Rangers Rumours Archive December 20 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


20 Dec 2011 23:22:58
Scottish clubs to study draft on league reform. Source BBC Sport


MainStandBear!

Believable15 Unbelievable7

20 Dec 2011 21:52:27
Wolves close to signing eggert jonsson they have already agreed a fee according to stv

Believable17 Unbelievable2

Who cares? Is he a rangers play....no?


MainStandBear!

Agree0 Disagree0

No but some1 put on this site that they spoke to him or something and he said he was coming to rangers with other hearts and i was just leting my fellow bears know if thats ok with you mainstandbear

THEBIGBEAR LEE

Agree0 Disagree0

Eggert Jonsson is close to Wolves move

sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/hearts/289525-hearts-eggert-jonsson-in-wolves-signing-talks/

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 18:55:15
Just listening to radio Clyde and Mark guidi/ darrel king said it's just a rumour but there could be a settlement between rangers / taxman in the region of 10/15 million

Believable36 Unbelievable18

Really doubt it

Agree0 Disagree0

Yup, sounds a done deal, sell big Jela, pay the first instalment and let's crack on. Let's also ship out the pish in our squad and go with youth, padded with Templeton from Hearts and the wee man from St Johnstone (Davidson), perhaps a wee six month deal for Boydy, to replace Jela in the short term?

Agree0 Disagree0

How deluded are yous lot/??/the very most will be 8million,and thats pushing it,yeh the guys got talent,but 1 lazy boyd in him,when games not in gers favour,and for the taxman.lmao.hes still seething,at u lot buying big jelly for 4.4million,when owed,the small debt ,at the time ,for 2.8milion,tut tut,which has now risen too about 5 million,paye yer way.yet u lot,still aint seeing whats staring yous in the face....yer whyte knight,will w8 till jan sales,make few bob for himelf,and dissolve and bury rfc

Agree0 Disagree0

Considering the tax man has written off 25 billion last year in corporate tax I dont see why not... CheltBlue

Agree0 Disagree0

..How deluded are we?...you want to read that post back to yourself and then look up the defenition of "deluded" lolz..

Agree0 Disagree0

Little chance of a deal being done,thats why whyte went to london for corporate sympathy.all the non payments will work against him.the taxman is raging with him i know this 4 a fact.not 49 but nearer 32million

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry guys i work for centre 1 well up!
It is common know rangers f.c are to lose this case for about the 40million mark but maybe our only way forward is admin and given a couple of seasons we will be back. whyte is not going to be the knight we want in the longoing run if you trace his career back you will see not much gets paid by that man but only Tim will tell? W.a.t.p

Agree0 Disagree0

Think Guidi and King have it spot on. Think about it sensibily. Say Gers owe £50m ( for talking sake). Gers turn round and say we cannae afford pay it, best we can do is pay our creditors 10p in the pound. So HMRC are left with getting £5m and anyone else thats owed cash gets a fraction of what they are owed. OR does Whyte turn round to HMRC and cut a deal that sees the tax man get £15 - £20m and avoid the club going into administration ? Therefore HMRC instead of getting only £5m he gets £15m - £20, since there is no way he is gonna get his £50m. So HMRC bites the bullet and takes a £30-£35m hit instead of a £45m hit. Makes a wee bit of sense.

Agree0 Disagree0

To the poster who alleges they work for Centre 1. You are either a very stupid civil servant or you are talking absolute rubbish. For the record, I do work for HM government and if I knew for sure anything about the ongoing discussions between Rangers FC and HMRC, and then posted about it on here, I would be on a disciplinary and looking at being dismissed. The facts are: we don't know exactly what is happening. Craig Whyte will have at least two short to medium term plans for us. One may involve administration, the other may involve a negotiated smaller settlement and the club running on a very small and tight budget. I do not think Craig Whyte will be in the helm long term, but I do think that he will guide us through this difficult period in our history, before accepting an offer from another individual/consortium for controlling interest in the club.
P.S. still no official interest from any clubs regarding Jelavic, but as an update to the post I made regarding Goian a couple of weeks ago: A struggling EPL club did enquire about his availability to his agent, which then got back to Ibrox. This led to Rangers entering into negotiations into trying to extend his contract. That is all I have on that one at the moment though.

Agree0 Disagree0

1 rangers have not been found guilty yet so why are they talking about fines 2rangers have nothing to do with the case (it mih lawyers part of whyte deal was he couldnt even comment on it apart from we think we can win it)3why if guilty would hmrc accept a fifth or quarter of the total bill,we have ibrox murray park,players who all could be sold to get the total amount of money out of us(unless mr whyte has already done a deal with him being 1st preformace)we are in big trouble dont listen to the so called scottish media drip feeding us little titbit of bad news then some good news lafferty edu to sign new contracts,we dont need to sell all great work from jack irvine and rangers media-imagine one think if the team from the east cound not get their accounts signed off and didnt hold a AGM what the same reporters be so silent-beware of this whyte xmas bears

Agree0 Disagree0

Wake up bears! this is all spin heading to transfer window to make sure any predators think we dont need money.google rangers tax case blogger got proof n very well informed,i hav never fancied whyte and think dm has pretty much shafted him and gers.admin is probable outcome with at least two players out.listen to walters quotes n read between the lines.whyte thought a share issue wz viable but dismal failure of last try still haunts us

Agree0 Disagree0

I have told you all for months the tax bill will be settled for 8.1 million. if you need to hear it from a loser on clyde one to believe it why come on here?
the tiger - still beyond reproach

Agree0 Disagree0

This rumour does make sense when Goldman Sachs got away with a 9 million fine watch out Arsenal are next as they have been doing the same

Agree0 Disagree0

Arsenal have already settled out of court, a few years back!

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 18:50:21
rumblings at ibrox suggest rangers are on the verge of agreeing to pay up between 10-15million to the taxman and not the 49m that was rumoured. (darrell king-clyde1). should all be sorted in coming weeks!

Believable30 Unbelievable22

My pal just texted me also with the same thing hope its true 15mil is manageable an no point deduction

Agree0 Disagree0

If you cant pay the 2.8m tax bill wheres the money for 15m! Spoon fed idiots!

Agree0 Disagree0

It wasn't the 2.8 million we were disputing it was the penalty imposed 1+ million

Agree0 Disagree0

Must be true if the rangers cheerleader says it

Agree0 Disagree0

Lol well you cant pay the penalty then. Dear me your not the brightest lot are you.

Agree0 Disagree0

We can pay it no bother we will get 10m for winning the leauge this season as we go straight into the cl proper, plus whyte has money he is just not daft enough to spend it before he finds out the decision on this tax p!sh, wot will the manky mob talk about now eh?4iar *ksd* {Ed014's Note - 1st and 2nd place in the league enter the Champions League at the 3rd qualifying stage.There is no guaranteed entry.

Agree0 Disagree0

You can tell a desperate man anything and he will believe it! Look at the clues ya fool! Money being ring fenced by judges for ex employees . Taken to court for not paying bills on time. Tax bills and penaltys being disputed... Need i go on? Yeah yeah craig whyte knows what hes doing deluded fools!

Agree0 Disagree0

Ito belive that we go strait in to the champs l proper because the co eff works a year or so behind, its not untill end of next season we hav tae play 3 qualifiers ballingrybear {Ed014's Note - This has been covered before.

Agree0 Disagree0

Tax bill will be around 35 million letters from murray to players prove tax avoidance.4get templeton hes a tim n heading to england if not celtic romanov wants 3 million lennon wont pay that

Agree0 Disagree0

...£35 million....sounds like turkish delight to me mate.....pure guess work from a clueless tim....

Agree0 Disagree0

35 million would be a result m8!listening to tabloid reporters hz put the blinkers on a lot of us,rfc tax case blog is worth reading as hes got proof in black n white,its all on public record but tabloids fear bklash frm bears if negative headlines are published.no conspiracy here jst facts.we are being told lies about the severity of the problem n its time to wake up {Ed001's Note - if this tax case blog has proof in black and white, where is it? Because there is certainly none on the site.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed001,go bk on all posts and financials are there.he also xplains how figures hav been massaged to show healthier numbers also a good article about how money hznt been paid to vat,national ins or income tax from wages.cancelling agm should hav set alarm bells ringing {Ed001's Note - none of that is proof. You said proof.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Edoo1.i think ur being a bit pedantic re rfc tax case.its immposible to prove anything unless you are whyte himself.put it this way;in my opinion it all looks a bit shady when you couple it with whytes previous buisness dealings.would you agree there seems to be a hand to mouth look with debt? {Ed001's Note - no, because, like the guy who does the blog, I do not have open access to Rangers accounts, nor do I have access to Whyte's full financial records. I think you are just trying to squirm out of your own words, regarding proof in black and white, when all you have is a blog by some nameless individual. That is not proof, that is hearsay, maybe even misinformation, possibly truth, definitely rumour. But it is a long way from any kind of proof.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Edoo1.see your point but how do you xplain agm postponment? the fact some finances were frozen means somebdy saw the books n decided they didnt look gr8 not heresay facts {Ed001's Note - not at all, I don't explain the AGM postponement, simply because I don't know the reasons for it. You on the other hand are using hearsay and assuming it is a bad thing, it may well be a bad thing, but you don't know it is. Sometimes it can be simply a case of a report being unfinished or a personal dispute between board members or numerous other reasons why they can be postponed. People just need to calm down and wait and see, rather than jumping to conclusions. The only fact you have produced is that the AGM has been postponed, everything else is pure assumption based on a blog that you have no idea as to the veracity of.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I thought the tax case against was removed from Centre one sometime ago and the case was taken up by the Edinburgh office

Agree0 Disagree0

@ Ed001, you are absolutely spot on. The blog posts are nameless and could easily be used to promote negativity towards anyone remotely interested in trying to carry Rangers through their current problems. I have read same blog posts and came to the same conclusion as yourself: there is no proof on there. If anything which could predjudice the outcome of any case between Rangers v HMRC was made public prior to any decision being made, then the whole case could be thrown out. The only people who really know, are those involved and I doubt they would be stupid enough to jeapordise their entire carreer by posting on a blog which is now common knowledge. I have no doubt that there are plans in place for all scenarios. As for the AGM: no laws have been broken. Any people on here who post that they know what is happening regards Rangers v HMRC is talking rubbish and those posts should be treated as such. {Ed001's Note - I agree, the only thing that can be done is to wait and see, then deal with the situation afterwards. Whyte might turn out to be a shining knight or a shyster, but only time will tell on that. Impossible to judge him on his business record, purely because that was business, who knows if he views this as business or if he truly loves Rangers? Or he could go in with good intentions and be swept along like happened at Leeds. This is an emotive business, football is not the same as any other, you just can't tell what will happen 99% of the time.}

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 18:42:35
with the old transfer rumours starting again - av been speaking to my good friend at McDiarmid Park about whos in and out - and with Lomas saying he wants to bring in some new faces he is looking at bringing John Fleck on Loan along with Salim Kerkar plus £500,000 (original offer) for Central Midfielder Murray Davidson.

in other news - there will be no Hearts players joining Rangers come January as all payments will be made come the end of this month - Jelavic will not be leaving as financially it doesnt make sense - with the Euros just round the corner Whyte will wait till at least then to see if his valuation increases and then sell him -Along with Davis and Edu. Whyte will be looking to the future looking to bring in Allan, Hateley and Davidson along with the new Nambian under 19s player - building his team around Kyle Hutton and Jamie Ness

Believable8 Unbelievable27

Nonsense!if whyte spends money b4 tax issue sorted they will hammer him 4 it and want all the money paid immediatly then the fire sale starts

Agree0 Disagree0

Complete and utter poppy c@ck, get a life man !! FFS Total GARBAGE.......

Agree0 Disagree0

When did Whyte become the manager? It aint Hearts pal

Agree0 Disagree0

Pash Rangers build their team around kyle hutton?.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hearts players will put a complaint to SFA/SPL if they don't get paid and may invoke Fifa legislation allowing them to terminate a contract “with just cause"

So they can essentially walk away (This is highly doubtful to happen as am sure it would involve a lengthy court case)

Rangers are certainly looking to the future now, but need to keep the balance of on field success and drip feeding young players like bendicksen, wylde perry, hutton, hemmings, and Ness in with experienced players. I honestly think the only one to go in January will be big Jelavic - big as good as he is, if we continue to play with one guy up front then he wont be a great loss (OMG Wait for the big online scrap)

The guy needs naismith to do the dirty work, and without him, or someone similar he will struggle to find the net.

Rikkisixx

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 17:25:16
Rangers are trying to bring in Nathan Delfouneso from Villa in January.

Believable4 Unbelievable36

Is that right aye, the guy who has very nearly sealed a loan deal to Bristol??

Agree0 Disagree0

He's just signed an extended contract with Villa until 2014 so I think you'll have to do better.

Agree0 Disagree0

He's just signed an extended contract with Villa until 2014 so I think you'll have to do better.

so does that mean we wont be selling mcgregor, davis, whittaker etc etc etc if an offer comes in, i mean they just signed extended deals so that means they cant be sold lol what a load of p**h u talk m8

Agree0 Disagree0

You've just posted that because you saw him on tv on sunday which is a rare sight and you also like his hair.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 15:07:51
KRIS BOYD will not be returning to Rangers after ending his unhappy spell in Turkey.
(evening times)- thank god, he's a total diddy!

Believable21 Unbelievable25

Oh shut up ... who cares if he didn't score a shed load away from gers fact is he scored and he scored consistently for us

torres currently has this problem .... no one is saying he is a diddy in fact teams are lining up hoping for his signature..

if you ask me kris boyd would be welcome back any day of the week .... he scores he scores and he scores some more in a gers shirt...

Agree0 Disagree0

First you lot say he was better than larsson, now hes the same as torres. lmao

Agree0 Disagree0

Nobody said he was better than larsson, and stop twistin words, torres is an example of how even the best players have bad spells

Agree0 Disagree0

Well he was better than larsson, because he scored more goal than him, simples!

Agree0 Disagree0

He has played 78 mins since moving to turkey which is no surprise because he is absolutely useless. he cant run, control, pass, dribble. and this nonsense about his goals against spl teams excluding celtic, chances are created for him as rangers have better players than the likes of st mirren. how did he fair in europe or against celtic for instance. and to mention boyd in the same sentence as torres is simply laughable!

Agree0 Disagree0

Hooper has more goals than jelavic does that means hes better

Agree0 Disagree0

He stunk cant beleive mcleish was going to pay 4 million for him (oh aye thats right its cos hes a s**te manager) as the villla fans are finding out)

Agree0 Disagree0

Kris Boyd would disrupt the dressing room again, so no no no. If anything our priority should be a creative midfielder, because with Davis out of form, and Naismith out we are not getting enough quality balls into Jella. Lafferty and Aluko will make a big difference now their back, but a wee bit more quality in midfield will do. plus a nippy striker.

Agree0 Disagree0

2006–2010 Rangers 143 games 101 goals not a bad return... i think people are stupid to claim he is better than Larsson as he clearly isnt but he is more prolific - as for the "he cant run, control,pass, dribble" comment... who cares? he is a goal scorer... hes there to score goals and thats what he did - he was lazy and could do nothing for 89 mins and still score the winner... reminds me of a certain Ally McCoist (and before any dafties pipe up, am not saying hes as good as McCoist, i am saying he is a similar type of player. he knows his abilities and thats to score goals) Andrei Schvenchenko was a world class player yet couldnt score in the premier league because he wasnt suited for it... just like Boyd isnt for Turkey. SPL is his level- if someone guaranteed you 20+ a season you'd bite his hand off. Boyd back anyday

Agree0 Disagree0

He only scored more than larsson because of the amount of pens rangers get

Agree0 Disagree0

Can we lay the Boyd Larsson thing to rest? It seems to be a common misconception that Boyd scored more league goals in Scotland than Larsson. This is just not true. He scored more SPL goals because all his tome in Scotland wad in the SPL era. Larsson scored more league goals including the pre SPL era in which he played. Boyd (Killie and gers) 164 goals in 296 Scottish league games. This is a strike rate of 55%. Larsson 174 goals in 221 Scottish league games. Strike rate 79%. Jhimbo.

Agree0 Disagree0

Think if youy check records Celtic have the all time record of most penalties given and the least given against, so shut up.

Agree0 Disagree0

To even mention boyd in the same line as larsson is shocking boyd isntgood enough to tie his laces larsson was the best player ever to walk on scottissh pitches fact

Agree0 Disagree0

Two words for u timmy. gazza and laudrup were better than larsson! why do these timothys come on here. get a life and retreat to the losers website

Agree0 Disagree0

Very difficult to compare players such as gazza laudrup larsson mccoist. different positions and different types of players.

Agree0 Disagree0

Regardless of what position or type of players they were, gazza and laudrup were better players. simple as that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Jesus we gave David Healy a deal so why not Boyd the man scored goals for fun in the SPl, I would take him back so he could pick up from where he left off!
He is a penalty box striker, he is not a Midfielder or a winger or anything else so the fact he can't run, pass, tackle means nothing, his jib was to score goals which he did and it won us league titles! Come home Kris!

Agree0 Disagree0

The post saying Boyd's strike rate was 55%, not really a fair point considering much of the time was spent at Kilmarnock where chances were harder to come by, where as Larsson spent all seven of his years in Scotland with a team that were pushing for the league every year were chances were frequent.

That said, Larsson still has a better strike percentage even if you only take Boyd's time at Rangers. Boyd scored 101 goals in 144 league games for Rangers - which is a 70% hit rate. Larsson as you said had a phenomenal 79% hit rate. I do not think any right minded Gers fan would ever pick Boyd ahead of Larsson if they had to pick one to be in their starting eleven though, so to be honest I think the debate is a little silly. Both were great goal scorers, Larsson was a better player.

However he was not on the level of Gazza or Laudrup - he was just here longer in my view.

However, taking the Larsson v Boyd debate out of this and thinking rationally, I cannot see why we would not sign Boyd. A 70% hit rate seems mad to not bring in if his wage demands are not ridiculous.

Well worth a punt, and better him on the bench than Healy.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 12:55:51
Boyd who is heading back to the UK will now be able to sign for another club in next month's transfer window . But Rangers sources last night insisted there was " no truth " in stories that manager Ally McCoist wanted him back to bolster his squad for the Title run-in.

It's thought however that high flying Championship side Cardiff which already boasts Kenny Miller could be interested in striking a deal which would re-unite the goal-grabber with his former Ibrox strike partner.

EXPRESS

Blue bells are blue

Believable27 Unbelievable5

Boyd's contract is terminated which means he can sign immediately for anyone does not need to wait till jan

Agree0 Disagree0

Maybe if Boyd goes to Cardiff we could go for Kenny millar

Agree0 Disagree0

Think cardiff would want to pair them up. I know boydy scored goals for fun at Rangers but how many goals did he score in big games. Against timmy or european games?. He can't replace Jelavic for skill but he would for sure score us goals.

CJM

Agree0 Disagree0

The very fact that there is an argument whether or not rangers should sign boyd just sums up the state that my beloved club are in. i thought it couldnt get any worse after hearing ally wants to give lafferty and edu new deals. oh how the mighty have fallen!

Agree0 Disagree0

Above poster you are 100 per cent correct

Agree0 Disagree0

"how the mighty have fallen"..in case you,ve not noticed its not just the mighty thats fallen, the whole of Scottish football is skint...we cant compete even for championship players anymore...if we dont make the champions league it sets us back years...winning the spl pays peanuts anaw...now Kris Boyd top goal scorer in the spl ..ever...for next to nothing till the end of the season..you,d have to be a complete ejit to say naw to that eh...Big Dee..

Agree0 Disagree0

Regardless of the state the club and scottish football is in, rangers should be bringing in players better than boyd, ortiz, bedoya, healy etc etc!

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree with the fan above. The Rangers squad contains the following sh*t players: Broadfoot, Ortiz, Edu, McKay, Bedoya, Fleck, McCulloch, Kerkar, Healy (is that enough yet?). That represents about 40% of our current first team squad. Get these chancers out of our club and replace them with quality youngsters and a few well placed cost effective signings (money permitting). McCoist has had a hard job to manage but really he should nae be having to deal with the pish above....

Agree0 Disagree0

Totally agree with the above post. far too many passengers onboard who offer the team absolutely nothing. you must wonder what possessed the scouts at rangers to bring in the likes of bedoya , mckay and ortiz etc!

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 10:18:32
McCoist to try n Lure Kris Boyd back to Ibrox .
Driver Rumours could be correct as he submits Transfer Request and Rangers rumoured to be Interetsted in the Midfielder .

Another Rumour Saldago to join Gers for Rest of season in Jan ( This one i not keen on )

Believable3 Unbelievable13

Salgado source?

Agree0 Disagree0

Salgado would be more reliable than whittaker at right back.

Agree0 Disagree0

Now source just run of the Mill Rumours . Read the post buddy RUMOURS .

Agree0 Disagree0

Salgado or wittaker easy wittaker wouldna get s game wa Whitburn juniors

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 02:06:39
I know a few people inside hearts and although Andy Driver has refused to play under Paulo Sergio, he will sign a 1 year contract extension.

Because he has been out with injury he needs to raise his fitness levels again and hearts have agreed that he will be loaned out for the season to train and work on his fitness, the club he will be loaned to, as of yet unknown.

He will then be sold on at a price after his loan deal has come to an end, therefore, any rumours that driver could be on his way to us as a free agent, are false.

Rangers are also red hot favourites to secure the signature of Scott Allan.

CBear

Believable8 Unbelievable11

Isnt he running out of contract? if he sings an extension and then goes on loan surely at the end of the loan he is a free agent?

Agree0 Disagree0

He has 1 year remaining, so he will sign an extra year to leave him with 2, go out on loan for 1, come back be sold at a price, hearts and driver gain money from a transfer fee, everyone is a winner.

CBear

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent