Rangers Rumours Archive July 12 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


12 Jul 2012 20:30:51
Ed, can you shed some light on the following please. it is my understanding that as a director of a business that it is your legal duty to make sure all decisions are taken to protect the company, and this includes the financial well being of the company, so that said, is it possible that the directors of the spl clubs who refused entry to the rangers newco could now have legal proceedings brought against them? (i think more than one or two may struggle to sleep tonight). i think what the killie chairman done by abstaining will be proved wise, what some of the rest have done is effectively put their company on the brink of collapse all because of their desire to listen to there so called supporters. {Ed039's Note - There are guidelines laid down in the Companies Act of 2006, although I am not sure how enforceable they are and in what capacity they can be enforced, but yes Stewart Gilmour came out and said that St Mirren may have had to change their vote when the SPL voted because of this, but he would obviously have received legal advice before hand)

Believable6 Unbelievable20

Company Act 2006 Section 172 I believe.
Check it out.

Agree8 Disagree10

If what you have wrote is true then why not START with SDM THEN whyte how about getting your own house in order before you look at others ????

Agree7 Disagree7

They have a ditty to act in best interest based on available evidence no evidence of so called argageden been forthcoming from anyone. So they would argue right lit IMO that they are acting not only in the best interest of thier club but the league Div 3 4 me

Agree2 Disagree0

Ed why oh f@ckin why do you put this dross on here . The guy is obviously intelligent . The guy obviously believes he is onto something but the underlying message is that he is just another rangers fan that believes that if they can't play in the spl then no one should. Is this all there is left to fight for. Depressing and pathetic.

Agree10 Disagree4

What a load of nonsense. You are clutching at straws. As long as you make 1p you are fine. You are just bitter so please stop this. Instead of paying £20k a week we will cut wages to £500 a week. Company still in business, unlike your old club.

Agree4 Disagree5

Is that not Rangers what have done and not only to our own club lets not pass the buck
Bobby

Agree4 Disagree6

Ah, I see the angle here. Let's blame all the Directors of clubs for making a decision forced onto them by years of malpractice by Rangers. I think you'll find that the companies act will provide no recourse here. Nice try, dressing up your vengence in what looks like a well worded, intellectual slant on business law though. 3/10. Must try harder.

Agree6 Disagree6

Directors of companies make decisions that they think are in the best interests of their own business and shareholders. Any attempt to take legal action against an SPL club who voted against Rangers continued membership of the SPL would be doomed to failure and a further waste of money that the newco can ill-afford right now. One of the problems that see Scottish football in it's current state was ultimately caused by the minority of so called supporters who thought by threatening a boycott on teams who voted against them would see them rule the roost and remain an SPL club. That threat has backfired big time. As has the appeal against the 12 month ban on signing players which was thrown back at the SFA who are in effect left with two options, when it is eventually dealt with in the next week or so. Suspend the necwo for a season (assuming they,re accepted into the SFL) or kick the newco out altogether. Although a Judge ruled that a 12 month ban was not within the rules that doesn't mean to say that Charles Green (under the current circumstances the newco find themselves in) wouldn't accept such a penalty. At the end of the day, irrespective of what happens to the newco, Scottish football will survive by finding it's own level which may, or may not, be a good thing. All this talk about SPL clubs going out of business may well come to pass, but what if they do the same as the old Rangers and go into administration or liquidation? Could they not therefore apply to rejoin Scottish football as a newco as well? Look at the bigger picture, newco will need to cut it's cloth accordingly like any other club and forget about 50,000 supporters turning up every other week to watch Annan, Livingston, Brechin etc. it just won't happen. Admission prices will be reduced to lower league status, TV revenue will be vastly reduced, Advertising outlays will have to be cut, sponsorship income will be slashed, it goes on and on. Getting out of the loer leagues isn't as easy as you may think, look at Dundee and Livingston or down south at great teams of the past like Leeds United, Notts Forest and Blackpool. Whatever happens it's going to be a hard slog and with all due respect the problem started with David Murray.

Agree9 Disagree3

You are making the assumption that Scottish football is all about one team again - not true. Stop being so blind. If the rest of Scottsh football die then Rangers suffer too. It won't happen anyway as clubs will be forced to cut their cloth and not before time too. Any SPL chairman can argue that the case for not allowing the newco into the SPL was a straight-forward application of the rules and if the game is a better product in 5-10 years then the decision may prove to be to best thing that ever happened to us. If you're truly a scottish football supporter then stop the "we hope you suffer too" p**h.

Agree3 Disagree5

Your only duty bound to your own share holders and if the share holders wanted it then thats what happens their is no law that says you must support criminal activity

Agree3 Disagree2

So did the chairmen of your oldco not have an obligation to apply the same logic when livi were relegated?

Agree3 Disagree2

Come on. Grasping at what you purport to be other party's wrongful decisions, in order to try to sneak a league less team into the football league? Following that logic, SPL directors should be inviting any tom dick or harry club into the league. What about MLS team?

Agree2 Disagree1

172Duty to promote the success of the company.



(1)A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to— .
(a)the likely consequences of any decision in the long term, .
(b)the interests of the company's employees, .
(c)the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, .
(d)the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment, .
(e)the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and .
(f)the need to act fairly as between members of the company. .
(2)Where or to the extent that the purposes of the company consist of or include purposes other than the benefit of its members, subsection (1) has effect as if the reference to promoting the success of the company for the benefit of its members were to achieving those purposes. .
(3)The duty imposed by this section has effect subject to any enactment or rule of law requiring directors, in certain circumstances, to consider or act in the interests of creditors of the compa

Agree3 Disagree2

Whats to say that what they done is bad for business it could be the best thing they ever done

Agree3 Disagree2

Their 'so called supporters" i.e. customers made it clear that they wouldn't buy season tickets or pay at the gates if they supported the gerrymandering of a sporting competition to a point where the model was completely corrupt. There is a much stronger argument to suggest that voting Yes would have been in breach of the regulations you are referring to.
Honestly ... always looking to point a finger and obviously sold on the idea that there is no way forward without Rangers. Yes, our positions are tough but not necessarily impossible. You guys, on the other, are in the process of being liquidated ... there's only one club's set of directors you should be pointing your finger at

Agree4 Disagree1

Would it not be wise to consider that while voting rangers in sounds the valuable decision in 1 respect, could in turn force the fans of that club away - a bigger financial hit! That is the counter argument!
Lord nelson

Agree2 Disagree3

Rangers rumours and almost all replies are from sellick fans lol more obsessed with the countries most successful team than there own, 54 and counting

Agree11 Disagree6

I'm a lifelong ger, clutching at straws m8, we've got to look after ourselves, the other clubs have to look after themselves, they're not our problem, get behind ur team forget the rest, they're on their own nowz!

Agree8 Disagree0

Football clubs "business" should be getting punters in the door. All the other income streams (prize money, sponsorhips, TV money) should be a bonus and not keeping clubs afloat. If the punters say they are not coming back if you ditch the spirit and the integrity of the game and tacitly endorse cheating by safeguarding the continuance of a flawed business model of relying on bonuses which are only "earned" by keeping company with those who do not play by the rules then you must listen to your core business, the punters in the interest of acting in the best interests of your company.

Agree1 Disagree1

To the reply that stated if you make 1p then its fine, can you tell me just how many scottish teams were in profit last year? back to school mate......

Agree2 Disagree0

So by voting against the chairman have not been acting in the best interests of the club. If they voted for the fans would boycott and leave them without additional income. Sounds like catch 22 to me.

Agree1 Disagree0

The chairmen of the spl clubs took a massive gable thinking that the newco would go into div 1 , so therefor protecting their income, but today this will backfire massively when the sfl vote rangers to the third which will trigger the spl into creating spl2 which will include rangers, sporting integrity my ar**, no more than a spl bloodthirst witchunt against rangers, bigotry? jeoloesy? or maybe both?.......

Agree3 Disagree0

ED 39, think I had this discussion with you during past week re directors duties, directors duties are contained in sections 171-177 of companies act 2006 , other directors, stakeholders would have to bring action against chairman etc, shareholders would have to bring a derivative action but this would have to be granted by the court in the first instance. Hope this helps a tad. {Ed039's Note - We did yes, I think you are right)

Agree0 Disagree0

You've got to laugh at the stupidity of people who make sweeping claims while really showing their ignorance.
The oldco went into admin and is still there right now. The newco bought the assets, which included the Rangers brand, trademarks, intellectual property, etc so that means the Rangers exists, with the history intact (can't really change that without a time machine).
All the stupid comments in this thread demonstrate nicely that all this crap is borne out of hatred and not for the good of their own clubs or scottish football.
Every Rangers fan regrets and detests the actions that brought our great club to it's present predicament but it is Scottish football that is loading the bullets of the gun.
Let's see how it falls but I am fearful for the future of the game with the lack of leadership and intellect being shown.

Agree1 Disagree1

The best interest of its members is to get rid of a club that is cheating and corrupt ... simple end of .... {Ed039's Note - How can a newco cheat and be guilty of corruption, you guys that keep telling me, not my words)

Agree1 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 16:48:53
It would appear that tomorrow will be the death knell of Scottish football.

The SPL chairmen must be panicing because they alll theough that we would be in div one and they would still get our money the following year.

It looks as if SFL clubs are not going to allow this and this totally ridiculous situation where club with attendences of 2000 and less are potentially going to lose 50,000 fans to the game.

Four years without Rangers money will see at least half a dozen SPL clubs be in the mire, because of the bloodlust of their fans. I read that the Morton poll was 670 fans. So in effect 670 fans from each of these clubs are going to deny Scottish football a lifeline. It is pathetic, tit for tat, rubbish but well done to these clubs you are about to make the worst decision of your lives.

13th July, shut the doors and put the lights out. Only in Scotland.

Believable42 Unbelievable33

Absolutely spot on mate. as an Englishman with no vested interest - cannot believe how short sighted the chairman up North are - only team we watch down here kicked out is nonsense. all the best yorkielad

Agree37 Disagree28

It may well be the death nail, but the SPL clubs put the final nail in themselves with their petty voting. How can the SPL clubs talk about sporting integrity, then vote Rangers out of the SPL, but expect the SFL not have any integrity by voting them into the SFL1, so they bounce back after 1year, so the SPL clubs continue to get TV money. Only the strongest will survive. John, Inverness

Agree31 Disagree18

Whats pathetic about it? The newco were thrown a lifeline, when they were handed a transfer embargo, but oh no D&P had to fight it & won. Now the rest of scottish football are fighting back, oh and by the way, you can put the lights out

Agree29 Disagree31

No mate "This is just the beginning" lol

Neil Lennon @ Paradise May 2011

Agree21 Disagree14

OP regardless of any other clubs attendances surely "the mighty Rangers" will still have their loyal 50,000 fans a fortnight. So what does it matter to you how many turn up for East Fife or Aberdeen or whomever? Besides wont a weaker SPL be easier for Rangers to climb when they get back? As for turning the lights out, Rangers owed Scottish Power £302.44 when they went into administration, surely Rangers should have turned them off quicker?

Agree28 Disagree15

Why have you allowed yourself to be brainwashed into thinking this will be the end of Scottish Football? The truth on this matter is that, if certain teams do eventually struggle to meet their bills etc they will simply go into administration and not liquidation like old Rangers. They will take a point reduction and then move on , not dissappear like old Rangers? This will probably benifit a large number of teams if this happens as they would then clear their debt ie Dundee(2x) and Motherwell, AS YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED BOTH CURRENTLY ALIVE AND KICKING FOOTBALLS IN SCOTTISH LEAGUES. The new proposals that are being bandied about as saviour of the game, have probably been looked at by most Premier teams DIRECTORS previously {they may have actually thought them up but couldnt get them passed by old voting system in SPL due to Celtic and Gers power base}, as they will now see a chance to go into admistration with less chance of losing their place in the top flight. The death knell is a long way off and many shrewd directors know this! hence the numbers voting that life starts again in Division 3 for NEWCO, which would allow all teams in Scottish Football to generate more money as the NEWCO make their way back to top tier. Dont be fooled that these "muppets" as Burley called them hav'nt already done their figures on numbers coming through their gates in the next few years and all they can hear is?? the till ringing in their favour. In fact the new monies being generated in lower divisions from NEWCO will allow certain teams to prosper as never before. Armageddon then becomes Utopia.....

Agree21 Disagree22

There is no bloodlust. What is happening is individual clubs not allowing themselves to be bullied into accepting another club committing numerous rule breaches without apology or remorse (ie still talking about bloodlust) and just getting away with it all effectively scot free

Agree19 Disagree23

Do you honestly believe if we accepted the ban we'd be in SPL? Or div 1? Give me a break.

Agree22 Disagree13

Hard times come on many businesses from many walks of life. Tightening the purse strings and pruning now to flourish later is are regular business practices. Scottish clubs will be fine, as are Norwegian clubs, as are Turkish clubs - in leagues without clubs the size of the old firm.

Rangers are not being punished, nor is there a bloodlust. What's happening in Scottish football is an execution of the rules which all clubs signed up to. Nothing more, nothing less.

Agree18 Disagree18

Look as your song goes..." You were Rangers Super Rangers, No one likes yous,you don't care, yous hate Celtic cos there richer, you were rangers now nae mair!" {Ed052's Note - Blah blah blah if we are no more why you on this page right now

Agree18 Disagree11

I am a rangers fan from Tullibody, next season I am going along to watch Alloa, had enough of all the anti Rangers shute! How many other fans will we lose to other teams while we are in the wilderness?

Agree13 Disagree29

Nonsense, the clubs will just have to cut costs and reduce outgoings, and get back to actually living within their means, which was the case pre-souness revolution. At this time I can see Rangers being given their Div 3 wish and not having enough time to get everything in place to be legally put into any league, which may mean sitting out a year, I have said it before, the clock is ticking and time is running out, at this time I am really concerned, if we have to sit out then i suggest the leagues will be reconstructed in any case to accomodate our team in whatever form it takes, what is your thoughts ED:? {Ed052's Note - if rangers go to division 3 there will be major cut backs. In my opinion I think Scottish football should have stuck with the 3 foreigner rule , the game is in a mess and the waste of good young talent.also when the sky deal started, teams just went all out for it. I just hope we can get the whole mess sorted out for the sake of Scottish football

Agree12 Disagree4

I hope it is the end of scottish football i go and watch it but my god when you stand back what a waste of money you spend on it , its better off if its in the bin instead of hurting my eyes week in week out untill more teams give rangers and celtic a go nothing will change no matter what happens tomorrow, gazza

Agree12 Disagree10

Read some of the foriegn reports. Scottish football is getting a real pasting.

Agree15 Disagree3

Rangers were not voted out of the SPL, they were not voted in. It's made more difficult without full disclosure of the facts that brought clubs to their decision.
You would think a club getting into financial difficulties would receive support from the association it was a member of, however, the road into administration was a calculated path chosen through deliberate acts of non payment to HMRC. what the hell was he thinking? The fact the path was deliberate would be a factor in the decision making but not the whole story. I think there is still too much going on to be able to guarantee that Rangers can complete a season in whatever league they play.
Very badly handled.

Agree16 Disagree2

Lennon and mc cartney dont have anything to worry about as regards song writing with your pish ,why dont you try the proclaimers there more your style doug t.s.o

Agree7 Disagree1

Re yorkielad:

Rangers were the only team you watched???

What planet are you on?

Hoopey67 {Ed039's Note - His IP address says Earth)

Agree8 Disagree7

To the OP. You spout nonsense. 4 years without Rangers money. You have been robbing everyone for years and your club have been liquidated, no-one else, only your club. Same club that tried to rob Dude Utd, Heart etc. Scottish football does not need Rangers money to survive and survive it will.

Agree8 Disagree7

Not the death of scottish football, the death of Rangers, big difference, we welcome the chase....no sympathy for cheats

Agree8 Disagree10

It will be D1 100%. The original point is totally valid tho, ts absolute madness that clubs with 1000 fans etc are having he final say on a club wih 50,000 week in week out, the SFA should of stepped in and taken over this situation

J {Ed001's Note - I think it is far more ridiculous that your arrogance makes you think you are better and more important simply because you have more fans!}

Agree2 Disagree4

Commit the crime, serve the time! Your club cheated and bent the rules,get over it. Better having less revenue than having cheats in the SPL. PS Rangers are deid, who cares?

Agree2 Disagree10

The post that claims the remaing spl teams will go into administration and not liquidation, and wil benifit the teams. as of april this year 2012 any company going into administration will have to pay all existing debts................look it up !!! ;-) so if that was their plan they have missed the boat. Hope the many shrewd directors as you said know this!!

Agree3 Disagree1

In purely business terms, Green has about four options as to how to use the asset base he has aquired.
The only one that wont make him a fortune is to run a footballing operation - in any of the Scottish leagues

He knows he needs at least 20,000 per home game at the reduced ticket costs for SPL 1 / 3

Needs to re-negotiate the contracts for Wallace.Alexander and all the other TUPE loyals.

Has a manager who will stab him in the back and revert to his true allies

Cant market season tickets.

Faces a cash flow brick wall

Lost the goodwill of non Rangers fans.

Branding and marketing issues totally in state of confusion - no strip -no badge -maybe not even a name we would recognise. In sales speak , the brand is damaged
The worrying thing is that he does not seem to be looking for an exit strategy!

Agree2 Disagree1

Well fellow rangers, this is were we have to back our team, we can make history here. We could win the 3rd, 2nd, 1st & Premier League in consecutive season's! Forget the rest of Scottish Football and.let's concentrate on getting us back to the top!

Agree4 Disagree3

I'm sick and so tired of all this Rangers bashing from almost everyone in Scotland. Leave us in peace to start from 3rd division, without anymore sanctions. The SFA,SPL,SFL,SKY,etc are welcome to sort it all out.

Agree6 Disagree1

LOL read your illiteracy, and not surprising as you clearly take your stance from the second worst commentator to come out of Scotland, Burley - the worst being McPherson.

"panicing"? What does this mean?"alll theough"? God you've lost me mate!

And 50000 supporters lost to the game? Are you not all meant to be so loyal? Best supporters in the land. Support them through any division?

And will the loss of TV revenue not actually hurt you? Is it only the rest that will suffer.

Deluded idiots. You even believe Sevco has a history

Agree3 Disagree5

No vested interest ? but only team we watch down here,you talking for all of Engurland then, don't think so silly person.
Tam

Agree1 Disagree3

@ "Why have you allowed yourself to be brainwashed...?"

There are so many things wrong with this post I don't know where to start. By what you have written I take it you aren't one of the high and mighty who frequent this site that has spent the last four and a bit months banging on and on about creditors and how immoral and unethical administration is as a process given they would only receive, at best, a pence in the pound offer as recompense for their losses?

This practice will "benefit a large number of teams" will it? So it would be perfectly acceptable to you for: staff and players to lose their jobs (i.e. Motherwell as a previous example); creditors to get royally bumped; our National game to be laughed at even more than it is now on the global stage; for half a dozen (a lot?) SPL teams to face a ten point deduction in the same season plus Uefa probably intervening if that were to be the case; administrators taking millions and millions out of our game that we simply cannot afford to lose; and facing no-one wanting to broadcast or be willing to sponsor a league riddled with bad debt (even the financially healthy clubs in the SPL would be affected in a great number of ways)? He may be brainwashed but your logic suggests you are brain-dead to me.

Unfortunately, you kept typing. Dundee and Motherwell didn't go into administration during a global recession previously and sponsors and broadcasters weren't threatening to pull the plug on our game because the Old Firm (THE main, and probably only, attraction for these companies to invest in our leagues) fixtures are no longer going to be there either. Do you believe that people will line up to buy these clubs once they are in administration and pump fresh money into what effectively would be a black hole? There will be no money to be made and these people are businessmen looking for a profit rather than a plaything. Rangers (although we obviously have additional unresolved issues these other clubs wouldn't have) are a clear example that Scottish football is no longer attractive to these people. Almost all of them (if they did enter administration) WOULD end up liquidated in my opinion. Furthermore, who would then be willing to give Scottish teams credit even for the morning rolls let alone banks providing overdraft facilities to keep clubs paying wages on time as the monthly incomes vary ( Dunfermline this year for example) per club depending on the number of home games.

Whilst all of this is going on what happens to our national co-efficient, the overall standard and attractiveness of the league for the fans in terms of the quality of players and the wages on offer (tying into another post on this thread re Norway and Turkey - given a mid-table Turkish side no-one had heard of before could give Boyd the wages they did), or the chances of it recovering any credibility at all within the next decade?

The only points I can agree with are the fact that Rangers SHOULD be in Division 3 and the LOWER leagues would receive a short term financial boost which would keep them ticking over for a good number of years if they spent it wisely. One last question: If, as you say, a lot of clubs enter administration in the coming seasons (with the distinct possibility of liquidation), how many lower league clubs could currently meet the entry requirements for the SPL in order to replace them and how many would actually want to? This mess is just going to get bigger and bigger and we, as a footballing country, are going to suffer for DECADES to come. By the time the youth are at a decent enough level to compete our standing will be no better than the 'minnows' in the lowest pots that, lets face it, we struggle to beat just now anyway. It would/will be a long, long way back.

Shall I plug you back into the original Matrix now so you can enjoy your supposed utopia or do you want to come and see how grim Zion looks?

Brian

Agree3 Disagree2

Good to see you have your sense of humour back ED.

hoopey67

Agree1 Disagree1

The rest survived when you were getting crowds of less than 10,000 turning up at Ibrox during the 80's pre Murray/Souness.In fact Scottish Football was in a much better state then than it is presently. {Ed039's Note - Thats when football was about 22 men on the field and players didnt care about money I'm afraid that doesnt exist anymore)

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 19:19:33
strong rumor going about green still involved with whyte..

Believable24 Unbelievable16

Think about it, whyte gets HIS team into administrate, then Charles Green appears out of nowhere, then is sold all the stadia for 1.5m although worth 100m approx..

something fishy going on, always gone with if it smells like a fish and looks like a fish ....more than not it is a fish

Agree13 Disagree4

Green, Whyte Duff & Duffer - they are all connected.

Agree14 Disagree4

Emm is that all your going to write - Where you getting this from? Did you just suddenly wake up and say oh think I will post a comment to try and rake up some more muck!

Agree7 Disagree8

Maybe that was the Brown secret? from green about whyte being the owner and green being the patsy

bill

Agree6 Disagree3

You forgot Murray surley it was his Idea to sell to whyte

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 15:35:40
The Board of Clyde Football Club has received the papers in advance of tomorrows SFL meeting and will consider the Heads of Terms supplied. We continue to have the same fundamental concerns about this process, however the overriding concern is a point which we have made to the SFL.

We have received absolutely no information on the organisation Sevco Scotland Ltd whom we are being asked, and encouraged, to vote straight into the top division of the SFL under resolution 2 and possibly into SFL 3 under Resolution 1. We have no business plan, list of directors, details of ownership, statement of capital adequacy or any proposals relating to the provision of any similar information in the near future. David Longmuir has clearly stated that he will distribute all the information he has got or is able to distribute.

Whilst the notion that there is a leap of faith to be taken in terms of some of the matters, there can be no leap of faith with something as fundamental as knowing who is being admitted to the league. The very fact that there is no information of any kind being made available on this company undermines the authorities efforts to direct the new entrant to SFL 1. It is actually impossible for any member of the SFL to make an objective assessment of the proposals under Resolutions 1 and 2 and could be seen as irresponsible to support either proposal in such a void of information.

It is our hope that some credibility can be introduced to this process and we would ask that whoever holds information on Sevco Scotland Ltd provides a full and detailed pack to David Longmuir in order that even at the eleventh hour the SFL clubs are given reason to support any Resolutions that they might wish to vote on. We have to assume that the SFA and SPL hold such information otherwise they would not press so heavily for entry to SFL 1.

If a leap of faith is to be taken, then in the current circumstances it will be taken blindly and the only logical outcome of taking that kind of risk would be to enter them to SFL 3, where, should any subsequent issues arise they will be contained within the lowest league rather than disrupting the top flight of the SFL.

The other matter that is entirely outside the gift of the SFL is the need for the SPL clubs to confirm that contrary to what Neil Doncaster stated on their behalf, the SPL will meet its obligations to the SFL under the Settlement Agreement.

Believable18 Unbelievable0

Seems a fair statement. It does point to NewCo having no league to play in next year thought :-(

Agree10 Disagree3

Lot`s of Tom Kite doing the rounds atm.
If I told you guys that I had a certainty running on Saturday at the horses would you believe me?

Agree5 Disagree1

Clyde want all information on sevco, Bomber wants all information on sevco but cant get it, Bomber worked for Clyde recently. 1+1=. Sorry it was too much of a coincidence not to mention. Not saying Bomber still has friends at Clyde, but with this soap opera who knows. basket-case.

Agree1 Disagree8

12 Jul 2012 15:28:26
Nacho novo was at Murray park today according to a relation that plays for the under 17's. Nacho man returning?

Believable10 Unbelievable22

Is that right pal beleave me or not but the girl wee nacho gose with is a very good frend of my sister and what u have just sed is alot of bull nacho is in spain were hes been for the last 4 months so dont say hes signing coz hes not id love it to be true

Agree6 Disagree10

I posted this 2 weeks ago and was shunned. Know some of his wives relatives in Greenock and they told myself the same thing.

Agree2 Disagree7

Another has been come crawling bk , he can take a run and jump he'll no b welcome bk at ibrox cause he's mince ? Airport bear

Agree10 Disagree13

Airport Bear ,
i remember when ur posts were upbeat and funny i know it's been a tough time but we are still the people!. Div 3 here we come.

CJM

Agree2 Disagree4

If he went with a good friend of ur sister u would know he's been in Warsaw playing since jan not in Spain ya muppet

Agree9 Disagree0

Novo won us the spl so many times ya nutter prop would have got us the ufea cup if he got the start jog on , big bad baz

Agree2 Disagree5

Sorry fellow bears but got to agree novo was mince with a few lucky strikes here and there but still W.A.T.P ... Wee Willie
Bouncy bouncy bouncy all the way to the third!

Agree3 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 14:50:34
{Ed052's Note - Condolences to the family of Joe Mcbride. R.I.P Joe

Believable55 Unbelievable12

Cheers ED052 and all decent bears, Joe McBride was one of the gentlemen of our sport. RIP Joe..... Timalloy

Agree22 Disagree4

Totally agree - even as a Rangers fan you can recognise a legend when you see one and Joe certainly was a legend. Condolences to his family, Football has lost a good man.

Agree18 Disagree4

How and why on earth can 5 people disagree with an Ed's note of condolence? this is a sad sad time for Joe McBrides family. R.I.P Joe
frankiebhoy {Ed052's Note - never mind them mate. Just total scum

Agree19 Disagree6

How can any person disagree with this.Will Scotland ever be free of this hatred and bigotry.
Tam

Agree16 Disagree7

Respect to rangers fans giving respect to joe mcbride ,true supporters and best of luck in these troubled times,think as Celtic fan I will miss old firm games and banter in work and pubs..I now you have many honest supporters like our selfs...but the shame of people who disagree to the above post have no place in football wether that be Celtic park or ibrox

Agree21 Disagree4

What kind of a country we live in when 5PEOPLE disagree about your remarks about the late joe mc bride thanks ed for your remarks {Ed052's Note - the man was and always be a celtic and football legend

Agree17 Disagree4

Those disagreeing are pathetic as a gers fan of many years I am aware of the kindness of Joe Mcbride to many people you folks are an embarrassment to the club

Agree19 Disagree4

R.I.P Joe McBride, great player, great man...

Agree18 Disagree4

Shame on all you who hit the disagree button hold your heads in shame and grow up and get a life R.I.P joe from all the sane rangers fans

Agree17 Disagree5

Discussing hitting the disagree button that's why no other club want or likes use... RI.P JOE
urn family will never walk alone

Agree14 Disagree5

So 5 people have made your mind up that we are all bigoted, careless scum, get real mate.
R.I.P Joe McBride

Agree11 Disagree5

Tried to post regarding this but it never got put up try again how and why would five people diagree with this post hang your heads in shame you lot you make me sick i as a rangers fan would like to pass on my condolences to the Mcbride family R.I.P Joe ;;; cooperboy

Agree8 Disagree3

How do you know its Rangers fans who disagree any clown can press a buuton and by the spelling on here theres planty of them {Ed052's Note - It could be anyone mate, you said it (clowns)

Agree9 Disagree4

Celtic fan. Always glad to see good football fans. (5 disagree) We've got our own share of wee w*nkers as well. RIP Joe. Hail Hail. And to all the good Gers. Best of luck!! I won't hold the NewCo against you for too long. Bet the wee w*nkers will.

Shug

Agree10 Disagree4

The guy who posted saying no other club wants us you are as bad as the guys who hit the disagree button read the posts the rangers fan are enraged by those guys but you have condemed us all to you and the clowns who hit that button drag yourselfs into the 21st century and join the human race ;;;;; cooperboy

Agree9 Disagree2

Condolences to mr mcbrides family from a ger sorry to hear the news

Agree2 Disagree1

Are those who disagree really Gers fans? Im sure anyone can press the button n God knows there is enough people who want to cause us as much trouble as possible and another thing there is more Selik and all the fans they have goaded into hating us on here than Gers fans. So what is stopping any of those diddys hitting the disagree button to rake up more sh%te! {Ed052's Note - could be anyone mate.Just people being total clowns mate.

Agree3 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 13:47:36
Just seen removal vans going into David Healy's house

Seems he is moving on too

Believable20 Unbelievable3

That's no biggy is it, couldney kick a baw anyway.

Agree22 Disagree11

Pathetic repsonse. OK he generally dissappointed during his time at Ibrox but we need every one we can keep at the moment and DH would be plenty good enough for Div1 or far more likely Div 3.

Wish folk would stop knocking the players that leave. it really lacks class!

Agree10 Disagree7

People are entitled to an opinion as are you I personally agree he may do a job but we may not get the chance to find out.

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 13:34:17
Dumbarton deny they have decided to vote newco Rangers into First Division. Projected vote now stands at 17-1 for Div 3 (STV)

Believable19 Unbelievable9

11 clubs still to give an indication, appears clear cut.

Agree4 Disagree4

Still to declare: Albion Rovers, Alloa Athletic, Brechin City, Dumbarton, East Stirlingshire, Forfar Athletic, Hamilton, Montrose, Queen of the South, Queen's Park

Agree4 Disagree1

Div-3 bekons. Div-3 season ticket prices too I hope. I personally would only pay on a game by game basis now and I'm very unlikely to go to many games.

Agree8 Disagree19

And the 1 is contingent on restructuting. Looking more like a whitewash, unless Regan has more ticks up his sleeve.

Agree5 Disagree5

Div 3 Div ticket prices, game by game, so much for not walking away.What happened to WE ARE THE PEOPLE.Seem's it s only the tim's that back their team
tam

Agree22 Disagree15

Div 3 season ticket means more money to spend on pies.

Agree18 Disagree2

Looking from the outside. Scotland is run by little people making big desicions that will cripple your economy. Total self indulgance. A financial and points penalty would have sorted your League better.

Agree20 Disagree15

"A financial and points penalty would have sorted your League better."
--

Too much hatred and resentment for that I'm afraid, they voted in the interests of Sporting Integrity then went on to make a complete mockery of that by blackmailing SFL chairmen into voting for division 1, total and utter hypocrisy by the chairmen of the SFL clubs.

3rd division please, our club will survive not so sure about many others... good luck.

One other point, if Rangers no longer exist, why is the obsession still so string in so many?

Agree21 Disagree11

What are you guys going on about. Bomber has already told you all that it's a done deal for Rangers in SFL Div 1. LOL

Agree4 Disagree10

STV understands Brechin City will vote yes to Rangers in Division One because they agree with reconstruction proposals 17 - 2

Agree0 Disagree1

Tims that bag their team tam? I take it you forgot the mass exodus from the celtic fams when mowbary was manager?

Agree2 Disagree1

I do love the statement "our club will survive not sure about many others". Your club hast not survived, it's gone and replaced by another company. Under your logic how will every other club not survive in one form or another.

Agree6 Disagree4

If rangers pander to the corruption (by starting next season in div 1), I, for one, genuinely wouldn't be back. "Sporting integrity" as all the armchair scottish football fans put it, would mean we end up in div 3 and start again. What if we went to div 1 and our depleted squad meant we couldn't manage promotion for 3 or 4 seasons anyway? Oh, thats right... The SFA are drawing up a revamp of the Scottish Leagues so that 3 teams from Div 1 get promoted for the next two seasons, Rangers can surely manage a top 3 finish? Farcical!

Agree4 Disagree0

Tims dont do walking away, make laugh, their atendances at start of the 1990' were poor to say the least, (Note Before EBT's). Only a f##King fool would part with money to Mr Compo Green and his slimy gang!!

Agree4 Disagree2

Tam you must be having a laugh, the san giro was empty last season use had all gave up until we blew our lead , short memorys from the "self proclaimed greatest fans in the world " and yer right bi man we are the people and always will be

Agree5 Disagree3

"Div-3 bekons. Div-3 season ticket prices too I hope. I personally would only pay on a game by game basis now and I'm very unlikely to go to many games."
You must have missed Ally say "We (RFC - in Liquidation) don't do walking away." Think this was not that long after blowing a 15-point lead (which has been conveniently forgotten by the masses (can I use that word on here?)). That line is right up there with "For every fiver Celtic spend we will spend a tenner," which actually should have been "For every fiver Celtic spend we will BORROW a tenner, and we'll pay it back at 1p in the £."

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 12:41:18
If the rumour being that Ortiz was released because Green couldnt honour the level of salary that Ortiz had originally had before transfer, the question I would ask is how much are guys like mcculloch etc who have transferred getting paid?

Believable10 Unbelievable4

I think they didn't want him nothing to do with salary ,he was basic bad sighing

Agree12 Disagree3

That's the wrong question. Their pay will be as before, for now. The question is - how much is Green prepared to pay them? or will he sell them, release them or attempt to negotiate a lower pay?

Agree6 Disagree1

Most players would probably have a relegation wage drop (most would accept it as they woodnt dream of gers being relegated) so 4 division wage drops could see their wages drop by like 80% by playing in division 3?

Agree0 Disagree0

To the 2nd reply a team with only first team players and no money to buy new one, let got a player go for nothing? Rangers wont be playing in the SPL next season so if hes bad what standard of player are they looking for?

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 12:45:09
Where is all the money going now?

I mean if I went into the rangers megastore and bought something, does the money go to newco? oldco? JJB? Dick Advocaat? Celtic?

What about the deals regarding the catering?

Anyone have a clue?

Believable14 Unbelievable3

Nobody knows, or has done for decades. That's the issue.

Agree9 Disagree0

No idea mate, im pretty confused aswell. I'd assume though, that the merchandising etc was part of the 5.5 million that Charles Green bought all assets etc for. I'd guess Rangers megastore profits go to charles greens newco.

Agree7 Disagree3

Absolutely nothing is owned by Rangers. But some guys are still making profits.
Where's the £750k currently in the fighting fund? Paying for buffet lunches?

Agree11 Disagree1

Certainly aint newco. They have no deals in place, no strip. Nothing.

Agree9 Disagree2

All oldco licensing/outsourcing deals were terminated by D&P, similar to the Ticketus season ticket contract for next few seasons. Up to SEVCO to renegotiate new deals where possible.

Agree7 Disagree0

It will go to whoever owns the retailer. Which might be a franchise or it might be connected to Rangers old or new.

OK, I don't know.

Agree1 Disagree0

I wouldnt be so sure... jjb bought the rights to rangers football club brand name if sevco want to use that name they might need permission off jjb rather that renegotiate a new deal

Agree3 Disagree2

Whats the deal with all the sponsorship deals etc? not to jump the gun and assume we're guaranteed to be playing at all in the coming season, but doesn't a new badge/strip/sponsors need to be created since we are now a 'newco' and no longer rfc? for every strip bought i have no clue where that money goes, and thats worrying!

Agree2 Disagree1

I know a girl that works in the superstore. the money goes to JJB. The staff STILL dont know if they are being kept on once liquidation kicks in.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 12:21:21
SFL clubs currently opposed 16-2 to plans for Rangers in the First Division

12 July 2012 11:13 BST

Several SFL sides say they will vote no to a newco playing in Scotland's second tier next season. Pic: SNS Group
Charles Green's "newco Rangers" will find out on Friday, July 13 whether or not they will be granted a place in the Scottish Football League for the 2012/13 season.

Current clubs will be given the vote on whether to allow the team into the league, as well as deciding whether to allow the Ibrox side straight into the First Division, in exchange for compromise with the Scottish Premier League on league reconstruction.

Several teams in the SFL's three divisions have already stated their objection to allowing a newco to play in Scotland’s second tier.

A majority vote is needed to admit the newco into the SFL into the league setup, with vacancies normally seeing new teams enter at the Third Division stage.

The stances of SFL clubs should not be taken as a guaranteed list of how they will vote on July 13. With the league's board attempting to negotiate a compromise agreement with the SPL, the positions of many clubs could change before they are asked to cast their vote.

This page will be updated as more clubs make their positions known.

KNOWN LIKELY VOTES TO DATE

First Division entry: Dumbarton, Stenhousemuir(#)

(#) depending on conditions over league restructuring being met.

Third Division entry: Annan Athletic, Arbroath, Ayr United, Berwick Rangers, Clyde, Cowdenbeath, Dunfermline Athletic, East Fife, Elgin City Falkirk, Greenock Morton, Partick Thistle, Peterhead, Raith Rovers, Stirling Albion, Stranraer

Undeclared: Albion Rovers, Alloa Athletic, Brechin City, East Stirlingshire, Forfar Athletic, Hamilton, Livingston, Montrose, Queen of the South, Queen's Park

Believable9 Unbelievable2

Well fellow Bears looks like we're getting what we want for a change. :))
Good News at last!!

Agree9 Disagree3

Morton will vote NO. No SFL1 for Sevco.
Statement on their website "Under the current SFL rules, any Club making an application for membership should be admitted to the 3rd Division. I personally see no reason to make any exception to that at this time and would therefore vote accordingly. "

Agree8 Disagree0

Sevco not wanting the 1st is a bit like the scorpion and the toad

Agree2 Disagree0

Regan will now tell SFL there has to be unanimous majority against SFL1 for it to carry and that he's giving Rangers newco a vote.

Agree3 Disagree4

"Regan will now tell SFL there has to be unanimous majority against SFL1 for it to carry and that he's giving Rangers newco a vote."
--

Regan can't tell SFL anything, he has unsuccessfully tried blackmail already. 3rd division as the Gers fans want... Good luck everyone else.

Agree9 Disagree0

If it aint 3rd div FITBA HERE IS DEFO OVER.Goodluck everybody else? you are making the same mistake as you did a year ago reading the bull#####,in the rags.A new era is dawning,Celtic,may well run away with the SPL,BUT IF IM RIGHT,and i usually am,3 or 4 clubs will be so close for 2nd place, crowds will increase,bright new scots kids will at last get a chance just like the pre SOUNESS|MURRAY DAYS.Remember those days?Rangers were crap,9 years with no title,3 GOOD TO VERY GOOD TEAMS VYING FOR THE LEAGUE,PUMPING,BAYERN,REAL MADRID,BARCELONA,WERDER BREMEN,MONACO,AJAX.And when newco,come back you might have a NEW charlie adam,ross mccormack,scott dobbie ready to put newco on the map.Or you get voted in to the 1st div and Celtic fans ARE PROVED 100% CORRECT Scottish football is corrupt,and they will do a Bryan Adams for you............timmy tim.

Agree2 Disagree1

Is it even guaranteed that Newco will be admitted to SFL 1 or 3. Is the first vote not to accept Newco into SFL? If rejected(possible) second vote null and void. Would be a vote for Cove/A.N.Other.

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 11:28:39
"Arbroath say newco Rangers must go into Div 3. That makes it 15-2 in projected votes of SFL clubs at Friday's meeting according to STV"

That means the majority required for D3 will be reached and only the SFL board intervening and overruling the clubs will prevent us playing in D3 next season.

Believable8 Unbelievable2

I'll just be pleased to see football at Ibrox in any division at the moment. After all at this moment in time, we have no licence, not enough players to make up a squad and a tribunal waiting to possibly suspend us for a season - and a big thank you to the RFF for wasting supporters money on that challenge to the transfer embargo. Give yourselves a pat on the back for that one lads because if we are suspended you'll be receiving your fair share of the blame for it!

Oh and not forgetting the fact that in a few weeks BDO might be reversing the sale of the club to the Green consortium and other issues.

So I for one will happily go and watch us take on the likes of Peterhead or Elgin and just be glad we are still in existence.

Agree19 Disagree2

Good. I think we could all do with a break from each other for a while.
Sorry to hear about pasing of Joe McBride RIP.
A blue bear

Agree18 Disagree1

Elgin City say they will vote for Rangers to go into Division Three. Projected votes now 16-2 for Rangers in Div 3.

Agree6 Disagree1

The Rangers will play in SFL1 this season no matter what the diddy clubs say tomorrow. Trust the SFA to do the right thing ;-)

Agree1 Disagree17

But you (i take it you mean rangers) are not in excistance anymore Rangers are dead anyone saying that they are not is speaking nonsense because newco or sevco or whatever are NOT rangers

Agree9 Disagree13

Careful of calling teams diddy clubs remember yous could be a diddy club next season

Agree8 Disagree4

Does it upset you that we are still rangeres despite being owned by a different company now? Aw sorry...

Agree8 Disagree3

If 16 - 2 becomes 20+ - 2 then there won't be enough teams to form a breakwaway SPL2, so the D3 for next season will be guaranteed irrespective how p***** off the SFA and SPL might be.

Agree4 Disagree1

Rangers won't be in SFL1 as things stand. But they may well be in SPL2 if Regan and Doncaster get their ways.

Interesting that these guys reckon there's time to set up SPL2. Every other proposal seems to need more than one season's notice.

Agree2 Disagree0

Rangeres,that,s a great name for newco love it will catch on no prob,s garlar07

Agree2 Disagree1

Not convinced NewCO FC wont be administration before long.

Agree3 Disagree0

"But you (i take it you mean rangers) are not in excistance anymore Rangers are dead anyone saying that they are not is speaking nonsense because newco or sevco or whatever are NOT rangers"
--

If they don't exist why do you feel the need to comment of their rumours page?

Now and forever obsessed!

Agree4 Disagree1

It's now 16-2 with one abstention Ayr Utd and one not eligible, Dundee.

Agree1 Disagree1

SPL2 it is then. The SFA will not allow us to drop any further than Division 1 so no need to worry. Dont listen to these obsessed Celtic fans

Agree0 Disagree3

12 Jul 2012 10:57:26
McCulloch staying at Rangers to develop his coaching skills.

An ideal opportunity I would have thought.

Believable6 Unbelievable9

Is he driving the coach? Would have thought a people carrier more appropriate these days.

Agree21 Disagree6

He stayed at Rangers cos it suited him Hes too old to go anywhere else and he will now follow his coaching ambition Yet the fans hail him a hero who didn t walk away but slated the other players who left to look after their careers Double standards

Agree12 Disagree6

"Yet the fans hail him a hero who didn t walk away but slated the other players who left to look after their careers Double standards"
--

So praising Jig for staying and the rest for leaving is double standards. When will you people give it a rest?

Agree9 Disagree0

Jig is a legend> many a part-timer has given him a hard time over the years, yet he is Rangers to the core and always gives his all and would play for free if he had to. He's gonna be our captain next season, so let's get behind the team guys. {Ed052's Note - well said mate

Agree7 Disagree3

OP here. Yes, it suits him. But what's wrong with that? It suits Ally and it suits some of the younger players. Isn't that what you/we want? Players who WANT to be there?

Or would you prefer a team full of lower English league loanees who would rather get p!ssed every night, and frees from SFL1 clubs?

Agree2 Disagree0

He stayed cos there's a more than good chance that come the start of the season he'll be the player manager! Bets anyon

Agree2 Disagree4

To be fair jig stayed on he loves the club as for div 3 we should start again and rebuild too much underhanded by the big wigs deciding the celtic fans could be right this mob coudnt organise a raffle makes the newco look bad bad press if we are begging for division 1 give us div 3 and all scottish fans are happy its only causing an anti rangers backlash all fans love their clubs its the bread and butter fans who are sufferring this situation has been handled all wrong mr green should apply for div3

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 09:49:42
In the name of sporting integrity & transparency will all SFL clubs be announcing their away ticket prices before they vote for which league Rangers Newco will be in?

The Pilot!

Believable6 Unbelievable4

Yes. This would be a good one. Will Dundee United now be charging Celtic fans double to make up for losing our inflated ticket prices?

Agree12 Disagree5

They'll be the same as the home tickets, its in the rules.

Agree6 Disagree12

Dearer tickets due to behaviour issues,which needed extra police and stewards and because realy they didnt want you there.
Maybe now there will be no more sectarian songs to put up with and we may even become civilised enough to allow alcohol back into our grounds like most other countries.Trying to remember the catalyst that stopped this in first place,seem to recall horses and police charges ? maybe should had dear tickets at that time to stop all the so called "fans" putting the scottish football name in papers all over the world for the wrong reasons. Manchester people wondering if they maybe should have asked that ticket prices be trebled to allow for more police maybe for army involvment too ? (joke). Costs seem to go through roof when a certain team are rumoured to be coming wonder why? is it thier caring nature,their jovial fun laden songs, their matey banter, their family friendly songs, their all round goodpeople image.?? nope cant see that one ? wonder if the past will follow the future, i and many millions of fans across the globe hope not. No more bigotry etc ?lets hope.

Agree17 Disagree10

In the interest of transparency, why don't you buy your season tickets now and see how many of the 40,000 season ticket holders from last season are willing to show their loyalty to the club this season coming....5,000? 10,000?

Agree8 Disagree10

In the interest of transparency, lets see how many sell outs there are at SPL matches this season. Remember, all the SPL clubs expecting celtic's happy, family friendly, jovial, world renound away support on rememberance weekend may have a few empty seats... Well for the protest against the british war dead before the match atleast.

Agree10 Disagree5

"5,000? 10,000?"

10000 would be a heroic effort!

Agree3 Disagree2

In response to post four i was a coach driver who drove your so well behaved dundee utd fan over to rome in the old europian cup clah with roma the toilrt was ripped out of coach they fought with each other on coach and we had the police meet the coach in hull had to put them on a hired coach to get home as the company i drove for refused to take them any further so please get of your whiter than white horse every team has its problems not just the old firm as for songs yes i as a rangers fan would love to see these old songs put to bed but also the song that are sung about plane crashes the ibrox disaster the death of old firm players so again yes we have problems but dont give me its only yous lot not us and for the sake of sporting integrity div three for us

Agree14 Disagree7

Well if the RFF step up is anything to go buy, would expect less than a 1,000.

Agree4 Disagree1

90% wanted 3rd it will be interesting to see how many of that 90% renew their tickets demanding third then walking away would be the biggest joke of all time

Agree2 Disagree4

Will Aberdeen fans stop singing about Ian Durrants leg while we are gone?
Will the green brigade allow the team to wear the poppy on remembrance day?
Small minorities ruin it for everyone and every club has them.

Agree12 Disagree4

Lol at the poster saying how alcohol may be allowed back in and good behaviour may devlop. I think I remember one of the catalysts was actually Hugh Dallas gettin smashed in the head with coins because the tims couldn't handle getting beat.

Agree9 Disagree5

In response to the driver of a bus of UTD fans heading to a European game in Roma, It must have been a "mini bus" as there were only around couple hundred of them there. As for whiter than white, did they not also get a big pay out from UEFA for their fans behaviour a few years later? Everyone knows that football clubs the world over have eleimintes of thugs supporting their clubs? and it is also noted that most clubs since the 80s since your going back that far have managed to !get their house!(not big) in order, especially unruly fans and bigots? unfortunatly the old Rangers right upto going "defunct", were getting fined for their fans behaviours? hopefully driver you are not one of them ? and hopefully when the NEWCO return they do not return with the unruly/bigoted element.

Agree5 Disagree3

I'm not going to miss the 'we're whiter than white' arguments of the intellectually challenged.
This is largely where our problems lie in Scottish football, that has led us to this precipice. Too many idiots ready to put the boot in with no basis in reality or understanding of the consequence.

Agree2 Disagree4

Doesn't really matter what side the bus was. Just please accept thugs exist within your fan base. They ripped out a toilet and had to be dealt with by the please. Please find some contrition in your reply poster.

Agree1 Disagree1

Not going to miss what? reading that we had and will probably still have a number of complete and utter bigoted fools who will never change their behaviour no matter the consequences that would arise for our team.
The only idiots that i seem to keep appearing here are the ones that hid their heads in the sand and will "folllow follow" NEWCO not understanding or realising what consequences actually are? and it wasnt just Scottish Football that thought we were bigots anf thugs uefa fined us ? and do you recall all the media coverage after Manchester? get a grip.

Agree3 Disagree1

Im a rangers fan to be honest no fans are perfect if came across a few idiots at ibrox in the past foootball should be football not about a king and his nephew squabbling over a throne ok some of the songs were bad times change move on i have loads of freinds who support celtic we have banter not hatred i always found it was fans from outside glasgow that caused the bother mouthing off you get idiots on both sides the new rangers songs are healthy im sorry what has happened to rangers and regret any bad feeling that has been caused we are just the fans didnt have a say hope the fans of other clubs will see our point time to move on time to build bridges i think

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 08:27:44
Rangers in crisis: Administrators report reveals Charles Green bought assets worth £110m for just £1.5m

THE price paid by Charles Green for Rangers included a £1.5million fire sale for Ibrox Stadium, Murray Park and the club's valuable car park.
The knockdown value was approved by administrators Duff & Phelps despite them valuing the assets at three times that price just two weeks earlier.
And when Sir David Murray sold the club to Craig Whyte two years ago, he had the same land, bricks and mortar assets valued at £110MILLION.
The huge collapse in the value of what is effectively left of once proud Rangers FC was revealed in a report by Duff & Phelps to creditors yesterday.
And the difference between the valuations compared with what they actually sold for has left fans scratching their heads.
Andy Kerr of the Rangers Supporters Assembly said: 'This sale price of £1.5million shows Ibrox, Murray Park and the Albion car park were sold for a song.
'It will be hard for fans to understand how more than £100million can be turned into a fraction of that.'
The report revealed that Green also factored in a fee of £2.75million to buy the contracts and registrations of the club's players, which would have been worth £25million in an open market.

Believable6 Unbelievable4

It is not hard to understand, the stadium itself has no realisable value without an SPL football team in Europe filling it. Without this, the stadium is a white ( asbestos) elephant incurring 3 million demolition costs, leaving only the land it sits on as a sellable asset. Even the frontage restricts the options for the development of the site, in todays land market, its worth next to zero.
As for the 100 million book price, this is a replaceable value and not a realisable value.

Anorak.

Agree11 Disagree2

Nonsense that a £100m price tag has been put on the assets. If true wouldn't property companies have been banging on D&P's door to offer considerably more than £5.5m?

(@Anorak it's not white but with bad eyesight it might appear to be an elephant)

Agree5 Disagree0

What value would it have had to a property company that could then rent back to a major Glasgow football team suddenly without a ground to play on?

A hell of a lot more than £1.5MM. you could charge more than that in rent a year + all the other options for concerts etc

On top of that, state of the art training facilities that could be adapted for any sport. I think the administrators will have some serious questions here once the liquidatars start their examination of this administration

Agree4 Disagree1

How is this news? Everyone already knew the supposed value of assets and how much green bought the club for. I say good luck to him. Brilliant piece of business. It's now in his own interests to increase the value of the club. Can only be a good thing surely?

Agree1 Disagree1

Wrong Anorak D&P's own valuation which was made this year had Ibrox and Murray park down at about £110million your not accusing them of false accounting are you

Agree0 Disagree0

"I think the administrators will have some serious questions here once the liquidatars start their examination of this administration"

Like what? Why didn't you sell for a higher price? Because there was only one bidder!

Agree1 Disagree3

To all those badmouthing Green for gaining these assets on the cheap, remember how much Walter Smith and his consortium of moneymen offered for those same assets, hardly more than the Green offer.

Why didn't they value Ibrox higher?

Agree7 Disagree1

As a Rangers fan the cheaper the assets were purchased the better, it leaves more in the pot for investment.

The issue is why did D&P enter into a binding agreement wrt liquidation and the fee. IMO they should have waited and allowed others to bid once the CVA had been rejected, surely that would have been the best way to ensure the greatest return for the creditors.

IMO it obvious for all to see that the £5.5M figure was worked out by determining all the costs to date, to make it look as if the only way creditors would see a return is to vote fir a CVA, surely that is a dereliction of duty.

Agree4 Disagree1

The question shouldn't be on the valuation - the question should have been that, in the best interests of the creditors, why didn't they auction off the assets individually and get a greater price, rather than doing an irrevocable deal with CG?

Agree4 Disagree1

The front of the building can be converted to luxury flats with new build round about it and asbestos can easy be rectified its worth a lot more than 1.5 million and any property developer would be entitled to grants to maintain the face

Agree2 Disagree2

I thought be bought assets that are worthless for 5.5 million.

Agree0 Disagree1

Wrong Anorak: D&P's own valuation which was made this year had Ibrox and Murray park down at about £110million your not accusing them of false accounting are you..............................

I explained how the book evaluation was made AND they were not made by D&P, they simply lift them from the accounts.
Murray Park cost 14 million to develop, what do you think it is worth, these are purpose built assets with a limited value on the open market.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

Demolishing a structure containing asbestos is not easy or cheap.

Anorak.

Agree0 Disagree0

Its not easy or cheap but when your dealing in buildings worth millions its cheap unless its instillation boarding then trust me its not a big deal

Agree0 Disagree0

Can you imagine what would happen to the demolition company if it ever came about to demolish the main stand at ibrox ,were not talking aout the red road flats here , i almost got a job on them in the 60 s glad i didnt with the poisonous materials they were using then doug t.s.o

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 03:44:37
RANGERS were last night told the vital vote on their SFL future is balanced on a knife-edge.

And it could be a WEEK before their fate is decided.
The 30 clubs meet tomorrow to decide if Gers are dumped into Division One or Three.
But Livingston chairman Gordon McDougall said: “It’s very close — it could go either way.”
SFL Board members including chief executive David Longmuir met at Hampden yesterday ahead of the vote.
A major enticement for SFL clubs to vote Gers into the First Division is a proposal for a 16-team SPL within three years.
But details of how that would be implemented remain sketchy and the clubs fear they could vote Gers in then see SPL clubs veto the restructure.
McDougall added: “David Longmuir is sending a document detailing the benefits to all the clubs and we will go from there.
“There will be comments on the 16-team SPL in the paper. Whether or not that will be enough to persuade people to allow Rangers into the First Division is up to the individual clubs.
“For me, nothing much has changed. I still favour the newco joining in the Third Division.
“That’s what their manager has said he wants and it’s quite clearly what their fans want.
“I’m not at all against certain aspects of league reconstruction. What I am against is Rangers being railroaded into the First Division with one issue piggy-backing on the other.”
Another SFL chairman said: “They’re offering us a 16-team SPL but the SPL clubs haven’t even been asked whether they would agree to it.
“Yet we’re supposed to vote Rangers into the First Division on the strength of this and then trust them to keep their promise.”
SFL clubs, who could land a seven-figure cash bonanza if Gers are parachuted into Division One, will be asked to consider Rangers’ application to join them tomorrow.
They will then consider whether they or the Board vote on which division to place Gers in.
But some clubs — headed by Clyde — aren’t happy with the wording of Longmuir’s resolutions.
That could lead to another delay in the vote —- just 15 days before the new season kicks off.
McDougall, who suggested Dundee and Dunfermline could play-off for the right to replace Gers in the SPL, warned: “This has gone on for far too long as it is. We need an answer because we’re all tired of it.”

Believable7 Unbelievable2

Play-off!! Now they are really making up the rules as they go along. Surely there is a way of resolving who takes place of a team which cannot compete in the leage into which they were initially designated? If not, and nothing about the SPL and SFA seems to surprise me at the moment, what precedent is there elsewhere?

Agree0 Disagree0

Just out of curiosity where is this seven figure cash bonanza coming from?

& what would it have been spent on if not for this?

Agree0 Disagree0

The SFA/SPL board need to stand down. It seems to me they are not listening to what 90% of the fans want.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 01:53:47
Heard a rumour tonight that a bid of £12.5 m will be made over weekend, by a new bidder, apparently a single bidder, no consortium.
There have been suggestions that Green may go as he doesn't believe that fans will buy tickets with him in charge.

The bid will be reduced to £10m if we are in div three.

Don't know if anyone heard Bomber saying that Green had said something to him which he couldn't repeat. I believe it was along the lines of - if you think Whyte screwed everybody when in admin, that you ain't seen nothing yet, compared with what Green will do.

I am sceptical about this as don't see why Bomber would not be making that public.

Believable3 Unbelievable7

Yes because green is guna tell a so called rangers die hard that kind of info and if he did say it then maybe bomber aint as big a rangers fan as he claims to be

Agree8 Disagree1

Wrong... he said "i couldn't care less if this whole place turned to dust next week"

Agree1 Disagree0

The last post is correct I know this for a fact. The dust comment is exactly what was said !!

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 01:46:29
Ok, how much more is there?
LEGAL stuff

HMRC voted down CVA, ensuring BDO as liquidator
HMRC will ask BDO to unearth wrong doing at Rangers using BDO fraud experts with a range of backgrounds in criminal investigation, forensic accounting and forensic computing
Whyte is being taken to court by Ticketus
Duff & P taking BBC to court for the scurrilous lies about them on Mark Daly's programme.
Duff & P taking Collyer Bristow to court
Duff & P being investigated by the Insolvency Practitioner Association over a conflict of interest
SFA panel reconvening to find an acceptable penalty greater than a one year ban on signing big boys
SFA requests all clubs to return a declaration from each chairman that they have complied "without qualification" with the terms of Article 12.3 in the last 10 years. It also sets a deadline of no later than Friday 6 April 2012, to notify the SFA of "any written agreement(s) falling within the scope of Article 12.3 which has/have not previously been lodged with the Scottish FA in the previous 10 years in respect of any current or former players"
Dave King claiming £20million from Rangers as he bought shares on the basis of misrepresentation by David Murray the majority shareholder at the time.
Dave King will mount a legal challenge to block any attempted transfer of Craig Whyte's 85% shareholding in Rangers to Charles Green.
Whyte taking the BBC to court for saying not nice things about him
Whyte suing the SFA for defamation claiming he is not a trustworthy person.
Rangers being investigated by the SPL for alleged undisclosed payments
Craig Whyte and Gary Withey being investigated by Strathclyde Police.
Strathclyde Police probing the purchase of Rangers, the club's subsequent financial management and alleged criminality following a preliminary examination of information passed to police by administrators.
HMRC taking a lead role in challenging Duff & P's fees and activity during the administration
SFA under threat from FIFA that if they don't hit Rangers very hard, Scottish football will be formally ostracised
The Big Tax Case lurks in the background, waiting
HMRC review statement by Sevco director that they bought assets worth £50million for £5.5million. Fraud squad notified.

as if that aint enough

Our Rangers players moving on to better paydays elsewhere for FREE
Green claiming he has 'ownership' of the Rangers players and they cannot move freely to new clubs
SFA refusing to approve transfer of Rangers players
Unfinished business from the BBC and Mark Daly to come
Green will let us know who is (really) involved in his consortium
Green confirmed he is a moneylender not an investor
Green names his price at £50million to 'walk away'
SFA avoiding any decisions, trying to bounce decisions elsewhere.

And most SFL teams deciding on league 1 or 3... but with 3 abstaining (ones that get promotion) it doesn't look good for div 1

how much more can i take?

Believable17 Unbelievable3

Superb post - there's been that much going on I'd forgotten half of it :)

Agree9 Disagree0

Agree the list is endless and when will we get a conclusion to all of this mess.players are leaving on a daily basis,and the transfer embargo is still on-going.
Will it be Div 1 or Div 3 and after Friday the big picture might be a bit clearer,but Charles Green will need massive amounts of cash to re-build the squad,and Bill Miller withdrew his offer as he might be left only with Ibrox,MUrray Park,and the Albion but only left with a very small playing squad.
Worrying times now and for the future

Agree8 Disagree0

Yes, well constructed post that really captures the nightmare stuff so far and as you say, more to come...

If we look for a "silver lining" across the board here, perhaps we can hopr for :-

a cleaned-up, tighter run, generally better business model Rangers emerging

a fairer and improved SFA structure and more appropriate size league emerging

a lot of lessons learned across the board, not least for "Rangers"

perhaps more sign of quality youth players getting a chance again

and obviously as a by-product, everyone in the Scottish game has now acquired "sporting integrity" so the overall change will be transformational e.g. no more questioning referee decisions or faux appealing yellow & red cards; less diving / on the pitch antics; a more kindred spirit entering the game bot at boardroom level as well as on the pitch.

Or will sporting integrity be lost the minute Dundee and Dunfermline tear themselves apart fighting over a dog turd?

DD

Here's hoping

Agree12 Disagree0

I think youll find their wont be as many dodgy referee decisions or players diving in spl now that rangers have gone

Agree2 Disagree4

It'll probably get worse before it gets better...make that...ends.

Agree0 Disagree1

"I think youll find their wont be as many dodgy referee decisions or players diving in spl now that rangers have gone" get a grip pal, your mob are the best at it and i dont even have to say what team you support, however your post should not have been put up due to the fact it has nothing really to do with the opening post. In reply to the post itself i agree that with all this going on, every other team will be doing their best not to be involved in anything dodgy as they now know they will be dealt with. Also it does pave the way for more scottish lads getting a chance and i for 1 am happy with that, at the end of the day we will just have to wait for the overall outcome and take it in our stride and hope it does not kill our game.

Agree0 Disagree0

"I think youll find their wont be as many dodgy referee decisions or players diving in spl now that rangers have gone" ?? it was in reply to another reply if thats not allowed and shouldnt be put up then why are you replying to mine ?? and as for the kill our game let us SPL teams sort out the mess yous left yous go and sort out a new club to support after the mess you made of the last one i think the last people who should be giving advise on scottish football is a club who is being liquidated you made a mess out your own club dont interfere in our league

Agree2 Disagree1

12 Jul 2012 01:35:42
Let's look at the prospects of div one and div three.

Division 1 -

Higher crowds - more income
Better games - standard much better
Better players - more enjoyable to watch
Quicker promotion to SPL


Division 3 -

Much lower crowds - less income
Awful games
Poorer players
At best four years to SPL
No tv money at all

And the reasons why so called fans want to be in div 3 -

To "get back" at those SPL clubs who voted against us - all including Kilmarnock as an abstention is a no vote

To make them suffer as we are suffering

So that in the future there is no comeback of being accused of preferential treatment.

I have never heard such absolute rubbish. I am a Rangers fan, I want my team back to where they belong as soon as possible. I want more money coming in, I want us to back in SPL as soon as possible, in fact I want what's best for my club, and there is no way that div three is best for us. It is sheer stupidity , just think what you are all asking for.

If the SFL clubs vote us in div one, then that is their decision, there can be no comeback on us for their decision. And who cares if a few Celtic fans give us stick, we have had so much that a little more won't hurt.

I wonder how many of these fans calling for div three will actually put their hands in their pockets to watch that standard, I would think no more than 10-15,000. That prospect should fill you all with dread, because if that's what we get we will not survive.

We should be praying for div one, and stop this childish behaviour that we want them to suffer, it is schoolboy stuff.

The fans that want div three, really is like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Believable16 Unbelievable20

Think you'll find we won't be able to get a good enough squad together for the first division, and europe(where most of old firms income comes from recently) is a no go for three years anyway. Start in the third and build a team gradually through the leagues as I believe we would still have a bigger draw to attract the better players in each stage of our revival.
It is not about getting back at other teams it is about being realistic and starting from scratch......unless dundee's di Stephano buys old rangers and starts them in England in which case newco in any division is fuc!ed

Agree11 Disagree1

I mean what would you rather have-back in the SPL in a season or 3 seasons? Cut out this vengeful nonsense people

Agree4 Disagree2

As a newco rangers should be in div3 ...these are the rules for a newco and rangers fans and ally mcoist dont want special treatment and like the above poster mentioned we need time to build a decent squad from scratch

Agree7 Disagree1

The fans want SFL3 because then when Rangers get back to the top level (whatever it will be called, and they will) they can say they did it without any help from the other clubs. The SFL1 plan will always be an irritating thorn in the side for the club, with other clubs saying "If it wasn't for us you wouldn't be here" etc etc. Why should Rangers have to have that kind of debt?

PS Nobody suggested that, if reconstituted, Gretna should go into SFL1.

Agree5 Disagree1

The orignal poster gave a few reason why we want to go to Division 3 but forgot he main one: Because it's the right thing to do. I don't know if there are rules on which Div we go to (why would SFL cubs have to vote if there was a rule?). He also syas there can be no combeack becuase it's not us that decides where we go. That's b****cks - we will now and forever be branded with what has gone on. First dodgy decision that gioes our way ? Cue "Same Old Rangers, always cheating" from the terraces. And can you imagine who will get the blame if Scottish football down to down the pan? Our name will definitely be in there. So on my part Going to Div3 it's nothing to do with vengeance, it's where a new club should enter pure and simple.

Agree7 Disagree0

This has Glory Hunter written all over it. and if the same glory hunters dont want to watch us in the 3rd division then so be it! they will find their way back once we get back in the SPL. us hard core fans will follow everywhere. Div 3 for me is best option to save face reek revenge and build up a squad.

Agree4 Disagree1

Do any of you EVER think about other teams who may want to apply to the SFL for the vacant position in SFL3. No you don't, you seem to think you have a god given right to the vacant position whether it is 1 or 3, it's shamefull. Applications should be decided on merit and INTEGRITY, teams like Spartans have done no wrong unlike some.

Agree1 Disagree2

Reek revenge ?? How the hell are you going to do that , may I ask ? Are you going to unleash your hard done by supporters on towns like Annan, Falkirk. Ayr, Montrose, etc. You do know you do have a reputation for this sort of thing . Is this going to be what the newco will look like. IE full of hate and bile just like the old club ? I have even heard Sally coming out with this stuff IE we won't forget those who kicked us when we are down ! It really is pathetic. Is it any wonder nobody likes you . But oh I forgot, you don't care !

Agree4 Disagree2

Correct we don't care and are no longer any concern of yours, so jog on or should I say waddle back to your own page fatty! What is meant be reek revenge is that rangers will come back stronger than ever an destroy all competition. Typical that Scotland's Shane would automatically think that meant violence. I can see only one pathetic thing here...you! No body likes you, what are you 10 years old?! Go away little boy!

Agree1 Disagree4

Eh no we dont think we have the god given right, if you want to blame someone then blame the people running our game. Correct me if i am wrong but the SFA should make THEIR minds up and decide what they are doing with us, it is they who have said it will be sf1 or 3 not us so if you want to blame someone why dont you blame the relivant people. They should simply say you screwed up get in division 3, or you have screwed up you are out of scottish football, so why havnt they, al leave you to make up your own conclucion. Money is the answer.

Agree1 Disagree0

How will sevco come back stronger ?? has the 3rd got huge sky deal ? is the gate money in the 3rd huge ? will sponsors be queuing up at the door to sponsor at team that will not be on tv ? no euro cash no players no big investors only guys whos looking to take money out the club and youll be lucky to get 5000 season ticket holders at £150 a go yous are living on in dream land all spl clubs will earn more money than yous and their ait a bank in the world that will lend you it {Ed039's Note - Are you a corporate banker, do you know how much it costs to run a team in division 3? Do you know how many teams in Div 3 would love 5000 season ticket holders at £150 a pop? Its enought to romp that league, without paying the same overheads it would allow RFC to break even easily, and how do u know how many season tickets we would be able to sell in Div 3. Another classic case of someone opening their mouth and letting their belly rumble)

Agree0 Disagree0

So ed i take it by your reply that you tick all the boxes ?? your a corporate banker with vast experience in running 3rd division clubs ?? break even ? you aint got two bob to rub together so breaking even youll still be skint so like a say how is that coming back stronger ?and then youll need to step up a gear for the second then the 3rd then the spl youll be running at a loss every year your out the spl yous where liquidated in spl so what chance you got in the third face facts this is a new club thats never played before so you dont know how many fans youll actually have {Ed039's Note - I didnt claim anything, I was asking a question, can you not read?? We will wait and see and I believe you will eat your words)

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jul 2012 00:56:07
Craig Beattie flying out to South Africa today, he's been offered a very good deal by Bidvest Wits, an old team of Richard Gough's.
He has declared his desire to play with Gers in any division, and has also told this to Coisty and initially to Mark Hately who started the ball rolling.....however Ally hasn't even bothered to get back to him .... i think the big guy would have done us a proper turn, and if he does go to S.A , then best of luck to him....remember..some of the so called ''Rangers men'' jumped ship as soon as they could, so fair play to big Beattie for declaring himself.

Believable22 Unbelievable16

 
Change Consent