Rangers Banter Archive March 29 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


29 Mar 2012 23:14:54
so the sfa case is postponed due to whyte and his cronies the sfa is a laughing stock this would never have alowed to be postponed in any other country it would be sorted we need clarity and whyte out the picture asap admin need get there finger out this should be sorted by now

Believable5 Unbelievable0

29 Mar 2012 22:30:55
alright guys this whole scenario has been planned in some sort, way before whyte did the reservoir dogs walk down edminston drive.He personaly goes to court to have D&P as administrator,One of their men also did the walk i believe. then after being hand picked they suddenly want to distance themself from whyte? then say he is not a distraction to the club when lookikng for buyers? how? he still holds the cards i think and is playing the lot of us fans , media, courts, some pair of baws for a wierd looking fud.
heres hoping it all ends good in some way

rangers till i die

Believable6 Unbelievable1

Loved the way you signed off there. "some pair of baws for a weird looking fud" is a classic line.

Made me smile.

pappy

Agree2 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 22:23:41
Celtic should change there name to circus fc and lennon is the ring master.....trueblue.

Believable10 Unbelievable11

It's rangers that's providing the circus fun mate. clowns in charge. owners ready to pitch the tent and move on at any minute and nobody is getting paid ! roll up roll up.

Agree12 Disagree9

29 Mar 2012 20:46:18
Companies act 2006 with a bit of luck this can be proved against CW !

Assistance for acquisition of shares in public company

(1)Where a person is acquiring or proposing to acquire shares in a public company, it is not lawful for that company, or a company that is a subsidiary of that company, to give financial assistance directly or indirectly for the purpose of the acquisition before or at the same time as the acquisition takes place.

(2)Subsection (1) does not prohibit a company from giving financial assistance for the acquisition of shares in it or its holding company if—

(a)the company's principal purpose in giving the assistance is not to give it for the purpose of any such acquisition, or

(b)the giving of the assistance for that purpose is only an incidental part of some larger purpose of the company,

and the assistance is given in good faith in the interests of the company.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

Do you think Whyte's an idiot who just walked into this? This is what he does,it's his business.This guy has everybody by the plums and will run his game plan out.Rangers fans are being emotionally blackmailed to keep a club running that cant survive without a huge cash influx.

Agree4 Disagree0

Hate to admit it but i just can't see a way out of this. BK'S been sent packing for chasing up D&P,why are they taking so long over this? It looks like a newco or nothing bears. Stevie-A-Bear

Agree2 Disagree0

Whyte borrowed money from ticketus and then transferred that debt from one of his properties/companies to the new one. whoever ticketus actually are, and how and when they met whyte are other questions. there isnt an easy way out of this.

Agree3 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 20:16:30
Has Rangers lost the big tax case?

Evidence:
Bain drops legal case.
Kennedy drops out of bidding.
Admin and Murray using liquidation language.
Guy on here says they have lost BTC and keeping it quiet.
SFA postpone hearing against rangers and Whyte.
Walter Smith uses Liquidation word twice today, he would never unsettle fans unnessesserally unless he was setting us up for the news.
RFFF takes care of Dunfermline.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

If this was the case why pay Dunfermline as it looks like they wont be in the SPL next season so any newco would not require there vote would have been better paying utd

Agree1 Disagree8

1. Kennedy‘s bid got rejected so he may come back with a better deal ( maybe ).
2. Stop with the tax case p!sh, nobody will know until the day it is announced, so nobody knows! its just rumours (scarmongering) and hearsay.
3. D&P. used the “ liquidation“ language on many occasions why? because quite simply it is always going to be a possibility until otherwise hense walter smiths comments, liquidation is more of a serious issue than the legends game.
3. WE only paid dunfermline because they were the only team that didn't kick us when we are down which meant they were respectful and indeed feeling sorry for us. not only did we pay it back because we owed them it, it is also because they have been supportive in a way, unlike dundee utd being unprofessional and thinkin they are it! they seem to forget they owe us money because of the abandoned game which we had to pay FULL price for the rescheduled match which wasn't fair, and before everybody jumps back on the bandwagon then I'm afraid to tell you they do owe us money why? because they said they would give us our money back which they DIDN'T so that's why their is kind of a bit of bad blood between us and utd and that's why we are refusing to pay them, so bears don't panic about liquidation things may be very very tight but they're is still a lot of support and fundraising. to keep our beloved club afloat so keep up the good work and don't let the celtic fans ever bring us down! and fellow bears? KEEP CALM AND FOLLOW ON! steeeeve

Agree7 Disagree0

Steeeeve; You cant be serious can you? Kennedy back with a better offer? Dream on,he never wanted to buy in the first place.You are correct on the tax case,no one knows for sure but even a win will leave a bill for 10-15m + legal costs.Liquidation is pretty much a cert i think,as the cash flow in is about to dry up.Instead of slagging other clubs off you should try and have a bit of humility,the way you are heading you might need friends.

Agree1 Disagree4

At the unamed poster, ?? if you read i put MAYBE in brackets i never said he would! and another thing, i guess you don't have friends when you come out with a negative attitude before you think ore even read! i never slagged any other team, so where you pull that from? if you are talking about utd then its clearly not slagging its mere of a fact and opinion. this is slagging “ wtf haha celtic or haha motherwell, oh woops look who's bottle has crashed now eh “ that is slagging, so please get your facts right., steeeeve

Agree4 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 20:13:38
So much for duff and phelps saying that whyte is irrelevant. Don't think so, this little weasel is going to the end of us. NEver have I seen such a repugnant man with the morals of an alley cat.
He needs to be made aware that he is not welcome and I for one won't be renewing my ticket when there is any sign of him at ibrox.
But as much as I despise him I have to say that he must have a melon sized pair of brass boz, he seems to have no regrets, no shame, and clearly no feelings for the gers?He is a charlatan, a con man, a liar, a money grabbing, back stabbing pile of s**t

Believable6 Unbelievable3

And he wont be around much longer if he knows whats good for him hes a midget tony mowbray a walking nightmare hes beat neil lennon into 1st place for most hated man in scotland

Agree5 Disagree1

Poor play, why is Lennon the most hated man in Scotland? What has he done to deserve that? What a joke of a statement

Agree5 Disagree4

You mean hated only by gers supporters, moron.

Agree5 Disagree4

I'm a gers fan who hates Craig whyte far more than Neil Lennon.

Agree3 Disagree2

@1, he just sumed up why your club needs to end! NL has done nothing to your club yet yous rly hate him but the SDM walters and others, your fine with for bringing your club to its END, yous are truley sad people because you cant se NL is not the problem!

Agree6 Disagree5

I dont hate Neil Lennon, I dislike him.... On the other hand i HATE Whyte.

Mr Blonde

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 19:41:23
So if duff and phelps decide that a bid is acceptable what are they going to do from there approach Craig whyte, who has made it clear he is there for the long haul, to say "could you please sell your 86% stake to these folk?". He has no obligation to sell HIS club.
Dan.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

He broke conditions of sale as well as not declaring his bankruptcy this could nulify deal

Agree4 Disagree6

29 Mar 2012 18:20:09
ive already posted this on the celtic pages so dont know if ed will post it here


There has been a lot of posts on here from celtic fans who continually say all rangers fans hate or detest Neil Lennon no doubt some do just as some Celtic fans hate Ally McCoist but the majority of Rangers fans i know have no love for the man but stop short of hating him. i can only tell you how i feel and why i feel this way no doubt i will get a trouncing for this.

I am not a Neil Lennon hater i dislike the man just about the same level as i disliked Strachan. saying that i disliked both of them more than any other manager in Celtics history, the reason for this is quite simply its down to how they handle themselves in front of a microphone. and how they are portrayed in the Media. every picture taken of Mr Lennon he is either Snarling/spitting or throwing/kicking something about, this does not help endear him to the general public (i know he has no control over what pics the media decide to show of him) but what Mr Lennon can control is how he behaves in front of the microphone.

As it has been stated before something like 26 games undefeated and not a whimper out of Mr Lennon some major decisions have gone for him ( Wallace goal in the 1-0 win December for instance) plus loads more and Loads have gone against him but as long as he won not a sound. what im getting at you cant have it both ways you either accept refs decisions whether they go for you or against you and get on with it, or you try and bring them to task every time they make a hash of it whether it goes for you or against you. Mr Lennon said the ref spoiled the game on Sunday by sending cha off he may be right but he spoiled it for you Mr Lennon. i do not recall him complaining that willie Collum spoiled the game when he denied a perfectly good goal against his team.
everyone one goes on about him being a bad loser well thats one of the things i respect him for who wants a good lose for a manager? not me. someone should show Neil Lennon how to lose with Dignity. maybe managers should do what they expect the refs to do at least be consistent bring them to task if they make a balls up regardless which way the decision goes or accept their decisions and move on.

one more thing i do not dislike all celtic managers i had great respect for Jock Stein and Tommy Burns and i just loved John Barnes and Tony Mowbury lol

Pad

Believable6 Unbelievable6

Well done mate, got to be the most sensible thing a Celtic fan has said on here

Quabba

Agree0 Disagree1

I thought i have made it clear that im a Rangers fan lol

Pad

Agree1 Disagree1

Couldnt care less, get over it!

J

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 17:55:56
Is the deep lying hatred R*****s 'fans' have for Neil Lennon perhaps elevated this year because he never lost a match at their cesspit of a stadium last season?

Believable8 Unbelievable11

What a completely pointless post. Your a pathetic troll tryin to stir up trouble. Get a life!
GCUK

Agree11 Disagree4

Really is one of the most childish posts ive seen, your hatred is clear to see, you can't even spell the Rangers.

Das Shadow

Agree7 Disagree3

Or is it because he believes in his own mind that everyone hates Septic, no team should be able to beat them, his attitude towards people, referees and in particular Rangers and the contempt shown by him during a match when he was a player, or is it because he is a sh**e manager whose tactics are questionable. With regards to not losing at Ibrox did it count you lost the league remember!

Agree6 Disagree5

U want to bring up when he was a player when he showed "disdain", i show alot more if i was racially and relgiously abused or assaulted numerous times or sent bombs

Agree5 Disagree4

29 Mar 2012 17:05:06
That bid from the dating site, ridiculous as it looked is starting to look attractive amongst all the recent developments.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

Probably them that got Murray and Whyte together, lol

Agree1 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 16:53:18
No matter the days of anxiety that come our way we shall emege stronger because of the triumphs to be overcome, Rangers is my club, Rangers is your club, United we stand.. RANGERS FOREVER... RTID... jsm

Believable8 Unbelievable8

"united we stand" its rangers fc not rangers united. Rangers are down the drain

Agree3 Disagree1

Down the drain yet still clocking up old firm wins eh??!! Championship winning game n the bottlers well.......bottle it!! Keep up your tradition of losing big games.....we'll keep up ours of winning them pal.
j1985

Agree3 Disagree0

You dont have any big games any more! while Celtic will have soo many to come for years

Agree0 Disagree4

Big game last sunday.....we lose celtic win the title, does this not constitute a big game ya numpty??
As for celtic's record in big games where do i start....Ross County, Braga, Utrecht, Rangers in league cup final last season, Inverness, Killie and last week......pretty obvious celtic don't have any bottle or desire when required eh!!
As for future big games...don't you worry pal we'll be around for a long, long time and will continue the great Rangers tradition of winning league titles and beating you lot!!!
J1985

Agree2 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 15:02:18
"To be a Ranger is to sense the sacred trust of upholding all that such a name means in this shrine of football. They must be true in their conception of what the Ibrox tradition seeks from them. No true Ranger has ever failed in the tradition set him. jsm

Believable2 Unbelievable12

Bears. You the fans need to do something. I don't know what, but it's your team and no one is going to save it unless you do. What are your fans associations doing.

Agree11 Disagree1

Aye the tradition of lying and cheating the taxman!

Agree12 Disagree10

No true ranger eh, so what defines a "true ranger" is it if he succeds so u can say he is a true ranger because he succeded, therefore by definition no true ranger can not succed

Agree0 Disagree2

29 Mar 2012 14:57:33
ok when do our financials have to be submitted ?... oh god what a mess we are in... jsm...

Believable5 Unbelievable1

Submitted to who, we're in admin, dont need to submitted anything now, why do you think CW put off the AGM and didnt get the books signed off.

Agree2 Disagree2

Well they have got to be submitted to the SFA/ SPL if you want to play in europe and also renew your membership to play in scottish football

Agree4 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 14:42:44
2 things to comment on here...martin bain fir starters ....feel theres more to the case being dropped than meets the eye as we will find out soon enuff.....thinking whytees about to get his asze felt.....also kennedy droppin his offer....never was serious ..just lookin for exposure and boy did he get it....his portfolio just got better or should i say ...more exposure again.....up the gers...deecee

Believable4 Unbelievable2

29 Mar 2012 14:39:48
Watch for the return of SDM.
This guy is like kaiser Soze, operating in plain sight yet no one can see what he's doing. It wouldn't surprise me if he is trying to perform his usual smoke and mirrors routine.

Believable6 Unbelievable2

I hope so, but this time we have to live within our means, sdm gave me and all us fans nine in a row and the happiest days of our lives, comeon sdm take us back ... jsm

Agree1 Disagree6

Good lord.Are you mad? Have a look at Murrays latest financials mate.More bank debt is the last thing he needs.Until the tax case is settled,no one will take on the potential level of debt.

Agree7 Disagree0

SDM is insolvent. No point looking in his direction for help.

Agree5 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 14:30:51
Duff and Duffer not paid Dundee United for the league match on the 19th March. What is going on with this firm, still working for Mr Tight or is there a long term plan.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

The long term plan is for duff and duffer to screw as much cash out of rangers as they can, they are hitting fans off with rubbish and fans are buying into it, you would think the REAL fans that Mr tight pulled the wool over wouldn't be so daft again, but guess what? They are.

The gers grim reaper.

Agree9 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 14:28:02
Whyte says would rather let club go into liquidation than sell to Paul Murray.
Kennedy bid rejected by D/P.
Heard strong rumours American bid involves Whyte.
Don't know what to think. Murray part of board that put us in this mess and Kennedy nearly killed Stockport County.
On the other hand Whyte is a little b**tard, to comment that would rather see club go into liquidation than sell to someone else is disgusting. Be interesting to see if it's only Murray he won't sell to, either way, I think there is still a lot of things being hidden from the 'Gers supporters about the running of the club over the last 20 years

Believable6 Unbelievable0

It seems the only intention Whyte ever had was to scavenge money. All evidence to date supports this and I fear he will keep going until this and his underlying aim of killing the club has been achieved.

Agree2 Disagree1

Its looking very grim fellow bears, i thought we could of got a cva through murrays consortium. i dont think anybody is gonna have the time to do anything, its funny when we think it might be ok that little a55hole appears in the papers saying he aint selling to murrays group...
craig+babybear

Agree0 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 14:26:58
administrators have just made a statement it is on the rangers website if anybody wants to read it

campbell

Believable0 Unbelievable1

29 Mar 2012 14:17:10
SFA disciplinary hearing tomorrow. Lord Nimmo Smith's report forms evidence against Rangers and Craig Whyte.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

29 Mar 2012 13:47:16
Well you gotta laugh at the cheek of rfc trying to get spl to go light on them,after announcing will pay pars 22000!!yet bump d.united out there outstanding 70grand& with a creditors list like a yellow pages,yet sandy jardine will have press taking pics handing over check as if this a huge headline.lmao,rfc the club with no shame,morales,scruples,integrity,weres the bids?all gone suddenly quiet??awe thats rite wernt yous told all pr spin.wee craigo the 1 who will decide if the club is sold,not ally,or duuf& duffer!!whytes plan all along is head rfc into admin,then lead upto liquidation...stevo

Believable12 Unbelievable7

Ed any chance you can edit his posts so they make sense? {Ed001's Note - if I knew what he was saying maybe.}

Agree3 Disagree5

It was the RFFF which paid Dunfermline not Rangers as such, the fund is not controlled by the administrators. Not so long ago Dundee United charged Rangers fans to attend a replay of a game at Tannadice that was abandoned, the RFFF thinking is they gained money from that so now they can wait.

Agree4 Disagree0

Wassssssssssssssup? you not undersatnd the meaning of bump ed?or understand the part list off creditors like a yellow pages??or sccruples.morals??or is it the admin or liquidation part??mmmmm or mabe pars lol....or simply pr spin...stevo {Ed001's Note - sorry, I only understand English, it would be nice if you could use it.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Well said they were quick enough to shaft us so they can wait,charging for match that was abandoned stinks so this is called karma.

Agree4 Disagree2

29 Mar 2012 13:41:39
Seems there a crisis looming at Celtic! Club lose four in a row.
Kilmarnock,Rangers, £21,000, Cha-Du-Ri appeal.
Going for five in a row next week when Neilly bhoy's at SFA. Stevie-A-Bear

Believable5 Unbelievable6

Oh I wish them well, I really do! LB

Agree3 Disagree0

Well you have 5 now lennon bombers only to be charged with assault,great country,watp,garlar07

Agree6 Disagree2

Totally off topic garlar! These nutters should've been jailed end of. No decent Rangers fan (include myself in that) would condone anything like this toward another human being. Although i would hastily add, this is nothing to do with it being NL, (before the ridiculous post's start suggesting otherwise) it's a flawed legal system mate! Stevie-A-Bear

Agree5 Disagree1

Banter steve,but youre right scots law is way outa date still in the 18th century,garlar07

Agree1 Disagree3

Fitting lack of evidence to a different crime to gain a possible conviction hardly justice more of a vendetta (guilty verdict just dont know to what crime ma lord maybe shortage on postage paid) If they were guilty of sending bombs through post should have got hammered end of if they were innocent should have walked end of

Agree1 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 12:25:00
Not sticking up for Lennon far from it , but really ? Is there NOTHING you can say to a ref these days, remember 'big dick' in his hay day going off on one, souness, strachan, I would say there is quite a list worse than lemon, but yea we've had the "respect" thing since then so rules are different I suppose, but what I do think an it has nothing to do with Lennon is that refs think they are ARCHIE an can effect the outcome of FINALS and SEASONS (member 98) and be non accountable !
Paul(anyone seen les on these pages recently)RFC

Believable4 Unbelievable3

Refs are getting tougher for sure. You can understand why, with all the chat about decisions going the wrong way. It doesn't matter whether the manager is correct or not, the point is that the ref has sole responsibility for applying the rules. If managers don't like that then the rules of footy need to be renegotiated.

Agree0 Disagree0

If I tell my kids off and I'm wrong and see it ...... I still wont back down! gees, its a matter of discipline ffs. How many decisions have gone agains other clubs, us included! Players and managers lose it now and again for sure, sometimes justified, sometimes not. But the constant petulance and from Mr Lennon agressive approach is just wrong plain and simple. Whether you have a point - being a twit and spitting the dummy puts you in the wrong. A few prima dona players and managers just need to grow up! LB

Agree3 Disagree3

Really mate , when I give my son a row for something he hasn't done , I feel terrible an the first thing I do is say "sorry son".. "it's called discipline" , your a nutter mate!
PaulRFC

Agree5 Disagree1

@3
Yes, I think refs (or their association) would do well to review matches in hindsight. Not to change results but to acknowledge their (genuine) mistakes.

Agree1 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 12:18:21
hey fellow bears, this tax case is dragging its heels and keep wondering if and when we will hear anything. Its always been our former owners party line that we will win the case so why doesnt he come out and say if this isnt the case he will meet the bill. cant see it tbh

Believable0 Unbelievable0

29 Mar 2012 12:00:11
Brian Kennedy complaining process taking too long despite his cash offer reportedly only being third best and with Whyte refusing to sell to Blue Knights under any circumstance, that leaves Club 9 Sports are most likely front runner from Administrators and CVA point of view.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Seriously Craig Whytes going down the right road to getting a new "contract".... An it ain't the sort you can negotiate !
Paul(C4 should do the trick)RFC

Agree4 Disagree0

Admin have rejected Brian Kennedy's bid.

source bbc sport website

quabba

Agree3 Disagree1

Liquidation is the answer. A new Rangers FC will be able to negotiate its way back in to the SPL far easier than any of the D&P/CW discussions about CVAs and takeovers which still leave the club open to all kinds of litigation (look at Portsmouth, arguably a similar club, to see the results of messy takeovers).

Agree2 Disagree2

29 Mar 2012 11:47:31
Ed what's happening mate , ticketus keep releasing statements saying it WASN'T a loan , but then there's talk of us having to pay interest on the "loan" we got from them, what is the crack mate?
PaulRFC {Ed001's Note - it is not a loan, that was my understanding. They had purchased the tickets, not lent the club money. I don't believe there is any interest payable, people just seem to be panicking (or hoping) that the situation is worse.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

No loan (unless something buried an a contract somewhere). Ticketus' original arguement was that the tickets are theirs regardless of a CVA. The court rules otherwise and made them a creditor like everyone else (i.e. the tickets aren't theirs, just a claim on their procedes).

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed I posted yesterday I think an it went like , why don't we give ticketus half the tickets for double the time, I no that's probably a stupid idea , but you replied to me something like , they would be looking for interest, or we would have to pay interest so my idea wouldn't really benefit us , could you clarify please bud?
PaulRFC
Ps, there HAS to be deal that gets them our tickets but doesn't cripple us in process? {Ed001's Note - to do that, you would be asking them to renegotiate the contract, basically doing you a favour. They aren't going to do that out of the goodness of their heart, they will want to see profit from doing so. That will come in the form of either interest on the money, probably in the form of an increase in the number of tickets they own.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Copy, understood ,
PaulRFC

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 11:03:43
Hope none of the supporters are
taken in by Martin Bains statement.
He walked away and took plenty from
your club. Keep that in mind.

Believable7 Unbelievable1

If your going to try an use the "walk away" phrase then use it right mate , Bain was actualy FORCED out, so stop trying to be smart eh ?
PaulRFC

Agree2 Disagree5

He walked mate and try as you might to
defend him he abandoned the support

Agree5 Disagree1

3) No. he was forced out he was suspended with no possibility of return. Really having seen what Whyte is like do you really believe he would have allowed him back?

GovanFR

Agree1 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 10:59:35
As a Celtic fan who would miss the
competition and banter with Rangers
I would urge supporters to take no
notice of reports in the Daily Record.
They have been spouting nonsense
about the Old Firm for years in their
rag. I hope that the mess SDM has
created for your club is sorted out
soon.

Believable14 Unbelievable2

29 Mar 2012 10:47:16
Well...Well...Welll.
Looks like Lenny Bhoy's been telling lies.
The Sun 29/3/12 - Robert Grieve:
Calum Murray claims Neil Lennon told him to 'get a f*****g grip' in their Old Firm tunnel bust-up at Ibrox. Murray opted to take action because Brines told him Lennon continually stepped out of line throughout the first half. He and Murray also faced each other in the referee's room before the start of the second half, where another exchange took place before the Celts boss was told he was banned from the touchline for the rest of the game. Lennon insisted in the after-match press conference that he did NOT swear during his conversation with the match ref. But that version of events is different to the two accounts filed by Murray and Brines. It's understood Rangers staff were present and will back up the officials report. Well, Well.. Well... Just like Neilly bhoy said.."It'll all come out in the wash"
Stevie-A-Bear

Believable8 Unbelievable7

It disny matter what the ref says stevie.....lennon has a witness lol. how bad did that sound "i never raised my voice or swore at the ref....i have a witness" cudny make this stuff up.
j1985

Agree4 Disagree6

There you go again. Lennon is always in the wrong according to you lot. Hope you
saw the picture of Brines with his finger in Neils face.

Agree9 Disagree2

Is that really ALL Lennon said ? That's nothing mate , I've seen players give refs more abuse than that an not even get booked before!
Paul(wishing he was back on his 20s)RFC

Agree9 Disagree0

The hatred shown to Lennon is a disgrace. And as PaulRFC says, even if that is what he said, big deal! The guy is just trying to do his job and look after his team in a way that any fan would want. We have bigger problems without this irrational.....and bigoted hatred of Lennon.
Bri1872

Agree5 Disagree2

@bri1872 at what point did any of the posters above make a biggoted comment about lennon?
Gazza72

Agree1 Disagree0

Sort of missing the point lads.
My post has got nothing to do with hatred. It's about facts. NL was on tv telling everybody that would listen including his own fans that hang on his every word that...
"My sending off was a joke"
"I never swore"
"I wasn't allowed to do my job properly" because he wasn't allowed to sit in the stand
He never made it clear that it was his own security that took this decision,therefore inferring that it was Rangers officials who banished him,it wasn't. Then we had the "Sums things up in this country" statement.
@Paul RFC. I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic or not about " is that ALL" But according to reports, that wasn't all that was said. Robert Grieve also said that NL was not reported for swearing.
Daily mail reporting that he is facing charges of " ‘dissent, the adoption of aggressive behaviour towards a match official and the repeated use of offensive, abusing and insulting language’ during the Old Firm derby. So that is not ALL mate. Stevie-A-Bear

Agree1 Disagree2

Rangers staff back up ref,who would have thought it,i can,t say what happened as i was,nt there,but stevie a bear apparently was.garlar07

Agree1 Disagree0

Nah mate calm down , I wasn't having a go at your post , an I wasn't been sarcastic man, if there was more abuse fair do , Lennon would appear to be lying , I was getting more at refs because I think THEY get away to easily,
PaulRFC

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe he is being reported for not swearing and thus letting the ref down,garlar07

Agree2 Disagree0

Bigoted hatred??

This is a shocking statement to make. I like many fellow Rangers fans DISLIKE Lennon for footballing reasons and his attitude. Nothing to do with religion at all, but guys like you come on here and because we discuss a matter involving your manager you drag us back years with this bigotry s##te!! Get a grip pal, the majority of fans on both sides of the Old Firm want to flush out bigotry but with an attitude like yours i wonder if we will ever achieve this.

J1985

Agree4 Disagree1

29 Mar 2012 10:40:23
Mr Bain said he was prepared to return this sum, minus legal expenses, to Rangers' administrators and stressed his legal action had been aimed at Craig Whyte and not the club.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Well done Martin Bain.
Ed- Do you think is this a sign of better things to come? I'd imagine MB has looked into the possibility of Whyte getting his mitts on RFC's money. In light of the fact that money was frozen due to M.Bain's case. Do you think this says anything about Whyte's position being weaker,or has MB just done us a favour?
What your thoughts Ed? - Stevie-A-Bear {Ed001's Note - hard to say with any certainty, he might just have realised he wasn't going to win the case. But it does seem that he just realised that he could, potentially, be the cause of the club folding. I don't think he fancied that thought.}

Agree1 Disagree2

Do you really want this guy back?

Agree3 Disagree2

Never posted anything about wanting him back mate. Just thinking out loud about where this leaves us. Ed0001 made a comment and that's all i was looking for, peoples thoughts. Stevie-A-Bear

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 10:26:51
Come on lads……………..

We need to get a new owner on board, I for one don’t really give a rats a**e about Europe 2012 - 13
Ed.. what clout-say dose Mr McNasty Whyte have! Dose he have the final say, I wouldn’t have thought he would have any legal claim, some one needs to be taking this bandit to task. {Ed001's Note - he has 85% of the shares, he will, at the very least, have a vote, but it depends on the make up of the board now. The administrators have limited powers to force through a sale, that was why they attempted to prove Whyte was not the legal owner, as they would then have been able to force through a sale. Whyte still has a lot of say in Rangers' future.}

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Ed why was whyte allowed to borrow from ticketus before he had control of rangers? If any of us wanted to secure a loan against a house that we were close to buying but didn't actually own it couldn't happen. am i missing something here??
J1985 {Ed001's Note - the question is whether he did borrow it from them prior to taking control, or if he had made an agreement to loan money after he took control. Both parties say it was the latter.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Worth taking a glance at Liverpool where the controlling shareholders could not prevent a sale of their club. I would say Whyte's position is weaker than teirs was. {Ed001's Note - that was down to the make up of the board, there were 5 executive members with voting rights, so the shareholders were simply outvoted.}

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 10:04:54
Starting to get scunnered with the 10 renegade clubs in the SPL trying to dictate terms with the Old Firm.

Just a a user stated in another paragraph, the Old Firm get 32% of the TV money that is 16% each.
On the back of that they generate 85% of the money for the TV deals, which is 42.5% each.

Looking at these figures, it makes me sick an appalled that these renegade clubs are trying to flees the Old Firm for more money. They are getting nearly 300% more than what they are due anyway!

I will tell them now, especially Mr Petrie, Get you bloody acts together and generate money yourselves. If you can't do this give your club to someone who CAN!

Believable5 Unbelievable1

The reverse is also true. The Old Firm need teams to play, and they can name their price unless R&C can find another league to play in. It's unfortunate for Scottish football that much of the money, support and success is focused on two teams who are really in a league of their own. Maybe therein lies the solution.

Agree0 Disagree0

An interesting comment i saw in the evening news regarding this is that if the 10 resigned to form an SPL2 an option open to the old firm would be to invite 10 teams from the SFL to take their place. Surely teams in the current first division would jump at this and it could all spectacularly backfire on the "rebel" 10

Agree1 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 09:00:28
Can anyone confirm if tickets for the legends game are available right up until kick off?

Believable4 Unbelievable0

29 Mar 2012 08:26:44
Looks like craigy boy is making his move, largest shareholder and will be tough to oust. He has scuppered the blue knights deal and I honestly feel he will expect a substantial buyout or liquidate us.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

Wat really annoys me is that CW only put £1 in. He then ran us into the ground. Surely this can be challenged in court? It seems unjust if he gets away with it. Someone please give him his £1 and send him away. Hes more than likely syphoned off millions anyway. CheltBlue

Agree4 Disagree1

To be honest Chelt blue I feel if this has been a well rehearsed play and the large cast giving a performance worthy of a tony. (theatres equivalent of an Oscar for those that don't know) Gut feeling is BTC has been relayed pre public announcement.

Agree1 Disagree0

Whyte certainly shoulders some of the blame but what about SDM?

Agree1 Disagree0

In the end SDM was snookered by the bank - he had to repay his debts.

Meantime, yes, Whyte clearly structured the deal so that he couldn't lose. No more than £1 anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 08:10:43
No matter what happens to us, the scottish game needs to change. I have a couple of friends that are Dundee Utd fans, and they cant be bothered with the league other than getting top 6. Our league is very poor very very poor. I would so much rather start a season with 5-6 teams gunning for 1st place rather than sitting back sayin will it be us or celtic. I think fans will start supporting english teams soon. Whats the point in a league where your team has almost nothing to play for. Fair enough there are say 6 big teams in england, but the so called smaller teams still have some amazing players in them and play stunning football. what do the small teams up here have? what do we have for that matter. I love my team but our league is going down hill fast we need a change. And to all those people that think the league will die without us. dont talk rubbish. its already dead. It would just become harder to fix. Who is going to watch a league where one team win every year?
Don

Believable5 Unbelievable0

Think your too late about young folk supporting english teams - - my son plays regularly with approx 15 -20 regulars and they all wear man u, liv, arsenal, chelsea tops
I have often offered to take him to Ibrox as his mother and i are season ticket holders. the general consensus amongst his mates is that scottish football is crap & he wouldn't waste his time
but then again he comes from a generation, where playing for trophies was frowned upon and everybody had to have a fully certified SFA coach to run under 10's upwards - that worked!!

Agree0 Disagree0

And how is the Scottish league different from any other league in Europe
you could probaly name right now at least 16 teams (at least) from around Europe who will be in NEXT years Champions League - Teams in England are quite happy to finish top 4 = big pay day & its the same in Spain Italy Germany etc

Agree2 Disagree0

Agree. The OF has no choice but stay in Scotland (although I would like to see them in England!) and they will have to agree a more equitable sharing of the spoils. If they don't agree then the other ten should resign as they threatened to do several years ago. The OF then made threatening noises about leaving Scotland so the other ten chickened out. Now, however the OF have nowhere to run so I hope they realise this and play fair.

Rangers will go into liquidation anyway so the problem will resolve itself!

Agree2 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 07:36:25
tax case verdict is taken so long
we need to know now to help to
move this institution forward

Believable6 Unbelievable1

29 Mar 2012 03:45:11
Andy Geggan at ayr utd to rangers this summer great player could be brilliant at ibrox the guys a die hard rangers fan come on ally get this guy signed up or even looked at least

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Doh, can't sign anyone whilst in Admin!

Agree1 Disagree0

Once out of admin

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Mar 2012 02:36:28
if rangers are still in administration by 31st march they will be (ineligible), NOT be able to play in europe in season 12/13

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Really !!!!

Agree3 Disagree0

We know.... months ago.... CheltBlue

Agree3 Disagree0

No way. Really? Surely they can't do that. That's an absolute disgrace if we are not allowed to play in Europe, why hasn't someone told us this before instrad of leaving it till two days before the deadline!!

Agree3 Disagree0

I am expecting a lot of European friendlies to be arranged :)

Agree2 Disagree1

Really?..... Quick someone alert the administrators i dont think they are aware of this.

Mr Blonde

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent