02 Apr 2015 20:12:03
RMGers, a few days ago you raged on here the following guff:

"The NOMAD was always going to be appointed because they hope to raise between £10m and £14 million in a share issue, did all you conspiracy theorist mutters actually think they would delist and miss that funding opportunity? Or were you all clutching at straws?"

That post can still be read below, dated 28 March.

Please can you come on here and show your red face, I'm sure all the mutters will be dying to see what straws you clutch at to avoid having to apologise and admit you got it wrong. This is what happens when you hero worship at the feet of a proven liar, you end up with his sh#t all over your face.


1.) 02 Apr 2015
02 Apr 2015 21:27:10
delisting is not the end of the world they can still attract investment by selling shares it will possibly be cheaper to be delisted anway


2.) 02 Apr 2015
02 Apr 2015 22:23:36
The initial money of investment will come from fans who buy season tickets. Heard the usual plumbers, joiners , glaziers give there expert opinion on AIM listing. I have adegree in Engineering and am paid well to understand complex equations , I will refrain from making any comments about AIM as I have never been and never will be interested in it other than I giving money to RF who I trust will aid and assist RFC .


3.) 03 Apr 2015
02 Apr 2015 22:32:07
What as king lied about with this nomad? He said he had one lined up and he did. It just never worked out. It wasn't down to his failings, it was down to the previous board


4.) 03 Apr 2015
03 Apr 2015 01:11:37
You'll have to explain that one to me James. How was it the fault of the previous board? Didn't the previous board have a NOMAD? Dave King clearly stated that he had a NOMAD lined up. That was a lie.

Paul Murray stated that we are lining up to list on the ISDX however, in order to be eligible we need at least 12 months' capital, we are living on emergency loans and therefore not eligible. Surely PM knows this. If not I am worried about his suitability.

We need to wake up, we are in the position we are now because of the current board. They were the ones who championed a boycott, they are the ones trying to appoint a convicted criminal to the chairmanship (against AIM rules).

We are walking back into oblivion. Wake up.


5.) 03 Apr 2015
03 Apr 2015 01:40:21
How do you know he had one lined up? Remember allegiances with the Dallas Cowboys that a former messiah said? I agree with Pauline, blindly following anyone who makes the right noises to fool the masses!
He may have had one lined up, why did this not happen? Where is the transperancy that has been promised that your long suffering loyal, (let face it, there are none more loyal that the Rangers support!) fans have been longing for?
I am hoping that there is a long term plan here and that you all haven't been fleeced again!


6.) 03 Apr 2015
02 Apr 2015 23:22:45
Pauline its a forum if you can see my red face you are even more brilliant than you think you are. We will be listed on another platform and there will be a share issue to raise between £10 and £15 million so embarrassed I am not but thanks for thinking of me, is this one of those love hate things developing? Do you fancy a drink?


7.) 03 Apr 2015
02 Apr 2015 23:27:30
Oh and there doesn't seem to be excrement on my face either. As I explained we will be listed because a large percentage of our shares are owned by institutions who require it. The same institutions who like me voted for change and the new Board, did you vote against it Pauline my dear? Do you own any of our shares?


8.) 03 Apr 2015
03 Apr 2015 08:55:51
Well here we go again. groundhog day anyone?
First there is a Nomad then there isn't, this transparency thing is so nice.(not) We the fans are away to do out usual and Follow follow blindly. do we ever learn? apparently not . I have no gripe with King and co have not been anti them at any point, but this is taking the proverbial. beep beep. I'm away to do an "Ally" and ask. "name the Nomad" who said it was down to the mismanagement of the old board. so we can all see the reasons in black and white and then move on. simples
How in the name of Rangers do the people we put in power think its best to give us information that they and only they feel is to be feed to us? if this is to continue then they are no better than the previous rogues. God even that Prior is saying they are at it. confused anyone??


9.) 03 Apr 2015
03 Apr 2015 16:39:19
Give them a chance Ally, Rome wasn't built in a day and all that jazz. Let's see what transpires with King, remember on day of EGM, he stated his preference, he got it.


10.) 03 Apr 2015
03 Apr 2015 21:14:15
Ok, don't give them a chance then.


11.) 04 Apr 2015
04 Apr 2015 15:06:42
My understanding was that the NOMAD lined up could not look at any of the business setup until after DK & ttb won the EGM.
At that point the NOMAD HAD to look at 2 things before he would agree to carry on. 1 were the current board & likely board members (king)!clear of any issue which might cause problems with AIM = answer No problem everything fine.
2 look at the business and outstanding financial situation with current contracts and see if these can be supported = answer NO THEY WERE NOT & therefore the NOMAD refused to take up the role.
This was not the current boards doing, the only contract (if there is one?) was to get McCall & black in.

There is a sh!tstorm coming and these guys are the only ones I see stepping up to try and fix it. Give them until at least the end of the season to see what comes out.

One thing I do agree with though is, the production of title deeds for Ibrox would stop some of the flak.

Pauline - just once try and say something positive!!


12.) 06 Apr 2015
05 Apr 2015 23:38:05
Bil72 bang on mate bang on.thats the way I and most supporters see it mate.