Rangers Rumours Archive July 09 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


09 Jul 2012 17:43:09
The Scottish FA has not granted international clearance for the transfers of five players who declined to move their contracts from the old to the "newco" Rangers and found other clubs.PA Photos
Steven Naismith (centre) left the 'newco' Rangers for Everton
The latest twist in a summer of turmoil and uncertainty around the Ibrox club means FIFA is likely to grant temporary clearance for the quintet while it considers a final and definitive ruling on the situation.

With Charles Green's Rangers seeking compensation for players moving away, the SFA declined to grant clearance for the transfers of Steven Naismith to Everton, Steven Whittaker to Norwich, Steven Davis to Southampton, Kyle Lafferty to Sion or Jamie Ness to Stoke.

A club signing a player requests clearance through its own football association, which then contacts the association representing the country played in by the player being signed, but this scenario is complicated by the "newco" Rangers not yet being members of the Scottish FA.

And although Green is attempting to secure compensation for players moving on, the 11 to have left Rangers in the summer were advised by players' union lawyers that the situation makes them free agents.

The "newco" owner, however, claims the players are in breach of contract and wrote to clubs in the English leagues to inform them that this was how he saw the situation.

Believable12 Unbelievable11

This may be the worst thing that could happen. If FIFA are asked to make a judgement there is the potential that they can rule newco have no rights to the players as it is a new club. This would be the final word on the issue of continuity in the eyes of world football

grout

Agree25 Disagree7

Fifa will now rule tupe in the players favour.......AS

Agree35 Disagree6

09 Jul 2012 15:33:45
The SFA refuses clearance for Steven Naismith, Davis, Whittaker, Lafferty and Ness.

Believable7 Unbelievable7

All lundys the lot of them ,they should have at least gave gers a chance to recoup something for what theve outlaid in cash over the years in overpriced wages ,then moved on ,then again d and p assed that up big style doug t.s.o

Agree21 Disagree21

Yes, I think D&P are ultimately to blame here. All would have been well if the CVA went through, of course. But there was no legal certainty for "Plan B", and Green should have known this.

Agree2 Disagree2

It is hardy the players fault Rangers overpaid them, if they had not, most would not have been at Rangers in the first place.

Anorak.

Agree3 Disagree1

Been given temp clearance to play until arbitration has been heard.

Agree0 Disagree0

Doug what would you do how can you stay loyal to a club that does not exist anymore, the 75% pay cut was enough for anybody to give up, I'm sure none of us would have done that for our employers it's a short career and they have got to make as much out of the game as they can.

Agree1 Disagree4

Yeah that's right and displayed a sense of morality ?? If that was the done thing at Ibrox none of this sorry mess would have happened

Agree2 Disagree1

The players knew what they were doing when they took the 75% cut ,why did they agree to a cut price sale when full wages resumed ,yes they were out the door like road runners as soon as the liquidation signs were up , as regards gers overpaying them ,some of the players deserved their wages ,but some of the others like whittaker must have had a red face when he looked at his bank statement every month ,a short career yes 17 to 35 ish thats 18 years of possibly earning top earnings ,as ive said before who retires at 35 ? roy of the rovers ? eg .look at lafferty hardly out the door and sion and him are in trouble already ,the real thing here is gers will exist in the future one way or another with a big support ,and if the players had stayed with the club they would have still been in the spotlight for other clubs if they wanted to move on and kiss someone elses badge .wonder what theyl do if their new clubs badge is on the back of their shorts doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2012 14:49:50
Portsmouth are closing in on a deal for former Rangers midfielder Rhys McCabe.

Believable10 Unbelievable14

LOLZ, now even Portsmouth is more appealing to join.

Agree17 Disagree5

Portsmouth only have 8 players turn up for training, MCCabe must be off his head.

Agree8 Disagree1

Whats the point in going to one club on its knees to another

Agree2 Disagree1

If portsmouth had the same penalties applied to them that are being proposed against us for their financial state and re-birth they would not be capable of affording McCabe nor would they be allowed to complete a transfer. You've got to laugh!

Agree4 Disagree3

"Portsmouth only have 8 players turn up for training, MCCabe must be off his head."

How many did Rangers have their first day?? {Ed039's Note - 13, that's 5 more than Portsmouth)

Agree4 Disagree2

Both teams play in blue. Can anyone else figure out a solution to both teams' problems here?

Agree1 Disagree0

How many did rangers have their first day? {ed039's note - 13, that's 5 more than portsmouth)

13, my god, he should have stayed where he was :-/ (ed039's note - was there a problem with my answer?)

Agree0 Disagree0

Not at all ed apart from sevco started with 13 players....rangers had none.......when is the nice sevco 5088 sign going up ton the page? sevco5088rumours.co.uk {Ed039's Note - I've never heard that one before, you are so funny)

Agree0 Disagree0

Thank you ed. the wit and sarcasm of a putrid toilet.....well done

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2012 00:52:54
THE Charles Green consortium have told Rangers supporters that it would take at least £50 million for them to sell the newco club – a figure which would give them an astonishing 900 per cent profit on their initial £5.5m investment.
Source - Scotsman

Believable75 Unbelievable25

I really hope this provokes a backlash from fans this is outrageous. See my post above.

Scunnered bear

Agree25 Disagree22

So a few months later now that we are out of the spl and europe and have lost most of our players charles green now considers 50 million a fair price on a bad day for the club. I thought a bad day for the club was when we were in admin so where was your 50 million bid for the club back then charles green? Or was 5.5 million and the third division just too good a deal to resist and in reflection is all the club is really worth at this moment in time aswell. Wise up fellow bears these owners are just as bad as the previous ones give them f#*k all

Agree56 Disagree18

Club was sold for what someone was prepared to pay for it. Alternative was no buyer, club liquidated, assets sold off individually and Rangers would have ceased to exist (old or newco).

Agree50 Disagree13

No doubt it will be noted by everyone who got bumped for cash and every other Club in Scotland!

Agree20 Disagree11

I wonder if based on their current valuation statement if the liquidators will take Sevco to court on the basis that D&P sold it to them too cheaply - there is a mechanism for them to do that to protect creditors and it would seem just for it to be used given the huge gap between £50M (valuation) and £5.5M (purchase price of assets).

Agree31 Disagree13

Rangers fans are not going to pay 50 million for any share issue, Green is deranged.

Anorak.

Agree23 Disagree11

You guys have to get your heads round the way business works.Yes Green paid 5.5m but thats over now.He has the potential of 40k season ticket sales,if you pay or not the potential is there,and that hoists the price up.Add sponsorship etc and the figure rises.

Agree15 Disagree17

Nobody wanted the club before Liquidation, Newco would have been bought by someone, Remember Walters bid?

Agree21 Disagree1

Newco is debt free and asset rich, so the value of the "goodwill" and net worth of the company goes up accordingly. This is how investors/purchasers of the club were enticed to bid.

Agree15 Disagree10

The alternative to Green was liquidation HELLO news RFC have been liquidated some alternative if I was a Rangers fan he wouldn't be getting a penny of me

Agree13 Disagree4

The £50m valuation is opinion - you could say a £1 billion quid but unless you can find a purchaser for whatever price you are asking it's just pie in the sky.

I suspect the £50m numbers has been thrown in public arena to scare off the likes of Bomber or any further attempts by any of the Knights to put in token bids.

Agree6 Disagree4

Charles Green was prepared to put his money where his mouth was at the critical time (which Smith, Brown, et al were not) and he should logically expect to reap the benefits of his gamble and his guts. Its common enough to purchase something at a liquidation sale and for its value then to soar.

Agree4 Disagree6

What Brian Stockbridge actually said was that they valued the club at 50 mil - whilst they are perfectly entitled to value it a this, it's only actually worth what someone is prepared to pay - Paul Murrays plan with the anticipated money from share issues would also have valued the club in the same region

Agree4 Disagree2

This court action is more likely to succed as the liquidated company assets were not offered for bidders but simply stuffed in greens pockets.

Agree5 Disagree3

Major supermarket will take over . its going no other way. mr green wants a profit. and he will get it. you can blame john brown when this happens

Agree7 Disagree8

Yes lads, the difference is Charles Green paid the cash, what happened to all the others, when you are in the driving seat you can ask what you want, but I am sure they will listen to all sensible offers as.........yes you guessed it, they are businessmen, at the end of the day Green stumped up the cash....end of....face the facts

Agree7 Disagree4

Imho green is looking to shut the doors al together ...why say it would take 50 mill for him to leave ..he knows no one would ever pay that for a newco

Agree8 Disagree4

Maybe the guy's fed up off smith and brown tryin to get the club on the cheap just saying a price to put of the vultures. Think its about time the fans got behind the guy or we'll just be back to square one

Agree4 Disagree8

For god sake . Stop washing your dirty linen in publicc. Get behind RFC and build a club again. Be part of history people.

Agree5 Disagree11

The nett worth of the assets only increases after Rangers gets back into Europe and becomes a commercially viable business, it will cost the consortium 30 million to get them there. Green is dreaming if he seriously thinks a marginal business is worth 50 million.

If its Div 1 then the newco may just survive, if its div 3 then there is no chance.

Anorak.

Agree9 Disagree9

The longer green is in control the more money he will lose in the long run.

Agree5 Disagree4

The BDO who is liquidating the old company can reclaim the assests and are considering it because they feel the assests were sold so cheap.

Agree6 Disagree2

Minor detail - Rangers have not actually been liquidated.

Agree3 Disagree6

'For its value then to soar'? Seriously are you for real? do you understand the logistics of liquidation? I'll spell it out for you... Bargain basement sale, all assets go for cheap to the highest bidder nowhere near the true value of its worth! Fire sale, accumulate as much money as possible to pay debts/ creditors... You getting it yet? Mr Green or any other is in no position to 'haggle' or turn down bids mate! Out of his hands. He can value something as high as he wants but his delusional, egocentric, megalomaniac bubble is going to burst soon too, just like Murray and whyte! But them again, perhaps whyte is murrays little fall-guy, and in turn green is whytes little fall-guy?! Makes perfect sense. They all escape prosecution, they all walk away, and they all walk away with their pockets full not giving a sh*t! Just my opinion though!

Agree8 Disagree2

If you are going to offer shares in a club, you are not going to value said club for 5.5m are you ? Much better to value it at 50m, higher value equals higher share price.

Agree0 Disagree2

I don't think BDO will watch idly as Rangers Newco is sold for much more than £5.5m.

Agree1 Disagree0

While liquidation sales are generally a bargin they are usually around 20-30% of book value and for assets in demand can be as high as 60%. 10p in the pound for assets is low (based on Greens valuation). 5p in the pound based on D&P's valuation is nonsense. Especially as the assets were not offered on the opne market. I think there is a real possibility of this being reversed.

Agree2 Disagree0

I understand the logistics of liquidation perfectly well from some thirty years in business, thank you very much. The allegory was a perfectly valid one. Items purchased in a liquidation scenario often increase in value thereafter. And I dont need to be patronised by you over the repitition of such a simple, straight forward fact. As for Mr Green being in no position to turn any offer down - correct me if I'm wrong, but he has already turned down two offers; for £6.5m and £8.7m respectively. Or is that just my opinion also?

Agree0 Disagree0

"Club was sold for what someone was prepared to pay for it."
--

As is anything, and it won't be any different with the next sale of Glasgow Rangers FC.

Can anyone see Green sticking around until we make it back from SFL3?

IMO the club will be up for sale immediately once SFL3 confirmed.

Agree2 Disagree1

08 Jul 2012 23:25:27
NEWCO 5088 NEWS
Charles green looking to buy 52% of st mirren which would allow them a license plus spl status , ibrox even though a listed building being offered to developers! Newco would play at st mirren , gilmour still to be convinced , This was why brown said Green wouldnt be safe! AS

Believable42 Unbelievable88

St Mirren fan base would not accept owning shares in a Newco and losing their history. No chance of this one flying.

Agree35 Disagree17

If this were true (i doubt it) then Green would be putting his own head through the noose. His new acquisition would never survive as neither sets of fans would put a foot inside the ground.

Agree20 Disagree4

I think the 50mil for gers was tongue
in cheek meaning. he's not for selling
but if someone wanted to offer 50mil
then......

Agree10 Disagree0

What are you smoking, i know this is a rumours page but not a huge big whopper just make it up as i have nothing else to do page. get a grip next you will be saying that we are merging with Celtic and will be called Rantic !!

Agree6 Disagree0

If any of the above nonsense is true, we really are dead

Agree3 Disagree1

Ffs when will Rangers fans realise that any, and I mean ANY, of the so-called buyers, interested parties, past and present are NOT interested in rangers football club, the fans, the players or the history! They are interested in one thing....making money from their small investment and walking away with a big return. For all fans defending Green saying he's the only one to step forward etc etc, he's already stated publically that he doesn't plan to be around longer than a year. If that doesn't spell it out to all you who defend him then I don't know what will. To these guys it's BUSINESS! Not football, history or love of the club...BUSINESS! So please wake up and get with the real world! :-/

Agree5 Disagree1

My mate ran a boys club up in arbroath called rancel doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

In reply to the rangers celtic merger post i have already done that one a few months back, i think i remember something like 90 disagrees and a wave of abuse and one solitary guy who got the dark humour behind it and commended me for it being the best post he had read on this site. It brought me much amusement reading over the replys to that post. Wish i could remember most of what i posted but it was along the lines of merging and creating a super club that would compete with the big boys in england. The bigots amongst us responded in fury! Lol

Scunnered bear

Agree1 Disagree0

Rancel, that brings back memories! I used to play against them when I was a boy, are they still on the go?

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes rancel are still on the go ,they are based in arbroath ,but my mate doesnt have anything to do with the club now doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Jul 2012 20:30:30
Rumours aluko will stay if were in division 1 hope there true great player FERGIE E/K

Believable36 Unbelievable69

Shouldnt the players that have left not have left until after the old range rs are liquidated

Agree0 Disagree2

 
Change Consent