Rangers Banter Archive May 21 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


21 May 2012 23:14:51
I'm getting a bit sick of the half apology by Rangers fans, "Yes we deserved punishment but how are these sanctions fair?" Given that the judgement was made with the quote "only match fixing would have been more serious." (A punishment then endorsed by another panel and another judge). I now give you the opportunity to say exactly what "fitting" sanctions you would have applied and accepted under that damning verdict, I don't want to hear a word about guilt/nonguilt, the verdict is passed in that regard, just merely thoughts on the punishment, Rangers fans, bias or otherwise, the floor is yours...

Believable20 Unbelievable4

If you dont like what RANGERS fans are saying on the RANGERS rumours site mate then jump on another one. Simples. They are entitled to say what they like (within reason) as are you. Dont come on here expressing your disgust when you can just as easily visit another site. Catch my drift?

Agree15 Disagree14

Now that the season is over, i think a new realisation is dawning. the rangers apologists in the press are now looking foolish ,at least. terry butcher needs rangers ? of course he does. sandy jardine needs rangers ? of course he does. its becoming clearer what has gone on here and the scale of it is just breathtaking. there will be no rangers in the spl next year. the fans of the spl clubs will not have it. there is a groundswell rising and not just across the city. the people of this country are not taking kindly to the robbery which has been committed against them by this football club. i cant believe the number of hard working tax paying rangers supporters who are going along with this criminality. wake up and take control of this.

Agree14 Disagree4

@1

" They are entitled to say what they like "
" Dont come on here expressing your disgust"

Isn't expressing his disgust a case of him saying what he likes ?

jimi88

Agree13 Disagree7

This is the OP, to 1) I wasn't just talking about reading Rangers fans indignation solely in here, I was talking phone-in's, newspapers, Rangers fans I know etc etc. To date I have always found here a reasonably sane place to encourage debate, I have many, many posts in here that Rangers fans have agreed with. Oh and by the way "a bit sick of" and disgust are not the same thing but remarkably (yet again) still no answer on what would have been "fitting" sanctions. It's like nailing custard to a wall getting an answer to that perfectly reasonable question.

Agree2 Disagree2

@OP.
I personally do not feel any "guilt" or otherwise. Emarrassed ..yes, to the extent of having been conned as a supporter for thirty eight years.
Embarrassed by the actions of a few corrupt businessmen. Spitting blood at the fact that a reknowned and knighted individual threw our football club to the wolves,to save his own skin,and business empire.
If you consider this as an excuse,then fine,"guilty" as charged. But you did open up the floor. As for the punishment..I'd go for the procedures and protocols that are in existence at the start of each season,not retrospective punishments.
@2
What have the Rangers fans to take control of exactly?
In case it has escaped your philasophical/blinkered.. analytical/biased mindset,RFC are in ADMINISTRATION.
WHEN and IF we find out who is backing Mr Green,IF they hang around,WHAT their proposals are, WHEN we find out the results of the various investigations,reports,and sanctions.
IF and WHEN a share issue is proposed we will be ready support it.
Then, and only then, we will be in a stronger position to "take control" of our own thought processes.
Previously O.B.

Agree1 Disagree1

@3: and if the 'crime' has never been committed in the Scottish game before, and if the punishments in place already were not deemed sufficient, should there be no punishment?

Agree2 Disagree1

We do agree and we have answered several times what we think are reasonable punishment.Difference is the only punishment you lot think is reasonable is no more rangers and guess what m8 we aint going to agree with u on that one.

Agree2 Disagree2

OP again, @ 5, and 7 for that matter. I agree that the SFA/SPL did not have some of the rules in place, one noticeable exemption being a quarterly check on PAYE which the English leagues have but like every body, every regulatory force, sometimes things come along that haven't been foreseen, some should be, PAYE checks was a no-brainer for me but even the US Constitution has AMENDMENTS and that is what the current fiasco at Ibrox has uncovered. The constant evolving of how clubs pay players etc has led to archaic laws looking just that, archaic. It needed changing, moreso because it involves a big club and an unprecedented level of debt in the Scottish game. For the record 5 you stated existing rules and punishments would have been fine, I presume this includes the 10 pts deduction for going into administration and therefore quashes any possibility of a tainted title? Also Dundee had a player embargo, so no problem with that either I presume?

Agree2 Disagree0

O.P. #5 here.
Read my post, i answered your question.
Not the answer you were looking for?
Previously O.B.

Agree0 Disagree1

OP for 7, not for one minute have I wanted Rangers buried, I've been to too many OF games to not want to see more, the fan base etc etc will keep Rangers alive but if you add up all potential misdemeanours this whole thing has uncovered a minor wrist slap won't suffice. As some older Gers will remember from 65 to 86 Rangers teams, good and bad won 2 titles, the prospect of a moderate team for several seasons now surely cant be that unpalatable or is it winning at all costs now that matters? And please don't come up with the non-competitive league nonsense, Celtic during the Rangers nine in a row were a shambles. You won those 9 leagues by an average of just under 7 pts a season. Beating Celtic over the same time period by 99 points, bear in mind the bulk of those seasons were 2 pts a win. So I'll take with a pinch of salt any Rangers fears of a non-competitive league due to any forthcoming further sanctions.

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolutely the answer I was looking for, thankyou.

Agree0 Disagree0

OP yes they punishments were fine.But we want our punishment delivered swiftly not drag on and on until the spl sfa figure out whats best for them.We want 2 go to the 3rd div because then hopefully all the bigots who follow our club will dissappear and let the descent fans get back to the football side.Now i know u dont like anyone slagging of your lot but it means we get away from your lot aswell.Playing down in div3 would be a breathe of fresh air.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 feel free to slag off Celtic, I called them a shambles in post 10 so I think I can take it. I totally agree with you on the punishments but lets face it 1) whatever they decide they have to be sure they are on a sound legal footing 2) with Whyte's expertise at muddying the waters this could take ages to get to the bottom of and finally 3) the SFA and SPL have the potential no win situation of hammering Rangers and others suffer or letting it go and becoming a laughing stock. I don't have the answer to their dilemma, few of us thinking rationally really will, whatever team we support. But sure I do sympathise with the long term endurance of this decent Rangers fans have been subjected to.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 May 2012 22:56:43
Rangers are only still here because of the fans filling out the stadium raising 1m+ a fortnight, and the players taking cuts. With all these new admin and newco sanctions on clubs, just wait till till the next team in the spl goes into admin. They have no chance.

Believable13 Unbelievable7

21 May 2012 18:13:56

SPL chief exec Neil Doncaster says he's not sure why such a distinction is being drawn between cva and newco exit from admin.

ND: "Newcos have been allowed in Uk football for many years. Typically way businesses in general escape administration."

ND: "punishing clubs for entering admin, when then they achieve sporting advantage, they should receive sporting penalty, seems logical."

Overwhelming fans reaction has been to oppose newco. Is that because creditors have no choice in matter, unlike cva.

So there you have it Celtic fans, newco has been around for years in the U.K. clubs don't lose history. As for the company number Leeds don't have the same company number they were formed with yet are still the same club.


Here is a c&p of Leeds utd 2 companiy numbers old and new.

Leeds New Co company number 05765697

Leeds Old Co company number 05334247

If anyone wants to check this out go on the companies house website, it's all in black and white on there.

Believable4 Unbelievable10

Every newo has agreed a cva - english f.a law is different to sfa.
they must pay all football related debts in full as per football creditor rule. this does not apply in scotland.

Agree1 Disagree0

WOW, after everything your club has done and is going through you would think you would wait to see what happens. instead any little bit of news that could be good for yous you come on and say there you go. first off stop bringing Celtic into everything(and trust that we care more about our club and how great it is and how PROUD of a history we have for we are heading in the right direction and up to way bigger things then your club) and second you should be alot more carefull with your words because you look like an idiot. he never said anything along the lines of you will keep your history, the word "could" seems to escape your mind and what it really means. how much of the broom is left because by now with all the clutching at the straws i would think there is nothing left to wipe up any logic.
as you start to celebrate(wait till tmr when it seems somehting new comes out to damper yous) dont forget that there are alot more things coming out and at the level it seems yous have been cheating, then surley there is nothing to stop yous from losing your club/history.however if you do keep it then you can be know as the biggest cheats/corrupt/worse (and it goes on) club in football history...so enjoy that one, would you still be proud or want that history?

Agree12 Disagree4

Doncaster is wrong. english and scottish law differs. actually for an sfa official to quote an english example is ridiculous. as far as football is concerned england is as foreign as lithuania. he should be careful, fifa might see a way to unite the national sides if he carries on spouting garbage like this. as for rangers history, it now contains the misappropriation of tax, n.i. an vat due to her majesty's revenue and customs which was deducted from employees wages. thought you might like to get that removed.

Agree3 Disagree1

@3
Three thing's i would want removed are the debt..and Two titles..
"Murray" park, and
"The Rangers FC Group Ltd"
Previously Optimistic bear

Agree0 Disagree1

@OP...im poster #2 and was just wondering as i said what till tmr when something else comes out...well looks like one of your major war chest funding person has walked out and was just wondering are you still braggin? for how long do you think it will take until green even is gone and no one is there to help yous, cause looks more and more like liq and no club or history....waiting for your reply on how today is tasteing for you?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 May 2012 20:38:22
See Alex Thomson at it again with news of a mystery bidder that duff and duffer never considered. Might be nonsense but still not convinced by the green consortium. Obviously hoping I am wrong

Believable6 Unbelievable2

The ed on the sceptic site is talking about Valls Capital Ltd?????

Agree0 Disagree2

Looks pretty convincing. Either way it should have been properly explode by d & p. VERY WORRYING INDEED

Agree4 Disagree0

Probably on the wind up. CheltBlue

Agree0 Disagree1

21 May 2012 20:25:04
For the person who said rangers youth players are good enough well I belive that rangers came 5th in the under 19s this season which you think is good enough to play in rangers first team?

Believable12 Unbelievable1

Counts for nothing. Pointless argument. How come Celtic's youth players aren't good enough to get into the first team even though they won the u19 league?

Rangers and Celtic's youth set-up leaves a lot to be desired.

TTG

Agree1 Disagree5

Ya your right for we didnt win the youngster of the year which came from our youth team eh, or have 3-4 players play in the first team this season. how many have yous used? not trying to start somthing but just needed to open your eyes a wee bit since you dont take notice or fail to reconize how good of an overall team Celtic have.

Agree3 Disagree1

@1, ??????
maybe the first team has just won the premier league ?
on a serious note. i watched both legs of airdrie v dumbarton play off on alba. didnt understand a word of the commentary ,to my shame, ( my great grandmother couldnt speak english, only gaelic). but i thouroughly enjoyed it. dumbartons ground must be in the most picturesque setting in the uk. there were some pretty hardened old pros and some good young players in those games and with all due respect i doubt any team of u19s would beat either of them, never mind the spl. there is no chance of a youth team coming anywhere other than last in the spl.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 May 2012 20:07:18
Why are the sfa waiting to vote on sanctions for a newco, could it be to try and hump the gers no matter what, or am I being mental here, surely if newco's are the "most common way business's come out from administration" that would mean there is no sanctions to date, but because some people involved with rangers have screwed the system, somehow a brand new company, with let's be honest no history except that in our memories, must pay the price for 1,2,3,4 years after being created, tell you what the next club to go tits up is utterly screwed

Believable4 Unbelievable0

If there were no sanctions, all the other clubs would spend way beyond their means then liquidate. There has to be a deterrent.

Agree6 Disagree2

The unfortunate fact is newcos are happening day in day out and people are being conned. What should be looked at, is the hypocrisy of mr murray, a total disgrace as a man and his puppet, whyte. Where are the the authorities with these shysters, probably lookimg for sectarian singers.

Agree3 Disagree0

So no other team has liquidated then returned as a newco ever before in the history of the sfa and that's why they will be magicaly taking it to a vote now, at the end of a season, are you trying not to see logic where it clearly exists, I'm not saying rfc should be above the law, but it wouldn't be rfc anymore so how can it legally be enforced, sins of the father springs to mind

Agree0 Disagree2

21 May 2012 17:01:33
Billionaire businessman Donald Trump “walked away” from a deal to buy Rangers Football Club.

Trump, who is building a golf course and resort at the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire, backed out of investing in the Ibrox side because of the depth of the club’s financial problems.

A source close to Trump told the Press and Journal: “We looked seriously and walked away.

“It just did not make sense to us, although they are a great club.

Believable7 Unbelievable8

21 May 2012 17:25:17
ive saw more posts about cva's than watp lol

lenny

Believable8 Unbelievable2

@lenny

Of course there is . A CVA and a mystery 200m buyer are the only 2 ways RFC can avoid liquidation . No buyer is stupid enough to burn 100's of millions on a club that can't get a licence to play football .
As for the CVA , some , not all , posters on here need a reality check . Green says he'll put 8.5m in the pot for the CVA . That's 8.5p in the pound on a 100m debt . Liquidation , followed by an asset sale (20m for Asbestos Towers , 5m for Sir David's superstar creating training facilities ) would raise 25m for creditors .
HMRC and ticketus have been stiffened for a combined 40m (NOT including the big tax case ) , therefore , their choice is this.......

Vote for a CVA - Roughly 3.5 m repaid
Vote for Liquidation - Roughly 10m repaid

No CVA No RFC - No brainer , ain't it .

jimi88

Agree11 Disagree4

@1 I really don't know how many times this has been said but the assets of Rangers have already been bought for £8.5m that is the bid that has been accepted by the administrators from Green and co, what part of unconditional bid do you fans not understand?

The creditors will get £8.5m if its a newco and £8.5m if it's a cva, Rangers and it's assets have been up for sale since Feb this year and the best bid so far has been £11m so where you get £25m from is anyones guess?

Go back and read the article on the day Greens bid was accepted, Rangers will try for a cva if that fails Green will start a newco and all assets will be bought by his group and the money given to creditors. After that Shares in Rangers plc 1899 are worthless so Green wont need them.

CVA is worth the exact same as liquidation of Rangers plc 1899 company.

Agree1 Disagree3

@2

Your entire post is utter nonsense

RFC's assets have not been sold ..... Do some research
The creditors have been OFFERED 8.5m ,the CVA depends on them voting to accept it . Voting date - 6th June , hence no sale so far ...... Do some research
The best bid wasnt even considered ....... Do some research
The creditors will get 25m from the fire sale , thrice as much as the CVA
The 25m comes from the sale of the stadium and training facilities once the club is liquidated

When the club is liquidated it has no debt , so why would the new , different club pay 8.5m of the old , extinction bound RFC's debt ?

You have absolutely no idea what is going on , despite everything you've been told here , being freely available online .

Shame on you

jimi88

Agree5 Disagree2

Think we're arguing apples and oranges here. Until the SFA/SPL come up with a Newco policy, all the talk is just speculation.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 May 2012 16:02:51
Stv have announced that the financial advisor to the consortium is Imram Ahmed, and that one of the consortium is Javed Abdullah. Imram Ahmed while at Allenby Capitol Ltd , who are brokers for Weather Lottery (biased in Doncaster) provided rangers with online betting & lotto services 2010 .in court ibrox claim that the Doncaster gambling buisiness owed £30000 in unpaid profits. Additionally two of Weather lotterys employees were found guilty of fraud with the loss of£789,000 in July of 2011.
You couldn't make this lot up . Anyone who seems to be connected to the finances of rangers seem to all have very colourfull back grounds. This is also unique that an individual who is the financial advisor to a company , which was sued by a company is now involved with the takeover of a stricken company.
This seems toget worse and worse by the day.
Suicidal.

Believable12 Unbelievable3

Most business men have a 'colourful' background but are not under the microscope in the way anyone connected to Rangers are right now.

Agree4 Disagree9

21 May 2012 15:43:39
not sure if last reply reached. agree with ed 14 that crewe hav almost or hav signd boy fi crewe for around 4m but can see why rangers would b interested. as for the french and dutch guys...when a lookd them up on net it says they are 17. if that is rhe case surely rangers can sign them? my understanding was rangers cany sign players 18 or over? can you clear this up ed14? also if it is the case we can. sign young laddies like this then a would b happy as being realistic its going to be a few seasons till we back in europe

Believable1 Unbelievable0

RFC cannot register any players over the age of 18 for the next 2 transfer windows

Existing squad members , over 18yrs , can have their contracts extended .
Free agents , loan deals , amateurs or whatever situation a player is in , CANNOT sign for RFC if they are over 18 .

Agree0 Disagree0

21 May 2012 13:43:02
The extent of Rangers cheating Scottish and European clubs to be revealed on Panorama, BBC 1 on Wednesday. Mr Doncaster has had an advanced screening and his due to make an emergency statement today.

If failing to pay tax obligations was just short of the most serious punishment we'll see what the outcome of this is.

Believable7 Unbelievable7

This is all hearsay.nobody has seen it.

Agree2 Disagree2

Wow! Don't you have any other interests in your life. Rangers...Panorama...boring!

Agree2 Disagree3

Codswallop from another sheep. No such statement from Doncaster. In fact Doncaster tonight implied Rangers had already been punished by being docked 10 pts.Can't you lot think for yourself ?

Agree3 Disagree3

@2: I'm pretty sure many Rangers fans will be watching on Wednesday night. Will that make them boring too?

Agree3 Disagree1

21 May 2012 15:09:06
A scenario;

Rangers CVA refused, liquidation and newCo only route open. SPL votes against allowing Rangers into the SPL, a vote by the 11 members clubs, as it should be!

IMO the first thing the other clubs will do is agree to a new voting structure.

You can bet the next thing they will do is vote to share SPL gate receipts.

Believable2 Unbelievable5

No chance that would go through .sharing gate receipts .

Agree2 Disagree1

Share gate receipts? If thats the end game only old firm fans have something to lose. If accurate Celtic will never willingly let us fall. I dont believe that will happen, (gate receipts) but I firmly believe the tv money should be shared equally. CheltBlue

Agree2 Disagree0

The spl won't vote against Rangers, heck even Celtic are trying to sell season tickets on the basis of games against Rangers next season (look at their website small print), so far only Hibs have came out against a newco. 4 others have came out and said they need Rangers money or they could go bust.

Won't even come to a newco vote imho if hmrc were against the cva plans they would have shot them to bits by now in public, they've had 10 days now to make any remarks about this but have said nothing. Rangers will have to pay back all paye/vat owed over the next 3-5 years and will do a cva for btc, ticketus will chase Whyte for the money they are owed to them as Rangers don't have it. 18 months from now Rangers stronger than ever winning the spl again.

Agree1 Disagree4

Every chance if there isn't a Rangers, Celtic won't have their blocking partner and will be isolated during a vote. Integrity, aye right. Long overdue .

Agree0 Disagree1

@3: I think you'll find they'd only go bust without Rangers if they tried to run their clubs as they are now - if they downsized and cut their cloth accordingly, they'd be fine.

Agree3 Disagree0

@5 the only way they could downsize is part time footballers. CheltBlue

Agree0 Disagree1

@6: only if they wanted to continue paying wages pro rata to what they have now. They'd just have to pay less for full-time - clubs in the first division manage to have full-time players after all.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 May 2012 15:03:29
Donald Trump has revealed that he was seriously looking at buying Rangers but decided to walk away. If only... But, on the other hand, I think that Green's consortium is brilliant. It's the transfer embargo holding us back now, as well as trying for a CVA very late (although a CVA is a great option, with it being so late it may not work).

Simon_RFC

Believable4 Unbelievable4

If someone owed you £100 and offered you £8,would you accept or liquidate them? What if this company had cheated tax? Would you walk away?

Agree4 Disagree4

Good point but if it was 2m or nothing then what?

Agree2 Disagree2

21 May 2012 14:38:30
I see that Donald Trump's spokesperson says that Trump considered bidding for Rangers.

Surely the people of Aberdeen hate him enough already - Jaxie

Believable5 Unbelievable1

He should buy Aberdeen.

Agree0 Disagree2

21 May 2012 10:10:32
Iam a serious thinker,
Someone posted that national team not qualified for a tournament since spl formed in 1998,
My counter to that is we have had 2 uefa cup finals,last 16 of champs lge,& scotland won cup,
Me personaly would like to see a 2 leage system in scotland everybody play eachother twice,3 up 3 down,
I think it would see better sponsership all round,help make more of a competition,
1,6 in championship are epl ready,if not more,

Believable4 Unbelievable3

I was the one who raised the fact that Scotland had not qualified for a major tournament since SPL formed and you are right to point out about uefa cup finals etc but this was done with teams full of foreigners i was trying to point out that the SPL may be having a detrimental effect on youth development after all pre SPL Rangers,Celtic,Dundee Utd and Aberdeen had European success with teams made up of predominately home grown players.

Lochaber Bear

Agree3 Disagree0

I would agree with that. I think it would improve the standard of football abit with the lower teams. Also what about a playoff for the third spot just like in championship. Generates extra money for those clubs and adds a bit of interest into the lower teams. Final would get air time on tv.
Don

Agree0 Disagree0

2 leagues of 18 pro teams. More than enough with the limited audience in Scotland. Either teams merge or drop to part-time football. Change to a summer league and try to grow the brand. The SPL and SFL need to think outside the box and give up trying to compete with bigger league structures. All IMO of course. CheltBlue

Agree2 Disagree0

Lochaber bear i know what your saying mate but 6 of our starting eleven in the final were scottish and we finished with 7 scots on the pitch that day pal....and if i remember correctly when we made the last 16 of the champions league a certain Ross Macormack scored the goal against porto to put us through...so IMO I dont think we have really hurt the national team that much in the last 6 to 10 years the advocaat years were the ones that didnt help our national team on our front...

Tam-Sir 1873

Agree0 Disagree0

21 May 2012 10:08:34
Donald Trump considered buying Rangers. haha. That's the bfunniest part of this saga yet. Even the man who is well known for throwing his money around didn't want to invest because of the state of the club's finances. I do feel that he would have just use the club as a PR platform to prop up his invasion into Scottish culture.

Believable3 Unbelievable5

21 May 2012 07:10:50
Phone tap report from 2001, was Murray involved.


Daily Record Story from Jan 2001

Byline: Colin Wilson

chief executive Allan MacDonald was at the centre of a bugging alert yesterday after a listening device was found at his home.

The surveillance equipment capable of listening into his phone conversations was uncovered after the Parkhead club called in espionage experts.

They were ordered to electronically sweep the homes of senior executives at the club for bugs in an astonishing security operation.

Mr MacDonald, who is standing down today after a turbulent spell in charge of Celtic, confirmed the checks uncovered an illegal receiver.

It was immediately reported to the Home Office.

He said: “Signals from a receiving device in the vicinity of my home were found. No-one can say if it was being used to listen into my phone conversations but it would have been capable of doing so.

“I was surprised, but not greatly, since I had known for some time that someone had been tapping into my mobile phone to listen into my messages.”

The experts in industrial espionage industrial espionage

Acquisition of trade secrets from business competitors. Industrial spying is a reaction to the efforts of many businesses to keep secret their designs, formulas, manufacturing processes, research, and future plans. called in by Celtic reported the unlicensed receiving device to the Home Office after uncovering its signal in or near Mr MacDonald’s home in Edinburgh.

The bug could have been set up in a nearby home or in a car parked outside.

The Home Office refused to discuss the investigation into the bug, which was found about five months ago.

But one source suggested MI5 agents would routinely be alerted to any evidence of unauthorised electronic eavesdropping Secretly gaining unauthorized access to confidential communications. Examples include listening to radio transmissions or using laser interferometers to reconstitute conversations by reflecting laser beams off windows that are vibrating in synchrony to the sound in the room. .

The discovery has prompted speculation of a dirty tricks dirty tricks campaign being waged against Celtic.

Mr MacDonald refused to guess who might have been using the receiver.

He said: “Concerns about industrial esponiage were first aired when Fergus McCann is a Scottish-born Canadian businessman and entrepreneur.

McCann’s wealth stemmed initially from a golf vacation company, based in Montreal and Phoenix, Arizona. He is best known for his involvement in Celtic F.C., the football club based in Glasgow, Scotland.

“There was a certain amout of paranoia that apparently private conversations were somehow getting into the public domain.

“There were never any listening devices found at the stadium .

“But the fact that it was felt necessary to sweep my home only underlines the unease at the club about how information was being obtained by others.”

Believable14 Unbelievable2

If DM has been up to these tricks, and it looks increasingly like he has, it way way beyond a joke. I'm a 'tic man, this type of behaviour was done by an individual not Rangers. Let's hope he gets what's coming to him for what he's done to both clubs.

Agree6 Disagree0

Oh dear.Celtic paranoia again? Well no,cz they found a device.

Agree3 Disagree4

Were the media involved looking for stories from McDonald?

Agree1 Disagree0

Most likely the good old news of the world,mark daley trying very hard to create as much scandal as possible to gain publicity for his documentary,theres no need for one club to be tapping another clubs phone regarding transfer targets when agents are touting their players to the highest bidder.mr daley is dropping his wee bits of scandal to anyone who'll listen to try and boost his viewing figures.

Agree3 Disagree4

I have heard the BBC have documents from Murrays failed Newspaper, The Sunday Scot, a Private detective was used to listen in on Celtic so the Newspaper would be first with every breaking news story from Parkhead, thus making the paper an overnight success in the west coast for both half of the old firm as Murray would also have news from Rangers straight from the horses mouth, the bug found put a stop to news leaks from Celtic and The Sunday Scot folded after 14 weeks.

Agree3 Disagree0

Pmsl, where's Clark Kent when you need him. You guys are truly the masters of conspiracy.

Agree1 Disagree3

21 May 2012 06:39:19
The celtic tax experts on here really are making stuff up as they go along, just thought i would clear a few things up with this post.

1) Green and co have already signed a letter of intent to buy all Rangers assets in the event that a cva is turned down, no one else can now buy Ibrox or mp unless Green has a get out clause.

2) As long as 75% of the creditors who are owed money (likely hmrc) accept a cva then no other creditor by law can do anything about it, Ticketus,Whyte or whoever have no real say in the matter.

3) Rangers are not just disputing penalties on btc but the case itself, if this case went on which it wont now and if the club was found to have used ebts in the wrong way a second stage would be put into action to find how much extra penalties would be payable, the most the FTT can fine Rangers is £24m. FTT stands for First tier tribunal which would then lead on to STT Second tier tribunal.

4) The alleged phone hacking even if true which i very much doubt has nothing to do with spl,sfa or uefa these bodies have no rules on phone hacking, if such a thing went on it would be for the individuals and the police to take action on this matter it has zero to do with Rangers fc, please tax experts copy and paste the sfa rules on phone hacking if such a thing exists??

5) Rangers fc will still be called Rangers fc next season no matter what happens, newco is the preferred route out of admin for a lot of English clubs and they have not lost any history see Leeds utd Charlton athletic as cases in point.

Believable11 Unbelievable13

On point No2, wrong, completely the opposite. If one creditor is owed more than 25% of the money, they can block a CVA no matter what the others want. Source - Douglas Fraser, BBC Scotland Business & Economy editor on BBC Scotland Sportsound 4th May 2012; "...and there's a blockage on a CVA of anybody who's got more than 25%, if they don't like the look of it, they can block the CVA ...".
Just been listening to the podcast by pure chance and typed what he said verbatim. I'm not a tax expert, but I do listen to what's happening in Scottish football. Maybe you should do the same.
Al

Agree4 Disagree2

Keep burying your head and telling yourself thats true.1# Dave King claims he has first claim on Whytes shares,long legal battle ahead? 2# It is 75% of the cash value of the creditors so ticketus and HMRC are well in the frame.3# Rangers have accepted that 24m is due.They are disputing fines and penalties,why would murray try and cut a deal for 12m last year?4#If the phone hacking turns out to be fact,and the hacker was acting on behalf or rangers then your club is right in the frame 5# If you go newco thru liquidation you cannot be called the same name as the oldco as your company number will be different,and thats all companies are known as.

Agree4 Disagree2

There are no SFA rules on phone hacking because the SFA has never had need to have rules. however they may have rules about serious criminal activity bringing the game into disrepute.

Agree3 Disagree0

@1 there is only one creditor owed 75% of the debt and that is hmrc as ticketus are out the picture as they have been told their contract has been terminated,they are now pursuing cw who gave his personal surities for the loan

Agree1 Disagree2

100% correct.
If HMRC agree a CVA, a CVA it is.
Rangers ''do not'' owe Ticketus any money....However, we do owe Whyte 18m that he paid the bank, but he owes Ticketus 26m, that they have already raised an action for, and started initial proceedings.
As soon as they done that, they aknowledged that the debt was Whytes not Rangers.
Some might say that they will chase Whyte for the difference......Not the case, because they have started proceedings now, which intimates that they know the debt is Whytes.
It's simple....Gers v HMRC, Agree!, and its basically as you were, don't agree and its a Newco.....simples!

Agree1 Disagree1

21 May 2012 04:39:08
celtic fan coming in peace

listen lads im in the same business as mr whyte.

it was not his fault club is potentially collapsing

it is on hindsight i believe that MR MURRAY, should be held accountable for deceiving the hardworking blue collar man, who pays xy and z to their season ticket duty.

fight this with all your pride. ur heritage should never be compromised due to bad financial management

Believable17 Unbelievable1

 
Change Consent