Rangers Rumours Archive June 03 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


03 Jun 2012 13:48:41
Theirs a pub rumour that a players agent is arguing he can go for free cause his original contract has all his add ins and bonuses, including for European football and since out of Europe he can't deliver his payments. Argument he delivered SPL second place and Europe but Rangers board got team banned by going into admin Hence contract voed can leave for free.

Believable52 Unbelievable41

If this is the case, then I would imagine a lot of the squad had the same clauses in their contracts........OUCH!

Leeroy

Agree0 Disagree0

Very interesting if true. There is a contractual law which stipulates something about the contract having to be achievable. If the contract cannot be achieved it may be nulled.?? It's all about money. Agents get big money on transfers. The more transfers an agent handles the more income he gets. Agents like their clients to move every two years.

Agree0 Disagree0

Contracts are 2 way streets and unless the wording is watertight any player wanting to leave might have to pay off the remainder of their contract the wording in the press was they reverted back to their ORIGINAL contracts as soon as their pay went to normal rate

Agree0 Disagree0

Depends on the individual contracts and the precise wording of the articles.
Could be true/ possible.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why should players suffer more financial loss because of the board? They delivered Europe this year even on 25% wages.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is a clear case of rangers football club failing the player with circumstances beyond his control.
I doubt he can walk for free but he can sue rangers for demonstrable financial loss.

Agree0 Disagree0

Biggest problem may be the continued involvement of CW as he is still the major shareholder. I seem to remember that he had to be removed or players could leave for nothing. This has not happened yet.

Agree0 Disagree0

If correct wonder who the player is, of course it's his agents strategy, but sounds like he's got somewhere else lined up.

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm finding it hard to see how this would work, not dismissing it out of hand but I've got a question that maybe someone can clear up. Surely if this is the case then players could also invoke this if they simply weren't selected in the team for a European fixture because regardless of whether we are banned from Europe or not, a player is not guaranteed that he is going to start a European fixture and earn this bonus, hence it is a bonus payment and not part of their actual salary. I imagine said player's contract would have to have had some clause stipulating that they were guaranteed to appear in every European fixture which seems highly irregular to me but as I said maybe someone can shed some light on it?

Agree0 Disagree0

You're spot on about the players being able to leave for free if CW is still involved. Paul Clark the administrator admitted this to the media.

http://m.stv.tv/sport/football/clubs/rangers/300382-rangers-administrator-admits-craig-whyte-clause-exists/

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers should be suing the players for not qualifying for either European competition this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

They all have the Whyte claws sorry clause in their contracts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers should sue the players - Send some of what you're smoking. The players qualified for Europe it was the club that did not. They should be playing in the champion's league but due to CW SDM & D & P they cannot do this. - Jaxie

Agree0 Disagree0

Clubs have to qualify and we didnt end ofstory

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 12:53:48
Newco, third devision, start again, Its the only way.

Wibblyblue.

Believable87 Unbelievable23

I totally agree. Third Division and promotion each season? It is the only way to regain any dignity from this sorrowful legacy which David Murray has lumbered us with! Why has Murray not been called to account or is this being saved for a future date ? By dropping to the third division voluntarily it will save the s**ts in the SPL any more angst. It will also put money into the game at a level which deserves and needs it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would your 18year olds achieve automatic promotion in year 1? Once you are down your gates will tumble - but Ibrox overheads will not (unless you close three stands) income down -- no money for transfer fees or high wages or hope of Europe. How do you attract talent? Thistle will be a more attractive proposition.

Agree0 Disagree0

"Once you are down your gates will tumble - but Ibrox overheads will not (unless you close three stands)"

I agree with going down the 3rd division and I'd gladly still pay for my 3 season tickets prices at todays prices until we're back. If all Rangers fans do the same how will our attendances go down? The True Rangers fans will make a stand and support them. I hear season tickets are down over on the east side, whats up with that lot lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

So even 3rd division doesn"t suit some people
the bloodlust continues!

bil72

Agree0 Disagree0

This suits me as a Celtic fan, I dont want rangers to die. However i dont think they can just come back into the SPL, The first year might be a bit boring but i think excitement would grow as rangers gain successive promotions back. More importantly though if you do take this option every trophy you win when back in the SPL will be viewed as legitimate and valid. This would not be the case with newco in the SPL they would be viewed as tainted through special treatment. I will look forward to the return of the derby games

Agree0 Disagree0

You know as a celtic fan i can honestly say that if Rangers were to go by choice to division 3 and start again (hence doing the time for the crimes) they would be doing the dignified thing and your team and you as fans (not that you have done a thing wrong) could hold your head up and say they have serve they're punishment and that would put it to bed. Otherwise Rangers will keep taking a kicking from all directions over the way they have acted as a club. It is like the OP says the only way. I for one grudgingly admit the SPL (as a spectacle) will be a lot worse off without you. But the rest of the SPL could survive (just about) for 3 years till you are back in the top division. 1 or 2 would desperately struggle but most would just have to cut they're cloth accordingly, remember without rangers they get a bigger slice of the pie. Celtic without rangers would walk to the next 3 titles and without the challenge they wouldnt have to strengthen the side. Being careful along the way not to chase european glory too vigorously (David Murray style) notice the lack of "Sir".

Agree0 Disagree0

Agreed

Troobloo

Agree0 Disagree0

I have Being saying this since Feb, let's go to the 3rd maybe not get full house at ibrox but all 3rd div teams would make much more money and would surely raise there game , gers youths would be given there chance,keep/ gel them together make this a 5 year plan but could be done with in 3 years , still get a run in the cup and a poss old firm game

Agree0 Disagree0

Who says rangers would win 3 divisions one after the other? they have no god given right to win any of them and crowds would be down to the pre murray/souness era as all the glory seeking fans would not go to games against east stirling etc.

Agree0 Disagree0

That's why above says 5 year plan but could be done 3? Which leaves 2 years doh

Agree0 Disagree0

Correct me if I'm wrong. I've been out of Scotland for sometime. Does the winners of the Scottish cup still get a european place in Scotland because if this is the case. Rangers could still get european football by moving down to the third division. Give all the players a large bonus for getting into europe would mean they had to win the cup. This would keep the fans going to Ibrox, allow rangers to pay for their crimes. We could then sell our own tv rights while in the lower leagues giving us a good income plus the extra money from europe. Just a thought, as I said I'm not sur eif the cup winners still get a spot

Agree0 Disagree0

The only crimes we have done is not paying our way witch was a fine.So what crimes are we doing for going to div 3 we have not been found guilty of anything yet so i think your jumping the gun.We would go to div 3 to sort ourselves out ya dohball

Agree0 Disagree0

I think 3rd division is a fair punishment, but the fans wont get a choice as its all money driven,just like we didnt choice to cheat we put our trust in mr murray and well the less cw is mentioned the better, but he still has something over us.
put it too the fans for a vote and if it meant our team surviving then whether it's 3 or 33years it doesnt matter as long as rangers survive the fans would vote 3rd division

Agree0 Disagree0

A new co will be banned from Europe for 3 years so even winning the Cup won't get us european football.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers fans wanting to start in the 3rd Division is madness, if we can get the CVA agreed then it should be business as usual. All this sporting integrity guff from other clubs is just an excuse. There is a clean bigoted agenda against Rangers in this country. Without Rangers Scottish football will rapidly drop to an even lower level, no TV deal, sponsors will pull out and attendances at Parkhead will drop dramatically as they will be watching a 1 horse race every season.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 11:47:23
Hi to everyone. First of all, I hope nobody feels insulted by me being here, but I'm an Everton fan. I don't mean any disrespect, I have a lot of respect for Rangers and the fans. If any club should respect another in a tough time, it’s Everton. I just wanted to know what the Naismith to Everton news/rumour is looking like on that side. He is a great player, as is Jelavic, and I’d love to have him in a Blue jersey too. So just wanted to know of any news, I don’t mean any disrespect at all. Good luck to Rangers, they’ll make it through this tough time I’m sure of it!

Steve EFC {Ed039's Note - He has had a couple of bad injuries mate but he is a cracking player when he is on song. He is available at a knock down price and that would suit Everton and like you said Jelavic has been speaking him upto Moyes but the only team so far to firm up a bid for him was West Brom, maybe Moyes needs to move players on before he has any money to spend)

Believable9 Unbelievable20

Hi Everton fan. You've had some great players from Rangers down the years.
Will keep watch Jelavic next year to see howmany he scores. {Ed039's Note - He has done better than I even thought he would do and actually proven he can cut it at a higher level)

Agree0 Disagree0

Celtic fan here,because you evertonians think you play in a superior league dont think you cant get quality up here.naismith is a dirty little cheat... but before you give me dogs abuse a think he is a smashing player ,if i would compare him to any one down the road when fit, better than,dirk kuyt by a distance. {Ed039's Note - I am a Rangers fan and I think he is a diver and moaner but thats what makes him the player he is, just like guys like Rooney etc have their traits that I believe if you remove them make them less of a player)

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with Ed039 And to mr no name Celtic fan I'm pretty sure poooper likes a wee dive too but like Ed039 said its a trait that makes him the player he is. A trait that makes both players dangerous in my opinion and before anyone starts the vs crap, both above mentioned players are better than spl

Leeroy

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks everyone! And to the Celtic fan, Evertonians definitely don't discount talent in the Scottish league. Jelavic, Arteta and of course Big Duncan Ferguson were all in the SPL at one point....all at Rangers unless I'm mistaken

Steve EFC

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh and I definitely think Jelavic can get 20+ goals next season.....should be enough to outscore Donkey Carroll by about, say, 20? :P

Steve EFC

Agree0 Disagree0

Well in evertonian, they all played for rangers 2 of them they couldnt afford the other they never payed for,sure you have to laugh,

Agree0 Disagree0

Some of us older guys remember Alec Scott going to Everton in the 60's.

Agree0 Disagree0

Gazza, cleland ,weir, steven ,stevens, gough , mccall we have a good relation with the toffees .hope you do well this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

He's a cracking player, on song he makes Rangers tick. Hopefully he will come back the same player after another serious injury. As for Jelavic I wouldn't expect him to be at Everton after the Euro's. No disrespect to Everton but much bigger clubs will be circling after his great half season at the Toffee's. {Ed039's Note - Already teams rumoured to be watching him, but he is not a first pick for Croatia, I know Eduardo is but someone plays off him like Olic or someone like that)

Agree0 Disagree0

Good point ed but Olic is now out injured and will miss the Euro's. I'd imagine that should free up a place for Jelavic. Can't think of any other strikers off hand that are better than him in the Croatia squad. {Ed039's Note - Mandzukic is usually a pick for them, but didnt know Olic was injured so there is a space up for grabs I suppose)

Agree0 Disagree0

Forgot to add I hope someone was bright enough to put a sell on clause in Jelavic's contract when he left. Everton got him for buttons. Must be worth treble what they paid for him already. {Ed039's Note - My understanding is that there is nothing like that in the agreement)

Agree0 Disagree0

I wonder if Rapid Vienna had a sell on clause in his contract when they sold him to rangers.
67coatbridge

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 11:21:27
Rangers in crisis: FIFA order SFA to get tough with Ibrox club over appeal panel D-Day

The SFA have been told there will be trouble if their appeals tribunal fails to come down hard on Rangers this Friday.
All the panel have to consider is a punishment to replace the 12-month transfer embargo they originally issued after it was declared outwith their remit by Lord Glennie's Court of Session ruling.
But SFA chief Stewart Regan, according to MailSport sources, has come under heavy pressure from FIFA to insist that the sanction now levied must be of equal or greater weight to the original.
That will be communicated to the panel and it's also understood Gers' owner-in-waiting Charles Green has already been made aware of the grave danger administrators Duff and Phelps have put the club in by taking the case to court.
FIFA take a dim view of clubs tackling their national associations in court and could even kick our sides out of Europe and Scotland out of the World Cup qualifiers if Gers aren't punished appropriately.
It is also believed there will be no compromise agreement so Rangers will either have to accept the original verdict, which is now unlikely, or stand by the tribunal's new ruling.
The Hampden hierarchy won't convene with all parties until Wednesday to discuss the case.
And it's believed they have put their tribunal members on standby to clear their diaries for a Friday night session, with the Thursday expected to be too soon to sort the formalities.
The panel have yet to receive Glennie's written judgment on the ban.
And with the extended Jubilee holidays bringing administration to a halt, the midweek meeting will be their first chance to discuss the format the appeal has to take.
It's believed the original three members of the appellate tribunal - Lord Carloway, Allan Cowan and Craig Graham - will all sit again, as per Glennie's instructions.
However, it's unclear whether Rangers will be invited to take part in proceedings, with the facts of the case already known and uncontested by their QC Richard Keen.
The difficulties facing the tribunal are enormous. And despite Lord Glennie insisting they have to choose a sanction from the list in black and white in the SFA statutes, they still face several grey areas.
With a ban from the Scottish Cup the closest punishment on the 'light' side of the embargo, and suspension from the SFA the next step up on the other, these are the two most likely outcomes.

Believable27 Unbelievable7

Please......don't believe a word the DR says.

TTG {Ed039's Note - Well said)

Agree0 Disagree0

It has to be suspension. A ban in the Scottish cup is nothing. The club went out the club early last season, about ten notches lighter than a one year transfer ban.

Agree0 Disagree0

They need a harsher punishment than the original light punishment of a transfer ban. For premeditated planned withholding of NI, vat and PAYE payments made by staff to the tune of £15m giving them advantage in the SPL to deliver second place to the detriment of other teams.
Lord Carloway needs to uphold the integrity of the panel and the integrity of the SFA governance system.
Rangers should also be punished hard for going to court against lord carloways judgement and for also costing the SFA much needed funds, which could have gone to youth development.
A one year suspension is light!

Agree0 Disagree0

How Independent is this independent panel? looks like the panel of 3 are being directed not only by the SFA, other clubs and their representitives and FIFA. The Panel have already stated that certain sanctions are far too severe! IT IS NOT OUR FAULT that the SFA's list of santions do not cover a greater range of punishments or allow member clubs to take action through CAS. Regan and the SFA must accept that they are at fault.

Agree0 Disagree0

A Scottish Cup ban would be as meaningless as the 10 point deduction!

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed039's Note - Guys this site exists for rumours and a bit of banter, any bile or over the top slagging matches will not be posted and you will be blocked)

Agree0 Disagree0

To How Independent: the SFA bent over backwards to allow Rangers to continue playing in the SPL by imposing the transfer embargo for 12 months - the panel could have kicked them out of Scottish football. There was nothing to prevent Rangers from approaching CAS they choose not to do so and went through the civil courts thus breaking further rules. One needs to question Rangers past actions and current motives and not the action nor motives of the SFA panel. When will Rangers fans stop blaming everyone except their own club? I don't think that they are capable of accepting its there fault and would rather bring down every other club before doing so.

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't deny it us fans are just as responsible for this SFA mess as D&P we gave it verbal and complained. We told D&P to go to court and supported that move, we marched on the SFA, we supported ally in the call to unmask the SFA tribunal, our fans groups leaders have slagged off the SFA and regan and the tribunal guys...... So let's not pretend its not us fans fault.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well done you can copy and paste from the dailyrecord website, as the post above says dont believe all you read on there

JG

Agree0 Disagree0

I didn't march on Hampden and definitely didn't tell D&P to go to court.

That idea was obviously doomed from the start and I would bet D&P realised this, as I said on here before it was just a technique for them to deflect attention away from themselves after the BBC Scotland documentary.

I thought a six month transfer embargo was just about fair but felt we just had to accept Lord Carloway's decision. BB

Agree0 Disagree0

Start the season minus 24 points (A 3rd of last seasons points total as discussed by SFA) also banned from the scottish cup and cant sign players UNTIL football debts are paid back. Hearts, kilmarnock, celtic etc. Also Rapid Vienna and orebro, st.etienne etc debts could be argued aswell. Any less than this would question the integrity of the league. I personally think given the rules broken it should be expulsion or relegated to 3rd division but i think the santions ive stated would please most.

Agree0 Disagree0

The DR is wrong in one area in that Rangers cannot agree with SFA to backtrack and accept one year transfer ban. Lord Glennie has made a Court of Session Ruling sending the issue back to the SFA to chose ANOTHER penalty which IS listed in the SFA statutes. That court order must be complied with by both parties.

Agree0 Disagree0

The money for the qc was paid by rff if im not mistaken is walter smith not involved with admin of the fund surely he must have known the fifa and uefa rules therefore walter has to answer to the fans

Agree0 Disagree0

Walter, sandy Jardine and Ally McCoist advise D&P on footballing matters. Ally and Walter studied in classrooms the relationships between FIFA, UEFA and national associations for their coaches badges. There's no excuse they know the game. This is what happens when there's no directors with degrees and brains and dunderheids run the show, not an O level among them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Having followed this site for a while now, I think its clear there is an underlying attempt to kill off the club with numerous players (FIFA, UEFA, SFA, HMRC, SPL, D&F, Whyte, Green.... etc) now in place to deliver the final shot. Too many lies, unjustified administrators decisions and poor business management strategies have created an absolutley undignified end for such a big club. I am a Celtic supporter and dont deny havin a laugh at gers supporters at work etc at the start of all this malarky, but this is clearly going to end with padlocked doors and boarded up windows at ibrox no matter what decison is made by the SFA. The appeal panel are eff'd if they do and eff'd if they dont! I wouldnt be suprised if D&F go back to court claiming the punishment given out is too harsh to incite FIFA and SFA even further..gers fans and employees are being set up!

Agree0 Disagree0

This is what happens when you run a club totally by fans (ex players and managers making decisions). I think fans owning clubs is the way forward and a great thing, there is an argument however (which i agree with) that you always need someone cold and not necessarily a rangers man in there to make the tough decisions and maybe take a bit of stick but making decisions in the best interest of the club. Someone to say "look, we are going to have to write off next season and blood some of the youngsters and just survive the league season because if we fight this and it backfires, which all the sign are tellling us it will, then we will be in a hell of a mess and even worse off" unpopular decision but the correct decision for the good of Rangers football club.

Agree0 Disagree0

In not an old firm fan, i support my local team(falkirk), quite frankly rangers only have themselves to blame for the mess that they are in. they should have just held their hands up and said we were wrong we made massive mistakes and will take whatever punishment you give us. instead they go to court against the rules and have now got FIFA involved so there can be no other way than for them to be absolutely hammered by the SFA or the whole of scottish football could suffer. the only people i feel sorry for are the fans who have been paying their ticket money and buying the merchandise for years but where has the money went! also the poor staff who work at ibrox and are the ones who will lose their jobs!!

Agree0 Disagree0

The only option available to the board is to ban Rangers from Scottish cup. They have already stated in the press through the incompetent STAFF that expulsion or temporary suspending was too harsh (their words not mine) if they do return one of the too harsh options expect another trip to court of sessions

Agree0 Disagree0

They can only expell Rangers from the Scottish Cup IF it has already started.
There is no option in place to do it before the Cup competition starts.
Which only leaves -
Suspension, expulsion, or termination of SFA membership.
Lord Glennie sent it back to the SFA to choose from its list of available sanctions, and also noted it could result in a harsher sanction than the transfer embargo.
Green cannot accept a 6 month embargo, by their own court case it is not in the list of sanctions, therefore can't be applied.
Also still have the charge for going to the courts in the first place to come.
That will result in some kind of suspension.

Agree0 Disagree0

Look on the positive side. If Rangers get suspended you can take advantage of all these cheap low season holidays without missing games.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 11:15:37
HACKED-OFF Hearts could try to scupper Charles Green’s bid to save Rangers.

Skint Gers still owe the Jambos £800,000 from the £1.5million transfer of Lee Wallace last August.
But under the terms of the CVA issued to creditors this week, Hearts would only get a paltry payment of around £70,000 for the Scotland full-back.
And Tynecastle director Sergejus Fedotovas has revealed the Edinburgh club are consulting with lawyers about the best way to recoup the full fee.
He said: “We’re analysing the situation. We’re looking at it with our legal advisors and considering what the options available to us are.”
We understand one of Hearts’ options would be to REJECT the CVA proposal issued by administrators Duff & Phelps and chase every penny owed.
Owed That would be a big blow to would-be owner Green who needs 75 per cent of creditors to approve the CVA in order for Gers to exit administration on July 12.
His consortium is already anxiously awaiting word on whether Ticketus, who are owed £26.7m, and HMRC — due £21.5m unpaid PAYE tax and National Insurance — will accept their offer.

“The big worry is the players who have got these contracts which can let them leave for silly amounts.”

Hearts can argue legally that the player sales agreement was not concluded as payment for the player was not completed and the player reverts to Hearts contractually.

Believable26 Unbelievable10

Transfer agreements don't allow players to revert back to to selling club if not paid for and there is no retention of title to a player after he has been sold on. Most Heartsvcan do is lodge official complaint with SFA. They can object to the CVA, but their debt is part of the 25% not needed to secure the CVA assuming HMRC and Ticketus vote yes. {Ed039's Note - Did something similar not happen a few years back when Crystal Palace couldnt pay for Craig Moore)

Agree0 Disagree0

This is the kind of situation were the money from the RFF could have been used for a gd cause.

Lee Wallace was one of Rangers' better players in the 2nd half of last season. Hearts basically let one of their best players leave for a paltry fee due to Craig Whyte's conman antics.

A dignified gesture would be to cover the majority of debt owed to Hearts with the RFFF money....sadly they re-turfed a football pitch with it.

With each passing day I lose confidence in this CVA being accepted. I jst can't see it happening.

TTG

Agree0 Disagree0

How can Rangers own the player when they didn't pay for him?

Agree0 Disagree0

Rapid Vienna are owed £1.5m for Jelavic, I'm sure I read they had complained to UEFA, so that's a minimum one more ban in Europe for a year.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't believe rangers have £70k to offer.

I think 9p in the pound is dependent on stuff that will never materialise, once creditors vote yes, it turns into 2 p in a spiv trick.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed, from memory that was a voluntary arrangement between the clubs, mainly pushed by Moore himself wanting to come home. Don't see that sort of friendly arrangement happening as Greene and D&P have already included transfer fees in their calculation for the CVA. {Ed039's Note - Thanks for the info)

Agree0 Disagree0

Scots law comes before what's written in transfer agreements.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers are still owed money for the sale of Jelavic...yes really....Are Everton also due up on charges by UEFA? {Ed039's Note - Everton arent proposing that Rangers accept 9p in the pound for the remainder of the balance)

Agree0 Disagree0

The original £700k has only paid for his services for the last year.
What is Wallaces negotiated transfer minimum fee? Hearts can go to court and ring fence £800k of that.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rapid haven't actually lodged official complaint yet. They do insist though that they get 100% payment of the debt paid and don't recognise the validity of any CVA offer. Legally, they are no better off than any other creditor so will have to take what they are given, but wonder if UEFA will take additional action once an official complaint is lodged?

Agree0 Disagree0

If I dont pay my my dues I lose my house, car and whatever even though it was not my intention not to pay but Rangers never intended to pay did they. They should be stripped of everything. {Ed039's Note - This is the argument ex Jambo John Robertson used a few weeks ago)

Agree0 Disagree0

Gawn the jambo's

Agree0 Disagree0

What are the chances of anyone paying Rangers any money owed? If I owed rangers money I wouldn't pay it. They don't have the funds to go to court and I believe there is an odds on chance of liquidation which means debt written off. It works both ways!

Agree0 Disagree0

Scots law and the courts exist for this precise kind of situation. D&P are fond of going through to Edinburgh. Hearts should drag them through and ring fence any Wallace transfer fee for the £800k plus all legal costs.

Agree0 Disagree0

Should it come to liquidation/newco hopefully Rangers will need Hearts vote to be admitted straight back into the SPL. Its not just about Hearts needing the money to sign new players its also about them having the resources to resign their out of contract players who have just won the Scottish Cup. {Ed039's Note - Dont take this the wrong way because its not meant to sound narky, but it is not just this when it comes to Hearts, they will be next because Romanov doesnt want to touch them and they could be down the same road as Rangers)

Agree0 Disagree0

Kilmarnock are heavily indebted as well, in fact it appears every club is run by semi competent businessmen with the exception of septic.

Agree0 Disagree0

Right....

ticketus 26.7m
hmrc 21.5m
rapid 1.5m
hearts 800k

greens cva 'pot' would give 11p in the pound deal to creditors.he claims its the best deal on offer as liquadation would leave less than 1m in the pot for creditors.

CVA= 11p in the £

ticketus would get 2,937,000m
(a loss of 23,763,000m)

hmrc would get 2,365,000m
(a loss of 19,135,000m)

hearts would get 88,000k
(a loss of 712,000k)

rapid would get 165k
(a loss of 1,3335,000)

hearts are the least of your problems.put it this way i borrowed £1,000 from you & 6 months later i said all i can offer you is £110?

what would you do ? take £110 or fight it & try & get a court order to try & get more from me?

this is where liquation comes back into the picture.there must be a law in stating that you know your going down the tubes but yet you can sell your assest to someone else & create a new company & basicly say haha your getting nothing ill start a fresh with assests reaching over 100m ?

dont think so.....

even his wee blue booklet is a joke 'you would be mad not to invest in rangers' even tho hes taking a loan out to get them kicked off and has till 2020 8 years to pay it off lolol

also whats happened to the 20 investors ? wheres their money ?

one more thing IF this cva some how goes through will you be getting your season book for ibrox ?

charles green... the english craig whyte

lenny

Agree0 Disagree0

If JR used that argument two weeks ago ED he was quite right to do so. Any reasonable person could not disagree with the points raised. {Ed039's Note - I dont disagree with the man, I have obligations and if I dont meet them then me and my family suffer the consequences so it should work for all walks of life)

Agree0 Disagree0

What are the chances: don't know about that mate they seem to make monies appear for court actions on a weekly basis. Odd that!

Agree0 Disagree0

UEFA should instruct everton to pay hearts the Jelavic money directly. Not going through broke Rangwrs. This way the money stays in football and doesn't go to D&P as fees.

Agree0 Disagree0

The situation at Tynecastle is different to that of Rangers. Romanov wishes Hearts to be self financing so that it is easier to sell the club on as he percieves the game to be corrupt in Scotland. In affect he owes the debt to himself not to a Bank/lender so therefore it would stupid to bankrupt/liquidate himself, especially as he earns his living/reputation in the Banking industry .Further he wrote off £10 mill of his/the clubs debt in 11/2011 and the club made a trading profit of £500,000 for the financial year 2011/2012 according to the latest published accounts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hearts should take Rangers to court and hurt D&P in the pocket, at least.

Agree0 Disagree0

There's also all the gate receipts and ticket monies owed, SPL teams just cannot afford to write off their meagre incomes to Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hearts should accept that they wont get the money, but they should go to UEFA like Rapid have done as UEFA would hit Rangers with a 1 yr transfer embargo, gets the SFA out a bind and also an extra 1 yr european ban, and in effect this will cost Rangers far more than the money they owe both clubs. also in future Hearts could easly refuse to sell players to Rangers, or give Rangers other problems in the future. Hearts should accept they are a creditor and place the matter into UEFAs hands, the wont get the money they are owed

Agree0 Disagree0

RFC then

Agree0 Disagree0

So it's ok for everyone else to take recourse to the Law then.?

bil72

Agree0 Disagree0

Cva is all but signed and sealled. hearts like other creditors are going to feel the pinch. its unfortunate but thats the world we live in. admin cvas and liquidation is not a new invention and people in football just need to accept this. it is a fact that sports such as football have been ruined due to money. football needs to change and reduce its reliance on money. clubs should be give a max spend per year and they show give the surplus to local charities and developing the community they live in. thats integrity!

Agree0 Disagree0

Watching men's gymnastics European championships. No cheating, no corruption, no financial doping indebtedness, SPIVS, tax evasion, non payments, just sporting excellencd and integrity. Well done the UK team for winning the team event for the first time ever!
I'm sure the rest of Scottish football is ok or we would've heard something. It all appears to be rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lenny taking giberish again if the CVA is anywhere near 11p in the pound it is guaranteed to go through but will be nowhere near that As for liquidation how many times SECURED CREDITORS £40 MILLION must be paid before HMRC receive a percentage of what is left

Agree0 Disagree0

The vast majority of you screaming about taking Rangers to court seem to be missing a HUGE point here, They are in ADMINISTRATION, the courts have granted them this ADMINISTRATION order to protect them from their debtors and prevent them being able to be taken to court and wound up over them, do you even understand the meaning of the word Administration? I'm not saying whether what is happening is right or wrong but as one of the other posters pointed out, it's all just business and like it or not, any company or even individual, struggling with theior finances and debts are perfectly entitled to seek bankruptcy protection from the courts.

Agree0 Disagree0

Look to American Football...

Winner gets last place in the draft choices each year - this means no-one goes on 9 year winning streak, all teams have a chance, and for 50 years its got loads of money for owners, sponsors and players.

SPL 2 team operation lead to more teams in administration - in the first premier leauge in world... so we see what independance does for scotland...

banks go bust

gers (biggest team in world 54 league trophies) go bust

spl goes bust...

sfa .... follows...

doom and gloom

Agree0 Disagree0

Think we should dig out the Romanov rants that sounded so ludicrus a year ago. Wonder how much truth was hiding in there?

Agree0 Disagree0

Do former Rangers directors still have monies ring fenced?

Agree0 Disagree0

Business is business as SDM said. Every Scottish SPL team will not except less than a one year transfer embargo. Forget only getting a Scottish Cup ban UEFA and FIFA would almost close Scottish football if that happened. If Rangers are not liquidated Hearts,Rapid and a few other teams owed money will go to UEFA/ FIFA and the sanctions from that alone could close Rangers down.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hearts cannot stop the cva, only hmrc and ticketus have enough of a vote to block it. for the cva to pass 75% of the debt must vote for it which means if hmrc and ticketus say yes then it will pass but if 1 of them says no then it is bye bye rangers and maybe hello newco.

Agree0 Disagree0

Where did the poster above get 11p in the pound from?

By the time you take off D&Ps fees at the end of the process and it appears that they haven't paid taxes since taken over (so they become payable also), you are left with next to nothing.

The CVA proposal has been written specifically to be rejected.
Green WANTS a newco free of all debt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hi ed you talked about the moore situation it also happend with trevor steven(marsaille),.,.kbarry

Agree0 Disagree0

HAVE HIM MATEY, was never worth the money anyway..

Agree0 Disagree0

Rfff to pay lol it took ur lot 5 months to raise half a million hearts want their £700k the money should be taken off the runners up league money.that money should be used to clear the football debts

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 08:00:14
All teams are guilty of cheating from barcelona to a local Sunday league team a wee dive here a handball there Henry handball cost Ireland's economy £100 million don't call it gamesmanship cheating is cheating Maybe not on the scale of rangers But all teams are guilty of some sort of cheating however you want paper over the cracks {Ed013's Note - Yeah my Sunday league is full of corrupt ref's!}

Believable10 Unbelievable21

Does that justify it?

Agree0 Disagree0

What a crazy analogy!!! so everyone is corrupt and that justifies everything that rangers have done?? if everyone jumped of erskine bridge would you follow them??

Agree0 Disagree0

If I jump of the Erskine Bridge do we get 9 in a Row again? If so Geronimo!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Disgusting post.

By your way of thinking, rangers are no worse than say, Dalry Thistle. I think not. I cannot believe fans are STILL trying to justify the way rangers has been run. I have no sympathy for morons like you

Agree0 Disagree0

How big a bag of straws do you have there ?......col

Agree0 Disagree0

What exactly is the point that you are trying to make?

Agree0 Disagree0

That has to be the stupidest post ever.
Ahhh forget Im not even going to start........................

Agree0 Disagree0

Not paying our bills on time isnt really cheating. Yes we have been living beyond our means. And yes we will now face the consequences of that. It is unfortunate that creditors will not get their money. But that's how insolvency works in this country.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jun 2012 01:17:01
Can we get 1 thing right FIFA = federation of international football uefa = union of European football uefa will do us not FIFA who are even more corrupt than SDM ang cw ffs.

Believable13 Unbelievable11

So your point exactly is?....... It dosent matter who does us either way we will be punished n deservedly so

Agree0 Disagree0

It is a co-ordinated approach from both FIFA and UEFA, but FIFA are believed to be taking the lead.

Agree0 Disagree0

This is the second nonsensical post that I have read so far, what are you on about?

Agree0 Disagree0

To 1st and 3rd reply op is correct I'm a celtic fan UEFA will punish RFC in the end

Agree0 Disagree0

To 4th post. When SFA suspend Rangers as they have no alternative now and HMRC and Ticketus tear the assets into little pieces there will be nothing left for EUFA or anyone else to have a go at. (Except maybe the Wimpey demolishers)

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent