06 Aug 2018 21:38:17
We need mould and lafferty as both can change a game if they get service, we don't need more defenders I am perplexed at this as we have Wallace and John that can both play there and Wallace could play at CH if needed. 2 million better spent on moult and lafferty.

1.) 07 Aug 2018
06 Aug 2018 23:22:20
tommirangers I completely agree with you. I said weeks ago that Lafferty and Moult would be a NO BRAINER. Get rid of Windass, and sign both of them. You then have two proven goalscorers in the SPL, and together they would not break the bank. We would also have the added bonus of more competition up front. win win.

2.) 07 Aug 2018
06 Aug 2018 23:39:43
Just because we have wallace and john doesn't mean we are covered at left back, see where I'm going👍.

3.) 07 Aug 2018
06 Aug 2018 23:42:01
Tommirangers I think the lad has been brought in knowing if he continues to play the way he did against us he's a money machine! Also John is away to Swansea and no doubt Wallace will never play for us again!

4.) 07 Aug 2018
07 Aug 2018 00:02:29
Lafferty will score goals in this team for sure. Don't think I'd have moult though and i can't see Wallace ever breaking back into the team now he looked well off the pace even when he was playing he's finished.

5.) 07 Aug 2018
07 Aug 2018 00:53:51
I would take this Croatian boy over Wallace and John any day of the week. Wallace is already a poor defender so putting him in the middle would be suicidal.

I must say I'm glad you don't do the transfer deals for the club, £2 million for Lafferty (30 year old, last year of contract) and Moult (A bang average striker who has struggled in the championship) . I'll stick to Gerrard and Mark Allen's choices in that area 👍.