Rangers Rumours Archive May 03 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


03 May 2013 18:34:15
Transfer news: Rangers (and Aberdeen) are tracking Prince Bauben and Morgaro Gomis (tv)

Believable34 Unbelievable23

03 May 2013 21:16:18
we should go in for wiess true rangers at heart and only 23/24 out of contract wages would be the only problem I think but cracking player and young danny wilson

Agree1 Disagree1

More of the 'sign any player who played for Rangers' brigade. Get a grip and look beyond the past.

Agree0 Disagree1

04 May 2013 01:29:19
i wouldn't just sign him because he played for us I would because the boy a cracking young player the plays for the club with heart witch rangers are sertanly in need of this season coming

Agree0 Disagree0

Are you trying to suggest that you would knock back a young talented player like weiss in our position? Although I know it won't happen I think if it was on the cards youd be mental to decline that oppertunity, seems to me like your jumping on the look to the future no matter how young or talented bandwagon, a mix of past players and new players wouldn't be the worst thing in the world in my eyes. James

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is superstar Wiess out of contract and in what way is he better than templeman, Aird, Mckay, or little

Agree0 Disagree0

There's a polish lad at Barnsley, who are about to be relegated. Tomasz Cywka. Good age at 24, attacking midfielder. Former Derby player.


Derby County/Rangers fan

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2013 10:44:47
ally comfirms interest in nicky clark. take a wage cut first ally before going on about players

Believable51 Unbelievable21

Personally I would go for lyle taylor and big higgy of motherwell!

Agree0 Disagree1

The same lyle taylor who will still be under contract. nicky clark has already signed so I have heard

Agree0 Disagree0

Lyle Taylor's contract finishes at the end of the month

Agree0 Disagree0

'so I have heard' if I had a pound for every time I I heard that!

Agree0 Disagree0

If I had a pound for every time someone said ' if I had a pound etc. '

Just a pity no- one is handing out pounds.

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2013 18:23:39
Why not go for Johnny Russell & Gary MacKay Stevens from Dundee Utd. Best two young players in Scotland & would be great with Templeton.

Agree0 Disagree0

Why not realise that those United players are under contract so Rangers cannot buy them! Additionally, where would the money come from?

Agree1 Disagree1

03 May 2013 20:53:09
there both under contract and both celtic fans well ahead of what rangers could bring in atm

Agree0 Disagree2

I think nicky Clark would be a great addition he is young quick and knows where the goal is. 40 goals in any division is a good return in my eyes. I think we need guys that know the lower divisions as I'm sure you all know most of our big spl signings last summer have struggled bar wee temps.

Agree1 Disagree0

Regards both being celtic supporters so was maurice johnston it never stopped signing

Agree1 Disagree0

Nicky clark is a rangers player already it is just a matter of it being announced officially I can only imagine they are waiting till the season is over before they make the announcement and also watch for one shock signing from the spl don't have any names but I am being told by someone very close to robbie crawford a major signing is close to being finalised.

Agree0 Disagree0

I happen to know for a certain fact that Gary Mackay stevens is no celttic fan, he supports Hibs. He is too good for Scottish football and will be heading to England.

Agree1 Disagree0

04 May 2013 08:13:08
Why should we not sign both United players? We have the £10 million ring fenced from the share issue to spend! That's more than enough!

Agree0 Disagree1

No we do not have £10m green was talking rubbish, yea they would cost like £4m around £2m each

Agree0 Disagree0

"wage cut, you mean haircut, he's an effin hairdresser, what next taylor ferguson at sweeper,. ,. kbarry

Agree0 Disagree0

03 May 2013 09:44:30
Inside info from a partner in a big Glasgow legal firm - there is going to be "revelations " about ownerships of Rangers property. They can`t say more at the moment as they are under " close scrutiny "

Believable66 Unbelievable52

Don't tell my pal or brother in law is a senior partner wait till we hear from the QC involved in the enquiry before we start rumours

Agree2 Disagree0

Are you being ironic here? Have a look at the name of the web site. There is a clue as to what it`s all about!

Agree0 Disagree0

I wonder what these revelations will reveal, so exciting. not really. What more can come out that has not previously been rumoured.

Agree1 Disagree1

CW owns the club not the holding company. CG lied. Get the seat belts back on guys.

Agree1 Disagree0

This sounds as if it could be a FACT.

Agree1 Disagree0

I heard that dermott desmond owns ibrox and murray park, think he will flatten them for building real estate, comes from a very good source

Agree0 Disagree1

I'm hearing £5.5m never changed hands.
SDM has his name on deeds and never gave them away for a quid. All he gave away was the debt and Pinset and Mason uncovered stuff about D&Ps role.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 May 2013 04:29:29
Look what good does any of your bulls**t rumours do? What do any of you know for certain? Answer - nout! Now pack it in, its a joke! James

Agree0 Disagree0

I think the revelations which will emerge around SDM will have more to do with his foreknowledge of Craig Whyte's intentions.
SDM wanted rid and so holding on to the assets would not have fitted in with that strategy.
He would have known that the only people interested in buying Rangers would have been people of Whyte's ilk.
I think he, allegedly, may even have recruited him for the purpose and provided him with ideas/contacts as to how he could proceed (e. g. Ticketus)

Agree0 Disagree0

The bottom line is did CW pay 5.5 million for the assets, if he did not then he cannot own them. If CW was promised a share of the company that bought the assets then he is entitled to a share of the company's value.

All this nonsense about title deeds is totally irrelevant, CW is looking for a lot more than just a share of the assets, he wants a share of the TRFC.

As for SDM, its not illegal to dump a toxic company and show the buyer how to buy it without using any of his own money, its called a mortgage. CW tried to use the property as security for his loan which is nonsense, its not his property until he pays the loan, and he didn't repay the loan.

Agree0 Disagree0

You know, when all is said and done, David Murray told us he would not sell the club to someone who does not have the future of the club at heart! And what does he do? He does the exact opposite! Why is nobody bringing him to account for this? He lied to the rangers support, pure and simple. Will all these " investigations " confirm this? To me, DM started the whole ball rolling by offloading the club to a venture capitalist spiv who in turn, passed is on to another venture capitalist spiv! And people wonder why we are in this mess!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent