29 Apr 2020 07:55:19
Morning Folks, I was just reading the story about this 'Open Letter' to all Clubs from the SPFL Board on the BBC Web Page today, with Stewart Robertson being the only person not to sign it. I stated in a post about a week ago, that things would be made to look like we are the bad guys in this whole debacle, and, that is exactly the strategy the SPFL are taking. Where do we go if we don't get the 75% required to have this Independent Inquiry', that's my big fear, if we have damning evidence, it should have been given to the Police.

1.) 29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020 10:40:45
Our next action might just depend on what evidence we have. Corruption, or anti-Rangers or both?
SPFL silence on McLennan alleged comments in Private Eye is evidence of their wagon circling. That question is already out there and they refuse to address. I hope other fair minded chairmen (no laughing) are also asking why SPFL won't respond to this allegation, especially McLennan himself.

2.) 29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020 13:00:25
What I would like to know is when was the Deloitte investigation first announced? Does anyone know .
Surely it wasn’t until after the spfl got the answer they wanted?

3.) 29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020 14:08:58
Molsgoals, “investigation lite” announced after widespread criticisms surrounding Good Friday vote shenanigans.

4.) 29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020 14:42:48
There is only one club who can hold the SPFL board to account and you all know which one "the one with the fans who are afraid of soap and water".

We Rangers fans must be prepared for further humiliation as I'am now convinced we have NO evidence of wrong doing by the SPFL or it would have been brought to light by now.

Our club is surrounded by a firewall with the rest of the SPFL clubs with one dominant club protected who have support at all levels in the board.

5.) 29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020 17:52:08
I'm afraid I agree with irvger and Bluebilly, if we have anything like a damning dossier it should have been presented to the most senior police officer, at least one sympathetic MP and a QC so that it could be collaborated when the time comes to present it. Be prepared to take another embarrassment here.

6.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 10:13:47
but why? isn't like football on the pitch? if you don't make a problem the team with more support can run all over you. try at least to make the ref think twice.

7.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 12:08:47
Keep our powder dry, plenty of time.

8.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 15:39:44
Yes I think so too . the later we present the better. otherwise they will just contrive a story . like they have done so far . How on earth was the Deloitte investigation not advertised before they proceeded?

This fact meant that no evidence from an outside source was presented? How on earth is that an independent enquire when any material was only submitted by the accused?

Unbelievable. really really hope we have evidence of Peter pulling the strings . and I don’t mean blue Peter.

9.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 19:12:31
There is no evidence of Peter pulling the strings despite all the wishful thinking on here. And the reason for that is there is no conspiracy.

10.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 19:29:07
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

11.) 30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020 20:53:21
Nope just dealing in facts as we know them at present. If proven that “Peter” runs all of Scottish football and everyone does his bidding I will obviously come on here and stand corrected. As I have been at pains to say no one one here has shown anything to make me change my view other than idle gossip and paranoia.

12.) 01 May 2020
01 May 2020 00:13:55
So who was the peter that Neil Doncaster was phoning with the news of votes before deadline?

13.) 01 May 2020
01 May 2020 16:51:44
Lie well would be massive odds on at Ladbroke slimey piece of work, he'll get what's coming to him.