Rangers Rumours Archive February 19 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


19 Feb 2012 22:57:04
I heard that Craig wants McCoist out and is eyeing up a move for Billy Davis.

Believable18 Unbelievable39

Not this old chestnut.

Agree0 Disagree0

I heard McCoist wants to stay and wants Craig to go

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont make me laugh, craig whyte couldnt care who is manager cos he aint giving him any money and he aint paying no bills. whyte just wants to be able to feel safe sitting on his seat. billy davis? he prob thinks he is the captain of rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shut up wi these ridiculous rumours about white wanting mccoist out sick of hearing these lies

Agree0 Disagree0

I heard that everyone wants Craig Whyte out!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Just another timothy tryin tae spout utter sh:+e, craig whyte is not in control of rangers the administrators are allys going nowhere

MF WATP!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Surely you understand this by now, the administrators are running the club. Whyte's power has been legally removed until the administration is ended

Agree0 Disagree0

Craig Whyte has NO say at present!

Agree0 Disagree0

Heard this rumour about 4 month ago
Zzzzzzzzzzzz.......govan_front87

Agree0 Disagree0

Ally is a nice guy, leave him alone to try and sort out the mess you guys are in. Changing your manager at this time will achieve nothing.
If the guy has no money to buy decent players what can you expect, your youth policy has been a joke for years, so there is not much in the back ground waiting to blossom.

Agree0 Disagree0

To re-iterate what other posters have already said. With the company now in administration Craig Whyte has no executive powers and no say in the running of the company. If Ally is to go it will simply be to save money, no other reason.

Agree0 Disagree0

Our youth policy may be poor but still produced hutton adam (premiership players) mcgregor what exactly have septic produced mcgeady an thats it lol you have no clue pal

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 20:41:48
Tom Hunter who has tried to buy Rangers twice before is going to make a 3rd move for the club and is in discussion with HMRC as we speak, seeming David Murray fell out with Tom Hunter over another business deal (that wont surprise anyone) but now hes out the way he is determined to buy the club that he has loved all his life, iam a Rangers fan also and i hope this happens , my God do we need it !

Believable27 Unbelievable53

Mr Hunter may well be a fan of The Rangers FC, as you may be as well - but I guarantee that "as we speak" he is not sitting down to discuss this...........

Agree0 Disagree0

I think that would be every rangers fans dream out come,

whyte out of the club and a new owner in with some decent wealth and a decent business brain,

Agree0 Disagree0

Dont see anyone doin anything till big tax case resolved hmrc bang out of order in my opinion i wd be stalling payments to them too after their behaviour

Agree0 Disagree0

Where has this information been sourced from??

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes, tom was interested in rangers a long time ago but he no longer is interested in doing so. i firmly believe that someone unknown to us fans will show an interest and i expect the speculation to spread like wild fire as of next week.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why would HMRC discuss a taxcase with anyone other than the business whos tax it is ya clown!

Agree0 Disagree0

Total bull mr hunter would not touch us wae a barge poll.

Agree0 Disagree0

Tom hunter us a business man, who makes money, and he will not with a football club. He gives all his spare funds to charity

Agree0 Disagree0

Tom Hunter may be a charitible philanthropist but can't quite see him happy to pay off David Murray's debts!

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd say Jim McColl more likely than Tom Hunter

Agree0 Disagree0

You say hunter gives his money to charity we need charity money mate

Agree0 Disagree0

Aye hmrc are bang out of order imagine demanding money that is due to them! You need to realise that they could have had the club liquidated by now if they had wanted

Agree0 Disagree0

Does Jim McColl earn a lot as a gardener? Getting on a bit now, I would say.

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC do not want to liquidate rangers at present. They want the precedent of a victory in the FTT so they can go after EPL clubs. Once the tribunal announces the decision they will have a different view, until then they have to keep rangers alive

Agree0 Disagree0

Would be better if the fans bought the club end of

Agree0 Disagree0

Rubbish post

Agree0 Disagree0

I wud say this is not a rubbish post its just as valid as some of the other nonsensical comments nonbrains put on here, Tom Hunter did want to buy the club twice before and was rejected that is true, but at this moment in time he would not touch the club especially with all the uncertainty hanging over us with the tax bill etc, any buyer would need to talk with the HMRC aswell discussing any possible repayment, no-one is going to come in and just say oh heres your 70 million and everything will be kushty, anyone thinking along those lines is deluded and living in a fantasy world, also tom hunter took a massive hit on his financies a couple of years ago he cant do that again, we need ALOT of money with potential buyers getting little return on whatever they invest, thats why the most likely buyer will be a consortium of some sort, which i believe will be better for our club at this moment in time anyway

Agree0 Disagree0

What decent buisnessman would want to buy a club that would drag his name through the dirt with the sort of songs that i heard sung at Ibrox on saturday?

Agree0 Disagree0

I'd say Jim McColl more likely than Tom Hunter

I'd say Lord Lucan more likely than Tom Hunter

David

Agree0 Disagree0

What songs did you hear? u sure u were at ibrox on sat and not at easter road? We were more than entitled to sing whatever we wanted, its not the fans fault, were the ones than have been taken for a run by Murray and Mr Whyte, dont get me wrong i loved it when we were signing top class players but if i knew we'd be in a mess in 10 years coz of it i wud have been very much the opposite, if we were in the EPL we would be owned by the shiek mansour or someone but thats what buyers need to consider little or no comeback on what they invest thats whats makes it unattractive, a potential buyer has to support rangers in some shape or form.

Agree0 Disagree0

Am gettin sick of you lot! we were singin songs, not paramilitary songs like yous, billy boys is offensive my arse! yous can't take it! look it the hearts game, tic fans in full voice and CLEARLY chantin. THE I THE I THE IRA, and guess what? oh nothin was done swept under the celtic rug, celtic has got the media and everybody else wrapoed round there finger! we have stopped singin offensive songs when the ban came in but your apparent political songs ain't, full of hatred towards scotland, our heroes and most of all. Britain! yous should be disgusted, celtic ain't repected as yous say yous are but loudly supporting a shizzy terrorist group makes it worse, here's a lesson, the ira hasn't ever fought outside ireland and the reason yous are apparently undefeated was because yous haven't fought to be defeated! sorry ed, a know this might not be posted but theres been a lot I've had to bit my lip with, yeah there entitled to have a rant but its got the point where even barcelona 1972 won't be allowed to be sung, GERS LAD

Agree0 Disagree0

I certainly hope Tom Hunter buys the club. I have been wishing that for years!

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 19:24:46
Sasa Papac and Lee McCulloch have said they will play for free so that other players and staff won't lose there jobs.
I take my hat off to you's guys.

The administrator said that they know where the £24m ticketus money is and it never went to pay loyds banking group.

I can't give a source or my name. You will find out more about it soon.

We Are The People.

Believable48 Unbelievable45

Tremendous show of class from these two, if true. I'm sure others will follow if so. Muzz

Agree0 Disagree0

Great gesture if true but was thinking if all players (except those earning less than Ł5k per week) where to take a pay cut to the Ł5 k per week for 2 months Or if club comes out of administration if sooner,would save the club about Ł1million in players wages alone.that would show how tight a club we are and give the fans a great message that the players are fully behind this.

Agree0 Disagree0

RESPECT from a Celtic season ticket holder

Agree0 Disagree0

Sasa papac is probably suspended mind you

Agree0 Disagree0

Credit to those players if thats true,

sure other players and management will follow suit, even if it is taking a pay cut, as long as they know it going to keep the guys on a standard wage employed..

good to see the rich players looking out for the normal staff..

Agree0 Disagree0

Jig cant play thats the problem !

Mate ive supported the club for 33 years and Lee is 100% the worst player ive ever seen in our colours, hes better walking just like Davir Weir did and give our youth a chance , bring back wee Hutton and off load Lee Maculloch now theres a step forward for us !

Agree0 Disagree0

Someone else posting crap face it people will get paid of and it will start next week

Agree0 Disagree0

Well good luck to them if they love the club that much. Hope youre right mate.

neil j

Agree0 Disagree0

Heard from Lee Wallace that pretty much the whole first team squad are prepared to take a wage cut for a period with money to be owed back later in order to make sure no staff lose jobs at Rangers.

Agree0 Disagree0

Even if true! RFC still need to pay the tax and insurance subs on their wages and I guess that to be 20k pm. 18m not in question as to CW actually paying Lloyds, this is the reason CW is now a secure creditor, it's the 24m not going to RFC for the sale of tickets (to his lawyer acct)

Agree0 Disagree0

I rate lee for his charachter alone his effect on other players is invaluable this comes from a member of management team

Agree0 Disagree0

Last post can't be a real fan . Big jig puts in 100 % and hats off if he and papac playing for free. Wish a couple of the big earners would follow follow !

Agree0 Disagree0

I think that in this day and age where footballers get bad rap for money etc....they should be applauded.......WE ARE THE PEOPLE!!

Agree0 Disagree0

McCulloch the worst, what's Broadfoot then Apele or something, he is the worst without a doubt never known a player to give away so man goals or games in my time watching the Gers for 30 years.

Agree0 Disagree0

The player who most deserves a pay cut is Davis, He sould be the first to hold his hands up and say, im not playing well enough to merit the wage i get

Agree0 Disagree0

They should all play for nothing they are loaded

Agree0 Disagree0

That wouldn't happen. Even if Sasa and Lee both wanted to, the admin would just say "we've got two players who'll play for nothing, so lets get rid of two players who want paid"

I agree with Davis taking a pay cut, don't know what's been going on with him this season, 3 goals in the whole campaign says it all.

Agree0 Disagree0

What wishful thinking this rumour is, total nonsense. They will all be redundant shortly anyway. Kids only will be playing, the club is running a Ł1m deficit per month ffs and that is in ADDITION to all the debt.....what part of that do people NOT get !!

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 17:37:49
All main line bookmakers have today stopped taking bets on rangers LOSING tax case, you can now get a best price of 12/1 on hmrc winning. Before green whatever rubbishes try phoning your bookie and placing a bet, seems like someone is in the know

Believable32 Unbelievable42

I dont believe bookies ever had a book on this to start with

Agree0 Disagree0

Wrong poster wullie hill giving online 10 mins ago 1/3 on rangers winning and 16/1 on losing but I agree someone knows

Agree0 Disagree0

William hill still giving bet

Agree0 Disagree0

Paddy power suspended betting on the gers not losing case today

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm a bet placer with coral true post

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope we win it damn jelly and icecream well do it bear style champagne and caviar bbblue

Agree0 Disagree0

You can have a bet on anything at the bookies.

Agree0 Disagree0

Surely rangers losing the tax case or hmrc winning it,

is just the same thing in a different way?

Agree0 Disagree0

You can get a bet on anything at bookies now all you do is phone up and they will get back a price to you, christ you can even get a bet on a allien landing on earth btw 500/1 in next year lol true

Agree0 Disagree0

Not if the bookies stop taking bets ya tube!

Agree0 Disagree0

Has anyone got any proof of this cause you cant make any sort of bet on this at william hill online

Agree0 Disagree0

Just checked willie hill no sign of that bet

Agree0 Disagree0

Even get a bet on septic getting two in a row however unlikely that may be watp

Agree0 Disagree0

Bets suspended but you can still get 12/1
how does that work ?
post a link as i have been on them all and not one of them will offer a price or have any messages saying betting suspended
reason why
its ilegal to bet on a non public domain event/subject

Agree0 Disagree0

Lies!!

Agree0 Disagree0

Are the odds saying Rangers will win or lose the tax case?

Agree0 Disagree0

I was a bit skeptical about that but to my great suprise found it to be true certainly for willhill and ladbrokes only 2 i tried to get a bet on the rangers losing the tax case only to be told that market was no longer available. was gobsmacked a bookie refusing a bet!! dont have any details other than whats in the news and i dont particularly beleive half of that either, think i will wait til this administrator files his report which is freely available for joe public to look over should have a clearer picture.. for the good of scottish football lets hope there is light at the end of a very dark financial tunnel.
i am no fan of mr whyte but looking at his record against the tax throughout his chequered career it makes me think the right man is in charge of the fight against the taxman after all who better to fight satan(taxman) than another devil(whyte). just a thought. we could punt him after it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well whoever loses is going to appeal, that is 100% certain. which will make it drag on and on

Agree0 Disagree0

Lot a pish

Agree0 Disagree0

Bookies very rarely wrong

Agree0 Disagree0

Worth remembering that the odds are driven by money put on. Timmy will be going mad trying to make money. The bookies know nothing they just reflect the volume of cash being wagered.

Agree0 Disagree0

If Rangers lose the tax case then HMRC have won. This post is totally ilogical. I cant get a bet on Rangers losing but I can get a bet on HMRC winning ??

Agree0 Disagree0

This post isn't illogical, you obviously know nothing about betting odds. Odds of 12/1 for HMRC winning means that they are rank outsiders...it'd be like Getafe being 12/1 to beat Barca.

Agree0 Disagree0

Is rangers winning not the same as hmrc winning?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry mean is rangers winning not the same as hmrc not winning

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 14:45:38
have spoken with an SPL Official at
the Golf Club this morning.
Moves are afoot to pay from our tv
monies due the debt to other
member clubs more than a million.
With 9 million a year of ticket monies gone now talk of 7 million of big tax debt now
been talked off as payment over 10 years
years and a current overspend of
10 million annually.
Possibility of no european earnings
for 3 years
We need to make savings of around
25- 30 million on the current budget.
10 years of pain methinks

Believable37 Unbelievable44

"at the golf club". ha classic mate, needed a joke to cheer me up. PaulRFC

Agree0 Disagree0

That would be great,we could do a new record of ten in a row.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just liquidate us and start again.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rubbish, funds due to the club must by law go to the Administrator. Another load of rubbish

Agree0 Disagree0

What aload of bull we aint lost tax case so how can u say that

Agree0 Disagree0

No point in trying to tell people we are going be piss poor for years because they are completely brainwashed on here.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why do people post absolute nonsense like this and expect us to believe it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just liquidate us. wot a stupid coment do u even like football never heard such rubbish! Do u really want to be known as the team who single handedly killed Scottish football? Ya eejit

Agree0 Disagree0

Getting rid of some of these rubbish players that have been bleeding us dry with over inflated wages will be a good start.
If cost cutting means that we have to give youngsters a game every week. I think that will only be a positive thing.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bit cold for playing golf

Agree0 Disagree0

Sad sad state of affairs. i dont think whyte has come to the table to bargain for a prolonged tax repayment or prolonged income loss over years and years, he would rather see us liquidated and start again cos he knows the sfa wouldnt relegate in a million years gers in the spl means no tv money from sky alex symes from sky has spelled that one out loud and clear. and the other 11 members would vote for us to be there too as it would financial suicide for them not to. a genuine question if the unthinkable did happen and wer liquidated would rangers be free to start again some where else like england even from the bottom tier. cos even if we made it into the championship 2 seasons ther would be like 4-5 in the spl financially i mean? just a thought dont know if that would be viable, there certainly wouldnt be any opposition in scotland cos we wouldnt need permission from sfa,spl or uefa as it would be a new entity. not that i am in favour of this like i said just a question. thanks for listening it been like therapy this.lol

Agree0 Disagree0

No liquidation pay back what we owe over a few years then get back on our feet the wage bill has been too high for years whos worth 28 grand a week total joke times are hard for us average rangers fans

Agree0 Disagree0

This is nonsense,Iwas also at the golf club this morning, (shot a '67). Many will try to pre-empt me, but I know too much.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 10:44:11
Interesting article by Andrew Smith
in the Scotland on Sunday containing
comments from a "Key Witness" in
the tax tribunal.

Believable11 Unbelievable15

Aye, who says he haw.

Agree0 Disagree0

Take out the daily rebel and the BBC all other media oulets especially heavy weights leaning towards a different viewpoint on tax case wander why? Oh just a wee thought to consider, hmrc now going to attack another tax loophole and reclaim tax, that is image rights which has been only paying 2% tax on. Didn't henrick not get that clause in to his last contract ummmm

Agree0 Disagree0

The source, who is not connected to Rangers but had clients who benefited from EBTs, claims that this entirely misrepresents the scheme in operation at Ibrox. “It was totally and absolutely correctly administered, and the club met all their legal responsibilities and complied with all tax laws,” said the source. “They took advice from top-notch lawyers and a whole battalion of the best accountants on a global level

Agree0 Disagree0

He also states players returned home , relates to , canigga , craig moore , vidmir , amato , amo , ? surely if you paid taxes in another country and once you returned to your home you can claim taxes back if got a few ex work mates who have done this ?

Agree0 Disagree0

Don't think Henrik did but Nakamura definitley did

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 10:35:11
its just been rerported on mainstream news channel that if rangers are found guilty of any tax issues HMRC will indeed work with rangers and allow them to pay debt off over many years ....good news bears

Believable37 Unbelievable27

No, the reports relate to the 9 million bill, not the big ax case

Agree0 Disagree0

There is no guilt in the big tax situation, this tax has not wilfully been witheld but is a debate around the application of the scheme.

Agree0 Disagree0

Problem is though with no money to pay bills, if Tax is not paid any agreement will be stopped and like Hearts, will face a winding up notice every month. Only difference is, Rangers won't be able come up with the cash each month

Agree0 Disagree0

Well obviously this is the best outcome all round, if HMRC want to be paid they need to let us earn the money somehow

Agree0 Disagree0

Whyte wud rather wind it up and start again wud be cheaper for him in the short run as i dont see him hanging around longer than it takes him to resell for a gud profit having the tax lingering on means they are not attractive enough

Agree0 Disagree0

Hmrc will need to make a deal simple or wind up club. its a shrewed move bringing in adminisrmtrators bcos any payments will hv to be agreed with administrators who hav an obligation to make payments a

Agree0 Disagree0

The club has to work out a plan of payment to hmrc once we come out of admin in april rangers could well win the tax case who knows if worst comes to worst broker a deal to keep the club alive why would we want to lose our 140 years of history any money due can be paid up to stop insolvancy might be a few lean years but we come out the other side with a bit of credit and honesty

Agree0 Disagree0

Excellent.I am 47 years old,so basically rangers won't win the league in my lifetime.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 10:06:57
interesting reading ....comments from a source close to the tax case

http://www.scotsman.com/scotland-on-sunday/sport/rangers_administration_key_witness_says_rangers_can_still_win_50m_tax_case_1_2125385

Believable19 Unbelievable20

One of the best pieces of reporting yet. EBT's were legal, as it says, until Dec 2010 this is all down to administration of the scheme and the burden of proof will lie with HMRC. Basically they would need to produce a letter to a player saying the "loan" was instead of pay to make this stick. Makes you wonder if the administration of this week on PAYE / NI is sour grapes!

Agree0 Disagree0

If HMRC win this then expect a domino effect on a number of english clubs that operated similar schemes (also a couple of scottish ones will be nervously checking previous contracts with foreign players) Does HMRC want to be the cause of major devastation of the "national" game? or will we see common sense prevail?

Agree0 Disagree0

HMRC are just trying to get money that is owed to them from which ever football club that be. Pay the taxes that you me and every other decent person pays, the economy is in trouble do you watch any other news other than the problems at RFC

Agree0 Disagree0

So lets assume we WIN the big tax case on legal technicalities

my question would be was there really any need to go into administration if that happens

Agree0 Disagree0

Ive read the link n after seeing the amounts season by season ive thought the hmrc was a disgrace , i think they will win for one reason only they werent made illegal till 2010 so how can u get penalised for anythin that went before , if rangers win i hope the start legal proccedings against hmrc for the damage they have caused rfc , this has held our club back for the last 3 years shocking behaviour from the biggest crooks around hmrc

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm becoming more optimistic that Rangers are going to see a favourable outcome to the big tax case. How ironic it'll be that Whyte has put us in admin over just Ł9m ! He should never have been allowed to takeover the club. Looks like LBG didn't care where the Ł18m came from or how legitimate the money was.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2012 07:37:47
don't know if you'll print this but after reading the sunday express there is real evidence that this tax case is a test case for the big banks and multi-national big business in london all using these EBT schemes here's the article that follows >>Rangers are no closer to a final decision on the so-called ‘big tax case’ – HMRC’s bid to reclaim up to £75million from the club for their use of Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs) under Sir David Murray’s previous regime.

And it was revealed yesterday hundreds of UK businesses are anxiously awaiting the outcome, fearing the taxman could be knocking on their door next. It is believed several major banks, as well as City of London investment funds, manufacturing companies and English Premier League football clubs are also facing repercussions over their use of EBTs, designed to reward high earners.

If HMRC chooses to act, it is believed that the potential tax claims could reach a staggering £2billion.

Neal Todd, a lawyer at Berwin Leighton Paisner and an expert in tax planning, revealed his company alone has knowledge of some 300 inquiries launched across Britain.

He said: “There is a deep anxiety that EBTs are now being challenged [by the Revenue] in a retrospective way. The amounts at stake are potentially sizeable as this was a widely used way to remunerate staff in a tax-efficient manner for many years.

“We have seen an onslaught of challenges; undoubtedly there will be litigation on them. If Rangers lose, there will be considerable worry in the City.”

One Rangers adviser confirmed that the taxman was keen to set a precedent for their bigger targets in England.

He said: “The HMRC consistently refused to settle our Employee Benefits Trust case because they saw it as an important test case for other businesses and individuals.”

Believable36 Unbelievable2

You have to wonder about the ramifications of HMRC pursuing two billion quid in retrospective taxes given the state of the economy.

However I'm unsure of one thing that someone can maybe answer - why are HMRC using Rangers as a test case?

What are the reasons behind selecting Rangers if there are potentially hundreds of businesses, including other football clubs, owing more than Rangers do?

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't doubt that is true, But I also believe that the case has been lost by HMRC, due to insufficient proof against Rangers, And that is why Judgement has been delayed, as another 3 test cases are awaiting Judgement that have been proved, the investigators who put this case together against Rangers are Top investigators ,But the team sent to Edinburgh last week are of the Highest office,The are Known within the Revenue as the Hit Squad, and have been instructed find some justification for the Rangers case being brought, This team have been responsible bringing major fraud cases to court and over the past 3 years have won cases that have seen sentences of over 1,000 year imprisonment being dished out to offenders, What was a test case has become a vendetta against Rangers Football Club.

Agree0 Disagree0

Usual test case used in scotland again

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers are an easier target as the EBTs have not been operated as advised.

Agree0 Disagree0

If rangers are found guilty. most of the big clubs in the uk will be under investigation soon. graeme

Agree0 Disagree0

I've also heard that Rangers have won the "big tax" case, but won't receive the judgement until April. Problem is that Rangers will lose their Uefa registration if they don't come out of administration by 31st March - HMRC are going to try to use this to their advantage.

Agree0 Disagree0

What i heard was a certian telecommunications company are one of the EBT taxe cases and they are due 100's of millions but HMRC couldn't go up against a company of that size first as they wouldn't win. They seen Rangers as an easy target to get the ball rolling and them to be in a position where they know they will win. Its just bad timing with Whyte not paying the PAYE so. I don't think HMRC will back down on Rangers. They will follow this till they win. If they lose this case then they will lose all the others.
Don

Agree0 Disagree0

But of course if they don't win the Rangers case that changes the game entirely.

Agree0 Disagree0

In what way is Rangers losing their UEFA registration an advantage to HMRC? surely denying us a source of income is the last thing they need

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers need to agree a settlement with HMRC to get out of admin before 31March, otherwise Rangers won't be able to play in Europe. Puts HMRC at an advantage for getting the most they can out of a CVA settlement.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent