Rangers Banter Archive April 11 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


11 Apr 2013 20:40:50
Re a post further down by Tam, does anyone know the rumour that's doing the rounds that Jim Delahunt mentioned on SSB, they also mentioned it was p*sh. PB

Believable7 Unbelievable8

C. v. a but apparently things are not that bad!

Agree2 Disagree10

Nope. Enlighten us please? GTM

Agree11 Disagree0

OP how can it be p. h if you don't know what it is? You haven't stated what the rumours is but obviously anything that is said against your club you feel that way! Head out of the sand please!

Agree8 Disagree7

@3 I asked the question because I don't know, jim delahunt was the one that stated it was not true. So take your head out your a**e and try reading the original post correctly. PB

Agree13 Disagree9

11 Apr 2013 22:57:29
Was it not a text/email/ message being passed about about press conference at 3pm announcing admin and blue knights buying? Was a load of crap obviously.

Agree4 Disagree2

OP your right it was mentioned on clyde 1. But Jim D said no way was he going to tell, and he did recon it was pure rubbish. that's rumours for you!

Agree0 Disagree2

One thing I have noticed people are dumping the shares 13000 so far today.

Agree3 Disagree0

7:) that £500 minimum buy-in now worth £471. 45 + selling fee and dropping.

Agree1 Disagree0

PB don't look like pish now
Tam

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 20:16:47
dear all celtic fans

GLASGOW RANGERS 1872

are the same club and always will be we were given the footballing debts of the old company and the football club was given entry into the sfl3, the only thing that doesn't exist is the company that ran rangers, if so celtic changed companys after they won the european cup, so either we are a new club and your old company won the european cup and not the celtic we see today, or both are the same FOOTBALL club as started in 1872 and 1888? can't have it both ways,


HAMILTON LAD

Believable18 Unbelievable41

SFA comfirmed to ECA that we are the same club tom english even seen the emails he said so on radio scotland
trueblue

Agree10 Disagree33

Dear all Rangers fans

Keeping your club in this form, that form or any form might require you getting off your ass and actively doing something about Green/McCoist/Both instead of sitting on your computers thinking "ha this will show them!"

Keep spending your energies on this trivial nonsense and you might not have it "any ways".

Agree25 Disagree2

Show me visual proof it's the 'same' club?

Green can't show a agreement between the SFA/ufea/D&P/Craig whyte/bdo etc to prove its the same club or the history stands

Bill miller was your man but he was chased out of town he was the right man for the job

Think of it like this: tesco could change there name tomorrow to tesco plc or tesco whatever.

Rangers (old) vs rangers (new)

Charles tried to save old club with a CVA which is a debt management scheme, creditors didn't want this hence the admin etc

If & this is where the silly bears are getting mixed up, if CG formed the rangers FC before the administration started so effectively creating 2 rangers not a Rangers 5088 then put the old rangers into admin then you have a case to answer for.

CG has changed the rangers to the rangers international FC, he can do that as many times as he like as this business/company/club IS STILL A RUNNING BUSINESS not a business that's gone into admin because its running up debt

The rangers international FC are a new club no history no nothing other than winning a division 3 title, until solid proof that can be seen for the world to see by the right people in power then old co & there history died long ago

It's really not rocket

Lenny

Agree25 Disagree8

The fact your on trying to defend that it's still the same club insinuates that you have doubts yourself. Frankly the whole liquidation thing is rather embarrassing

Agree26 Disagree5

You keep believing that Hamilton Lad. Pity Mr Green and Mr Traynor don't agree with you. Look at the registered details of both clubs at companies house for any proof you need. The word you seem to be struggling with is LIQUIDATION, ask Gretna or Third Lanark about LIQUIDATION, then ask Leeds what happens when a CVA (you will find out even more about CVAs very, very shortly) is actually agreed and the club is saved from LIQUIDATION. So what company do the players play for? Who owns Ibrox, the company or the club? Why did Rangers not enter this seasons Champions League? Why did Rangers have to apply to join the league this season. Do any you cretins actually know what the ECA are?

Agree27 Disagree2

A couple of quotes from the media: "But the company that formerly ran the club have been. " "also stated that Rangers' current owners should". Timmy can't see the difference between the club and the company that runs it.
GC

Agree4 Disagree25

11 Apr 2013 23:06:58
@6 thought it was the mhedia that was trying to kill the rangers off. now your quoting them to suit yourself. can't have it both ways

Agree12 Disagree1

Tell that to the creditors that were stuffed mate! They're the real victims.
Ask them if they think you are the same club, or not what they think about it all? and then get yourself a sense of perspective. You inherited the ethos and spirit of Rangers 1872, and I wish you well with both, but the hard truth is its history died in ignomy in 2012. That's the price you paid to escape from the £100m of other people money that your club spent. To pretend otherwise is to insult those who were the real victims of this shameful episode, and betrays a delusion and an ingrained arrogance that you have no right to profess, and that will not win you friends and influence among other supporters and clubs. And you might have reason to treasure these in the coming weeks, who knows!

A hard truth is still easier than an easy lie, guys!
So man up, and move on.
The ethos and spirit is what matters, after all.

Agree19 Disagree3

@8 Correct me if I'm wrong but but didn't Rangers win the big tax case? Does Craig Whyte not owe the £17m to ticketus? I'm afraid your figure of £100m is way of the mark.

Agree1 Disagree14

@9 you're wrong

Rangers never won the big tax case and were found GUILTY in @30 out of 110 cases the remaining cases are currently being appealed

Agree7 Disagree1

@9 Craig white is guarentor of a loan for £18million to pay of the debt to LLoyds bank. When rangers went tits up they went after him for the money

Agree0 Disagree0

The thing I don't get, is if we are not the same club, why do u lot (CELTIC) fans come on here and talk about a team that doesn't concern u? u are all obsessed with rangers. like it or not the company died not the football club. and as stated by fifa and uefa glasgow rangers are the same club, as for gretna and 3rd lanark well that doesn't even warrant a reply, when they could afford a newco and is completly different, glasgow rangers 54 and counting.


HAMILTON LAD

Agree5 Disagree6

Ahhh, "obsessed", another of the great pointless mantras, well done Hamilton Lad, your about a "In Craig We Trust" away from having the whole set mentioned in one thread. In the meantime your club is ripping itself apart on far more serious matters or hadn't you noticed because you were so busy with trivial garbage?

Agree3 Disagree2

But it does concern us hamilton lad. apart from it being the best comedy show in town, rangers went bust owing celtic and me, a taxpayer, money. it looks as though its all a big scam to do just that.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 19:40:27
Am I the only one who thinks if charles green told all mccoist today was sunday he would believe him? Time to grow a pair ally.

Believable26 Unbelievable9

11 Apr 2013 18:15:18
I don't understand the mentality of many "viewers" of this site. To just click "disagree" with no thought or debate. How would they sound on "Question Time", - "errghhh I just disagree, disagree, because can not be bothered to think, click the button, debate done"

Believable5 Unbelievable44

Low life disagree with anything to stir up controversy and trouble. Just look a couple of posts down and the disagrees about Kris Commons missus and their still born baby, absolute pond life who disagree with that. PB

Agree26 Disagree9

Just disagreed but what was the point? how shall we take this debate on?

Agree3 Disagree14

Ban the " agree/ disagree " buttons as they are completely pointless and do not contribute anything to the points raised. I wonder how many " disagrees " I will get?
Liah Smit

Agree9 Disagree17

Celtic fan here. we have pretty much disagreed with so many posts on here with our points below but use just wint hear it so wot the point of even moving our fingers to write it. don't even know why I bother to post this. plains boy.

Agree18 Disagree6

Celtic man here, got to agree with the op, if you ain't got nothing to say, don't join in by disagreeing, PB the one's who disagree with the post you talk about are probably knuckle dragging bigot's who don't know any better, BTW that goe's for both side's of the divide
Tam

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 17:17:56
not re Rangers but merely a observation, so Strachan now says he does not have players with the quality or physique to compete right now, nice now that you have fixed up not only yourself but also your best man with a grand wee number, so much for all the initial BS.

Believable5 Unbelievable9

His best man? Are you sure?

Agree2 Disagree2

Cannot believe the disarees to post, does anybody really think there is any justification in Mcghee as number 2, his record is deplorable, and if you believe he would have got post without his best mate as manager you are deluding yourself.

Agree5 Disagree7

Its like mccoist and mcdowall and durrant its about who you trust, and believe will do a job for you

Agree0 Disagree0

@2 And how did Ally get his job's with Scotland and the gers?
Tam

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 18:13:08
Just watched the news and saw that kris commons Missus is to become an ambassador for simba charity for still born babies following the tragic news of their child Lola.

Knowing someone who is affected by a still born baby all I can say is good on Laura and kris.

God bless little Lola.

Jimmy true blue

Believable55 Unbelievable5

She does a ton of charity work mate. A real good person, if only the other wags had an ounce of her drive.

Agree34 Disagree2

See the fc*wits who disagree at times like this, they need named& shamed, & I hope karma bites em bigtime on the a$$. SM

Agree31 Disagree5

The people who pressed disagree are absolute persons take Celtic and rangers out the picture this was a baby's life who never did anything to anyone you need to take a good look in the mirror ya bunch of a!holes

Agree27 Disagree1

Well said number 3, they really are scum

Agree6 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 17:20:35
what we have to do is remember the size of our country.
We should have 3 leagues of 12 allowing some of the poorly supported teams to amagamate. Keep the premier format for all three divisions.

Lastly, and I think importantly, we should change the season to make the sport into a summer one. Ireland did it and other countries have done it successfully, with none of them reverting back to the winter.

Give notice of one more season to get the changes in place and give some of the smaller ones a chance to get into bed with each other.
42 clubs is too many for a small country like us.

Wee Bill

Believable25 Unbelievable10

11 Apr 2013 20:15:42
'Allowing' some of the teams to amalgamate? Exactly which teams do you know of that would be happy with that?

Agree6 Disagree6

11 Apr 2013 23:29:28
i don't know of any that would be happy, however, they would be even unhappier with extinction. Caley and Thistle did it WITHOUT moaning much.
I'm looking at the like of Montrose Arbroath Brechin East Srirling Stenjousmuir Cowdenbeath for example. All of whom have pathetic following as individuals.

Agree7 Disagree1

Amalgamation could maybe be avoided if a way could be found to have meaningful local derbies every year. you have morton and st mirren and ayr and killie never playing each other. money slipping thru fingers. something along the lines of NFL. permanent groups who always play every year and a rotation with the others. play offs deciding the championship. worth looking at? even if it was the league cup going back to the old sections but permanent ones. the fans are there but they are starved of meaningful matches. morton took 3500 to firhill on wed i'm told. drastic action is needed to give potential customers a good product not this idea we have set up by well meaning amateurs 150 years ago.

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 16:19:48
Why on earth would CW give a "personal" guarantee on a company he intended to put to the sword for profit. Why? He has made money since his late tewnties by buying and dissolving companies. He won't give personal gurantees, what charge must he have over the fixed assets of Rangers?

Believable18 Unbelievable3

11 Apr 2013 15:52:14
Anyone see the Dortmund display pre game from Tuesday? Phenomenal.

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/world-of-sport/dortmund-fans-amazing-champions-league-display-094310802.html

Gaz

Believable5 Unbelievable4

Loved the binoculars. The ref did not do Scotlands reputaion much good though, there were 5 goals in the game and 3 of them were offside!

Agree6 Disagree1

I have to say I have a soft spot for Dortmund & bayern that though its just amazing could be real under dogs in the semi

Lenny

Agree2 Disagree3

@1 is that not the linseman job?

Agree1 Disagree0

Yes No 3). Ref AND linesmans job. They were all from Scotland! It was a poor display of refereeing all round. To not spot 4 players offside when a ball is hoisted in? 4 players. - Yep, great result and excitement for Borrussia, but crap control from the ref and his team.

Agree0 Disagree1

N2 for my money bayern munich will win the tournament

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 15:20:51
Got a question for all fellow bears. Obviously we are getting wound up about being a different club bla bla bla, but none of that has ever been confirmed one way or another. So, if UEFA or FIFA (or both), ever came out and categorically said that Rangers as we know it did in fact die, what would your thoughts be? Would you continue to go and watch the new club and treat it as Rangers, even though technically it is not the club you have supported all that time?

Obviously all hypothetical, but I'm interested to know people's opinions on this.

s20c

Believable12 Unbelievable10

What is it s20c, were the answer's you got on the Celtic site not to your liking.
Tam

Agree3 Disagree3

I am just asking a question, which was addressed to fellow Rangers supporters. Have you got something to tell us?

s20c

Agree1 Disagree0

Op all bears would still support rangers after all its in our blue blood

Agree0 Disagree2

@2 You were on the Celtic sight asking them why they thought it was a new Ranger's, then your asking your fellow bear's if they would still support Rangers if FIFA or UEFA decided it was a new Rangers, of course they would because to them it would still be Rangers, as it is now. Have I got something to tell you, yes, your a t___ for even asking your fellow bear's the question.
Tam

Agree0 Disagree1

11 Apr 2013 15:00:07
If anything else happens, I genuinely would consider calling it a day. I don't want my lasting memories of Rangers being personic owners trying to screw us, and a team that struggles regularly to beat part-timers. I want to remember the good old days.

Believable17 Unbelievable8

Doe's anyone know the rumour that Delahunt and them were talking about on clyde tonight.
Tam

Agree6 Disagree2

11 Apr 2013 14:51:16
CW warned off acting as a "shadow director" while disqualified. "Shadow Director", ring any bells?

Believable11 Unbelievable3

11 Apr 2013 14:16:55
Whyte and Green are 2 men who specialise in asset stripping, that's all they do. Look at the number of failed companies between them. Look at the number of companies they have been Directors of, how many exist now. Its all public info. No way would Ticketus have lent this money to Whyte on a mere promise. Lookie here. one company CW is still a director of and no one knows what it does? Funny Name though, don't you think?

Team Discounts Plc is a Pending business incorporated in England & Wales on 10th November 2011. Their business activity has not been recorded. Team Discounts Plc is run by 2 current members. and 1 company secretary. It has no share capital. It is not part of a group.

The company has not yet filed accounts. Team Discounts Plc's risk score was amended on 14/03/2013.

Believable16 Unbelievable12

Good digging OP

Gaz

Agree7 Disagree7

If you disagree, take the time to explain why? don't just click "computer says no" button.

Agree10 Disagree14

11 Apr 2013 15:25:22
well said mate, has murray's sticky fingerprints all over it.

Agree10 Disagree6

11 Apr 2013 14:03:59
I'm a rangers fan of 30 years. I've sat in the same seat for those 30 years. I don't tend to contribute to forums, and don't attend supporters groups, but I am passionate about the following and hope it can be the basis of something huge.
We have been treated appallingly by Green. He has lied continually, and his links with Whyte are now apparent. In fact the only thing he's been truthful about is his intention to create personal wealth from the club. Why are we sitting back and taking this? Because we're supporters? Because we're lazy? Because we've no alternative? Here's my alternative.
Let's stay away from Ibrox for the remaining games of the season, and take a unified stance against the regime. He must rid the club of this man and the only way to do so is to flush him out. A refusal to attend, and a stance on refusing to buy season tickets whilst he's in charge.
Let's force change. Please fellow bears, let this post go viral. Let's for once truly unite and force our own future as a club. I urge you to post this wherever possible. No negativity please. Let us for once stand united.

Believable26 Unbelievable16

These are exactly the type of things you need to do, well said OP, you have more power than you appreciate.

Gaz

Agree13 Disagree5

Better to go to games and peacefully protest

Agree6 Disagree15

As much as I don't want to abandon watching Rangers I must agree with you something drastic needs to happen soon

Agree12 Disagree2

Good post, we were "big" enough to boycott a Scottish cup game "stupidly" when our team needed the support, but sit on our bloody hands doing nothing against the so called directors who have brought us all this grief. We should be showing Green and co how powerful we really are,,,, boycott everything now. If we don't he'll be fleecing us of our season ticket money then running like the other 2 con men Whyte and Murray. In fact why has that bloody man not been stripped of his title? let's contact our MPs etc this is a farcical joke he started the madness, let us for a change finish it.

Agree10 Disagree2

11 Apr 2013 17:30:54
I'm a Celtic fan that comes from a mixed family my uncle who is blue to the core has just turned his attitude towards the elite at rangers, where he has said in the past and gave us Celtic fans stick for it that we question everything, it is now rangers fans need to stick together and show they are rangers, and put a stop to this saga or the time is running out quicker than what yours think

Agree13 Disagree3

OP I don't think NOT going to game's now make's much difference ST for this season already been paid, as fror not payig season ticket's for next season think you have to be very careful you don't starve your club, although the revelation's over the past week might help the support.
Tam

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Apr 2013 12:53:29
Bomber was rite all along boycott starve green out now I urge all fellow bears not to spend a dime in rangers or anything to do way green or our club will be destroyed by a greedy Yorkshire man and whyte

Believable23 Unbelievable10

As opposed to being destroyed by our own fans?

Starve Green, starve the club

why is this so hard to understand

Agree3 Disagree5

11 Apr 2013 11:47:30
Im Fearing the worst. I personally don't think I can go through this saga again. I am Rangers through and through and have a serious illnesses and still follow my team week in week out. Green get the finger out or please leave. Prove who owns the deeds. If you've been lying your a brave man as they'll be millions of unhappy people. Time for some off these "Rangers men" (Walter, Ally and Murray) to ask serious questions.
John

Believable23 Unbelievable11

I fear myself that the time for Ally & Walter to have asked serious questions has already gone.

Hope I'm wrong but I think most Bears have sleepwalked into the same kind of trouble as last year.

Agree17 Disagree3

Funny how Ally and Walter and big Derek J suddenly start to ask questions when their pals jobs are at risk? this old boy network nonsense is part of the reason we in such a mess.
Lets clear the lot out now, Portsmouth fans looking to take over their club, surely we have the know how and people to be as good if not better. COME ON our team needs us NOW

Agree13 Disagree1

11 Apr 2013 08:57:08
Why would Ticketus lend £18 million to Whyte against a security he did not own?
One could conclude that SDM signed off on the deal as the club was his at the time.

Believable24 Unbelievable3

Yep. Nothing stacks up. Lending that amount to a man with no assets at the time and no rights to sell tickets because he says "I promise I will pay you back, I really promise, honest indian".

Agree15 Disagree6

Why would some one give you a mortgage against a house you don't own, Its on the assumption that you use that money to buy the house. This is not any differrent than what happend at Liverpool, Man United and Aston Villa and is legal.

So what are the police investigating?

Agree6 Disagree13

Police are also investigating the information leak. Hopefully the owner if the tax case website is found, and is jailed for leaking information which he/she was not privy to share.

Agree7 Disagree9

@2
the security against the asset you are buying needs to be something other than that asset.
Otherwise the loan is unsecured.
And that takes you back to the point. Why would ticketus lend on an unsecured basis to Whyte?
I think that it wasn't unsecured. It is likely that SDM signed off on it.

Agree8 Disagree1

Absolutely nothing about all of this rings true. Craig Whyte, the dodgiest looking wee character I have ever seen, passes the Murray & Ticketus test and is loaned £18m to pay off Lloyds and take over Rangers. Neither of these multi-million pound businesses could find out that he was banned from being a director for 7 years. Aye f*ckin right.

Whilst in administration Rangers are allowed to sell their main assets at a ridiculously low cost, taking away any payday for the creditors. Then they go bust and Green starts a new company with the assets in place. Just to rub it in he immediately says the assets are worth 20x what he paid. Aye f*ckin right.

I can only assume that Whyte holds the film rights for this saga. It'll make Inception seem straight forward. Maybe it'll be called Deception.

Honestly, tried to explain what's going on with Rangers to an English business colleague and he looked at me is if I was mental. I actually was beginning to think I was.

Hopefully there's light at the end of the tunnel.

Shuggy

Agree13 Disagree1

The ONE asset whyte had of significant value is IBROX.

so he as CEO of ibrox puts floating charge on the ibrox deeds, then allows admin event, and the asset move from RFC to whoever

floating charge back to whyte still exists even after transfer.

Whyte sus about d&p and taped them, whyte sus about green and taped him.

Whyte now own £18m - if and its a big if the floating charge on ibrox exists (will be on the deeds) - then he can given that charge over to pay debt.

Why do you thing green NEVER shown deeds.

Agree10 Disagree2

@4

So never bought a house or car or anything like that eh. The debt is secured against the asset purchased.

Agree5 Disagree2

11 Apr 2013 15:23:46
Regarding the rtc blog-its whoever leaked the info to them that's in trouble and as long as the owner/editor has journalist qualification he, or she, does not need to name their source. what it all really boils down to is that if old rangers were run correctly it would never have bloody happened!yet again another self inflicted drama where its easier to blame others than blame the right "peepuuul".

Agree9 Disagree5

11 Apr 2013 08:20:09
hi ed, surely must be now time for a public enquirey into this whole rangers business, I can't believe no individual or body didn't know what was happening at the early stages, lawyers, accountants or banks. this has now gone on far to long, which has in turn brought down not only a football club, but a business and one of scotlands biggest instituations, as I said its time now for a public enquiry!

Believable25 Unbelievable10

11 Apr 2013 07:14:11
Gordon Strachan spoting rubbish about a breakaway European Laegue with 2 divisions and 38 top clubs including Rangers and Celtic. What rubbish is this. We already have The Champions League and The Europa League. Is that not enough European football for sponsors and fans. And what would happen to these 2 existing competitions if a break-away European League was formed. Makes no sense. Do well domestically and the reward is European football. End of.

Believable12 Unbelievable14

Barcelona are backing plans for a 64 team European league, so I'm guessing it has some creedence.

Agree7 Disagree6

And it was also rubbish when Green came away with it. So many believed him sadly.

Agree2 Disagree2

Barcelona are backing it as they think they will more money, does football no favours. Will do "wee" clubs no favours.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Apr 2013 00:37:54
really want green out, hope murray sacks him he's getting the club no where and only spouting rubbish every day and its getting really boring now, lies after lies after lies, hope us the fans will take action to his fantasy life, hope walter becomes chief ex, the man that supported rangers as a boy, fans start shouting green out next home game.

Believable19 Unbelievable16

Walter that we've hardly heard a peep from until yesterday?

Walter who was happy to come on board and take Green's shilling so Green could make more on the share issue knowing the vast majority of the support trust him 100%?

Walter who continually asked for more money while manager so he could sign the likes of Kyle Lafferty when Rangers needed to be as frugal as possible in the years leading up to administration?

Walter who is still to deny he was on an EBT?

And Walter whose Knights failed to step up to the plate when it really mattered letting Green take control of the club?

Sorry, brilliant manager but no thanks. What Rangers need is a whole clean sweep with men who have not been tarnished by the chaos of the past few years.

Agree21 Disagree7

Be very careful Green will not tolerate dissent from any quarter. The guy is a dictator, unhinged and is quite capable of anything. Could quite easily lock the gates and deprive the football club access.
This happened to Hull City a few years ago. Until the ownership of Ibrox is determined we should tread with care.
Green will have plans should season ticket sales fall short of expectations. He may be mad but he's not daft.

Agree13 Disagree4

Green only has 8% of shares he can do NOTHING by himself in fact he better watch what the rest of the share holders want to do with him. Les

Agree10 Disagree2

@ 3. ) Green has more shares than that who is he trying to fool, he would be booted out now if he did not have some sort of controlling interest

Agree6 Disagree1

Was the new co not set up so that one person has no control?. a group may but one holding no. Les

Agree2 Disagree1

1. ) yes I agree with you there but walter had no idea that we were in debt

Agree1 Disagree7

Green has got enough of his men on the board, Smith etc are window dressing.

Agree5 Disagree1

11 Apr 2013 00:11:30
Portsmouth supporters take control of club that's how you do it all history etc saved

Believable28 Unbelievable18

As I have been posting all season about a similar situation- AFC Wimbledon were formed following a meeting in the town hall in protest about the franchise mob MK D*NS moving to Milton K*ynes- money was donated by those in attendance that night and the club applied to The Minor Counties League and formed AFC Wimbledon - players were quickly signed and as the story goes " it only took 9 years to win championships and gain promotions" to finally re-enter Leauge Div 2 last season. This season we are struggling, currently 4th bottom but we have one of the lowest playing budgets in League 2. In view of this The Wimbledon Fighting Fund has been set up recently for fans to donate funds which will solely be used for transfer funds. example if 1000 supporters pay just 20pd per month by direct debit this brings in an additional 200,000pds to the club. Season tickets are just over the 4,000 mark- The fact is all the above took place, above board and totally legal. I pay my membership to The Dons Trust and one membership entitles me to one equals vote. AFCW helped FCManchester amongst another clubs to start afresh and with a positive outlook. it can be done at all different levels of fanbase and finance, but in all cases its been the fanbase that have moved things on. And i'm a regular member of a Rangers Supporters Club in case some people think i'm from the dark side and having a go. We are Rangers, 55 titles and counting, let's get this mess sorted out and get our clubs proud tradition back on track.
Cheers -AFCW

Agree1 Disagree1

 
Change Consent