03 Apr 2021 16:20:08
Told we have scouts at eland rd today.


1.) 03 Apr 2021
03 Apr 2021 17:50:11
Watching who John25 🤔🤔.


2.) 03 Apr 2021
03 Apr 2021 18:43:11
Could have been lundstrum again.


3.) 03 Apr 2021
03 Apr 2021 19:51:53
SGL I believe it is lundstrum, we r trying to show we really want him.


4.) 03 Apr 2021
03 Apr 2021 21:53:43
John fleck i'm hearing John25 🤔.


5.) 04 Apr 2021
03 Apr 2021 23:29:48
With a bit of luck it was Ethan Ampadu. Lundstram had a poor game.


6.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 07:18:05
Not a chance re fleck still in contract and they turned down 20 million.
That would be a serious backward step signing him.


7.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 08:07:15
Doubt it was fleck
Lundstram being the more likely.


8.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 09:07:36
Whether it's Lundstrum or Fleck, or even both, we have to look at this as being a positive move. Lundstrum might have had a poor game, but he's a good player who would definitely add to what we have at the moment. Fleck, we know is a good player, and over the last couple of years he has taken his game to a higher level, so again, would add something to the team.
Unfortunately it looks like Jack has a major injury issue, and If this is as serious as it sounds, either of these players could come in and do the job.


9.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 09:29:35
Lundstrum a free fleck 20 million who would u sign BMG.


10.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:08:01
Fleck £20m 🤣 how can they value him that highly when they pay him just 10k per week he’s doing well there and I’m happy for the lad but lunstrum is the first player I’d be trying to sign from that side he’d walk straight into our starting 11.


11.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:21:27
Lundstrum, in a heartbeat John. Where are you getting 20m for Fleck from? Was that the figure that was getting banded about when Arsenal were supposedly interested? Was the Arsenal interest concrete? Different circumstances now, and I can't see them getting anything like this.


12.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:26:31
I also think he would walk straight into our team Highland, but for some reason, there's some on here who think he's not good enough. Strange, but it's all about opinions after all.


13.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:32:22
Ethan am paid would cost silly money mcjie.


14.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:34:55
That’s what Arsenal were quoted allegedly when arteta wanted him in the summer. I suppose arsenal interest as concrete as us and players we are linked with.
Highland figures indicate fleck on 20 k a week.
An aside for those that say we may get 10-12 million for Morelos, mcburniee going to wolves for 20 million according to papers. One goal 32 matches.

Alf is worth 20 million with sell on.


15.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 10:50:10
20m for Mcburnie? Mental!


16.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 11:10:48
I’m amazed wolves and others want him.


17.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 11:50:38
I don’t think lundstram is any improvement on what we have. Looks like he’s towing a caravan.


18.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 12:00:13
Don’t agree bgate an upgrade on every one off our midfield players. However, respect your view point.


19.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 12:00:41
I like lundstrum bgate w, but i think there's better that we can get 🤔.


20.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 12:09:01
Wolves are wanting mcburnie for 15mill madness.


21.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 12:48:23
SGL who is better than lundstrum and offers same value ie sign on a free.


22.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 13:05:23
lundstrum has been poor most of season mostly being played out of position to accommodate another player. why he wants away. not a winger. central mid only. wants to be stevie g.


23.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 13:16:02
I never said on a free John25 🤔
Lundstrum an upgrade on steven davis mate 🤔 No chance, not for me mate 👎
Its all about opinions i suppose
I just don't see lundstrum in the same class as steven davis mate 🤔.


24.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 13:41:27
Both Kamara and davis are better than lundstrum👍.


25.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 14:12:00
Iris about opinions, in case u don’t know the free market is a very good market for us, we r skint.
Davis is virtually finished at our level so getting a lundstrum in on a free as is boy from Bournemouth is excellent business and good succession planing.


26.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 14:27:01
It’s about opinions coldo, how long do you think Davis will play for.
U said last month kamara will leave.
So thereafter who plays.


27.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 14:45:26
Nowhere near skint i can assure you.


28.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:03:33
SGL I really hope u r correct re finances.


29.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:06:33
Yes John25 and you're forgetting you stated that lundstrum was an upgrade in any of our midfielders 🤔 Absolutely no danger imo! I agree with coldo that wee davo and kamara are better than lundstrum and when jacko's fit so is he in front of lundstrum for me! I'm not saying lundstrum isn't a good midfielder because he is, but if i was signing another midfielder or two this summer it would be younger midfielders i'd prefer us to sign.


30.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:25:17
SGL let’s wait for the accounts to come before saying if we are skint or not. As C.V. has hit other teams hard it will have hit ours too.

John I am with you if we can get lundstrum on a free it’s a great bit of business.


We definitely need a replacement lined up for Davis as he can’t go on for ever and Jack also as his injury problems won’t go away.


31.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:36:29
I never said Kamara would leave John. 👍.


