole saga has achieved, it has been that supporters like me actually feel sorry for the average (true) Rangers fan. There might be a large degree of Schadenfreude at play. It's only natural to use this as an excuse to laugh at your expense. As you would if the tables were turned. But at the end of the day we all recognise that the custodians of Rangers totally shafted their own supporters - and that just isn't right.

Agree8 Disagree0

You make a fair point in your post to a degree Sir.
But where your argument falls down is via the money that is drip fed down through sponsorship,advertising,TV and media etc.
The initial interest is predominantly focused on the old firm,and the others merely feed off this.
The old firm rivalry,the greatest derby in the world,and the potential marketing exploitation of both club's fanbases is all that holds the attraction. Your argument about all clubs downsizing and cutting their cloth,is nothing but propaganda. Everyone knows Celtic are in a strong position and will walk the title race for a few years. The other clubs are already miles behind,look at the league table last season,Motherwell had an exceptional campaign,but how far did they finish behind us,despite the ten point deduction? If everyone has to tighten their belts,then Celtic will only prosper,but that's all your interested in right? The "Holy Grail" being 54/55!
P.O.B.

Agree1 Disagree0

I like your "IF" motherwell,celtic etc etc ! hehe

Agree1 Disagree0

Firstly, to OP and ed, great debate in an honest and civilised manner, something I, as an Aberdeen fan, appreciate this site for in the main. Being able to see the wood from the trees so to speak. Well done and, just hopefully, if any good can come from this sorry mess, it will be a new era of sporting rivalry as opposed to insane hatred. Every club has, and will retain its moronic element, but hopefully shameful pasts can start to be forgotten.
To 2. the reason the newco must share some pain is very simple. There has to be a deterrent. Without that what would stop the vicious circle of corruption and mismanagement, administration, liquidation, newco with no sanctions, corruption with financial mismanagement, admin...... I'm sure you see where I'm coming from without needing to continue. What's more, Newco starting in Div 3 is NOT a punishment, it's a fair application of the rules that would automatically apply to any other new club applying to join the senior set up.

Agree3 Disagree1

@7. Post 2 here, don't disagree with your post, only that the fans were not to blame for this debacle and maybe some finger pointing in the right direction might be better served. Newco starting in Div3 is i agree not a punishment, it's a practical and valid route back to the top and one that must be made otherwise the back biting will never cease.

Agree3 Disagree1

First time poster from OZ here. I cancelled my Setanta package last week as no more rangers games to watch. got talking to the person cancelling my subscription and he asked why i was cancelling. When I told him he told me that their lines have been jammed with rangers supporters also doing the same. he also said he had had over 12 cancellations that morning from Celtic supporters who told him they only subscribed because of the old firm games. In Oz we have mellowed a little and you do not get the bigoted side of things you get in Scotland. I will always be a Ger in my heart, but unfortunately Scottish football is stuffed according to most ex pats over hear and most have said they will no longer watch Scottish games and will switch to Rugby league. I believe this will be happening in many other countries of the world as i type this text. Best of luck to all the totally blameless rangers who have suffered and are being punished which was not of their making but those of three irresponsible men who have dragged the impeccable reputation of the most successful and admired football club in the world to the depths of destruction. Just like to add that the general feeling amongst genuine football supporters over here is that Rangers are only receiving this slaughter because they are who they are and the excuse being used sporting integrity is only a sham to cover the hatred being shown by other clubs with little intelligence and insane revenge as their main motive. Keep the chins up lads. I am a Ferguson and my clan crest is a bee on a thistle and the motto "Dulcius-Ex-Asperis" which means "Sweeter Through Difficulty. Good luck to all the Teds.

Ozzie Al

Agree3 Disagree1

@8, the only thing the fans are guilty of is delusion, denial and a wish to see the other clubs fail as a result of what happened to them. No true Rangers fan is guilty of the route the club took, the corruption and cheating. That, in my opinion, lies at the feet of Murray and Whyte, along with others who backed and supported them at a high level.
The size and importance of the former Rangers, in my opinion, has actually helped them. If it was any other team, with the exception of Celtic, there would be no debate over league for entry of the Newco, as there simply would be no Newco. I don't think any other teams would have survived wrong doing and corruption of this gravity.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 19:47:02
Heard that the 3 supporters associations
are going to unite in demanding we are
put in 3rd Div. If not then no season
tickets will be bought and no travelling
support to go anywhere to financially
support anyone. Therefore if put in
1st Div, no guarantees that the team
will get out of it at first attempt and
scupper everyone elses financial
dependence on us. WE MUST GO TO
THE 3rd !!!! This will unite the
support like nothing else. {Ed039's Note - These people do not speak for the majority of fans, especially Dingwall, but I personally would prefer SPL 3)

Believable10 Unbelievable1

All supporters of football in the country should unite if the SFA get away with what they are attempting. Boycott all games untill it is sorted.

Agree4 Disagree1

All the threats to not not buy season tickets are just stupid as its only hurts the club

J

Agree0 Disagree2

I wish all the fans who say they wont go 2 away games an wont buy season tickets dont! we might not have a league 2 play in, so we should let sfl decide an just be grateful if get in because this has gone on to long and has got to nasty an bitter on all sides so either support the gers or dont ,i will still be a ger with no condition to what league we play in!

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 19:43:27
"Its funny how all the players that left suddenly became rubbish". Probably a reply to my post above about a "reality check" etc. Personally I thought he was a half decent consistant goalkeeper who was capable of the odd piece of brilliance but it shows that SPL form or even a couple of half decent european games (for SPL clubs means nothing). People don't care about Scottish football and that's only going to get worse. It's a reality check because most people including him probably thought he would be in top half EPL but he's hardly been all over the papers with transfer talk. It's not a reality check because he's a rubbish player.

Believable5 Unbelievable2

I read McGregor being described as "average" only today by a Rangers fan. I'm a Celtic fan and have absolutely no time for Mark Viduka but I cannot say he wasn't a good player. A rewriting of history is going on regards the talent of some Rangers players and it is utter nonsense.

Gaz

Agree8 Disagree1

10 Jul 2012 19:41:39
whats the situation with the ibrox catering if craig whyte mortgaged it out so to speak

Believable2 Unbelievable0

Killie have offered to supply the pies,will be beat the football.

Agree2 Disagree0

Lets not go there. That is one big can of worms.

Agree1 Disagree1

We get all revenue streams back with the club

Agree0 Disagree1

10 Jul 2012 18:51:30
can someone clear up the following ongoing points.
Does a club need three years accounts to apply to the sfl or not?
Did audi withdraw the players cars?
What ever happened to the legal acions that were going to be taken against the bbc in the recent expose?
Thanks

Believable3 Unbelievable0

1) yes think its in todays or yesterdays sun or DR

2)yes as newco dont have a argeement with audi

3) same as 1st time round say they will when really they wont

lenny

Agree5 Disagree0

1) The Scottish football authorities make up and ignore rules as they go along so who knows? Hopefully when this fiasco ends both Regan and Doncaster are out of a job.

2) I believe so.

3) The same thing that happened after Craig Whyte threatened to sue BBC Scotland i.e Don't Hold Your Breath.

BB

Agree4 Disagree0

Yes,yes and nothing.it is not illegal to tell the truth(yet) !! dd

Agree2 Disagree0

The BBC have yet to receive any notice of court action from the allegedly "defamed" parties. tells it's own story, eh ?

Agree6 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 18:48:46
what a laugh i had when i read in the paper that gazza was wanting to pull on the rangers top again . please please do paul .......a carryoot for half time and another for full time no bad wages for div 3

Believable4 Unbelievable2

10 Jul 2012 18:32:21
Green must NOT accept sanctions in terms of Div 1 if he does i want renew my season ticket ...mr myle

Believable8 Unbelievable5

10 Jul 2012 17:31:57
Remember the old Rangers haven't officially went into liquidation yet. This could hold up the players contracts saga.

I think there are more twists and turns to be taken on this.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

So why did green transfer say he has transfered players to newco

Agree0 Disagree0

But hasnt green 'offered them a contract to the newco' & if they say no they become free agents ?

good point tho !

lenny

Agree2 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 15:03:02
ed can you tell me why my post regarding the three year audited accounts was not posted as this was a fact not fiction. is maybe because you had got the decision wrong and did not want to look silly. I posted it twice and you never posted so why was this.

hail hail

Marco1888

ps I suspect this won't get posted as there won't be an answer. {Ed039's Note - It was because I haven't had a chance to reply and because it was a question for me, it was left for me, you not got any transfer rumours to keep you busy on another site? You seem to post quite a lot on a site for fans of a team that doesn't exist as you keep telling us)

Believable13 Unbelievable2

Hey Ed the number of times Mraco 1888 has been on here he has got to be the Newco's biggest fan.
Bought your season ticket yet marco?

Agree8 Disagree0

If it's 3 yrs audited accounts for the SFL, don't bother, that rule applies for a brand new team not a membership being transferred from an oldco to a newco, as is the case here.

Agree4 Disagree2

This guy is a t**t ed just ignore the soap dodger

Agree8 Disagree7

Yes I post a lot on here and the reason I do so is to try and keep everyone informed of what's happening because a lot of the oldco fans seem to think the newco is the same club. which we both know is not the case. also these fans seem to think oldco/newco have been punished enough. but could you clarify what punishment these club(s) have actually had apart from a transfer embargo which was overturned and a crappy 160,000 fine which we both know will not be paid. so no punishments eh ed.

hail hail

Marco1888 {Ed039's Note - When did I say there was no punishments, everybody is entitled to an opinion but you just seem to to think you are a know it all which I can assure you are not and you are wasting my time)

Agree6 Disagree3

Ed, read on the net that both uefa and FIFA have articles that allow a club to be fast tracked to a higher league. Fifas article 9.2 although primarily relates to sporting merit, does go on to state that financial reasons can also be considered. Sadly people like marco will never understand this and will repeatedly spout the so called 3 year rule. Maybe marco should be asking on his own teams website as to wether their team endorsed this , he won't like the answer.

Agree1 Disagree3

This Marco1888 was nowhere near this site when rangers won 3 in a row, another of the gloryhunter brigade

Agree4 Disagree1

Hey marco its not your day is it .your getting shot down in flames for your incorrect posts ,being a gers fan ive always considered celtic as being celtic ,even although their official name has been changed ,how many times ? come on marco, or shall i call you bamber ,fill the other posters in with your vast knowledge doug t.s.o

Agree4 Disagree5

@4 Another one who wants to remind us that the newco is not connected to oldco historically but continues to state that newco should be punished despite of this. Obviously he is a bit dense in the head to understand why these things contradict each other.

DO

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 14:59:54
hi fellow bears again we go on this debacle with charles green digging his heels in trying to claw in some fees for the players that left
and not allowing them to continue their football careers away from rangers surely these guys have been through enough let them get on with their new clubs and give them time to settle in to their new surroundings and get on with playing football again enough is enough put us into div 3 and everyone can move on from this nightmare
and we start playing football again and take our punishment on the chin then start building for the future so lets get on with it everyday day is another day wasted for the future of our club Mr Green your rubbing peoples noses out of joint
greigstar

Believable10 Unbelievable8

10 Jul 2012 13:27:02
As a gers fan like so many would be happy to start div three so we can build our self respect back nd do what is right for scotland nd fifa has made the right choice allowing sfa to make the choice the players broke a contract wit a new company but a contract

Believable1 Unbelievable9

As a fellow bear i am getting sick an tired of this hole debacle,as a football club we broke the rules we have been punished we have lost almost half our squad which was thread bare at best already,we are in the process of being liquidated with no hope now of revival,our reputation has been tore to pieces and sadly the outside world will only ever remember us for the crimes our previous owners and NOT fans commited which we have exausted now.so yes we do need to be punished but the wonderfull governing body called the sfa are a sham and laughable no one willing to show some b******s and make a decision,sporting integrity a keep hearing this phrase and you have to wonder what is sporting integrity?lets see mr doncaster,well try and get you into 1st div and not the 3rd which to be honest is my preffered choice why?my guess money,its well documented tv deals sponsership money,etc etc,so basically we are to be sanctioned with possible transfer embargo,points deduction,threadbare squad but they still want us in div1 in the hope id imagine they want us back in spl within 1 year 2 at most.this hole thing stinks to high heavens.do the right thing and ask for admittance to div3.sporting integrity would suggest why should be allowed straight into div1 when teams in div 2 an 3 have been battling for promotin to this league for years. The rule book in the sfa corridors are a page thick and get added to on a daily basis.so i say if sfa cant sort this and fast get a higher power fifa or uefa if need be and sort this mess out and lets get on with supporting football again and not watching our game fade away into the abis forever. {Ed039's Note -

Agree6 Disagree1

10 Jul 2012 13:15:32
It is my sincere wish that when the club gets back to the top flight and wins the SPL (and we will) that whoever the captain is on that day, leads the team out onto the field and right past the SPL lackies and their trophy and do their lap of honour! We want your title but we don't want your silver...Glasgow Rangers will be back!

Believable16 Unbelievable18

10 Jul 2012 12:42:49
Such a feckin mess - I can see a one year suspension coming!

Believable15 Unbelievable2

Someone at last is talking sense. one year suspension will happen

Agree6 Disagree2

I have been expecting a 1 year suspension for months now. The SFA/SFL/SPL have been dragging their collective heels to ensure that no time is left to sort out this mess by the start of the season. Therfore GERS will not be in any league and a 1 year suspension can will be applied

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 12:23:19
Former Dundee director Giovanni Di Stefano plans on buying the 'old' Rangers and moving them to England. (The Sun)

Now this is one guy i do not want to see around ibrox. One dodgy character, says he wants the sheikh of Qatar to buy Gers and send us to England.

Believable14 Unbelievable1

What is about us that attracts people like this? For any bears that don't know this is a convicted fraudster who once promised to put Dundee in the Champions League. Do a bit of research into this man. I guarantee you will not be impressed! BB

Agree4 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 12:20:26
Rangers legend Paul Gascoigne has offered to play for the Ibrox club next season if manager Ally McCoist calls on him.
Full Story: The Sun

I know Gazza is a legend and all but i think this is the last thing he needs. I would love to have him back at Ibrox but not as a player, poor guy has too many problems.

Doz

Believable12 Unbelievable2

Be brills though, in a time of legends, a team consisting of future legends supported by current legends running out every week and doing the business in the legendary 3rd division, led out of course by player/manager ally 'the end of the leg' McCoist.

Well I'd watch it.

Agree0 Disagree1

Gazza said some great heartfelt things about Rangers in that article but I honestly wish the Sun would stop harrassing the guy in order to get news stories, we all know he is in a fragile state of health. BB

Agree2 Disagree1

A disgrace what they put in these daily rags.. just for shock value, it's what causes the uproar between all teams.. bless Gazza, i hope he is doing well..

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 11:54:03
Tomorrow is the revised season ticket deadline. Who will be paying there money for next season with all of this doubt surrounding the club?

Agree (Paying for Season Ticket Now)

Disagree (Not Paying for Season Ticket until clarity on league, team and Green's backer/plans provided).

Believable4 Unbelievable21

Season ticket renewals have been suspended for several days and will not be re-opened until Rangers know what league they will be in. If you don't believe me call the ticket hotline

Agree3 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 11:45:29
Front page of the Sun? What a joke. Honesltly Bears, and I mean this sincerely, you guys have got to start standing your ground and stop idiots like these even getting within a sniff of anything to do with your club.

Believable8 Unbelievable1

The idiots are the people who pay money!! to read the Sun.

Agree5 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 11:43:53
First game of the season at last!

Saturday, July 21: Sevco Scotland v Albion Rovers

*To be played at Murray Park. Kick-off: 11am. Closed-doors match

Believable6 Unbelievable5

10 Jul 2012 11:42:58
Time to boycott subbuteo

Believable10 Unbelievable3

10 Jul 2012 11:15:29
Gazza is reported as saying he wants to come back and play for newco. Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse!

Believable5 Unbelievable2

10 Jul 2012 10:56:33
Celtic fan here. I hope the players
who have gone to other clubs get
international clearance only after
Rangers get some sort of compensation
for them. GH

Believable19 Unbelievable10

10 Jul 2012 10:19:14
now the spl turkeys have voted for xmas hope they sink one by one revenge will be sweet and we will come back stronger than ever. we should boycott every spl ground except kilmarnock on spl return youth is the way forward mixed with some good experienced 'loyal' players

Believable9 Unbelievable15

I cannot believe ur ignorance! The SPL teams r just sick off ur team cheating ur way to titles! All other clubs r trying to live within there means in tough economic times while ur's were taking money off players but not paying ur taxes or ur bills! Everyone just wants a level playing field! Is that too much to ask?

Byars {Ed039's Note - How many teams have lived within their means)

Agree8 Disagree7

Yeah ed agree most other clubs have hemeraging debts but they have to cut there cloth accordingly! They all still pay there taxes, football debts and other debts! All this bullsh*t boycott all other grounds apart from Kilmarnock is nonsense!

Byars

Agree4 Disagree1

10 Jul 2012 09:30:43
Can someone tell me if the history of rangers fc will be moved over to the newco?

Believable14 Unbelievable17

10 Jul 2012 08:22:06
OK I tend to follow the darker side. That said, there has to be some logical common sense applied here. Sadly the main culprits in this mess will probably not be punished. RFC as it was is now gone and this newco is replacing it. There is punishment for qrongdoing but I see a lot of "revenge" feeling around. The Players, fans and support groups did not knowingly break the rules (yes, they all enjoyed what appeared to be legitimate success). Like it or not Rangers/Newco, whatever is a major player and the revenue generated by them is needed to sustain SCOTTISH football (not just SPL). The rejection by the SPL was probably justified but in the cold light of day, the Newco should go to Div 1 (with possibly some form of points reductions etc.), It may be that Green will have to accept certain punishments from HMRC but that has still to be decided. The SFA, SPL and to some extent the SFL are not entirely blameless and have been accepting the "succulent lamb" generated over the years. CW, by retaining PAYE etc has broken the law and he should be punished as an individual. But it is time to draw a line and stop the bloodletting and get back to playing football and keeping Scottish football alive.

Believable7 Unbelievable6

Were not gone yet. Theres a plan to keep Old Co alive and head for England. Wait an see. {Ed039's Note - What a load of old tosh)

Agree4 Disagree3

..Sorry mate but HMRC cant touch Charles Green..all that nonesense will go with the oldco...Rangers biggest enemy is Stewart Regan if Rangers dont go into the first division he will try to kill the club by stopping entry into the sfl...

Agree7 Disagree1

What do you mean " you tend to follow the darker side " .........DH

Agree0 Disagree1

3.) Just pointing out what both sides of Glasgow say (lightheartedly) The dark side is the opposite side of the city.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 04:52:29
I for one hope Rangers never deal with Everton again after ripping us off for Jelavic , to come back and do the same again with naisy really does my head in, I would of thought these all mighty premiership clubs would of at least had the decency to pay some form of compensation ! Or allowed loan signings to arrive as part of the deals !

Believable13 Unbelievable24

Are u mental we ave done it for years with the lesser teams in scotland get a lifeI

Agree9 Disagree3

Really? You might have thought you might have paid your transfer debt before whining about this.How many teams do you owe now?

Agree8 Disagree2

Rip off? How much was it Rangers owed Everton at that point in time?

Agree7 Disagree2

How did they rip you off?....sound more like why you can t profit from buying a car on HP and flogging it the next day and not repaying the original finance.

Agree5 Disagree2

How can ranger,s deal with everton again,how did they rip you off ?garlar07

Agree5 Disagree3

WHAT? WHAT? is this the same Jelavic that old rangers NEVER paid for?....ex bears think before you post.. Timalloy

Agree8 Disagree4

In fairness there is heavy rumours that Rangers still owed up to a million to Everton for Michael Ball

Agree8 Disagree4

Why should we pay money for somthing that Rangers didnt own, there is no one to blame apart from the former ower/board, Naisy was a free agent we seen the oppertunity and took it

None of this is Everton's fault, I do feel sorry for you guys but if your club was run better you wouldnt be in this situation

Micky Blue

Agree8 Disagree2

Think you will find no one will ever be doing deals with Rangers as Rangers are no more gone dead buried extinct.

Ian {Ed039's Note - Boooooooooooring, change the tune)

Agree9 Disagree4

I for one hope hearts, rapid vienna,celtic and dundee utd never deal with newco again as they are all owed money. shamrock {Ed039's Note - Newco again? As we are constantly reminded, newco has no history blah blah blah, so how can they do business "again")

Agree4 Disagree4

"Ripping us off for Jelavic"? Was he not for sale to any club prepared to do the deal? Tend to agree about Naismith and the others - if things had been handled properly there would have been decent transfer fees in the pot for creditors.

Agree1 Disagree3

Blame Craig Whyte for Jelavic don't blame Everton. If Whyte had been a competent and more honest businessman Jelavic would have been sold to West Ham for a higher price but Whyte wanted the maximum cash ASAP so went for a lesser bid with more dosh upfront.

Anyway I suspect you are a Celtic man making a comment so other Celtic fans can drone on about how we ripped off Rapid Vienna in the first place for Jelavic. BB

Agree3 Disagree2

Uve gotta b havin a laugh mate, everton ripped rangers off?! Rangers never even paid rapid in full and still made a profit on his sale! Unbelievable! L1888

Agree5 Disagree1

What goes around. Rememeber the time when your club used a loophole to get Zurab Khisinvilli (spelling) from Dundee rtather than pay even £25k.
Karma son, Karma!

Agree6 Disagree2

Oh my god,everton never ripped you off they never reported you to FIFA because of the close ties of clubs,rangers were heavy in debt and owed everton monies from various deals everton had gentlemans agreement over these debts which the rangers board honoured when they could have taken higher bid from west ham,everton hardly parted with a penny,as for Naismith what's the problem we're do you think he would rather be...evertons 1st game man utd at Goodison sold out...rangers maybe 3rd division side watched by a dozen people and a dog

Agree3 Disagree1

Come on mate we owe everyone, Rapid Vienna, Hearts, even Celtic £70k.....on tickets we sold and never paid up......
I thought the RFFF was to pay these debts..... Now Green has the club there's no need for a fighting fund.

Agree4 Disagree1

Talking about ripping off clubs,have rangers paid rapid vienna the full amount for jelavic?what about the cash for wallace,goian etc?silly me thats the old rangers unpaid debts,sorry.

Agree3 Disagree1

The irony is lost on you isn't it........rapid vienna owed money for jelavic

Agree4 Disagree1

Would this be the same thing you did to killie regarding boyd and naismith

hail hail

Marco1888

Agree4 Disagree2

14) would that be the same loophole Dundee used to get him in the first place or was it a different one?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2012 00:19:00
Not a rumour by thought is give a big shout to Andy Murray. Well done son. Thought I could do that on here seeing as he was almost a bear but chose tennis instead!

Believable15 Unbelievable18

Born/playing at the wrong time . throughout the nineties he might have won a biggie but against federer and nadal and now jorcavic , i dont think he ever will. but he is still quite young fingers crossed.. shamrock

Agree1 Disagree1

What b****cks you speak..... Andy Murray was never on the books of any spl or sfl school boy signings or teams..... From a very early age, AM was on the training programme for UK young tennis future stars, spending most of his youth training at the acedemy in Spain.

Agree5 Disagree1

@2, before making comments like that I suggest checking your facts. Andy Murray had a trial with Rangers as a youngster and they were going to offer him a deal but he chose to pursue tennis instead. He moved to Spain when he was 15.

Agree0 Disagree0

@3, I have my facts straight, Andy was invited to train at Rangers youth school, asare several hundred kids every year, he never signed s form or played for your youth team or any other youth side, he never received any support from the old Rangers, never got any sponsorship or assistance.

The reason why, he was advised by some very knowledgable people that he did not have the ability to make it as a pro footballer, and chose to follow that advise into the tennis training programme,

So stop trying to say that AM was a star that slipped through your net.... He wsn't and probably would not thank you for trying to associate him with all the crap at Ibrox..... He would want no association with Rangers at any level.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think you will find he was only invited to train at Rangers school of excellance, and was advised not to go into football.

Andy is actually a lifelong Hibs fan, as his granddad played for them in the sixties. He has no actual relationship with Rangers or Celtc in any way. {Ed039's Note - It doesn't really matter guys, he is the 4th best tennis player in the world, it is jut unfortunate he is in an era where there are the 3 players above him all playing at the same time, whatever he did or didn't do s a youngster I think it I safe to say he made the correct career choice)

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2012 22:45:01
Heard from close friend of Green that Fifa are going to rule on the rebel players, he is going to take them to court, to try to stop this, more penalties now for taking on Fifa, what next, the circus goes on and on.

Believable14 Unbelievable5

Rubbish, Green will go to Court of Arbitration for Sport which is correct process and within the rules for appealing.

Agree2 Disagree0

Are ranger,s and newco the same team if they are history and debt remain,newco no history,no debt,no punishment.which is it,garlar07

Agree1 Disagree2

09 Jul 2012 21:34:44
Just an idea what do the fans think? When rangers bring out the new away strip why dont they have the players names of all players and super ally printed into strip? These guys like mcculloch and wallace are legends in my eyes and it would be nice to show them respect? Sure a few years ago man utd had a strip with previous players names.

Believable7 Unbelievable23

Maybe they should have our names on it as were the ones that should be showed respect. instead of the hell we have been put through

Agree6 Disagree3

Rangers also had a strip like this aswell as i owned it...

Tam-Sir 1873 it was about 10 years ago though and not the main strip...can anyone remember..

Agree2 Disagree2

Great, running around with all the EBT names on show!

Agree4 Disagree1

Wallace only there because if he leaves he needs to go back hearts

Agree0 Disagree2

Mcculloch and wallace are present day not previous players ?? shamrock

Agree0 Disagree0

How can rangers bring out a new strip..Theydont exist ..ffs ...col

Agree4 Disagree4

Yes...Vaguely. I think it was NTL who were the sponsors at the time??
p.o.b.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2012 21:07:45
If SFL vote us into div one then that is their decision, not ours. If sporting integrity is not seen to be done then the SFL clubs will be guilty of this, not us.
Why, why do you still want div three. It is beyond belief.

If it was our decision which league to go into and chose div one the I can understand the sporting integrity chestnut
being used, but it is not our decision, it is SFL clubs
decision.

Can we please stop demanding div three, it would be awful.

Believable6 Unbelievable22

I know it would be aweful for a while, but I think most of us want Div3 because that is the best we can within the actual rules. I don't these other clubs trying to do us favours. It just means that all the supporters will just tell us that we got special breaks. Sure their clubs voted for it but it still doesn't change the fact that we got special treatment.

I just want any favours from these guys, I want Rangers to be able to climb back up to the top by ourself without any help.

Agree2 Disagree0

SFL clubs are not being given a "free and fair" election on this as there is a huge carrot and a huge stick being waved by Regan.

If the SPL and SFA want to manoeuvre Rangers into SFL1 then the SPL needs to be dissolved and all members apply to SFL which should then restructure (should it choose to).

Agree0 Disagree0

Remember it would be D1 with sanctions attached.

Agree0 Disagree0

And Division 1 with a squad of 10-13 with a stack of penalties would be any better. Both routes would likely mean we would be in Division 2, the season after next. I for one would rather be in Div. 2 after winning the 3rd, than having been relegated due to a mountain of penalties from Div. 1.

Agree0 Disagree0

Once again the answer is Money! with sky's contract up for renewal next season the spl want rangers back in the top league without us they will get a very reduced fee! thats why the gers fans want to make sure that all these clubs who have shown total hatred for our club pay their price, Follow Follow!!

Agree0 Disagree1

Agreed it is the sfl's decision now! we have said were more than happy to go to division 3 so integrity cannot come into it, although I do wonder how much of it is just smoke screens when everyone and the club say's they want 3rd division, is there some info been leaked on the probabilty of us going into the 1st? I for one hope it's the 1st, relegation, 10 point deduction, 160,000 fine, no runners up cash, loss of all our players, 3 year european ban, possible transfer embargo, admin followed by liquidation, what further punishment can be given to us we have already had to many! *ksd*

Agree1 Disagree0

@3 yes, that's the appeal of SFL3. The honest way forward and let the football do the talking.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2012 21:03:04
Let's be honest here the newco isn't the rangers we knew of its a sad sodden state of a club who have shamed Scotland I'm ashamed of what's happened and I don't think we have heard the last of the troubles!we still have the dual contract issues to come,we will get taken to court for selling assets to cheap wich will open a can of worms for fck knows how long!iv had enough il be at fir hill nxt season

Believable17 Unbelievable13

Agreed but I'm absolutely sick about it.
VHSS

Agree2 Disagree0

If you are going to change clubs then at least choose Kilmarnock, since they were the only club to abstain from voting and thus not get caught up in any of this debacle.

DO

Agree0 Disagree3

You can support anyone you like but do us all a favour then, dont come crawling back when we get on our feet again, who needs the anti rangers mob when we have supporters like you

JG

Agree1 Disagree1

Killie's indecision doesn't mean much. Rangers are like a ball being kicked around the field at the moment. Regan is aiming for SFL1's goal with his team of SPL clubs. SFL are defending it as best they can. The ball (Rangers) doesn't have a say in the matter.

(Am I sounding like Chic Young here?)

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2012 20:38:34
so the powers that be want to parachute us into div1. for the sake of the game in scotland aye right BS. they are thinking no further than their own cushy jobs. if we accept sanctions to play in div1 it amounts to nothing more than a bribe from SFA,SPL. WHAT HAPPENED TO SPORTING INTEGRITY?

Believable13 Unbelievable2

09 Jul 2012 20:09:48
where is k. bartley

Believable4 Unbelievable2

OP - Ball boy at Wimbledon - will be back for training soon.

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2012 19:57:48
cmon people get real who cares about away strip or 3rd strip stars etc the crest will be the same and the jersey will still be royal blue thats good enough for me. and buy the way lets not be stupid and go out buying the new strips. this guy green has got the engine running in the getaway car. dont give him a penny.

Believable8 Unbelievable9

09 Jul 2012 19:53:41
New season starts tomorrow first qualifyinf round of the Champios League. Will we be ready to play in the Ramsden's cup 2 weeks on Saturday?

Believable5 Unbelievable3

Dear Hector fan, you are very slow today, first legs were played last week, try to keep up, and yes you can look forward to playing in the newly named Fish & Chip Challange Cup...... Who knows you might even win it..... your first cup as a newco..... how wonderful.
timmie Goa.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Jul 2012 19:49:17
got to laugh at all this send us to div1 with sanctions, for the sake of sporting integrity. sporting integrity my@rse. every club in spl apart from mhanks that voted us out did it for their own personal gain. my reasoning behind this? without us in league the majority will fancy their chances of finishing in second place, or maybe even making europa league spot. they want sanctions against us to make it as difficult as possible to get back to spl. every one of them are only thinking about money they can make if we not there. and why have the mhanks kept quiet? because they know we will be back and they will need our support fighting off the rest.

Believable10 Unbelievable7

Remarkable. Last week Scottish football needed you to survive. Now they've voted no to make money. Stop thinking so much, leave it to us 'mhanks', you'll give yourself a headache.

IPLWT

GoldCoastBhoy

Agree2 Disagree2

The mhanks? When did the Isle of Man get involved in all this then ?

Agree2 Disagree2

3 legs. It's all Rangers have on the park at the moment.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2012 19:00:24
Not a rumour more of an observation I am a Celtic supporter but do you not think that there is not one of the mob up at hampden that you could trust to make a straight forward ruling they all trying there best to side shift any problems or rulings onto other people rather than saying this is what's happening end off mean time still filling there pockets with big wage packets money Scottish football could well do with time to get rid of them all and be run as one body with rules and regulations set in stone for any other problems think we all bored with them fudging there responsibilities rant over Gary p

Believable24 Unbelievable0

Regan has gone to far and should go completely.

Agree3 Disagree1

I agree with you 100% big guy. See the next time you have a rant, goni throw in a full stop or two? im aw oot of breath man ;)

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent