Rangers Rumours Archive January 09 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


09 Jan 2013 16:34:11
rangers owner charles green will urge his board to find a way for rangers to leave scottish football should current reconstruction plan's go ahead ( source a web site )

Believable91 Unbelievable98

Heard him say it on TV interview.
Well that's it then no commitment to SFL or SPL or the new setup from Rangers. Official position of the club.
I really wish we wouldn't knee jerk react to every footballing issue and give a negative perspective.

Agree4 Disagree2

Where does he take the club or is this his bail out plan??

Agree3 Disagree0

Go where?.
More posturing from Green.Stirring up trouble for no reason.We're stuck where we are and don't have any right to preferential treatment.We're a member like every other club and rules apply to everyone.When we start acting like an equal member and accept decisions rather than trying to throw our weight around because WATP, then maybe we'll get somewhere.
Green says he'll try and get us out of Scottish Football.Right now Scottish Football would be glad to see us go!

Agree4 Disagree2

Charles Green asks in which league you win the division and then play the same teams. I would've thought that Charles knew the answer to that question (despite it being dismissive of all the other teams in the current fouth tier of Scottish Football) is the current SPL.
That of course is the league that Charles will not allow his team to play in remember.
Put brain in gear first Charles before opening mouth.

Agree4 Disagree8

What will aim market say when they here this, remember ratner say his customers were buying cheap crap...... 1year later he lost his entire business.

green now acting like whyte... a ponce. he has millions at stake why say no future in scottish footbal for gers recovery, if no plan to go elsewhere???

Agree3 Disagree5

Board of an associate member of sfa organises boycott of cup match, now undermines spl, sfa and sfl plans to restructure when they are associate member and don't have any vote or say.....

expect yet another charge of bringing game into disrepute, something up here bears, like green doesnot want rangers fc in scottish football at all.... is that what you invested for... to leave scottish footbal, so all away games in another country.....wow

ryanair and easyjet every week, on gorbals wages.....

Agree3 Disagree5

What about Iceland?
Liah Smit

Agree1 Disagree1

12-12-17 has a ring to it.

Agree3 Disagree2

Bears this guy is backing you into a corner on purpose it would seem, he just doesn't make sense

Agree2 Disagree1

We would still be in the third tier division if it went ahead or not

Agree1 Disagree0

How can a charge of bringing the game into disrepute be on order !, i have not seen one person who shares the view of this new set up so why should he or the club be volleyed by more negative accusations and fines when he has only said what the majority of the country has said also and that includes a lot celtic supporters too, this new set up is nothing short of embarrassing and just shows how the rich plan to get richer and the poorer be less competitive, why should a team on the up be held back from promotion due to some micky mouse rules of a bottom four top four 2nd split shambles

Agree1 Disagree0

Why would anybody want to play in a league set up where the only incentive is to make sure you are relegated next year to lower costs and get the big bucks against the only draw in town 4 clubs have threatened to walk out SPL just a coincidence that it will be 4up 4 down League set up in more ways than one Even with celtic giving prize money away the SPL will be the place nobody wants to be or atleast 2 seasons

Agree1 Disagree1

CG is making Rangers looking like fools, with his stupid comments. I just wish this man would take the cash he is here for and go and let us start to rebuild the great glasgow rangers

Agree2 Disagree4

The only option I can see Green doing, would be to buy an English club and then transfer it to Rangers, so that it would be a quicker way for Rangers into getting in the English League 2.From what I'm seeing - I still think this is what he really is trying to do.

For me personally, I think if I was going to see Rangers every week, I'd rather see Rangers play teams twice a season than the monotonous 4 to 6 times.So if moving down south is a doable option then why not? Because for as long as we remain in the Scottish set-up, we'll never become a Chelsea or a Man U.

Agree0 Disagree0

Arab here, without any joking, i really feel sorry for the real supporters, talk about lions led by donkeys, Chuckles Green is making rfc and by the way ALL scottish football a joke. he opens his mouth way before he engages his brain, hand on heart i feel sorry for the honest footie fans amongst you

Agree3 Disagree2

Hes right if it happens this season is a waste of time, and he said what team wins promotion and plays the same teams next year, thats what he meant, he wants to see gers progressing through the leagues not being held back through league reconstruction

Agree2 Disagree0

Your not being held back still 3yrs to top leg, but a question how will rangers fans feel about staying in 1st division for a couple of yrs as if cg still in charge he already stated he wouldn t take rangers into spl just a thought

Agree0 Disagree1

You can win DIV1 and NOT GET promoted - cos your stadium does not meet SPL standards - its happened several times, and GERS never complained before.

Get real this can alway happen.

This plan allows rangers to get to spl 1 year earlier (green says this), and so its to thier benefit, games against spl teams earlier, more money, etc etc all to the good.

So why say anything, when associate member with no vote. Green got loads of publicity - even media outlet (bbc, sky, stv, the telegraph, daily mail) all covering Rangers but for wrong reasons, and this could undermine stock price, why would you WANT to do that ?

unless collapsing the share price is part of the plan, Whyte wanted to go into admin, what does green really want ?

Money - but from where ?

Agree0 Disagree1

For once I find myself agreeing with an Arab ! My concern about engaging his brain is that it doesn't appear to work a lot of the time ! Where is our new media supremo in this debacle ? Surely he is paid to stop this type of nonsense hitting the press ?

Agree0 Disagree1

Strange one this. When Rangers were winning titles and playing in European finals they couldnt get out of Scotland, now as a new club they are just going to up sticks and go somewhere else, how...well that doesnt matter does it, Charlie says so thats all you need to know. 6 months ago it was all bowing and thanks for letting us in, now its we're off because you won't let us vote...let me know if you need a hand packing up, even willing to take a day or 2 off for the pleasure of seeing you go.

Agree2 Disagree0

I honestly don't think green is that clever, he came up here thinking he was a big shot, hard nosed business man, and we were a bunch of country bumpkins, and he could bully is way about.
He was expecting the restructure to benefit rangers to top flight, and now sees his business plan (if any) collapsing in front of his eyes, the guy is another in a line of conmen running rangers. Jj

Agree1 Disagree2

Ed what are your thought's on this statement by charles green. this man should take a look at himself the way it is going we are going to have no football team to support soon. think this is his excuse to bail out of rangers. {The Ed039's Note - This is my initial thought, sell up and get rich quick. To be honest, the reconstruction is a bit farcical, but it wouldnt change the timescale in which it took Rangers to get to the top table, but I wonder if they have considered the TV deal in all of this, have they consulted Sky and ESPN because that is going to be a big factor)

Agree0 Disagree1

Progression isnt about time to get to top league, hes angry at winning a league and playing same teams again next year, and if any div 3 team gets a vote on reconstruction then obviously they are going to vote for it, theyl get more games against rangers....more doh for them!

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jan 2013 15:33:25
Will Green still put the season books up next year even if were still in the bottom tier & does he still get his bonus if we win the league but don't get promotion to a higher division? {The Ed039's Note - He will because we will actually be a division closer to the top league, his bonus clause is well worded)

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Jan 2013 15:35:35
The same old boring playing each team 4 times, the same old comical split! What a wasted opportunity to improve Scottish football. Increase the top tier to 16 and two leagues of 14. simples!

Agree1 Disagree0

My god guys, it is no wonder the rest of Scottish Football hates us. You would have thought we would have learned from the White fiasco, now it's the Green show, fit and proper person springs to mind...not! Even now we are being stuffed by Green & White..and no..not the Celtic. How can we possibly move forward when Green spits the dummy out if the way is not to his liking. Really time to knuckle down, take our medicine on the chin, support our young bears and progress according to the RULES. Thanks. {The Ed039's Note - You quote "according to the rules". Nothing has been done by the rules, everything has just been made up as we go along, there was NO RULE to say Rangers couldnt play in the SPL this season, they squeezed that one in late last season in the name of sporting integrity, there is NO RULE to say that you can win your league and stay in the bottom league and play the same teams again, this is something that has just come about. I personally am grateful to just have a team to support but your post makes no sense)

Agree0 Disagree1

Ed I think your wrong because with liquidation there was no way a newco could step right back into the spl, and nieve of you to think that, had it been Kilmarnock or hibs instead of rangers would you have allowed them free passage to the spl. Jj {The Ed039's Note - I am not wrong here, the SPL and SFA had no proper regulations to cover this, and given that it had happened before, I find that most bizarre, they then panicked and made up the rules as they went along? A newco in Airdrie United bought over Clydebanks assets and stepped straight into Division 2 so there has been precedent and if you dont see that then I am afraid you are the one who is very naive)

Agree0 Disagree1

Oh sorry ed I didn't know newco rangers had purchased another club, if that's the case it must have been a div 3 club then. Jj {The Ed039's Note - Read the post, you really are clutching st straws now, it is a newco is it not? You are wasting my time)

Agree0 Disagree1

I saw it in the paper, though im supportive of chuck but what has happened the past 20odd years before all this carryin on? Yes we have been playing celtic, motherwell etc etc in the same league for years, we have a chance to play teams we havent played before and.like at the top.flight before, there is only so.far a team can get promoted, unless fifa or uefa create a league of champions ( where every team who wins their league at the highest division gets promoted to a "super" championship/premiership) so after all, When we win the spl, we will be playing MASSIVE teams........ and celtic

Agree0 Disagree0

Some people are getting it wrong. What Mr Green means is how can you win PROMOTION then end up playing the same teams again the next season. We all know Rangers were playing the same teams over and over when in the spHELL.

BlueStu

Agree0 Disagree0

CG is not interested in anything but Rangers, he is not interested in what is best or fair for Scottish football.

No football association is going to touch rangers with a barge pole

Agree0 Disagree0

BlueStu - winning league DOES NOT gaurentee promotion, as you may not qualify (ground) for next league.

Rangers will be playing other teams, as 4 league changes to 3. No matter how this happens someone will loose out.

Agree0 Disagree0

CG is not interested in anything but Rangers - WRONG!

CG is not interested in anything but money!

he cares little about Rangers, as when at sheffield he carred so much about them, he left them poorer and in dire straights.

Hes burning all bridges to spl, sfa and next sfl (for not getting promotion) and uefa and fifa....

Whyte caused admin

Green will burn rest of history, relations and goodwill which he bought for £1 and will only sell for £ millions.

And gers fans backed him to the hilt.

Agree1 Disagree0

CG is not interested in anything other than selling up at the most profitable time.

When we join the SPL.

Rangers have nowhere else to go.

Who would want us.

Cost v Benefit to other leagues?

Agree1 Disagree0

Im all rangers joining the english league starting at the bottom because the restructering propossles are too confussing to understand

Agree0 Disagree0

Good to see most of the bears on this thread not blaming everyone else for what's going on - makes a pleasant change from the muppets on both sides trying to win brownie points.

Agree1 Disagree0

Oh my god, CG is wanting to pay sexual discrimination law now, as women fom holland and Belgium play in a single league, he's claiming his players in kilts can play in England..... Jog on! {The Ed039's Note - why not?)

Agree0 Disagree0

Im all rangers joining the english league starting at the bottom because the restructering propossles are too confussing to understand
---------------------------------------------

Oh here we go again, when will it get through to some people, Rangers cannot start at the bottom of the English and Welsh league because they are domiciled in Scotland.

Agree1 Disagree1

Gretna played for years in the English system as indeed do Cardiff, Swansea and Wrexham. CG is having a pop at UEFA but if he wins that he still needs to get his application through the English Football League. And then it's with starting at a ridiculously low level in England or somehow buying and taking the place of a league team (Bury was once mentioned as a target).

Agree0 Disagree0

All bluster as usual from Greene!
Wish the blue knights would step in!.
The guys a total embarrassment.

Agree0 Disagree1

Celtic could go to english championshipmleague, where £40 million prize if win into premiership for 2 teams and as celtic are cl level that's good for them

gers would enter at very lowest level and have harder route, imagine away games all over england!

Agree0 Disagree1

Rangers and celtic should stay in scotland or the game is dead here end of

Agree0 Disagree0

Which part of " England does not want nor need " the OF do people not understand, there is no financial advantage to any league to invite the OF.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jan 2013 16:30:37
As Magners now official sponsors of Celtic, hearing Green has negotiated to stay with Tennents (no rise in sponsorship money) going it alone now.

Believable21 Unbelievable52

If that were true don't you think cg would be shouting it from the rooftops? And as for going it alone C&C own both Tennents and Magners.

Agree3 Disagree0

Sponsorship cash was slashed at end of season.Tennents were willing to pay a lot less as exposure in Div 3 would be a lot less(obviously).
Told Green turned Tennents down.Therefore, we don't have a shirt sponsor for next season.I'm sure we'll get one but it'll be worth nothing like the deal we'd get in the top Division.

Agree0 Disagree2

How will it be less exposure?!?!

Our games are shown live on Sky/ESPN and we get 50'000 turning up to every home game, that's more exposure than 11 of the 12 teams in the SPL!

If anything people are watching us more closely now we are in the 3rd division, we should be able to get a deal to match anything in the SPL, i wouldn't have thought it matters what tier your playing in as long as people are watching.

Agree3 Disagree0

Celtics deal is worth triple than the previous bet cg will be kicking him self now

Agree0 Disagree4

11/12 clubs don't have a lucrative (in scottish football terms) sponsorship in place at the moment. Fud

Agree1 Disagree0

Cg saying we will leave scottish football won't help in our persuit of a new deal-uncertainty is bad in the finanacial world

Agree0 Disagree0

With Rangers having TRIPLE the viewing figures of Celtic 190k for first game of season compared to 60k Sponsorship should not be a problem

Agree2 Disagree0

Less exposure ?

Obviously, sky does show div 3 gers games - but all duds, not a stunner in any of them.

50,000 in ibrox, but thats half the audience that would have watched on sky.....

CL matches get worldwide exposure, sky div3 matches up against EPL matches - so no real audience.

And who will pay massive sponsor money to div 3 team, which may leave scottish football next season... ?

Agree0 Disagree2

You honestly believe Rangers have more exposure now they're playing in the 3rd div rather than SPL and European Competition? Man Up.

Agree0 Disagree2

No corporate sponsor is going to offer anything like what they would have if we were in SPL and Europe, its basic commerce for pete's sake. My fear is CG's continual outbursts and this latest one is worst yet will make any sponsorship less attractive than it already is.

Agree2 Disagree1

Less exposure? All Division 3 are duds... there hasn't been a decent SPL game on the box this season.. the biggest draw you would think would be the Edinburgh Derby.. having watched the last one, it was absolute garbage. SPL duds who couldn't pass the ball to a player in the same coloured shirt.. once again MINCE!! With the dreadful viewing figures wouldn't surprise me if the money from Sky/ESPN is reduced again.

Agree2 Disagree0

It doesnt matter how poor the game was the fact you watched it defeats your own argument {The Ed039's Note - I didnt watch it as I have no reason to, but surely if the game was garbage and neutrals were watching, then they would think twice about watching again? I think this is what might worry the broadcasters, especially the hype they put into the game)

Agree1 Disagree1

Im hearing sports direct will have the shirt sponsor for next season and puma will be making the kit as part of the mike ashley deal as puma and sports direct have a deal together

Agree1 Disagree0

Mmm, watched Edinburgh derby and Annan v Rangers, think I know which was more entertaining, from killie fan ! {The Ed039's Note - As a Killie fan you have been spoiled for entertainment over the years. Nobody is saying that game was entertaining, its the viewing figures that matter, and how many are going to tune into Kille vs Hearts as opposed to Rangers v Peterhead, its all down to viewing figures, Rangers will consistantly draw big figures, while others wont, this will effect the contract on offer)

Agree1 Disagree1

Our next three year sponsorship deal should cover us winning promotion through the leagues and the SPL in straight succession, a feat never done before in world football. I'm sure potential sponsors would love their logo associated with that achievement, pics will be seen worldwide.

Agree2 Disagree0

Rangers are a toxic brand. I think they will struggle to find a sponsor. The association with the old club and its unpaid debts will make it difficult to find anyone willing to endorse them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Wrongly convicted?? What are you on? Rangers are only one of the biggest stories in world football when you speak to the fans. Green is damaging the reputation of the club in my opinion. he's turning it in to a vendetta and people are starting to compare him to Mad Vlad at Hearts. The club needs to keep its head down and go about its business with dignity. The rules and sentence won't change so don't keep bleating on about it. Rise above it.

Agree1 Disagree0

Lol - why would a big paying sponsor want any association with rangers winning div3 versus diddy teams, div2 versus diddy teams and div1 versus diddy teams.

So big audiences today, but that's cos rangers nearly died last year, three years of 3-0 every week, will pail and loose any interest... no one want to want 3-0 whitewashes and 1 man-sent off each game ???

Paying viewers is the key, not half price tickets, or internet freebie watchers...

look at the adverts around ibrox, not one big large brand for internation coverage, glasgow hotels and the like.. laughable.

its peanuts sponsorship at present.

Ashley may get shirt for nothing as part of his investment already, so he gets even more value for no money to team.

Agree0 Disagree0

But the sentence has now changed for all the turkeys who voted for Christmas, three years to get back to the SPL instead of the four Rangers are going to take. The corruption is plain to see. Your right it is a vendetta!
Rangers were ultimately punished beyond the rules of the game for being taken down by a shark who asset stripped the club and who's motives are yet unknown.
Even lord Nimmo stated that the SPL had no right to vote Rangers out but that is fight for another day, just bide your time Bears we will take the whole stinking corrupt league down.

Agree0 Disagree1

AHEM biggest story in world football ?? i think not, maybe here in Scotland but i doubt anywhere/anyone else are interested, in fact most of the planet have never heard of The Rangers. {The Ed039's Note - you any idea how daft you sound, it's been well publicised the widespread coverage rangers have been receiving)

Agree0 Disagree0

Triple the viewing figures . right. i read for every rfc game the average is 129000 and cfc is 229000?

Agree0 Disagree1

Triple the figures of Celtic? Some people do speak a lot of charles green" on this site".
C'mon, get real, your brand is becoming more toxic by the day. Even if you go to the bottom of the English leagues, Celtic would be leagues ahead of you in a couple of years.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent