13 Nov 2017 18:05:20
Scenario 1: We appoint McInnes before double header with Aberdeen he loses both games or doesn't do well and puts himself under immediate pressure.
Scenario 2: We appoint someone else before Aberdeen double header and they lose both games putting themselves under immediate pressure and causing people to shout we should have gone for McInnes.
Granted both of these scenarios are on the basis we don't win both games in the double header but this is the risk for the board and the reason I believe no decision will be announced until after these games.
13 Nov 2017 18:28:10
That’s an excellent couple of points and very plausible. On the other hand win both games and the manager will be hailed a hero
13 Nov 2017 21:18:12
An excellent couple of points? Really? Oh aye the board are thinking . let’s not appoint the new manager until after the 2 Aberdeen games just incase the new manager loses them both and everyone wants him immediately sacked . Pure mince
13 Nov 2017 21:35:00
Surely McInnes would be the best person to know how to beat his own team?
13 Nov 2017 22:12:08
scenario 3- we don't get anyone in, lose both and the fans go daft for the board taking too long 😂😂
14 Nov 2017 01:43:22
Or maybe the board are just doing the sensible thing and trying to get the best quality possible for a manager and whenever it happens, it happens.
14 Nov 2017 07:29:23
Scenario 4 - Rangers beat Aberdeen home and away with Murty still in charge and Derek McInnes is no longer considered for the vacancy.
14 nov 2017 12:47:39
scenario 5 we appoint mcinnes and win both games and challange for the title lol