Rangers Banter Archive June 28 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


28 Jun 2012 22:16:23
Just watched bomber brown on you tube there , he states he has been gathering info etc for the past two months Well I've got a question for him why wait till greEn takes over why not bid same as blue knights , Walters etc He Says whYte is involved with green ! Show us the title deeds mr green

Believable5 Unbelievable4

The guy is a clown. Shouting and swearing like an old drunk in the middle of the street, when kids are present and tripping himself up at every turn. If newco fans are happy with this type of person heading a takeover then you are more deluded and foolish than I thought.

Briggs

Agree16 Disagree1

Like my old uncle at a wedding nice o see him but full of pish

din22

Agree9 Disagree1

John browns a mug. way out of his depht. hes going to cost rangers very much, that his stupid plan will knock the club back that much it will not recover ever . hes just anotrher mug looking for hero status. watch mr green selling to major supermarket if brown doesnt back down

Agree11 Disagree1

Took him months to write the speech he delivered on weds night, surely laudrup addressing the fans would've been better than that t**t brown,

Ska bhoy

Agree9 Disagree1

Brown probably couldnt even sign his name on the contract. Get the crayons out

Agree4 Disagree0

What a bunch of tubes you are. Brown is the man, a decent, honest, working class hero. So what if he's not the most eloquent of speakers, he had the nads to stand up and talk from the heart.

Agree0 Disagree1

The mans a half wit so grow up and stop getting taken in with im your hero diddy men coming out for five mins of fame

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 22:07:12
How about we go to div 3, see how the SPL's chairmen, their clubs and their fans get on with their "sporting integrity" and we sign up the Hammer, Laudrup and Ammo etc for a season in the 3rd tier? Watch the crowds flock in and the TV companies scramble to show it...

BB

Believable3 Unbelievable6

Isn't that how we got in this mess? Drummiebear

Agree3 Disagree1

How about they pay back ebt and you would ever have been liquidated

din22

Agree5 Disagree4

Ebts didnt liquidate us fool, unpaid vat and ni and ticketus liquidated us. Still no ruling on the ebts yet pal so away n boil yer head

Agree2 Disagree2

28 Jun 2012 21:47:12
Don't trust Green at all, is only here to make a fast buck. We need an owner for the long haul who cares about the club and will give us stability

Believable3 Unbelievable9

28 Jun 2012 21:36:34
For what it's worth...

The SPL clubs want us in the 1st division. Only one year without our income (if we get promoted 1st go) SKY willing to wait. I would rather we took our chances in the 3rd and they can see how they manage with their "sporting integrity" for 3 years. Also a wee cheerie thought, how do you reckon messers "Hammer" Albertz, Laudrup, Amaruso etc would fancy a season in the Scottish 3rd division? SKY would LOVE it... bring it on!

(the real) BB

Believable3 Unbelievable6

Spl clubs do not want you in spl period have yet to see vote if they want you in sfl
so many of sfl already so no to 1st div and old rangers have not even applied yet

din22

Agree3 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 20:53:25
The Scottish Premier League have warned they will form a breakaway second tier if plans to put Rangers in the First Division are not approved by clubs.

STV understands a number of sides in the Scottish Football League have been told they face being cut adrift from the top tier if they do not agree to proposals for league reconstruction.

Plans emerged on Thursday which would see the merger of both the SPL and SFL, the introduction of play-offs and a change to financial distribution between clubs in the top two tiers.

Central to the suggestions is the SPL finding means to relegate Rangers from their league, meaning they would play First Division football next season as a new company.

If they do not gain the approval of clubs, it is understood the long-mooted SPL2 could be created, with SFL First Division sides invited to join.

Oh well blackmail Is being employed now. Do you really want to play in a league that's seen to be your backers as well? Quite shocking.

Believable6 Unbelievable1

This is outrageous and yet a Catch 22 situation

if we go down to div 3 we must surely sell ibrox which is the crown jewels

Agree1 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 19:50:15
I just wish this was all over,
It is obvious that no matter what
punishments are handed out to our
club the rest of scottish football will
never be happy that it is severe
enough. The true culprits for the
mess we are in are still unpunished
but our club is being mercilessly
slaughtered. Best thing would be if
we could get out of this perfect
footballing nation who
are all so perfect and all 100% full of footballing integrity and start up in another
country so that all the faultless
footballing fraternity can get on
with there perfect lives.

Believable8 Unbelievable0

Rangers and Rangers fans are the culprits, stop blaming others. You deserve punishment. {Ed039's Note - It was the rangers fans? The people who paid their hard earned? What a tube you are)

Agree0 Disagree2

The non-Rangers SPL holier than thou fans will always forever blame us for anything that happens now in scottish football. ie. "That wouldn't have happened if you lot hadn't....etc blah blah blah" "You're the cause of this because...etc blah blah blah" Even if we go to Div3, they will never let this go.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 21:28:54
All im hearing on here is Ally not coming to 1st day of training, this was not training just a fitness assessment and as for Ally being on holiday i feel it's well deserved after the past few months.

As for the players not transferring to newco cos they didn't want to play in 3rd division this is absolute nonsense, they all knew they would have been allowed to leave for knockdown prices if that happened they have simply chosen this route for a nice signing on fee and a bump in wages for saving the new club a transfer fee of this i have no doubt.

TrueGer

Believable8 Unbelievable4

I still think others will leave, 4 of them are out of contract and can go anywhere if they don't like Rangers terms.
Others as you say Might go but let us get the small fees they negotiated. The transfer window hasn't openned yet.

Agree5 Disagree1

But what about the wage deferral cash? That was due from the liquidated rangers so they would have lost all that. A big signing on fee would make it up.

Agree3 Disagree1

Are the people who are saying that the players should have moved across to be sold to bring money in for Green the same people who are saying don't buy season tickets, thus giving money to Green?
Al

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 20:36:24
well done to perry he says he owe's the club not like the money grabbers

Believable13 Unbelievable3

Yes well done make big lee captain and fill the team with youngsters

Agree0 Disagree3

28 Jun 2012 20:34:23
wee message to naismith & co the badge on the front is bigger than the name on the back. mr myle

Believable10 Unbelievable7

But the badge on the front will soon be obsolete.These guys have got families to think of,can you really blame them?

Agree5 Disagree4

Very true....but which badge will be on the front of the jersey?

Agree3 Disagree0

Dont hit me with families to support these guys made 20 000 a week while your average guy is on 20-30 000 a year so this argument doesn't wash and short career 10yrs plus at 10-20 000 grand a week so say no more RANGERS TILL I DIE

Agree3 Disagree2

Blame them only thing all of us are p*ssed at is the fact they had clauses in there contracts letting them go at knocked down prices , they choose to leave rather than give Green the transfer cash buy hey it's karma just look at the amount of clubs owed money from rangers for jelavic &co what goes around comes around

Agree2 Disagree2

@1 agree different club rangers do not exist

Agree2 Disagree1

Why should anyone concern themselves with throwing their money away to Rangers?
There's a wrongful concept kn here that Sevco are somehow due money. Absolute rubbish, why should players be financial mugs and share their money with a club that conned them out of their salaries. Also the morality of rangers stiffing creditors for £140m justifies not handing over cash to this rogue club.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 20:22:37
Can someone tell me please why there so against Charles Green? I will be renewing my season ticket because i am a rangers fan and i support my club. Green and Malcom Murray have both said or ticket money remains with the club... so why not?

Believable8 Unbelievable9

I am sure I heard this 1 year ago from a certain mr whyte, green and co needs to earn the fans trust etc

Agree2 Disagree1

Well said mate, people on here don't even know why they hate him FFS. I know we had the worst guy ever in whyte but we need to give green a chance, he is trying o sort a total disaster zone of a team. If we don't buy tickets we wont have a club its that simple. Where da fuk was bomber, smith McColl etc when we were in admin? Too little too late

J

Agree2 Disagree1

You're not renewing your season ticket you're getting a new one. and games may not be at Ibrox

Agree2 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 20:11:12
Truth out at last, if we don't get in the 1st div ,spl will stuff those that go against us. If we end up in SFL 3, 5 clubs go bust. Sporting integrity, aye right

Believable10 Unbelievable4

At least we know that those 5 clubs that go bust will have the full weight of the SPL behind them fighting to restructure the league system to ensure that they are only out of the SPL for a single year. Right?
Al

Agree5 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 20:11:12
whith jardines latest comments and so many people having opinions on what is left of rangers history, why doesnt anyone from rangers or the sfa make an offical statement letting everyone know for sure if the history continues or not.

far too many people with differnet ideas of the situation now.... it cant be that hard for the people in the know to make it official surely??

Believable6 Unbelievable0

It;s broken.Walter,Goram,Gough,Green is that enough?

Agree3 Disagree2

The history remains on the condition the newco gets old rangers share in the SPL. Should remain as they are planning on giving us th share and relegating us to 1st

Agree0 Disagree4

28 Jun 2012 20:06:32
Fellow Bears

Everyone should read Malcolm Murray's statement issued this evening.

It reads very well. He is as frank and as open in response to all the rumours, scare mongering and all other nonsense which is threatening to send us into a state of civil war.

It is now time to show a degree of trust and get FULLY BEHIND Green and the newco.

They are the only show in town and yes I am still apprehensive but when I look around I don't see anyone else queuing up to turn us around.

There's going to be a lt more ups and downs before we are ever ear where we once were but we have more chance of success by standing TOGETHER....

Go read Murray's statement....and understand he's saying enough is enough! The mistrust and paranoia needs to end otherwise we can never move forward.

SPM

Believable6 Unbelievable7

The definition of a con man...someone who will tell you what you want to hear. In saying that if Brown or any other Rangers man has any information he should share with fans, then he should share it NOW or just shut up.

Agree2 Disagree3

You are damned for supporting green and damned if you dont

the same was true of Whyte

us fans have been pushed around and treated like purely a revenue source

well I am sick of it

to be honest we the fans should walk away from this whole sorry situation and start up our own AFC Wimbledon style Rangers.

And play in whatever junior league will have us. with enough support we will get back in the league soon enough and yes it will be a new Rangers but it will also grow one day to be a giant. And if sevco or whatever it calls itself survives, we will meet it on the way up and give it a good hiding.

Just Imagine!

Eff the SFA and Eff the SPL and Eff anyone who tries to stop us

Steve G. Bear

Agree2 Disagree0

I liked Murray's comments as well. comes across as articulate, sensible and passionate. Think he'll be a good chairman.

Agree0 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 19:43:50
MALCOLM MURRAY, Chairman of The Rangers Football Club, issued the following statement today.

"On behalf of the Board of Directors I would like to clarify a number of issues that have added to the Club's difficulties this week.

"Events have triggered a frenzy of emotion around the Club to the point where the only people who stepped up to buy the Club and begin the long and arduous task of restoring and rebuilding Rangers are now being vilified by people who claim to have the interests of the Club at heart.

"This is deeply depressing and such factionalism can only undermine efforts to make Rangers once again the great sporting institution is has been for generations.

"As the new Board of Directors, we fully understand the anxiety of supporters given what has happened in the past and I wish to address all the key issues and present the facts of the matter.

League status

"The Executive Team are working tirelessly to resolve the issues with the SFA, SPL and SFL. We will update supporters as soon as possible and we understand a poll of supporters' opinions is about to be launched.


Financial position

"The Club is funded by the new owners and working capital is in place for the foreseeable future.Staff and players were paid this month as normal and will continue to be while the Club operates and functions normally.

"We are raising additional funds as we said that we would and the board are working to find a way to allow supporters the opportunity to invest.More details will be available in the near future."

"There is no doubt, however, that any boycott of season ticket sales can only harm the Club and the manager Ally McCoist and ultimately the supporters. Such action would only serve to help destroy the very institution that is so dear to us.

Investment

"As has been stated previously, a consortium of investment funds and individuals invested in the acquisition and funding of Rangers.

"The consortium includes, Zeus Capital, Chris Morgan, a UK-based businessman representing family trusts; Glenmuir, the renowned Scottish clothing company, Alessandro Celano of Blue Pitch Holdings, Jude Allen, Mazen Houssami, Elias Kaisar and Mr Jean Haddad.

"The provenance of all investments made in Rangers is being made now to the SFA and all directors of Rangers will be required to pass the SFA's fit and proper persons test. I also accepted the chairmanship of the Club on the basis that the highest standards of corporate governance would be implemented by the Board. The Board has also provided information to the Rangers Fans Fighting Fund.

"At the outset the investors agreed that Rangers would be a long-term strategic investment and there is no intention of selling the Club.

"That said, the Board is committed to broadening the investment base and from the outset made clear that no individual investor should own more than 10-15%. In the coming weeks we will be announcing details of how fans can invest in the Club and fan ownership is one of the cornerstones of our philosophy.

"Anyone with Rangers best interests at heart is welcome to invest or come and talk to us. Last year I attended the 50th anniversary of the London Rangers Supporters Club where John Brown was an excellent guest speaker. He has my number and, if he has investors, we welcome them and do not see why they have to be separate to our current long-term investors. All fans and potential investors should pull together in difficult times.

"It also remains our firm intention to re-list Rangers as a publicly quoted company on an appropriate stock exchange at the earliest opportunity.

Season tickets

"The Club has new banking facilities in place and, as stated a number of times previously, all season ticket money will only be used for the benefit of the Club and its operations. Further information for season ticket holders was published on the website last week which included details on payments.

"Rangers has a loyal and extensive season ticket holder base and we would urge all fans to renew their books. In this aspect, the ownership of the Club is irrelevant. Season ticket sales are the largest single source of income for the Club and only the Club and the team will suffer if it is withheld. The money does not go to Charles Green, Malcolm Murray or any investor - it goes to Rangers.


Asset ownership

"All the assets commonly associated with the football club - Ibrox, Murray Park, the Albion car park, staff, players etc - are the property of The Rangers Football Club, which at present is registered as Sevco Scotland Ltd until a name change is given formal approval.

"Sevco Scotland was formed to ensure that if the formation of a new company was required in the event of a CVA being rejected, then the Club's corporate entity would be a Scottish registered company as it has always been.

"For the avoidance of doubt, Craig Whyte has NO involvement with the Club, in Sevco, The Rangers Football Club or any other of the consortium members. Indeed, measures have been implemented to ensure that Mr Whyte could not return to the Club in any way which is in compliance with the SFA's ruling on his participation in Scottish football.


Players

"It was extremely disappointing that a number of players have chosen to leave the Club.

"It was disrespectful to everyone at Rangers and to the fans not to be honest about the financial gain they will receive in return for walking away from the Club that has supported them over many years.

"Let's be clear, the clauses they and their agents negotiated in return for the temporary wage cut during administration, would have enabled them to easily move on from Rangers with our blessing. Their actions have deprived the Club of significant transfer fee income.

"The rest of the staff at Ibrox and Murray Park have got on with the job asked of them and it is extremely encouraging to see other players who were due back at Murray Park today, arrive as planned.

"As a lifelong fan, I would personally like to thank those players and staff for their loyalty and commitment to the Club and I look forward to meeting the squad when they are all back from their holidays.

Summary

"The consortium that has purchased Rangers wishes to see the Club restored and rebuilt. We want to see Rangers be great again.

"The consortium is not the villain of the piece, nor is Charles Green. They are the only people who stepped up to buy the Club.

"What happened under Craig Whyte was horrendous and should never be repeated and I will do everything in my power as Chairman to ensure it doesn't happen again.

"I have been a Rangers fan all my life and a season ticket holder for many years and accepted the position of Chairman with the sole aim of helping steer this great club back to a solid financial footing and future success on the pitch.

"The vicious and gratuitous blood lust of recent times must end not only for Rangers sake but for Scottish football too. Certain individuals must ask some searching questions of themselves as to what their true motives have been over the last few months and as to whether they really have the best interests at heart of the Club they claim to love and support."

Believable6 Unbelievable6

Now thats the kind of talk you want in a Chairman. Brown v Murray,you decide.

Agree3 Disagree0

Glenmuir knitwear is it?..Ah well, no more of that junk for me, it's Pringle all the way from now on! :)

Agree1 Disagree1

Okay so Mr Murray has at least attempted to address some of the concerns that the supporters have.

However his statement regarding the financial position - "working capital is in place for the foreseeable future". .."staff and players were paid as normal and will continue to be "while the club operates and functions normally"
Don't know what anyone else thinks, but this is hardly a resounding fanfare as an indication that substantial funds have been invested by the consortium members.
He goes on to say that they are still in the process of raising funds,and urge fans to purchase season tickets.
Is this what he means by "while the club operates and functions normally"?
In affect what he is saying is.. our funds are limited,and if fans don't invest it will harm the club. Okay so logic dictates that ST money should have to be taken into account,but i feel a more compelling gesture would have been to ask fans to purchase season tickets as normal with all monies remaining in a seperate account. This money is to be used solely for player acquisitions and wages.
Some indication of investment from the consortium members would have been helpful also,like say £20 million will be put up front by the directors/investors which will sustain us for "X" amount of time without the need for fans money.
Admittedly on reflection this notion seems crazy,but this is the whole crux of why the mistrust has been aimed at CG.
We want assurances that our money is not paying for the takeover.
I also note that he made no reference to CW's floating charge.
I also have concerns over the assets quote. At first sight it seems to suggest that "The Rangers football club" "presently registered as sevco owns the assets". So this would appear to indicate that TRFC owns the assets. However this is not as straightforward as it seems.
The name change "TRFC" has not been formally approved as yet,so therefore the assets are the property of sevco.
What happens if the name applied for is refused on the grounds of similarity?
He later states that "The money does not go to Charles Green,Malcolm Murray
or any investor -it goes to Rangers"
This is simply untrue.The money goes into sevco's account.
Stil not convinced.
P.O.B.

Agree1 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 19:22:37
What about andy little any sign of him coming back ...kenny bluenose

Believable3 Unbelievable3

28 Jun 2012 18:42:17
Our entry to the SFL requires us to accept all punishments set against the old RFC without legal challenge. Does this include the signing ban, as although outlined as unlawful by the courts this has not been recinded by the SFA. If this remains there must be grave dangers of the Newco being relegated from what ever division they are allowed to enter (except division 3 at the moment). Looking at training today, we barely had enough players to make up a team, and could not fill a full bench even without injuries !

Believable5 Unbelievable1

Not any more, cat out of the bag tonight. 5 spl clubs in trouble if we go to 3. Meltdown as we predicted, sporting integrity you say,lol.

Agree1 Disagree2

I'd go div 3, sign up the Hammer, Laudrup, Ammo etc and watch the crowds and TV scramble to get in...

(the real) BB

Agree2 Disagree2

Wish people would stop talkin sh1te about signing Albertz, Amoruso and Laudrup! Wasn't that long ago Brian Laudrup was battling cancer! Ya seriously think he wants to spend his Saturday's runnin round gettin lumps kicked out of him in the 3rd division. Wise up!

Agree1 Disagree1

@2: TV scrambling to watch the ancients playing in division 3? Against division 3 standard players? How long do you think the old guys will last?

Agree2 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 18:31:47
Further to the 'leak' re the newco moving into the 1st division, I found this on the STV website.

'The Scottish Premier League have warned they will form a breakaway second tier if plans to put Rangers in the First Division are not approved by clubs.
STV understands a number of sides in the Scottish Football League have been told they face being cut adrift from the top tier if they do not agree to proposals for league reconstruction.
Plans emerged on Thursday which would see the merger of both the SPL and SFL, the introduction of play-offs and a change to financial distribution between clubs in the top two tiers.
Central to the suggestions is the SPL finding means to relegate Rangers from their league, meaning they would play First Division football next season as a new company.
If they do not gain the approval of clubs, it is understood the long-mooted SPL2 could be created, with SFL First Division sides invited to join.'

Desperate or what?
Am still for going to the 3rd division and earning our way back, with no limit of time.
By the time we get back up CFC will have crawled into the English League setup anyway - they consider Scottish football is not big enough for a club the size of CFC.

Believable3 Unbelievable4

Not long ago rangers considered that Scottish football was not big enough for them. How times have changed, you are now begging to get into any league that will have you.

Agree9 Disagree3

@1 True but your lot continue to think Scottish football is not big enough.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 18:24:37
green was right, playrs only had 24 hours aftr sale to reject transfer to newco under tupe regulations....jsm

Believable2 Unbelievable6

Unfortunately both you and Mr Green are 100% wrong.
I am an employment law consultant and I can assure you that transfer of employment through TUPE cannot happen without a period of consultation. An employer cannot just transfer an employee without their consent. Only when there has been a period of consultation and the employee has agreed to transfer is the process complete.
The TUPE regulations are there to protect employees not employers

Agree4 Disagree1

And in order for a TUPE to be lawful Green had to fully consult with all affected employees - including establishing a representative body, the members of whom to be voted on by the all affected personnel, or their trade union representatives. The consultation should have included all plans for the Newco. Interesting that Green quotes TUPE when it suits him when having singulary failed to follow the TUPE requirements himself

Agree3 Disagree2

The main point being that the T&C's have to be equal to or better than the existing contract.
The contracts have changed dramatically. Not only have the demographics of playing in the SPL changed,there's no European football for three years,salaries and bonus payments are also affected,and the chance of winning trophies.
Therefore there is no way the current T&C's could have been maintained.
As an employment law consultant you should be aware of this.
I doubt T.U.P.E. was even considered in this case. You are correct in relation to the consultation period point you make. However this just strengthens my belief that TUPE was not even addressed. I think CG is basing his case on the wage deferral contracts the players negotiated.
P.O.B.

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 18:02:02
are rangers entitled to development fees for ness, fleck?

Believable4 Unbelievable4

Rangers are shortly to be liquidated, how would they get a development fee.

Mac2.

Agree4 Disagree3

Maybe thats the op's point, old rangers should be getting development fees therefore adding more to the pot for creditors during liquidation. The outstanding amount everton are due to pay for jelavic is still going to the creditors so why not mccabe,fleck and ness? They maybe free agents in their eyes but i dont remember aberdeen still paying alukos wages when they demanded a fee for him.

Agree0 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 17:23:29
have to say that i am most disappointed in ness and mccabe,2 decent young players who rangers have brought through the system and this is all the thanks they get? both would have benefited with a full year of first team football even if it is in the 1st div,ness won't last 2 mins in the english prem before he's out long term injured as usual,i find it difficult to wish any of them well after jumping ship just when rangers need them most,as for naismith....this is a guy who's been happy to collect his wages after being out injured long term twice and now cant wait to get out,all i ask is where's the loyalty to rangers,the club which so many of them claim to love?,surely they could have at least stayed for 1 year to help get rangers on their feet again or am i just being naive?
also,why has it taken so long for all these so called money men and ex rangers players to come forward?,looks to me like too little and too late

ian

Believable9 Unbelievable1

28 Jun 2012 16:46:27
Green was the first one to make a commitment to Rangers and I strongly feel that in order to get the club back on their feet every Rangers fan should get behind him. I can't see him screwing the club over after what has happened with Murray and Whyte; he needs to play his cards right especially with the amount of media attention this saga is getting.

Fair play to Brown, he loves the club and I'm sure he wants what's best for them but he's too late.

Further more I hope every club in Division 1 knocks back Rangers application; by law they are in a position to do so. I want this for a number of reasons:-

1. If rangers get into Division 1 all we will hear is that they had it easy; preferential treatment. Not that I care what people say about my club but I want them to prove themselves again.
2. Several years without SPL clubs getting gate money etc. will show these clubs that keeping Rangers in the SPL would have been for the benefit of the league and not just our club. And there are no guarantees that Rangers will get promoted every year.
3.I don't see it as fair anyway; like what happened to some italian clubs they had to go all the way down.
4. I think youth development will flourish as Rangers will now be in a position where they will need to rely on the talent which is coming through the ranks.

WATP

Believable11 Unbelievable6

Just read statment from Malcolm Murray denies any link to C. Shyster have a read official Rangers website.Do not think for one minute this guy would come out with a statment if not true.Have a read fellow bears.Also names investors up to now.

Agree2 Disagree2

28 Jun 2012 16:00:45
SANDY JARDINE has reiterated that there is no break Rangers' long and illustrious history.

Fans have been angered by jibes from some quarters and completely ill-informed reporting that there is a 'new' Rangers and the 'old' one has ceased to exist.

Jardine said: "It's a lot of nonsense that our history does not carry on. There are a lot of other fans out there saying that we are a new club but that's not the case.

"We never worried about what other supporters said in the past and we shouldn't worry about what other supporters say now.

"What matters is what Rangers supporters think.

"We are a club with 140 years of history and next year we will be a club with 141 years of history.

"If and when we win another Championship flag we will add it to the 54 we already have."

Speaking on RangersTV, Jardine said: "Whatever league we will be playing in we will still be playing in the same stadium, we will still be playing in a blue shirt.

"We will have the same supporters and the same staff. Nothing has changed and people have to realise that.

"We have a Hall of Fame board recognising our greatest players and I have no doubt that in the future other players will be added to it and they will be delighted to be among greats like Davie Meiklejohn, George Young and John Greig.

"This fallacy that our history has ended is just banter from other supporters and some of our fans have taken the bait. They should just ignore it.

"We have a rich history - Barcelona, Nine in a Row, 54 league titles - are we going to forget that? I don't think so."

Believable16 Unbelievable22

Same staff Were players not considered as staff?

Agree1 Disagree0

For God's Sake!

Enough!

What has to happen for certain people including Jardine that RFC ceased to exist when it was placed in liquidation.
There will NEVER be a 54th title...it shall be a 1st.

History can never be taken away...but you cannot add to someone/something else's history when it has ended!

Between Jardine and Brown - supported by Dingwall and his neanderthals - there is an alarming amount of communication and misguided comments which are being drip fed and fuelling those supporters who are either unwilling ...or too ignorant ...to realise that Rangers as we all know is FINISHED....

This is a new dawn ....so accept it and stop living in the past and blaming others for the mistakes made by those who were entrusted with being custodians of the club!

And before I get slaughtered by some on here, I am a Rangers fan and long-standing season ticket holder of over 20 years....

I wish someone at newco Rangers would gag Jardine as all he does is stupidly fue fires with his ignorant, ill-informed, misjudged statements. Hasn't the penny dropped that the arrogance displayed in his comments antagonise non-supporters, clubs and regulators....it is tiring...it is boring...it is just pathetic!

SPM

Agree6 Disagree6

I've been saying this all along too. Let the bureaucrats have it one way and the fans have it their own way. Whatever corporate stuff goes on the fans can always say "our team won 9 in a row etc etc etc.

Agree2 Disagree2

Yes sandy rangers have a rich history and im quite sure in time the newco will build its own history but they will never be the same club rangers are dead and gone get used to it. Tulip

Agree3 Disagree3

A bit of respect and concern for the creditors would have been nice but no, let's pretend the debts never happened and keep the history!

Agree5 Disagree2

Please not the history thing yet again.The history stops but it doesn't go away.New future ahead and NEW history.Why are we still talking about this?

Agree4 Disagree1

Rangers won 54 league titles ...THEY DONT EXIST, rangers won the european cup winners cup...THEY DONT EXIST, rangers were liquidated .. THEY DONT EXIST FFS how difficult is this. Sandy pandy is living in cloud cuckoo land so get a grip...RANGERS DONT EXIST THEY DIED.

Agree6 Disagree2

I as a Celtic fan of 40 years plus had a lot of respect for Sandy Jardine as a player , after Danny McGrain I'd say he was the best Scottish right back , but over the past couple of months he has gone down in my estimations , despite his protestations Rangers FC ceased to exist last week , and with its demise , it's history is frozen , a new club is being set up , which as yet is not registered with the SFA , SPL or SFL , if this was not the case then why would a transfer of SPL share , a league registration certificate and membership application be required ? The old Rangers FC is gone and a Newco being set up including a new club which can't be called Rangers FC , so come on now Sandy grow up , you are more inteligent than you are making yourself look with these ridiculous rantings .

Agree2 Disagree2

If I go on to EBAY tonight and buy a Victoria Cross won at the battle of Rorke's Drift, then I will have bought the medal, I will own the medal, but I as sure as hell didn't win the medal.

You cant buy history.

Good Luck, Good Bears

Gerry

Agree3 Disagree3

Rangers football club were incorporated in 1899 and became a public limited company. Both the football club and the incorporated company we're one and the same inseparable entity. That singular entity is being liquidated 2012.
A new Rangers football club is being formed as a corporate entity and has bought some of the assets of the old liquidated club.
It cannot use the same badges, logos, crests, mottos and as a new club with zero footballing history shares zero history with the previous club and cannot claim any history.
I don't believe Jardine said the OP report. If he did he's s very foolish individual and not competent to be in a formal position within Association football.

Agree4 Disagree2

28 Jun 2012 15:48:16
just a thought folks spl is a no go for obvious reasons now it seems that sfl division 1 clubs have started to bitch saying its unfair that our club is entered into there league ...in my eyes division 2 and three are no go due to the fact that no clubs grounds can safely accomodate the travelling support of our club .therfore the ruling body must act in the interest of public safety and insist on our club being entered into sfl division 1 im sure that strathclyde police would also reccomend such a scenario ...we as fans can help charles greens cause by purchasing the season tickets he can use the proof of tickets purchased to help push through entry into sfl division 1 ....i dont go for any other ownership option such as bomber browns as time is against us just now if another consortium wish to buy him out leave it a season or so just to let things calm down ...so i call on my fellow bears to invest in the club its now or never folks do the right thing ....we should make the media aware of the fans wishes to continue supporting the club we love at both home and away ,,lets make it happen

Believable3 Unbelievable11

What utter garbage, every ground in Scotland has a capacity. I appreciate basic arithmetic hasn't been a strongpoint at Ibrox lately but if you get say 900 tickets for East Stirling guess how many get in? I would imagine over 50,000 Celtic fans wanted a ticket for the game at Ibrox that could have won the league, no safety issues that day. It's called ticket allocation, try and grasp its concept!

Agree3 Disagree0

You will get ticket only allocations for div3.
Nice try! But hopelessly stupid.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 16:11:03
OMG how embarrassing was John Brown on STV news last night. Is that who we want as the face of a new rangers. He looked and sounded like some shipyard union man from the 70s not someone who is meant to be the face of some potential new consortium. I was cringing watching this. Peter Lawell and all Celtic fans must be laughing their heads off as we go from disaster to disaster. Green is not for budging unless he is going to make serious money from his investment. While i am on a rant it looks like the 1st div clubs dont want us either so its div 3 i think.

Believable14 Unbelievable7

Okay he was a bit rough and ready but at least he stood up and said something.

Agree0 Disagree5

What an insult to shipyard workers of the 1970s. Jimmy Reid, Jimmy Airlie and Sammy Barr were articulate intelligent men who put forward their views in reasoned and logical statements. Brown sounded more like a denizen of the Louden.

Agree5 Disagree1

At least he's showing some fight for something he cares about. Only thing that the Celtic fans are laughing at is the fact that us fans were taken for mugs and sat back and let this happen.

Supporter of Brown.

Agree2 Disagree2

Nice to hear from a clearly intelligent well meaning Rangerd fan for a change.

Agree1 Disagree1

Any takeover with Donald Findlay involved is a step back into the halcyon days of bigotry and sectarianism , Findlay was forced to resign from the old Rangers board for being a bigot and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the New Club , new start , fresh start .

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 15:59:30
RANGERS' pre-season is underway and 13 senior squad members have reported for the first day of training this morning.

Lee McCulloch - a likely contender to be named club captain by manager Ally McCoist - was amongst the first to arrive at the club's training ground at Auchenhowie at 9am.

And he was quickly joined by Kyle Hutton, Ross Perry, Kal Naismith and reserve goalkeeper Scott Gallacher.

Scotland defender Lee Wallace, who confirmed his commitment to the club earlier this week, joined the group as well.

And goalie Neil Alexander also showed up along with Kirk Broadfoot and fit-again striker Kane Hemmings.

Darren Cole is in the squad which is currently going through fitness tests after his loan spell at Partick Thistle last season.

And out-of-contract players Salim Kerkar, Chris Hegarty and Andy Mitchell are there too along with a selection of youths as they look to win new deals with the Light Blues.

Despite a turbulent last few weeks for everyone connected with the club, spirits were high as head of sports science Adam Owen put their players through their paces.

There was no sign of Alejandro Bedoya or Dorin Goian but they have been given extended holidays and are not scheduled to be back until late next week.

Carlos Bocanegra and Maurice Edu are also missing for now after their recent internationals with the USA and they are expected in Glasgow again in mid-July.

Believable3 Unbelievable5

I think it's disgusting McCoist was not present! Hardly leading by example. Would love to know his reasons.

SPM

Agree9 Disagree2

With both senior squad and junior squad 40 guys should have turned up today.
None of the undeclared international guys will sign over to the new club.
Today wasn't good at all.

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 14:18:36
now that wee look like going into 1st division what do fellow bears think about snappin up free agents ian black robbie niellson james mcfadden and tryin to buy the boy el alagui who impressed when falkirk dumped us out cup to me that would leave alexander with a back four of niellson goian broadfoot wallace in midfield mcculloch (our captain) black kerkar and hemmings wide and mcfadden and el alagui upfront i no its players we would nt usually look at but horses for courses and all that and surely they d be good enough to get us promotion

Believable12 Unbelievable3

Unforunately I don't think its going to happen. The BBC article that said plans were made to get us into Div one had no author attached to it. Looks like its just an unlikely piece to try and give us hope.

Besides the article also said that if we were to accept the deal then the newco would have to take responsibility for the oldco's debt and sins, etc. No chance. That looks way too vague and way too dodgy to be a part of. It would mean that the SFA could expel us for a start without having to prove anything because we have already accepted the blame and waived any legal rights away.

Agree3 Disagree3

Only one problem with that, where does the dough come from to sign them, granted most are free agents but wages will still be a problem as we don't have a pot to p**s in and fraudster Green has no money.

Supporter of Brown

Agree2 Disagree1

Best post i've seen for a while, Mainly because it's positive.
The team you mention would beat most SPL teams so I would be happy with that.
Big bonus if any young players still at the club can come through, As for the younger players that have left, Shame on you, You will never play in front of 50000 fans again and you forget the money and time spent training your ungrateful erses.
Jamie ness must have racked up thousands in medical bills, I would have loved the team built around him, But he couldn't even wait a season or 2, It will be his loss in time.
BR

Agree4 Disagree1

28 Jun 2012 14:18:05
50 year old man nicknamed "Bomber" to be electronically tagged for swearing incidents on Edmiston Drive on Thursday evening. Police say "We couldn't make out what he was saying but with a nickname like that we couldn't take any chances." There was suspicion at one point that it involved some sort of Jihad but it later emerged that it was an acronym for John IS Having A Diatribe.
One local was infuriated by the incident. "I was sure I recognised him from Paddy's market. I wanted socks and gave him a pound for three pair. Next thing you know he told me I would get a seat on the board and two debentures! Where are my socks?"

Believable13 Unbelievable4

28 Jun 2012 14:11:21
just watched bomber at ibrox last nite and was in shock at his performance.Not one question was answered about his consortium yet he asked plenty off greens.To see an ex player ranting like a street hood-rat and swearing(children where present) at the doors of ibrox was an absolute disgrace,if this is the new face of a new rangers its speaks volumes for how low rangers are ... effigies of murray and green with nooses round their necks was shocking but brown stating green will have no to place to hide was disgraceful....classless performance all round tbh.

Believable13 Unbelievable4

Wtf is it with us and all these colours, Brown Green Whyte, whats next

JG

Agree2 Disagree0

The pink panthers are next ,wouldnt mind that peter sellars. and britt was some bird lol doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 13:35:40
Proposals for RFC to enter Div 1.

The main points of proposal documentation viewed by BBC Scotland are:
•Rangers are to be relegated with immediate effect and replaced in the SPL by Dundee.
•Television rights for Rangers matches in Scottish Football League Division One are to be bought by the SPL for £1m.
•The SPL and SFL will merge into one body at the start of season 2013-14.
•Play-offs between the top two divisions will be introduced in time for the coming season with one team from the top flight and three from the second tier competing for a place in the following season's SPL.
•There will be an increase in the parachute payments made to clubs relegated from the SPL.
•Changes will be made to the distribution model for clubs in the top two tiers with teams in the lower leagues earning a similar amount to the current set-up.
•A new pyramid system will become effective from season 2014-15 that will allow a potential place in the new league format for a team from either the Highland league or newly-created 'Lowland League'.
•Rangers newco's acceptance into the Scottish FA would only be approved if they accept responsibility for the football debts and fines incurred by the pervious club along with their waiving of rights to a legal challenge.

Personally I think it stinks.
Firstly Dunfermline are stuffed after Aberdeen, Motherwell having been saved from relegation and Inverness Caledonian T being approved to ground share. Then SPL change capacity for seated stadiums reduced to 6000 so ICT could stay up in the SPL. The year ICT were allowed to ground share Partick Thistle were relegated while previously Motherwell and Aberdeen saved from relegation.
Television rights bought by SPL - what's this all about? Is that so RFC cannot do a private deal? what's the share to the clubs? Didn't think Div 1 games were televised previously or is this so they can make a buck on the back of the newco? In any Saturday during the season the SFL total attendances in the 3 divisions totals approx 17,000. What happens if a company outbid the SPL? How much is the SPL getting from SKY/ESPN for this and are any of the clubs in the SPL getting a share? Does this keep the SPL tv deal on track?
SFA changing their stance on newco's acceptance? What does 'accept responsibility' entail? and to give up all legal rights? sounds like there is something brewing. Still to hear the outcome of the SPL's enquiry into second contracts. Does this mean that whatever can be thrown at the oldco will stick with the newco and they will pay for it?
while Insolvency legislation stipulates what happens to the debt and who owes it.
A knee jerk reaction is not always the best to go by - but reading this I would say, forget it, just put the key in the door and let Green have his sale.

Believable6 Unbelievable0

The biggest stumbling block for me in this is how anyone can be expected to agree to a clause which states "you accept responsibility for the football debts and fines incurred by the oldco -AND - give all rights to legal challenge"...

No one can accept such broad terms . You could be agreeing to pick up a tab for multi-millions of pounds...then what?

The rest of it I think you can live with give and take the odd tweak but the "accept responsibility" clause for me is a major deal breaker.

There should at least be a CAP on what any fines / penalties etc could be so that Green at least understands the worse case scenario.

SPM

Agree1 Disagree0

It sounds real dodgy, doesn't it. All that talk about giving up legal rights and such. Doesn't look good and sounds really vague and without definition. The rest I wouldn't mind, SPL can have the TV money if it means Rangers get into Div One.

Agree1 Disagree1

SFA and SFL now deny new changes for 1st division. Sorry but it was on the BBC Scotland so it must be right!

Agree0 Disagree0

With hindsight, would it not have been a hell of a lot simpler for the SPL to just relegate Rangers as punishment and reinstate Dunfermline? We could have avoided all of the politics...all of the rush to merge leagues etc....

SPM

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 12:55:04
Why all this talk about newco oldco etc. Here is my take on it

Rangers football club ltd - a company

There entry in companies house

Status: In Administration
Date of Incorporation: 27/05/1899

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Public Limited Company
Nature of Business (SIC):
93120 - Activities of sport clubs

They owned a stadium, a team, and various other assets.

Rangers football club Ltd (for now sevco)

Now own a stadium, a team (Rangers) various other assets.
The company may be new but it is the same stadium, same team and all other assets are the same

Now give it a rest with oldco newco

JG

Believable8 Unbelievable5

They bought it from the liquidated company! Hence the reason its a new company.Why cant you get it?

Agree0 Disagree0

Having wound-up the company's affairs, the liquidator must call a final meeting of the members (if it is a members' voluntary winding-up), creditors (if it is a compulsory winding-up) or both (if it is a creditors' voluntary winding-up). The liquidator is then usually required to send final accounts to the Registrar and to notify the court. The company is then dissolved.

Do you understand what the word dissolved actually means? Finshed gone for ever? soem when may buy the old "work place and employ some of the staff" but they can not or ever be the same company. And here another little thing for you since Duff and Phelps forgot?// to hand in the accounts,,,,In the event the company does not file an annual return or annual accounts, and the company's file remains inactive, in due course, the Registrar at Companies House will strike the company off the register. Gone for good then?? understand that yet?? NEWCO means exactly that its NEW no accounts no history, no work force working until enrolled starting ANEW. The lights are out and new owners have to put them back on....

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 13:20:36
13 players turn up for training 2 of them goalkeepers and 3 of them out of contract and why r the players wearing old rangers training tops with 5stars on them cant they afford new tops yet

Believable7 Unbelievable5

Trying to pass themselves off as the old liquidated club breaks insolvency laws. When are they going to start doing the correct things?

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 12:54:02
Just read Jardines comments on SSN regarding the 9 players walking away:
"what they have done is seen an opportunity - whether it is them or their agents - to maximise their income. I have to be honest and say i think the players have used our predicament to their gain"
Well said Sandy your 100% bang on the money there. The traitor 9 should never be allowed back to ibrox again. I have been a season ticket holder for 12 years and contributed to there wages and feel absolutely robbed by these cheats.
If they had wanted to leave beacause of a lower division...then a would have gave them a pat on there back and thanked them for there service to the club IF they had transfered there contracts over and left for small transfer fees. What i CANT stand is the fact a squad valued betwen £15-£25m has walked away for free! Most of which will end up in cash rich English league on better wages with massive signing on fee. Really cannot understand fellow bears that have sympathy for them...WAKE UP...they have all robbed US the fans!!

Believable7 Unbelievable9

Those players have already taken a 75% pay hit that is not going to come back to them. So they owe Rangers NOTHING and rangers actually owe them a big whack in back pay. If they decide to recoup some of that by exersing their legal rights not to transfer into a team that has no place to play and no visible means of support who can blame them. Also if they are sold by new co- what guarentees are there the money will go to rangers and not be creamed of int Greens back pocket. The fans are not playing ball and buying season tickets, so why should the players

Agree5 Disagree4

I'll think you will find its the people who have ran the club into the ground, who gave robbed the club. I don't blame the players! What makes you so sure Green would let them go if they moved over to the newco? He could have held them to their contacts!
Big Blue

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 12:51:48
can't wait for the dust to settle and the new season to start!

I like the idea of the new league setup with playoffs!

Rangers in the first division is fair considering the real punishment is watching the core of our championship winning squad leave for nothing!

I heard that theres a deal with sky espn to have some of the rangers games broadcast live for 1million!

Still don't know whats going to happen with Ibrox and murray park can we afford to keep these assets?

Believable2 Unbelievable4

Once again sfa bending over backwards trying 2 help sevco get in 1st division so lets hope thats a end 2 this rubbish every one is out 2 get us. and by the way the songs that were sung at the protest were disgusting and poeple wonder why so many dont like us

Agree6 Disagree4

@1 Agree 100%.Bet nothing done about the songs or singing though----some things just don't change.It's the mentality of these fans----tv cameras there etc.They don't care what anyone thinks.Sad.

Agree2 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 12:11:08
anyone who thinks charles green is going to be pushed into to selling rangers is naive,he holds all the aces and a shrewd investment for 5.5 million,looks like only a serious offer and serious profit will buy him out,unlike most of the rangers players....he doesnt do walking away!

Believable8 Unbelievable2

28 Jun 2012 11:32:39
BBC Scotland has learned of plans being put in place that would allow Rangers to move directly into Scottish Division One in the coming season.

Rangers FC plc is soon to be liquidated and Charles Green's consortium are reforming the club.

But Green's Rangers newco has not gained support to replace the old club in the Scottish Premier League.

And senior Scottish football figures are proposing that Rangers start season 2012-13 in the second tier.

There are also plans for the SPL and Scottish Football League bodies to be merged into a new organisation called 'The Scottish Professional Football League' in 12 months' time.

The main points of the proposals are:

Rangers are to be relegated with immediate effect and replaced in the SPL by Dundee.
Television rights for Rangers matches in Scottish Football League Division One are to be bought by the SPL for £1m.
The SPL and SFL will merge into one body at the start of season 2013-14.
Play-offs between the top two divisions will be introduced in time for the coming season with one team from the top flight and three from the second tier competing for a place in the following season's SPL.
There will be an increase in the parachute payments made to clubs relegated from the SPL.
Changes will be made to the distribution model for clubs in the top two tiers with teams in the lower leagues earning a similar amount to the current set-up.
A new pyramid system will become effective from season 2014-15 that will allow a potential place in the new league format for a team from either the Highland league or newly-created 'Lowland League'.
Rangers newco's acceptance into the Scottish FA would only be approved if they accept responsibility for the football debts and fines incurred by the pervious club along with their waiving of rights to a legal challenge.
It is understood Rangers chief executive Green has been "briefed" by Hibernian chairman Rod Petrie on the plans to gain their approval.

All these changes have to be approved by SPL and SFL clubs over the next few days.

Division One clubs Falkirk, Raith Rovers and latterly Morton have voiced their opposition to any plans to place the Rangers newco in the second tier.

With no Rangers currently in the SPL, 'Club 12' is listed on the league's fixtures for season 2012-13 and Dunfermline, who were relegated from the top flight last season, expected to be reinstated.

Dundee, who finished second to promoted Division One champions Ross County last season, have not gone public with their view on who should take the place of Club 12.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

If this is true then the only fair thing to do is keep Dunfermline in SPL and also promote Dundee with the rule starting from next season being two up two down.

Agree2 Disagree0

Just one problem with that article. Nobody has actually put their name to it. It looks a bit fishy to me.

Agree0 Disagree0

It'll be all sorted in favour of Ibrox side(whatever the name may be)Deals all done and dusted no doubt.Should be Div 3 but then,''this club is too big'' so they say

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 10:34:27
Last night at Ibrox the question was asked "Who is backing you, John?"

John Brown responded "I can't tell you that, as the media will dig dirt and hound them out."

So it's okay for John Brown to hide his backers, but not Green.

Really?

Believable14 Unbelievable2

John Brown said he would name the investors as soon as green brings a deal to the table. green said he would name 20 investors, he has now bought the club and still not named them ..because he has none. also why did he say ian hart was 1 when ian hart said he has nothing to do with the whole thing.

Agree0 Disagree6

So his backers have dirt in their backgrounds? Findlay was previously mentioned.....was he on an EBT? Or did he get sacked b4 the EBTs?
The Legends mentioned were all on EBTs and nobody is quoting how much cash they're chipping in. Probably just allowing their names to be used only.

Agree5 Disagree1

Yes.Kind of defeats the purpose of what the protest was all about,honesty and clarity required.

Agree6 Disagree0

More worrying is that he knows there is dirt to dig up.

Mac2.

Agree6 Disagree0

What an embarrasment to the club john browns statement was celtic fans no every fan against rangers must have been laughing their tits off please keep idiots like this away from the club or he will divide the fans opinions and when that happens we wont have a club to follow wether its in the 1st div or any other. lets get behind green and give the guy a chance his was deemed the best offer by the administrators to save the club so give him a chance and get behind him and the club.

Agree7 Disagree1

Appears that main backer is Johnathan Hope. Agent that touted Gordon Smith for the Director of Football job at Liverpool. This guy has more skeletons in his cupboard and can understand why Bomber wanted to keep his name out of it at moment. No way this guy has millions, just another chancer courting the publicity. He wouldn't pass the fit and proper test in any event.

Agree6 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 10:30:48
One thing that ticked me of last night when he said to the crowd "you are the investors". This patenly not the case. I doubt any of the assembled "fans" were investors. They were customers. It is not their season ticket money that ran the club. There was a £15million per annum short fall. That works out as each "fan" being subsidised over the last 10 years to the tune of £400 per annum. This subsidy being made up of stolen taxes, money syphoned out of MIH, "Investments" by Davve King, ENIC, Joe Lewis and Ellis a 27million pound sting on ticketus and ripping of about £30million from other traders and football teams.

If you look at it like that the fans are to blame, they got what they want, they just did'nt pay for it.

Believable7 Unbelievable6

28 Jun 2012 08:42:10
When will you bigots ever learn...you organise a protest which I agree with...then with the eyes of the media watching you come out with your bile of songs..derrys walls etc...no wonder nobody wants you in their league..when you have supporters like that,rangers have many decent supporters this is a great time to wipe slate clean and do away with any songs that have nothing to do with football

Believable26 Unbelievable8

Totally agree with you mate,
i think it's a great time to start afresh,
we have no real option but to put our trust in charles green and wipe the slate clean from walter smith and all the other so called rangers men ,where were they when green stepped forward to buy the club?...also let's get away from the no surrender mentality and start singing rangers songs

Agree10 Disagree1

Couldn't agree with you more mate.Debacle from beginning to end.Makes you wonder if there is anything worth saving.We seem to have a never ending conveyor belt of morons representing us .BlackpoolBear.

Agree10 Disagree1

As a tic man most Bears are good lads, our neighbours workmates etc...but these b*ms keep dragging you down. Shame

Agree7 Disagree1

Just on the same day a momentous historical handshake took place over the water. Signifying trust partnership and a positive and peaceful future for those poor suffering people of that land.
Over here we have this ancient vile nonsense going on.

Agree8 Disagree2

I agree with you too it really is time to move on from certain songs. Perhaps the op own fans could do likewise, or mabe he could say a few words to put them down also, and mabe that way by removing your own denial we can all move on together..Group hugs all round.

Agree3 Disagree1

There was more shame brought on the club last night than in all the sorry business put together.Felt totally ashamed of those fans singing,indeed the whole thing was shocking.

Agree6 Disagree2

The singing last night was a total embarrassment, its 2012, lets move on and rise above the past, we are rangers fans, no1 in the land, we have a chance of a new fresh start, lets change the song book, and let others sing bigotry songs, this is our chance to move onwards and upwards.

Agree2 Disagree0

27 Jun 2012 17:15:28
Jardine going off on one again today on RTV when will this loud mouth keep quiet?
He needs to read the book how to make friends and influence people...
Also, the news about the assets being hived off - According to the title deeds lodge with the Registry of Scotland, the floating charge transferred to previous owner Craig Whyte is still outstanding over the Murray Park training ground in Auchenhowie Road, Milngavie. However, it is unclear if this would have any impact on Sevco's ownership of the facility is a strange development, not sure I quite understand it, what's your thoughts ED:?

Believable8 Unbelievable2

28 Jun 2012 09:52:03
11 players have reported for training. 2 of them are goalkeepers so not a complete team

Believable9 Unbelievable6

10 first team turned up and only 3 youth team.
Ally didn't show.
Edu, Bocanegra, bedoya and Goian no show plus the 10 rebels.....
Source STV and bbc sport websites.

Agree4 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 09:43:17
If the billionaire mr mcoll is a rangers man why is the club dead he could have put 20 million in the cva pot which would probably be accepted they would still be in the spl with all the players and history intact he could then still have had a share issue and if he wanted took his original investment back out instead he did nothing but stand around and watch his club die is this really the sort of man you want at your club. Tulip

Believable10 Unbelievable5

He could also have gone 50/50 with the current consotium or any others who were being considered at that time. I have posted previously that i cant believ these wealthy guys who are seemingly rangers minded stood back and watched us go down the tubes rather than join together

JG

Agree2 Disagree0

Its all down to the ebts or bigtaxcase as you call it would you buy a bmw that was not running not having any idea how much it would cost to put it right

Lochaber Bear

Agree1 Disagree0

20m isn't short change maybe 2m not 20m. I love Celtic but would I put 20m into them......no. Have Celtic ever payed me for when I've been skint ? No. End of the day business/family comes 1st. He could maybe have put a a couple (couple bring 2 not 20) to help them asking him to anymore than that is a joke.

End of the days rangers fc are finished so far the new rangers fc have 11 players as of today who went to training. That's not even a team. Let's face it last night outside ibrox was a waste of people time. Don't pay for season tickets etc do you really think green cares ? He owns ibrox the training ground & the car park. He doesn't need to form a team. He can keep or sell his assesses to anyone he wants.so demos like last night don't bother him

Ed please post this as my recent posts havent been going up,not having a pop at Newco when there down but people are still being fee BS more so like last night

Lenny

Agree1 Disagree1

Lenny its all relative, if you have 50k in the bank then a few hundred or even a grand is not a large amount of money. If you have 500 million then 10 20 million is not a large sum

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh and by the way if asking him to invest is a joke then you lot are taking the p@ss with your sugar daddy each year when it comes time for the bail out

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 08:18:47
Where is either the logic or morality in the views of the likes of Sandy Jardine? "All the players of the previous Rangers club should join the new club so that they can be sold so that the new club can make some money by selling them?" When the new club would have not paid a penny for them? What about all the companies and people left in debt ( to say nothing of those who as a result have lost their jobs and their families are now struggling financially ...unlike Sandy Jardine!) by the actions of the old club. If there is any " spare money " floating around it should go to paying off those left in debt by the old club. Perhaps not a legal requirement now but surely for an honourable insitution the only correct action? But no... Jardine blasts footballers who are only acting within their rights as former employees of the old club. Not because he is thinking of their interests or debtors interests but only Rangers interests! Does he not get it ? Rangers credibility is shot and thats what they need to work on to recover over the coming years.
Just how arrogant and blinkered can any one person be?

Believable13 Unbelievable6

Onr problem with your thinking there. The sins of the past were committed by the OLD company. This is now the NEW company we are talking about. Mr Green does not owe anybody else ANYTHING, even those clubs who were cheated by the OLDCO.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 08:17:14
With all these players walking away us bears have been lied to, rangers is was just another club to this guys, just another club, we are nothing now, we should just take over linfield Irish league champs for next however guaranteed european entry les travelling for some of our loyal fans there will always be a rangers but we are nothing now green and brown is screwing us over

Believable5 Unbelievable5

Can we please drop the Ulster connections!! New club, new start. After all 2 Ulstermen and "diehard" Rangers men walked out on us.
J1985

Agree3 Disagree3

To op wise up linfield and Irish league football are $hit and I'm from NI at 1 I'm disgusted by the 2 players from NI I won't even name them because they're nothing but gutter rats but don't go blaming us gd supporters from NI we give a lot each week home and away not to many fans travel by boat or plane weekly and I mean weekly home and away to see their team so wise up and think about what you saying. BLUNTRU72 LLRFC NI BEAR

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 07:32:34
I liked John Brown as a player, and I also played against him both as a player and as the Rangers u18 and reserve manager.

What I cant understand is how he managed to keep his job as a scout when we have signed far more duds, than good players.

Believable11 Unbelievable5

28 Jun 2012 06:25:28
Why is Rangers so divided and disloyal?

Believable12 Unbelievable6

That's a bit unfair. It's just a consequence of their current predicament - all clubs would be the same. HH

Agree0 Disagree3

How can you agree or disagree with this, it is a question, if you have an opinion provide an answer

If the OP does not already know the answer then they must have been on the moon for the last year, if you never noticed we are crisis, meltdown, we have been lied to, cheated, swindled by previous owners. we may not have a team to support shortly, now each supporter has an opinion of the way we should move forward, do you expect us all to agree 100% after what has gone on lately or are you an idiot? thats another question

JG

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 04:50:20
Engage the brain with this one chaps please. Numerous consortiums have came and gone through this circus to date. Ng, Murray, Kennedy, Smith, Green, who knows who else. Is John Brown trying to say that INSIDE SEVEN DAYS he can put together TWO completely different consortiums? He has missed his calling, he is clearly the new Bob Geldof. Two consortiums in a week but not a chirp out of him pre CVA? From one consortium with a guy who spent his cash to play at Parkhead to a consortium with a who's who of Rangers legends, it gets more and more bizarre and frankly desperate by the minute. If you took this script to the Coen brothers they'd tell you Lord Of The Rings is more plausable.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

28 Jun 2012 01:22:02
Just a thought, could all the players that are doing the walking away and raising objection to the new-co be actually helping the cause. If green was planning on using the transfer fees from selling them on in his business plan, his plan is in trouble and he will need to sell, to walters mob, bombers mob, whoever. If he sells the new-co on to either (lets hope they are together in conversation and dont bid against each other -that would just add to our credibility-not, rather pool resources and pull together) then can the players then withdraw their objection to their contracts being transferred. Power to the players if this is the case. I find it strange that our success has been built on the team spirit in recent years rather than individual skills, yet they are fragmenting! What does bomber know that is so interesting ? must be a case that it would finish off everything otherwise he would have outed the issue, and any agreements reached will include him keeping quiet. As for his interviw, he was honest passionate and concerned and fair play to him we need more of this! had the gers come out of admin with a group that werebusiness men suitable to move forward nothing would have been heard, when concerns are raised it takes time to put together a plan of action, bomber and watties groups may have felt others were better placed than then to avoid liquidation, that was not the case so they now feel its happened and its now within our ability to be better placed to move forward. Just wish they would all get together and sort it out between them - if they are all doing it for the love of the club - our club.

Believable1 Unbelievable5

Rangers don't do pulling together, haven't you realised that yet? Nearly as many supporters bodies as players currently. Bids and counter bids from numerous "Gers minded" people, all of whom contribute to undermining the guy at the helm currently. Split opinion on the players that left, split opinion on which division the team go into. Short of wanting the team to be successful I've rarely seen a unified Rangers on any issue, apart from the almost universal backing of Craig Whyte strangely.

Agree2 Disagree1

27 Jun 2012 23:56:42
I was at the demo tonight, and listened to what Brown said, he seems to be convinced that Whyte is involved in this still.
Green apparently said to Brown that he is the boss and Brown was just a scout and they would see who would last longer.
Apparently Brown had emailed a bid to all named investors of Greens consortium an hour before the meeting of £8.7m.
He asked Green what he had put into Rangers and
Green handed him a bit of paper with £8.7 m written on it as if to say no profit, no sale.
Brown asked him for proof that he owns the assets, and he would produce the money needed, Green would not provide proof.
Brown also stated that Green had said something that would sicken us to the core, but refused to say what it was, fearing a riot I think.
He also mentioned that Gough, Amoruso, Laudrup, Albertz are involved and will put their money in. He is asking fans not to give Green a penny and give it to him to him to buy the club.
I have been posting on here for months that we as fans have not done enough to force change, we need to do what the Celtic fans did, take to the streets and demand change and be there until it happens. I got the feeling that tonight was the beginning of that, I think this will gather pace.
I have also stated that we should back Green as he was the only game in town, I regret saying that, I think Green is going to put us into admin again and sell the assets.

I am not sure Bomber is the man to lead this as he is a bit rough, and does not come over too well but there is no doubt he has the gloves off and don't think I would like to be facing him.

One bad point, the subject of other Scottish clubs came up and am afraid Bomber lost it a bit and the language was a bit blue. No need for this and if he is going to be the face, he needs to watch his words. I am afraid the arrogance showed its face and I don't think that did him any favours.

One funny point, during Johns speech, right outside the front door, he asked a rhetorical question, "so where do we go now", and one guy shouts "through that f...ing door. Everybody had a laugh except the local police.

I have had doubts about Green, I think we all have, but I will not give Green my money, there is to much unproved, investors, money , who owns the assets etc etc. These answers are easily proved, show the documents.

Until you do you are getting none of my money.

We need Rangers men, not some Yorkshire pudding.

Believable8 Unbelievable12

I am sorry ,but last night was a farce.Big Bomber,great team player,leader on the park,but! not the leader of a consortium that requires millions of pounds to save,let alone finance Rangers.Lets get real,SFA,will i suggest cut us some slack,hence the muted drop to div 1.we must be aware that the other clubs hold all the aces,and has been posted before,a little bit of contrition and regret would go a long way with some fair minded chairmen,after all ,our debt,should not become their debt,no matter how many fans from Rangers fill away grounds,we have a moral responsibility to serve our punishment,and do it with a bit more dignity than has been shown of late.

Agree2 Disagree0

Johnathan Hope (football agent) involved with Brown , I am sure whoever wants Rangers and they are not many will have to offer more than the £8.5 that has been offered,

Agree0 Disagree1

27 Jun 2012 22:32:33
I fully understand the scepticism of some fellow Bears regards Charles Green. I myself am sceptical however those fans and in particular the RSA and RST need to be very careful with the "strategy" they are attempting to force Charles Green out.

Looking at things as black and white as i possibly can, let's consider the options we have as alternatives to Charles Green:

1. John "Bomber" Brown. He claims to have wealthy backers from all over the World in his consortium YET is on TV tonight pleading with supporters to give his group their season ticket money in order to force Green out.

Could that statement by Brown be any more contradictory?

How does that "plan" differ in principal to what Craig Whyte did with Ticketus?

How could Bears support Browns plan to pledge season ticket money when most of them are convinced that what Green is planning to do? Seriously, do my fellow Bears actually listen to what is being said.

So to keep this simple, let's recognise Brown genuinely cares but the fact is he hasn't got a penny to his consortiums name despite the claim of wealthy backers from all over the world.

2. Option 2. Walter and McColl. I am not convinced we've geared the end of this one. I think McColl is playing the long game with Green / Zeus. Whilst I understand that from a business perspective, we all know it is very difficult to apply the laws of normal business to football.

The reality is if McColl with Smith as his frontman really wanted to save Rangers they had 4 months to do so....and instead they chose an hour before Green and Zeus took over the assets. They chose NOT to put any money up!

This brings me full circle to Charles Green and Zeus. Whilst I may still be suspicious of him, there is an old saying that you should judge people as you find them....and not what you hear or think about them. In that respect, can any rational Bears disagree with the following facts:

1. He was the ONLY one to stump up any money...£5.5M. All the others....TBK, Kennedy, McColl said the right things but they didn't lay a penny on the table....

2. Green is quite right in expressing his disgust at those players who have declined to transfer their contract to the newco. He has NEVER said they would not be allowed to leave. The likelihood given what we are facing with the SPL and SFL is that he would need to let them go and / or accept transfer requests. Therefore I share the disappointment that players did not move across to the Newco to allow the club to at least received some much needed capital. After all, any club getting McGregor or Naimsith for £1.5M is stil getting a major bargain and highly unlikely clubs would be scared off by that level of price tag.

The time to pressure someone is when you have an "ace up the sleeve"....in other words you cannot lose! I wish supporters would actually realise there's is no "ace" up the sleeve and therefore we are calling Green / Zeus's bluff by these pathetic demos and threats against him.

I think it's time to take a leap of faith with Green as he is the only show in town.

We should commit to our season tickets for next year regardless f which league we're going to be in. For Gods sake, Green has even offered to reimburse part of the season ticket money if we are playing in an inferior league.

I would actually encourage Green to sell Murray Park. I do not think it is essential nor has it delivered upon its investment of £14M. Rather than threaten Green, perhaps RSt and RSA Neanderthals could try constructive dialogue with Green and suggest such a move....working together!

In closing....we are deeply scarred after the events of the past 12 months. That is understandable. There is unbelieveable levels of emotion almost unique to an institution like RFC. However eventually, we are going to have to show a little trust otherwise we will never move forward and be trapped forever more. Right now Charles Green has done NOTHING wrong! Sure he's mouthy with the media and a bit arrogant...almost Clough-like....but when you are screwed as we are you need a fighter to pull you through and I think Green is a scrapper.

Let's not screw up what right now is our ONLY hope who has actually put his money where his (big) mouth is. No one else has....and Bomber and his merry "Rangers Men" want to fund their revolution with our season ticket money....THAT IS CONCERNING......

SPM

Believable7 Unbelievable2

I am a Celtic fan and read this post with an open mind. I think that SPM makes some valid points and agree with him in almost everything. The most striking observation is how much he cares for his club as it should be. Brown comes across as a reactionary, uneducated mouthpiece.

For fans like the original poster it is high time you all stand together before a civil war starts that will set you back years. Otherwise the end is nigh. Good post

Jim Dhoc

Agree1 Disagree0

28 Jun 2012 00:04:33
please can yous stop saying that the old rangers have millions of fans around the world and they are behind a snub to the new co ,its an utter embarresment if thers millions how come the protest last night only attracted under a 1000 fans the fact is this NO one stood up to save rangers when it matterd but now ther is no debt its a scrum for the rich pickings of the future it makes me sick and has made my mind up for me when rangers died it was over good luck to all of you that wants to dream thers a future thers not its over even the fighting fund has gone with no answers it hurts to say it but are bitter rivals across the city have more devotion than we ever had and if we would have just listened to them with ther paranoia that were the f==k was this money was comming from for these players i think we might just might be in a better place ,its just kills me to think that when we were lifting cups over the past 20 years it was killing our club and we were celebrating it makes me cry ,for me my heart died with rangers and will not start beating again with some newco but the vocals of these past hereos as we call them is just a slap in the face ,i know every body will agree with me but i know the proper fans deep down do, so good bye my rangers and good luck to the rangers but i will not be a fan ,william fa denny

Believable21 Unbelievable21

Me myself will not follow a newco its never gona be the same' shame on all to do with rangers this was just not white who done this, the seeds were planted well before he came for the death of this club ,no one can tell me that smith to ally to all the board didnt know what was going on in some capasity they should have stood up the minute they knew, its a bitter pill to swallow but celtic have spent within ther means for years ,and this proves that ther club is run right and will be around for many years to come , the fact is what this poster said is when it matterd no one stood up to save rangers and ther history and celtic fans will NEVER let us forget that so for me its the final whistle ,GOOD NIGHT MY RANGERS ,i cant beleave ya gone my old pal sleep tight, this is the last i will ever speak of rangers

Agree3 Disagree2

Good riddance. Supporters like you aren't needed!

TTG

Agree1 Disagree1

Everyone entitled to their opinion William and it appears you've made your mind up to throw in the towel.
It has been a long hard road since February 14th for all RFC fans,but my feeling is we have to see this out a bit longer.
People question why guys like J.McColl,
Walter,and JB,did not bid earlier for the club.
They are being accused of trying to get the club on the cheap.
Personally i don't think this is the case at all.
Even Donald Trump said it was too much of a risk financially.
Liquidation was inevitable.
A cva was never really going to be accepted unless a significantly larger amount of money was offered.
The responsibility for this was never with any new prospective owner.
They would simply have been throwing good money after bad.
Money that is needed to stabilise the club for the future.
There is also a genuine concern that CW is pulling the strings behind the scenes.

"Bomber" may not be the most eloquent speaker in the world,so what,we all know where his heart is, he's a Ranger through and through. He does make some good points.
Who does own the assets? Let's see the signed off documentation from D&P confirming that they have done due dilligence on Sevco,and received the £5.5million. Admittedly i've had mixed feelings regarding CG,and did at the outset advocate we get behind him. However, he has not been open with the fans nor the players.
The questions do now need to be answered regardng his plans, proof of ownership and funds.
Charles Green does not strike me as the silent type,prefrring to do his work away from the spotlight. He has already blown that assumption out of the water,with the rediculous claims he has made.
So why has he not done more to convince the supporters,and the players who have walked away.
That's why we have to test his resolve,and question his financial sustainability...without our money!
Otherwise,i'm not investing in you.
Risky?..Yes. But easily rectified.
Show us the colour of your money Mr Green.
P.O.B.

Agree0 Disagree1

Nope!

the old rangers have millions of fans around the world.

Agree0 Disagree1

Rangers, whether it's Glasgow Rangers, The Rangers, The Gers or whatever will always be around as long as we the supporters are around. I used to go with my dad and my granda, I now go with my son and he will being his son and it is for that very reason that Rangers will go on. The supporters are Rangers - we are the institution that is Rangers. Material objects such as stadiums, players etc can be established again as long as the real Rangers keep believing. The Rangers name represents an institution around which the people can congregate and celebrate their identity. That will continue. Charge of our institution used to be in safe hands - names like Waddell and Struth. Unfortunately unscrupulous people managed to use their wealth to get their hands on the club and it was for all the wrong reasons - they sought adulation and recognition and put that before both common and business sense. They raped and pillaged the club and have now run for cover while the real Rangers (the fans) are left to suffer and take the flak. Make no mistake though - Rangers will be back, no matter how long it takes, because we are Rangers. Let's take our medicine, pay our dues and get the right people steering the club again. Even if it means missing a season or starting again in the 3rd division then that's what we do. The important thing is that one day we will be back and we as Rangers men will again have somewhere to go on a saturday afternoon to celebrate our identities and participate in the game that we have all come to love.

Agree1 Disagree1

27 Jun 2012 21:21:55
Super sally walks, as charles green offer of a non contract, as hes on a trail period of 13 weeks (3months)

Believable10 Unbelievable16

 
Change Consent