14 Apr 2020 15:12:15
Apparently Patrick have had legal advice and they think Dundee's original no vote should count.


1.) 14 Apr 2020
14 Apr 2020 15:55:22
its in the rules any club can change from a no vote to a yes vote but not a yes to a no vote they have 28days to do so.


2.) 14 Apr 2020
14 Apr 2020 16:23:07
All clubs Knew of the procedure of being allowed a no vote to a yes but not allowed a yes vote to a no so I’d doubt that lawyers credentials?


3.) 14 Apr 2020
14 Apr 2020 17:21:18
It seems dundee have released a statement saying they have now been involved in negotiations about possible league reconstruction? Now if that is the case then the whole vote needs scrapped as Dundee’s vote is now being influenced by additional in formation and options? Options that all the other clubs didn’t have? So it needs to be a remote based on all upto date proposals and procedures? Only correct way to do it?


4.) 15 Apr 2020
14 Apr 2020 23:36:09
Big blue bear, can change for one and not the other, what a load of jiz, who made up these rules, this is sounder more like dictatorship every time i hear another rule that goes for some, but not for others, phew.


5.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 00:26:18
Like other posters have said. Dundee, clearly voted no, then have been bullied or bribed, or both, To change they're vote, absolute farce only the sfa would allow. Woulfnt happen under any other orgsnisation.


6.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 11:41:32
Paul seemingly this is company law regarding voting procedures. The main thing fir me now is the spfl late not governed by company law as they are an independent body . Also I don’t know but I doubt if all teams were notified about the no vote being allowed to change . As far as I know it was a 5 pm deadline end of
But hey who knows, it was a doc with multiple pages ( I heard 120 pages then I heard 50 ) that was to be deciphered in less than 48 hours .
Hopefully Mr Park is just waiting on a few pieces of evidence then we will react.


7.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 12:19:32
Paul and molsgoals spfl is not a company.


8.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 12:21:29
big blue you are correct but you forget it was submitted to a deadline not a 28 day process. the deadline for that motion was in place and votes would only be changed if the motion was readdressed. in other words still on the table. it is now because of this vote.


9.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 13:03:12
Exactly John that was my point . so they cannot be governed by company law
We would need to check their rules on voting right enough or even the proposal they sent to member clubs . it might be in there . am sure Rangers are on it . the Patrick QC
Seems to think they are wrong.


10.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 14:02:09
Good if we let thistle take the lead. U see iom still saying we have not raised 10 million since October.
I really can’t understand him.


11.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 17:01:23
I’m just wondering how you can say the spfl is not a company? They employ staff they pay wages the hold a bank account they negotiate contracts so I would maybe call that a company? So if so they need to comply with basic company law? And Dundee have just released a statement stating they have not been offered enticements and both Celtic and Rangers have both acted in a professional manner.


12.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 17:31:28
Big p they r a board not a company as defined by Companies act.


13.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 18:23:31
John25, As far as aware The Rules and Regulations of the SPFL state that the Scottish Professional Football League Limited is a Company and refer to the Chief Executive of the Company, Also state any reference to the Act as being a reference to the 2006 Companies Act.


14.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 19:50:53
Cool Bankie. I’ve not looked at it. Too many dying to worry too much about a game.


15.) 15 Apr 2020
15 Apr 2020 20:58:29
Agree John25, stay safe.


16.) 17 Apr 2020
17 Apr 2020 08:31:36
Bankie, cheers for that confirmation mate, i thought they were a company also. not that i know much about companies, but was sure they came under company, as i'd read it, somewhere.