Rangers Banter Archive May 07 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


07 May 2013 23:12:22
That is it, not renewing my imaginary season ticket and am defo buying nothing to do with Ally! Losers that have won nothing, the parasites drain our club! oops sorry wrong site lol

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Is that meant to be amusing?

Agree0 Disagree0

Well OP, I'm really sorry if that's how you feel Mr Traynor. But I can't help thinking that if you were doing yout job even half as well as Mr McCoist is doing his, there wouldn't be so many beknighted bears wondering what on earth is happening with their beloved football club these days!

Agree0 Disagree0

2, that's the best post yet

Agree0 Disagree0

07 May 2013 20:07:26
Who constitutes the board at the moment?
Exec Directors:
Murray
Mathers
Stockbridge
Jabba?

Non Execs:
Smith
?

Who else?

For the Chairman, CEO and Commercial Director to leave within two weeks is very alarming.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I am also a very worried ST holder. I am not renewing until we are told the TRUTH about what is going on. WW

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont think Traynors on the board. This is alarming news, looks like Green is still pushing the buttons.

Agree0 Disagree0

STV online saying Walter Smith likely to go with M Murray.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm sure Jabba is feeding STV.
Their reporter outside Ibrox, shown online, finishes with Smith likely to go with the Chairman. Heads are rolling.

Where's the accounts? Who owns the assets? How much money in the bank? How much debt? Do these guys know the answers that's why they're getting out?

Officially Ibrox is saying NO COMMENT.

Agree0 Disagree0

@1 normal Tim, glory hunter reply! your club needs sales to survive, so what is the answer, starve the club you love or support it?

Agree0 Disagree0

Well we know already of £5.5 million of debt for the purchase of the new club! What about the debts of the old club? Conveniently forgotten about!
Admin 2 coming your way soon me thinks ;-) maybe could be a new world record couldn't it ;-) 2 admins in 1 year! Maybe pushing pompee for that one!

Agree0 Disagree0

08 May 2013 07:15:21
@5 I'm sorry, but why exactly is it that the club needs sales to survive. let's repeat that, needs sales to survive. Where the f has all the share money gone? Why is our money being spent on crap overpaid players who we don't need? Looks to me like Green has done exactly what he said he was going to do right back at the start, come in, make some cash then p*ss off. In the process he quickly realised that to do that he had to falsely appeal to the 'loyalty' of the fans, ie he played the loyal card and abused our trust. I think @1 represents a growing view that perhaps real loyalty to the club requires more than just pouring our cash in to whoever is able to take it (and let's face it we haven't got a fkn clue who's got what power anymore). Maybe loyalty is looking at the bigger picture and looking to use the fans power in a more productive way than letting people rip the p*ss out of us, like "just tell them its the loyal thing to do and the persons won't be able to say no. " Not buying STs might jeapordise the club, but equally it might make the bloodsuckers think about packing up and leaving us to it.

Agree0 Disagree0

@5 Who are you to tell me that I am starving my club of money. I have been putting plenty in so where is the money going. Too many people putting their hands in the pot and leaving the fans to pick up the pieces. WW

Agree0 Disagree0

07 May 2013 14:50:25
12 10 10 10 with play offs. Thank god after all these months and meetings its sorted. Piss up and brewery spring to mind! PB

Believable0 Unbelievable0

So that's Scottish Football sorted then
Or I'm I missing something here
We've went from a 12 10 10 10 this season to a 12 10 10 10 next year, with the only difference being a play off for the second bottom team in the Spl playing the 2nd 3rd 4th runners up in division 1. Well sure that will have the fans rushing back (NOT). Or is it a case of the 10 clubs in div1 looking after themselves nice wee bit extra cash from the Spl. Sporting Integrity anybody??.

Agree0 Disagree0

Who is going to sponser this stupid setup in scottish football what a shambles

Agree0 Disagree0

Op, you are spot on, a complete mess. They are obviously struggling to get any sponsorship and think irn bru will be the ones. It is beyond belief that after months we get the same as we have with a poxy play off.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ffs regan doncaster go now you clowns

Agree0 Disagree0

I wonder if the spl's stadium standard will come into play for the 3 teams from the 1st div involved in the play off. We've had play offs in Scottish football for a wee while now and suddenly the spl seem to think that this is the saviour along with more money for the 1st div teams.
Watch the ceo's and chairmen congratulate each other on this.
'The Emperor has no clothes!'

Agree0 Disagree0

Just for the record its not league reconstruction if it remains 12-10-10-10.

Agree0 Disagree0

I think this playoff talk is maybe a way of getting to st mirren cause st mirren bust the bubble last time spl hoping st mirren lose in playoff with 2nd 3rd 4th in sfl tmwnn

Agree0 Disagree0

Are they keeping the SPL split? I couldn't find much about that. I really hope not as its utterly useless. Brings nothing to the league what so ever!

Agree0 Disagree0

The proposal is for next season. Who says Saint Mirren will finish 11th AGAIN next season? Saint Mirren are perfectly capable of finishing bottom and getting straight relegation next season!

LLSTMF

Agree0 Disagree0

SPL split - and then playoff

So 2nd bottom gets 3 extra games.

SPL top 3 get at least 3 games in europe.

So all happy. if you about to drop - extrat gaems give boost, if you do drop into SPL2 - then more money there. and quicker route back up.

Top teams helping hand to the minnows.

Agree0 Disagree0

It means faster route back to SPL for RFC - as not top div1 only promoted, playoff allows 2/3/4 if rangers get there thier spending power should ensure spl earlier with safety net if don't win div1

Agree0 Disagree0

07 May 2013 12:07:05
If it was ever in doubt Green is still in charge at Ibrox the vote against Malcolm Murray surely proves it.
There are two people fans trust now, Walter and Ally. Time for them to break the silence and tell fans what they know or are suspicious of. They are both millionaires so if they get sacked they won't starve, but their dignity will be intact. Are these rumours of another administration true?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Strange that when Charles Green was at Ibrox he failed to get rid of Malcolm Murray but now he and Ahmad have gone they've achieved their wish to get rid of him.

Agree Walter really has to speak out now and tell us the truth with absolutely no fudging.

Agree0 Disagree0

Do you not think Ally is a huge part of the problem, he endorsed Green, enjoyed buying penny shares and takes a huge wage for him and his backroom staff to win a Part-Time League! Rangers need at this moment in time. 1. Fan representation on the board. 2. A complete and utter confession to the Fans of what has happened to their Club. 3. A real new beginning where they can be self financing with a strict cost structure in place. 4. Then a true and real rise through the ranks. There are only 2 Clubs in Scotland who can do this and one of them is doing ok.

Agree0 Disagree0

Charles Green may not be CEO, but he is still a director. Smoke and mirrors. Murray has a reputation to protect, and will have wanted to do the right thing w. r. t. independent commission. His ousting is a very very bad sign w. r. t. who is running things at Ibrox, and who they are running things for!

Agree0 Disagree0

@2) fan representation on the board was Malcolm Murray. Lifelong season Ticket holder, Lifelong Fan was how he described himself. A fan as Chairman.

All that's needed is Stockbridge and Mathers to slink away leaving Ally, Walter and Traynor with no cash and a basket case.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't understand why Murray getting a vote of no confidence has anything to do with Green. Green is only a shareholder, he has no say on the board and certainly can't push through his own agenda. Green wanted shot of Murray, now Green is away the rest of the board have voted.

You are taking conspiracy theories too far, it's maybe he is just no good at his job?

Agree0 Disagree0

@4 Yes fair point however real Fan representation is when that fan gives everyone else the information they need to make an informed decision. Malcolm Murray was Charles Greens choice not the fans. A transparent world is needed more now than ever at Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bay bear, I think you are crazy if you think DM will somehow appear to be the saviour. Firstly he couldn't afford to buy anything, secondly the fans would not allow it, thirdly he couldn't wait to sell, why would he come back?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sources state that " It is believed that Mr Green, who quit as chief executive following revelations surrounding his links to Mr Whyte, took part in the board meeting on Monday via a conference call facility"
Green still rules the roost at Ibrox and will until he has fleeced us dry.
Standing down never made him lose any powers, moved his people into his old place, all it done was fool some of our support into believing we were getting our club back from money grabbing scum

Agree0 Disagree0

(5) Green resigned as CEO. But this exit was engineered by him. He's not yet resigned as a director though. Staying on until the end of May. Unfinished business, ye ken?

He is busily engineering an entry for the Krays, sorry I mean Easdales to take over.

Murray has a reputation to protect and wanted to go to the AIM & SFA with independent commissions findings on Green's takeover, and sound the alarm that all is not well with Green, Ahmed and the rest (as per John Brown's predictions).

But CG doesn't want that little piece of prose seeing the light of day, until he has cashed in his chips at the AIM casino, and he is fighting dirty.
Board are backers and placemen, except MUrray who was only brought in to give the flotation a semblance of legitimacy.

Murray won't go down without a fight, and will be honest in his pronouncements, although the bears may not like what he has to say!

Expect story to break on C4 TV news sometime over the next 1-7 days.

Remember : Murray hasn't told a lie yet. If Charles Green caught himself accidentally telling the truth, he'd lie twice over just to keep his hand in.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 May 2013 10:03:01
Just like to say well done to everyone that turned up for the legends match on Monday good to see all the favourites some of them haven't lost it and all for a good cause

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Good night's entertainment & £75,000 raised for charity.

Something everyone can be positive about for a change.

Agree0 Disagree0

#2 Are Unicef and the Rangers Charity Foundation good enough for you?

Or would you like to make more slurs with no evidence to back them up?

Agree0 Disagree0

What was wrong with the charity rangers donated money to last time? How many clubs this season have donated profits from a game to a charitable organisation the way we have?

Agree0 Disagree0

07 May 2013 02:42:11
well done Allan Johnson on winning manager of the year, hardly any money to spend, probably an average gate of 500-600, take notes ally. I don't think its right that you should be wanting to squander more money that the club can't afford or maybe don't have. try doing it the correct way, not the Walter way, spend spend spend.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Totally agree. A manager with a modest budget romps to victory deserves manager of the year over a manager who has 100times the spending power of his opponents, the his fans greet he didn't win the only thing they couldn't buy.

Agree0 Disagree0

Would have been my choice slightly ahead of big Terry and Derek Adams.

Agree0 Disagree0

As a celtic fan. I could not agree more

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm a celtic fan but I say Allan Johnson is a worthy winner of award. some quick figures for you guys to consider though. qots turnover is £700k, wage budget is £350k (based on 20 players/10 that's less than £12k pa). Qots won div 2 by 28 points!

Surely then with a wage budget of just £700k you would be able to romp the league by more than 28 points. what is your wage budget anyway? roughly - £5m? £6m?

Hats off to qots for showing what can be achieved with hard work, good management and a bit of hunger.

Agree0 Disagree0

@4 what's celtics wage budget? Surely you could romp your league by 28 points?

Agree0 Disagree0

I expect queens to be thumped next season it was a 1 season wonder

Agree0 Disagree0

#5 not sure to be honest, but don't know what that's got to do with anything, I would expect with our wage budget to win 33/34 out of 36 games in div2 and would regard anything less as an embarrassment.

The point I am making is, Mccoist and the rangers players, with a wage budget maybe 10x that of qots will be hard pushed to achieve what qots achieved this season.

I'd suggest its going to go a long way to prove that Allan Johnston is a far better manager than ally mccoist.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 May 2013 23:44:57
Rangers hopefull Ins and Outs this summer

Ins-Nicky Clark 150k
Nacho Novo Free
Craig Carthcart 300k
Andy Haliday (Rangers fan check his twitter) 250 k

Outs-Emilson Cribari
Sebastian Faure
The greek
Neil Alexander

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Why would 'Rangers fan' be important? People need to leave before any come in.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would we be paying for players when we are under a transfer embargo? we can only sign out of contract players

Agree0 Disagree0

OP, you seem to forget that 3 of your 'outs' are on long contracts. Can't see anyone coming in to buy them. Even if there were clubs interested, they probably would not be offering the wages these guys are on already so they are hardly likely to move. It will cost to rip up their contracts and do the club have the money to do this?
Al

Agree0 Disagree0

If you sign players under a certain age you might still have to offer compensation to the developing club. Not sure if Nicky Clark falls into that catagory, pretty sure Chris Cathcart does not.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent