Rangers Banter Archive December 05 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


05 Dec 2012 20:43:52
Surely if Rangers do not want to handle an allocation of tickets for tannadice that is there perogative. The fans said they did not want them so why the big furore. If individuals want to go then that is down to them and all the crap from the arabs about the commercial aspects of supporting the association's tournaments showing a lack of integrity.[ that word again] Think back about your threats to your own board about the possible non expulsion from the spl of the Glasgow Rangers. Hypocritical or what?

Believable17 Unbelievable10

Rangers are a disgrace. They are blaming everyone but the poeple who are really responsible about their downfall Green is a joke they should be trying to make amends for the mess they have made of Scottish football, yes it is in a mess. My brother who subscribes to this site and I do feel for him and all the decent fans and it is their choice if the go or don't go to Dundee Utd. For Green to call for the Gers fans to boycott this game is not good for Rangers it hurts football especially in these hard times. If they think Rangers are bigger than football they need their head seen to. I felt sorry for Rangers after all there troubles caused by poeple with Ibrox connection but by behaving like this they are fast losing my and lots of neutral supporters sympathy. Please all good Gers supporters get behind your team and forget all this bitterness for Rangers and footballs sake.
Calum {The Ed039's Note - I agree it is completely wrong and irresponsible of Green to call for this boycott, but each individual has the right to not buy tickets)

Agree20 Disagree13

@1. Calum, we are not blaming people for our downfall - that lies squarely at the feet of SDM and CW, fans of other SPL clubs influenced their chairmen in regards to our predicament and threatened their own clubs with boycotts/withholding season ticket money etc.

Do you not think we should feel aggrieved with that sentiment, maybe those views had some influence within the corridors of the SPL/SFA? Maybe if the SPL/SFA had tried to help one of it's clubs that was in trouble instead of being more interested in punishing it, things might have been completely different for everybody. You should think carefully before you accuse our fans of being a disgrace, we're not the ones who started the boycott threats in the first place.

I agree with you that boycotts are not the way forward (as far as i am concerned) but if enough people feel that strongly about it, then that is their right to pursue that course of action. bigbaz

Agree9 Disagree5

The gate is split so any damage you do to united your doing to your self ... i would think a club thats the result of liquidation with no big tv or champions league money would need all the cash they can get ... its a bit like the scorpio and the frog but if you do hit administration again you cant blame anyone but yourselves

Agree12 Disagree10

1) I am sorry mate but honestly it is well seen you are a visitor to this site. Rangers have not put Scottish football in a mess. Sir. dM and CW put Rangers in a mess. Surely we have suffered enough without being blamed for the woes of Scottish football.It was not us that put us into div three. Green is not doing anything that the fans don't want, and if any want to go, phone United and buy an ticket.

Let's also say that we don't want neutral supporters sympathy, because it is not the neutrals who matter. It is the bigoted view of those that backed their chairmen into a no vote. It is the chairman, thomson being one of the main players who have accused us of everything under the sun, including a report that we were on the grassy knoll.
The bile, accusations, name calling, desire to finish us, may sit well with you. But it does not sit well with us, we are fed up being the whipping boys, and here we have a chance to make our point. Just remember the truth in this, the chairmen of SPL were well warned by their own fans that they would boycott their teams if they voted us in. But they wanted the money we bring so they tried to blackmail SFL clubs by wanting us put in div one, so they could get our money. When that failed and SFL clubs voted the same as them they were horrified.
Thats the truth, and now you want us to give them another pay day, you are mad.
The one section of Scottish football that were not asked, not considered in the summer was the Rangers fans. The problem is that the Rangers fans account for about 40% of the Scottish football fans and yet 600 from St Johnstone, 800 from Dundee United, 1200 from Aberdeen, the fanatics who saw a way to kick us, they called the tunes, the Rangers fans got no say, no consideration, just bile and accusations.
And you think Rangers are a disgrace, well who cares what you say.

Agree17 Disagree12

Every fan should have the choice to attend or not but are now being denied a chance by your chief executive. As for the OP, for the last time Rangers were not expelled. They lost their SPL status when they were liquidated, and the new club were denied entry.

Agree8 Disagree6

@3. Somehow i don't think we will go into administration because a few thousand fans didn't turn up for a cup game.

Thanks for the concern anyway, don't remember you being so concerned about us when the SPL were deciding our future, quite the opposite, most SPL fans were very vocal about what they wanted to happen, hence why we have the boycott scenario in the first place.

Shouldn't you be on the Celtic pages, after all your team had a great result tonight by qualifying for the last 16. bigbaz

Agree6 Disagree7

Dm and cg owned rangers and could do what they liked with it ... if you sell your car and the buyer crashes it ... what have you got to moan about

Agree7 Disagree3

@5 what are you on about if any fan wants a ticket all they have to do is apply to d/united.Just for you for the last time as you put it the company that ran Rangers are going through a liquidation process,you sound like a little bitter person what's wrong did that big club Rangers no disappear well tough get over it .

Agree5 Disagree9

What is it you hope to achieve ?? i didnt see all the fuss when united played stranraer did they bring a big crowd ?? no ... did they go bankrupt ? no ... you are just like all the other 3rd division teams they got drew against not expecting a big crowd but an easy passage to the next round

Agree6 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 20:08:41
I am starting to see a pattern emerging regarding the fans boycott of Tannadump. If you are a Rangers fan - you are petty, bitter and twisted for doing this, It's not good for Scottish football, we're trying to move on, let bygones be bygones etc etc.

Now correct me if i'm wrong, it wasn't so long ago that fans of other SPL clubs were demanding that their chairmen voted against our SPL inclusion otherwise they would boycott their own grounds/refuse to buy season tickets etc.

I personally don't like the idea of boycotts - but if that is the majority feeling, then go for it. Its hypocritical of fans of other teams decrying our fans for doing this, after all you demanded it first. bigbaz

Believable23 Unbelievable14

The fans of other teams wanted Rangers not to be allowed into the SPL as it was right: the alternative would have set a very dangerous precedent as teams could rack up debts, go into administration then liquidation and still be in the same league upon reformation.

That wasn't petty but support for doing the right thing in the whole grand scheme of things. Rangers' boycott has nothing to do with that: it's about petty revenge. {The Ed039's Note - Same old story, everybody is right bar Rangers, do you not think it is justified in a way, when Dundee United supporters said to their own chairman, if you vote Rangers out we will buy season books, if you dont, we wont turn up? Oh and by the way, I can see they have been turning out in their masses. Now, I dont agree with the boycott in the sense that there should be support for the football team from the terraces, which for me is the most important thing, but I can understand the point of view) {The Ed039's Note -

Agree14 Disagree17

If the mighty new rangers were allowed straight into spl, it would open the floodgates up for Kilmarnock, hearts etc to close down not pay anyone then restart in spl, is that fair, and that's what u lot can't see, rules have been broken, new company void of previous debt. Started, what can't you understand where spl supporters are coming from?

Agree10 Disagree1

3) don't be stupid, nobody wants to go bust, so the thought of clubs just going bust is rubbish. Tell me please what "rules" have been broken, is that the rules that didnt exist, that they made up as and when they saw fit. Please understand this, we don't care what the other fans say. They mean nothing to us, we have heard everything they have to say, and most of it is bile. They accuse us of affecting Scottish football, but t.he truth is the game in this country, the national sport, is dying on its feet, the wrong decision for football was taken because of talk of boycotts for their own team.
They don't like us, they don't want us, but they do want our money, well sorry they can't have it.

You understand this, we have had enough, time to fight back.

Agree5 Disagree6

@3. The SPL could have docked us enough points to relegate us to Div 1, also maybe start that season with a points deduction as well, which would have been a good deterrent to all clubs.

The financial benefits in Div 1 are significantly lower than the SPL so we would not gain that way either. Do you seriously think for one minute that we wanted to go into liquidation, if we had had the result of the EBT case when we were supposed to, then i doubt very much if liquidation would have happened.

Yes rules were broken, and some made up 'ad hock', this whole scenario has benefited nobody. We know fine well where 'spl supporters are coming from', we've had to listen to it and read it for the last year. You don't seem to like it when we stand up for ourselves, maybe now you've realized now that this tiger has teeth. bigbaz

Agree4 Disagree5

@4 Docking enough points to cause relegation? Don't see that option in the rule book. I thought you guys were against making up punishments on the hop.
Al

Agree3 Disagree0

Al. To be fair to bigbaz he acknowledged in his post that some rules were made up and some were created 'ad hoc'. That wasn't the point he was making. He was asked about a suitable deterrent to stop other clubs following suit and he simply replied with one. It was clear the majority of chairmen (including Petrie who came up with the parachute idea) wanted to retain Rangers in the SPL (financially not morally), otherwise the fans would not have needed to become involved in the first place. Surely you can admit that? Instead of taking the bull by the horns and making a decision themselves which would have ensured Rangers ended up in the First division (similar to the punishment eventually meted out to Juventus for match fixing which was far worse) they passed the buck onto the SFL and tried to blackmail them into making the decision for them, thus reducing the flak they would receive from their own fans. It backfired spectacularly when the SFL saw an opportunity to have Rangers in their leagues for at least three years (it was never about 'sporting integrity' for them either - it was about finances and getting one over on the SPL). Now we collectively have a vastly reduced TV package, a clutch of quality players lost to the Scottish game (Naismith etc not the current team), competing ideas on league reconstruction, the SPL and SFL further apart than they have ever been and ready to go to war with each other, SPL clubs admitting they are struggling, Hearts, Kilmarnock and Dunfermline (who need not have been relegated) tottering on the brink, and the SFA haplessly standing by and watching it all happen when they should be dictating to these 'governing' bodies what would be in the best interests of the game overall in the first place. If the SPL chairmen had shown some cahonas and ensured they could protect themselves financially whilst still adequately punishing Rangers by employing an idea such as the one bigbaz gave then we may not be where we are just now.

Admittedly I have personally always favoured the Third Division as punishment as that is the SFL ruling on the matter and precedents had been set but the SPL did not have rules in place (even though they knew from the previous October that Rangers were in dire trouble financially and had plenty of time to create some) to cater for liquidation and are a separate entity to the SFL. Technically they could have accepted Rangers in and instantly relegated them via points deductions as bigbaz suggested as the SPL currently only constitutes one league and that would be as severe a punishment as they could inflict upon one of their member clubs. Bar Celtic's successful European run Scottish football has become a complete and utter laughing stock in the eyes of many. All of the above was avoidable. Ask Ed001's opinion on how Scottish football is perceived south of the border now if you don't believe me.

Brian

Agree3 Disagree0

@5. Al, it did not stop rules being made up when it suited the SPL/SFA agenda. Why not use a points deduction system to relegate Rangers. It would have prevented alot of what has transpired. bigbaz

Agree2 Disagree1

@5. Forgot to mention - don't remember many non Rangers fans complaining about rules being made up on the spot against Rangers, i remember most saying "Serves you right", you get what you deserve etc etc etc.

Agree3 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 19:42:33
Apprars there already is a Rangers International Football Club - In Nigeria .Surely not.......

Paddy Malarkey {The Ed039's Note - Anyone posting this you will find you are wrong, there is an Enugu Rangers International Football Club in Nigeria)

Believable2 Unbelievable9

"Rangers International football club" of Enugu popularly called Enugu Rangers {The Ed039's Note - Full name Enugu Rangers International Football Club)

Agree1 Disagree3

Have u nothing better to do Paddy? If you support Celtic, should you not be there or watching them on TV. bigbaz {The Ed039's Note - Paddy is a Partick Thistle supporter)

Agree2 Disagree6

But they own copyright to name, since when can you take 80% of it..... doh!

see a court case there.... letters from nigeria, most will be 911s...

Agree2 Disagree0

Don't do humour now ? Why the hostility?

Paddy Malarkey

Agree5 Disagree0

I knew Paddy was mental, a jags fan! {The Ed039's Note - I said she was a jags fan, I didnt say she was mental)

Agree1 Disagree0

So by your logic of copyrighting part of the name dundee united are in clear breach of dundee football club since it is part of their name? And dundee were formed before dundee united...

Agree2 Disagree1

@2. Cheers Ed, was not sure which team she supported. Sorry Paddy for suggesting you should watch Celtic, it's bad enough reading their fans banter on here. LOL. bigbaz

Agree4 Disagree0

I feel sorry for Paddy supporting PTFC, what a depressing life. {The Ed039's Note - Cant be any more depressing than what we have been through this year)

Agree2 Disagree1

You cant copy write the name of a city

Agree2 Disagree0

@8. Supporting Partick is depressing?? Don't remember it being a 'barrel of laughs' for us this year. Partick are in a league we hope to be in a couple of seasons, so be nice, remember we are supposed to be making friends on the way up, don't start p*ssing their fans off before we even get there. Be Nice. bigbaz

Agree4 Disagree0

05 Dec 2012 18:14:35
Right the game is live on feb 2 so PLEASE CHARLES GREEN get the game live on beam back to Ibrox and we will be there. I was at the last one ( i think) when we beat Dundee utd at Tannadice but didnt win the league which was nearly 10 in a row and you will get a bigger crowd than then.

Believable3 Unbelievable5

It's not allowed!
Stop trying to cut corners! {The Ed039's Note - I wouldnt think so)

Agree7 Disagree0

Sure TV will go for that... but they will charge about 1/2 million just for the pleasure.

Agree2 Disagree1

How would it no be allowed rangers can do what they want in there stadium

SM {The Ed039's Note - Because they would need to acquire the broadcasting rights to the game)

Agree1 Disagree3

05 Dec 2012 22:41:45
If you want to see the match or support your team then get on the phone to Rangers tomorrow and tell them that as a supporter or season ticket holder you are mortified by our club's stance on this. Who the f##k do the RSA think they are? I want to support Rangers no matter what, now I am being stopped from doing this and nobody can give a valid reason why. If there is no sale of tickets for Tannadice then I am done with this sh##e. I will never be back inside Ibrox and neither will my son or grandson. I am not prepared to be bullied and dictated to which games I should and shouldn't attend by anyone. I was utterly embarrassed at work like never before, even the Celtic fans who were concerned for us during administration and liquidation were having a dig. All this protest nonsense should not be tolerated by all decent minded Rangers fans, they all have a big mouth sitting on their PCs but anyone protesting at the ground should be arrested and banned from ALL football stadiums.

Have you all forgotten we nearly didn't have a club. We sing Follow Follow, not Follow when we are told to.

Disgusted Bear.

Agree7 Disagree7

Do you not need Dundee United's permission for beam back ?
Tam

Agree5 Disagree1

Calm down dear.
There's nothing to stop you going to the match if you want to so put your toys back in the pram and stop being a drama queen.
CG never called for the boycott he was contacted by supporters groups who did straw polls and the majority of fans who bothered to vote voted for the boycott. CG is not irresponsible on this occasion he is listening to the fans, the rest of the spl chairmen listened to their fans,so why is CG in the wrong? Obviously this scenario will split opinion but everyone is entitled to their own. I'm getingt a bit hacked off with other teams fans having a go at us again for doing exactly what their chairmen did only 5 short months ago,or have some people forgotten that already?
Rangers fans like you also get on my wick,because your making a song and dance about nothing. Contact DUFC ticket office and reserve a ticket for the away end. Simples. One final thought. If Eddie Thomson hadl been alive today and still chairman,this situation would not have arisen. His son and successor is a bigoted clown.
P.O.B.

Agree3 Disagree5

@4. No valid reason? If fans like those of DU had their way, we would have no club or even a league to play in. I agree it should be an individuals choice whether he/she decides to attend the game.

Although i am not a fan of the boycott idea, this time I am glad CG has done what he has. Why were you embarrassed, our fans/club are finally standing up for ourselves, it was more embarrassing when they used to do nothing.

If you are so disgusted by your fellow fans attitude regarding this matter, then by all means give up your season ticket for Ibrox - there are plenty of others who will gladly take it (there is a waiting list).

Whilst i'm not decrying your differing opinion as a Rangers fan, i find it strange you are so vehemently protesting about this issue, as most fans who have disagreed with this outcome, are a tad more restrained with their comments on the subject. bigbaz

Agree3 Disagree5

Not sure Tam, think we will need SKY/ESPNs permission before anyone else. bigbaz

Agree1 Disagree0

4) Listen you are a big boy if you want to go, phone United and buy a ticket. You don't need anybody's permission to do that.

Agree2 Disagree1

So, on the one hand you're mortified that the club would dictate when and how to support them and on the other, bar your son and grandchild from ever going. Jeeso, Irony is really lost on some people.

Agree2 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 15:56:17
Rangers aim to raise 27million from float which is expected in 10days time. With 17milliom already pledged through business. And it clearly states that mike ashley will have a 5% stake in the club as part of this deal.

Interesting times ahead my fellow gers

Believable8 Unbelievable13

And how come Green has more shares than any other individual investor? He kept that one quiet. {The Ed039's Note - Did you think the front man was not going to have more shares than anybody of the others?)

Agree5 Disagree7

£50 million valuation - wow where did that come from for div3 club with debts nearing £100million ?

Green has nearly 10%, so £5 million alone. wow - for less than one years work. {The Ed039's Note - Which 3rd Division club has debts of nearly £100 million? Do you have any idea how silly your post makes you look? And you have the cheek to slag Charles Green)

Agree17 Disagree9

Think @2 has been using the Seville calculator again Ed. bigbaz

Agree14 Disagree1

Something not ringing true about this. Where's the prospectus?

Agree6 Disagree1

Sorry to bust yur bubble ed, but there is an appeal underway, for ebts paying footballers... is that a football debt by any chance ?

Does BDO have no recourse to law to claw back assets in newco under gratuitous alienation (you already agreed history bought for just £1 - what all those trophies from so many titles... shirley not?)...

Green often involved with floats, where most of the shareholders value evaporates, and he stands down pretty quickly, same could happen here if the assets in float no longer belong to green&co {The Ed039's Note - What has that got to do with the other posts?)

Agree3 Disagree2

@5. Point of order - appeal is not underway. HMRC seek permission to apply for an appeal, big difference. No permission = No appeal.

Agree7 Disagree3

@6 appeal is underway, permission to appeal in a 2-1 case is virtually automatic.

Only two results in FTT, 2-1 or 3-0. Think about it. 2-1 is really more 50-50. {The Ed039's Note - What school did you go to? When has 2-1 ever been 50-50?)

Agree2 Disagree5

@7 appeal isn't underway , permission is still to be sought to appeal, and as for your arithmetical skill or lack of regards 2:1 being 50/50 I really despair at the educational system in this country.

Agree3 Disagree0

@3 Naw man he used the manchester calculator.
Tam

Agree3 Disagree1

7) so 2-1 is a draw, then Celtic are out CL. You really should think before making a fool of yourself.

Agree3 Disagree1

3-0 in maths is 100%-0%
2-1 in maths is 60%-40%

seems to me one is very nearly 50-50, little wonder gers collapsed when fans struggle with even simple maths and logic. a split decision is noy one sided and therefore open to appeal.

note 30+ ebts already accepted as illegal and subject to task at ftt

so now appeal in law to consider the remainder, and finding flaws in law so much easier. gers fans clutching at straws and false hope. hmrc will bring on the big legal guns, will murray if he looses this round he could loose control of mih , where banks already have him but the short and curlies..... {Ed001's Note - 2-1 would be 66.66% to 33.33%, not 60-40. Your maths is appalling, that is closer to 70-30 than 50-50.}

Agree1 Disagree0

70-30 is still closer to 50-50 than 100-0, so you concede the point. the spin that the ftt decision was a win was marvellous, and ignore true facts, it was closer to 50-50 that outright victory.

so some ebt's not legal run, others now being appealed, fact remains this not done and dusted.

to win (barely) the ftt mih had to resort to trying to fool the judges by tampering with witnesses well done mr red, why go there.... you undermine credibility of mih and any future appeal.

new judges will go was mih trying to withhold and hide what they doing...yup...no why? and mih have to have legally sound reasons to mislead judges..........doh! {Ed001's Note - don't be so stupid. It is nothing like 50-50, only an imbecile would try and claim it is. You have made every post irrelevant by this one bit of idiocy. If you can't understand this is nothing like a 50-50 split, which is the whole point of having 3 in judgement rather than 2, then you are obviously not intelligent enough to understand anything. Why don't you stop being so bitter and run along and celebrate your own team's magnificent result last night. It is sad that you are far too twisted with hatred to even enjoy that because you are far too busy trying to make a complete fool of yourself on here.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed . both decisions in a FTT are valid if it splits 2-1. BOTH!

UTT can pick either and THEN set legal precident. They dont have to follow the majority - where does it say that! Also the UTT can make its own determination without any regard to the FTT at all - should it wish, but based on LAW not facts.

Not imbecilic to point out facts, not spin. {Ed001's Note - what are you talking about? What has that got to do with someone not understanding the reason we have 3 judges. I am sure his bitter mind probably thinks it is something to do with Masonic numbers and rituals. It is not. It is simply because it is the only way to have a majority vote give a CLEAR majority, one that is nowhere near 50-50. Both decisions are not valid, but it can be appealed and the decision taken to a UTT, in which case the FTT decision becomes overruled by the higher court. Not that it matters yet, there has been no decision made on whether or not it goes to a UTT or not. As for a legal precedent, that is currently this decision, though it is not a final decision as each case will still have to be decided on its own merits, a precedent is just a guideline, it is not the be all and end all.}

Agree0 Disagree0

@11 'simple maths' and 12. 2-1 equates to 66 and two thirds to infinity against 33 and a third to infinity, not 70-30 or 60-40. Fxxx me.

If I were to miss a bus by a minute one day and only miss it by one second the next then how close I got to getting on it would be irrelevant as I would still have missed it! It could have been one hundred judges voting 51 - 49 in Rangers favour, majority verdict wins the day - end of. This pointless exercise is going to cost millions for no end product no matter the outcome. Give it up, plus the appeal isn't as guaranteed to happen as you are implying either. It hasn't been granted yet.

Brian

Agree1 Disagree0

@14. Give up Brian, some of there fans will argue black is white, keep your posts for the celtic/other fans on here who talk some sense. bigbaz

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Dec 2012 11:44:05
Edo, if this share issue is now off... Was there not enough interest? Over four days CG released statements saying it was at £21m pledged then £22m then £23m etc... Was that mair fibs? Why is it off? What are Park n Wattie daein? Not enough communication coming out....you hearin anything? What about Jim Traynor rumours? Director Communications? {The Ed039's Note - What are you talking about? Papers were lodged today and it is anticipated first days of flotation will be 10 days from now? As for the Jim Traynor rumour, a load of old tosh mate)

Believable2 Unbelievable10

A share flotation? in 10 days? Prospectus just issued? No way. No time for any Data Room or Due Diligence. Farce. {The Ed039's Note - According to experts it is normal to lodge documents 10 days prior to flotation)

Agree3 Disagree5

Edd we all know the hooped ones are experts on anything Rangers. Wether it be tax or share flotations they have our interests at heart. Bless 'em. CheltBlue {The Ed039's Note - I'm not saying I am right, I am no expert on either issue but I know what I read and see on the news)

Agree5 Disagree1

Prospectus supposed to be issued 17 days before issue for full scrutiny. So where is the prospectus? Green hasn't made any statements.

Agree1 Disagree4

Haha Ed believes what he sees on the news! Bless your cotton socks Ed.
Even less intelligence than I originally gave you credit for! {The Ed039's Note - I live in Fort William mate, you need thicker socks than that up here)

Agree3 Disagree2

ED039. No it is NOT normal to lodge a prospectus ten days before flotation. I do these things for a living, this is not happening. 10 days would not give me time to even speak to potential investors or even send them an invitation. And where is the normal Investor Roadshow? Zilch. Not happening. Bogus. {Ed001's Note - then you would know that every case is different. I used to work for a printers that were printing the prospectus the week before a flotation for (if I remember correctly) ICI. Whereas other times we would be preparing documentation for them months in advance.}

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Dec 2012 13:18:23
Ed a wee question if a game is called off for any reason , is it not that both team's agree a price structure for the replay . just for those who want to boycot. {The Ed039's Note - Yes but I think it is one of these unwritten rules, essentially the hosting side have the final say)

Believable1 Unbelievable2

05 Dec 2012 14:10:00
What are Rangers playing for if they dont want anything to do with the SPL? Are they happy playing down in div3 and thats it? Everton fan.

Believable11 Unbelievable16

Yeah, thats what we want to do ??, a bit like everton, play in a league year in year out and do nothing !!

Agree24 Disagree7

Classic No1.

Agree12 Disagree7

Good to see fans from the biggest league in the world are interested our wee 4th tier team.

Agree5 Disagree2

05 Dec 2012 13:57:48
Was it the board on which Walter serves that unanimously decided on the boycott of tickets ? A man who did great service at Tannadice as player and coach ? And Ally voted to send out his young team against one of your deadly foes without support from the terraces ? Looks from the outside like more self-inflicted harm to add to the stuff done by others.
BANTER ALERT Why not organise a march away from Hampden (and the SFA)to Ibrox Stadium on the day of the game and, as a group, listen to radio commentary and spend your money on merchandise and refreshments ? Be just like the old days before blanker TV coverage of football .

Paddy Malarkey

Believable7 Unbelievable9

Cups are not a priority, so we dont care who we send out, and to where, winning div 3 is our goal, so sorry that we dont care about cups or spl, dont let it eat away at you !!

Agree6 Disagree8

@1
Only care about the Jags my friend .You appear to be a teensy bit paranoid . You'll find we're out of the cup and missing it already . I take it you're speaking for all Rangers' supporters and the club? If so, why not withdraw from the competition and remove the problem?

Paddy Malarkey

Agree7 Disagree2

05 dec 2012 13:37:59
interesting that it was only yesterday cg said we didnt want tckts for the utd cup tie, and 2 days later the sfa can manage to organise a meeting to discuss this matter, its amazing how quickly things move when rangers are involved, wish they could have moved that quick over the last year !!

Believable10 Unbelievable5

It was a scheduled meeting, no doubt it'll fit into the meeting under AOB.

Agree3 Disagree3

05 Dec 2012 13:32:46
We are Rangers,and all we care about ,is winning our way through the leagues,fairly and honestly,we are sick of the tripe slung our way,thats one reason for our dislike of Some clubs,not all,just Some,they know who they are,so enough of your highground mentality,You do need a Rangers in your lives,for good or bad,we will be back to claim our crown back,so rest easy for now.Rangers then,Rangers now,Rangers Always.

Believable20 Unbelievable10

05 Dec 2012 13:29:01
Dundee United 'won't dignify' Rangers' statement with response

05 December 2012 13:07 GMT
Dundee United have said that they are "disappointed" with Rangers' decision to refuse tickets for the Scottish Cup match between the sides and say they won't dignify Ibrox chief executive Charles Green's statement with a response.

Believable3 Unbelievable4

Dundee utd "wont dignify" rangers statement with a "response", by "responding" that they are "disappointed" , silly obssesed !!

Agree4 Disagree4

Thomson only getting what he deserves

Agree5 Disagree4

Won't 'dignify Rangers' with a response? Pity they did not apply similar tactics when they were one of the clubs at the forefront of kicking us and being very vocal about our SPL status. bigbaz

Agree8 Disagree4

No Half as disapointed as the bank manager

Agree4 Disagree0

Guys we were liquidated owing tens of millions. It was a disgrace.
We should never have had the option of immediate entry to the SPL because that's outside the rules. We should have immediately have started in div3. No votes or such.
Spl chairmen were in their right to discuss the issue publicly and vote against it. {The Ed039's Note - It wasnt outside the rules because there were no rules for it)

Agree6 Disagree2

@5. We were liquidated owing about 18 million, with the threat of the EBT hanging over our heads, Not 10s of millions.

Agree4 Disagree3

Ed where in the rules does it safe a phoenix can walk stright into SPL ? {The Ed039's Note - Nowhere, but until recently, it also didnt say they automatically had to go to Div 3 either, so what is your point?)

Agree4 Disagree0

05 Dec 2012 12:05:36
Maybe if Green could say that their share of the gate would be donated to Bernardos Dundee utd could sell the away allocation to ppl that want to attend game and all would benefit ...DUFC, a charity, and sevco making their point with the boycott ?...Chico the balls in your court ...TTTS

Believable3 Unbelievable13

The idea is Rangers can make money off of an SPHell club for a change.

Agree8 Disagree8

CG has already returned serve. He backed the majority of the fans. Anyone who wishes to go to the game can contact DUFC ticket office. As usual on here much ado about nothing.
P.O.B.

Agree11 Disagree5

Is it the bit where donating the away allocation to charity that the 5 disagree with ? Surely you don't want the gate share ? More shambolic that symbolic if you boycott the game and hold out your hand ..... TTTS

Agree3 Disagree4

We DO NOT need the gate share from that game. Donate to charity if DU wish, i am quite open to that idea. bigbaz

Agree2 Disagree1

4) they have already contacted the SFA to say they keep the gate money. Let them have it, that is all they are interested in. They say they will fill the ground, good, pity the next week there will be the usual 6000 punters.

Agree2 Disagree0

@5: isn't money all Green is interested in too?

Agree1 Disagree1

@5. I doubt if they have enough of a fan base to fill their ground, if they do fill the ground out then where are they the rest of the time? As you say, there will be the usual amount there no matter what. bigbaz

Agree1 Disagree0

Re are entitle to our share of gate money cause there will be some rangers support their

Agree1 Disagree1

@TTTS. Have you considered that the people hitting the disagree button (I never usually pay them any attention anyway) may actually support the charity angle you suggested but object to the childish 'sevco' (really getting boring now) reference which spoilt an otherwise decent post? If I made a decent point on the Celtic page and followed it up with a petty reference to Pacific Shelf whatever the number is which button would you press out of interest?

I honestly think there will have to be some form of punitive action taken against Green (not the club) as his actions, if allowed to proceed unchecked, will set a very dangerous precedent within football and provoke a tit-for-tat mentality amongst supporters and rival chairmen. He should have left it to the fans to make their own minds up. A large percentage would probably have boycotted the game anyway (which they are perfectly entitled to do), but we would also still have had some form of support at the game cheering on the team at the same time.

He did not have to involve himself and the club in it and if the fans chose not to take up anywhere near the usual amount of tickets allocated of their own volition then the SFA would not, and could not, have become involved in it. Now, because a leading representative of a member club is actively encouraging his own fans to stay away, the SFA will be left with no choice but to retaliate as they also have sponsors and the other member clubs to consider. It was a stupid, and possibly costly, move by Green in my opinion.

However, on your holding out your hand point I have been to many cup games, as you probably have too, where the away end has been virtually empty. Some Rangers fans will still go, despite Green's comments, even if they have to buy the tickets through United. Are you saying that we, or any other club whose fans don't turn up in large numbers, shouldn't be entitled to their share of the gate? That is just as dangerous a precedent to set as the one Green just has if that is what you are implying.

Brian

Agree1 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 11:19:22
Dundee United calling for the SFA to take action against Rangers for refusing tickets, will that mean another rule change to suit the circumstances? Bit of a pattern forming with the SPL/SFA about rule changes PB

Believable17 Unbelievable5

They can stick their tickets,its our own decision ,what happens when they dont even turn up for their own home games,they are just annoyed they will not be able to fleece Rangers fans,shower of cowboys.

Agree10 Disagree2

05 Dec 2012 13:34:19
the rules state that any unsold must be returned 24 hrs before the game, so take 50 ticks and return the day before simples

DJ

Agree7 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 10:55:57
I'm a Celtic fan but hear me out ,first I think boycott has been talked of in Scottish football for the last two seasons first it was Celtic fans saying if rangers stay in spl they will boycott all games as well as the ones at Celtic pk against them as well as many other clubs fans threating the same thing but for the club too do it is a very different matter if rangers go through with this green and some rangers fans are going too put rangers back ten years as instead of three and the chance of putting them selfs in the dark for many years with certain too push fans of all clubs too make ther own stance against rangers ,my words is this green is gona go the minute he makes money out of this he is a known associate of white It's all a smoke screen and if he was offerd the right money too knock down ibrox tomoro it would be done go ask any sheffield untd fain

Believable13 Unbelievable18

05 Dec 2012 09:45:14
Keith Jackson last night on Clyde said a very interesting thing

He said why are other teams fans up in arms at the Charles Green statement, when has basically done what every other chairman did during the summer.

Their fans demanded a say in where Rangers should play, they gave their fans what they wanted.

Rangers fans groups have said they do not want fans to attend the cup tie.

Green is merely following his clubs fans wishes.

You cannot say that is wrong unless you say it was wrong for clubs during the summer to give fans a say too !!

Believable21 Unbelievable12

He didnt need to say anything. The fans that dont want to go dont go the fans that want to go then they go. End off

Ian

Agree13 Disagree5

The spl clubs each had a vote, some clubs gave the decision to their fans for that legal vote, whether enforce the regulations or break them to allow a newco directly into SPL.
Green has issued a call for a blanket ban of Dun Utd because extreme fans are pushing for it. True to form Green panders to this. There's 50,000 rangers fans go to games, the majority do not want to boycott its only a couple thousand that's why Greens statement is wrong. Basically telling all fans they can't go is an affront. This man had never watched Rangers in his life up until recently.

Agree7 Disagree9

Answer 1 spot on,fans would have attended or boycott on their own, Newco Rangers have now made it official and opened themselves and Chuckie who has scored another OG here to censor, the SFA should throw the book at him for this and at the very least Rangers should be denied any monies from this tie

Agree10 Disagree14

Thing with CG is that he is trying to be all Rangers fans friend and he doesnt need to. Look at your support from the start of all this I think that Rangers fans have proved they are Loyal (no pun intended) and CG doesnt need to come out with all his stupid statements and trying to get everyone to bite. CG run your business in a professional manner and stop trying to upset every man and his dog outside of rangers.

Ian

Agree5 Disagree3

There's a difference between boycotting your own team to make your own board take action and boycotting another team to "make them suffer" (RSA Quote). Peaceful demonstration is perfectly acceptable in the free world but when you add words like "hate, suffer, war, destroy", etc. in your justifications then why would your "enemies" be expected to have any sympathy or not respond with wishes to have you kicked out of the game and removed from society?

Foxy

Agree7 Disagree6

Looks like the majority of Rangers fans wishes have been heard by CG. Obviously touched a nerve with the Non Rangers fans on this forum, no longer will we stand idly by and let our detractors do as they see fit. Our fans are now more united than we ever have been, the sleeping giant has awoken and it is extremely p*ssed off.

Agree4 Disagree2

@6: and, as a result, the club is seen as petty and bitter. But then, you probably don't care about that. You should though as reputation counts in business.

What about the Rangers fans who don't want to boycott or to be seen as petty and bitter?

Agree3 Disagree0

@7. Reputation? So does Integrity, but that mantra seems to have disappeared now from certain quarters. If other fans consider us petty and bitter, then that's their opinion, funny how it only seems to apply to us! Were other SPL fans petty and bitter when they demanded boycotts of Rangers? The majority of our fans appear to be behind this boycott, whilst i personally do not think it's the best idea - i am not against it. bigbaz

Agree2 Disagree2

@8: the demand for a boycott was so that a liquidated club didn't just waltz back into the top league. Would that have been right if it had happened? {The Ed039's Note - Do you think the circumstances might have been different had it been say Aberdeen, or Dundee United, I have my suspicions it would have been a completely different result in the end)

Agree4 Disagree0

@9. No i agree, no-one should just 'waltz' back into the SPL, nor should they have been given the treatment or abuse that was directed at us by certain parties. We accepted that our club should start the new season in Div 3, but did not accept the way Rangers were trying to be shoe horned into Div 1 to help the 'sporting integrity' SPL try and save their precious TV deal. bigbaz

Agree3 Disagree0

05 Dec 2012 09:37:40
Firstly with all this talk of boycotting...

The boycotting began after the ticket fiasco of the abandoned game attendances dropped from 14000 at the utd gers game to less than 9000 check the stats.

Rangers allocation for utd is in the region of 5400 the games after the fiasco other than the title winning gers only sold approx 4000 so a drop of 1400.

Some bears could take what happened and move on but after everything else that Thompson has done I think it's the straw that's broke the camels back I for one wouldn't boycott in any other circumstance however this is different.

As for taking no gate money from the game I'd say b****cks to that. Take the 40% or whatever it is and give it straight to erskine hospital or help for hero's or my personal choice Yorkhill sick kids charity a nice wee lift to them.

Thoughts bears?.

Jimmy

Believable13 Unbelievable7

If this is a one-off then fair enough it makes a statement but let this be the end to it. As far as gate money is concerned the SFA are meeting next week to discuss sanctions against Rangers for not participating fully in the competition - I think they will dock the gate money as a fine.
JMG

Agree8 Disagree2

Why would docking dun utd fans gate money from dun utd be appropriate?
No. A fine against Rangers of at least double the Elgin fine would be a start and then recompense Dun utd for any financial losses, the same as Elgin.

Agree4 Disagree8

Yes newco and Chuckie could not be trusted to hand the money over to charity, I think a large fine is the best Newco can hope for,if the SFA had any balls they would kick them out for bringing the game into disrepute

Agree7 Disagree6

JMG. Mate it was never about the money.

Agree6 Disagree2

Expulsion fro the competition is an option for them!

Agree6 Disagree5

4} what you talking about get in step. it's all about an extra £20 3 years ago. or have i got it wrong ? shammy

Agree2 Disagree3

Celtic fans spouting tripe as usual!
Why are you so obsessed? If CG doesnt want to take the tickets then he doesnt have to simples! All this talk of placing a fine on Rangers is total horse crap. You lot really do live in cloud cuckoo land.

Agree10 Disagree2

05 Dec 2012 09:30:25
I'm really pleased with the options in the squad going forward. Big Kyle was excellent on Sunday as was Barrie McKay. With McCulloch able to play a role similar to Kyle we have 2 big target men capable of doing a turn for us. Out wide Templeton and McKay can be prolific and with guys like Little, Sandaza, Naismith, Aird, Crawford all available and Hemmings and Mitchell to come back in we look really good in attack.
Midfield is decent enough but i would like to see Hutton get a run ahead of Black as i think Hutton is a more tidy player than Black and has the physique to handle himself at this level, McLeod has been a revelation this season and it's great to see guys like him, McKay, Aird, Crawford and Naismith making an impact.
In defence i am a bit concerned. Our centre halves have been shacky to say the least this season and i feel the solution is Lee Wallace. I saw him play centre half at Hearts a few years ago and was really impressed with him. He has plenty of pace, is tall enough to challange in the air and comfortable on the ball. Even short term i'd rather see Wallace play alongside Hegarty instead of McCulloch purely down to pace.
As a whole i think if the club can bring these young guys on like they have been doing over the past few months and we manage to hold onto the likes of Alexander, Wallace and Shields then we'll be in great shape going forward. I still think Cribari was a poor signing and would rather see a partnership of Perry and Hegarty at centre half getting a run ahead of him. Theres no better way for these 2 young guys to get their apprenticship than in the rough and tumble of SFL3 IMO.
J1985

Believable9 Unbelievable7

05 Dec 2012 09:29:05
richard gough says we should not boycott game. time to put it all to bed and just get on with it. we still owe dundee utd 30,000 quid. id be annoyed if we were owed that kind of money

Believable12 Unbelievable7

SPL still owe us our money for finishing 2nd, correct me if I'm wrong but did they not say they would pay for rangers football debts?

Agree7 Disagree7

@1. That is a point I have raised on here many a time and have e-mailed the SPL about personally. Surprisingly I have not received a reply to date, lol. Where did the money held back go to and what did it pay for? The SPL told Green he wasn't entitled to it because it related to the Oldco, the Oldco didn't receive it either though so the creditors have been short changed by the SPL to the sum of £2.6m, and clearly, as the OP highlighted, it wasn't used to pay off existing footballing debts accrued by Rangers (which is the reason I thought it was retained for). I would like to know what, or who, it was spent on and if it has not been spent yet where it is and what it will be used for?

Brian

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Dec 2012 09:12:14
Think Charles green has went about this boycott in the wrong way. Instead of rejecting all tickets from Dundee utd he should have only asked for 200 tickets. This way he was still putting the point across about the boycott but at least there would be a section of fans there to cheer on the team. However going down this road has left it open for the SFA to give all the gate money to utd, more of their fans will probably turn up in defiance about the boycott and the only club to benefit will be utd. Charles Green has done well mostly when taking over Rangers but this boycott could backfire on Rangers

Believable6 Unbelievable6

05 Dec 2012 07:38:42
Miko on Celtic website saying Celtic fans should goto dundee utd game, I'd be more worried about filling your own park miko.

Believable15 Unbelievable8

You worried mate aye. Imagine another red neck watching the game and Celtic being in the away end you left vacated. Wonder what your players would be thinking while they were being slaughtered from all 4 sides without reply while getting they're arses tanned by the Dundee Hibee's lol

Dont worry about paradise being full tonight buddy :D

Agree5 Disagree6

The only time parkeads full

Agree8 Disagree0

05 Dec 2012 03:42:52
We're buying your away end tickets for the UTD game!

Already got nearly 100 definite's and that's since tea time tonight . Were gonna get after the tickets tomorrow. What a sight this will be to see. Dundee Utd vs Rangers in the cup. Utd will sell out they're allocation along with Celtic fans in the away end. When Utd win the party will go on into the night. Pretty sure this will be a first of its kind.

Wonder what the Rangers players will be thinkin, trudging off after they get they're backsides tanned and having been peltered for 90 mins with no reply? {Ed001's Note - yet you can't fill your own ground? So sad that you hate Rangers more than you love your own club. This is why Scotland is a laughing stock in England, why your league is struggling and why you are not wanted in the English league. Petty beyond belief.}

Believable6 Unbelievable8

So when gers win and run up to the away support what will yous do ,through your scarves onto the pitch lol lol then again yous are used to throwing your scarves away lol doug t.s.o

Agree13 Disagree5

You should start buying tickets for your own midden first,Rangers will beat UTD,What will all you sour faced dhims do then,giry.watp

Agree9 Disagree8

Well said Ed001

that is the problem up here way to many fans hate other clubs more than they love their own. and that includes some of our own fans as well. there is nothing wrong with hating your biggest rivals its part and parcel of football but when that hatred overshadows your love for your own team it becomes an obsession

Celtic fans need to take a good long look in the mirror they come on here and all over the internet not to mention radio phone ins and blast Rangers for boycotting a game yet not one word of condemnation of the Green Brigade and their boycott of certain home games

double standards me thinks

Lochaber bear {Ed001's Note - I disagree, there is no need for hatred, hatred bring nastiness and trouble with it. People need to grow up and realise it is a game.}

Agree6 Disagree1

Ok Ed maybe hatred is to strong a word in my case i really really really really dont like Celtic FC, Aberdeen FC and St Mirren FC (im originally from greenock lol) But i dont Hate Celtic Supporters (for my sins i can count many of them as good friends lol) im happy to say i dont have any sheep s******s as friends and no St Mirren fans but i neither like them nor hate them its their clubs that i really really dislike

Lochaber Bear {Ed001's Note - it is just the word hate spreads, and kids pick up on it and believe it is meant. The hatred needs to end, then Scottish football can rebuild. Let's face it, the best games I have ever played were against friends, good friends, I wanted to beat them desperately, and then afterwards the banter is great, whether you win or lose. It doesn't lessen the rivalry if you lose the hatred, just changes the way it manifests.}

Agree3 Disagree1

And what about any Rangers fans who do go to the game? Talk about collision course, you celtic lot ought to keep to your own affairs.

Agree2 Disagree1

05 Dec 2012 01:00:17
I assume they will also refuse the 50/50 gate split as they will not be contributing to attendance. Why did the team wi many names enter the competition in the 1st place, I think Greens allocation refusal, and his urge to the support is contrary to the spirit of the game, and the SFA should, without delay, launch them, and give Dundee United a bye to the next round.

Green should again be charged, and prosecuted, this time, for his inflammatory remarks, and disrespect shown to DUFC,, and the whole of Scottish football and tournaments. Coincidently, the boycott, is announced the same day HMRC announce appeal. How's the prospectus doing Chuckles? Have to say your prospects look grim from here! I eagerly await a statement from Scambel Ogilvie regarding this latest outburst from Green. Won't hold my breath though.

Believable16 Unbelievable14

Dundee utd have for years took 300 fans and expected a 50/50 on gate receipts.

Agree6 Disagree6

You have to seriously think about who is wanting to be connected to this shower of a football club and its fans in the form of a company investing in CG's new club! Can't be good for business all this negative and bitterness!

Agree6 Disagree5

One name rangers pal u lot that give us different names.showing the same contempt their chairmen showed for us which as we live in a democracy is our right .ye you would love us to get banned .away and persecute somebody else had enough of your keek

Agree6 Disagree5

Green is only listening to his fans. Is that not what your directors did during the summer. Eh am L wrong.

Agree9 Disagree6

04 Dec 2012 23:58:38
Let's get the game beamed back to Ibrox, we keep our gate, they keep the match gate money. The 7000 they get will be outnumbered by the 20,000 plus that we get.

I have no desire to go to Tannadice ever again, I think they are bang out of order in all sorts of ways, but I actually think it is a good thing as I fear trouble. The feelings are ruNning high and it is still raw. I fear that trouble may happen
and if that happened we would be playing in the East Renfrewshire amateur league.

Believable7 Unbelievable9

Hope Mr green plans to send back tickets for next old firm aswell liewell and Thompson were as bad as each other.

Agree7 Disagree2

Good idea, now how much do the tv rights for the game cost.... what £5 million - yeah right.

think mon!

Agree0 Disagree2

04 Dec 2012 23:51:01
oh and for the dims...testicular fortitued is haw naws...deecee

Believable3 Unbelievable5

04 Dec 2012 23:50:15
well done charlie...takes a lotta testicular fortitued tae make an announcement like that....seems that green is a true blue....plus i have a sneaky feeling there would be a wee bitta agro at that game....just ask the russians....dundee punters have a huge chip on their shooders...always have had...were gonny get gubbed anyhoo....draw at best.....deecee

Believable6 Unbelievable6

 
Change Consent