32.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:46:19
SGL as we keep saying it’s about opinions, lundstrum is an upgrade on a 36 year old mid, who won’t last forever imo kamara will go.
So we need upgrades or slide backwards
Very good on point post kJ.


33.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:48:52
Were certainly not flush anyway and almost certain need to sell b4 bringimg in any player of value.


34.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 15:51:52
Cool coldo, I think he is the one that may go along with kent.


35.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 16:04:56
I think we should set our sights for better calibre than lundstram. Just because he’s a freebie doesn’t make him a good signing.


36.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 16:35:54
Guys your saying all our midfielders are better than lundstrum. you have to look at the calibre of players there playing against. Crap team can make any player look good. I for 1 think lundstrum would boss it up here. at the moment we have nobody to replace arfield. lundstrum would do that me thinks.


37.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 16:59:26
Our mids look great in europe DD👍 I'm not saying lundstrum will not be good business or we shouldn't sign him but he's certainly not an upgrade on Kamara and davis👍.


38.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:16:16
Correct coldo.


39.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:18:56
I'll ask you something DD1980🤔Do you rate lundstrum better than davis, kamara and jacko and like coldo pointed out, all these guys have also been superb in europe for us, against very good quality opposition 🤔.


40.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:45:38
He would be a better option to Jack seeing he's always injured. Davis, as much as he is strolling it just now, can't go on forever, so If we can get a player the calibre of Lundstrum, on a free, then we take it. As for Kamara, I think he'll stay another season, and I hope he does.


41.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:50:59
Our midfield would dominate Sheffield utds.


42.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 18:01:08
All about opinions BMGH01,but i'd much prefer us to bring in the 2 younger midfielders that's getting mentioned ie. billy gilmour/ james garner, as opposed to lundstrum mate 🤔 Not saying lundstrum isn't a good midfielder because he is, but i would prefer one of the 2 i mentioned 🤔.


43.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 19:21:22
Lundstrum is an upgrade on Davis and Jack IMO kamara its 50/ 50.

Bgate who should we sign midfield wise if it’s not lundstrum?


44.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 19:22:24
Not if any of them were on loan compared to lundstram on a permanent deal. Would be s terrific piece of business to get lundstram through the door he would be terrific in our midfield.


45.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 19:31:22
Kja91 I don’t think lundstram is a bad player just don’t think he will be an upgrade and I think we should sign players who will improve our team and take us to the next level .


46.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 19:34:09
Why not both, SGL? Lundstrum would be a free, permanent signing, whereas either of the other 2 would be on loan.


47.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 20:37:21
Bgate who should we sign then?


SGL I don’t think we should sign either player Billy or James on loan than lundstrum as one season for either Billy or James just isn’t good enough also you ain’t making money off them either.


48.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 21:25:24
All about opinions kja91,but lundstrum no upgrade on davis! Wee davo streets in front of lundstrum still at his age as a midfielder 👌
A fit ryan jack would also be easily in my midfield before lundstrum and kamara is a better midfielder than lundstrum, plain and simple for me mate 👍 Like i said in previous posts lundstrum in a decent midfielder, but if we're talking about an upgrade and being better than what we currently have at rangers, then we most definitely need way better than lundstrum and no sleight at all intended here regarding big lundstrum's ability 🤔.


49.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 21:26:35
Ist end of the day it’s not up to me who we sign kJ I just gave an opinion on the player that was mentioned. To be fair I think he’s better than zungu but in my opinion not at the level of Davis or kamara so would rather try and get someone better. We have scouts all over so I’m sure that they can find someone better.


50.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 21:38:49
McBurnie brings a lot more than goals and is highly regarded by football people fir his workmate and his power, he brings other people into the game and drags defenders all over the place, a bit like Dado, that's why clubs in that level value him highly, very difficult player to replace, these clubs need such as him more than they need a classical poacher, he causes problems wherever he plays, and is always a favourite of the fans and manager.


51.) 05 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 23:45:42
Zungu going back to France, Davis is 36, Jacko can't seem to shake these injuries. If we get a chance to bring Lundstrom up on a free then absolutely take it, doesn't matter who is an upgrade on whom that all subjective opinions bringing him in and perhaps one of the younger boys mentioned on loan would only enhance and benefit our midfield.


52.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 08:31:59
Good post Tom Thumb people don’t always see what a player can bring to the team.


53.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 10:27:58
If we did have scouts watching Lundstrum they couldn't have been that impressed. I thought he looked slow and kept getting caught on the ball. I've not seen much off him but never been overly impressed by what I have seen.


54.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 12:22:10
Was it not mentioned a little while back that Lundstrum would be wanting at least 50 grand a week?
🇦🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⚽️🇬🇧👍.


55.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 13:44:28
I get your post TT. This site would implode if mcburnie ever played for us.


56.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 16:09:16
Yes John, mainly because fans rarely see the big picture or understand what is required for a successful team, mcburnie will never be out of a job that’s for sure.


57.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 16:31:45
Tt that appears to be the case. Bit like olly Burke.