11 Apr 2015 18:39:45
The rangers team that I would hope starts against raith rovers tomorrow would be-
Robinson
Mcgregor,zaliukas,mohsni,wallace,
Law,shiels,murdoch,vuckic,
clark,miller
Believable0
Unbelievable5
11 Apr 2015 20:28:46
Bell/robinson
McGregor zaliukas mohsni
Temps murdoch law shields
Vuckic
Clark Gallagher
Agree1
Disagree4
11 Apr 2015 20:48:54
clark and miller to much alike to score goals
Agree2
Disagree3
11 Apr 2015 21:24:25
Quite right Ceexxx,Vuckic wasted on the wing,that's where he's best.
Agree0
Disagree0
11 Apr 2015 21:51:24
I wouldn't just restrict vuckic to the wing,its the no.10 role I want vuckic to be playing gkk,in other words in the hole behind the 2 strikers and a free role in general so he can float between going out wide and coming inside to link the play to our 2 strikers and can become a 3rd striker if you like,giving vuckic this freedom is best and makes him very hard for the opposition to pick up
Agree2
Disagree3
12 Apr 2015 07:48:44
If Welsh is fit he would be playing ahead of law and move Walsh out left.
Agree0
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 08:39:21
Bell
McGregor Moshni Zaliukas Wallace
Murdoch Shiels Law Walsh
Vuckic
Miller Clark
Options are limited upfront but agree Vuckic is better playing immediately behind the two strikers and Hardie or Gallacher on the bench.
Agree0
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 10:09:56
I agree with ce x would like to see Gallagher given a run out performed well at the tail end of last season
Agree0
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 12:21:49
Copland the ref might notice an extra player lol? Don't like McGregor at Rb he's okay but would rather have him as a 3rd centre back.dont Think Miller and Clark can't break down defences try a younger player who will maybe try something a bit different wether it's gallagher, hardie or stoney or whatever.
Agree1
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 14:27:29
CeXXX- well spotted 12 players but who knows slip one on when the ref s no watching.lol
Agree0
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 15:05:43
If that extra guy is Daly or Miller or Clark I think we would be better without them lol!
Agree1
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 15:11:38
so much for my crystal ball clark opens the scoring oh dear?
Agree0
Disagree0
11 Apr 2015 12:07:59
I read in the DR, Alastair Johnston quoted as saying Rangers should ditch the old badge, even just slightly, as Ashley has acquired the rights. We shouldn't give an inch on this in memory of our grandparents and beyond. It must be non negotiable.
Believable6
Unbelievable1
11 Apr 2015 12:30:12
What to do instead then,,,,,,, because in the name of our memories we will not be making any profit for our club?? decision time is going to be a no winner.
Agree3
Disagree2
11 Apr 2015 12:55:46
just pay the 5 mil and be done with it once and for all
Agree3
Disagree3
11 Apr 2015 12:57:44
If it means Ashley being damaged and walking away from us,new badge it is. only a badge, the club is what our future fans want to be secure.
Agree2
Disagree0
11 Apr 2015 13:39:16
LANI for all we know Ashley's lawyers might have inserted a clause in the loan agreement that doesn't allow for a change of design.
We should never underestimate this slug of a man.
Agree2
Disagree0
11 Apr 2015 13:43:11
Surely a court would overturn this and former board prosecuted as they were not acting in clubs best interests?
Just use the lion rampant. like the rst shirts.
Agree1
Disagree2
11 Apr 2015 14:09:55
What utter nonsense from Johnston. Why not just pay our debts? That way the trademarks are returned to us. I don't think it's wise to play hardball with Ashley, remember he also owns the Rangers name.
Agree1
Disagree2
11 Apr 2015 17:29:05
say we pay the loan back yet we still don't own the rights cause Ashley has pulled a fast one on us and then what do we do plus this just ain't about this deal with Ashley its about all the rest of them to the bargain this is why board are not just handing him the cash for the club to make money we need all these deals done fairly if Ashley can not see this then we are in big trouble he is calling shots fans king ect are powerless nothing has changed just different names in the board room
Agree1
Disagree1
11 Apr 2015 21:38:14
Pay the loans back and fight any other claims that arise in court. Do as Keiran Prior suggested. He is no fool and talks sense. Also check if old board can be sued for gross negligence . They certainly did not act for the good of business only for one shareholder.
Agree0
Disagree0
12 Apr 2015 05:47:28
Yes Ashley is calling the shots. Either the board find a way of working with Ashley or liquidate and start again. The idea that Dave King et al won the war was always a joke.
Agree0
Disagree1