Rangers Banter Archive February 16 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


16 Feb 2013 22:29:10
Should alarm bells be ringing with the latest Alexander news today? Offering him a new deal on a 50% wage cut, from around £10k per week to £5k, would seem pretty sensible as it is a hell of a lot of money for a third division player. The fact he was only offered a one year, Lee McCulloch got a two, deal you can understand his frustrations. What the worry is that the new deal was to kick in straight away, not at the season end when his old contract ended. FFS are things that bad with cash flow? Time some questions were asked.

Believable27 Unbelievable9

Well big lee will likely stay with us until we reach the soon to be scottish premiership. Alexander isn't a long term prospect. He will likely become 2ndchoice behind cammy bell, why pay a 2nd choice keeper 10k when we can offer him half that, and then he can decide if he wants to accept, or he can move on. Seems sensible to me?

Agree13 Disagree14

1# I agree but the worry is trying to cut his money immediately. Smacks of blackmail a wee bit, extension for a year cuts immediate or deal off the table.

Agree14 Disagree1

Thats exactly what it is. But that's how the business world works.

Agree2 Disagree5

What's the worry he is on 10k in the third division! What chairman would not want that player on a lower wage ASAP were is the blackmail? This is exactly the way we should be with players, no one is bigger than rangers, if he wants to leave then let him, we're else will he play in front of 40k plus every second week and have training facilities like Murray park?

John

Agree5 Disagree7

It's worrying in the extreme.
The player has a current contract and the club has to honour that through to its end.
Halfing players salaries mid season, not paying invoices, false promises from CEO and ridiculous statements.
I really want to know who owns MP, Ibrox and the lease on the Albion Car Park? Early in the purchase process it was in the press that the assets were "hived" off into other companies.
Why is everyone cool with the shares prospectus stating the deeds and names on the deeds have not been seen?

Agree17 Disagree2

This shows anyone at or contemplating joining Rangers that Green could roll you over at any point while you're there.
A contract means nothing to the guy.

Agree15 Disagree1

Yeah a great reward for being loyal to the club at it's time of need, I thought they were all to be legends.

Agree11 Disagree1

17 Feb 2013 11:02:34
Op regarding cash flow. There are rumours that repairs at ibrox need to be done immediately.
also talk of renting Hampden next season, could this be why extra cash is needed?

Agree11 Disagree6

Poster 8) What rumours, must be from dafties. We can not rent Hampden in 2014. It is hosting The Commonwealth games. Does anyone read the news? Hampden surface is being raised 1.9metres to facilitate the construction of an athlectics track and field facility. No football pitch at Hampden in 2014. My god, some of these rumours.

Agree9 Disagree2

Hampden cannot be leased. It has to close most of 2013/ early 2014 for major projects for commonwealth games preparation.

Agree7 Disagree2

The Hampden rumours are coming from Rangers fans, believe it or not, concerned Rangers fans - you know, ones who don't believe everything Green says.

Agree10 Disagree3

SO Green is happy to tell us that 'traitors' like Davies and McGregor will never be welcomed back at Ibrox but then treats Alexander - who showed loyalty to the club - with contempt.

Explain that one away if you will Charles.

As for the renting Hampden rumour that must be the biggest load of mince I've heard so far this year.

Agree12 Disagree1

@9 It would appear you might be a daftie. Rangers won't need to lease hampden for a year. The rumour is the work on the stadium will overlap the start of the season by around 6-8 weeks. This means at worst 3-4 games played there, from august this year. No conflict with the Hampden refurb

Agree3 Disagree5

Yes it's funny Greene greetin about the SFA wanting to change thing's, half way through a season but it's alright for him to try and blackmail Alexander to change his contract, half way through the season
Tam

Agree7 Disagree3

Poster 13. The refurb at Ibrox, will take a long time unless Mr Green uses a sticky plaster approach. Touch anything structural there and you will have a contamination problem. Do you understand how Ibrox was constructed? It needs six months to sort the place out minimum. Think you will find reconstruction at Hampden is well under way by that time. So looks like sticky Plaster approach from Green.

Agree4 Disagree1

We're is the blackmail? He's been offered a contract, accept it or reject it simple as that. He's on 10k a week and green is trying to cut that down an people are moaning and people would be moaning if he offered the same wages, can the guy win?

John

Agree3 Disagree4

@15# Agreed. the structural work brings the asbestos problem to the fore but it seems to be lots of pipework and various electrical lines need replaced ASAP. This is not a major expense as such and would be, estimated, 6-8 weeks.

Agree1 Disagree4

16 Feb 2013 22:04:09
Opinions folks.

How would you feel about Steven Davis, or any of the other players who abandoned the club, one day returning?

For me it's an absolute non-starter. I would not have expected these guys to stay and play in SFL3. However, they should have 100% transferred over. I hear people say, "but we don't know the ins and outs of it all. " And I acknowledge that, but if it was good enough for Mo Edu, Ale Bedoya and others to transfer over and then wait for their move to get the club a decent fee, then it should have been good enough for all the so-called 'Rangers men'


SC93

Believable14 Unbelievable16

The players who deserted the club were always going to be sold and if they were true Rangers men they would have signed over on the understanding that they could leave for fees between £500k-£1m. I am sure the clubs that snapped them up for free would have still been happy to pay those fees and the club would have got much needed cash. What Irks me and many other fans is that these players chose not to do this and this could have led to the death of the club. In particular Naismith who had been supported by the club through 2 major knee problems and Ness who might have had to quit the game had it not been for Rangers taking him all over Europe to cure his persistent injury problem. I for one wouldn't want any of them back and I can't honestly see any of them wanting to come back

Agree16 Disagree9

16 Feb 2013 23:01:24
They weren't 'rangers men' they were players. It has already been ruled they didn't have to transfer over. So, whether you think they had a 'moral obligation' to has no bearing on the matter. Many other bears on here saying the reason they left was greed. Them staying to benefit rangers financially was greed. They had no legal obligation to stay

Agree14 Disagree4

Transfer over from where to what? I thought you where the same club

Agree22 Disagree4

How quickly we forget what sacrifices these players made for the old club.

Agree19 Disagree6

Steven davis refused to transfer over and now the fee will go to oldco and be used to pay the debt if you ask me davis done more for the real rangers than the other players and fans who jumped ship to greens new club and left the real rangers to sink

Agree21 Disagree4

17 Feb 2013 01:37:34
These guys took a 75% wage cut to save the club and the tea lady's and back round staff all the while duff and phelps were raking in a fortune!
So aye don't c the problem in them coming bk
Cbear

Agree17 Disagree5

Did Southampton not pay rangers 800k for Davis?

John

Agree5 Disagree0

With the SFA ruling under TUPE players were entitled to walk away, and did not need to join newco, any monies clubs paid to Green are all legally due to be paid back. {Ed001's Note - no they are not, that just means they didn't have to pay. Unfortunately, they agreed a contract and have to honour it, end of. They should have waited until they had clarification.}

Agree4 Disagree2

OP, if you want to put a question forward for opinion you should word the question in a neutral manner. Your question was loaded toward your own opinion with the use of the word "abandoned".
The players did not abandon the club, they chose not to transfer from one club to a new club.
I also disagree that the clubs who took the players would still have been keen if money was involved.
Al

Agree3 Disagree1

I knew exactly what I was doing.

SC93

Agree0 Disagree3

OP the player's who deserted the club?. Look at the way the club is treating one who stayed, bet he wish's he had went with the rest. Seem's loyalty only goe's one way with new Ranger's.
Tam

Agree4 Disagree0

@8) Ed I'm sure that's a legal issue and they have a watertight case. Green obviously lied. The players QC said Green was knowingly stating wrongful facts. That can be even seen legally as fraud. {Ed001's Note - only if the team has not paid any money yet, if they have paid it would be tough, as that would be acceptance of the contract in law. If they have disputed the issue, asked for clarification that they have to pay etc, then they would have not actually paid any money, so they would just not pay. I was referring to any that have made payments, rather than disputing the requirement to pay.}

Agree2 Disagree1

Davis money was sent to the sfa they hold the money and will now turn it over to the liquidators pending greens appeal

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Feb 2013 17:47:18
re- pre season tournies and glamour friendlies I would suggest any invitations to attend these to the 3rd division champions will be due to the fact that
a) the scottish champions will be unavailable due to european commitments via qualifying rounds for the champions League

B) you will be able to provide a very large and welcome support to any ground thus being what you all claim to hate being --A cash Cow--

i would respectfully suggest the Linfield game would be great for you
and possibly organise another legends game at Ibrox and you will be quids in.

i would also suggest any charity games you should invite Star players to play rather than have man united and Arsenal treating them as training games

Believable16 Unbelievable15

Pre season friendlies are exactly that - friendly - not a competitive game. Every club takes them easy to avoid injuries.

As for the cash cow, every preseason tournament usually includes latge profile clubs like ours, who can attract 50,000 to a game

Agree4 Disagree18

I sincerely hope that while we play a friendly in the sunshine you experience an enjoyable trip to the edges of Siberia.
Your big come-down is just around the corner, so we look forward to how you will handle it.

Agree9 Disagree22

It wasnt that long ago blackburn played pre season against ayr. so don't all pee your pants

Agree5 Disagree3

17 Feb 2013 00:29:11
we wait with baited breath then for those high profile clubs extending an invitation then. lol. don't be too surprised when Hughie Green starts coming out with " we have had to turn down invitations from X why and Z clubs due to circumstances,,, " as the only thing he has delivered from all his pontifications and promises is the share issue which benefitted him more than your club. in the words of Gerry mcGuire " show us the money"

Agree9 Disagree0

#3 Blackburn played Ayr in a testamonial for ally McCleod, that was back in 1993. don't expect any serious team to come up and bail out your team. Star players won't come to scotland to play a third rate "rangers" team.

Agree3 Disagree5

Selic fans buy into the whole friendly game thing year on year out. Why Cause you mugs think its brilliant. RFC have knocked it back for years.

Agree2 Disagree9

17 Feb 2013 12:44:40
@6 don't quite understand your post? are you saying RFC doint play in friendlies and it is celtic mugs that buy into it? if so why all the announcements of friendlies this year from Hughie Green ( mr opportunity) Money issues maybe?

Agree5 Disagree0

16 Feb 2013 16:37:27
Uhhhm. Bull attack from Charles Green. Buying Arsenal shares back? How he do that? They are not listed on any exchange - they change hands between private owners. And no ones sells once they get their hands on Arsenal shares (unless you are Craig Whyte). Even the Arsenal Supporters trust only own 3 shares. (Which were bequeathed to them on an old ladies death). No chance of getting those shares back. What planet is Green on?

Believable23 Unbelievable5

Green's Bull is only matched by Ally's. his incessant blame game on Craig Whyte in the media is embarrassing.
SDM, the old rangers board and yes Ally sunk RFC. Not Whyte.
Whyte did his damnedest to keep it going with no money.

Agree19 Disagree9

1) you are clearly deluded. Ally sank old Rangers and Whyte tried to keep them going. Perhaps you can answer one question

When Whyte took over there was £3m in the bank, two weeks after taking over he got £13m in season ticket money. The money to pay Lloyds was borrowed from Ticketus, he got £5.5m for Jelavic. How come in six months we are bust?

Believe me Whyte filled his pockets,, how dare you blame McCoist for their downfall. The problem was a chancer saw a quick way to make millions.

Clearly Sir DM was in large part to blame, but when sold they had £18m debt, which had been reduced from £40m.

Agree7 Disagree18

Ally's words in the media are calculated and well thought through. They are designed to dupe fans. To blame Craig Whyte for everything, which is simply not true.

Agree14 Disagree2

SDM in the RFC sales agreement put the statement that the Arsenal shares could be useful as a source of revenue.
Written in black and White.

Agree10 Disagree1

@2. no teams currently based on the edges of siberia. so now you want to argue about the feckin weather? I think the point being made is that its another of charlies fantasies. no facts or details. whoever announced they would be playing in a tournament but they don't know where or who with? never forget the dallas cowboys and the players he was going to sign from the euros. its nobody else making this up only charlie. you just go along with whatever he says just like murray and whyte. celtic in champ. league certain as rain in greenock. that'll do.

Agree2 Disagree0

If Craig Whyte is indeed found guilty of having illegally purchased Rangers through criminal means then surely the Arsenal shares could then be regarded as stolen goods? Just a thought!

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Feb 2013 16:30:40
Am watching game and I think it is the best
performance for a while. The ball is staying on the
floor, and four fantastic goals.

Much better than the high ball game we have, been
playing. Templeton is causing havoc and both his goals
have been top notch.

Believable14 Unbelievable10

16 Feb 2013 14:52:44
Can somebody please explain the talk of buying an
English club, Portsmouth are the latest name.

So we buy them, then what?
Our home ground is then in Portsmouth, we presumably
will have to have Portsmouth in our name. Am I meant
to travel to Portsmouth every second week?
Or we relocate the ground to Ibrox, are FA, UEFA, FIFA
going to allow that, no.

For the last twelve months plus, I as a Rangers fan have
been concerned that Rangers would no longer exist, and
if we buy any club then the Rangers will no longer exist
in my mind. Let's stop all this talk of tricking our way
out of Scotland, let's get back to the top league, let's
take our rightful place at the top of Scottish football, let's
get back into Europe.

Whilst I think Scottish football is garbage, we are Scottish,
we have won 54 Scottish titles,. If the rules ever change
about cross borders football then yes, great. However
I am fifty years old, I have been listening to " we will
play in England or European league" for forty of those
years, and it is still no nearer to happen than it ever
was.

We have been arguing that we are the same club, which
of course we are, we will not be the same club if we
buy our way into England.

Believable15 Unbelievable19

16 Feb 2013 14:16:03
Ed can you post this please, I feel hooper and samaras cheated the whole way through CL game after game they would stand in front of the goalkeeper stopping him from moving towards the ball at corners and free kicks, is this cheating? I think so, did other teams complain? NO.

Believable18 Unbelievable27

Standing in front of the keeper is not illegal and is a lot different to being manhandled by the keeper and defenders. Hooper and Samaras are entitled to stand there, they are however not supposed to be attacked.

Agree29 Disagree16

Maybe it's up to the goalkeeper to kick them out of the road.

Agree9 Disagree9

@2 if the keeper kicked them out the road you would be wanting a penalty, always cheated never defeated.

Agree18 Disagree18

To no2 typical rangers tactic then, yep you must be the same club after all. pat-c

Agree13 Disagree2

@3: if a keeper kicked a Rangers player out of the way, would you want a penalty?

Agree13 Disagree1

No but the Samaras blatant dive in the last group game is illegal. Seeking clarification on that are they?

Agree17 Disagree16

1) intentionally blocking the keeper is illegal - it's called obstruction. Hooper had no intention of playing the ball. His only role was to obstruct the keeper. this ploy worked against benfica when mulgrew crossed, hooper blocked the keeper & samaras scored. the juve management were well aware that this was going to be used again at set pieces so they set out to stop it - a totally professional approach.

Agree10 Disagree15

Did samaras not dive for a penalty in cl not that long ago that eventually took tic thru? What goes around comes around. WATP

Agree8 Disagree9

How can a penalty be awarded for pushing when the ball is not in play, only if the pushing happens after the corner is taken can it be a foul! The ref can speak/warn/book players when ball is out of play but cannot award the penalty - perhaps the responce from the authorities should simply be to send a copy of the rule book to lawless & lemon and treat them with the contemp they show the referees!

Agree7 Disagree4

OMG and no rangers player has ever stood in front of the keeper and to the persons taking about diving? God you need to grow up! I keep forgetting about novo, lovencrabs, Burke etc etc seriously that glass house you all live in must be really nice! Dillusional, the lot of ya!

Agree6 Disagree4

The standing on the goal line thing you speak off was started by jack charlton and alf ramsey in england matches in the sixties. jack went on to do it for lufc for years. there was a rammy at the time and clarification was given. all players and clubs in the world understand the rules regarding this. its not obstruction. the tactic employed by juve took this a step further and became violent conduct. there are precedents and penalties have been given. by asking for clarification celtic have forced uefa to give a ruling on this matter. its obvious it can't continue and in the future penalties will always be given. I said long before the game that the italians would come up with something which will require the referee to be complicit. its blew up in juves faces a bit as its a big talking point across europe and celtic are being backed by many who have suffered from italian cheating. only this week berlusconi (ex ac milanl) stated that bribery is part of business. he will certainly have bribed refs and probably players. roma have actually admitted bribing the ref against dufc in ec semi. brian clough said it over and over again. they do it as a matter of course, doesn't always work but certainly does you no harm. in the dufc cade the money was simply handed over in a restaurant by a prof. crook. easy.

Agree3 Disagree1

These comments are so pathetic they are embarrassing. The Juventus Players got away with blatant assault, only a blind man could argue against. let's look at the game with open eyes and not be blinkered. If it was a Rangers player I would say the same thing. This was not football and it sums up thew officials in a year where so much blatant cheating and bribery is now being exposed. No single person should have the power and decision making that a referee does without challenge. One man's decision can have a team lose millions, a manager lose his job and fans be left feeling cheated. I don't care what colour the strip is. IMO

Agree3 Disagree3

16 Feb 2013 13:12:18
Another dossier from the bhoys. have Celtic never cheated, had players diving, had dodgy decisions from bad refs? Wee example, last season's semi against Hearts. Lennon ran on the field to berate the ref about Hearts penaly, and ask why Celtic never got one. Tv pictures revealed the following-Celtic's equalising goal was offside, Hearts penalty was awarded after the ball hit the arms of TWO Celtic players, and the one they were screaming for was nowhere near the Hearts player's arms or hands. has the man ever accepted a defeat gracefully?he's had a few, has'nt he?so all the above are ok until they happen to Celtic, and then suddenly become moral issues. that, my friends, IS the Celtic Way.

Believable36 Unbelievable21

16 Feb 2013 12:58:10
more spin about young players signing on they are being paid buttons

Believable7 Unbelievable16

Where is this? I'm sure the boys are quite happy getting long deals.

Agree10 Disagree7

Can Mr green actually win? People on here complaining we paid players to much now we are playing players not enough?

Agree15 Disagree6

Would you rather that they were being overpaid?
what's your point?

Agree8 Disagree6

16 Feb 2013 11:37:20
Just read an article on the a web site app, outlining the top 20 best supported clubs in Europe this season based on average attendances. We are sitting 13th, ahead of other huge clubs like AC Milan & Liverpool, as well as Celtic and Feyenoord. We have an average of over 46,000, an amazing statistic, made more impressive by the fact our capacity is lower than most of these clubs. It just goes to show what we already know, our fans are without doubt the best in Scotland, backed up by the facts on show in this article, and up there with the best in Europe. World wide they are talking about Rangers supporters for the way we have stuck by our club and been a driving force in helping the club survive and maintain it's glorious 140 year history. They also need look no further than these stats to know for a fact that we will be back on top. We know it and they know it.

Given our position, I could not be more proud to be a bear. We are showing ourselves to be everything our club stands for. Class, dignity and loyalty.

SC93

Believable27 Unbelievable30

Well done to every man woman and child that have helped our team in its moment of need. Stand tall and proud.

Agree19 Disagree14

16 Feb 2013 13:47:50
still not accounting for cheapest tickets out of the top 20 as well I see and if you don't think that it is a factor you are more deluded than ever.
Q. can you give an example of any of greens promises that have materialised apart from those that have EARNED him money from your good selves and how does that sit with all you loyal and dedicated fans??
see he is saying now about an american pre season tour without dates, venues or opponents is that what non-deluded people call a "thought"

Agree21 Disagree13

@1: why didn't they all club together to raise more than they did before liquidation? This could have been added to any CVA pot, surely, if the fans groups had been more organised and teamed up with one of the bidders?

Agree16 Disagree6

16 Feb 2013 14:27:59
Green building friendships across the globe in places like Dubai and Australia, where he's met hundreds of Bears.

Pre season US tour very likely + tournament along with LA Galaxy & Newcastle, charity match with man united and most likely one too with Arsenal, the money being generated to buy back our historic shares in that club. One against Linfield too, the world's two most successful clubs to play in Belfast.

Tic fans beginning to realise yet they're being left behind?

Agree10 Disagree20

Dont you understand the position at Arsenal. NO ONE WILL SELL YOU THOSE SHARES BACK!! Shareholders are fighting amongst themselves for tiny amounts of share like 6 or seven to try to gain 30% of the club. Arsenal shares gone forever. Green deluded, or conning you. Google "Arsenal shares". Do your own research

Agree16 Disagree5

@4: if all of that happens (if, bearing in mind Green's record with statements) it's all part of Rangers playing catch-up. It's not Rangers fans that friendships need to be built with, but others, and Green seems intent on making enemies with everyone else.

Agree13 Disagree1

You won't see those shares again. Who will sell their shares in Arsenal? Do you not follow football news at all? There is a desperate power struggle at Arsenal and every share counts. The Russian needs just 31 more shares for his goal of owning 30% of the club. think he is going to sell the 6 shares he bought off Whyte back to Rangers? Think on. Arsenal shares rarely change hands.

Agree11 Disagree3

@4 Are you having a laugh, your going to play friendly's against these teams and you think you are leaving us behind. Don't you realise these clubs feel sorry for you, you are the sort of person green loves mugs like you will make this man very rich.

Agree16 Disagree2

@2

Of course the tickets will be cheaper, we were placed in lowest tier of Scottish football. that's not the point though, the fans are backing the club when majority of opposing fans wanted to see club go under.

Agree5 Disagree7

@3 why should Rangers Fans have chipped in to pay off Craig Whytes Tax? We all got Absolutely screwed we've put major amounts of money into that club for years & all we get fed back is lies!

Agree3 Disagree7

You weren't placed anywhere. your new club was granted permission to join the SFL.

Agree14 Disagree3

Reply no 4. left behind?!? Well clear at top of the countrys top league, not the bottom, still in Scottish Cup, debt free, and not by cheating (liquidation then claiming to be same club, ignoring old club debts, cheating) no lying chief exec taking our clubs fans for a ride. again and oh yeah, last 16 of the Champions League. and WE are left behind?
Whatever it is you are smoking pal it's doing you no favours!

Agree18 Disagree7

SC93 Where's the loyalty to Alexander.
Tam

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Feb 2013 21:26:10
not a rumour but if you read this, would love your feedback, (ps ED been trying to post a few times just wanting a few opinions) what does everyone think of Green? Ibrox being refurbed ground round Ibrox to be bought and refurbed, shirt sponser and kit manufacture to be named, don't think this gut is up to much, think of it when Gers can buy players honestly think we will hear every excuse under the sun why we didn't pat an extra 50 pence to clinch the deal, I might get slated for this. or sme folk might agree with me in thinking that Green is fleecing us at ANY turn??

Believable22 Unbelievable9

Are we so skint that we can't give Alexander a new contract

He TUPEd over and showed true loyalty and now he will be allowed to walk away for NOTHING at the summer

We were told that anyone who stayed would be a LEGEND

.

Agree18 Disagree8

I agree with you mate I think we're being lead down a bad road again we just have to hope Ally or Walter will turn around and say this time because none of us listened to Alistair Johnson last time, I just feel it was very convenient that Greens bid was the only one accepted by D&P he probably was the highest bidder yes but it's clear to see he's in it for one thing only & just like Whyte he wouldn't lose any sleep over killing our club!

Agree17 Disagree5

Lots of claims but till he delivers on at least one the jury will be out. He needs to be careful, he is sailing very close to breaking stock market rules regarding company statements.

Agree15 Disagree3

Green is only in it for the money. He is a business man first and foremost but he can see the goal for him and for us - get out of scottish football into a more profitable league. He has laid out his intentions to take the fight to whatever court is necessary and I think he will because it is his greed that drives him on. In The Sun the dark side have John Hartson rolling out the same old bitter vile against him on the day that Green announces that he has written to the PM with his intention to take the Rangers fight to court. For f*!cks sake is this all Hartson has to say? Does he not have anything new?. The sports editor in the sun should be ashamed of himself allowing this rubbish to be written. He says that Green is the loan ranger. Doesn't he know that there are over 45,000 of us supporting our club and quoting a famous line wherever we end up "WE WILL FOLLOW ON".

Agree6 Disagree15

@2;Did'nt ally endorse whyte? can't see him rocking the boat somehow.

Agree12 Disagree2

Good business men want to make money yes, but they also want to leave a good profitable company also, green strikes me as someone who wants a quick buck, and doesn't care what he leaves behind.

Agree4 Disagree0

@4 you are a tool! Who cares what Hartson says! But the absolute drivel and propaganda that you are being fed by your bitter and twisted writers is only fueling your own dimented view of your new club!
45000 fans turning up?! Yeah at very low prices, school give always, free entrance after half time lol
I was in the SR mess at faslane when rangers people (don't know why they let the tax dodging on to the base) were trying to give away large amounts of free tickets! Not many takers at all pmsl. strangely enough I haven't come across many Rangers supporters in the armed forces, hmmm I wonder why?

Agree3 Disagree0

 
Change Consent