Rangers Banter Archive July 02 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


02 Jul 2012 21:54:24
Hi Ed and posters.I have a few points to say so let me know what you guys think.

Firstly that some of the fans have been getting on the players backs for wanting to leave. I dont blame most of them for leaving however. Most of them played well and gave everything while with us and when they signed for rangers they signed not just for the money but also to play in the spl, play in old firm games and also maybe in europe. So the fact that they are now being forced to play in the 3rd division on a lesser wage, I dont blame them for walking away. Some of them Im glad to see go like Whittaker as he was one of the highest paid and I honestly dont know why. If my boss said I was having to take a 75% wage cut and I knew someone else was willing to hire me, would I stay?! I dont think so.

My second point is that some of the fans have been saying how guys like Lee McCuluch are Rangers men because they are staying. I agree that Lee bleeds Rangers but the only reason that some of the players are staying is the fact that no other team really wants them and not the fact that they are being loyal.
My last point is that I feel that we need to get behind Charles Green. Fans are having a go at him and asking him to sell up, but I feel that we should just be glad that he is willing to put his own money into our club and is trying his best to sort us out. I feel if we dont all get behind him as long as he is doing things right, then we will destroy ourselves from the inside.

Just a few points guys, let me know what your thoughts are. Tully

Believable9 Unbelievable6

This is the most sence I've read on here for months.Great post

Agree3 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 21:52:31
Can I go back a bit here. For an EBT
to be illegal it would have to involve
a third party. Now I am sure that the
EBT was paid directly into each players
bank account and not a third party. Therefore
the scheme was legal .
Now with all the so called people of
sporting integrity in our country are
then proven wrong will they then stand up and
up and appoligies to Rangers .

Believable11 Unbelievable13

The third party was the offshore company who administered the trust,they have not been exactly diligent in their paperwork it seems.

Agree6 Disagree2

Guess the 3 judges at the FTT have been wasting their time for months then, and HMRC and Rangers spending thousands on legal fees was a complete waste of time and money.

They should have brought you in with your wonderful insite and this would have been over months ago.

Mac2.

Agree10 Disagree3

You had better run off to Edinburgh and the high court to make them aware of that point of law. I fear a grave injustice is about to happen when they shortly declare Rangers guilty.

Agree2 Disagree2

I'm no expert OP, but I don't think you are either. If it was that simple do you really think that HMRC would have spent all the money they have on this case?
Al

Agree3 Disagree1

FFS. It's not even worth trying to explain how off the mark you are with this thought process.

There a monkeys at Blairdrummond who understand WHY the EBT's were illegal due to the SIDE CONTRACTS that went with them.

JEEEEEEEZZZZOOOOOO!

Agree4 Disagree4

The ebt problem with regard to ineligible players is this. The sole purpose of an ebt is to avoid tax. This means the payment has to be non- contractual otherwise it is taxable and therefore pointless. If a player registered with an sfa member club is in receipt of a non-contractual payment he is ineligible to play. So no apologies.

Agree3 Disagree1

EBT's pre 12/10 may or may not be deemed as Tax Avoidance.

As far as I can make out out HMRC's case is that earmarked tax free payments were made to players etc disguised as loans. The so called loans were neither repayable i.e. no loan agreements nor were they secured.

Look up Aberdeen Asset Managers v HMRC. Appears to be very similar. HMRC won the case. Aberdeeen appealed. HMRC won the first court of appeal. I think Aberdeen threw in the towel and settled.

Also I believe Chelsea Football Club settled with HMRC, regarding their use of EBT's.

If in the case of Rangers they stated to beneficiaries that payments were tax paid and no tax payable, then that's more sinister- could be tax fraud. That's criminal and may also implicate Ranger's auditors.

Agree0 Disagree0

@2 the three judges are obviously as good as an sfa panel

Agree0 Disagree1

Just out of curiosity pal, can you explain why Graeme Souness recieved an EBT while not employed by Rangers?

And since you're such an expert can you explain how legal that was?

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 21:42:59
http://blogs.dailyrecord.co.uk/jimtraynor/2012/07/if-spl-sfl-kick-gers-out-of-fo.html

don't normaly agree with jim traynor but good article

Believable9 Unbelievable12

Guys a complete kn*b, a gutter scum journalist, doing his best to rattle up support for sevco 5 088. , but it's doing opposite, making more dislike sevco, more he writes, the bigger the hole

Ska bhoy

Agree2 Disagree3

Yes only because its pro rangers /newco
no other reason.

Agree4 Disagree0

Is SDM still vetting his work. And does he get brown envelopes?

Agree5 Disagree1

@2 there was me thinking the article was a plea to save scottish football as well, before it delivers a killer blow to itself

JG

Agree0 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 20:10:02
So Green is going after the Players who left. In his statement he mentions D&P

"These players had already arranged through Duff and Phelps huge reductions in their actual values against the market values and for them to exploit what they see as a loophole and to try to deprive this club of the cash is morally wrong"
What they see as a loophole? It is either a loophole or not,  its that simple. If they are using the negotiated agreement that D&P put together when they arranged their Pay cuts then Green has no Grounds to pursue.  I recon he should look at D&P to recoup the money lost as it seems they have done everybody like kippers. 

Believable3 Unbelievable3

Green:"To deprive this club of the cash is morally wrong". What club Charlie? If it is rangers the cash will go to the creditors pot for liquidation.And it cannot be Sevco as the players have nothing to do with them. Morally wrong? Are you having a laugh?

Agree9 Disagree4

Its the moral bit i had to laugh at... From a guy who put a package together to offer creditors 9pence in the pound!! Astonishing!

Agree9 Disagree4

Charlie, you're club isn't the old club the players were contracted to. Under British employment law they don't need to sign new contracts with you.
Morally doesn't count in court it's points of law that counts. Blow away season ticket money on QCs if u like.

Agree8 Disagree0

@2
Why?
CG had no moral obligation to do anything. He put an offer in for the assets which was accepted.

Agree0 Disagree2

To those of this forum who are gainfully employed, take a trip into you HR department and ask to see a hard copy on online version of Croner.

Croner are specialists in Human Resources and Employment Law, who produce manuals and training to most employers on what they can and cannot do with employees.

There is a specific section on TUPE and if you were to call them up, they would confirm that there is no timelimit on when you need to let a TUPE employer know you are not going to transfer over when you are bought over.

The 24 hour thing is nonsense, either he's getting bad advice (if he actually takes any) or he is trying to BS fans.

If however they accepted wages beyond the official transfer date, they might be considered to have accepted the transfer of contract by default. BUT, they would be very stupid if they had accepted it.

No one in power who has passed through that doorway in the past 25 years has ever had the fans interests at heart, only their bank accounts.

TBK (Bent as a hairpin, these were the guys who said FA when DM was at it)

WHYTE (A quick check on companies house showed he bought and liquidated dozens of companies as a hobby. This was a FREE Webcheck that anyone could have done, so when DM says he was duped, he is talking utter p!sh)

The only way Rangers will get any credibility back at all is if they start from scratch.

Bomber Broon GTF
Walter GTF
Green GTF
Ally (yes Ally) has been sucked in like a hamster up a Dyson. He would skin a turd for a tenner and company BMM) G hime tae F too!

Third Division GTF

Club together,don't waste any money on Green. Buy a third division club for a few mill. Green would eat yer hand off for someone to buy Ibrox in two to three years to get if off his hands.

JOB DONE

Agree0 Disagree2

02 Jul 2012 20:07:51
everybody talks about greedy rangers cheating rangers . the SFA, were happy to take evil rangers money for years , as were the SPL ,where do all you haters think money comes from? must just be the innocent clubs , GIVE ME A BREAK ,money talks and always will ,any club in the SPL could be looked into tomorrow and be found guilty of the same thing and you all know it , FAULTY TURNSTYLES ,? do you really think toilet rolls cost hundreds of thousands a year? maybe it was trophy polish , its about time you idiots took a good look at yourselves , coz you could be next . i am a rangers fan and i never stole from anyone. thank you and goodnight...

Believable11 Unbelievable10

You also must be a nutcase.How do you know how much clubs spend on loo roll and trophy polish? Get an early night i think you need it.

Agree7 Disagree6

Sorry have I missed something? I thought the money was stolen from not paying the tax that was due. {Ed039's Note - Stolen is not the right word to use)

Agree5 Disagree4

There's 276 creditors who think their money was stolen.

Agree2 Disagree1

Hi Ed taking money out of some ones pay packet for PAYE and using it for something else is pretty close to theft in my book

Agree2 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 20:00:06
John brown is asking once again for green to show deeds to ibrox,Murray park, Albion car park, but at the protest he said Murray sold Albion car park to the co-operative and angers rented it back so what's he on about {Ed039's Note - Eh?)

Believable5 Unbelievable0

He did say that.I found it strange the Albion was being leased back and no one knew about it.

Agree4 Disagree2

He's looking for proof of ownership.
If it has been sold off and rented back then there will be a lease agreement,
rather than a certificate of ownership.
Can't understand why people are questioning JB on this one.
What if the Albion has been sold off,and rented back,who sold it, how much did they get, and where did the money go?

Bomber may not be the most eloquent of speakers,but at least he's trying to find out how legit Mr Green is. Surely this is a good thing?
P.O.B.

Agree3 Disagree0

In D&Ps financial report to creditors it lists the Albion as on a long lease from its real owners. The value of that lease to Rangers was estimated by D&P to be around £1.8m

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 19:46:18
Charles Green claims Rangers manager Ally McCoist will be given funds to strengthen this summer and says those who have left the club were driven by money.

As chief executive of the newco at Ibrox, Green is attempting to bring stability back to the Old Firm giants.

He has, however, seen a number of players refuse to transfer their contracts to the newco and supporters contest the arrival of his consortium in Glasgow.

Green intends to see the job out, though, and is adamant that Gers boss McCoist will be backed in the transfer market.

Believable5 Unbelievable7

02 Jul 2012 19:38:09
I really dont know what the big song and dance about is with the SPL, i means it obv they dont want us in DIV 3 because they need us and cant have us gone for more than a year, but they dont want it to be seen this way, as for the SFL clubs i can understand there 'integrity' argument but they are NEVER going to get an oppurtunity to make this much revenue in a season if we play in one of the SFL leagues, its all getting drawn out needlesslery

DIV 3 just get it decided so we can get moving on with pre-season, relegate aberdeen so they can moan about integrity then lets move on we'll see the SPL in three years!!

Believable8 Unbelievable3

02 Jul 2012 19:36:40
see tbh? i think we should just take our punishment and go down to the 3rd div, then 3 year time we will have a good experienced young squad that will wont a shot at europe and we might even have some money by then to build on the team:)? Watp

Believable8 Unbelievable6

Mate, i posted something very similar a few days ago. Bring it on. Thats what i say. Rtid.

Agree2 Disagree5

Is there no end to your arrogance?Ever heard of one step at a time?Let's get into a division(any division)and see how we do.Talk about Europe is stupid---we all need dreams but that's a step too far at the moment.

Agree6 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 18:09:31
Al,right lads,I,m an evertonian and although yhere has,nt been nothihg official from our club rumours that are circulating is that naismith failed his medical on saturday! just thought I,d let you kow! and a heart felt good luck for the future!...... scousejohn {Ed039's Note - Naismith has only just come back from a serious knee injury again so I would be surprised if he passes any medical anywhere)

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Radio clyde stated this morning that he passed a medical at weekend and was discussing terms on a contract

Agree1 Disagree2

02 Jul 2012 18:04:21
malcolm murray refuses to meet brown after agreeing to meet him,maybe they something to hide ?

Believable1 Unbelievable2

Why should the chairman of Rangers be ordered to produce documents to a loud mouth former low level employee? If he had done it, he would've been the weakest chairman ever at Ibrox. Losing all respect.

Agree4 Disagree2

02 Jul 2012 17:48:31
I see John Brown has been turned down an audience with Mr Murray.

If Murray provides the paperwork with the deeds, what will Brown then do?

Also why would Murray not be asking brown, if you are interested in a buyout then where are your long term plans and financing?

P.S John please don't have it written on the back of a fag packet.....

Believable5 Unbelievable2

@ "If Murray provides the paperwork with the deeds, what will Brown then do?"

More than likely inform the fans that everything is above board and will back off to let Green get on with saving the club.
The fans will back him if he can prove he owns them,and not CW.
P.O.B.

Agree1 Disagree3

02 Jul 2012 17:26:20
I doubt Charles Green showed John Brown the title deeds to MP and Ibrox, so guess Brown has to come good with his threat to reveal what was said or else Brown is just all gas.

Believable19 Unbelievable1

Has brown not said he will release a statement within 24/48 hours

hail hail

Marco1888 {Ed039's Note - When his hangover subsides)

Agree2 Disagree0

And if Green did show the title deeds then Ibrox has the weakest owner ever to step over the threshold. Who is brown, but a disgruntled former employee at a very low level.

Agree5 Disagree0

Drunks cannot keep dignity or secrets. He knows nowt!

Agree4 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 17:24:45
John Brown seems to have gone quiet since the demo. I'm struggling to believe that the twitter account @johnbomberbrown is real. Anyone know for sure?

Believable9 Unbelievable1

02 Jul 2012 17:24:40
RANGERS newco could be facing potential cash flow problems after one of Scotland's biggest banks refused to back financing plans.

Reports claimed that the Royal Bank of Scotland refused to underwrite a £2.6million overdraft which would have paid out season ticket money to new owner Charles Green's Sevco before direct debits were recouped from fans. evening times

Believable13 Unbelievable1

He should try Lloyds, they're always good for a loan. Or what about Ticketus. If he's really stuck theirs this guy soon ma pub .....

Shug

Agree3 Disagree0

There will be an administration on Thursday.

The money's in the land. {Ed039's Note - What are you talking about?)

Agree4 Disagree0

This cannot be. Green has twenty million pounds of investments from 20 investors begging him to take their money. He told that himself

Agree3 Disagree0

Green for a wee bed in ward 1 wishaw, psych ward, guys a Walter Mitty

Ska bhoy

Agree0 Disagree0

Is that two war chests of £10m each? Or one war chest of £20m?

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 17:09:22
Ed hope you can help.... It's about the history thing. I know UEFA need a new club to do 3 years, incorporated with accounts, before being recognized for European competitions. I also know that insolvency law prohibits Newcos from trading on the logos, styles, trading names, traditions and history of oldcos.
This points to the history being stopped with old Rangers incorporated 1899. That's why Wimbledon traded under the new club name MKDons.
But also Clubs apply for football licenses, not businesses or companies. So newco are applying for transfer of the oldco license. Surely if it was the same club we would have the same spl license? Which is grated to football clubs not companies. Also we have to apply for a new SFA license as a new club so guess that means were a brand new club without the old club history. As SFA grant licenses to clubs not companies. {Ed039's Note - I don't believe the history transfers to the newco)

Believable12 Unbelievable5

Heard within the last hour of news about to break that rangers have been falsifying
accounts for a number of years .how true
this is im not sure but if it is fear the worst.anyone else heard anything {Ed039's Note - No, accounts had been signed off and presented at AGM for years, if these have been falisfied then someone is going to jail)

Agree6 Disagree0

Agreed Ed its time for the fans to take off their blue coloured spectacles and face the truth 54 titles and no more If I was a Ger I would want to forget the recent history anyways Its been a nightmare {Ed039's Note - History is history, it will never go away but its the future thats important now, a new history where the attrocities of the oldco from the last decade are never repeated, but I dont even think the future looks bright)

Agree6 Disagree0

Ed 039 is correct the history can't follow on to newco just like all the debt! {Ed039's Note - Couldnty resist a dig then? Why dont people leave names so we can see how much consistent "sense" people talk and how many times they say the same thing over and over and over ............)

Agree3 Disagree0

As a roaming browser I find it strange the preoccupation with the past when the big question would appear to be the ? future.

Agree2 Disagree2

If it was the same football club it would have the same footballing licenses.
Charles Green's Club is brand new, it doesn't have any footballing licenses, it doesn't have a badge, it doesn't have a league to play in. It does have some players, they have never played a competitive match as a team yet and Green does own a stadium. That's it.... The truth.

Agree5 Disagree1

Sadly the newco has no history till they win something and play a game the old co record is there in the books and memory of the fans this will not continue to the newco sadly ed was spot on

Agree1 Disagree0

The reason for the licence application is simple! Rangers plc owned Rangers FC who in turn held the licence given by SFA. When Rangers FC and all its assets transferred over to the new owners, the licence reverted back to the SFA as they own it officially! Rangers FC therefor have to reapply for the licence! Same club, same stadium, same fans and same haters! History of club continues so behave yourselves and stop wishing us dead! We Bears decide when Rangers is gone....not other teams supporters!

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 16:53:46
The high jacking of every Internet site continues by the rangers haters they wil stop at nothing .the amount of hate I have read in nearly every newspaper makes me quite sick .they all talk of integrity these people have none .we all know who is responsible for the mess at our club and they should be taken to task not the fans and most of all the people who earn a living from the club.

Believable16 Unbelievable13

Supporters of other clubs wanting Rangers to go to Div 3 is not hatred. It is supporters seeking the correct outcome to the current situation.

Mac2.

Agree13 Disagree15

The fans are inextricably linked with the club. It is impossible to punish or impose sanctions on Sevco without affecting the fans. No one has ever suggested that the fans are responsible for the mess that "Rangers" are in.
Liah Smit

Agree7 Disagree7

Division 3 would be okay but it seems to me that some fans want us obliterated and we are supposed to just accept this?

Agree3 Disagree1

Why should a new owner be liable for the old one's misdemeanours?
P.O.B.

Agree5 Disagree0

To stop people like craig whyte performing the Good old switcheroo.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 15:57:04
John Brown accuses Ibrox Chairman of pulling out of a planned meeting to show who owns Rangers assets.

Source: Radio Clyde

Believable5 Unbelievable4

Apparently it was cancelled as Bomber's supply of buckie hadn't arrived.

Mac2.

Agree12 Disagree3

Brown seems to think HE has the right to make demands on Green, WHY?

Agree10 Disagree2

Your showing yourself up as a brainless clown with that remark

Agree1 Disagree12

02 Jul 2012 15:45:30
Some false accounting allegations about to emerge.
Don't think this can make matters any worse than they already are, mind you.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Criminal charges for those involved if true resulting in custodial sentances.

Mac2.

Agree11 Disagree1

Well given that false accounting carries a jail sentence it could make things a lot worse than they are at present for some people.

Agree8 Disagree0

Great news at last!
DMurray, MIH and their accountants deserve all that's coming to them.
P.O.B.

Agree3 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 15:42:54
Do Celtic fans always post about rangers on here because they know they can't attract any decent players in the transfer market? At least when rangers had the money they could attract gazza etc. {Ed039's Note - The problem is Rangers never had the money,SDM borrowed from the bank which built up to the financial mess that was Rangers FC plc, what a silly post)

Believable10 Unbelievable15

Not agreeing with post ed but there cant be many clubs who have signed players without financial help from a bank we were not the only ones so there is not many clubs out there that live within there means {Ed039's Note - Of course they do, every club has been at it, its just the "when Rangers had the money" bit, if we had the money we wouldnt be in the position we find ourselves in)

Agree2 Disagree1

Well said ed sure you got big name players but at least celtic have paid for the players that they have and declared the contracts and payments , oh and they paid taxes . what part of cheating dont you understand {Ed039's Note - Not paying taxes isnt cheating on a football pitch, its morally and financially wrong and I think there should be more punishments set up through the courts for institutions that practice this way, it just seems to me that there are good and decent Rangers fans who have bought all the merchandise, live their lives responsibly but are being hit with taunts from other fans of "tax dodgers" which gets on my nerves. I will always tell it as it us but some of the stick recently towards some fans has been over the top)

Agree4 Disagree0

Don't continue blaming everyone else it gets you nowhere! {Ed039's Note - Who was blaming someone else? Please point out the bit where that is said?)

Agree1 Disagree0

Was rangers debt not £18 million pounds when Murray sold rangers? Surely an affordable debt for a club like rangers {Ed039's Note - Rangers debt to Lloyds Bank was £18 million, there was plenty of debt to other creditors)

Agree0 Disagree1

The reason Celtic can live within their means as you say, is because of Desmond, wait till he pulls out.

Agree1 Disagree3

02 Jul 2012 15:23:40
Hearing some crazy figures about as many as 50 Scottish clubs threatened with administration. SFL 3 could be a very busy place!

Believable1 Unbelievable6

Would that be 50 out of the 42 clubs.

That is crazy.

Mac2. {Ed039's Note - Lol, maybe junior clubs included in this figure)

Agree7 Disagree0

Nobody can threaten a club with administration. This is just nonsense.
The clubs themselves are responsible of whether they enter administration, not the SFA/SPL/SFL.
So all this talk of "threatening " clubs with administration is fabrication!

TTG

Agree1 Disagree0

Ive heard that there are 3 school teams in the 50 lol

Agree2 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 14:53:19
Team For Next Season?

Gk-Alexander
Rb-Broadfoot
Cb-Perry
Cb-Hegarty
Lb-Wallace
Rm-New Player? Free Agent
Cm-Jig
Cm-bedoya
Lm-Kerkar
St-New Player? Free Agent
St-New Player? Free Agent

Believable6 Unbelievable6

Whos the 3 players with the same name . where are they from

Agree2 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 15:55:29
I like how Celtic fans come on here claiming Rangers cheated their way to the title in a vein attempt to justify their paranoia over the last few decades. Rangers still won on the park; do you really think EBT's spurned them on to win games; I don't think so. Rangers have paid ridiculous wages to numerous foreign has beens and it didn't improve their performance. Get it right; the club intentionally evaded tax they didn't cheat on the field. Referring to them as cheats just doesn't hold water.

I can't believe the authorities have wasted so much time; Rangers should go to the 3rd Division like any other club would. As for them trying to change the setup it is a clear manouvre to safeguard other clubs; but I'm sure in the end most clubs will find a way of managing their finances without Rangers gate money etc. And let's be honest there are a lot of fans out there who won't renew their season tickets if playing in a lower division; however I would be delighted if the blues fans proved me wrong!

Believable13 Unbelievable8

Oh yes all the false audits rangers put into sfa over the years is not cheating wake up and start accepting your club was cheating {Ed039's Note - Where is the false audits?)

Agree8 Disagree1

Do you really think that EBTS spurred them on to win games?NO.....do you really think that EBTS spurred them on to actually sign for Rangers?Oh yes.....could rangers actually afford these players wages without using EBTS?No a chance.

Agree11 Disagree3

Of course it makes a diff the players were getting paid with ebts and had duel contracts witch breaks sfa and uafa rules so players were not eligible 2 play so wake up your club was cheating simples

Agree10 Disagree4

Every club gets into debt buying players borrowing money including top english clubs but they have more money in their game sdm borrowed and got out quick ..its the ebts that we need to answer for if proven

Agree0 Disagree0

Dealing outwith the rules and beyond our means to an extent that the arse fell out of our club surely gave us an unfair advantage so lets be honest , we wont lose our titles but they have got a point

Agree2 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 14:44:42
Ed be honest do you think we will be playing football next season? Also will we be playing in a new strip

DAN {Ed039's Note - Don't know about the strip, but until something concrete is announced then I am not convinced about anything)

Believable10 Unbelievable1

I believe its a requirement not to use the old strip and logo's etc but I don't know if the strips that they will wear will be new or they will be borrowed from somewhere or other.

Agree2 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 13:35:47
bears, reading your page , still the same old , kicking us when we are down, let them rot without us, let them all go bust.. old rangers 1872 got one punishment 10 point deduction for going into admin, and the big one , history frozen for being liquidated, further punishment { for 1872} could be stipping of trophies won. now forget miller, ng, the blue knights or whoever , lets just talk about mr. mccoll because he is a man of real wealth, a billionaire. he could have saved you , pay all the debt and stay as you were. or at least put a sensible amount into the cva pot. even if the total debt was as reported by duff and duffer £135m he would have been paying what it is valued at ie ibrox,murray park, albion, and the player values.. but he didn't want to do that, he waited til mr. greene did all the dirty work and now wants you on the cheap.. newco have not been punished in any way and nor can they be , they have done nothing wrong. but no other newco has ever started anywhere other than the third division. do any of you honestly think it would be fair to allow newco { debt free} with a huge investment from mr. mccoll or even your good selves via a share issue , to play against teams that are servicing debts , and to celtic thats £2m a year for the next four years .. . i read you guys posts quite a lot and i''''''d say that the majority want to start in the third, and rightly so. but get it into your heads , that is not a punishment , it is simply the rules .shamrock

Believable11 Unbelievable4

Dont you understand they are not punishments they are results of your own actions they are rules that are there to try to keep clubs in line with the law

Agree2 Disagree0

Well thanks for enlightening us all to what we were already aware of Shamrock!
Speaking for myself i don't need to........ " get it into my head". There are no rules regarding this unprecedented scenario,so therefore logic dictates there can be no punishment. Outwith the penalties that have already been meted out.
So what is the point of your post,and why are you appealing for an argument against something that is all too bloody obvious?
Technically there is no difference between a shamrock and a clover,although a popular misconception is that the clover has four leaves.
You appear to have a leaf missing as well.
P.O.B.

Agree2 Disagree3

No, I don't think it would be fair at all and yes, I think we should start over in Div 3. Mind you , if what HK is reporting is correct, we could very easily be joined by another 20 clubs. Question for you, that 2mil a year your talking about, is that not giving you an unfair advantage over the other clubs in the SPL who aren't in a position to carry such a dept ? I'm joking of course but it will be interesting to see what rules are put in place in the name of sporting integrity. If they are as serious as they make out, would it not make sense to create a dept ceiling for every club in order to allow smaller clubs to be and remain compeditive . The 2 mil you mention that Celtic service may not fit the guidlines created. Now , I'm sensible enough to know that Celtic at present, could certainly dominate Scottish fitba by operating with no dept at all but what about Europe ? IMHO, the question Celtic supporters have to ask themselves is if any, new, fairer rules to deal with dept actually do come to pass....will you embrace them and accept the fact that Europe will be all about qualifying rounds from now till the cows come home ??

Agree1 Disagree3

To be fair the other clubs demand fairness i dont think they are getting at the rangers fans its the way our club was run

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jun 2012 21:15:32
once again we the fans seem to be left in the dark. ex players are falling over themselves to support bombers plan(and before any morons jump in i support bombers plan too). i have to ask has bomber told the ex players what this statement green is alleged to have made to him a week past friday. if this is the case then i am disgusted once again at how we fans are told nothing of whats going on. i dont buy this BS that bomber will use the statement as a bargaining tool against green to purchase the club. if this guy has said something that is detrimental to the future of the club then we are entitled to know what was said, so come on bomber let us know what was said it is your duty to do so. (you got any info on this ED?).

Believable2 Unbelievable2

02 Jul 2012 13:13:18
Posted by Ron Scott in "The Sunday Post".....

"The way the Scottish football authorities have allowed the Rangers scenario to unravel is nothing short of disgraceful.

The whole sorry episode should have been nipped in the bud.

Instead we're now in the situation where it's not just the survival of Rangers that's at stake, but the Scottish game itself.

As the fans and clubs become hysterical about how the Light Blues should be punished, it's worth remembering the Ibrox club has done nothing unlawful.

Employment Benefit Trusts are legal. That's why HMRC wants to close this particular loophole.
Informed sources suggest, at worst, Rangers will receive fine, and there appears no danger of having to pay back-tax on the system Sir David Murray implemented.

The SFA then decided to impose severe sanctions on Rangers after awakening to the fact that Craig Whyte was not a fit and proper person to own the club.

Yet the independent Ibrox board set up to look into Whyte while he was still negotiating with Murray decided themselves that [he] wasn't fit and proper to own the club.
They told the SFA that at least fifteen months ago, but the powers-that-be decided in their wisdom to take no action at that time.

Now the situation is like a runaway train full of explosives that's about to be derailed and blow up the whole of Scottish football.

Let's face the obvious here. Not even Celtic will be able to sustain their present level for long without Rangers.
So if they end up having to make cuts, how is the rest of Scottish football going to survive?

There are already whispers that other SPL clubs will be forced into administration.
There is even talk of part-time football at the highest level, never mind the First Division.

It's all very well to bleat on about sporting integrity. But why risk the entire future of Scottish football especially when the facts clearly show Rangers have done nothing wrong !
At the end of the day, the main villan of the piece remains Whyte, with Murray a close second.

It's totally wrong to run the risk of losing Rangers altogether and sending down the entire game with them.
It is especially wrong when the facts show there is absolutely no need for the authoeities to treat Rangers the way they appear hell-bent on doing."

Just want to see what people on here think of what he has to say.

Believable5 Unbelievable4

The problem with this, is he,as usual with the Scottish press,is working to a different agenda than the fans.He is correct in one thing though,the whole sorry episode should have been nipped in the bud.The rangers scenario,as he puts it,is they are being liquidated.As such they should lose their SPL place and apply to the SFL for a league position in the third division.No one is hysterical about punishing rangers,you cant as they wont exist in a few weeks,and sevco cant be punished as they have done nothing wrong.As for losing rangers altogether,too late,it has already happened.Rangers as we knew them will be defunct in a couple of weeks,It,s time these reporters understood this instead of fuelling the fires of denial.

Agree5 Disagree3

Nonsense. Drama queen stuff.
I'll informed guff.
A better read was the article in the Scotsman about shoehorning Rangers into SFL1.

Agree2 Disagree1

This was not from The Sunday Post - there are no 'michty me's', a complete absenced of 'crivvens' and I failed to spot either a 'jings' or a 'help ma boab'. Please only post real Sunday Post stories Ed. {Ed039's Note - I never have or never will read the Sunday post so I don't know if it's real or not)

Agree2 Disagree0

@1 give us a break You have not read the tim posts on this page for months, continual and repetitive.
'fuelling the fires of denial'. The man is clearly referring to the Rangers brand be it old co or new co. What is the proper name for Celtic? Celtic F.C. or Celtic Football Club Public Limited Company? You dont hear that being sung in many of your songs. You dont see it listed as that in the football coupons along with all the other clubs or see the abbreviation of CFCFCPLC. You dont go to watch your favourite PLC football match you go to support your team, a football team.
The man is clearly refering to the Rangers brand as is by the way the SPL, SFA and SFL hence the reason they appear to be trying to get the newco into a higher placed league for early return to the SPL for numerous reasons. They know the potential for the newco and they want it, may even need it, but they want Rangers back up there.

Agree1 Disagree1

So your the guy that reads the Sunday Post. Thouht about signing Fat Bob for centre half.

Agree1 Disagree0

If its in the Sunday Post then it must be on the nail! A shugglywan.

Agree0 Disagree0

Poster 3 here.......why sign Fat Boab when 'the big house must stay open ' guy is playing for us.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 13:11:46
As the authorities meet this week to decide on the fate of 'Newco' they should perhaps remind themselves of Article 2 of the UEFA Statutes where, in section f it states they should -
ensure that sporting values always prevail over commercial interests.

Believable10 Unbelievable2

And where's the integrity in the champions league? Shoehorn as many teams in from bigger countries and forget about champions of smaller countries. Totally about the money. Another idiot that quotes the rules only when it suits them. SG

Agree2 Disagree1

Maybe that should read. Ensure sport prevails over sporting integrity.

Agree0 Disagree1

Or 'diddy countries with diddy leagues' as poster 1 wil no doubt call it now that his team's no longer in it.

Agree0 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 13:11:18
Former Celtic chairman Brian Quinn has been appointed to the new UEFA group which will decide on whether clubs comply with the governing bodys licensing and financial fair play regulations.


A former deputy governor of the Bank of England, Quinn, 75, was chairman of Celtic from 2000 to 2007. He is to become a member of the Investigatory Chamber of the UEFA Club Financial Control Body (CFCB).

Quinns initial appointment is until June 2015, which means that he would be unlikely to be involved in judging any future application by Rangers to be allowed to return to European football as the clubs liquidation debars them for three years.

Source: Scotsman.
Celtic have had a deputy chairman of the bank of England and latterly Lord John Reid, former government minister of state as chairmen of Celtic. Is that quality of leadership ultimately the difference Rangers never had?

Believable11 Unbelievable2

You are winding us up stating John Reid as some kind of Paragon of virtue, behave.

Agree3 Disagree9

@OP having a laugh, you obviously dont know John Reid.

Agree0 Disagree4

02 Jul 2012 12:26:05
Just seen the first proposal for the SPL and SFL:

Dundee SPL
Airdrie SFL1
Stanraer SFL2
Rangers SFL3

Believable18 Unbelievable9

So it's a trip down the west coast to see a higher level of football then :-(

Agree3 Disagree1

I take it you mean SEVCO to Div 3. Rangers no longer exist. Pay attention !

Agree7 Disagree4

02 Jul 2012 12:02:49
Can I ask all you disgruntled and bitter bears out there, would you be caring about the welfare of Scottish football if this was not happening to you? And were you caring about 1 sided leagues when you were outspending everyone and buying top quality international players? VEGIEBHOY

Believable16 Unbelievable10

The epl wasn't as strong in the 90s, demand for Scottish football is at a all time low and doesn't need 1 sided leagues, plus Celtic are a very average side to the rangers 1 in the 90s.

Agree3 Disagree4

OP Nobody was caring about the welfare of Scottish football until this happened. Your name says it all mate.

Agree3 Disagree3

It's already looking great for the SPL, Jon Daly saying in the paper it will be exciting just to see who is going to get second place! Cant't wait myself!!!!!

Agree2 Disagree0

The MSM have had the pr spin on overdrive that scotland need this newco& how our domestic game will be in turmoil,they all seem to forget it was the defunct club RFC that has caused this turmoil& all small buisnesses who have went bust& large creditors have been brushed off& forgotten about..The season starts on 4th august(for spl teams)& the 11th august for sfl teams,so i hope the sfa,spl,sfa sort this sorry scenario out asap& let the newco entity know where they stand!

Agree1 Disagree0

What ever happened to "No-one likes us, we don't care" ?
Bit embarrasing wandering about with the paper cup out now isn't it ?

Agree7 Disagree2

Yes i do care about scottish football, and did not the rest of scottish football benefit, by selling more tickets to come and see the big name stars coming to their grounds

Agree3 Disagree1

Veggy,

And would you be interested if it was st johnstone?

Agree0 Disagree3

Why don't you come up with something
original instead of something that was said ages ago you narrow minded fool

Agree1 Disagree1

Big difference there though,
1- everybody else would cope without the diddy teams anyway
2- we forced yous all into signing a better quality of player, the likes of di canio, larsson etc etc etc wouldnt have been at your team if it wasnt for us

Agree1 Disagree3

Hypothetical and pointless questions there Vegiebhoy because it is happening to Rangers. If it was not my team I would be disgruntled by any other team creating this mess and causing upset to Scottish football, BUT it is happening to the team I support. Let me ask a quick question, why are you commenting here? I find it very interesting that some Celtic fans are even on here commenting on a Rangers website, however I'm sure it is welcomed banter! To state though there is no point asking what IF scenarios cause this is the situation and it's in real time. And to answer your other question, did I care about "one sided league when you were outspending...etc". Of course I cared that we were getting top quality players in and winning trophies. I thought SDM had the money to fund his project! Forgive me for thinking a multi-millionaire had the money to bankroll these top players. If what you're asking is if I knew SDM's reckless overspending would ultimately lead to my team's downfall, would I be happy to go along with it. Then I ask you, do you really need an answer to that! Even I thought 12m was crazy spending, but I was duped into thinking Rangers had the money. Sorry!!

Agree7 Disagree1

Response to 10. Great post and imho, one that speaks for all true Rangers supporters. None of us would have tolerated cheating had we known

Agree1 Disagree0

Sorry (3). It will also be interesting to see who the first casualty is. Without being as smug as you that's an event which I'm certainly not looking forward to

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 11:18:30
Rangers in crisis: SFL insider reveals 20 clubs could go to the wall if they don't accept newco into their ranks
By Hugh Keevins

RANGERS are unwanted by clubs in the lower leagues.
But unless one of the three divisions gives them a home in time for the start of next season the SFL itself faces the prospect of going bust.
And the survival of as many as 20 clubs is feared to be hanging in the balance.

Nobody believing a word of this mid summer, closed season, space filling manure. Nobody goes to the wall because Rangers not invited into any league. Rumour the source of the drivel was SFL Chairman Donald Findlay. Need anyone say anymore? Desperate times for very desperate, nasty people.

Believable18 Unbelievable10

You do your detective work and as usual everything comes back to Rangers or people previously connected with Rangers.
Too many people jumping on the bandwagon to throw mud at our club. Do you seriously think that the SPL without Rangers is going to be attractive, televised matches between st mirren and Ross county with about three thousand in the ground and less watching on TV.
We deserve punishment but the bloodlust being shown by chairman and supporters is getting out of hand.
Div 3 grounds, will they be able to cope with an increased travelling support, will they need to spend money to upgrade stadia and what about the policing and local infrastructure.
Where does the money come for for those improvements with crowds averaging three hundred normally , get real wake up and smell the coffee Rangers being sent to division 1 or 3 will cause all sorts of issues.
Do you think maybe Keevens or his unnamed source could have a point ?

Agree1 Disagree4

OMG... biggest pile of drivel i've read in my life.
just the same as scottish football would die without rangers. in all honesty, rangers would die without scottish football
frankiebhoy

Agree2 Disagree1

WHY if the now defunct club had not went into administration/liquidation , would 20 sfl clubs still be at risk ? Seems keevins traynor and the media yahoos are just changing the league as " the newco " is told on your bike

Agree2 Disagree1

Funny how all these clubs in lower leagues have managed until now.

Mac2.

Agree6 Disagree1

@2
You obviously never read your own post before hitting the send button.
What is rediculous about the OP's post?
Also do yourself a favour and stop spouting obvious claptrap.
Of course Rangers would be nowhere without the rest of Scottish football,who would they have played against?
P.O.B.

Agree0 Disagree1

Mac2.
You want to have a look at your post again mate?
It's not about the past,it's about the future.
SPL/SFL/SFA all generate and redistribute money throughout the leagues. Where would you say the majority of money generated comes from,by whom,and through what vehicle?
P.O.B.

Agree1 Disagree0

The SFL clubs don't want Rangers? Are these the same clubs that are usually creaming themselves when they draw either one of the Old Firm in the cup? Amazing what whipping up a bit of hatred and spite masked as sporting integrity can achieve! They were all really desperate to get rid of Rangers when they flocked en masse to Hampden the other day in protest! Fail Fail would best describe that gathering!

Agree2 Disagree1

02 Jul 2012 08:56:27
Solution to Old Firm match finances:

Often stated that Scottish Football needs Rangers in the SPL because of the money brought in by Old Firm derbies. Now it looks like Rangers are going to SFL - possibly SFL3 - there is still one way these derbies can happen. Celtic must also go into the SFL!

Believable11 Unbelievable7

Aye Celtic will give champions league for division 3, get real, what planet you from? P.S. I'm a rangers fan worried for the sanity of some fellow fans.

Agree2 Disagree0

No they dont and i for one will not agree to playing them in any sort of make shift cup to accomidate sky...mark.

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jul 2012 08:43:28
looks slightly unlikely that our fellow clubs will vote to transfer the PLC company SPL share over to Ltd therefore our team (Rangers) will play in another division next season. does anyone know the reasoning behind an 8-4 vote and not just a simple majority as is normal in all other walks of life?

JG

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Its called a two thirds majority and is very common in business and politics. Its there to ensure that th integrity of the vote is more likely to be maintained.

Agree1 Disagree0

It used to be a "10-2" vote so Rangers and Celtic couldn't be beaten by the other clubs ganging up on them.
After the last league rules shake up it was decided to make it "8-4" to even things up a bit and sweeten the lot of the smaller clubs.
One point I don't get though, why it's "8-4" when currently there are only 11 clubs in the SPL.

Agree0 Disagree1

So that there is some kind of in-built continuity, avoiding short-termism. Not unusual in constitutional affairs. In a league of 12 teams a simple majority is effectively 7-5 anyway so in fact the difference between the two scenarios is only one team.

Agree0 Disagree0

01 Jul 2012 23:52:05
Why is it the the players are able to use employment law and therefore exercise their right to walk away and sign for another club it's all peachy , and when gers go to court to overturn a unlawful decision in the usage of SPL rules they are castigated for not going through the proper channels

Believable18 Unbelievable10

Because on the first, Rangers are probably wrong. And on the second they are also probably wrong. It's not personal.

Agree4 Disagree0

01 Jul 2012 23:33:13
i really cant see rangers even being ready for the start of the season in whatever league they may be playing in...if any at all,
this is the mother of all f**k ups,
here's an idea,
why doesn't charles green buy stmirren and reform them as "paisley rangers",play at ibrox,no history but let's face it guys,that's the least of our problems the way things stand we may no longer even have a team to support , ,maybe sounds a bit crazy but surely no more crazy than the rumour of buying bury fc,

Believable3 Unbelievable20

That's been mentioned before. So has buying Bury! But that's not going to happen so quickly and you can be sure that by the time the SFA and SPL have finished scratching their heads as to whether that's allowed or not and CG has gone to court again the season will have started.

Agree0 Disagree1

And where is he going to get the money to buy another football club? He can't get a bank account with a reputable company. Claims to have £20 million backing but needs an overdraft of £2.5m just till the season ticket money comes in. He couldn't buy a 9 iron!

Agree3 Disagree0

Emmm....i think he might need money to buy St Mirren.

Agree0 Disagree0

What happens to the st mirren players if newco take them over

Agree0 Disagree0

Easy answer to that one. Mr Green doesn't have a pot to p**s in.
Simples.

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent