Rangers Banter Archive March 03 2013

03 Mar 2013 20:11:32
To me your history has gone because of liquadation. to u its still intact. opinions r allowed. rant over. now serious questions. do u think ally is the man for the job?is charled green just after the money like any buisness man or in it for the passion? Pedro

Why don't go away ang talk about your own team.
trueblue

Do you think Fanta Pants will still be in a job when we get back to SPL or whatever thet will be calling it. His anger management classes seem to have taken a tumble.

No has to go as soon as

The same Neil
Francis Lennon whom shattered Rangers (1872) 15 point lead in their last ever season in the SPL?

I would say McCoist shattered our lead. Lennon has'nt won anything yet that was'nt dropped in his lap. bit like Mancini with Inter. and if you really think any different, well, bully for you.

03 Mar 2013 17:01:40
I'm shocked at people on here asking for Marvin Andrews to come, the guy is part of a team that's conceded 60 goals this season, do people on here know anything about football?

03 Mar 2013 20:02:52
Arsenal maybe ripe for a takeover surely cg has bought they shares back as he said he would

£1. 5bn being quoted for Arsenal so how the hell did Green get Rangers for £5.5m?!

Honestly the next post is going to have McCoist back in the team, most posts about players on here are always ex players is your scouting & youth set up that bad that kris Boyd & Kevin Thomson have been talked about coming back to the rangers?

Lenny

2)arsenal aren't in administration and they play in England where they make a profit. Hope that helps

Blueice

@4: the vast difference in price was the point in 2. you surely get the idea, especially if Rangers is supposed to be the huge money-making machine Green thinks it is.

5) I think my answer explained the vast difference in prices. Surely you can see that.

Blueice

03 Mar 2013 11:15:22
Our EUFA recognized WR top tier 54 titles remains static for the time being, but a new overall WR 55 titles is coming soon, when winning 3rd division.

03 Mar 2013 13:09:23
What a plonker of a statement. When are you going to accept that this is a lower division title, awarded to minor teams participating in minor leagues. The only title to be counted this year is the title that will soon be awarded to the Scottish Champions along with a place in the Champions league qualification.

@OP: which is the most successful league team in English football history, according to your logic?

Linfield has moved to 51 and on their way to 52 by the time you get back to the top your record will be gone

Hibby here

I honestly thought that the winners of each individual league recorded their achievement. Of course winning a lower league doesn't give access to European competitions but we wouldn't have a top league without leagues below it ergo their importance to the top league shouldn't be under estimated.

It's done, it's over. __________ sand

It dosent matter if its a lower div, its still a leauge title, 55 soon, watp {Ed001's Note - it is a DIVISION title, not league title.}

Is mr lennon the best manager, in scotland. or is it because he has more money than the rest, be careful with your reply, the 3 judges might read it, THE TIC MAN p, s, it is one or the other,

Aslong as its not celik we really couldn't care less

How can anyone claim to be the most successful team by winning the bottom tear don't be so ridiculous

03 Mar 2013 16:05:39
to poster 5, the history books will read Scottish Premier League Champions 2012/13 Glasgow Celtic.

Scottish League Division Three winners Glasgow Rangers, nothing about being the champions of the country, so not a title that will be acknowledged in any history books as a national award, however sure the wee hectors fans will shout and scream its title 55.

Ed shut up, why run a rangers fan site if your a tic, get a life you sad person {Ed001's Note - you aren't very bright are you? I am far from a tic, whatever one of those is. You need to grow up and get an education. Oh and find somewhere else to spout your offensive bile and hatred. How many league titles do Liverpool have? 18. They have also won 4 Division 2 titles, but they aren't counted as league championships for a reason. They are NOT league titles, merely division titles. You only win a league by finishing the season at the top of the highest level of it, not top of the lowest tier.}

@7: I doubt Mervan will win that many.

@13: what about McCoist?

Did he not win against Barcelona and spartak Moscow? Big games. This has been a great season for celtic only a zellot would claim otherwise.

11. So by the logic you're going by winning a division in the 4th tier of Scottish football is the same as Barca winning La Liga this season?

Please don't make us a laughing stock by making claims like that. ED is 100% correct on this one.

@11: this isn't a Rangers fan site but a site for banter about Rangers. You do understand the difference? There are many Rangers fan sites but this isn't one - it's for football fans to have banter about Rangers, although there are sometimes other topics too.

Beat Spartak by cheating, that was a dive, clarify that Lennon.

I see Celtic fans are getting rather upset ‘cos when we win the 3rd, 2nd and the 1st, or any other league set-up that’s put in front of us, on the way to the top, they won’t be any closer to our league total.

@18: are you daft or haven't you read what Ed001 said about leagues etc. Do you think Liverpool have won 22 or 18 league titles?

@18: no, Celtic (and other) fans are laughing at the nonsensical theory that winning Division 3 etc. counts towards the total. Laughable.

@ 18 we will be a lot closer to it than you youll be on 3

N0te to ed so both rangers and celtic have only won a few league titles its only premier league titles that count is that honestly what you believe cheers {Ed001's Note - nope, it is top tier titles that count. Nothing to do with whether they were Prem or prior to the Prem's creation. It is all about whether they were top of the tree or top of a lower tier. It is not really difficult to understand is it?}

@10 Dare I say Ed answers the question because 1) he is intelligent enough to know the answer 2) He isn't blinkered by blue tinged specs and sees facts for facts and 3) to further prove his intelligence I think he isn't far from the mark by describing you as not very bright.

Stupid post from a. well you know the rest.

Gaz

C'mon guys, top league titles only count however I will count div3 as trophies won in total. CheltBlue

03 Mar 2013 10:52:45
The sun is reporting that rangers didn't call for change in the power of clubs to ban fans. Has the sun forgotten that rangers are not entitled to a vote due to their associate memership?

03 Mar 2013 16:59:21
Think hard about the statement, it's really not that hard to understand surely?

And another thing Celtic fans seem to be confused over what mr Green said in the Sun and making out he said Puma are bigger than Nike. He didn't. I quote -- 'Puma and Adidas are the two top football brands. Nike is the best sports brand in the world but they're not the best in football. '

Simple to understand I would have thought.

And as Puma are now part of Gucci guess which fans are gonny look more stylish next season

@1: check the Puma website, which says it is third in football behind adidas and Nike.

@1: just because it's owned by Gucci doesn't mean it'll be Gucci gear. Fiat owns Ferrari but there is a huge difference between the former's 500 and the latter's 458!

Why did green even mention nike? am sure puma didn't pay money to hear green shouting about nike being the best in the world. was he drinking magners at the time by any chance? you couldn't make this up

Think Nike only sponsor the big teams like barca, man utd. But eh ho there not big in football. Puma sponsor who? Dundee

Nike provide strips for Man Utd, Barcelona, Juventus, and Celtic. Each team leading their respective leagues. Not sure how Charles reached the conclusion that puma are bigger. He'd hardly lie now would he?

Which massive European power does Puma produce kits for?

Puma sponsors little teams like the ones in Mexico, have you ever seen any big football player or club in commercials for puma or Nike? Even you can see this can't you, why do you hang on everything cg says when he lies 95% of the time?

@7 They sponsor Italy.

Italy for one!

Down to me I think I would rather wear nike and name the clubs who are sponsored by nike

answers plz

manchester united
inter milan
juventus
aberdeen
celtic
barcelona
thats all I can guess

@9 and 10: sorry, meant club teams.

@11: Aberdeen wear adidas kits. Arsenal, Porto, PSG, Atletico Madrid all wear Nike kits, with Man City to wear Nike from next season too.

Dortmund are the only really big team I can think of that wear Puma kits.

1903

Honestly couldnae gie a f**k, just happy to get shot of Umbro. half expected a new deal with Admiral so Puma will do nicely for me.