Rangers Banter Archive October 27 2013

27 Oct 2013 17:22:51
Am I the only rangers fan thinking this, what the hell is happening with the best natural winger at our club david templeton, why does mccoist not start this guy, is there something wrong here, ie an injury, a falling out etc, with wee temps in the team it gives us a far better balance and he creates chances for our strikers in abundance, I just can't understand it at all, if wee temps isn't injured he should be starting for us every week in my opinion, I wish mccoist would reveal why he's not starting him, let us know ally

Templeton would be in the starting eleven every week as he provides good delivery to our strikers as he did for the winning goal at Brechin.

My personal choices McColl because of the style of football he instills in his team plus a proven motivator, or possibly Derek McInnes again young quality manager, both rangers material. the sooner we get any excuse to dump ally the better, his recent statements as usual about needing millions AGAIN this guy would given the chance bankrupt us signing multi million pound deals if he was allowed to. to save his and his mates jobs, his words. total lack of respect for fans out of pockets thousands trying to keep rangers afloat to survive the crooks of the last 2 years. fed up with his lack of compassion and it is really frustrating knowing he has no clue as a manager but with the vastly differing standard in our team player for player and wage wise he looks good purely on that basis. as a manager he is no use at all. hoping new board and king in particular see that he is a burden and financially a joke on current and previous/future wage. george

29 Oct 2013 02:05:21
mite be summat to do with the fact that Templeton is so injury prone and isn't a team player, got good skill but a stunner evry 5 wks ain't enuf, he, s very lightweight and will be out for long periods, but should I agree be used now before the winter comes
tommyblue

27 Oct 2013 10:14:12
Another statement from Regan indicating the Sfa could block Dave King becoming involved at Ibrox
Why is he continuing to mouth off when there is a committee in place to look at individuals who are looking to become involved in a Scottish football club. There has been no approach to the Sfa regarding a individual becoming involved at Ibrox according to their own statement and as such there should be no statements made until a approach is made and the committee has met and made a decision on the matter or has Regan become the decision maker at the SfA using the Daily Record as his mouthpiece. The committee should remove him now or is he giving out what has already been decided. The case would be decided on" fit and proper person" Sfa rules, I suggest Regan is neither of these.

John, I have no time for Regan, but your point should be directed to certain factions in the media as they adapt certain replies to suit their articles.
They continue to refer to possible situations that could prevail if Dave King does not meet the ''fit and proper person status''.
If things are kept simple:-
DK was not subject to any criminal charges and his previous involvement with Rangers seems straight forward.
billyb

Odd pictures from KING in all the papers, showing his squint. Why all pick these ones. and not him looking straight?

Is there a intenion to make the link between whyte and his googleyes and king. are they half-brothers?

Im not his biggest fan but to be fair to regan I heard his interview and he was continually asked the question and he stated he could not comment as he's not been approached by rangers on the matter it is the media and newspapers twistig it to get a story

@1 unfortunately Dave King plead guilty to forty odd charges and was ordered to pay a huge fine or face 80 years in prison. Unfortunately this makes him unlikely to pass the fit and proper person test as he is a convicted criminal

To 1. ] There were no criminal charges as a compromise was reached with the tax authorities.
billyb

{Ed039's Note - He pleaded guilty to 41 tax offences but the tax fraud case was dropped, dont get confused between the 2)