02 May 2017 17:38:14
Looks like Michael O'Neill going to be Norwich City Manager with compensation likely to be around £500k according to BBC! We paid £600k for Pedro?


1.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 18:05:49
Was it as much as that? I don't think MON was ever an option.


2.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 18:47:48
And what? I'm from Northern Ireland so I think a lot of Michael O'Neil but what makes you think he would be any good in league football. His only managerial experience in club football was in the league of Ireland. Lawrie sanchez had a brilliant record with us but flopped big time when he got his chance with fulham


3.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 18:54:46
Yately heard it was £300k
Also opinions on Will Vaulkes. For me I would rather we put the money into a bigger transfer fee for a better player.
If true and Caixinha has a list of 12 players and Vaulkes is one I would rather bring in one less at the expense of Vaulkes and put the £400k towards a better player OR use the money on wages fot an free transfer. Vaulkes is not the standard we want he's ok but C'mon. Thoughts Bears?


4.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 18:55:42
O'neill good manager always loved to have seen laurie sanchez few years back get the chance to manage the gers.


5.) 02 May 2017
02 May 2017 20:10:42
Dont believe everything that's in the papers. there linking us with everyone so when they eventually get 1 right they can tell us rhey told us so. it was the same when we were looking for a manager, there was a new name everyday and they still didn't get it right


6.) 03 May 2017
03 May 2017 20:43:34
people saying we shouldn't be looking back but going for players that can play at this level can't be a bad thing if u think getting whittiker, naisy kyle bartley would not improve our team then there is something really wrong with your brain.

i know we haven't been linked with bartley but i'd be trying my best to get him in my team i think he is a great cb he is big solid smart and way faster than anything in our defense