07 May 2020 22:37:44
Man o man. There's nothing incriminating whatsoever. It's just page after page of supposed incompetence of the spfl. That's not corruption. It's not coercion. We were all led to believe that we had bang on proof against N.D and Mckenzie. Unless we pull something from our arse linking them directly to wrongdoing, we're in trouble. A few pieces of limited info here and there relating to TV deals and liability isn't enough.

Voting interference is a problem, but the staff shortage has that covered. From what I see, there is nothing. Just questions. No real proof relating any one person to any one crime. If we have wassap messages or financial records, then we might have something. At the mo, it's all Bs. It's embarrassing. 1 month to accuse spfl with no proof. Some evidence must have been kept secret from us until the meeting next week. Let's hope. If not RFC will lose all respect from so many people and the p**s taking will go on for years. It's not looking good. Fingers crossed for new evidence.

1.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 08:13:48
The whole exercise is to win the votes of the clubs so we can get an inquiry . It wasn’t designed to bring the spfl down . Hopefully the inquiry will do that . or if no inquiry. our next move
There was a lot of damming accusations in that doc . and if they are not true . you would think the spfl would be screaming legals from the rooftops . but they are not and seem more concerned about influencing joe public rather than addressing the content .
Let’s wait and see.

2.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 08:22:11
Doncaster was told by 2 clubs that there was an attempt to bully them into changing they're vote. Doncaster didn't tell the SPFL board about it and didn't do anything about it.
Surely not pointing out the ramifications that might occur if the season was finished early (liabilities regarding the TV deals and sponsorship)
Telling uefa that the majority of clubs wanted the league's finished before anyone has voted?
I thought there was plenty of questions in the dossier for the SPFL and especially Doncaster to answer.

3.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 10:14:34
For me the evidence is not exactly mind blowing. yes incompetence is evident but not to the level our board were shouting about. I'm dissapointed and quite embarrassed by this as a rangets fan.

4.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 10:52:31
Rossco, i don't agree with you, our gripe is the s.p.f.l. Told the clubs the good side of finishing league early, they never told them the bad side, that outweighs the goodside, but this is only us trying to get an inquiry opened, its the stuff we have not mentioned that's the good part.

5.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 10:53:46
So voting interference is covered in the uk by staff shortages? mmm.

6.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 11:06:22
considering their rebuttal was found quicker than the missing vote. yes.

7.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 12:23:24
Doncaster was quick out the blocks, last weekend doing interviews all over the place, where is he today with answers to the accusations Not a peep. No McClellan self answer session either, no Alloa/ Dunfermline Chairman denials today.
All quiet, because they are all corrupt and all Rangers haters.

8.) 08 May 2020
08 May 2020 19:07:05
The SFL had already contacted UEFA 10 days before the vote to me that's corruption. They have withheld information about possible financial liabilities involved with the tv deal should season finish early to the sum of 10mil which to me is misconduct. They stated they were unable to pay out prize money until season ends but withheld the fact member clubs could receive interest free loans which could have been payable when prize money issued. They announced vote results prior to the final votes being cast again corruption. Dundee have since had financial sponsorship from a company who don't have the finances to cover it, in other words it's a pay off for the yes vote. At the very least we have provided enough for an independent investigation.

9.) 09 May 2020
09 May 2020 02:53:11
Bhl83.the letter to UEFA meant absolutely nothing, and the outcome of the vote backed what said. The only thing rangers could argue for poor governance is that there are too few non-executive directors on the board, affecting the independence. Nothing else.

10.) 09 May 2020
09 May 2020 08:33:39
Bellshilad there's a heap of reasos why this inquiry should happen, but this lot have been running things there way for so long other clubs will fear letting there big boss down, big pete with the smelly feet, lol.