Rangers Banter Archive April 24 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


24 Apr 2012 23:38:40
traynor says it best...


RANGERS supporters were apoplectic last night and threatening all sorts of reprisals after an SFA independent inquiry found their club guilty of serious breaches.

The Ibrox club have been fined £160,000 and banned from signing any players older than 18 for a whole year.


The financial penalty is bad enough for a club that's just about penniless but the transfer sanction could be a killer. Make no mistake, this is a punishment which could finish Rangers off.

They are certain to lose players at the end of the season - in return for massive wage cuts players negotiated new clauses in their contracts which will make their departures easy - but won't be able to replace them.

Paul Murray and Bill Miller would be raving mad to buy Rangers with that restriction attached and, in fact, both are reconsidering the wisdom of getting involved with such a stricken, seemingly God forsaken club.

Rangers have lurched from one crisis to another but last night's brutal news could lead to the Ibrox doors being padlocked.

And all because of Craig Whyte, who was hit with a £200,000 fine and given a lifetime suspension from Scottish football. Sadly, his ban comes a year too late.

Last night, as they fermented and agonised it was difficult to work out who Rangers' fans wanted to hit out against first and most.

The SFA? Certainly but what about Whyte, who thinks he believes he should have a seat for life in the Ibrox directors' box?

If he's smart he'll think again on that but if he was thinking at all last night when he heard the verdicts it wasn't about the club he has all but ruined.

"Tell me how it is going to affect me? I couldn't care less," he said. "It makes no difference to my life whatsoever - and good luck collecting the money. It's a joke.

"It is very harsh on Rangers. I am surprised at how harsh the SFA have been on a club which is going through tough times at the moment.

"Stewart Regan (chief executive) and Campbell Ogilvie (president) should resign and get out of Scottish football.

"The SFA want to kick Rangers when they are down and I hope people remember that. They are playing to the media."

Whyte's response was cold and crass and ignored completely the fact that he more than anyone is responsible for the hurt and the trauma being visited upon this club.

Of course David Murray reigned during a period of wild indulgence spending money on players the club couldn't afford and the full impact of that folly has yet to be felt.

The verdict on the EBT case hasn't been announced but the damage could be as much as £60m.

Even so, Rangers were not in danger of insolvency when Whyte took over last May.

The bank debt was down at £18m but Whyte's refusal to pay bills, especially those due to HMRC, pushed the club to the edge of the abyss.

Last night's verdict from the SFA's independent hearing, however, threatens to tip Rangers over the edge into liquidation.

Be in no doubt that's how serious these fresh sanctions are and the ban on signing players for 12 months could be the final nail in the coffin.

This is a hellish development for Rangers and certainly the two remaining bidders, Murray and Miller, were re-assessing after recovering from the shock of the latest punishments.

Rangers will appeal the verdict but they had already been convinced their arguments against punishments would make Lord William Nimmo Smith and his panel realise there was only one person to blame.

Yet, Rangers and their manager Ally McCoist have been battered more than Whyte himself.

The SFA's hearing just might have made Rangers worthless and their fans are entitled to be bemused and angry. They are also justified in feeling they and their club have been abused as well as abandoned by many in the Scottish game.

There has been a disturbing level of glee over Rangers' plight. Among fans of other clubs, fair enough. But inside boardrooms?

The timing of the announcement by the SFA took most people by surprise and although the hearing was entirely independent surely Nimmo Smith and his colleagues must have been aware the club's administration process had reached a delicate stage.

This is not to suggest they should have avoided doing what they believed to be correct and fair but they might just have called time on an ancient club.

And if sanctions imposed by them lead to the closure of Rangers because bidders walk away, the gentlemen who sat in judgment must also accept their part in the club's demise, if liquidation flows.

Nimmo Smith and Co won't be in the same hall of shame as Whyte and Murray, who sold the club to a charlatan, but they'll have played their part.

As will the SFA and SPL, who have aways given the impression that they have been more interested in punishment than rehabilitation.

And it's the innocents who will suffer. Rangers' fans have been a disgrace in the past but the tens of thousands of decent people who support this club don't deserve what's happening to them right now.

And it could get worse depending on the outcome of the SPL's meeting on Monday.

The top-flight clubs will consider other heavy sanctions to be imposed should Rangers now slip into liquidation but just how many times are they to be kicked while on their knees?

The authorities are in danger of leaving themselves open to accusations of bloodlust and Rangers' fans will never forgive them. Nor should they
theweeprimeminister

Believable6 Unbelievable5

So the clubs rangers work with want rangers dead,what next we cant continue working with these clubs
honestly would you work with people who want you dead?
we must move for our own safety
its a must,if we have to have something to support and follow we cant just cant do it here know.......les

Agree1 Disagree4

Long winded,suffice to say Rangers are guilty as charged,no signing anyone means nothing as you have no money anyway,if rules were applied fairly it should have been the 3rd division

Dannybhoy

Agree1 Disagree1

We will never forget these last few weeks and who has been putting the boot in. Yes i agree, punishment should be meted out to Rangers but also rehabillitation should go hand in hand as well. The latter does not appear to be happening, and those in positions of power are not helping our situation and are imposing draconian measures being made 'ad-hoc'. The timing of sanctions by the SFA is helping to nail the coffin shut - it will impact on potential buyers, and if they had any sense they'd stay away. If the SFA want us liquidated, then they may have just got their wish by their actions.

Agree4 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 23:25:22
why dont people get the picture here...its not the 12 month penalty or the fine...its the timing of this that hurts us more than anything.....we dont expect to be pampered here but they have put a serious dent in a takeover......best way to respond would be to take the sensible route....come back as strong as we can under the circumstances..
theweeprimeminister

Believable6 Unbelievable2

Joke there is no takeover its all smoke and mirrors and no ones fault but Rangers and more directly David Murray,if you must vent your anger at someone start there

Agree1 Disagree1

Do you think there would have been any deal before this investigation was finnished? You have at least 2 other investigations pending and the big tax case. Nodeal will go ahead untill there are declared. SFA have done you a favour by getting this out a s quickly as possible. The only people unhappy should be D&P who are trying to spin this out and the two "bidders" who are basically just full of Bull and are doing PR while the wait for the corpse to cool.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 23:13:41
Heard ticketus moving for outright control themselves, battle for survival will be between them and hmrc. Hmrc win btc we cease to exist. Ticketus, as i hav said all along are the key, but now look our only hope!

Believable0 Unbelievable4

I will never step inside ibrox again if they take over.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 23:12:11
Heres a few steps that the wounded bears club should have excepted..Recognization..Admition..Then start to Examine past errors..Make amends for them..Help out others who have suffered& finally ..Learn to live a new life by the code of hounour every one else has too!!!!!!stevo

Believable6 Unbelievable4

Here is a few steps on how to win a treble , dont let your bottle crash

Agree5 Disagree4

Heres, a few steps to stayin alive,don,t cheat, pay your tax,es, have some dignity,man up,say sorry,etc, etc,garlar07

Agree3 Disagree2

Here's a few steps about dignity
a. Keep your pitbull manager under control and away from officials.
b. Keep him well away from twitter.
c. Keep him in the stands.
d. Be gracious in defeat.

Agree4 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 23:06:23
Why dont Rangers supporters clubs start hassling former players and board members to pay back their EBT loans and see how much these guys, that kiss the jersey, love their former club.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 22:31:52
ase if 1 in 5 gave £1,000 job done. I
would gladly give £1,000 to save my
team.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Not while Craig tight still has shares

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 22:20:12
i cant understand why rangers fans ,want to bhoycot all away matches ,and withdraw there support for the scottish national team,could someone please explain the logic behind this.

Believable4 Unbelievable4

If you can't work it out, then we wasting time trying to explain it.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 22:18:09
If Rangers have a 12 months transfer embargo then they simply can not allow their players to play for Scotland, not for petty reasons, more to do with the fact a player could get injured playing for Scotland , meaning we could suffer further. Imagine one of our players got a 3 month injury whilst on Scotland duty. Will the S.F.A lift the embargo ? Not a chance, so it's simples we can not allow any of our players to play for Scotland. {Ed001's Note - the club would receive compensation, as well as the SFA covering his wages while out injured. It might actually help!}

Believable3 Unbelievable2

I could never turn my back on the national team if I was a player, just doesn't sit well with me. I don't really understand the likes of Steven fletcher who spat the dummy out and refuses to play for his country but that's the problem with today's players who are given bloated disgusting pay checks and forget about everything else and unfortunately that mentality filters through to some idiotic fans in the stand, our players should turn their backs on Scotland? Shame on you!

Andy

Agree1 Disagree1

What of the player wants to play for his country how are u going to stop them they will leave if thts the case more than likely

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 22:16:19
Reading all you bears predicting doom
and gloom for Scottish football..
"no Rangers, no tv deal, coefficient
plummets, crowds dwindle.. etc..
Well how about this as a counter argument
Dundee Utd, Motherwell, Hearts do
well in Europa League and all get
to group stages...coefficient rises
Celtic get to group stages of Champions
League 4 years in a row minimum £50m
(based on £12.5m each year)
SPL thrives and crowds come back
no trouble at any games, no Rangers
fans = no trouble...
Celtic with euro money bring in top
class players as do other teams
competing in europe..
SKY sports INCREASE tv money as
product now so much better..
Timalloy

Believable5 Unbelievable8

Dhimalloy...when will you realise that no scottish team is going to make it to the champs league group stages for the forseeable future. Wake up man... Billy the bear...W.A.T.P...

Agree6 Disagree5

Aye cause thats going to happen and celtic fans say rangers fans live in a dream world.

BigBear

Agree5 Disagree3

And then you come down off your high....keep smoking the daft stuff, your posts get funnier and funnier.

Agree4 Disagree3

What do you mean no trouble at any games is it just rangers fans that start or is involved in any trouble at games, this is getting beyond a joke, away back to your own page and keep smoking the bad stuff.
3rd division here we Come and loving it, we'll see how you all get on without us
Watp

Andy

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 22:27:12
Why are you all greeting at your punishment from the SFA, you got off lightly for god's sake. Cheaters cannit be allowed to thrive and you have been cheating for too long on the field and off the field. Add to that the help you've recieved on a regular basis from the establishment refs and you really need to stop ur greeting. Celtic have been at a disadvantage for years because of all of the above but have still gained success. Grow a set and welcome to our world. Now who's paranoid, !!.........martyc1888

Believable4 Unbelievable7

Get a grip mate, what proof is there that refs are against celtic? where as we are not paranoid we just think that the ban on transfers is ridiculous. If this was Celtic it was happening to then you would be spouting rubbish about how the illuminati are out to get yae(Or something along those lines)

Mr Blonde

Agree4 Disagree3

Refs have been proven to be against Celtic - Dougie McDonald anyone? You don't have any money to buy players so whats the big deal. You have to pay off the 200+ companies you have ripped off and owe money too first - celtic fc included. Makes no difference this ban. Do the good thing and take ur lenient punishment on the chin..........martyc1888

Agree4 Disagree5

No not Refs - A Ref was found to be telling porkies about a penalty decision when under immense pressure. He was found out and dealt with. Don't tarnish all Refs with the same brush although that it what is being implied everytime Celtic's Manager gets a decision against them.

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 22:25:37
Does McCoist think that knowing who was on the judicail panel will make any diffrence to what their descision in the sanctions that were imposed on the club or they might reverse the descions that were made. ? The answer....NO.. The SFA would have picked three impartial executives to make the santions. When your on the platform with the noose around your neck do you cry and blubber like a big girl or do you hold your head up and and take your punishment like a real man. When your guilty your guilty if your not. . Well that means you have not defended yourself good enough...

Believable4 Unbelievable5

24 Apr 2012 22:08:11
Surely Jeff Stelling can't be that thick, wondering why the chelsea fans are still in the stadium 1 hour after the game.
They are locked in Jeff by la olda billa

Believable4 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 22:07:58
can someone tell me why sir david murry is not in any hot water over any of the dodgy goings on?

Believable8 Unbelievable0

Hes teflon man.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 22:07:29
Here's an idea for rangers fans seeking answers to various questions.Find a shareholder and find out just who was using EBT's,then ask them to pay the "loan" back.Got a feeling you might find the answers very interesting...........green jhedi

Believable3 Unbelievable3

24 Apr 2012 21:58:23
rangers will get a cva if club gets a good bid, offers so far no good end of

Believable0 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 21:56:43
im fed up with all this messing about with administrators and preferred bidders and players with contracts/ no contracts and blah blah balh. put the club in liquidation have a clear out get some people together and start again debt free the club will soon grow again.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 21:41:38
Nice one Chelsea, nice to see a GB team getting thro. Few players gonnae be regretting their red and yellow cards now.

Believable9 Unbelievable4

Well said took my mind of our problems...Blues Brothers...

Agree4 Disagree2

This is why we like football, you just never know whats gonna happen.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 21:41:17
We supporters are not saying the club shouldn't be punished for past mismanagement but what we are saying is a transfer embargo is kicking us when we are down,there are other options they could have looked at but instead they chose the one option that could jeopardise any sale of the club which at this time is hanging by a thread at best.
Anyone who believes an SPL without Rangers can be competitive is deluding themselves and all will suffer as Sky are likely to pull the plug or in best case significantly reduce their offer for TV rights which could in turn put a lot of other teams in the red not to mention no gate money from Rangers away support.
The east end mob who are so eager to put the boot in know themselves even if they won't admit it will also suffer with the likes of scott brown etc likely to jump ship to prem or championship to get a competetive game.
These are facts.

Believable6 Unbelievable6

Why do people think Sky is the only show in town? There are other companies who could bid for rights too, you know.

Agree6 Disagree6

Rangers have got off lightly,shut up and take the wee slap on the wrist that the SFA have given you,it could and should have been much worse

Agree4 Disagree3

Ok if u dont pay for players u bought and your debts what do u expect u give it we dont do walking way mybe it should be we dont do paying or we just blame everyone else for our problems

Agree4 Disagree3

Your down because , your owners etc put you there , your clubs fault , you want to take the glory , you need to take your punishment on the chin . Forget all the spl wont be competive , you may be right , but has nothing to do with this .
your club broke the rules , you take the punishment

Agree4 Disagree3

Yes BBC Alba, enjoy

Agree2 Disagree1

Sky offered the best deal, but this will be revoked without the Old Firm incentive. Yes other bidders may then step in if Sky pull out, but it will be a pittance on offer, especially without the 4 Old Firm games annually.

Agree4 Disagree2

This is a load of crap. rangers werent gonna sign anybody anyway. whyte wont pay the fine and rangers owe that much money does it matter who they dont pay ? proper punishment would be make craig whyte run round ibrox in the buff at half time while stuff is chucked at him. put rangers in div 3 with a 30 point penalty for 5 years and force them to wear wellies instead of boots.

Agree5 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 21:38:41
Come on Chelsea

Believable9 Unbelievable4

24 Apr 2012 21:14:11
If we have to drop out of the spl-where we aren't wanted it would seem, why don't we apply to join the northern Ireland league. We have a huge fan base there and it is easy travel from the Scottish central belt. We could ground share with linfield, a team who have shown support for us.

Believable5 Unbelievable6

Desperado why don't you come to your senses.....mmmm.....there's a song in there!

Agree5 Disagree2

You on the buckie tonight?

Agree5 Disagree1

Don't talk tosh m8 we are rangers I live in NI I wouldn't open my curtains to watch Irish league football pi$h sorry to say it but have to be honest. BLUNTRU72 LLRFC

Agree4 Disagree2

I may be wrong but i think the deadline for joining sfl may have passed falkirk put a application in 2 join spl over 4 weeks ago

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 21:07:23
Speaks volumes about the Scottish football authorities if this goes through and all the other stupid penalties. Once we are bought over ,come next season gers fans should boycott all away games and this coupled with sky cutting the money would stop the tail wagging the dog. Not one other spl team has come out in support of us. Don't forget bears, no-one likes us we don't care!

Believable7 Unbelievable7

Do you wonder why they don't? If you're looking for reasons, start with your own post.

Agree9 Disagree5

24 Apr 2012 21:04:33
Does this embargo stop the rangers fans from signing on?

Believable11 Unbelievable2

Omg that was so funny ".......... Not

Agree2 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 20:56:16
Can any rangers fan tell me what
FAIR sanctions should be imposed
on your club for all the wrongs that
have been commited? All iv seen so far is the rules being implemented. Your club thought they were untouchable. THEY ARE NOT.

Believable10 Unbelievable4

No SPL club has been in this serious situation before, (Yes admin, but not with all our other problems) and the SFA are not sure how to apply the rules as they exist. So they appear to be making up new rules as they go along - and that's what's annoying people the most. We are trying to get out of Administration and the SFA are not being helpful with their timing of statements. We've already been docked points for next season, can't sign players etc. What other 'New Rules' are they going to come up with shortly? If their job is to make sure we don't get a buyer and go bust then that's what they are helping to achieve. Remember the rest of the league WILL suffer financially from an absent Rangers no matter what they choose to believe otherwise.'Don't cut off your nose to spite your face' comes to mind.

Agree5 Disagree4

I think under 'normal' circumstances the sanctions would be FAIR. However, these are far from 'normal' circumstances.

The usual intention is to impose a 'survivable' sanction that disadvantages the competitiveness of the club for a period of time - the penalty.

For Rangers current woes, and there are many, a new investor needs to put together a financial plan to rescue the club, with no european matches for three years, deprived of 75% income from SPL TV(?), the prospect of losing some/many first team players over the summer, and Rangers perhaps only being able to field a senior school team of 16/17yr olds in next year's SPL, starting with a 10-15pt deduction - the 'grown up' SFA 'sanction'(s).

However things turn out, the SPL next year is going to be a bit of a joke, it may not have been the motivation behind the sanctions, but it will be the end result.

SFA worried about the game being 'brought into disrepute', well they're certainly hellbent on making it a laughing stock instead.

Agree2 Disagree1

If the rules where in place before the fact, i wouldnt have a problem, but the sfa and spl are making the rules up as they go along....jsm

Agree3 Disagree1

If you mean the Tax case,HMRC still trying to prove anything,this sanctions was CW,s doing and nothing to do with any EBT,s
the team,staff and fans having to suffer
while he get off again,as a Rangers fan i accept that any wrong doing must be punished and debts paid but you need players to actually operate as a football club.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 20:55:56
Is big dafferty working his ticket and desperate to get out without losing face with us! He should hang his head in shame and give us the performance of his life on Sunday!

Believable3 Unbelievable3

He is banned for 2 weeks.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 20:55:49
Could be the best thing that's ever happened to Scottish football. Let's face it, the product is so boring right now, we could still lose SKY sponsorship, even if Rangers stay in the SPL. Scottish football is bankrupt [financially and morally] - Rangers are simply the biggest contributor.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

If every club in Scotland was given the same scrutiny I think it would shut a few people up

bill72

Agree1 Disagree4

24 Apr 2012 20:45:46
As a life long rangers fan I'm as gutted as the next person regarding the current state of the club but as ally said tonight it's time to FIGHT BACK.

In my opinion I say let's go into liquidation right off the debt and start a newco and when the SFA impose a 10 point deduction for the start of the season in the SPL we tell them to GTF we demand we start in the bottom divison and work our way up like livingston my reasons are listed below:

1. Sky pull the plug no cash for clubs
2. No travelling rangers fans to give clubs revenue
3. All decent players disappear down south SPL crumbles
4. No European football for Scottish clubs
5. Scottish coefficient ranking drops like a stone so Scotland national team suffers

everyone wants to put the boot into us well I say let them and see where they are in a few years SFA shaft us just now in the long run they shaft themselves.

Thoughts fellow bears??

WDDWA

Believable10 Unbelievable7

Sky isn't the only TV company - there's always ESPN, remember.

Agree5 Disagree6

Well I can seem to remember the SFA took that stance a few years ago with setanta and the BBC etc and did that go well I don't think so. Let's face it sky aren't the only tv company butt they are the biggest and offer the most cash at the end of the day

Agree4 Disagree2

"All decent players disappear down south , the SPL crumbles" . And who would they be ? . So u think if Mcgregor and Naismith leave its Armageddon time . Dream on.......DH

Agree3 Disagree1

Your post sums up the Rangers mentallity,welsh on debt,care about no one else and try to hurt other clubs when there is nobody to blame but Rangers

Agree5 Disagree3

@1. Do you think ESPN will pay 80Million quid. Will be a fraction of that if you're lucky.

Agree4 Disagree2

Why do u feel the need to blame all around u no one is puting the boot in u need 2 pay for your crimes get a grip

Agree4 Disagree3

Demanding you join 3rd division did you not mean begging, A little bit of contrition would not go amiss

Agree4 Disagree2

ESPN is a bigger company than Sky.

Agree1 Disagree3

@8. And you think they will pay more than Sky for what will be left in the SPL.

Agree1 Disagree0

To the person disagreeing with the fact that ESPN is bigger: check it out. ESPN is a massive company which, if internet streaming doesn't take off as expected in the next few years, could very well blow Sky out of the water with the next English TV deal.

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 20:40:15
Ideal opportunity to show how serious we are is too boycott Sundays game. It's live on sky. An old firm with no rangers support.

Believable10 Unbelievable1

Do it then we will still get the money anyway

Agree6 Disagree1

You will not be missed.

Agree4 Disagree1

Do it it will save Celtic a fortune in repairs

Agree5 Disagree1

Please do

Agree4 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 20:32:03
As Ally says starting again from the third division might be the best thing (next with a 16/17yr old team). To be honest, fed up with the SFA. If we were to 'start again', rather do it in the english 4th division - at least after a few years we'd be getting proper games, week in week out - and maybe some premiership TV money to boot.

The SPL can have a hoot playing with themseleves.

;)

Believable5 Unbelievable5

How many times do you have to be told?! Even if you could go to England (you can't), it wouldn't be in the 4th division (do you mean League 2 or the Conference?); it would be in the Conference North bottom division, about 12 leagues from the Premier League.

Agree6 Disagree2

Reply to 2) Fine, anywhere but SFA.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 20:28:43
BREAKING NEWS: Rangers left reeling in shock as they find out that rules apply to them just like everyone else.

Believable13 Unbelievable5

Is this the old rules or the new 'ad-hoc' ones.

Agree4 Disagree1

Just multiplied by 10

Seems fair??

bill72

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 20:13:35
Sfa must remember if we die that means no deal with eng and even no spl- div-1-2-3. Nd for u lot at Celtic that means you will have to sell your best players which is only hooper the rest r poor nd your over paid players that means all of them

Believable3 Unbelievable6

At least we can pay our players,fab1

Agree4 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 20:23:33
Gers fan here asking fellow fans to allow hearts and hibs their cup final in peace, they have waited over 100 years for this day, what gives us the right to ruining it for them with our protests?

Believable17 Unbelievable1

Agree, if we want to protest, do it at Ibrox - don't ruin Hearts/Hibs fans day out at Hampden. The beaks will get the message no matter where it comes from.

Agree11 Disagree1

Totally agree our t**ts in charge have made us look bad enough without us marching on cup final day , it should definately be another day.
craig+babybear

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 20:19:35
The Scottish Football Association have stressed they need to implement rules "without fear or favour" following a backlash from Rangers fans and administrators over sanctions against the club.

Then why Mr REGAN were four witnesses not allowed to give evidence in a recent hearing ONE of whom was a POLICE officer resulting in a guilty man walking free
you MR REGAN are a puppet good luck hosting the OLYMPIC football at Hampden hope there are not peaceful protests causing traffic problems lot of pressure to get those games started on time with billions watching on world wide TV

Believable5 Unbelievable3

Since when did billions watch Olympic football? Unless you can get Usain Bolt to refuse to run in the100m final as a protest against the evil treatment of Rangers, you've no chance.

1903

Agree6 Disagree0

Err,that would be cos one of them lied.Peacefull protest? dont make me laugh........green jhedi

Agree5 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 20:18:01
The boycott should start at parkhead on Sunday.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

Please please do ...

Agree6 Disagree0

This game will be televised world wide. It would make sense for the protest to start there. Certainly make sure that SKY will take note of what is going on.

Agree5 Disagree3

@3; Great idea.please..........green jhedi

Agree4 Disagree0

Aye well im still going and my couple of mates with tickets will be there, why as true fans to our team do u want to walk... craig+babybear

Agree1 Disagree1

Like the police are really going to allow Rangers fans to protest at Celtic Park!

Agree3 Disagree0

@3 You split on this subject or just talking to yourself?

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 20:08:21
To the post at 19.07 on rumours page,
Are you serious as rangers fc have a bigger roll of honour they shouldent becpunished as they are more famous,
The same as we would go to jail if someone was found dead & buggered full of a class a drug,
Say you were a more famous person you should get off as its the famous tv presenter,
Comments like that are a embarresmentvto rangers fc,
A club who will when in a position rite all their wrongs that iam sure,
Beleive it or not their are still some honest people at rangers that dont deserve it but accept it,
Thats people that made rangers great.
Airdrie ring any bells,
Treat others the way you would prefer to be treated not do as i say not as i do,

Believable8 Unbelievable1

Applaud sentiments mate, refreshing to get candour and honesty at this point in the protracted agony we are enduring at the moment....we could make something good and honourable out of this mess,

Agree4 Disagree0

Like the police are really going to allow Rangers fans to protest at Celtic Park!

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers should not be be punished craig sh/te should be put in jail no team should be punished like this if a rat taks over anddestroys them 4 his own gain plus sfa should be punished 4 letting it happen

Agree0 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 20:05:22
ed, ive been trying to get an answer to a question but not having much luck, the question is, if rangers come back into the spl as a newco does todays sanctions still apply? the reason i ask this is that there seems to be a good chance of bill miller being appointed as prefered bidder in the coming days, now we know that the spl will let rangers re-enter as a new co with a 10pt deduction and some money sanctions but i would really like to know how they could uphold the transfer embargo and the 160k fine. are we getting to excited about something that really means nothing?.....col..... {Ed001's Note - the sanctions would be applied to any newco, yes.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

If sentence was passed on oldco canny see how that would stand up in court of law thats like finding me guilty of whatever and jailing my son Thats the point of newco to get rid of oldco problems if it could be passed to newco then why wouldnt creditors just do the same

Agree0 Disagree2

Only applies if the newco retains the old clubs history name etc according to STV. A Glasgow Rangers FC for example started in June 2012 would not have to suffer this punishment.

Agree0 Disagree2

U lot want it all u dont want 2 pay your debt if its a newco u want 2 keep history and have no sanctions wake up and get in the real world

Agree4 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 20:00:07
Not looked myself but friend tells me that even a celt fan like Paul mcconville is blogging that we will win an appeal. Could just be posturing by the sfa trying to look hard and carry favour with uefa. A.(nother) worry is that news just keeps coming and coming. I don't see how either TBK or Miller can by the gets without knowing the full and final picture and simply the time delay more than anything else might force liquidation! I fear for the gers and I fear for scottish football.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 19:59:31
Celtic are behind the scenes plotting to get a move to the English League. There position looks better with no Rangers. Watch and see.

Believable4 Unbelievable10

Talking bullocks.

Agree5 Disagree2

Give it up.theres no way...........green jhedi

Agree5 Disagree3

Uefa won't allow any team from Scotland to play in England its been said a million times now.

Celtic are stuck in this backwater and with no Rangers they will be sevely weakened in years to come.

Who in their right mind will want to sign for a club that plays against St mirren and Inverness every few weeks and will most probably struggle to get past August still in Europe?

Rangers go under Celtic won't be that far behind wait and see.

Agree4 Disagree7

No it doesnt there would have to be no viable STADIUMS to have a league has nothing to do with quality of opponent

Agree1 Disagree1

@3: Celtic won't go under, no matter how much you hope and pray it happens.

Agree6 Disagree2

Total bunkum

Agree3 Disagree0

5.)
Think av heard that before somewhere

bill72

Agree1 Disagree0

@7. About 1994 i think.

Agree1 Disagree0

@8: and it didn't happen.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:52:09
RANGERS manager Ally McCoist tonight gave an explosive interview in which he demanded to know who handed out the SFA's punishments and admitted dropping down three divisions "might be the right thing". 

Source: Rangers TV and DR

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Stewart Regan was courted for the job by Peter Lawwell who coincidently is on the board of the SFA. Conspiracy or fact!

Agree2 Disagree5

And what about Ogilvie?

Agree7 Disagree0

What about Ogilvie...Used to be on the board at Rangers, then went to Hearts and then the SFA. Peter Lawwell is still on the board at Celtic and the SFA. Ogilvie is not on the board at Rangers and the SFA.

Agree2 Disagree3

3) Campbell Ogilvie still owes Rangers for a loan from the EBT scheme. I dont recall any members of the SFA owing Celtic money.

Agree3 Disagree2

@4. So that would mean another Conspiracy theory then?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 apr 2012 19:50:58
davy the bitter fan on clyde one. who hates the sfa, is he dealing with the full deck,the sfa are doing a good job, at a difficult time.

Believable6 Unbelievable3

24 Apr 2012 19:40:57
I am writing this to all Rangers fans as much as too my Rangers fans.

Look you cant seperate club and owners cause now it suits you. CW is the owner of RFC, he ran it so hes at fault and so is the club and to say no one else is at fault is a big lie.

CW didn't run it on its own, he had employees and other directors doing his bidding and no one blew the whistle.

None of the staff came out and said we havent paid the taxes, well sweep it under the carpet.

CW is right when he said he should have put Rangers into administration last Otcotber before the debt mountain got any bigger.

Look its this simple, I know its a club you love, but they havent paid there taxes, they haven't paid their debts, CW doesn't owe the money, no ones chasing him for it , the club owes it, so its time to pay the price, the SFA penalty is the minimum they could do appealing could lead to worse penalties!

Also I may not be a Rangers fan but I like Ally so i,m disappointed to see hes wanting to know 'who is on this panel' that penalised Rangers, its none of his business, when Rangers was getting into massive debt he didn't want to know, when SDM sold to CW he'd didn't say anything, so now he's angry!

Is it because his £1 million per year job is on the line?

Look either way Rangers has to bite the bullet, keep the history take the pain, the fans will stick with the club and Rangers will be back in the fighting for the top spot in SPL in a year!, remeber the SPL is not like the EPL, when a team goes down there, there a lot of very hungry teams vying to take their place.

In the SPL in the last 40 years Celtic and Rangers have ahd their up and downs and still no other team took their place.

So dry up, stop the whinning, you's are remaking a show of yourselves, take the punishment now save the history pay back as much as yous can and you'll be upi on your fett again in no time.

Dont expect any sympathy from other clubs, when Rangers were on top they didn't shwo a lot for other clubs.

Believable7 Unbelievable2

Totally deluded this was a vindictive act timed to disrupt the takeover pure and simple nobody is saying we dont deserve to be punished but cant remember any case where the perpetrator has been able to gain financially from the victim of their incompetence and set the amount themselves

Agree1 Disagree3

@1: it's a bit rich you accusing other people of delusion: have you read your post?

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:42:05
Dont get confused.

This is NOT an SFA issue, its an
RFC issue.

Not TAX
No PAYE
EBT
Dual Contracts

Years of SDM corruption...

Face up to the facts...standup and take
the punishment,rebuild back in 3yrs...
2 old Firm Games a year (Cup games)

3 year darkness then start again

Believable7 Unbelievable4

How can anyone disagree? It's fact.

Agree6 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 19:35:28
Now I know there are some really clever
bears who read these posts (2 out of 1000)
perhaps one of these really clever bears
will be able to see a teeny weeny flaw
in these two statements made today
by Duff & Duffer....
Statement 1) You cannot punish Rangers
for the actions of one man, as Mr Whyte
had complete control at Ibrox...
Statement 2) As Mr Withey was in
overall control at the company, his
firm Collyer Bristow MUST share most
of the blame....
Ok you intelligent bears opening arguments
please...... Timalloy

Believable6 Unbelievable4

24 Apr 2012 19:35:03
There have always been factions within the gers support for years. Each had their own agenda and frequently disagreed or disliked one another. Today's statement by the vanguard bears supporting Mark Dingwall is a wow moment. The SFA have managed to coalesce a support that has never happened before, I do believe there will be boycotts and bans to follow.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

Banned from Europe,hows that for starters?

Agree5 Disagree1

@1 Who's banned from europe?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:33:14
for all the rangers fans planning porotetations(hopefully peaceful) i would like to know what you think would be a fair punishment for your financial dealings?

do you think you should be punished at all?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 19:06:19
sky have said no rangers no new deal for spl

Believable3 Unbelievable4

And you know how?........green jhedi

Agree5 Disagree1

ESPN might say yes, though.

Agree2 Disagree0

How do you know this? Do you know Rupert Murdoch? Because I can't find anything on sky about this?

Agree4 Disagree1

No chance,i for one would cancel my sky package

Agree3 Disagree1

@4; expect a chap at the door from murdoch begging you to come back.............green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree1

@5 might be ally with new job garlar07

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:03:59
 really dont understand how AMcC is happy to blame the SFA for the downfall of Rangers but yet I dont recall him ever speaking publicly about SDM. This was all the old boards mess and they knew what they were getting involved in with CW. Did Ally sign a gagging order or did he happily take part in the EBT wheeze like all the other super stars?

Believable6 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 19:30:32
Ally update on the official RFC site,
but also has pic of Durant playing
golf having a good time...
major PR blunder...check this out...

Believable4 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 19:12:00
Im sick of McCoist he is shouting his
mouth off about wanting to know
the names of the panel members who
were involved in the sanctions. He
is winding the fans up as he knows
exactly who these people are. I
have lost respect for this yes man.
JB

Believable9 Unbelievable3

Wee sly sally strikes again,lets see if the SFA throw the book at him,somehow i doubt it

Agree10 Disagree2

What's wrong with wanting to know the people who've tried and found you guilty , after all even in a court of law you know the judges name .

Agree1 Disagree6

24 Apr 2012 19:11:53
So much blind leading the blind on here it's pathetic

Sure complain about the SFA, demo against them on cup final day. Oh yes all this is the SFAs fault.

Please please bears get a life. This has booger all to do with the SFA.

So tell me. Where is ur demo outside mr Murrays company headquarters, or outside Whites offices. Where is ur week in week out demo at ibrox

They're the culprits. They're the reason rangers are in this sh!t

Stop all this garbage now and get back to reality. The SFA have given rangers the lightest possible punishment possible

The two stooges meanwhile have dealt a death blow from which rangers will struggle to recover

Time to repeal his knighthood

Believable9 Unbelievable0

Meant to put my name to my previous post

Don't care for anonymous posters who don't

Stand and be counted eh

It's MOJO

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:08:53
Dear ed heard a rumour that if we are liquidated then we could buy a third tier English club change their name to rangers and move their stadium to Ibrox. Is this possible after all if we have to start a newco and apply to join the Scottish 3rd division what is to stop us leaving the Scottish leagues? {Ed001's Note - no.}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

The 2011/2012 rfc rumours post of year goes to
NOT YOU,
your no maked that realy tikled me

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 19:02:32
WEE TIP for Hibs hearts Dundee utd Kilmarnock whatever you do dont use D&P when you go into ADMIN next year. On a better note good to see that sense has prevailed and we are considering resigning from SPL why subsidize an organization that is trying to kill us bye bye SKYand Clydesdale bank sponsorship and by the time we get back up SPL

Believable4 Unbelievable2

And that'll mean no money for Rangers when they get back into the SPL.

Agree2 Disagree0

Administration is a word most spl teams fans should expect to hear a lot next season without Rangers.

Even a club like Hibs who are not the worst off financially are running at a debt level that's 3 times bigger than turnover, how long can that last with even less money in the coffers?

As for Europe Celtic are 63rd in the coefficent rankings at the minte the next best spl teams are 185th and 195th. Rangers are the only Scottish team in the top 50. Says it all really about how bad the spl would be without Rangers.

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 18:52:04
Your arrogance is astounding! It really is laughable how everyone's against Rangers, the SFA have it in for the club, it's the SFA's fault Rangers are in financial ruin, you're going to boycott this and boycott that.......you lot sound like Celtic supporters, the supporters you mock! haha

Now the shoe's on the other foot and you're all crying wolf, my oh my the irony of it all.

I told you all last year the books were a shambles and you gave me it tight.......well, I've been vindicated and I'm absolutely delighted. Yes, Celtic fans are all over this page, and so they should be, it's payback!

Rangers are at fault, so Rangers have to be punished, you were all happy with Murray's egotistical overspending from day one and look where it's ended up. All your biscuit tin and tenner for every fiver have come back to bite you on the spotty botty! lol

Sir David Murray, your legendary ex-chairman, is the real culprit in all this - he accumulated the debt, he sold to Whyte, he ran off to France and his silence is deafening. Craig Whyte's just a wee chancer who capitalised on an opportunity and he took it - who gave him that opportunity? Hmmmm!

Enjoy!

Miko xx
(a wee xtra kiss for you PaulRFC, ma wee darlin) lol

Believable7 Unbelievable2

Pft, no arguments......says it all really!

Miko x

Agree3 Disagree1

Here we go again with the bitter hate and the inglorious rant,
' I told you all last year.....' is that how long you've been festering away? what a saddo.
'You lot sound like celtic supporters' and why not? moaning your faces off, complaining about everyone, implying sectarian bias in all the authorities has seen your club well enough through the years.
Add to that the 'estimated attendances tax scam' ran by the Kelly/White dynasty for years does show that you are better at scamming than us.

Agree3 Disagree2

@3: lame, lame lame.

Agree1 Disagree2

@2: lame, lame, lame lol

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 18:43:18
From the been...McCoist also admitted that he was "leaning towards" accepting that the club's immediate future might rest in the Third Division, a possible scenario should Rangers emerge from administration in the form of a newco.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

He is hoping as thats about Sallys level

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 18:40:17
Best to way to boycott the SFA is dont go to Scotland games, dont buy any SFA merchandising.

Das Shadow

Believable2 Unbelievable4

When do Rangers fan go to Scotland games anyway

Agree4 Disagree2

@1. About as often as Celtic fans.

Agree2 Disagree2

I will think you will find there was a independent survey a few years back which showed the majority of Scotland fans were indeed gers fans.

Agree1 Disagree2

@3: was that survey carried out by Wavetower?

Agree2 Disagree0

I will be going to scotland games and buying the shirt and hopefully paying full price for my season ticket to whatever division im in next year...
craig+babybear

Agree1 Disagree0

@4. Think it was from the same group that planned a tour of Japan.

Agree1 Disagree0

@2 totally agree,

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 18:39:02
Is it not about time David Murray got striped off his knighthood? This man is a criminal, dress it how ever u want he broke the law with not payin tax?

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Striped or hooped? lol

Agree2 Disagree0

Where's the criminal investigation into him then? If you're sure about him being a criminal, make a complaint to the police. Let us know how you get on.

Agree1 Disagree0

Take it you've never heard of defamation then ?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 18:34:38
As a regular poster I have questioned CW since day one, but never did I think that it would come to this, I really don't see anything but liquidation looming.
I have to say that the SFA punishment is perhaps deserved, after all DM and CW have behaved disgracefully.
I have never understood that the punishment for somebody in financial turmoil is more fines. It is like somebody in prison for non payment of fines, having another fine on top.
I also do not understand why SFA and SPL are hammering one of their members, surely you are meant to help your members. I am not suggesting that we get away Scott free, but remember this is the action of two individuals, it is not the fans fault, and yet it is us that suffers.
As regards the transfer embargo, it seems fair to me, why would we want to spend more when we clearly have no money is beyond me. Play the kids

Believable3 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 18:29:48
awryte bears - headin to my first away OF this weekend can anyone give me directions from queen street station??

Believable0 Unbelievable0

From celtic fan to rangers fan....get a taxi

for the sake aof a tenner mate a taxi will take you more or less to the away end.

either that or you can come right out of queen st head to your left & walk or get a bus along to duke st bus would be quicker & ask to get of at near the louden then its right over the hill by the retail park

lenny

Agree3 Disagree0

Just follow the party.

Agree4 Disagree0

Head east and follow the smell, you cannae miss it mate, WATP

Agree0 Disagree2

Follow the smell
GCUK

Agree0 Disagree2

@3;the smell will be your club festering

Agree2 Disagree0

Listen to no:3 it will take you right in amongst your own fans can't miss THAT smell.

Agree1 Disagree0

Get a taxi if u dont know glasgow mate, if ur urself and wise dont wear colours until u have teamed up with a few bears
craig+babybear

Agree0 Disagree0

To No 6.... Listen?? Na I just read it like most folk do on here! Are you hearing the voices that your manager does too.

Agree0 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 18:25:31
Why would the SFA do what they have done at such a critical time in Rangers' attempts to exit administration? I see all the Dhims are claiming it's our own fault and nobody else fault but at the end of the day the SFA have taken action that could spell the end of Glasgow Rangers.

Why do it? They know Rangers are on their knees and are suffering big time for past decisions made by the old board. Banning Rangers from signing players for a full season....who came up with that one?

It doesn't make sense. I hope Duff and Phelps are successful in their appeal and I hope they do have enough evidence to pin all of this on Craig Whyte.

I'd really like to know where the SFA pulled the transfer ban from and the reasoning for this ban!!

TTG

Believable1 Unbelievable5

Pretty simple clown you have NO MONEY!

Agree3 Disagree0

I think it is within 3 days they produce a report to support their decisions. {Ed001's Note - they have to produce the written report within 48 hours.}

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 17:42:00
agree with a few posts today, but not signing players least of our worries , as long as we have Rangers with our history intact ile be happy.

hold onto likes of aluko, naismith, and give youth like mccabe a chance. Sfa an embarrassment anyway, do they get fined for not catching whyte for fit and proper person, he fooled nearly everybody at start.
blue bear

Believable3 Unbelievable3

Naismith and aluko won't play in 3rd division.

Agree3 Disagree0

I'll be extremely happy if we can keep Aluko and Naismith next season. Both of them along with the likes of McCabe, Little and Ness are a breath of fresh.

I've been hearing that Naismith will be ver reluctant to leave Rangers at any time, no matter what the situatin be. Hopefully it's true. The boy is pure Rangers!!

TTG

Agree1 Disagree2

Aluko's contract is up at the end of the season how can you hold on to him if you cant sign new players/contracts {Ed001's Note - it is new players' registrations, not contracts. The players already registered to the club can sign new contracts still.}

Agree1 Disagree0

@TTG; theres an agent hawking naisnith round middle EPL clubs looking for 40k p/w. shoot it down if you like but it is true.

Agree1 Disagree2

So he'll stay on 75% of his wages?

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 18:05:45
Urging all true bears not to buy tickets for the last game of the season at Perth. Speaking to one of the saints directors today and he said all those numpties will buy tickets through saints let's see how many tickets will be sold after all saints are a member of the sfa and they shafted us big time like every one of them no one likes us we don't care Watp Perth loyal

Believable1 Unbelievable6

Are you stupid...rangers have shafted numerous spl teams and hundreds of other company's in today's climate these small company's have prob gone to wall because of rangers theft and greed of other clubs...any normal rangers fan would agree and don't start having a go about being a Celtic fan...rangers have many many great fans who deserve better than the way their club has been run,rangers fans thought winning their titles was done on level playing field but it was done with corruption

Agree3 Disagree0

If you were that loyal you would support a Perth team

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 18:01:20
Just read Regans statement, SFA beginning to wobble methinks. Also hearing they are surprised at the fury and are concerned at proposed boycotts mentioned on the web surrounding sponsors. SPL hierachy also alarmed with regards impact on future sponsorship deals. What an awful mess, RFC certainly not blameless.

Believable4 Unbelievable6

No wonder they are surprised,they have done Rangers a massive turn and you lot are 2 thick to realise it. You have no money so the signing ban is irrelevant any normal league you would have been demoted and you clowns are annoyed. What about the people you have stolen from have you no shame?

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 17:39:03
I cant beleive the arrogance& outcry being shown by the wounded bears!!!,,RFC,s mess,was there denial there own making& there own downfall!..lol now the PROTESTS start,bit late,were informed long ago....but was just us pesky timmys.....stevo...man up& take it on the chin...as that was only a jab,wait till hector delivers the right hook.k'od game over.....

Believable11 Unbelievable6

Hope you are enjoying our woes, but just realise that whilst Celtic will survive you will be watching a more boring and poorer product. There will be no sky money, and at least half the teams in the league will be unable to cope without rangers income, and tv money. Plus what chance of attracting a new sponsor for the league with no rangers. Instead of spending £3m on a player you will spend £1m, cause that's all you need.
We are suffering badly but be careful what you wish for.

Agree1 Disagree2

And then you woke up and realised... like always...you only wished it could happen....jog on timmy!

Agree1 Disagree4

You are not suffering as badly as you should be, bottom league was the only fair thing to do and the SFA bottled it

Agree3 Disagree1

Our Stevo won't be watchng anything, his life force will disappear when all this is done....no purpose in life anymore...mind you, my door's missing a wee knob.....

Agree0 Disagree2

@2; really?still with the jog on rubbish? you were warned 18 months ago but your response was.........you guessed it!

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 17:35:48
Am I tripping or does the sfa not investigate potential owners to make sure they are fit and proper, did they forget to do this with Craig whyte, surely when dm voiced his concerns, or even before this when the old board voiced their concerns, the sfa must have realised they made a mistake, everyone with half a brain or at least a lawyer could and should have looked into this guys finances, we the fans have been lied to by every single person with anything to do with rangers, now when we are trying to start over and pay back money we never knew hadn't been paid, they decide to kick us in the teeth, why should any fan of rangers stand by these idiots, what do they actually get paid for

Believable4 Unbelievable4

Well tbh the sfa should have done more but then again shouldnt have murray & more so the fans done more ?

murray - i will only sell the club to someone who can take the club forward ( pee pee ) he had 4 years notice on the HMRC case to basicly sell up & go before we make you the target man & strip you of the 'sir' in your name. 4 years no bidders & to be fair murray did cut the debt down(even tho there net debt was 83m at one stage) so it 'looks good' to any bidder & more so the fans. the old board bain etc all come out & said DO NOT SELL TO CRAIG WHYTE what did the fans do ? media that murray had in his pocket ? NOTHING.bang bang bang one by one the old board are away for bad mouthing him,bain etc all got bad mouthed for freezing money from rangers over whyte & still he was deemed the baddy. then it was were all craig whyte in whyte we trust etc etc by this point hes not paying NI & PAYE & at the same time hes got the fans in his pocket. then the bbc dig into whyte & then it goes on & on & on.....

so now the fans are cleaning up whytes mess when the old board warned you,you the FANS what craig whyte was like & as alex thomson said a 5 min google search on the name craig whyte it shows you his admin/liquidation history.but still no media coverage from the media (more so a certain paper ....) & after whyte now clearly saying yesterday/today good luck getting your money & i dont care etc its the fans it hurts the most so rather than being 4 months late & coming out with lets do this & that now its too late !

as a result we are now watching the scottish football as we know it die....so hopefully we will find out the outcome for hmrc before hmrc give us the result on the rangers saga.

ps remember it was hmrc that forced rangers into the corner of admin they tried to get there OWN people in but whyte filed for admin before they did & took on D&P (the same company that helped him with the 'takeover') so they can help him in his intrest rather than another company that would put the clubs intrest 1st.

you were warned & now its too late so lets watch what could be the last OF game for good.

lenny

Agree1 Disagree0

Sfa do not do checks. member clubs are aware of the requirements and should look after themselves. murray must have known. makes you wonder what else he knew about whyte.

Agree3 Disagree0

You are tripping

RANGERS should have carried out the checks- More passing of the the buck sonny

Mojo

Agree3 Disagree0

1) You mention DM voiced his concens. He sold the club to Whyte so was it not down to him that Rangers are in this mess?

David Murray is getting off scot free why is that?

Agree1 Disagree0

Obviously you guys don't read things before you reply I said everyone inside rangers knew what was going on, so did the sfa and apparently so did every Celtic fan, thing is you didn't, we didn't, it was stories from both sides, only now is the real truth coming out, so dont come on here acting all high and mighty blaming the fans for what's going on, we pay to watch football end of, if you have an axe to grind, get send the sfa an email they make the rules and are paid to listen, this is a rangers page, wtf are you doing here, mind you things do look better in blue

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 17:27:39
The Legal role of Duff and Phelps as with any administrator is to get the best deal for the creditors. Not the club, or the fans, just the creditors. Now correct me if I'm wrong but surely selling off Ranger's assets will surely raise more for the creditors than the £11.2 million Bill Miller is planning to put into Rangers for the CVA as part of the ridiculous 'hybrid' liquidation scheme he is proposing.

Can anyone explain to me how Duff and Phelps are expecting to avoid a legal sh*tstorm if they accept the Miller offer?

Mac

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Assuming that Bk involve ticketus they are no longer a creditor. That means the pot will contain more for the other creditors hence a CVA more likely to be accepted. If the previously reported deal stands where ticketus writes off £17m then their deal is better for creditors

Agree1 Disagree0

Keeping the business up and running is their primary objective, whilst getting the best deal for creditors and if all else fails then liquidation.

Agree0 Disagree0

The administrators first aim is to keep the company trading, you are talking about liquidation, which would happen if a suitable buyer for said company can not be found.

Agree0 Disagree0

Simples secured creditor Owner ad Debenture scheme are owed £40 million players and staff must be paid in full (legal liimts on this about £350 a week on full term of contract/redundancy) sale of assets would have to raise £55 million before it gets near the 11.2 million offered in most CVA there are more repayments over the coming years with all the players having get out of jail free cards written into there contracts they are unsellable murray park has restrictions on usage and doubt very much we would get £50 mill for Ibrox in a fire sale feeling might not be answer you wanted but thats my honest understanding of the situation

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 16:46:58
I don't get all this Celtic fans will get fed up winning league by 30 points, were rangers not celebrating leagues in the 90s when we had no competition? What's the difference, I'm envy of Celtic and wish we never cheated to win leagues.

Believable8 Unbelievable11

How the f did we cheat to win the leagues did we have 14 men on the park ,we won them by playing better football with better players ,if you say the ebt was the cause of it why did it take hmrc years to do something about it ,it s like blairs new law if you come out of the pub boisterous youl be marched to the nearest cashline to withdraw cash for your on the spot fine , next day tony blairs boy was found lying pissed in the gutter ,hmrc are a**holes ,i know cos ive been dealing with them for last 8 months reference debt enforcement office in edinburgh doug

Agree4 Disagree5

Ur clearly not a gers fan!

Agree2 Disagree1

Rangers always had competition in the 90s, Aberdeen took us to the last day in 91 teams like Moterwell and Celtic had good runs in other seasons as well, lets not forget here Rangers won a league title against a Celtic side that lost one game all season hardly dross.

But the landscape has changed since then, will Celtic fans really fork out £400-£500 per season every season to watch their side turn over Ross co and St mirren every other week, doubt it.

The Celtic sqaud next season would be cut down by about 50% and all players earning over 10k will be out the door,

Why on earth will Celtic spend millions on players when they can just sign the best of the rest from the spl and win the league by a mile?

Agree3 Disagree1

Erm, rangers were making illegal payments to players, therefore invalidating their registrations. that's the charge.

Agree3 Disagree0

The difference being in the big bad 90's there was still a Celtic team playing in the league. This time around there will be NO Rangers to put up a fight.Now how boring is that going to be hmmm?

Agree2 Disagree2

@3. Thats exactly what Peter Lawwell will be thinking if Rangers go bust and leave the SPL. Celtic are in debt and will be looking to then offload some of the larger wage earning players to balance the books. If you can win the league paying a player 5 grand a week, why pay somebody 30 grand a week.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 16:36:52
if you think we have been punished harshly !just wait till the big tax case result hits the fan ! proof of double contracts

Believable7 Unbelievable6

Yes no football licence

Agree2 Disagree4

If it was so clear cut why has it taken so long to punish us

Agree5 Disagree1

Proof that Scottish teams cheated to get into European competition off the back of Rangers achievements hope the whole board go up and confess to it if its true and state the did so with full knowledge and backing from SFA "we need the coefficient points" oooh dear oooh dear bans from Europe all round huge fines all round except of course for the totally blameless NEWCO 3 YEARS seem alright compared to the ban the rest will receive

Agree0 Disagree0

Do tell where's the hard proof of double contracts? Just seems to be rumour and pure speculation mixed in with alot of conjecture.

Agree1 Disagree0

The only proof of duel contracts so far come from an ex scrap merchant nuff said

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 16:34:39
hello fellow bears !:)

i'm sure not a lot will agree with me in fact probably only 2-3 people will lol but anyhow ,if rangers lose the appeal that's me done ! rangers supporter all my life through thick and thin but i have lost all faith in Scottish football and wont be watching it next season to see my team embarrassed in a one way league no thank you ! the SFA can suck me to be honest now u may call me everything "no a rangers fan or whatever but just how i feel , total let down , kick a man when hes down and bleeding !! but always WATP

.markky!x.watp

Believable5 Unbelievable4

Post that then end with watp? what a fool...............green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree2

Son, I`ve supported The Rangers for 40 years and even if they fielded a team of 1 legged Albanians, as long as they played for the jersey, I would be there.

Agree7 Disagree2

Green jhedi not really what I meant by at was i was done with Scottish football my heart will always be with rangers always but just lost faith in it now , its just down the s**tter and ran by a**eholes

Agree0 Disagree0

That's a great idea. one legged albanians should fit rangers budget next year.

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont think you can even buy 1 Legged Albanians, no transfers

Vambo

Agree0 Disagree0

@2; surely they would be hopping for the jersey?..........green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree0

Only if there under 18 one legged albanians

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 16:11:44
Question: What do u believe should have been Rangers punishment?

Also is this punishment for double contracts or just administration, Craig Whyte etc?

Believable0 Unbelievable2

Craig Whyte and the club are inseparable. Just read an article on the Guardian site which includes the line:
"When the SFA routinely fines Hearts for the wild utterances of Vladimir Romanov, the Edinburgh club cannot dodge penalties on the basis the Lithuanian is "only" their owner."

And supporters are "only his customers".

Agree2 Disagree0

Punished ok,but not repeatedly for the same mistake,,and its us the fans that are suffering not the money men

Agree2 Disagree1

The same as what motherwell and dundee got , the sfa have had an on running feud with gers even before farry cos they always thought they were the top dogs in park gardens doug

Agree0 Disagree0

@3;Farry? the guy who had to resign after shafting Celtic?.............green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 16:10:42
Is it not odd we prepared to protest against sfa,
Disrupt the people that will be relied on if newco happens,
Boycott away games
Withdraw players from scotland
Boycott scotland games
Whilst not a single show of displeasure or anger towards people who caused ALONE & KNOWINGLY,
Superb idea guys,
Forget sfa marches n march to ibrox for answers of people who broke the rules,

Believable9 Unbelievable0

Bang on the money..........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree0

Aye and were has the supporters trusts been the last year?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 16:03:55
Rusty the tim here!!why is it every1 else's fault but not rangers??the crimes the club has committed the sentences should be worse!!is it not better for it to come out now regarding the signing ban than wait till the new owner comes in and then gets hit with a ban??all I here is boycott this boycott that why don't use just grow up and relies you's are in the wrong and take the punishment!! Scottish football will always be here with or without rangers only the standard is debatable and know 1 knows if it will get better or worse!!hail hail rusty the tim

Believable8 Unbelievable6

So rusty the deluded dhim, Scottish football will always be here you say, but what will it be like, your own club have delayed asking for the renewing of season tickets as they will have to drop prices without Rangers, what about the smaller clubs, tv, sponsors will lose interest as its not wortwhile, your own fans will (2010 against motherwell, check the internet for the crowd) and the only sound in the San Giro will be the wind blowing up london Road and out Lenons mouth.
Be careful what you wish for!

Agree4 Disagree3

Don't come on here an preach about the rights and wrongs of our great club,yes we should take our punishment but it's our old board and owner,that should pay for this not the current squad and fans.if were liquidated no sky money poorer league.need I go on,oh and by the way a take it septic won on Saturday a didnae here ur wee ginger whinged complaining.Celtic always cheated never defeated 1888

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 16:01:09
More trouble to come the blue knights is the registered trade mark of an international biker club with twenty thousand members. Murray is not so smart if he thinks he can do what he wants through money.

Believable1 Unbelievable5

That's fewer than Rangers fans so who cares?

Seriously, Blue Knights isn't anything other than a kind of code word. No such company exists to my knowledge.

Agree5 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 15:57:05
So...no preferred bidder announced again today, conveniantly hidden by the SFA decision. Miller is ready and waiting, SFA decision is not a hindrance to him...what the hell are we waiting on?

Believable1 Unbelievable2

I guess we are waiting on peter lawell to decide what happens next in this Rangers saga? No wait....thats just me being paranoid!

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 15:56:32
Didn't a well known Swiss team sign players when there was a transfer embargo and tell their FA to do one or they would bankrupt them through European court of human rights to which they immediately backed down? {Ed001's Note - the team were then thrown out of European football, you might remember it because it was why Celtic were allowed in.}

Believable3 Unbelievable3

Yes and subsequently got booted out of Europe and finally deducted 30 points. Jesus come on guys your an embarrassment

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 15:49:23
How can you get rid of him when he's part of the best team in Scotland ! Having A Laff....

Believable2 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 15:27:19
Is the 12 month transfer ban a "special" sanction or would it have been applied eventually anyway as part of the whole "gone into admin" thing? I'm just surprised that, at the moment, there does not seem to be any mention of proportionality in the sanctions. Say a smaller club went into admin because of £1 mill would they receive the same 10pts off, 12 month no transfer etc? If that is the case then it pays to risk the whole shebang in a mad attempt to buy success and either benefit by things going your way or go bust for £100 mill and still face only the same retribution as the little fish that lost a mill due to some poor season results. If you gamble big time and lose big time shouldn't the punishment also be big time, much heavier than what the little fish gets, otherwise being extremely reckless gets only the same sanction as being unable to draw a crowd because your team is weak. Someone nicking a tenner from the till wouldn't get the same punishment as pinching the office safe, if they did then you might as well always take the safe just in case you get away with it!

Believable2 Unbelievable5

It's not about going into admin!

Agree0 Disagree1

Is administration, huge debts that could take years to pay off, or potential liquidation with further penalties not to mention the reputational damage to the brand, not a significant enough punishment. Or am I missing something!

Agree3 Disagree2

How do you expect a company in administration to pay £160,000? They are in administration because they do no have any money! £100 million, only if they lose big tax case! I am a Kilmarnock fan and am ashamed to be Scottish. I will not be renewing my season ticket; will not watch any Scottish football on TV; will not attend any Scotland International games because on idiots like yourself and the SFA. Enjoy your crap football!

Agree2 Disagree1

Ed - Are Rangers not already under a transfer embargo given that they are in administration?
Don74 {Ed001's Note - yes, they are.}

Agree3 Disagree0

Kilmarnock fan my bahookie.

Agree2 Disagree0

Get real if you cant pay 160000 and 800000 to hearts not even metioning the outstanding payment to Rapid ,can you tell me why should you be able to sign players. Any dignified team would have given the players back to the origional clubs but not Dignity FC

Dannybhoy

Agree1 Disagree0

Fair enough dannybhoy, but how much do everton and liverpool owe rangers for jelavic and wilson, this is the way football transfers are structured fella, the gers are on an even keel in reality with transfers but sounds good to a fan of the great unwashed, jog on ya wee rocket!!!

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 15:25:43
If we get liquidated I do not want the 'newco' joining in the Scottish league, we have dominated this league for over a century, it's time to move on to bigger and better things, with our fan base we could do really well in the English league, even if we have to start from the very bottom who cares it is better than this!

Believable8 Unbelievable6

FFS again with the English league. ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

Agree6 Disagree0

Uefa rules prohibit this. before you mention berwick or cardiff etc. their arrangements were existing at time of rule introduction so had to continue. bigger and better things are not what rangers will be moving on to.

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 15:25:14
Protest the 28th of april 1:30pm queens park glasgow (victoria road entrance) protest stop the sfa Spread the word

Believable6 Unbelievable7

SFA are closed on a Saturday!

Agree2 Disagree1

Ed - please stop allowing these stupid posts about demo-ing at SFA / Queens Park on Saturday....the SFA do NOT work on Saturday

so instead they'll be disrupting families and tourists going about their own business visiting the "Hampden Experience" ...

The time to demo was February 14th when the BIGGER ISSUE first happened....a bit late now and aimed at the wrong, wrong doers!

SPM

Agree4 Disagree2

Too late....you should have thought about that over a year ago...you were warned!

Agree3 Disagree0

Choose the next Scotland game to demo against the SFA....NOT the Hearts v Hibs Cup Final...the next Scotland game....

Register the demo with Strathclyde Police...set it up properly...keep it organised and peaceful

I see no point in trying to demo at a full capacity Cup Final where there is risk of clashes with Hibs supporters plus the place will be crawling with Police anyway...

And for the upteenth time, do not demo this Saturday cause the SFA do NOT work on a Saturday

SPM

Agree1 Disagree1

Thats it,stand in the car park of an empty building.Nice to see the fans groups are on top of the situation!...........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 15:22:47
I see poster on here trying to drag Neil Lennon in to the whole fiasco. This man had nothing to do with it. Leave him alone. Its Sir Ballocks Murray you should vent your anger at not Neil Lennon. So get a life stop try to raise trouble towards this man. He's been through enough. Backoff. Bigirishmac

Believable7 Unbelievable8

And exactly where is teh VERY bottom? I live in the Midlands and our local team is fighting to get promotion to the league just below the Conference. Right now they are eight division off the Premier League and there are a few below us. Even if the English set up wanted you - and they don't - your grandchildren would never see Rangers play in the English Premier League.

Agree6 Disagree2

Through enough correct sorting out mobrays mess and replacing tubes with better tubes doug

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 15:18:44
Trying to take something positive from the sanctions the SFA imposed last night.

My main concern is what happens if Craig Whyte does'nt pay is fine.

The good thing (to a point), is we start the season without a points deduction, so we're on a level playing regarding points.

We're at last starting to show some promising youth players this season. We're needing to be positive for these players coming through, give them the confidence for next season, cause a lot of responsibility will be put on their shoulders next season.

£160,000 fine, sent that to David Murray, after all it was his mess that got us into this, lets see if he really had Rangers at heart, why should he get away scot free.

Das Shadow

Believable5 Unbelievable3

@Das shadow; If Whyte dont pay they will hit rangers with the bill...........green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 15:13:26
Look fellow bears,I'm a great believer in "don't bite the hand that feeds you". I am sick in tired of this shambles that is going on with our club and today was another boot in the balls for rangers fans and enough is enough. Let's start shafting these people who are out to get us. These are the people of the sfa and spl who are hellbent on destroying our great club. I like many other rangers fans around the world had no control of what David Murray was doing. Start with not attending away games, these clubs always put the prices up when we play them. Boycott sponsors who support the sfa & spl. Last but not least and this hurts me rangers players should boycott playing for Scotland at any level.

Believable7 Unbelievable5

Why? Your club has been punished for wrongdoing? Why is that wrong? why do you want to take your ire out on those dishing out the punishments? Did you expect Rangers to get away with it?

Answers please...

Agree5 Disagree6

Rangers were already punished. Entering administration was punishment enough. Why put a transfer embargo on Rangers? Why fine a club with virtually no money? Why do it NOW, whilst the club are fighting tooth and nail for survival? Why not wait till the club has exited administration then hit them with these sanctions?

Also....is it only up to Rangers to do due diligence on potential new owners? Are the SFA not supposed to be on top of these things? These punishments have been dished out by the SFA in an attempt to cover their asses for basically failing to do the exact same that Rangers failed to do....a background check on Craig Whyte.

TTG

Agree1 Disagree0

If the SFA had said he wasn't fit to buy the club last May, how many Rangers fans would have been up in arms saying the SFA was trying to destroy the club etc.? Ring any bells?

1903

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:55:01
The SFA have more or less ruined next season aswell now because they are that thick, but i wouldent be concerned with this bears untill the appeal has happened, i am very confident this will be overturned...

The SFA have to much to lose by doing this, every punishment should be given to Mr Whyte, not the club the SFA have obviously thought, wait a minute here if we do this we can have a more competitive league, possibly force rangers to liqudate then we will let them back in with more sanctions and we will be able to change our voting structure'.

Believable7 Unbelievable5

Whyte is the owner of the club, therefore representing the club, so the club is punished. It's really quite simple. If he hadn't done what he did, Rangers wouldn't be in this mess, but the club allowed him to and the fans didn't question him until it was too late - it was all a Celtic conspiracy, was it not?

Agree3 Disagree2

No David Murray has ruided next year, we cheated so we get punished.

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 14:48:48
Any news from the 2 bidders Ed {Ed001's Note - nothing yet, I doubt it will have made any difference to them to be honest.}

Believable2 Unbelievable4

I believe it will have made a difference.
If Mr Miller was worried about sanctions ie -10pts next year, im sure not being able to stregnthen an already weakened team will be a big issue!

anyone who wants to buy our club and doesnt want to improve the squad is not welcome!

BluePeter {Ed001's Note - the plan is to get the club back into a profitable state, having a transfer ban is actually beneficial to that. It provides a ready made excuse for a buyer to invest as little of their own cash as possible.}

Agree1 Disagree2

Edd Im with you on that one. Either way youth is the only way forward for at least a season or two. Lets get out of admin first then debate if we can afford transfers into the club. We have to be realistic then anything else is a bonus IMO. CheltBlue

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 14:46:58
I feel embarrassed about somethings I am reading on here. This ever rising talk of 'hey lets start a newco and be done with it'. In my view the 'fans' that think and say this are glory hunters. They want there quite fix and 2 fingers up to the rest of them and everyone that we owe money too. I cant even write down how angry I am at these type of people. Punishments maybe harsh or not, but we take them and accept them, not come up with ways to get back at people we feel have wronged us. How many people have we wronged lately?
Well if the terrible happens to this great club, then I will hang my head and remember everything this club gave me and I will tell my daughter when she is older of this great scottish club and what it meant to be a part of. I will not support a new rangers. I will go to my local team and follow them, as I still love football. If you choose to follow a team claiming to be the great glasgow rangers then so be it, but please stop with the pro newco talk its just disgraceful.

Don

Believable10 Unbelievable6

I'll second that don .... on a slightly different note... Message to all "leaders" or "spokesman" for our so called "fan groups"... You're a bunch of f£cking clowns who wouldn't be able to find water in the middle of the pacific ocean... "let's have a protest" , aye , just a tad late ya bunch of bangers !
PaulRFC

Agree6 Disagree2

Your post really is nonsense of were liquidated il go support another te now whos the glory hunter,oh and don't u think 10 points and the rangers brand now tarnished not punishment enough just u continue to sit back and post ur comments good to c u have a hands on approach to matters.

Agree0 Disagree2

At last Paul we are on the same wave length m8..just posted at the top of page much the same....your spot on about your fans groups....On a lighter note,you say i post p!sh m8,..even you must be embarassed at the posts on here by so called gers fans....stevo

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:36:39
There is indeed much vindictiveness apparent in the recent SFA punishments – Motherwell were in administration in the early 2000s for a full 2 years, without a peep from the SFA or SPL about fit and proper personage (indeed the same man was owner/chairman post-admin), transfer embargos and not a single point deducted (that rule came later). More recently, Gretna were given a loan from the SPL to ensure they completed their fixtures in the 2008 season.

With that background of previous positive assistance for troubled clubs, it’s quite a trick for the Scottish football establishment to manage to sit so firmly on their hands (at best) while simultaneously giggling up their sleeves at Rangers’ plight.

The aforementioned beaks had should be careful they don’t cut off their nose to spite their face though. Sky/ESPN have a get-out clause from their new SPL TV contract unless both Rangers & Celtic are involved (who wants to watch a one-horse race? It’s bad enough with two), and the smaller clubs are much more dependent on TV money than Rangers & Celtic, despite the unequal carveup (it’s probably 20-30% of the income of a club like Inverness or Dunfermline). Hearts & Kilmarnock may well be next into admin without TV money. Added to that, the league has no sponsor after next season, and you begin to wonder quite what the SFA/SPL will be presiding over if the justifiable anger the more atavististic amongst the Rangers support feel is given full expression and the club starts again in the SFL 3rd Div (or indeed, the English football pyramid?)

Believable6 Unbelievable3

You have more chance in an Egyptian pyramid!..........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree3

Rangers have had money too, don't forget. Some of it even went to pay debts to other clubs. The authorities are doing as much as they reasonably can without compromising themselves.

Agree2 Disagree3

Who wants to watch a one horse race you were happy to watch it during your 9 in a row spending money you did,nt have while everyone else paid their way

Agree2 Disagree2

The 2 situations are different. whyte has been deemed unfit because of his past record. it was up to rangers fc (himself in otherwords) to scrutinise him. murray should have done this and it looks extremely unlikely that murray was not aware of this situation. the fact is the responsibility lay with murray. only he could ensure that he sold the club to a fit and proper person. the sfa do not and cannot get involved in these sort of negotiations. you are reading absolute crap in newspapers etc about this. has anyone asked jackson where he got his 'off the radar' info ? other directors voiced concerns at the time and were ignored.
however a scenario could be imagined where all of this has been planned from the start. whyte has past dealings with duff and phelps. if the law hasn't been broken and whyte's area of expertise seems to centre around avoiding that whilst making profits from struggling companies, then it's unlikely the sfa will bother him. this leaves the rest of scottish football no option but to set a precedent and punish the football club.( i can think of at least one chairman who might follow suit) at least it renders the business less valuable which will cut into whytes projected profit. maybe thats why he threw a tantrum. these blustering supporters organisations are ignoring or are ignorant of the facts. the situation at rangers is one of the worst ever cases of club insolvency and to lay the blame anywhere else other than the club itself is ridiculous. the club only exists as a business. the supporters are no more important in those terms than woolworths customers were when it went bust. sad but true. maybe a fc united thing would be best. let the vultures have their rotten meat.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:32:17
the sfa sanctions are fine and just...its just the timing is all...and you cant ask a player not to play for his country thats plain stupid.....lets get a cva and move on to bigger and better things....11 18 year olds will do me and we will win a heck of a lot of games....deecee

Believable3 Unbelievable4

No legal obligation to play for them if they so wish just as we have no legal obligation to support them or their corrupt and incompetent organisation

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:32:01
Douglas Cameron with a fan’s eye view:

For McCoist the top six would be the aim with the absolute maximum that could be achieved fourth place. I think he may be optimistic if a business and assets deal is done and we have a 10 point penalty for two seasons and are only permitted 25% of SPL revenue for three seasons. Since we can’t play in Europe for the next three seasons you can question how much this actually punishes Rangers.

We certainly won’t win the league with a diminished squad and a 10 point penalty. The interesting question would be what happens in the third season? At that time there is no points deduction and you would be looking to at least win a return to Europe. Is that though realistic with the players we would have?

The alternative punishment proposed by most non-Rangers fans would be Rangers playing in the SFL3 next season. (95% plus were quoted as favouring this in an online survey) If Rangers were to win consecutive promotions then is it unrealistic to think we could gain European entry as a First Division club by winning the Scottish Cup? Back in the SPL and back in Europe after three years?

Rather than die of a thousand cuts, Douglas reckons the club (pending the necessary re-structuring) should take matters into their own hands:

The more i think about it the more I think that we should announce our intention to resign from the SPL with effect from the last day of this season. We will go through whatever restructuring of the corporate company is required to save the club. We also announce our intention to apply for membership of SFL3 with effect from the first day of next season. The football implications of a business and assets deal are the only impediment I see to pushing ahead with this option. Perhaps rather than fear the punishment we should embrace it. In the eyes of the rest of Scottish football we would accept our punishment.

Any calls for further punishments would rightly be dismissed as vindictive. For Rangers’ support there is the prospect of delivering a financial blow to those currently preaching “sporting integrity” while really just seeking to protect their own bottom line. As a pure act of defiance I would imagine Ibrox would regularly have 30,000 provided realistically priced. With a reduced wage structure the club would be able to rebuild properly off the park while giving itself the full benefit of the talent being produced on it.

And as an aside, towards the end, he remarks, “I really fear that if still in the SPL the demand to remain competitive would stifle attempts to live within our means.” Well, it’s a bit of an ask within a sport where money and success have become symbiotic. The days of a club the size of Notts Forest picking up a European Cup (x2) purely on the basis of footballing talent are long gone.

And the “it-will-do-us-good-to-get-relegated” meme is something many fans of big English clubs have happily told themselves only to find the journey back a lot more problematic than they thought. As I well recall, Manchester City in the old Third Division was a cup final for every hole-in-the-hedge club in England. Whither Rovers, Wednesday, Leeds or Southampton?

In Rangers’ favour, there is no successor candidate club likely to replace them in their absence. Yet even after a future re-entry into the SPL it could take years to catch up financially with the only European horse in what would by then be a one horse town of Scottish soccer, Celtic Football Club.

It’s a bold and morally attractive idea. But as even Douglas admits, the real bugbear may be the length of time it takes to a square businenss deal that allows the club to plan strategically ahead once more…

Believable5 Unbelievable1

The SPL, SFA and SFL are 3 completely separate bodies. Who is to say that the SFL would not promote Rangers to the SFL1 on 'Footballing Merits' if they choose to resign from the SPL next season and apply for a place within the SFL league structure.

This may seem far fetched...but it was actually a scenario that occured with Fiorintina Viola in Italy after their liquidation.

With one space vacated in the SPL a member of the SFL1 would be promoted to enable the SPL to fulfil its placings/fixture list.

Rangers in the SFL1 could possibly bring new investment/sponsor/interest within the SFL's.

The SFA transfer embargo would still stand and Rangers would probably sell most of there stars...possibly keeping some old heads. The likes of McCulloch, Papac, Healy (and yes Broadfoot too) to enable them to guide the young one's to a challenge of the SFL1.

The prospect of Rangers not winning the SFL1 in the 1st season with a weakend team, may just persuade the other teams to allow them allocation of a place in the top of the SFL league structure.

Think about it....Thoughts?

W-Lyl

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:29:58
rangers fans planning mass protests and boycotts against the sfa. this should once and all put to bed the paranoia amongst the green half who think the sfa are pro rangers and anti celtic. wouldn't hold my breath though!

Believable6 Unbelievable3

Should protest at the Olympic games that would give world wide exposure

Agree0 Disagree2

This isn't an anti-Rangers move by the SFA - it's a punishment they deem sufficient for the wrong-doing carried out by and on behalf of the club. By saying it is, you're making yourself out to be as paranoid as the Celtic fans you refer to.

1903

Agree2 Disagree1

Olympic games ? mad.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:24:09
A Scottish Football Association panel could hear an appeal against the sanctions imposed on Rangers as early as next week.

An SFA spokesman said the panel will be comprised of experts from a "cab-rank system" that numbers "hundreds of retired officials, administrators, ex-managers and former players".

This panel would be chaired by a QC or senior judge, and could be up-and-running as early as next week.
Any further delay to this process would have grave repercussions for Rangers' hopes of emerging from their current crisis.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

It's a professional way to solve the issue. Well done SFA.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 14:18:34
Could guy's explain to me why they think that the punishment dished out to rangers is too harsh? Rangers this season have broke the rules, the have brought in players who they arnt going to pay for ie bocanegra, goian,badoya,*wallace. This has given them an unfair advantage over other teams and made scottish football even more of a laughing stock. So as Ally said the other day rangers can't expect no punishment what would be a fit and proper punishment that rangers fans would be happy with?

Believable4 Unbelievable4

That's right. Effectively fielding a team that was obtained fraudulently deserves punishment. I think Rangers fans can see that but it's then a case of how severe should the punishment be?

Agree1 Disagree0

The same punishment dished out to Motherwell, Gretna, etc! Rangers fans are not against being penalised, what we are against is an overwhelming move by Scottish Football to change the rules and punishments now it is Rangers in the wrong. Romanov at Hearts for example has broken the rules on numerous occassions and sanctions have been applied, but were they as severe on the club as this and how many times has he broken the rules? Motherwell and Gretna did not settle debts with other clubs and their own players, and were sanctions put down as significant as this .... no. I do think Rangers should be punished, but are they not already being punished on the verge of liquidation and with the Fans Favourite the Blue Knights wanting to pay back a large chunk of the debt (Ticketus and HMRC) over a long period of time. However, these moves by the SFA and SPL will have only one result Liquidation, and this will result in many people not getting paid. If this is the result, I feel as a Rangers fan we should take our punishment, start again in the 3rd Division with a young team and work our way up. It would ensure that the SPL is allowed to flourish in our absence, and rather than Rangers being uncompetitive because of point and financial deductions; they should grow from the roots up. {Ed001's Note - could the fighting fund not pay the fine?}

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 14:06:52
What happens if Whyte doesn't pay his fine?

1903

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He says he aint going to pay it ,so lets see what the mickey mouse sfa do

Agree0 Disagree0

Which he won't.

Oh, I dunno. "See you in court" probably.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers will have to pay it instead.

Agree0 Disagree0

They could levy further sanctions on the club, seeing as he's still the owner and majority shareholder, therefore still a representative.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 14:06:08
Hi Fellow Bears - This is fact :

Craig Whyte has stated that he has no intention of paying the fine levied on him by the SFA. if he does as he says,and let's remember who we are talking about here,what would the SFA do next?
Fact : If he doesn't pay it they will go after Rangers for any monies due ! More debt and embarassment from CW on us.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Why would they go after Rangers for his personnal fine ?

Agree2 Disagree0

Not sure they can go after Rangers unless the fine was against Rangers in the first place. Sounds like CW will wriggle his way out of this one.

Agree1 Disagree0

As far as i know he'll be the first not to pay. there will be a rule there which will kick rangers in the teeth.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 14:04:20
Saturday 28th april 1:30pm
queens park glasgow
victoria road entrance
protest against the s.f.a
backed by all major fan groups

Believable2 Unbelievable6

They don't work on a Saturday!

Agree1 Disagree0

Think you'll find that they wont be there !

Any protest should be at the next Scotland match to stop the SFA bigwigs getting to their Prawns and Champagne before the game!

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 13:56:12
Time to pack our bags and head for SFL3.

Let sky cancel the unsigned £80m T.V. contract and let a league that has no main sponser for next season see how it gets on without Rangers. The T.V. deal is 40% of income for clubs outside the old firm lets see what kind of shape the spl will be in next season without that money.

The spl would have zero competitiveness and bore everyone to death in the space of 3 months.

Celtic will also be playing in front of 10,000 fans in 18 months time without Rangers as lack of any real test will bore thier fans to tears.

Celtic at the minute are 31 points ahead of Motherwell & 34 ahead of Dundee utd their nearest challengers taking Rangers out of the picture, yeah what a great league that would be to watch next season.


Be careful what you wish for spl you may get it.

Believable5 Unbelievable4

Think they've got what they wanted - & still they will turn the knife again at the next meeting
you couldn't make it up

bill72

Agree3 Disagree0

Well said and just watch them all fall away , they cant survive without playing the old firm x 4 a season and receiving Sky money . The standard of football will get worse , more clubs to the wall .

Agree2 Disagree0

What a tired old post,why dont you give this nonsense up? So arrogant and selfish it almost beggars belief.............green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree3

Has anyone from Rangers even spoken to the SFL about this? Might not be an option.

(Seriously - do you really want to play East Stirling, Montrose and Annan Athletic next year?)

Agree1 Disagree0

Some of them don't play the Old Firm 4 times a season! Most clubs would need 300-500 extra fans for every other game to make up the money lost by not having Rangers coming to play. This is not unachievable, especially if the competition for top 6 and Europe is improved (if the league stays as it is).

Agree2 Disagree1

Its not arrogant ,its fact

Agree1 Disagree1

Why not the spls a pile crock,poor hubs side,Dunfermline,st mitten,need I go on no disrespect to these teams or fans but doesn't set the Heather on fire these games and were being shafted anyway so why not.

Agree0 Disagree0

RE:green jhedi

You and your fellow Celts really underestimate just how bad things are bad things are financially in the spl right now.

Hearts, Kilmarnock and Dundee utd are very near to going under thats a fact. With Rangers out of the league the banks will call in all debts and put them under wait and see.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 13:50:31
Given the new sanctions if the likely scenario happens and we are liquidated, would it not make more sense to start in the 3rd division with a youth side rather than face all the other penalties about to be annouced by the SPL. This way the Sky contract would be torn up, and we could try to negotiate a Rangers TV deal in the 3rd Division for those loyal supporters wishing to sponsor the team back up the leagues.
At least we will have the thrill of seeing young players mature and grow into an new look Rangers side as we progress up leagues we have a chance of winning each year.

Believable6 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 13:49:48
We should protest at the Scottish Cup Final meet at George Sq and walk out to Hampden, we should also lobby SFA why these actions weren't taken against Gretna, Dundee, Livingstone or Motherwell and also push for charges of bringing game into disrepute against Lennon, everytime he opens his mouth it happens.
SFA have got this wrong big time, why are these decisions being made when D&P are trying to find buyer? Would like to know who took part in this decision - surely anyone connected with an SPL club should not have been involved - conflict of interests

Believable5 Unbelievable6

Because they want to hurt us as much as possible ,along with the other clubs that have gladly taken the money over the years that WE pay to go to their grounds to watch our team play.
The SFA have waited for this for years and remember Lawell is involved with the SFA and do you think Ogilive wanted to leave Ibrox years ago ???
The problem with Scottish football is too many wee diddies in charge of clubs and the old pals acts.

Agree2 Disagree0

Remember and get permission or there will be arrests.......green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree2

Gretna went out of business. Otherwise a Gretna newco would have run into the same problems.

Agree0 Disagree0

What's this got to do with Lennon? Anyway Dundee got a 25 point penalty and weren't even in the SPL. Cost them promotion too.

Agree1 Disagree0

Gretna, Livingston etc. were punished but for different offences. If Rangers had paid the bills to all who were owed money, this wouldn't have happened. Stop being daft.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 13:42:56
So we're in administration and there's no sign we'll come out of this anytime soon, in fact liquidation seems more realistic ATM, we have a playing staff on reduced wages, bidders are dropping like flies, HMRC and Ticketus are owed millions, the RFF has been setup by fans to finance the day to day running of the club and service smaller outstanding debt, so what do we need.......a conclusion.no, a new owner? nowhere near.......what we really need is a find and ban from our governing body right?!!

This stinks big time!! I can't believe that a club our size and given the amount of money that we generate for scottish football has been kicked by the SFA whilst we are well and truely down. How can we ever get through this if we are getting hit with fines and bans that will effect any takeover of the club?!! I'm not interested in any negative comments or smart arse comments from Celtic fans wanting to gloat or take the moral high ground, i want to hear from my fellow Rangers fans as to what we do to ensure that the SFA suffer as they are making us suffer.

J1985

Believable7 Unbelievable2

FFS you broke the rules big time. The SFA looked at what you done and punished you.

Agree2 Disagree3

So because you have a large turnover(of which no tax or NI have been paid in a year!) you should be free to do what you want?...........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree4

D.utd 7 free transfers in there team.probably the form team in scotland,at the moment,i dont think it is the sanctions you should be worrying about ,its your manager.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 13:37:22
One last thing before I do a stevo and drink myself to oblivion, I would happy spend a fortune following the youngest , weakest rangers team in history, struggling for top six ? Not a problem , I'll still be there in the freezing winter spending money I can't really afford. What I WON'T do though is spend mine an my family's money following a newco who have screwed everyone from the wee corner shop to the queen herself, for some reason that just would not be right :-(
Paul(starting on her wine first)RFC

Believable8 Unbelievable2

Take it easy mate,You and fans with that attitude can hold your head high.....green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree2

Well said Paul, that wine was asking for it

Agree2 Disagree2

The liver is evil and must be punished,

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 13:13:17
haven't heard from stevo today

he's had us closing down every day since january

whats the latest ?

bill72

Believable4 Unbelievable0

He's away giving his expert advice on administration to duff and duffer, then he's got a meeting with HMRC re Rangers tax issues and finally the SPL to see what issues he can sort before the 30th. Then a well deserved bottle of buckie!!

Agree1 Disagree0

He changed name for tax purposes

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 13:11:14
Like any Rangers fan I would like to see us pay our debts no matter how long it takes, and build a young team.
However, given that it looks like we will be pushed down the liquidation path by our supportive fellow Scottish footballing body.
Given that our liquidation would likely mean other SPL clubs going to the wall, could we not just buy their club, buy Ibrox and put through a name change for that club. This way we remove the shackles that are being put round the club.!

Believable2 Unbelievable2

Whatever happened to building the young team etc?.........green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree2

Think the bad boys already tried that one with st mirren didn't they?

bill72

Agree0 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 13:10:48
let the sfa have there wee bit of fun , but as a club rfc should stand firm , withdraw all our players from the scottish national team as injuries may further affect us , withdraw from scottish cup or play our under 17 s , lets not take there crap lying down , could u ever see the mhanky mob accepting these sanctions ?

Believable2 Unbelievable5

If you do they'll just find some way of penalising you even more for non participation. Points and games being forfeited will only last a short while before they fling the bookcase at you, never mind the book.

Agree0 Disagree0

And again Celtic get dragged in.Have a day off..............green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 12:53:07
could have banned us from scottish cup also if newco is formed we are off scot free

Believable0 Unbelievable4

We should pull out of league cup and Scottish cup

Agree1 Disagree0

So that's OK then? All that matters is Rangers surviving, f*ck everyone else who's owed money or has been wronged in any way?

Agree2 Disagree1

The ban will carry over to a newco taking Rangers place in the Scottish League (SPL or 3rd Division). If the PFA are correct the players contracts are null-invoid, so we will have no players and can only sign under 18's?
However, we could by another SPL side and re-locate / re-name !

Agree0 Disagree1

2.) keep your comments for your own rumours page!

closing down rangers isn't going to put anything right - the only way any sort of amends can be made is to let the club stabilise and grow

bill72

Agree2 Disagree1

Bill72: what's wrong with the comments @2 and why shouldn't they be made here? I don't see Ed in front of your name.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 12:47:21
sfa punishment not to bad they will have to accept at best 10p in the pound £16000 via a cva or nothing we have a year to pay it also wont see cw monies either and the good news is they have pushed cw closer to the door as he will be banned from scottish football agree with the boycott idea to other clubs and withdraw our players from national team in protest

Believable4 Unbelievable5

What CVA? How many times...

Agree1 Disagree2

You do realise that if whyte does not pay,it's rangers who will get the bill?........green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree3

You wont have any international players for next scotland game pure gold

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 12:41:19
Sally & hahaferty fall out convo
Sally,ineed you for tynecastle as they beat champions am really worried,
Hahaferty,canny sally iv a huge hernia,
Sally lost plot saying he had played with to bigger lumps in his moobs than your hernia,

Believable1 Unbelievable7

What is that supposed to say?

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 12:29:16
It really does get worse and worse doesn't it?

Any minute now I'm expecting breaking news on Sky Sports News stating that the Rangers tea room kettle has broken, and even worse, they've ran out of both sugar and rich tea biscuits. "These latest tea related developments may indeed scupper both bids to take over the club. A statement released by Bill Miller states that before he improves his bid he requires clarification on the Rangers sugar shortage situation and any SFA sanctions placed on Rangers as a result".

Still, the SFA have imposed the most POINTLESS punishment on Craig White. The Rangers fans THEMSELVES have given him a lifetime ban from Scottish football - That's if he has any sense at all!


Me Here.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

If whyte doesn't pay the fine then the SFA come after the club to pay it, after all he owns the club. And if the club don't pay then the SFA have powers to inflict more sanctions.

So numbnuts, there was a point in fining whyte after all eh?

Agree2 Disagree4

Rich tea get a grip

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 12:11:59
I can understand RST frustrations but we need to be realistic, even AM recognises the club had to punishments faced by the club.
As for the sanctions proposed it would seem we are a bit far away from having our players
representing the National Side in the Why would we want to spoil the party for the Edinburgh teams in my opinion this would be counter-productive giving a message that we are self indulgent.
Maybe its time to reflect on us being seen to take a punishment and react with a dignified sense of sense of responsibility for the actions of our Clubs Boards

Believable8 Unbelievable6

I dont think the punishment is the issue. It is the timing of the punishment. At this perilous time for our club I see no benefit to anyone imposing these punishments/sanctions now. They could have waited to see if we can sort our s**t out first. This potentially can be an unneccessary deal buster.

Agree3 Disagree1

Well said.

Agree1 Disagree1

@1;How could they wait? They have to behave properly through all this.........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree3

Green jhedi...... the same way the English FA are waiting to deal with the Terry/Ferdinand race row until after the Euro's. If found guilty he will still be punished before the new season starts.

Agree1 Disagree0

@4;Totally different scenario.Thats to keep unity in a squad heading to a tournament.The SFA are a governing body who cant be seen to favour rangers........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 12:06:13
This is a real soap -opera. We are akin to a warring married couple, who hate each other but remain married when the reality is divorce would FREE them both and make them happier people. The truth is they avoid making the RIGHT decision for the LONG TERM benefit through fear of the unknown so they put up with a miserable, unfulfilling existence. (For the record I am happily married...not sure if my wife would say the same but I am happy LOL)

That is us!

I am becoming a greater supporter of saying let it all go and lets begin again in the THIRD DIVISION assuming the SFL will have us :)

No debt! No SPL politics! Give Celtic, Dundee United, Hibs their "justice" in seeing us die. But KNOWING our downfall will actually result in far reaching consequences for every other football team in the SPL (bar Celtic although they will still feel a "tremor" or two as a result of our fall from grace).

Let's EMBRACE change and start again...because OUR decision to do so will see the SPL lose the Sky deal....they will lose their existing sponsorship deals...

Sure they'll replace Sky and Clydesdale Bank but NOT to the same monetary value....

the SPL clubs will lose 2 home gates money every season from not having RFC travelling support which is an average loss of £100K to clubs outside of CFC / HOM every year....

OUR decision to accept possibly 4 years out of the SPL will deliver HUGE financial losses to those member clubs who have conspired to place obstacles in our attempts to find a new owner....I would guess around £1M per season...thats £4M for the time you would expect RFC to be playing in the SFL...that loss of revenue could break some clubs to the extent we may be playing some of our old SPL adversories sooner than in 4 years time!

Unfortunately this would also impact on decent clubs who have remained loyal to us....Motherwell and St Johnstone...but unlike many in the SPL they are well run clubs who live within their means and have good people as Custodians of their Club so we need to hope they would remain strong...

So just maybe...maybe...starting all over again is the RIGHT DECISION to not only address our problems...but also to get back at those parties who although are NOT to blame for the mess we are in, have certainly not wasted anytime in having a wee dance on our assumed grave!

SPM

Believable11 Unbelievable5

SPM You talk about clubs in the SPL losing out on money 1m here 100k there. What will Rangers lose if they go into the 3rd div. No tv money very little money for promotion Reducedticket prices and how many of the glory hunters will stand by your team.
So for all the money that will be lost to teams that can balance their books in the SPL what will happen to Rangers who cant manage that with millions coming in how will they manage with 100s thousands coming in.


Ian

Agree1 Disagree2

What a load of old b0llox. rangers are not the be all and end all of anything apart from themselves especially the end all, lol. the competition will continue and with rangers out the way we'll see the revival of clubs like aberdeen, hibs, hearts dundee utd. etc. it's happened before. take your threats and stick em. as for clubs remaining loyal to rangers, wtf ????
the difference between st. johnstone home gate with rangers and home gate with dundee utd was a whopping world record busting 751. now what if dufc and sjfc were competing for a euro spot ?
rangers demise is a game changer, but a better game. can't wait myself.

Agree3 Disagree2

As a life long supporter, a season ticket holder and a shareholder, I can only say that I completely agree.

Four years of hell for the SPL - they've made their bed - let's go down to the 3rd division and leave them.

Although we have not performed well in Europe recently, the SPL teams will miss our co-efficient points which will result in probably only one Scottish club in the Champions League and that club (Celtic) will have to qualify for the league stages. This will be another significant loss in income for Scottish football.

Without Rangers in the top flight Scottish football is dead.

Bigbaloobear

Agree3 Disagree1

Has anyone watched 3rd division football? These are the 33rd to 42nd best teams in Scotland. To put it into context with a population 10 times larger this is equivilent to playing the 400th best team in England! If Rangers fans wanted to watch football of this standard they would follow their local club.

Agree1 Disagree2

Hi Ian. My thoughts are RFC in the 3rd Division is truly a brand new business and we will need to cut our cloth accordingly albeit with support of a benefactor who can provide sufficient working capital to ensure the club can achieve back-to-back promotions across that 3 to 4 year period and thus be significantly better than the opposition in front of us.

Think back to how Gretna achieved their asecent from the rd to the SPL although lets ignore the consequence of their "buying" of rapid promotion. Effectively they bought the best 1st and 2nd Division players to play in the 3rd... and SPL journeymen and the best of the 1st to play in the 1st and 2nd disvisions...

So I am working on the assumption we have a new owner - be that TBK or Miller - or maybe even someone else - who fills that role as it will probably be necessary as I am sure our gates wil fall dramatically ...easily less than 10K.

I have constantly banged on about how fickle our supporters are. They bitch and moan and claim if we all invest £X we - the Supporters - would own the club. Time and time again has proved a large majority of Rangers fans lack the conviction to back up the words i.e. Murray's last Sares Issue...The numerous fighting funds post administration which the WS fronted one has generated a paltry £450K....something I hate to say but must acknowledge our city neighbours are far better and more committed at doing for their club...

So Ian - you're right we will MISS the SPL income but with a modestly wealthy benefactor in place who can steer is us through the SFL....I think they can lay the foundation for then selling / floating the NEWCO Rangers to a far wealthier Custodian for re-entering the SPL and attempts to reclaim our [rightful] position!

SPM

Agree0 Disagree0

SPM

You make some good points however you speak about Gretna (Gone) there was Livingston also who paid their way to the SPL and managed to get a European place and look at them know.

You have a lot of if's and buts in your statement and I just cant see it being that easy for you to come back that quick.

Dont get me wrong I would rather you remain in the SPL albeit with sanctions against you.

Teams like Hearts, Motherwell, Dundee Utd would get stronger with no Rangers but then Celtic would get weaker. All that would happen is Celtic would have the pick of the best in the SPL as anyone outside Scotland would not want to come for the foreseeable future.

So to sum up my opinion Rangers should remain in the SPL but with some sort of sanctions against them until they are in a position to run on their own two feet without any form of CVA etc.

Ian

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 12:02:28
I cannot believe the false indignation
Rangers fans are claiming. You got off
very lightly by SFA as usual. You should
have at least been also banned from
Scottish cup for not paying Dundee Utd
What did you get? Transfer embargo
well you were unlikely to have much cash
to buy players anyway. a wee fine and
12 months to pay.. ye gods ...
Also msm trying to lay all blame at
whyte's door.. well Murray and all your
other directors are more guilty, here is
why...
Rangers tax case says that a total
of 65 players (yes 65 Rangers players)
were on EBT's not one or two..
In 2005 the ENTIRE Rangers team that
won the league were on EBT's
(Mr Ogilvie you were at Ibrox then, care
to comment?)
Your team has cheated for years on
Tax, Vat, NI, PAYE etc.. stop bleating
and take your watered down medicine
bears, in any other country the
football authorities would have closed
you down years ago... Timalloy

Believable9 Unbelievable8

Timalloy can you honestly say you have never remember never been paid cash in your hand for any work you have done ,you and thousands of other , you are the first people to complain when more tax is added onto petrol fags and drink ,you know the government screw the working people every chance they get but just accept it doug

Agree4 Disagree2

OP
nothing bitter there then?

bill72

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:59:38
As much as the transfer embargo seems shocking, surely there is a chance to put a positive spin on it? If, and it's a big if, we can find a buyer and come out of this with a CVA we aren't exactly going to be players in transfer market for years to come. Use the 12 months to steady the ship (as much as possible in the short space of time). It means there will not be any big fee's players, not that there has been for a while. Also the younger players, with whom we have already invested time and money can have the chance to progress, plus they will be on less wages than new signings. It's the chance to use Murray Park properly, we are seeing the result in young players like Perry, Ness, McCabe etc. Any buyer put off from this ban, in my opinion, doesn't have "the best interests of the club at heart". They are proposing to buy a wounded club for which there is no quick fix, so stick at it and lets run this club in the correct manner.

Reno

Believable7 Unbelievable4

Very sensible outlook mate..........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree3

And with no european football and the liklihood of not making the top 6 which will in turn drive away your fans, where do you think the money will come from to build from scratch and work your way up?

Agree0 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 11:56:04
Will Ng be interested in rebidding now RFC playing juinior football next season?

Believable3 Unbelievable3

24 Apr 2012 11:55:11
anybody think the reason tbk are not naming all off their members is so they can pay as little cash back to the creditors under a cva if their bid is the winner?

Believable1 Unbelievable3

They dont have a bid in and are unlikely to now!

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:49:56
It breaks me to say this , but we are f£cked lads, there is no saving RFC, to many people with ulterior motives want us buried an there's jack p!sh we can do about it, from all our avenues of income been systematically shut down, to shyte an his refusal to pay anything or anyone, then there's the dick Murray who's barely getting a bad word wrote in rags about himself,with his contacts etc, he knew NOTHING of Craig whytes M-O, please ,ENOUGH of the sh!t talk., an judging by mccoists comments in Sunday's paper he knew this transfer ban was coming. Fair play to the fans who are able to follow a newco just like that, really don't think I will be able to do the same, and I will be interested to see how Murray and the rest think they can carry on living an breathing when the inevitable happens.
Paul(distraught)RFC

Believable10 Unbelievable1

I'd love to say keep believin' PaulRFC, but I'm almost 100% in agreement with you

Think i'll take up bowls!

bill72

Agree7 Disagree1

Totally agree Paul,we are being treated like MUSHROOMS! We as the fans are the ones that need the truth. SDM you alone have ruined our club.BLUNTRU72 LLRFC

Agree2 Disagree0

Paul i,ll be honest here that i think they,ll take away our licence and there wont be any club at all and we will need to re apply to the league its that bad and this is how its been managed this way....yes managed
my hope is that the rangers fans are seen and must be seen in driving murray out of the country
myself paul i,ve said to you before i,ll see you and get a pint with you in elgin berwick stenhousemuir or anywhere else
christ there,s people coming all over ulster and england to see rangers games,the least we can do is go to cowdenbeath,methill or east stirling
why....for our kids for your kids if you have any....i wont be bossed around by these people.....no defeatist talk paul gather up your anger and apply it and move on.....watp.....les

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 11:46:41
There's a saying I use which I think a lot of us Fellow Bears should attempt to use and live by...

"Nothing is ever as bad as it seems because nothing is really ever as good as it seems"

Say it a few times and understand its meaning.

Last night I posted a few times and was clearly incensed by the SFA's decision. I forgot my own saying. Overnight and after looking at the SFA's Code and allowing some objectivity to come into my OWN thought process I am a little more accepting of what has happened.

Firstly, when you read the codes we have breached and the penalties passed, in all cases I really cannot see what other option the SFA had. Sure they did not need to impose the MAXIMUM financial penalty in every case but Bears let's be honest, we ARE in Admninistration and we have been guilty of the breaches which occurred.

A £160K FINE to be paid within 12 months is really minimal in the grand scheme of things...

The financial penalties are what they are - what tipped me over the edge was the additional ruling passing a 12-month transfer embargo. That was NOT necessary.

I realise one of the Ed's on this Forum does not regard the embargo a big deal but for me it is. We WILL lose top players. We do have SOME good youth players BUT whilst we may not have the skill and experience of a McGregor, Naismith or Bocanegra next season we will need some OLD HEADS to support the McCabes, Ness's, Hutton, Little's etc and that is where the SFA ruling will be very detrimental.

We know there will be no big transfer war chests available next season but I certainly believe there will be some monies made available. Monies which could be used to buy and pay some decent pros who could help steady the ship as phase one of our rebuilding begins.

So in order to not distract D&P from getting the future well-being of the Club over the line before the end of this month...AND IT HAS TO BE BEFORE THE END OF THIS MONTH IF WE ARE CONSIDERING NON-LIQUIDATION....then lets show some dignity and accept the financial penalty but strongly appeal for the Transfer Embargo to be rescinded.

Privately, we should also never forget the timing of the SFA's announcement which may yet prove to have repercusions for RFC from which we may never recover. However lets assume we do survive...and as we grow strong again, lets never, ever forget the SFA's actions....who clearly forget the contribution made by Rangers [and Celtic] for over 100 years. Without the Old Firm, the SFA would be no more than a bunch of junior league blazers.

SPM

Believable5 Unbelievable2

@SPM; nice to see you back on your game mate.Another problem transfer wise might be when Rapid are due the balance of the jelavic cash.more sanctions? Walter did say that no money was owed to rapid,lies or lied to? What was the deal re jelavic to everton? Up front(which i doubt) or payments?............green jhedi {Ed001's Note - half up front the rest spread over the course of a few seasons.}

Agree1 Disagree1

Why should Rangers be allowed to sign players when they did not pay the fees due for previous signings?

Agree4 Disagree1

Cheers GJ...yup emotions running high last night. Have a couple of good, close friends within Ibrox and they alongwith all ordinary employees within Ibrox are the innocent victims of this shambles...

repercusisons for them are really far greater than anything else...sometimes its forgotten there are ordinary people with livelihoods at stake who unlike the footballers, will not easily find new employment once decisions are taken as how - and in what form - this club moves forward.

Heard a journo on Clyde last week refer to them as "Collateral damage"...pretty insensitive!

Anyway, we are not dead YET...so we need to keep rational heads...too many battles to fight so lets concentrate on the MAIN one....

As I have said before, I really wish we had a Dempsey like you guys had in your hour of need...and a wee guy in a bunnet :-)

Agree3 Disagree1

2.)
this beginning to P me off

NO TEAM pays the money up front
if you haven't got something constructive to say - do one!

bill72

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:41:16
Why should the present players be made to suffer for something that they had nothing to do with,by all means fine and ban the guilty parties but why should the fans suffer as they have paid good money to not just Rangers but at least 60% of the clubs in Scotland to watch their games,I think we the fans will stand by the club at home games but I for one will NEVER go to an away match in Scotland ever again,once again I think the true fans are the ones who are suffering most with this punishment,it might take a few years but WE WILL RETURN EVEN STRONGER and we will NEVER forgive the SFA for giving us sfa in support also the SPL

Believable1 Unbelievable3

You might find out that other fans will NEVER visit you cheating b******s again at Ibrox!

Agree2 Disagree3

What did the governing body of the game do to you? NOTHING.They governed the game and punished rule breakers.What did you expect?.........green jhedi

Agree4 Disagree4

1.) suits us
if you give the Club a chance we'll fill the place ourselves - -we do most weeks anyway

bill72

Agree2 Disagree1

2.)
punished - not a problem
fairly - would argue that strongly
disrepute - - don't think you really need to look to far from your front door GJ

bill72

Agree1 Disagree1

@4; Jeeze bill.have a day off from Lennon! The officials stories conflicted,and he was punished(two games)You do realise you could have been thrown out of the cup next year?..........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 11:40:12
RANGERS have suspended forward Kyle Lafferty for two weeks following a breach of discipline.

Reports in this morning's press carried details of a fall-out between the Northern Ireland striker and manager Ally McCoist ahead of Saturday's game at Hearts.

And the club has today confirmed the 24-year-old's punishment which effectively ends his season early.

Lafferty has been struggling with hamstring and groin problems since the start of 2012 after being plagued by back issues in the second half of last year.

But he recently returned to action and scored the clincher from the penalty spot in a 3-1 win over St Mirren on April 7.

He did not travel to Edinburgh for the next match at Tynecastle though and his club ban sees him miss meetings with Celtic, Dundee United and Motherwell.

Although he could be available for the friendly game at Linfield and the final SPL fixture at St Johnstone, he is lacking fitness and is therefore unlikely to be picked.

Lafferty has scored seven times for Gers in 22 appearances for the team this season, including the third goal in the 4-2 victory over Celtic in September.

Since moving to Ibrox from Burnley in June 2008, the Ulsterman has struck 38 times in 137 appearances.

Source: RFC website

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 11:35:10
Transfer embargo will be dropped as soon as Craig Whyte has departed the scene

Believable2 Unbelievable9

Course it will
*********

bill72

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 11:32:03
Cannot believe sanctions imposed by SFA. When Portsmouth done something similar with a unfit owner/admin what happened to them? What about Motherwell?
Lets be honest here the prob with Rangers is the BTC which we are innocent until proven guilty. Rangers paying the price for being the greatest team in Scotland. Nothing but jealousy is driving these shocking penalties imposed by SFA. The SFA & SPL have done everything they possibly could to strike blows to takeover/survival...twice now when preferred bidder about to be anounced SPL/SFA have made announcements the night before...coincidence? think not.
They are determined to destroy the league as without Rangers, in 3 years it will be on a par with the Welsh league.
I 100% agree Rangers deserved to be punished for admin...10 points justified and on a par with other teams. Cost us a title. As for unfit and proper persons? Surely a fine of £100k is more than enough giving the circumstances?
Well done all the Rangers haters in Scottish football...use have put the final nail in your own coffin...just a few years later than ours. f**k the SFA...WATP

Believable6 Unbelievable4

What a load of rubbish.blame murray and whyte no one else. rules broken mean punishment,why cant you see that........green jhedi

Agree5 Disagree4

Look, find somewhere dark and lie down for twenty minutes. then READ the sfa judgement. if you still agree with what you posted, see a doctor.
sell up and pay what you owe, how about that ?

Agree2 Disagree1

Seems to me that the posters that reckon that the demise of Rangers equals the demise of Scottish football are too young to remember when Greig managed Rangers or Macari managed Celtic . Other teams prospered and the National team qualified for tournament finals . You're neither of you as important as you think .

Paddy Malarkey

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:31:23
how do we get a protest off to UEFA to investigate whether the SFA are fit and proper people to be running a National football organization? Surely the SFA has a duty of care to its member clubs and broken their own rules by not investigating whether C.Whyte was a fit and proper person to run a football club, they are the policing authority so it was their responsibility. On other matters the club returned accounts which should up the EBT payments if there was any doubt about these SFA have to be again found guilty of a dereliction of duty to their member clubs at the very least with a very strong case for collusion that they did so knowingly to boost the coefficient and other clubs could benefit to the tune of millions of pounds. Illegally competing in competitions on the back of a falsely gained coefficient.This will also bring in FIFA who will of course take action against the Incompetent in my opinion SFA for fielding in-eligible players who were not properly registered for the National team.

CAN OF WORMS WELLAND TRULY OPENED

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Ok, i believe we have more to lose by bringing in outside bodies.
I think in the past the sfa have been leniant towards us. We cant afford players t the moment so its not all bad, it just looks like the sfa are being bad..... they havent imposed anything other than what we knew!

When we NEWco we will be able to sign players for the new rangers!

BluePeter

Agree0 Disagree3

This is without a doubt the most delusional post i have ever seen.Rangers(murray)did not conduct a proper due diligence on whyte(or did not care and was desperate to sell) so it was rangers responsibility.Your EBT theory is flawed as the whole case hinges on "secret" second contracts,how would the SFA know about them?You should be worried about ogilvie who seems to right in the middle of this with rangers and the SFA............green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Apr 2012 11:28:16
Does anyone know how many years it will take before Linfield become the most succesful team in the world...another record gone..

Believable1 Unbelievable4

24 Apr 2012 11:27:26
hi im not a rangers fan but i hope you guys get things soted out . but one thing i would like to say is that would liqiudation not be the best thing so that u guys can start again debt free rather than try and keep the current rangers going with all this debt.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 11:25:53
If the SFA are saying that Craig Whyte is not a fit and proper person to run a football club and have banned him from association football for life why was he even allowed to be in that position in the first place?

In less than a year hes put us into administration and too the brink of liquidation!

Believable3 Unbelievable0

The sfa turned a blind eye to him, hoping he had the money he said he did!

BP
BluePeter

Agree3 Disagree0

Cw did not put us in this situation.....sdm did along with all his cronies who were taking money and mismanaging what was left.
cw has not helped the situation with his actions but ask yourelf this.....
if sdm hadnt let his ego go wild and chase an unacheivable goal(which i bought into as much as every other rangers fan) would we be staring at the chance that our beloved club would be no more.

also ask why has sdm escaped any criticism in the press "succulent lamb and finest wines" comes to mind

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:17:10
Do we believe, in our heart of hearts, that it's all over? And do we really, really care? How do we explain the malaise over our plight where every road now seems to lead to liquidation? Are we tired of season after season which is basically trundling through games punctuated by brief adrenalin surges of Old Firm games? Do we feel like we have better things to spend our money on, more valuable ways to spend our time? Have we already moved on from 140 years of history, already started healing and looking ahead to a brave new future of more sedate Saturdays and Sundays, a longer life free of the stress of either praying for the final whistle or that extra few minutes of injury time to pull back an equaliser or get a winner?

Are we just so weary of the whole debacle – which has been hanging over us for years now – that a newco in the 3rd Division would actually be quite exciting? A new challenge, developing youth, no longer propping up Scottish football at the ‘top’ level, relishing the Schadenfreude of our friends across the city and the whole country as they fail to anticipate their own diminishing status as the calibre of players willing to consign themselves to a league without the lure of the Old Firm games falls steadily over the years?

Now’s the time Bears... it’s newco or nothing almost certainly and we need to demonstrate some intent either way for our sakes and the sake of our new owner[s] if any...

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Dear me,so sure the world will end because of your club.It wont...........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:12:47
RST calling for boycott of Scotland team, SFA sponsors and calling for protest at Scottish Cup final.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

So they'll call for a protest against the SFA but there have been no protests at Ibrox etc.? Typical - blame everyone else.

Agree3 Disagree3

Nice to see them move a bit.........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 11:08:50
Craig Whyte has a total cheek with his so-called demands, representative on the board and directors box seats for life?

We don't want him anywhere near Ibrox anytime in the future and especially nothing to do with any new board. He has ripped our club apart, stolen from the club and the fans yet still he believes he has done nothing wrong.

Absolute t**t, good riddence to him.

Wullie

Believable3 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 11:02:25
i have heard that bill miller will be the new rangers owner shortly,we will be a new co that is debt free with no transfer embargo,no fines,we will have ibrox and murray park to use our history will be intact,i feel ok about this not overjoyed but glad this soap opera is coming to an end soon,does anyone know bill millers wealth,i know he has been linked to mega rich club 9,when i try to find out stuff about bill miller i draw a blank hes like craig whyte do you know anything ed

Believable0 Unbelievable5

Who told you this rubbish? cos that is what it is..........green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree2

His wealth is off the radar@ kieth jackson...col

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 11:00:50
Is it just me or does the rangers fans threats of boycotting SPL sponsors seem futile and misguided?Since the news broke,late last night,of the transfer ban much wailing and gnashing of teeth has been heard from many.There is no doubt that Craig Whyte has been nothing short of a disaster for rangers,check out his response to the sanctions,but if you break the rules there has to be punishment.Of course the fans had nothing to do with this,but the custodians of the club did.Two men,decades apart,have caused this.Firstly the fiver for a tenner man himself,david murray.Secondly,the man who came with a plan,probably liquidation,Craig Whyte.Both have been complicit in rangers woes,murray starting the process and Whyte looking to have ended it.Almost predictably the Daily Record has lined up squarely in the murray camp,Jim Traynor is of course a good friend of his.But to mention murray only very briefly in his piece today,is wrong.He also seems to think that scottish football has "abused and abandoned" rangers.That glee amongst other clubs fans is acceptable,but that glee in the boardrooms is wrong.Why Jim? When rangers started the whole EBT fiasco they started a chain reaction in Scotland.A chain of debt,a chain of foreign imports and a chain of clubs getting into debt which even today is still a millstone round their collective necks.During murray's reckless years how many teams were cheated out of trophies,euro places and hard cash by a team who were playing players that they could not afford? When murray first put rangers up for sale he was hardly swamped with offers.For four years he saw this coming and,in his desperation to sell,took a POUND(little clue their gers fans) for a club that was carrying an unsustainable level of debt. You have to feel for the decent rangers fans in this,but my god they have enough fan groups didnt any of them smell a rat? The rangers tax case blog has been pointing out possible problems for nearly EIGHTEEN MONTHS as has Phil Mac,but that was timmy just being jealous or stirring it.Much better to believe Traynor,Jackson et al with the Billionaire taking over nonsense.Now Traynor says the rangers fans wont forget this and nor should they.Well Jim do you think the Scottish Press might have a part top play in this? Sloppy,tired reporting with PR people slipping press releases into bad reporters hands to be printed as exclusives.Why didnt the fans groups do some research? Why cheer Whyte into ibrox as a hero? Because Keith Jackson said so! So if you want to protest,start at the Record offices,they are as guilty as most in this.......

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Love to know who posted this.I wrote and posted it this morning on the Celtic site!......green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree4

24 Apr 2012 11:00:20
Ed what happens to Mr tights shares if he's banned for life? {Ed001's Note - he still owns them, but he would be unable to be legally involved in making decisions at the club and would be expected to sell them or pass them on to someone else.}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 10:54:07
Rangers supporters trust urging players not to play for Scotland, where have these guys been the last year when the fans really needed them? I've seen Gordon smith more, play for Scotland don't ruin your careers guys.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

That just shows the RST up for the chumps they are.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 10:50:33
have we become the submissive fans who just talk and talk and take no action we need to be active NOW we need to set up and start intensive protests not 50 but 50,000 of us NOW stand up and be counted stop talking lets hit the streets the sfa offices or do we just sit back talk sh*** and let the club die...because we are so so close to that scenario where are all these Rangers organisations that like to be assossiated with the club wear the ties and go to the fancy functions. nows your chance to show who you really are and what we are all about....we are a wordwide institution and we DO have the power and the influence to survive and then prosper the last chance to save the Gers doesnt lie with the BKs or any other investor..its with US the fans..and the time has come TODAY to save our club or we die ....and when you die...we all know we dont come back....someone may look like you...but you are dead.....last chance bears...very last chance. its now or NEVER

Believable6 Unbelievable1

Worldwide? hardly........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 10:48:09
If Rangers are liquidated, theyre players contracts transfer to the SFA.

With the ruling last night (no signings for 12 months). This means that if a newco rises, and want to be reinstated to the SPL, as they would need to have players to make up a team. They can only buy players who are 18 years old or younger!!

The only way Rangers can avoid this sanction affecting them is to disappear completely. Then a new football team may be formed (with no history) start at the bottom, then they can sign whoever they want!

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Wrong...transfer embargo will follow you to a Newco.

Agree1 Disagree1

A newco cant sign new players either.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 10:34:49
This is a shameful decision that has been taken with the sole purpose of crippling Rangers Football Club. It is completely unacceptable and fans groups will be meeting to explore how we jointly express our opposition to this decision in the strongest possible terms. This could include protesting at Hampden on on the day of the Scottish Cup Final as well as boycotting SFA sponsors William Hill, Carling and Vauxhall. All options are on the table and no Rangers player or supporter can credibly play in or support the national side until this ridiculous decision is reversed.

Hitting Rangers in this way is in stark contrast to the soft justice dished out to Neil Lennon last week for a string of offences in which he questioned the integrity of the referees and officials. The SFA appears to have one set of rules for one club yet a completely different set for the other.

Despite calls to delay this action the SFA persisted with this case while the club was not in a position to adequately defend itself and had the SFA done its job in the first place on Craig Whyte then this entire saga could have been avoided.

Rangers supporters are appalled by this decision which brings shame on the SFA and the national game.

Source: RST

Believable3 Unbelievable3

The rst should be ashamed of themselves.They NEVER questioned murray, indeed it seems that a custard cream and a cup of tea with him in ibrox made everything ok.They also welcomed whyte without any question or checking,even though the web was full of stories about him.Now they want to mobilise! your several months behind im afraid.Nice to see you deflect your appalling leadership by bringing Lennon into it,well done.Had murray or YOUR ORGANISATION checked on whyte this might not have happened.Whyte is ramgers and rangers is whyte im afraid,break rules,get punished,end of story.But you got some cheek to think you are blameless and i hope all decent true bluenoses see right through these clowns..........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree2

It is Rangers that have brought shame to the game in Scotland. Take your punishment like a man.

Agree4 Disagree2

Give it a fxcking break. Neil Lennon has nothing to do with it. We told yous for months what was coming but naw all we got back was 4 in a row. You wouldn't listen a blind man could see Craig Whyte was a crook but naw he has a big war chest lol. Leave Neil out of it. Find someone else to hate and blame. Celtic Champions bigirishmac

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 10:30:54
I cant believe the leader of the rangers supporters the bald guy who is always on the telly the noo is saying that the sfa are biased ffs although they are the maximum fines if ye go bust ye wont pay them anyway as for the transfers thats getting off lightly ye could huv been chucked oot

Believable3 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 10:30:12
Good Morning,
It's another difficult start to the day for us gers fans, I don't have any rumours just some ideas.
In terms of the SFA's decision I wonder if there are course of action open to us in response, all gers fans should boycott all games at Hampden whether club or country, we could ask any remaining Scottish players at Ibrox not to play for our country,withdraw all support for any SFA media initiatives and campaigns.None of this will hurt SFA initially, but longer term it could force the organisation responsible for the decline in Scottish Football to be more consistent and accountable.
As for the administrators having read many of the posts here we do seem to be missing a major point, the biggest asset Rangers have are us, and yet we are are not being heard at any level, politicians,the sports administrators or the clowns currently in charge. I believe due to time constraints we now have limited options however there are some avenues open to us;
1 Write/email your MSP/MP stating your disbelief that a sporting institution that has brought employment,pride and money to Scotland is being disassembled without elected representatives of our country having say or representing the fans anguish.
2. Contact HMRC directly and demand that they investigate immediately the competence of the administrators, as although they may be answerable to a court, any answering will happen after Rangers have been destroyed, it is not to late for HMRC to take over the process, it may come to the same conclusion but at least we will know what we are left with and how we can move forward.
3. Contact FSA and demand written response from Lloyds TSB in reference to them accepting payment from Ticketus without revealing to the board that the monies did not come from CW.
4.Withdraw all away support, I understand this will also impact on our team but we must show the authorities a strength of will.
5. Pay for an open letter in the press from the fighting to fund to find a firm who can quickly set up a share issue for the purchase of Rangers by the fans, this can be done much quicker than the press and doom and gloomers would have you believe, perhaps in this current climate a City Firm seeing the support available for this option would jump at the chance to create a fan led Rangers, plus it would keep the wolves at bay for now.

That's my rant pretty much over, doesn't make me feel any better as until we have a leader/spokesperson to get behind I feel that the might of our support is not being felt by the powers at be much to my dismay, perhaps others on here or other forums can suggest such a person or organisation and lets get our support mobilised while we still have a chance.
More than ever WE have to lead the outcome and stop being led by people who at this point have not shown our best interests at heart.WATP

Believable3 Unbelievable2

Seems everybody who could lead you are pretty silent.All EBT users perhaps?.........green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 10:29:49
Once again the time for honesty is upon us. Every time I read the paper or turn on the TV someone is on complaining that Rangers are being punished for the actions of Craig Whyte. Craig Whyte is the majority shareholder at Ibrox he owns 85% of the shares, for all intents and purposes he is Rangers. His actions are the actions of the owner of the club, we cannot separate the two. If our players misbehave on the park like last year in the Scottish cup, we as a club will be punished. The same rules apply to the owners and the board. Whyte, when running our club stole money from absolutely everybody (If you obtain goods and services that you do not intend to pay for it is theft).

As for the Blue Knights do they actually have any money?

Bill Miller is sounding the most untrustworthy of all of them. He is described as a Turnaround Specialist who saves ailing companies and takes them back into profit. Craig Whyte was also described as a Turnaround specialist when he arrived last year. As anyone in business will tell you Turnaround Specialist is a euphemism for ASSET STRIPPER.

The time has come to accept liquidation, start afresh and have the club owned by the fans. If we are going to protest about anything it should be to demand to know why Craig Whyte has not been charged with fraud (both personal and corporate)

This whole sorry mess should act as a warning to all football clubs, both in terms of living within your means and what to do if you are not doing so. Administration is a complicated business best handled by experts. However football is not a normal business. When Woolworths went bust people shopped elsewhere its not the same when clubs go bust. The customers are also fans who will go to great lengths for their team, and who dont understand why anyone else involved with the club will not do the same. The point Im making is that a football club need administrators who understand football I do not believe that Duff & Phelps have that understanding!

That being said I think its not wise to change horses mid-stream. Apart from anything else I dont think we could afford to. New administrators would need time for their own period of due diligence which would delay things even more!

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Very sensible

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 10:28:04
sorry. but if you buy the club to fold it, what have you actually bought, uuuum, nothing. dead and buried, no mug willl touch this thing.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 10:27:39
the sfa throw the book at rangers because of whyte duping them, but when they get duped[march 29th , whytes lawyers ask for more time to prepare a case they were never going to,april 6th,non appearence] off him who throws the book at them

Believable1 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 10:26:18
Rangers fans need to follow through with the threat to boycott the scottish cup and scotland teams sponsors products and services to protest against the punishments we are facing for Whyte's reign. I know where I will not be placing bets or what lager I will not be drinking from now on! {Ed001's Note - why? What are you upset about? Rangers broke the rules and are being punished, rightly so. What exactly is your problem?}

Believable1 Unbelievable3

So who is going to sponsor Rangers in the future, Co-op Funeral Services?

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 10:24:48
cant believe the way this is going ,
i dont blame anybody apart from
sdm and whyte for this wtf is
happening here, also admins i dont
understand why people blame them
when obviously there are no alternatives
. i hate this pi5h about not going
to away grounds etc why im a
rangers fan its not my fault this
has happened ive paid anything
that came my way p.s i also
dont blame spl/sfa what are they
supposed to do we cant be above
the rules...... also ally why play an injured player
come on to feck now its turning into
an absolute fairytale with a shocking ending
...
always am will be be blue
a very pi55ed off
craig+babybear

Believable3 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 10:47:25
The Rangers Supporters Trust have accused the Scottish Football Association judicial panel of trying to "cripple" their club after they were hit with a 12-month transfer embargo on signing players over 17 and a £160,000 fine. (source BBC)

Believable1 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 10:45:15
given that the club (not the support) are we are now 'guilty' of bringing the scottish game into direpute (u havina laugh?)
will these fines be used to pay of the creditors, especially the other clubs

bill72

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Are you having a laugh . SFA are Fining Rangers . Therefore ALL money owed to other clubs will still be owed by Rangers to the other clubs .Why would the SFA fine a team then pay outstanding bill with them??? Get Real numpty.

Agree1 Disagree0

NO.Why should the SFA pay your creditors?.......green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 10:40:56
The SFA have banned us from signing players for 1 year, can anyone explain what happens to the players who's contracts end in the summer like Aluko, can he be resigned or have his contract extended? or must he leave the club?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

He can sign an extension. It doesn't matter as he'll probably leave anyway when a bigger wage offer come in.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 10:40:08
I would just like to thank the SFA for their efforts in pushing Rangers towards extinction

Hopefully all Celtic fans who were foolish enough to beleive that the SFA were in Rangers pockets will reassess that opinion after the SFA's farcical punishments handed out to Rangers

Its now obvious that the only way forward for Rangers is to stick two fingers up at the SFA and leave Scotland to start afresh as the SFA are hell bent on making sure Scottish football dies

Believable3 Unbelievable3

So they shouldn't have handed out any punishment?

Agree2 Disagree0

Trains, planes and automobiles...just make sure you lot don't stop off in Manchester; they're still trying to put parts of it back together. Head further South where wee Craigy has a club down...where you could get straight into 19th level of English Football.

Agree3 Disagree1

Rangers are the only ones guilty of anything....tax avoidance/evasion,2nd player contracts,ebts,unaudited accounts,a string of unpaid creditors,unpaid national insurance,unfit owner etc....rangers past dealings have finally caught up with them

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:26:01
What is happening to try and find our missing millions? Lloyds paid £18M..........WHERE IS THE REST? Are dumb and dumber still on the case???

Believable2 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 09:21:57
Loads of Celtic fans on the page i see.
Anyway my.main point is rangers should move down to England now. Sfa clearly don't care i hope miller moves us into English 2nd division. Give us 4 years we will be up there with man u and the other big boys of Europe whilst Celtic Will playing dunfermiline in front of 6000. Regan well and the press can have Scottish football time to move on.

Believable2 Unbelievable4

U cant ply in another country, how many times to u need to be told?

Agree3 Disagree0

What did you want the SFA to do? Turn a blind eye?

Joeshmo1888

Agree4 Disagree0

What planet are you on. No chance. Nada no way hosey. And that was before you wrecked Madchester.

Agree2 Disagree0

Dear God.How deluded must you be to post that? Not even the good grace to start in the conference but the second div!Get it straight,Why would England want you Even if UEFA allowed it?............green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree0

Wouldn't be League 2 anyway. Conference North 4th or something like that probably - work from the bottom up which should take about 10 years at least. Good luck trying.

Agree2 Disagree0

Look u nugget they dont want you they dont want any scottish team told that a million times f*** sake

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:21:26
The timing of the last two major announcments by the SFA have shown either their total stupidity or their agenda to put the boot right in to our club.

Although it pains me to say this, it looks more likely that our club will be liquidated.

If this were to happen, I for one would like to step away from the muppets at the SFA and the other small clubs that are out to hurt us in our time of need and try and start again in the english league.

might as well build our club back up in a better league than fester with a group that obviously dont want us or value our contributions to their coffers.

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Cos England are just gonna roll out the welcome mat eh? Do you people know anything about football?............green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:12:57
can never take away the memories WE HAD THE WORLDS BIGGEST FOOTBALL PARTY 240000 singing and dancing on what was a great occasion (apart form handful of idiots) Everybody came back with at least ONE good memory and a smile on their face

Believable3 Unbelievable4

Handfull?? You must have big hands!!

Joeshmo1888

Agree5 Disagree0

Great stuff.where are they all now you need cash? Ten quid a head is a lot of money........green jhedi

Agree2 Disagree0

1 pound a head and they will be able to pay the fine from the sfa and have change to pay others davie c

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:07:36
Hope rangers remember this everybody has put the boot in including their granny I for one will not be in away game next season if the rangers are still hear total boycott for me it is cw that did this not the fans so the fans get shafted f..k the sfa ... Kenny bluenose watp

Believable2 Unbelievable2

There might not be any away games for you to go to Kenny

Agree1 Disagree0

Dry your eyes Kenny and take the punishment you deserve, and theres more on the way. EBT's will see you stripped of the titles you cheated to win.

TonyBhoy!

Agree1 Disagree0

Might be better boycotting,Elgin and Brechin are tiny..........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:07:33
ed whats ur take on all this transfer embargo m8? theres alot of panic here and understanably so, but i personally cant see it affecting us any harder than with no embargo, lets face it there was never gonna be a "warchest" for nxt season was there? it means we must use our youth players now, theres no other option, but they will play with more heart than weve seen from alot of first team! {Ed001's Note - I just don't see any issue with it, the club has no money anyway, it just means that the manager can now get that us against them attitude into the players. If anything that should enable them to get results out of proportion to their ability. Also means every youngster in the country will see Rangers as the team to join to give themselves the best chance of a first team future.}

Believable2 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 09:02:07
Can anyone clear this up for me if we are banned from signing players does this also stop us from resigning players we already have who are out of contract during the time of the ban. {Ed001's Note - no, you can extend and give new contracts to players registered with the club already.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 10:09:41
Lets get one thing clear. Rangers going down the tubes is not the fault of anyone except the people who have been running the club into the ground for the past 20 odd years IE SDM and la
tterly CW. Rangers deserve the punnishments handed down from the SFA ( and more will be comming next week from SPL ) If punnishments were not seen to be appropriate , you could shut down Scottish football . The SFA and SPL MUST mammer rangers for the good of the game as a whole . Of course everybody will suffer to a lesser degree But people will just have to get on with it .

Believable4 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 10:08:01
Following todays fines etc I think the big L seems the best option. Apply to the sfl for a place in the 3rd division and get ourselves back where we belong via hard work. 3 years hurt for a team we love surely isn't too bad. Tell the spl to shove their sanctions and see how they get on without us(no sky tv, no overpriced ticket prices when we visit etc) I've a feeling we won't be the only team applying for the 3rd division. Might do Scottish football the world of good in the long term and cause a revamp of the set up. I've did for years a country this size has no need for 4 leagues.
GVanW

Believable4 Unbelievable1

That won't happen. But a shake-up is needed anyway. A larger SPL say 16 teams with relegation and Euro play-offs. Another 2 divisions of 16 with automatic relegation to lower league structures.

A simple vote by teams whether to allow a newco back in. Turkeys won't vote for Christmas.

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh they will vote ,they want the money the Rangers fans spend in their grubby wee grounds .Rangers will rise from the ashes,WE ARE SCOTTISH FOOTBALL.fXXK the sfa,shower of old duffers,hang your heads in shame.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 10:07:30
Ed - your thoughts please on the new take on succulent lamb bombshell from CW - "Whyte said: "It's a joke, a complete joke. They've never spoken to me.

"Stewart Regan (chief executive) and Campbell Ogilvie (president) had dinner with me in November they told me it wouldn't be a problem.

Any one any idea why the CEO of the SFA and former Rangers Director and EBT benificiery Campbell Ogilvie and now President of the SFA; would be meeting with CW. Sounds very odd and not what you would expect from the chief custodians of our National game. {Ed001's Note - it is perfectly reasonable for them to meet on a personal level.}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

How do you not know Mr tight is talking bulls**t about meeting these 2 guys? Everything else he has said hasn't been truthful.

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 09:59:41
If SLY pull out and break the contract then the biggest and best option being Celtic FC TV. They can screen/stream and own all their games at every level they compete in, including SPL, glamour ties with worthy opponents and get all the revenue for themselves. Would far outstrip the peanuts we get from the Sly deal. SFA/SPL will survive without the Gers and will prosper; not being shackled with bending over backwards for the Establishment team, other will get a fair crack of the whip. Well done to the Celtic Youth Team, maybe you can buy a few of these young talented players as they are under 18. {Ed001's Note - that would only help Celtic, so you are talking complete rubbish, it would make the league less competitive. Celtic would make more money, while the rest suffer and fall even further behind, how does that help? It would be like France when Lyon dominated but failed miserably in Europe because it was too easy in the league.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 09:56:42
Rule 66 - bringing the game into disrepute by any plater, official, member of a club - given Lemmons recent rants & actions SFA have to impose similar embargo on Celtic - otherwise double standards {Ed001's Note - hardly the same, if you can't see that I fear for your mental health!}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

OMG! What is it with Lennon and some of you people.It's unhealthy.worry about your own problems.........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:55:31
I give up with rangers now, the last 20 year's has all been a big lie, every trophy we have celebrated is cheated, every penny I've spent going home and away is cheated, well no more this is the day I finally say nothing, I will never step back into ibrox as I feel cheated.

Believable6 Unbelievable6

You have a season ticket to Porkdeid, so whats your point...
BB

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 09:48:47
Does anyone know if a 'newco' is formed does the transfer ban still stand, or would it be scrapped as it would technically be a new rangers?
Big C

Believable1 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 09:42:28
Another black day!

Im sorry boys but I cant see this turning out well at all now. Too much to cope with for any interested party to re-build from. IF we are bought it will be years before we recover, if we lose the case on top of everything else I fear we are finished!

GDog
WATP

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Totally agree and we seem to be blaming everybody apart from the people that done it.
craig+babybear

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:34:09
How can any Co especially in these austere times forego 17 million and only accept 10 million interest free over 9 years what is really in it for them

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Ibrox as a development site. dont believe all th crap about it only being worht money as a stadium. St Mirren sold Love Stree for £10 million so what do you think Ibrox and Murry Park are really worth?

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 09:31:39
SFA website has nothing on the Rangers fiasco as of 9.30am

What a total bunch of feckin reptiles. These feckless don't need to open doors to get into a room - they just slide on under

As for the disassociated brethren and the rest be warned - Scotland is a laughing stock and the SFA haveo only proved that to be true

Believable4 Unbelievable3

24 Apr 2012 08:56:58
THE SFA smashed Rangers with a hammer blow last night by banning the club from signing any new players for ONE YEAR.

And it was feared that the severe sanctions and a £160,000 fine could be the final nails in the coffin for the Ibrox club.

In a dramatic late-night bombshell, shamed owner Craig Whyte was also hit with a £200,000 fine and banned from working with any Scots club FOR LIFE.

The swingeing punishments for breaching SFA rules came just hours after financial experts warned fans their club were only days away from liquidation.

Last night, fears were growing that the new penalties could finally scare off the remaining two bidders for the club.

The sanctions made a mockery of outrageous demands made by Whyte just hours earlier.

He had insisted he keep a 20 per cent stake in the club, be given two directors box seats for life and could appoint two people to the new board.

But last night he hit back: I couldnt care less. It makes no difference to my life whatsoever and good luck collecting the money.

Its a joke. It is very harsh on Rangers. I am surprised at how harsh the SFA have been on a club which is going through tough times.

Stewart Regan (chief executive) and Campbell Ogilvie (president) should resign and get out of Scottish
football.

The SFA want to kick Rangers when they are down. They are playing to the media.

Yesterday, administrators Duff & Phelps, who have been running the Scottish Premier League club since February 14, believed they were close to sealing a survival deal with one of the clubs potential bidders.

But a statement last night from administrator Paul Clark said: All of us working on behalf of the club are utterly shocked and dismayed by the draconian sanctions imposed on Rangers.

It appears that, on one hand, the disciplinary panel accepted our central argument that responsibility for bringing the club into disrepute lay with the actions of one individual Craig Whyte as is evident from the unprecedented punishment meted out to him.

During this hearing, the club produced compelling evidence from a number of sources that, following his takeover, Craig Whyte ran the club in a thoroughly unaccountable manner, rather than adhering to a long-established and proper form of corporate governance.

Given this evidence, it is difficult to comprehend that the disciplinary panel has seen fit to effectively punish the club even more heavily than Mr Whyte.

Any further punishment on him will have little or no impact.

However, for Rangers, a ban on signing players will seriously undermine the clubs efforts to rebuild after being rendered insolvent.

Furthermore, we do not know how bidders for the club will react to these sanctions and what effect they will have on their proposals.

Clark said the club intended to appeal against the sanctions.

The remaining two bidders for the club Paul Murray and his Blue Knights consortium and American Bill Miller were shocked at the sanctions.

If they walk away from the negotiating table, liquidation would become inevitable. Rangers fans will be incensed that the games governing body have decided to make the club pay for Whytes chicanery.

He refused to attend the SFA independent inquiry, chaired by Lord William Nimmo Smith, into his and the clubs business activities, claiming the process was farcical.

The most damaging penalty for Rangers is the ban on signing new players.

The club are likely to lose a raft of players, who in return for accepting swingeing wage cuts to keep the club going had clauses inserted into their contracts allowing them to leave on the cheap at the end of the season.

The sanctions mean manager Ally McCoist wont be able to replace any of the players.

Rangers faced five offences, including failing to abide by SFA regulations over the fit and proper persons test.

Whyte was ruled unfit by the SFA to be a club official.

Last night, SFA chief executive Stewart Regan told the Record that the governing body had no control or influence over the hearings process or verdict.

He said: This was an independent process and there was no indication from the panel until their decision was made last night.

Regan added that a special body will be set up to hear Rangers appeal.

The club are bracing themselves for further, possibly severe sanctions when the SPL meet next Monday.

The hammer blow came after a financial expert warned that Rangers had just two days left to save their future. Top accountant Neil Patey said that time to set up the preferred option to keep the club solvent a Company Voluntary Agreement is fast running out.

Any CVA requires at least five weeks to run its course.

But if Rangers ownership and a creditors deal are not resolved by June 1, the club will once again be facing losses of up to £1million a month when the deal by players to accept a temporary 75 per cent pay cut runs out.

Add to that the administrators fees which by yesterday had reached more than £1.6million and the financial picture grows ever bleaker.

Patey, of Ernst and Young, said failure to strike a deal by Thursday could lead to:

●Non-liquidation buyers walking away because of the extra debts.

● Top stars being axed if they insist on wages being hiked back to previous levels.

● Four months of further administration.

● Millions more in fees to administrators.

Patey also warned of the difficulty Whyte could pose if he decides not to hand over his shareholding without a fight.

Patey warned: I think its days and not weeks, as the June 1 deadline is quite important.

The club will then be in the close season and there will be little income coming in. And, importantly, the players wages, which were at a reduced level, will defer back to full wages.

That takes them back close to the £10million per annum operating loss that was stated when they went into administration.

Rangers fans spokesman John Macmillan said most fans were frustrated at the way the sale was being drawn out.

He said: If the red tape means that June will bring further debt issues then I suggest that everyone involved gets the finger out.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 08:41:41
This is obscene. This "independant" review panel have not considered the whole issue. They have come down on CW (why not SDM and the rest of the "crooks" SDM etc.) who put Rangers in this position? The club, under the rules, has to accept points deduction and the SFA have to show all this otherwise EUFA and FIFA will step in (and we know what that shower of balloons are like). With all the evidence out there and the requirements to take the club forward, why are they punishing the true supporters, the kids draming to be RFC players, the infirm who's only day out is to watch the team, they guys who follow the team all over the world and support through thick and thin? (I follow Celtic but believe in doing the right thing)

Believable1 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 08:25:04
So CW is the bad guy then. He has already said they can sing for their their money. What about SDM, ed. Good old DR managed to keep his name low profile through all of this yet he is the main reason Rangers are in this position. CW just finished the job off. {Ed001's Note - as far as I am concerned, and I have said this all along, Murray is the one at fault for all of this. His mess was so bad that no one could fix it without major investment.}

Believable2 Unbelievable0

Ed Rangers surely deserve the harshest sanctions no club should be allowed to get away with this kind of reckless behaviour. The most accurate desccription is "financial doping" I believe the club should lose titles and cups won during this time span.

However what is more important than all that is HMRC must get every penny owed, Tax evation on this scale is sickening and HMRC should not accept any token gestures.

The worrying thing is how big institutions can get away with this kind of thing for so long.

Tax payer

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 08:21:56
After hearing the SFA have put a transfer embargo & a fine on us, they have probably shot themselves & the rest of Scottish football in the foot. As if it wasn't bad enough, bidders will probably decide against buying us, which means liquidation, which in turn means Sky & ESPN will pull the plug on Scottish football, so called top players from certain teams will want a move out of the SPL because their teams won't be able to afford to give them decent wages because of the loss of TV revenue & of the money they generate from Rangers fans when we travel to their home games. I for one will be loving it when/if this happens, be carefull what you wish for, this is going to be so ironic, well done SFA. Stuz

Believable4 Unbelievable3

Stupid post,just stupid..........green jhedi

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 08:16:53
So cwhyte is guilty of not paying teams money owed for players, and rangers get hit with a 12 month transfer imbargo, guess what? its us the fans that have been penalised again again and again, be in no doubt that regan, lawell, thompson, petrie and riley are behind this move, we should liquidate now and apply to join the 3rd tier next season, let the rest rot in their cabal ridden league with no sky and no rangers support drip feeding them, we will pass them on the way back up!! there will always be a rangers!!!

Believable3 Unbelievable3

Is this post serious! Rangers run up huge debts, dont pay TAX an NI Contributions, put hundreds of jobs at risk with small companies who they owe money to, and guess what its all someone elses fault!

Do you really think you can steal up to £140 million and walk away scott free!

Get a grip!

Rangers till July(or Maybe June)

Agree3 Disagree0

What a stupid post.........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 07:56:54
Morning Ladies,

No signings for a year, players will be leaving for pennies (or nowt when you go into liquidation), big laugherty suspended fur slappin McCoist aboot the chins, £160k fine and Craig Whyte banned from Scottish football and fined £200k......doubt the SFA will get a penny from Gers or Whyte cos, eh....... you don't do paying up! lol

If Carlsberg did administrations......

Enjoy Percy's! pmsl

Miko x

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Are you a "lady" Miko ? Is that why you have a "KISS" after your name? if your not a bird then I'd remove it , it really is hard to take anything you say seriously!
Paul(kiss)RFC

Agree2 Disagree3

Cheers miko ,
if carlsberg did trebles............

craig+babybear

Agree1 Disagree2

24 Apr 2012 07:55:58
yet again, bemused by the actions of the sfa. craig whyte has to be treated as a sngle entity now by sfa, not as owner of gers, his actions are by him ,not club , and should now be treated as such. is it because they cant or wont deal with him, as its easier to take actions against club ?? silence is deafening from certain areas within scottish society, politicians, press, law. action has now got to be taken at a higher level against this individual, or all scottish clubs will be left open to the abuse of rogue individuals/ concortums. who will use the cw blue print as a way of making quick money, without being answerable to anybody, as its plain to see the sfa will blame the club 1st, not an individual even if he isnt the clubs choice but been burdened by him/ them !!

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Within the confines of football rangers are Craig Whyte and vice versa.The SFA had to apply sanctions to rangers and Whyte........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree0

Didn't the club welcome him with open arms?

Agree3 Disagree0

Stop blaming evryone else. Yous are always on about the Rangers Family well most families I know, including my own are responsible for the action within that family. Sorry mate but this "we're the victims" is running very thin, unlike Sally. The fact is the fans let all this happen; believing every bit of propoganda that came out from the Sir Minty PR factory, passed on by the sycophantic and lazy Scottish Press and gulped down by your many and varied Supporters Trusts; who can't even agree a line of defence. Nope, this is also down to you and the SFA have acted in accordance with the rules of the Assocation, which for 140 years you lot have dominated. More action needs to be taken against the men who have ruined your Club and have brought disrepute to our game in Scotland. First thing to do is take reseponsibility for the systematic abuse of power and finances that have got you to where you are today; it's not CFC, Dundee Utd or any other supporters fault...it lies with the Rangers Family.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 07:55:32
So has Brian Kennedy withdrawn his offer.
Does the Blue Knights have an offer to make and is Miller just blowing smoke rings.
D&P claim no unconditional offer on the table, what have these so called bidders been offering then. They keep calling for the process to speed up and for D&P to be more transparent, but now we the supporters MUST ask the bidders to do the same.
TBN's, Kennedy and Miller what have YOU asked for and how long are YOU going to drag this out??.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Non of the bidders are serious, the yare all waiting for liquidation (as the some unmentioned names)

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 07:32:21
Is the headline news from yesterday not simply that the newco route is now a complete nonstarter if you can't sign anyone for a year? I think this sanction is designed to make life easier for everyone else, particularly on the spl board (comprised of the rangers hate dreamteam of: hibs, tims, utd, sheep in the green corner and possibly 'well and st j in the blue corner) so they don't have to make that much-publicised decision between "sporting integrity" and committing financial suicide. The green corner in particular would have real difficulty justifying it to their fans (that diddy online survey confirms it, like there were ever a doubt!). They really don't want to have to make that decision it's plain to see. Tbk is much better all round in many ways. Yesterday don't really change the picture much for them- just costs £160k more. If anyone from the current squad would need to be in effect re-signed by newco gers (if they wished to stay) does yesterday no make the miller plan completely defunct?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 07:30:10
I say to all Rangers fans to stay awa y from ll away from all away grounds.. for the next twelve months..lets see the SFA SQUIRM...

Believable0 Unbelievable2

Yes it's the sfa who r to blame for all this let's cripple other clubs because your crippled club ran up massive debts that is the mentality of rangers fans like yourself no one is to blame bar rangers son the sfa have to act because if they don't some governing body will Christ you can't sign players for a year you think u would have any money to buy players get back to reality you fool

Agree2 Disagree1

If it had been Celtic not paying other clubs etc., would you suggest this as an act of solidarlty as they'd been treated unfairly? I very much doubt it.

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 07:27:08
There we have it. No signings for one year. A company banned from employing by an Association.
With a government who have said nothing on the matter throughout, UK & Scottish whilst :-
Amazon, a turnover in the order of billions of £'s, with a large presence in Dunfermline, have not paid Corporation Tax.
Edinburgh Trams have unaccountable millions of £'s thrown at it.

Please feel free to add to this thread . . .

Believable1 Unbelievable1

So its ok not to pay tax?
Your right, we should stop Amazon signing players for 12 months too.
You have cheated and need to be punished.....end of.

Joeshmo1888

Agree5 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 07:23:52
does the transfer ban mean d&p can not sell players

Believable0 Unbelievable1

They will have to by the looks of it to make money if not already turned into a farce this is total comic book stuff...
craig+babybear

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 06:06:29
how many ways can ppl tell a club that they just dont want them to stay alive in what is there darkest hour. through no fault of there own glasgow ranger took on what they thought was a man the was going to put money in to them and build them up (whyte) yet little did we know what was going to happen . now we are faced with more and more new problems every day and while rangers fans do alll they can to try and save our club , higher powers make it harder . giving us now a 12 month transfer ban feel like being pushed to being a newco as the ban would now be on the newco . every day we hear how closewe are to getting a new owner the promise to save us for the next to be told how far we are to being saved seems no matter what happens, it just seem to become harder to save our club . i pray that our club will ha some good news soon .

Believable1 Unbelievable1

24 Apr 2012 05:16:51
I suspect the SFA are holding on to further possible penalties should Rangers challenge their punishments and appeal. Remember that appeals can result in heavier penalties.
I was surprised that Rangers were only censured on two counts. Particularly not paying Dun Utd their Scottish cup gate money. I expected Rangers to be excluded from this tournament next year. Perhaps this may still happen if they appeal.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 04:50:16
Looks like Rangers will have to sell must of the senior players to pay of the depts, A time to start over, can see it taking a lot of years to sort it all out. Do you not think the new owners will not just fold the club and start over. Will be easy for who ever takes control of this nightmare for the club. I will keep a big interest on what will happen.

Foxes fan.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

24 Apr 2012 03:13:14
the sfa will revoke rangers licence for the ebt,s
looks certain after today......les

Believable4 Unbelievable2

24 Apr 2012 02:47:17
At least one unknown is now known: SFA penalties.
SPL penalties on 30th April.
This leaves the unknown of the BTC.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

SPL penalties probably as proposed.

The BTC is the biggie.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 01:26:52
When we appeal it Will vet reduced nd ally wont quit so stop the b s

Believable1 Unbelievable7

There may be some give and take in an appeal. I think punishments are often on the harsh side with that in mind.

The Italian scandall a few wears ago saw teams' penalties reduced substantially on appeal.

Agree0 Disagree0

Can you breathe with your head so far in the sand?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 01:20:25
very very dodgy
1]murray says he was dooped?
2]whyte rapes the club
3]whyte allowed by sfa to continue
4]tax office allows whyte to run up 9m of unpaid tax
go on not pay your tax for 9 months go on try it, this is the most unbelievable part of this whole thing

the british goverment needs to look into murray , lloyds
sfa,old board,d and p....this stinks.......les

Believable9 Unbelievable3

Unfortunatly sdm thought he was above the law,but hid it well.Whereas that wee rat cw just f****** flaunts the law of the land and the laws of the game.Its over ,game done but mark my words many others will follow

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:50:56
Look, everybody needs to lighten up, this is getting far too serious, its not the end of Rangers far from it, but the SFA have to set an example otherwise they might as well fold up their tent. The whole world is watching.

OK so its going to set Rangers back a year, the fines are not that big either, write off 1 year to get out of this mess isn't too bad.

Its not the fans fault, all they can be blamed for is wanting success, but they always paid at the gate too.

So its far from over, this is as bad as it going to get, a year from now Ranger will be on the up, so take the pain now for gain later and stop bashing the SFA and the SPL, it could have been a lot worse.

I don't know why were even appealing its not like the club did nothing wrong, if there's no punishment what to stop it all happening again ! with some other chancer, I still feel CW is the fall guy but he was paid to be the fall guy.

Can I just ask is he banned for life from Scotland or just football?

Just football ah shame....

Ger 61

Believable8 Unbelievable2

Spot on ger 61 the SFA have let you off as lightly as they could

Agree10 Disagree2

How have the let us off lightly?

They have hit us with the maximum penalties possible for every rule breach

Agree1 Disagree2

GET A GRIP 61. This will NOT set us back a year........whilst Celtic get stronger it will set us back YEARS!!! There is NO BIDDER with money. We will have no team we are already suffering as time goes on. IF we lose the tax case thats more money to be agreed or paid off in full. There are more penalties still to come.

THIS IS NOT GOOD and certainly not something to ''lighten up about''

GDog
WATP

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:50:12
Interesting that D&P make out Whyte is to blame for EVERYTHING but Whyte makes no criticism of the way D&P are handling the admin. his silence speaks volumes me thinks

Whyte revels in cognitive dissonance (look it up) he uses every trick in the book to deflect blame criticism fault etc back onto those who say the same of him

Today its the SFA who are 'a joke', 'bringing the game into disrepute, 'dragging the good name of rangers thru the mud' etc. See what he's doing everyone?

It's classic 'deflection'. and yet no admittance to his fraud guilt hubris lies deceipt criminal activities etc

Anyone fooled by this is well, a complete and utter fool- I guess like the DR who will just print all his drivel verbatim -just like they did his equally guilty predecessor SDM( who is the REAL guilty party here and STILL getting away with blue bloody murder!)

A plague on all their houses

Mojo

Believable10 Unbelievable0

Whyte appointed D&P. Why them? Yes, they have his interests at heart too. But they can't be too cute as HMRC will be watching them closely.

One conspiracy theory I'm signed up to is that D&P want to drag out the process till 16May in case liquidation means Rangers can't complete the season. That's a good thing, no?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:43:13
motherwell..average gate....3.000
hearts...5,000
dun utd....4000
stjohn....4000...need i go on..
scottish fitba....rip
deecee

Believable4 Unbelievable7

So in other words,rangers keep scottish football clubs afloat by(for talking sake)visiting fir park twice a season?

Agree8 Disagree0

Scotland is a wee country. Population wise, London has more people. It's about time the game here woke up to its small time. It's limitations. It's nothing to be ashamed of

Agree3 Disagree0

2) Its amazing to learn that Rangers keep every other club afloat but dont seem to able to keep themselves afloat

Agree3 Disagree1

24 Apr 2012 00:42:29
Time to get proactive on how Rangets fans can financially hurt the SFA, because, let's face it, the club have next to no chance of surviving in its current form. Straw and camel, nail and coffin... Unbelievably another sad day for the Gers fans. As far as I am concerned two people should be paying for mismanagement - David Murray and Craig Whyte NOT the club, the institution, the players, the staff or the fans.
Thoroughly disgusted and angry Rangers fan

Believable5 Unbelievable4

Drivel

When other clubs players or manager at fined IT'S THE CLUB that pays up. Ie. they represent the club or in this case OWN THE FRICKIN CLUB. So it's absolutely correct that the club get censured. the directors, step,forward one Mr P Murray, signed off the audited books yr on yr. these were RANGERS books not SDM or Whytes books!

Fraid it's large lady singing time bears

Mojo

Agree5 Disagree3

Totally agree with you in every repect,i think if rangers are in spl next season they should not apply for any away tickets for matches,i would like to see rangers go out the spl all together,and i speak for a few rangers fans i know aswell muck up there tv deal and let all clubs budget on a few hundred grand less a year on ticket money,i hate all things to do with scottish football now for the way people line up to kick a club when its down,weve got millions of fans and two people have ruined a great institution sdm n cw have brought us to our knees,well done sdm you are the main man in all this you introduced cw you arranged ebt,you should pay for it not our great club

Agree5 Disagree3

Total clowns above,Rangers cheat lie and dont pay taxes the SFA let you off with a fine and a wee slap on the wrist and you are greeting its everbody else to blame, Get real take it like a man

Agree5 Disagree6

You might think the club belongs to the fans but legally it's (85% anyway) Craig Whyte's, and SDM's before him. If Rangers are punished, it's for defrauding the system.

I'm afraid the players are employees and the fans are customers who pay for what they get. Legally.

Agree1 Disagree0

4) Rangers as a club have broken the rules regardless of who was in charge. Are we trying to say that only Craig Whyte knew that PAYE wasnt getting paid on wages and that other clubsbusinesses hadnt been paid? People within Ibrox should have spoken out. The clubs finances have been a mess even befor CW took over.

We were all conned by the press that he was a billionaire. May I add journalists who were chummy with SDM and printed whatever he told them.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:26:04
Transfer ban....only fair that we
cannot SELL players either then.

SPL trying to kill the club it seems.
OK every rangers fan.. if we do exist
next season we must ban travelling
to other grounds. If we are to suffer
so must all others. Lets even the
playing field.

Maybe Rangers should liquidate and
try and join another league in another
country {Ed001's Note - are you insane? Rangers can't afford to pay the players it has, what good would it do anyone not allowing the club to sell them??}

Believable0 Unbelievable8

Yes, Ed001. Total nonsense. Anyway the players can walk in June, from what I understand.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:20:08
Sfa kill rangers,
Dont think so
Money problems have done it
Keep up non tax payments
Inland revenue avoidance
Lies & cheating
Lowlifes bleeding club dry
Spending invisable money
Greed & dishonesty
Evasion of tax
Rangers face oblivion
Shutdown

Hope all capitails spells it out,
Not sfa dnp any other team,
All shout about lennon blaming everyone else,takes 1 to know 1,
Quote,show me a good looser & il show you a liar,

Believable7 Unbelievable3

24 Apr 2012 00:18:30
time for duff and duffer to f**** off from our club and get better admin team in as these two donkeys dont know wat there doin and keep digging their heels in as they want the gers liquidated no matter wat. the sfa wont get their money from ken dodds lovechild he doesnt even use money to buy a better suit rather than that dingey grey one

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Listen i think its time to lay off duff n phelps you dont know whats going on,i think they are protecting our club because nobody is willing to stump up the correct cash for the club to get us a cva

Agree1 Disagree1

So...what is the correct cash for the club then?
We arnt worth a penny,,oh and where do we play next season, does Whyte rent us Ibrox

Agree0 Disagree0

D&P are doing their job. It's not for your benefit, it's for the creditors. It's only come to that because the last two owners failed to do things right.

Re Ibrox - the club may not own it next season but any new owner will really only want it to rent to Rangers. That's really it's only worth (I can't see Partick or St Mirren wanting to play there or even affording to).

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:17:59
lafferty is supposedly suspended for 2 weeks and banned from attending games, anyone else heard this?

Believable8 Unbelievable0

Heard that ally wanted him to play while injured. also heard that a.lly cancelled his
hernia op

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:16:50
talkin aboot cuttin off yir nose tae spite yir face.....a fine i can see but a transfer embargo is just plain stupid.....not only do we not walk away...we dont forget either....scottish fitba as we know it just died a slow painfull death....cmon tbk...show us the road....feckemall..deecee {Ed001's Note - I fail to see the issue, you can't sign players while in admin anyway.}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

If we get out of admin we will still have 2 transfer windows without signings...deecee

Agree1 Disagree0

You should have 3 seasons making your way up the leagues,so as I have said previously the SFA let you off as lightly as they could

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:12:31
Should Gers vote for the 10-2 voting process at the end of the month ? I think yes. We are getting f****d by the SFA anyway.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

What were you expecting to get away with it take your punishment its the least you deserve

Agree2 Disagree2

So should Lennon then.

Agree0 Disagree1

Whats this got to do with lennon davie c

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Apr 2012 00:09:38
That's what the blue nights et al were looking for, a wee slap on the wrists and know where they at now. Makes no difference in the grand scheme of things!

CWD

Believable3 Unbelievable2

23 Apr 2012 23:59:15
Is there anymore D&P can do to drag this out ? . You would think they were doing it on purpose, but what possible gain could they acquire if the club went into liquidation. It all seems an inescapable mess at the moment, But I believe we will rise again like the phoenix, although a slow and bumpy process and against ALL the odds like the SFA sanctions and fines will be an even stronger club for many years to come.
One day we will watch the demise of those clubs who laughed and scorned and voted to kick us while we were down, and on that day we will show real dignity and offer sympathy and help..
SIMPLY THE BEST..

Believable1 Unbelievable4

Is that the same dignity and help minty murray showed to airdrie when they were on their knees?

Agree3 Disagree1

Try doing your homework Declan. Minty Murray as you call him was not a Rangers fan. He owned the club, Yes. But was never a Rangers Supporter.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Apr 2012 23:57:56
I am afraid this punishment will signal the end , the transfer embargo and the fine makes everything so much worse. It is clear that SFA and SPL are going to hammer us.
They really are going to put the boot in when we are down.
I would suggest that they are taking a big risk in biting the hand that feeds them. Read today one SPL club makes £1m from Rangers involvement.
I really believe that now is the time to go to division 3 and let them all see what life will be without us. Let them lose the sky deal, let them lose the sponsorship of SPL, as surely they will get nothing if Rangers are not there. Let them lose the income from Rangers fans paying the over inflated ticket prices that they charge, let them see what happens when the co-efficient collapses.
Let's sell all the first team players that are on big bucks, let's play the kids, let's go to east Stirling and let them have their payday. Let's build gradually and be ready financially when we hit the SPL again. Ninety per cent will be bust by the time we are back, then they will see that having a kick didn't do them any good.
And to those that are Celtic fans and will come out with you deserve it and we will flourish are living in cloud cuckoo land you will need to reduce your squad, you will be signing £500k players instead of £2m players, so what you are watching will be less enjoyable. Listen when we were winning 9 in a row and winning by miles, winning 4-0 every week is only great for a while. It gets pretty boring winning before you even start the game.
I know our previous owners deserve all they get, they have acted despicably, but let me tell you the minute we are no longer there is the death knell for Scottish football.

Believable6 Unbelievable5

How can one club make 1m off rangers? numbers dont add up............green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree2

And how would you know what Celtic's financials are?.........green jhedi

Agree3 Disagree1

You're having a laugh...chill...everyone is having a freak...it's work in progress for a lack of serious punishment...even the tic back this so we remain in WHATEVER form or it will all FOLD!

Agree2 Disagree2

If we go to the 3rd...there will be nothing to come back to...you are not thinking straight it doesn't make sense...why damage what is rightfully ours?

Agree0 Disagree2

Case in point...dundee utd vs st johnstone, cl play off place...5000+, turn it up...everyone has been gtf for years lol...we NEED change...lets use this opportunity as a massive club to do something!! ace

Agree1 Disagree0

@4 rightfully our,s ?

Agree0 Disagree0

23 Apr 2012 23:57:10
reality check, Lloyds bank had embargo in place for two years, it's a case balancing within means and managing expectations.

youth and prudent investment is the future.

Believable3 Unbelievable4

Brain check for you!

Agree4 Disagree0

 
Change Consent